Proof of a basic geometrical aseveration [closed]proof that the three interior angles of a triangle is...
Look at your watch and tell me what time is it. vs Look at your watch and tell me what time it is
The difference between「N分で」and「後N分で」
What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?
Creature kill and resurrect effects on the stack interaction?
How to write cleanly even if my character uses expletive language?
My Graph Theory Students
Combining an idiom with a metonymy
Is a party consisting of only a bard, a cleric, and a warlock functional long-term?
Credit cards used everywhere in Singapore or Malaysia?
Co-worker team leader wants to inject his friend's awful software into our development. What should I say to our common boss?
Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats
If the DM rolls initiative once for a group of monsters, how do end-of-turn effects work?
Why doesn't the EU now just force the UK to choose between referendum and no-deal?
Are there verbs that are neither telic, or atelic?
What did Alexander Pope mean by "Expletives their feeble Aid do join"?
How to simplify this time periods definition interface?
SOQL: Populate a Literal List in WHERE IN Clause
How to deal with taxi scam when on vacation?
If I can solve Sudoku can I solve Travelling Salesman Problem(TSP)? If yes, how?
How to use deus ex machina safely?
Gantt Chart like rectangles with log scale
Unexpected result from ArcLength
Gravity magic - How does it work?
What approach do we need to follow for projects without a test environment?
Proof of a basic geometrical aseveration [closed]
proof that the three interior angles of a triangle is congruent to a straight line (without measurements)Prove that the straight line joining the middle point of the hypotenuse of a right angled triangle to the right angle is equal to half the hypotenuse.Prove vertical angles are congruent.Proof of SSS congruence theoremEquilateral triangle in SemicircularConvex Quad ProofFinding $s$ from the figure givenGeometrical proofKiselev's Geometry Problem 51Prove that, for any polygon, taking all pair of adjacent angles, subtracting 180 from their sum, and adding all the results together equals $180(n-4)$
$begingroup$
I'm starting to study geometry from 0%, and I want help to prove it:
"All pair of adjacent angles are too supplementary"
Thanks you.
geometry
edited Mar 10 at 23:11
Bernard
123k741116
asked Mar 10 at 23:01
Richard KingstonRichard Kingston
283
$endgroup$
closed as off-topic by Saad, Eevee Trainer, Parcly Taxel, Xander Henderson, Lord Shark the Unknown Mar 11 at 3:37
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Eevee Trainer, Xander Henderson
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm starting to study geometry from 0%, and I want help to prove it:
"All pair of adjacent angles are too supplementary"
Thanks you.
geometry
edited Mar 10 at 23:11
Bernard
123k741116
asked Mar 10 at 23:01
Richard KingstonRichard Kingston
283
$endgroup$
closed as off-topic by Saad, Eevee Trainer, Parcly Taxel, Xander Henderson, Lord Shark the Unknown Mar 11 at 3:37
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Eevee Trainer, Xander Henderson
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
$begingroup$
Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
$endgroup$
– Brian
Mar 10 at 23:07
1
$begingroup$
Also, assuming I understand your question correctly, the statements that "all pairs of adjacent angles are also supplementary" is false.
$endgroup$
– Brian
Mar 10 at 23:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm starting to study geometry from 0%, and I want help to prove it:
"All pair of adjacent angles are too supplementary"
Thanks you.
geometry
edited Mar 10 at 23:11
Bernard
123k741116
asked Mar 10 at 23:01
Richard KingstonRichard Kingston
283
$endgroup$
I'm starting to study geometry from 0%, and I want help to prove it:
"All pair of adjacent angles are too supplementary"
Thanks you.
geometry
geometry
edited Mar 10 at 23:11
Bernard
123k741116
asked Mar 10 at 23:01
Richard KingstonRichard Kingston
283
edited Mar 10 at 23:11
Bernard
123k741116
asked Mar 10 at 23:01
Richard KingstonRichard Kingston
283
edited Mar 10 at 23:11
Bernard
123k741116
edited Mar 10 at 23:11
Bernard
123k741116
edited Mar 10 at 23:11
Bernard
123k741116
123k741116
asked Mar 10 at 23:01
Richard KingstonRichard Kingston
283
asked Mar 10 at 23:01
Richard KingstonRichard Kingston
283
asked Mar 10 at 23:01
Richard KingstonRichard Kingston
283
283
closed as off-topic by Saad, Eevee Trainer, Parcly Taxel, Xander Henderson, Lord Shark the Unknown Mar 11 at 3:37
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Eevee Trainer, Xander Henderson
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as off-topic by Saad, Eevee Trainer, Parcly Taxel, Xander Henderson, Lord Shark the Unknown Mar 11 at 3:37
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Eevee Trainer, Xander Henderson
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
$begingroup$
Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
$endgroup$
– Brian
Mar 10 at 23:07
1
$begingroup$
Also, assuming I understand your question correctly, the statements that "all pairs of adjacent angles are also supplementary" is false.
$endgroup$
– Brian
Mar 10 at 23:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
$endgroup$
– Brian
Mar 10 at 23:07
1
$begingroup$
Also, assuming I understand your question correctly, the statements that "all pairs of adjacent angles are also supplementary" is false.
$endgroup$
– Brian
Mar 10 at 23:10
$begingroup$
Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
$endgroup$
– Brian
Mar 10 at 23:07
$begingroup$
Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
$endgroup$
– Brian
Mar 10 at 23:07
1
1
$begingroup$
Also, assuming I understand your question correctly, the statements that "all pairs of adjacent angles are also supplementary" is false.
$endgroup$
– Brian
Mar 10 at 23:10
$begingroup$
Also, assuming I understand your question correctly, the statements that "all pairs of adjacent angles are also supplementary" is false.
$endgroup$
– Brian
Mar 10 at 23:10
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
$endgroup$
– Brian
Mar 10 at 23:07
1
$begingroup$
Also, assuming I understand your question correctly, the statements that "all pairs of adjacent angles are also supplementary" is false.
$endgroup$
– Brian
Mar 10 at 23:10