Nested family of sets with given Hausdorff dimensionExistence of a set with given Hausdorff...
Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?
How to simplify this time periods definition interface?
The difference between「N分で」and「後N分で」
Are there verbs that are neither telic, or atelic?
What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?
How to deal with taxi scam when on vacation?
Can a druid choose the size of its wild shape beast?
Existence of subset with given Hausdorff dimension
Is it true that good novels will automatically sell themselves on Amazon (and so on) and there is no need for one to waste time promoting?
What approach do we need to follow for projects without a test environment?
Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work
Professor being mistaken for a grad student
Do the common programs (for example: "ls", "cat") in Linux and BSD come from the same source code?
Look at your watch and tell me what time is it. vs Look at your watch and tell me what time it is
Does Mathematica reuse previous computations?
Have researchers managed to "reverse time"? If so, what does that mean for physics?
How to change two letters closest to a string and one letter immediately after a string using notepad++
What's the meaning of “spike” in the context of “adrenaline spike”?
How to explain that I do not want to visit a country due to personal safety concern?
Who is flying the vertibirds?
Why Choose Less Effective Armour Types?
Happy pi day, everyone!
How to read the value of this capacitor?
Gravity magic - How does it work?
Nested family of sets with given Hausdorff dimension
Existence of a set with given Hausdorff dimensionHausdorff measure with non-power test functionHausdorff Dimension of Arbitrary Julia SetHausdorff dimension mathces Box-counting dimensionMinkowski dimension behaviour of sets with positive finite Hausdorff measure.Lower Bound of Hausdorff Dimension of Cantor SetIs there a “measure” $mu$ on $mathbb{R}$ which encodes Hausdorff measure of every dimension?A closed subset of $[0,1]$ with no interiors and has measure exactly $1$Lusin theorem and Fat Cantor setAre there simple criteria for determining if there is a finite, non-zero Hausdorff measure of a set?Existence of a set with given Hausdorff dimension
$begingroup$
Just before (namely here Existence of a set with given Hausdorff dimension) I asked whether one can find for any real number $alpha>0$ a set $A_alpha$ such that $A_alpha$ has Hausdorff dimension $alpha$. The answer was constructive and used fat Cantor sets and taking the cartesian product with some unit intervall. This made me wonder whether one could push this a bit further, namely
Can we find a family of sets $(A_alpha)_{alpha>0}$ such that $A_alpha$ has Hausdorff dimension $alpha$, $A_n $ is homotopic to $[0,1]^n$ for $nin mathbb{N}$ and $A_alphasubset A_beta$ for $alpha < beta$?
measure-theory geometric-measure-theory
$endgroup$
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Just before (namely here Existence of a set with given Hausdorff dimension) I asked whether one can find for any real number $alpha>0$ a set $A_alpha$ such that $A_alpha$ has Hausdorff dimension $alpha$. The answer was constructive and used fat Cantor sets and taking the cartesian product with some unit intervall. This made me wonder whether one could push this a bit further, namely
Can we find a family of sets $(A_alpha)_{alpha>0}$ such that $A_alpha$ has Hausdorff dimension $alpha$, $A_n $ is homotopic to $[0,1]^n$ for $nin mathbb{N}$ and $A_alphasubset A_beta$ for $alpha < beta$?
measure-theory geometric-measure-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Interesting question ! Unlike in the link you mentioned, we cannot really consider the case $0<alpha<1$ and then generalize with induction, because we would not be sure that $A_{alpha} subset A_{beta}$ when $alpha to n^-$ and $beta to n^+$. Thinking about it
$endgroup$
– Charles Madeline
Mar 10 at 22:23
$begingroup$
@CharlesMadeline I think the inclusion you describe are not problematic, as we can modify our family such that $A_{gamma+1}:= A_gamma times [0;1] cup [0;1]^{lfloor gamma rfloor}times {0}$. The thing I do not see is how we get inclusions for $0<gamma<1$.
$endgroup$
– Severin Schraven
2 days ago
$begingroup$
ah yes, that is right indeed. The Cantor sets are a priori not really nested ; what would suffice is a lemma like: if $A subset B$ and $mbox{dim}_H(A) < mbox{dim}_H(B)$, then there exists $C$ with $A subset C subset B$ and $mbox{dim}_H(A)<mbox{dim}_H(C) < mbox{dim}_H(C)$
$endgroup$
– Charles Madeline
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@CharlesMadeline I am not quite sure whether that would suffice (as we are dealing with an uncountable family).
$endgroup$
– Severin Schraven
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I think that would do. There is a classic exercise that says: if $f$ is a continuous function on $[0,1]$ such that for all $x<y$, there is $lambda in ]0,1[$ s.t. $f(lambda x +(1-lambda)y)le $lambda f(x)+(1-lambda)f(y)$. Then $f$ is convex. In our case, you have a dense set of correct values $alpha$. Take unions and conclude
$endgroup$
– Charles Madeline
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Just before (namely here Existence of a set with given Hausdorff dimension) I asked whether one can find for any real number $alpha>0$ a set $A_alpha$ such that $A_alpha$ has Hausdorff dimension $alpha$. The answer was constructive and used fat Cantor sets and taking the cartesian product with some unit intervall. This made me wonder whether one could push this a bit further, namely
Can we find a family of sets $(A_alpha)_{alpha>0}$ such that $A_alpha$ has Hausdorff dimension $alpha$, $A_n $ is homotopic to $[0,1]^n$ for $nin mathbb{N}$ and $A_alphasubset A_beta$ for $alpha < beta$?
measure-theory geometric-measure-theory
$endgroup$
Just before (namely here Existence of a set with given Hausdorff dimension) I asked whether one can find for any real number $alpha>0$ a set $A_alpha$ such that $A_alpha$ has Hausdorff dimension $alpha$. The answer was constructive and used fat Cantor sets and taking the cartesian product with some unit intervall. This made me wonder whether one could push this a bit further, namely
Can we find a family of sets $(A_alpha)_{alpha>0}$ such that $A_alpha$ has Hausdorff dimension $alpha$, $A_n $ is homotopic to $[0,1]^n$ for $nin mathbb{N}$ and $A_alphasubset A_beta$ for $alpha < beta$?
measure-theory geometric-measure-theory
measure-theory geometric-measure-theory
edited 2 hours ago
Severin Schraven
asked Mar 10 at 21:36
Severin SchravenSeverin Schraven
6,4401935
6,4401935
$begingroup$
Interesting question ! Unlike in the link you mentioned, we cannot really consider the case $0<alpha<1$ and then generalize with induction, because we would not be sure that $A_{alpha} subset A_{beta}$ when $alpha to n^-$ and $beta to n^+$. Thinking about it
$endgroup$
– Charles Madeline
Mar 10 at 22:23
$begingroup$
@CharlesMadeline I think the inclusion you describe are not problematic, as we can modify our family such that $A_{gamma+1}:= A_gamma times [0;1] cup [0;1]^{lfloor gamma rfloor}times {0}$. The thing I do not see is how we get inclusions for $0<gamma<1$.
$endgroup$
– Severin Schraven
2 days ago
$begingroup$
ah yes, that is right indeed. The Cantor sets are a priori not really nested ; what would suffice is a lemma like: if $A subset B$ and $mbox{dim}_H(A) < mbox{dim}_H(B)$, then there exists $C$ with $A subset C subset B$ and $mbox{dim}_H(A)<mbox{dim}_H(C) < mbox{dim}_H(C)$
$endgroup$
– Charles Madeline
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@CharlesMadeline I am not quite sure whether that would suffice (as we are dealing with an uncountable family).
$endgroup$
– Severin Schraven
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I think that would do. There is a classic exercise that says: if $f$ is a continuous function on $[0,1]$ such that for all $x<y$, there is $lambda in ]0,1[$ s.t. $f(lambda x +(1-lambda)y)le $lambda f(x)+(1-lambda)f(y)$. Then $f$ is convex. In our case, you have a dense set of correct values $alpha$. Take unions and conclude
$endgroup$
– Charles Madeline
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Interesting question ! Unlike in the link you mentioned, we cannot really consider the case $0<alpha<1$ and then generalize with induction, because we would not be sure that $A_{alpha} subset A_{beta}$ when $alpha to n^-$ and $beta to n^+$. Thinking about it
$endgroup$
– Charles Madeline
Mar 10 at 22:23
$begingroup$
@CharlesMadeline I think the inclusion you describe are not problematic, as we can modify our family such that $A_{gamma+1}:= A_gamma times [0;1] cup [0;1]^{lfloor gamma rfloor}times {0}$. The thing I do not see is how we get inclusions for $0<gamma<1$.
$endgroup$
– Severin Schraven
2 days ago
$begingroup$
ah yes, that is right indeed. The Cantor sets are a priori not really nested ; what would suffice is a lemma like: if $A subset B$ and $mbox{dim}_H(A) < mbox{dim}_H(B)$, then there exists $C$ with $A subset C subset B$ and $mbox{dim}_H(A)<mbox{dim}_H(C) < mbox{dim}_H(C)$
$endgroup$
– Charles Madeline
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@CharlesMadeline I am not quite sure whether that would suffice (as we are dealing with an uncountable family).
$endgroup$
– Severin Schraven
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I think that would do. There is a classic exercise that says: if $f$ is a continuous function on $[0,1]$ such that for all $x<y$, there is $lambda in ]0,1[$ s.t. $f(lambda x +(1-lambda)y)le $lambda f(x)+(1-lambda)f(y)$. Then $f$ is convex. In our case, you have a dense set of correct values $alpha$. Take unions and conclude
$endgroup$
– Charles Madeline
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Interesting question ! Unlike in the link you mentioned, we cannot really consider the case $0<alpha<1$ and then generalize with induction, because we would not be sure that $A_{alpha} subset A_{beta}$ when $alpha to n^-$ and $beta to n^+$. Thinking about it
$endgroup$
– Charles Madeline
Mar 10 at 22:23
$begingroup$
Interesting question ! Unlike in the link you mentioned, we cannot really consider the case $0<alpha<1$ and then generalize with induction, because we would not be sure that $A_{alpha} subset A_{beta}$ when $alpha to n^-$ and $beta to n^+$. Thinking about it
$endgroup$
– Charles Madeline
Mar 10 at 22:23
$begingroup$
@CharlesMadeline I think the inclusion you describe are not problematic, as we can modify our family such that $A_{gamma+1}:= A_gamma times [0;1] cup [0;1]^{lfloor gamma rfloor}times {0}$. The thing I do not see is how we get inclusions for $0<gamma<1$.
$endgroup$
– Severin Schraven
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@CharlesMadeline I think the inclusion you describe are not problematic, as we can modify our family such that $A_{gamma+1}:= A_gamma times [0;1] cup [0;1]^{lfloor gamma rfloor}times {0}$. The thing I do not see is how we get inclusions for $0<gamma<1$.
$endgroup$
– Severin Schraven
2 days ago
$begingroup$
ah yes, that is right indeed. The Cantor sets are a priori not really nested ; what would suffice is a lemma like: if $A subset B$ and $mbox{dim}_H(A) < mbox{dim}_H(B)$, then there exists $C$ with $A subset C subset B$ and $mbox{dim}_H(A)<mbox{dim}_H(C) < mbox{dim}_H(C)$
$endgroup$
– Charles Madeline
2 days ago
$begingroup$
ah yes, that is right indeed. The Cantor sets are a priori not really nested ; what would suffice is a lemma like: if $A subset B$ and $mbox{dim}_H(A) < mbox{dim}_H(B)$, then there exists $C$ with $A subset C subset B$ and $mbox{dim}_H(A)<mbox{dim}_H(C) < mbox{dim}_H(C)$
$endgroup$
– Charles Madeline
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@CharlesMadeline I am not quite sure whether that would suffice (as we are dealing with an uncountable family).
$endgroup$
– Severin Schraven
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@CharlesMadeline I am not quite sure whether that would suffice (as we are dealing with an uncountable family).
$endgroup$
– Severin Schraven
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I think that would do. There is a classic exercise that says: if $f$ is a continuous function on $[0,1]$ such that for all $x<y$, there is $lambda in ]0,1[$ s.t. $f(lambda x +(1-lambda)y)le $lambda f(x)+(1-lambda)f(y)$. Then $f$ is convex. In our case, you have a dense set of correct values $alpha$. Take unions and conclude
$endgroup$
– Charles Madeline
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I think that would do. There is a classic exercise that says: if $f$ is a continuous function on $[0,1]$ such that for all $x<y$, there is $lambda in ]0,1[$ s.t. $f(lambda x +(1-lambda)y)le $lambda f(x)+(1-lambda)f(y)$. Then $f$ is convex. In our case, you have a dense set of correct values $alpha$. Take unions and conclude
$endgroup$
– Charles Madeline
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Is a wrap up of the comments by Charles Madeline and the reference given by Skeeve in this mathoverflow question https://mathoverflow.net/questions/325532/existence-of-subset-with-given-hausdorff-dimension.
In Theorem 5.6 from The Geometry of Fractal Sets by Falconer stating that for any Souslin space $Asubseteq mathbb{R}^n$ and any $0<alpha < text{dim}_H(A)$ there exists a compact set $Ksubset A$ such that $alpha= text{dim}_H(K)$.
From this we get that for all Souslin spaces $Asubset B subseteq [0;1]$ and any $gamma in (text{dim}_H(A); text{dim}_H(B)) $ there exists $Asubseteq C subseteq B$ such that $text{dim}_H(C)= gamma$.
Indeed, this follows from the fact that $Bsetminus A$ is a Souslin space again and that $dim_H(Bsetminus A)= dim_H(B)$ as $dim_H(B) = dim_H(Bsetminus A cup A)= max{ dim_H(Bsetminus A), dim_H(A) }$. This allows us to construct (by induction) a family $(A_alpha)_{alphain [0;1]cap mathbb{Q}}$ sucht that $A_alpha subset A_beta$ for $alpha<beta$ and $dim_H(A_alpha)= alpha$. Furthermore, we may choose $A_1 = [0;1]$.
Finally we define for $gamma in [0;1]$
$$ A_gamma = bigcup_{alpha in [0;gamma]cap mathbb{Q}} A_alpha $$
then we get
$$ dim_H(A_gamma) = dim_Hleft( bigcup_{alpha in [0;gamma]cap mathbb{Q}} A_alpha right) = sup_{alpha in [0;gamma]cap mathbb{Q}} dim_H(A_alpha) = gamma. $$
This family satisfies all the conditions we want. Identifying $[0;1]$ with $[0;1]times {0 }$ we play the same game for $gamma in [1;2]$, respectively with similar identification for all $gamma in [0,infty)$ (we could also use the construction suggested by Charles Madeline in the comments taking the cartesian product with the unit interval to pass from $[n; n+1]$ to $[n+1;n+2]$).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3142948%2fnested-family-of-sets-with-given-hausdorff-dimension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Is a wrap up of the comments by Charles Madeline and the reference given by Skeeve in this mathoverflow question https://mathoverflow.net/questions/325532/existence-of-subset-with-given-hausdorff-dimension.
In Theorem 5.6 from The Geometry of Fractal Sets by Falconer stating that for any Souslin space $Asubseteq mathbb{R}^n$ and any $0<alpha < text{dim}_H(A)$ there exists a compact set $Ksubset A$ such that $alpha= text{dim}_H(K)$.
From this we get that for all Souslin spaces $Asubset B subseteq [0;1]$ and any $gamma in (text{dim}_H(A); text{dim}_H(B)) $ there exists $Asubseteq C subseteq B$ such that $text{dim}_H(C)= gamma$.
Indeed, this follows from the fact that $Bsetminus A$ is a Souslin space again and that $dim_H(Bsetminus A)= dim_H(B)$ as $dim_H(B) = dim_H(Bsetminus A cup A)= max{ dim_H(Bsetminus A), dim_H(A) }$. This allows us to construct (by induction) a family $(A_alpha)_{alphain [0;1]cap mathbb{Q}}$ sucht that $A_alpha subset A_beta$ for $alpha<beta$ and $dim_H(A_alpha)= alpha$. Furthermore, we may choose $A_1 = [0;1]$.
Finally we define for $gamma in [0;1]$
$$ A_gamma = bigcup_{alpha in [0;gamma]cap mathbb{Q}} A_alpha $$
then we get
$$ dim_H(A_gamma) = dim_Hleft( bigcup_{alpha in [0;gamma]cap mathbb{Q}} A_alpha right) = sup_{alpha in [0;gamma]cap mathbb{Q}} dim_H(A_alpha) = gamma. $$
This family satisfies all the conditions we want. Identifying $[0;1]$ with $[0;1]times {0 }$ we play the same game for $gamma in [1;2]$, respectively with similar identification for all $gamma in [0,infty)$ (we could also use the construction suggested by Charles Madeline in the comments taking the cartesian product with the unit interval to pass from $[n; n+1]$ to $[n+1;n+2]$).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is a wrap up of the comments by Charles Madeline and the reference given by Skeeve in this mathoverflow question https://mathoverflow.net/questions/325532/existence-of-subset-with-given-hausdorff-dimension.
In Theorem 5.6 from The Geometry of Fractal Sets by Falconer stating that for any Souslin space $Asubseteq mathbb{R}^n$ and any $0<alpha < text{dim}_H(A)$ there exists a compact set $Ksubset A$ such that $alpha= text{dim}_H(K)$.
From this we get that for all Souslin spaces $Asubset B subseteq [0;1]$ and any $gamma in (text{dim}_H(A); text{dim}_H(B)) $ there exists $Asubseteq C subseteq B$ such that $text{dim}_H(C)= gamma$.
Indeed, this follows from the fact that $Bsetminus A$ is a Souslin space again and that $dim_H(Bsetminus A)= dim_H(B)$ as $dim_H(B) = dim_H(Bsetminus A cup A)= max{ dim_H(Bsetminus A), dim_H(A) }$. This allows us to construct (by induction) a family $(A_alpha)_{alphain [0;1]cap mathbb{Q}}$ sucht that $A_alpha subset A_beta$ for $alpha<beta$ and $dim_H(A_alpha)= alpha$. Furthermore, we may choose $A_1 = [0;1]$.
Finally we define for $gamma in [0;1]$
$$ A_gamma = bigcup_{alpha in [0;gamma]cap mathbb{Q}} A_alpha $$
then we get
$$ dim_H(A_gamma) = dim_Hleft( bigcup_{alpha in [0;gamma]cap mathbb{Q}} A_alpha right) = sup_{alpha in [0;gamma]cap mathbb{Q}} dim_H(A_alpha) = gamma. $$
This family satisfies all the conditions we want. Identifying $[0;1]$ with $[0;1]times {0 }$ we play the same game for $gamma in [1;2]$, respectively with similar identification for all $gamma in [0,infty)$ (we could also use the construction suggested by Charles Madeline in the comments taking the cartesian product with the unit interval to pass from $[n; n+1]$ to $[n+1;n+2]$).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is a wrap up of the comments by Charles Madeline and the reference given by Skeeve in this mathoverflow question https://mathoverflow.net/questions/325532/existence-of-subset-with-given-hausdorff-dimension.
In Theorem 5.6 from The Geometry of Fractal Sets by Falconer stating that for any Souslin space $Asubseteq mathbb{R}^n$ and any $0<alpha < text{dim}_H(A)$ there exists a compact set $Ksubset A$ such that $alpha= text{dim}_H(K)$.
From this we get that for all Souslin spaces $Asubset B subseteq [0;1]$ and any $gamma in (text{dim}_H(A); text{dim}_H(B)) $ there exists $Asubseteq C subseteq B$ such that $text{dim}_H(C)= gamma$.
Indeed, this follows from the fact that $Bsetminus A$ is a Souslin space again and that $dim_H(Bsetminus A)= dim_H(B)$ as $dim_H(B) = dim_H(Bsetminus A cup A)= max{ dim_H(Bsetminus A), dim_H(A) }$. This allows us to construct (by induction) a family $(A_alpha)_{alphain [0;1]cap mathbb{Q}}$ sucht that $A_alpha subset A_beta$ for $alpha<beta$ and $dim_H(A_alpha)= alpha$. Furthermore, we may choose $A_1 = [0;1]$.
Finally we define for $gamma in [0;1]$
$$ A_gamma = bigcup_{alpha in [0;gamma]cap mathbb{Q}} A_alpha $$
then we get
$$ dim_H(A_gamma) = dim_Hleft( bigcup_{alpha in [0;gamma]cap mathbb{Q}} A_alpha right) = sup_{alpha in [0;gamma]cap mathbb{Q}} dim_H(A_alpha) = gamma. $$
This family satisfies all the conditions we want. Identifying $[0;1]$ with $[0;1]times {0 }$ we play the same game for $gamma in [1;2]$, respectively with similar identification for all $gamma in [0,infty)$ (we could also use the construction suggested by Charles Madeline in the comments taking the cartesian product with the unit interval to pass from $[n; n+1]$ to $[n+1;n+2]$).
$endgroup$
Is a wrap up of the comments by Charles Madeline and the reference given by Skeeve in this mathoverflow question https://mathoverflow.net/questions/325532/existence-of-subset-with-given-hausdorff-dimension.
In Theorem 5.6 from The Geometry of Fractal Sets by Falconer stating that for any Souslin space $Asubseteq mathbb{R}^n$ and any $0<alpha < text{dim}_H(A)$ there exists a compact set $Ksubset A$ such that $alpha= text{dim}_H(K)$.
From this we get that for all Souslin spaces $Asubset B subseteq [0;1]$ and any $gamma in (text{dim}_H(A); text{dim}_H(B)) $ there exists $Asubseteq C subseteq B$ such that $text{dim}_H(C)= gamma$.
Indeed, this follows from the fact that $Bsetminus A$ is a Souslin space again and that $dim_H(Bsetminus A)= dim_H(B)$ as $dim_H(B) = dim_H(Bsetminus A cup A)= max{ dim_H(Bsetminus A), dim_H(A) }$. This allows us to construct (by induction) a family $(A_alpha)_{alphain [0;1]cap mathbb{Q}}$ sucht that $A_alpha subset A_beta$ for $alpha<beta$ and $dim_H(A_alpha)= alpha$. Furthermore, we may choose $A_1 = [0;1]$.
Finally we define for $gamma in [0;1]$
$$ A_gamma = bigcup_{alpha in [0;gamma]cap mathbb{Q}} A_alpha $$
then we get
$$ dim_H(A_gamma) = dim_Hleft( bigcup_{alpha in [0;gamma]cap mathbb{Q}} A_alpha right) = sup_{alpha in [0;gamma]cap mathbb{Q}} dim_H(A_alpha) = gamma. $$
This family satisfies all the conditions we want. Identifying $[0;1]$ with $[0;1]times {0 }$ we play the same game for $gamma in [1;2]$, respectively with similar identification for all $gamma in [0,infty)$ (we could also use the construction suggested by Charles Madeline in the comments taking the cartesian product with the unit interval to pass from $[n; n+1]$ to $[n+1;n+2]$).
answered 2 hours ago
Severin SchravenSeverin Schraven
6,4401935
6,4401935
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3142948%2fnested-family-of-sets-with-given-hausdorff-dimension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Interesting question ! Unlike in the link you mentioned, we cannot really consider the case $0<alpha<1$ and then generalize with induction, because we would not be sure that $A_{alpha} subset A_{beta}$ when $alpha to n^-$ and $beta to n^+$. Thinking about it
$endgroup$
– Charles Madeline
Mar 10 at 22:23
$begingroup$
@CharlesMadeline I think the inclusion you describe are not problematic, as we can modify our family such that $A_{gamma+1}:= A_gamma times [0;1] cup [0;1]^{lfloor gamma rfloor}times {0}$. The thing I do not see is how we get inclusions for $0<gamma<1$.
$endgroup$
– Severin Schraven
2 days ago
$begingroup$
ah yes, that is right indeed. The Cantor sets are a priori not really nested ; what would suffice is a lemma like: if $A subset B$ and $mbox{dim}_H(A) < mbox{dim}_H(B)$, then there exists $C$ with $A subset C subset B$ and $mbox{dim}_H(A)<mbox{dim}_H(C) < mbox{dim}_H(C)$
$endgroup$
– Charles Madeline
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@CharlesMadeline I am not quite sure whether that would suffice (as we are dealing with an uncountable family).
$endgroup$
– Severin Schraven
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I think that would do. There is a classic exercise that says: if $f$ is a continuous function on $[0,1]$ such that for all $x<y$, there is $lambda in ]0,1[$ s.t. $f(lambda x +(1-lambda)y)le $lambda f(x)+(1-lambda)f(y)$. Then $f$ is convex. In our case, you have a dense set of correct values $alpha$. Take unions and conclude
$endgroup$
– Charles Madeline
2 days ago