Is the statement $(∀x ∈ Q)(∃y ∈ Bbb Q)(x cdot y ∈ Bbb Z)$ true?Predicate and Statementwhat is the...
Should I apply for my boss's promotion?
How can I portion out frozen cookie dough?
Cross out words with overlapping to nearby words
An Undercover Army
Having the player face themselves after the mid-game
Generating a list with duplicate entries
Vector-transposing function
Professor forcing me to attend a conference, I can't afford even with 50% funding
Can a space-faring robot still function over a billion years?
Computation logic of Partway in TikZ
Use Mercury as quenching liquid for swords?
Why aren't there more Gauls like Obelix?
Cycles on the torus
Help! My Character is too much for her story!
Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?
Is it a Cyclops number? "Nobody" knows!
What do you call someone who likes to pick fights?
Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?
Is there a math expression equivalent to the conditional ternary operator?
What is Tony Stark injecting into himself in Iron Man 3?
The (Easy) Road to Code
Observable universe radius for distant observers
Short story about an infectious indestructible metal bar?
Boss Telling direct supervisor I snitched
Is the statement $(∀x ∈ Q)(∃y ∈ Bbb Q)(x cdot y ∈ Bbb Z)$ true?
Predicate and Statementwhat is the meaning of this predicate statementWhat is a predicate exactly in predicate logic?Finding an interpretation that makes a formula truePredicate and quantifiers_discreteDiscrete Mathematics, Predicates and Negationpredicate logic - function mapping outside of domainabout counter-example for Quantifier based statement (logic)Does ∧ still mean intersection when using predicate logic?Is 2 <= x <= 1 a predicate or a statement?
$begingroup$
If $x=3/2$ and $y= 2/3$ this is true, but if, for example, $x=7/2$, this is false $(21/4 ∉ Z)$. So this predicate sentence is not correct.
Is this method of proof good?
discrete-mathematics predicate-logic
New contributor
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
If $x=3/2$ and $y= 2/3$ this is true, but if, for example, $x=7/2$, this is false $(21/4 ∉ Z)$. So this predicate sentence is not correct.
Is this method of proof good?
discrete-mathematics predicate-logic
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Your ‘proof’ is false. For $x=7/2$, just take $y=2/7$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
yesterday
$begingroup$
But x * y = 7/2 * 2/7 = 1 and 1 ∈ Z, which is true
$endgroup$
– Code xD
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Yes, of course. So what?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
yesterday
$begingroup$
Yes, and... therefore...
$endgroup$
– Graham Kemp
yesterday
$begingroup$
My mistake, but if we take example x=8/2 and y= 2/7, then 16/14 ∉ Z . So this predicate sentence is not correct.
$endgroup$
– Code xD
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
If $x=3/2$ and $y= 2/3$ this is true, but if, for example, $x=7/2$, this is false $(21/4 ∉ Z)$. So this predicate sentence is not correct.
Is this method of proof good?
discrete-mathematics predicate-logic
New contributor
$endgroup$
If $x=3/2$ and $y= 2/3$ this is true, but if, for example, $x=7/2$, this is false $(21/4 ∉ Z)$. So this predicate sentence is not correct.
Is this method of proof good?
discrete-mathematics predicate-logic
discrete-mathematics predicate-logic
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
Eevee Trainer
7,61621338
7,61621338
New contributor
asked yesterday
Code xDCode xD
33
33
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Your ‘proof’ is false. For $x=7/2$, just take $y=2/7$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
yesterday
$begingroup$
But x * y = 7/2 * 2/7 = 1 and 1 ∈ Z, which is true
$endgroup$
– Code xD
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Yes, of course. So what?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
yesterday
$begingroup$
Yes, and... therefore...
$endgroup$
– Graham Kemp
yesterday
$begingroup$
My mistake, but if we take example x=8/2 and y= 2/7, then 16/14 ∉ Z . So this predicate sentence is not correct.
$endgroup$
– Code xD
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Your ‘proof’ is false. For $x=7/2$, just take $y=2/7$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
yesterday
$begingroup$
But x * y = 7/2 * 2/7 = 1 and 1 ∈ Z, which is true
$endgroup$
– Code xD
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Yes, of course. So what?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
yesterday
$begingroup$
Yes, and... therefore...
$endgroup$
– Graham Kemp
yesterday
$begingroup$
My mistake, but if we take example x=8/2 and y= 2/7, then 16/14 ∉ Z . So this predicate sentence is not correct.
$endgroup$
– Code xD
yesterday
$begingroup$
Your ‘proof’ is false. For $x=7/2$, just take $y=2/7$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
yesterday
$begingroup$
Your ‘proof’ is false. For $x=7/2$, just take $y=2/7$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
yesterday
$begingroup$
But x * y = 7/2 * 2/7 = 1 and 1 ∈ Z, which is true
$endgroup$
– Code xD
yesterday
$begingroup$
But x * y = 7/2 * 2/7 = 1 and 1 ∈ Z, which is true
$endgroup$
– Code xD
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
Yes, of course. So what?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
yesterday
$begingroup$
Yes, of course. So what?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
yesterday
$begingroup$
Yes, and... therefore...
$endgroup$
– Graham Kemp
yesterday
$begingroup$
Yes, and... therefore...
$endgroup$
– Graham Kemp
yesterday
$begingroup$
My mistake, but if we take example x=8/2 and y= 2/7, then 16/14 ∉ Z . So this predicate sentence is not correct.
$endgroup$
– Code xD
yesterday
$begingroup$
My mistake, but if we take example x=8/2 and y= 2/7, then 16/14 ∉ Z . So this predicate sentence is not correct.
$endgroup$
– Code xD
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The important thing about statements like $(forall x in mathbb{Q}) (exists y in mathbb{Q}): x times y in mathbb{Z}$ is that you can literally read them from left to right in order to understand what they say and how to prove/disprove them.
"For all $x$ in the rationals..." - so, we need to start with some arbitrary fraction $x$ which we have no control over - "... there exists $y$ in the rationals..." - next we get to pick any $y$ we choose (which may depend on $x$: we already have that available since it came earlier in the statement) - "... such that $x$ times $y$ is an integer." That is, finally we test the arbitrary $x$ we were given and the specific $y$ we chose to see if their product is an integer. If, for any possible $x$, we can pick a $y$ that makes it true, then the statement is true.
With that framework for the proof, can you show that the statement is true?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Code xD is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3139530%2fis-the-statement-%25e2%2588%2580x-%25e2%2588%2588-q%25e2%2588%2583y-%25e2%2588%2588-bbb-qx-cdot-y-%25e2%2588%2588-bbb-z-true%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The important thing about statements like $(forall x in mathbb{Q}) (exists y in mathbb{Q}): x times y in mathbb{Z}$ is that you can literally read them from left to right in order to understand what they say and how to prove/disprove them.
"For all $x$ in the rationals..." - so, we need to start with some arbitrary fraction $x$ which we have no control over - "... there exists $y$ in the rationals..." - next we get to pick any $y$ we choose (which may depend on $x$: we already have that available since it came earlier in the statement) - "... such that $x$ times $y$ is an integer." That is, finally we test the arbitrary $x$ we were given and the specific $y$ we chose to see if their product is an integer. If, for any possible $x$, we can pick a $y$ that makes it true, then the statement is true.
With that framework for the proof, can you show that the statement is true?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The important thing about statements like $(forall x in mathbb{Q}) (exists y in mathbb{Q}): x times y in mathbb{Z}$ is that you can literally read them from left to right in order to understand what they say and how to prove/disprove them.
"For all $x$ in the rationals..." - so, we need to start with some arbitrary fraction $x$ which we have no control over - "... there exists $y$ in the rationals..." - next we get to pick any $y$ we choose (which may depend on $x$: we already have that available since it came earlier in the statement) - "... such that $x$ times $y$ is an integer." That is, finally we test the arbitrary $x$ we were given and the specific $y$ we chose to see if their product is an integer. If, for any possible $x$, we can pick a $y$ that makes it true, then the statement is true.
With that framework for the proof, can you show that the statement is true?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The important thing about statements like $(forall x in mathbb{Q}) (exists y in mathbb{Q}): x times y in mathbb{Z}$ is that you can literally read them from left to right in order to understand what they say and how to prove/disprove them.
"For all $x$ in the rationals..." - so, we need to start with some arbitrary fraction $x$ which we have no control over - "... there exists $y$ in the rationals..." - next we get to pick any $y$ we choose (which may depend on $x$: we already have that available since it came earlier in the statement) - "... such that $x$ times $y$ is an integer." That is, finally we test the arbitrary $x$ we were given and the specific $y$ we chose to see if their product is an integer. If, for any possible $x$, we can pick a $y$ that makes it true, then the statement is true.
With that framework for the proof, can you show that the statement is true?
$endgroup$
The important thing about statements like $(forall x in mathbb{Q}) (exists y in mathbb{Q}): x times y in mathbb{Z}$ is that you can literally read them from left to right in order to understand what they say and how to prove/disprove them.
"For all $x$ in the rationals..." - so, we need to start with some arbitrary fraction $x$ which we have no control over - "... there exists $y$ in the rationals..." - next we get to pick any $y$ we choose (which may depend on $x$: we already have that available since it came earlier in the statement) - "... such that $x$ times $y$ is an integer." That is, finally we test the arbitrary $x$ we were given and the specific $y$ we chose to see if their product is an integer. If, for any possible $x$, we can pick a $y$ that makes it true, then the statement is true.
With that framework for the proof, can you show that the statement is true?
answered yesterday
ChessanatorChessanator
2,2081412
2,2081412
add a comment |
add a comment |
Code xD is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Code xD is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Code xD is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Code xD is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3139530%2fis-the-statement-%25e2%2588%2580x-%25e2%2588%2588-q%25e2%2588%2583y-%25e2%2588%2588-bbb-qx-cdot-y-%25e2%2588%2588-bbb-z-true%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Your ‘proof’ is false. For $x=7/2$, just take $y=2/7$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
yesterday
$begingroup$
But x * y = 7/2 * 2/7 = 1 and 1 ∈ Z, which is true
$endgroup$
– Code xD
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Yes, of course. So what?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
yesterday
$begingroup$
Yes, and... therefore...
$endgroup$
– Graham Kemp
yesterday
$begingroup$
My mistake, but if we take example x=8/2 and y= 2/7, then 16/14 ∉ Z . So this predicate sentence is not correct.
$endgroup$
– Code xD
yesterday