is the real part of a holomorphic function holomorphic?real part of a holomorphic function from a...

What do Xenomorphs eat in the Alien series?

If I can solve Sudoku can I solve Travelling Salesman Problem(TSP)? If yes, how?

Why one should not leave fingerprints on bulbs and plugs?

Why is the President allowed to veto a cancellation of emergency powers?

How can I track script which gives me "command not found" right after the login?

Life insurance that covers only simultaneous/dual deaths

How difficult is it to simply disable/disengage the MCAS on Boeing 737 Max 8 & 9 Aircraft?

It's a yearly task, alright

How to write cleanly even if my character uses expletive language?

What are substitutions for coconut in curry?

What options are left, if Britain cannot decide?

Employee lack of ownership

Why would a flight no longer considered airworthy be redirected like this?

Why did it take so long to abandon sail after steamships were demonstrated?

Should we release the security issues we found in our product as CVE or we can just update those on weekly release notes?

Interplanetary conflict, some disease destroys the ability to understand or appreciate music

A link redirect to http instead of https: how critical is it?

Do I need life insurance if I can cover my own funeral costs?

How to deal with a cynical class?

The difference between「N分で」and「後N分で」

What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?

Professor being mistaken for a grad student

What's the meaning of “spike” in the context of “adrenaline spike”?

Happy pi day, everyone!



is the real part of a holomorphic function holomorphic?


real part of a holomorphic function from a PDEHolomorphic function with given real part on unit circleReal and imaginary part of holomorphic functionholomorphic function with real arguments smooth?proving that $f(z)=1/Gamma(z)$ is a entire functionEntire function doesn't cut real axis.Measure of set where holomorphic function is largeExample of entire function on $mathbb C$ such that which does not take only one value in $mathbb C$When is a real-valued continuous function on the unit circle the real part of a holomorphic function on the unit disk?bijective holomorphic entire functions













0












$begingroup$


Say we have some entire function $f:mathbb{C} rightarrow mathbb{C}$. Does this guarantee that the function $Re(f)$ will also be entire?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It will be entire iff $f$ is constant.
    $endgroup$
    – Severin Schraven
    Mar 10 at 22:07










  • $begingroup$
    Ah. Does this come from Cauchy Riemann equations or something different?
    $endgroup$
    – D.Dog
    Mar 10 at 22:08










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it exactly follows from Cauchy Riemann equations. If $f=u+iv$ is defined in an open connected domain and $v$ is constant then the partial derivatives of $v$ are zero everywhere. By Cauchy Riemann we conclude that the partial derivatives of $u$ are zero as well. So $f$ is constant.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    Mar 10 at 22:17












  • $begingroup$
    Could you explain why we require that v is constant for u to be holomorphic?
    $endgroup$
    – D.Dog
    Mar 10 at 22:18










  • $begingroup$
    The real part of $f$ has $0$ imaginary part. Apply C-R to $Re(f)$
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    Mar 10 at 22:20
















0












$begingroup$


Say we have some entire function $f:mathbb{C} rightarrow mathbb{C}$. Does this guarantee that the function $Re(f)$ will also be entire?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It will be entire iff $f$ is constant.
    $endgroup$
    – Severin Schraven
    Mar 10 at 22:07










  • $begingroup$
    Ah. Does this come from Cauchy Riemann equations or something different?
    $endgroup$
    – D.Dog
    Mar 10 at 22:08










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it exactly follows from Cauchy Riemann equations. If $f=u+iv$ is defined in an open connected domain and $v$ is constant then the partial derivatives of $v$ are zero everywhere. By Cauchy Riemann we conclude that the partial derivatives of $u$ are zero as well. So $f$ is constant.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    Mar 10 at 22:17












  • $begingroup$
    Could you explain why we require that v is constant for u to be holomorphic?
    $endgroup$
    – D.Dog
    Mar 10 at 22:18










  • $begingroup$
    The real part of $f$ has $0$ imaginary part. Apply C-R to $Re(f)$
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    Mar 10 at 22:20














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Say we have some entire function $f:mathbb{C} rightarrow mathbb{C}$. Does this guarantee that the function $Re(f)$ will also be entire?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Say we have some entire function $f:mathbb{C} rightarrow mathbb{C}$. Does this guarantee that the function $Re(f)$ will also be entire?







complex-analysis holomorphic-functions entire-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 10 at 22:26









José Carlos Santos

167k22132235




167k22132235










asked Mar 10 at 22:05









D.DogD.Dog

207




207












  • $begingroup$
    It will be entire iff $f$ is constant.
    $endgroup$
    – Severin Schraven
    Mar 10 at 22:07










  • $begingroup$
    Ah. Does this come from Cauchy Riemann equations or something different?
    $endgroup$
    – D.Dog
    Mar 10 at 22:08










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it exactly follows from Cauchy Riemann equations. If $f=u+iv$ is defined in an open connected domain and $v$ is constant then the partial derivatives of $v$ are zero everywhere. By Cauchy Riemann we conclude that the partial derivatives of $u$ are zero as well. So $f$ is constant.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    Mar 10 at 22:17












  • $begingroup$
    Could you explain why we require that v is constant for u to be holomorphic?
    $endgroup$
    – D.Dog
    Mar 10 at 22:18










  • $begingroup$
    The real part of $f$ has $0$ imaginary part. Apply C-R to $Re(f)$
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    Mar 10 at 22:20


















  • $begingroup$
    It will be entire iff $f$ is constant.
    $endgroup$
    – Severin Schraven
    Mar 10 at 22:07










  • $begingroup$
    Ah. Does this come from Cauchy Riemann equations or something different?
    $endgroup$
    – D.Dog
    Mar 10 at 22:08










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it exactly follows from Cauchy Riemann equations. If $f=u+iv$ is defined in an open connected domain and $v$ is constant then the partial derivatives of $v$ are zero everywhere. By Cauchy Riemann we conclude that the partial derivatives of $u$ are zero as well. So $f$ is constant.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    Mar 10 at 22:17












  • $begingroup$
    Could you explain why we require that v is constant for u to be holomorphic?
    $endgroup$
    – D.Dog
    Mar 10 at 22:18










  • $begingroup$
    The real part of $f$ has $0$ imaginary part. Apply C-R to $Re(f)$
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    Mar 10 at 22:20
















$begingroup$
It will be entire iff $f$ is constant.
$endgroup$
– Severin Schraven
Mar 10 at 22:07




$begingroup$
It will be entire iff $f$ is constant.
$endgroup$
– Severin Schraven
Mar 10 at 22:07












$begingroup$
Ah. Does this come from Cauchy Riemann equations or something different?
$endgroup$
– D.Dog
Mar 10 at 22:08




$begingroup$
Ah. Does this come from Cauchy Riemann equations or something different?
$endgroup$
– D.Dog
Mar 10 at 22:08












$begingroup$
Yes, it exactly follows from Cauchy Riemann equations. If $f=u+iv$ is defined in an open connected domain and $v$ is constant then the partial derivatives of $v$ are zero everywhere. By Cauchy Riemann we conclude that the partial derivatives of $u$ are zero as well. So $f$ is constant.
$endgroup$
– Mark
Mar 10 at 22:17






$begingroup$
Yes, it exactly follows from Cauchy Riemann equations. If $f=u+iv$ is defined in an open connected domain and $v$ is constant then the partial derivatives of $v$ are zero everywhere. By Cauchy Riemann we conclude that the partial derivatives of $u$ are zero as well. So $f$ is constant.
$endgroup$
– Mark
Mar 10 at 22:17














$begingroup$
Could you explain why we require that v is constant for u to be holomorphic?
$endgroup$
– D.Dog
Mar 10 at 22:18




$begingroup$
Could you explain why we require that v is constant for u to be holomorphic?
$endgroup$
– D.Dog
Mar 10 at 22:18












$begingroup$
The real part of $f$ has $0$ imaginary part. Apply C-R to $Re(f)$
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Mar 10 at 22:20




$begingroup$
The real part of $f$ has $0$ imaginary part. Apply C-R to $Re(f)$
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Mar 10 at 22:20










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The only entire holomorphic functions whose imaginary parts are constant are the constant functions. So $operatorname{Re}(f)$ is holomorphic if and only if it is constant (which implies that $f$ itself is constant).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I follow the first line but I don't understand why Re(f) being holomorphic requires that Im(f) is constant, could you explain?
    $endgroup$
    – D.Dog
    Mar 10 at 22:16










  • $begingroup$
    $Im(f)$ is not necessary constant. But $Im(Re(f))$ is constant because $Re(f)$ is always a real number. This is why $Re(f)$ being holomorphic implies that it is constant.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    Mar 10 at 22:19










  • $begingroup$
    ahhh of course. thanks for the explanation.
    $endgroup$
    – D.Dog
    Mar 10 at 22:20










  • $begingroup$
    But yes, after we found out that $Re(f)$ is constant then since $f$ is holomorphic with constant real part we conclude that $f$ is constant. So in the end $Im(f)$ is constant as well. But we conclude that only after we proved $Re(f)$ is constant.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    Mar 10 at 22:23





















3












$begingroup$

If $mathfrak{R}(f)$ is entire, then $exp(imathfrak{R}(f))$ is also entire. But $|exp(i mathfrak{R}(f))| leq 1$, so $exp(imathfrak{R}(f))$ is constant (Liouville's theorem) and thus so is $mathfrak{R}(f)$. Hence, $f$ has constant real part, and the C-R equations get you that $f$ has constant imaginary part as well.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3142977%2fis-the-real-part-of-a-holomorphic-function-holomorphic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    The only entire holomorphic functions whose imaginary parts are constant are the constant functions. So $operatorname{Re}(f)$ is holomorphic if and only if it is constant (which implies that $f$ itself is constant).






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I follow the first line but I don't understand why Re(f) being holomorphic requires that Im(f) is constant, could you explain?
      $endgroup$
      – D.Dog
      Mar 10 at 22:16










    • $begingroup$
      $Im(f)$ is not necessary constant. But $Im(Re(f))$ is constant because $Re(f)$ is always a real number. This is why $Re(f)$ being holomorphic implies that it is constant.
      $endgroup$
      – Mark
      Mar 10 at 22:19










    • $begingroup$
      ahhh of course. thanks for the explanation.
      $endgroup$
      – D.Dog
      Mar 10 at 22:20










    • $begingroup$
      But yes, after we found out that $Re(f)$ is constant then since $f$ is holomorphic with constant real part we conclude that $f$ is constant. So in the end $Im(f)$ is constant as well. But we conclude that only after we proved $Re(f)$ is constant.
      $endgroup$
      – Mark
      Mar 10 at 22:23


















    2












    $begingroup$

    The only entire holomorphic functions whose imaginary parts are constant are the constant functions. So $operatorname{Re}(f)$ is holomorphic if and only if it is constant (which implies that $f$ itself is constant).






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I follow the first line but I don't understand why Re(f) being holomorphic requires that Im(f) is constant, could you explain?
      $endgroup$
      – D.Dog
      Mar 10 at 22:16










    • $begingroup$
      $Im(f)$ is not necessary constant. But $Im(Re(f))$ is constant because $Re(f)$ is always a real number. This is why $Re(f)$ being holomorphic implies that it is constant.
      $endgroup$
      – Mark
      Mar 10 at 22:19










    • $begingroup$
      ahhh of course. thanks for the explanation.
      $endgroup$
      – D.Dog
      Mar 10 at 22:20










    • $begingroup$
      But yes, after we found out that $Re(f)$ is constant then since $f$ is holomorphic with constant real part we conclude that $f$ is constant. So in the end $Im(f)$ is constant as well. But we conclude that only after we proved $Re(f)$ is constant.
      $endgroup$
      – Mark
      Mar 10 at 22:23
















    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    The only entire holomorphic functions whose imaginary parts are constant are the constant functions. So $operatorname{Re}(f)$ is holomorphic if and only if it is constant (which implies that $f$ itself is constant).






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    The only entire holomorphic functions whose imaginary parts are constant are the constant functions. So $operatorname{Re}(f)$ is holomorphic if and only if it is constant (which implies that $f$ itself is constant).







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Mar 10 at 22:13









    José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

    167k22132235




    167k22132235












    • $begingroup$
      I follow the first line but I don't understand why Re(f) being holomorphic requires that Im(f) is constant, could you explain?
      $endgroup$
      – D.Dog
      Mar 10 at 22:16










    • $begingroup$
      $Im(f)$ is not necessary constant. But $Im(Re(f))$ is constant because $Re(f)$ is always a real number. This is why $Re(f)$ being holomorphic implies that it is constant.
      $endgroup$
      – Mark
      Mar 10 at 22:19










    • $begingroup$
      ahhh of course. thanks for the explanation.
      $endgroup$
      – D.Dog
      Mar 10 at 22:20










    • $begingroup$
      But yes, after we found out that $Re(f)$ is constant then since $f$ is holomorphic with constant real part we conclude that $f$ is constant. So in the end $Im(f)$ is constant as well. But we conclude that only after we proved $Re(f)$ is constant.
      $endgroup$
      – Mark
      Mar 10 at 22:23




















    • $begingroup$
      I follow the first line but I don't understand why Re(f) being holomorphic requires that Im(f) is constant, could you explain?
      $endgroup$
      – D.Dog
      Mar 10 at 22:16










    • $begingroup$
      $Im(f)$ is not necessary constant. But $Im(Re(f))$ is constant because $Re(f)$ is always a real number. This is why $Re(f)$ being holomorphic implies that it is constant.
      $endgroup$
      – Mark
      Mar 10 at 22:19










    • $begingroup$
      ahhh of course. thanks for the explanation.
      $endgroup$
      – D.Dog
      Mar 10 at 22:20










    • $begingroup$
      But yes, after we found out that $Re(f)$ is constant then since $f$ is holomorphic with constant real part we conclude that $f$ is constant. So in the end $Im(f)$ is constant as well. But we conclude that only after we proved $Re(f)$ is constant.
      $endgroup$
      – Mark
      Mar 10 at 22:23


















    $begingroup$
    I follow the first line but I don't understand why Re(f) being holomorphic requires that Im(f) is constant, could you explain?
    $endgroup$
    – D.Dog
    Mar 10 at 22:16




    $begingroup$
    I follow the first line but I don't understand why Re(f) being holomorphic requires that Im(f) is constant, could you explain?
    $endgroup$
    – D.Dog
    Mar 10 at 22:16












    $begingroup$
    $Im(f)$ is not necessary constant. But $Im(Re(f))$ is constant because $Re(f)$ is always a real number. This is why $Re(f)$ being holomorphic implies that it is constant.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    Mar 10 at 22:19




    $begingroup$
    $Im(f)$ is not necessary constant. But $Im(Re(f))$ is constant because $Re(f)$ is always a real number. This is why $Re(f)$ being holomorphic implies that it is constant.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    Mar 10 at 22:19












    $begingroup$
    ahhh of course. thanks for the explanation.
    $endgroup$
    – D.Dog
    Mar 10 at 22:20




    $begingroup$
    ahhh of course. thanks for the explanation.
    $endgroup$
    – D.Dog
    Mar 10 at 22:20












    $begingroup$
    But yes, after we found out that $Re(f)$ is constant then since $f$ is holomorphic with constant real part we conclude that $f$ is constant. So in the end $Im(f)$ is constant as well. But we conclude that only after we proved $Re(f)$ is constant.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    Mar 10 at 22:23






    $begingroup$
    But yes, after we found out that $Re(f)$ is constant then since $f$ is holomorphic with constant real part we conclude that $f$ is constant. So in the end $Im(f)$ is constant as well. But we conclude that only after we proved $Re(f)$ is constant.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    Mar 10 at 22:23













    3












    $begingroup$

    If $mathfrak{R}(f)$ is entire, then $exp(imathfrak{R}(f))$ is also entire. But $|exp(i mathfrak{R}(f))| leq 1$, so $exp(imathfrak{R}(f))$ is constant (Liouville's theorem) and thus so is $mathfrak{R}(f)$. Hence, $f$ has constant real part, and the C-R equations get you that $f$ has constant imaginary part as well.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      If $mathfrak{R}(f)$ is entire, then $exp(imathfrak{R}(f))$ is also entire. But $|exp(i mathfrak{R}(f))| leq 1$, so $exp(imathfrak{R}(f))$ is constant (Liouville's theorem) and thus so is $mathfrak{R}(f)$. Hence, $f$ has constant real part, and the C-R equations get you that $f$ has constant imaginary part as well.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        If $mathfrak{R}(f)$ is entire, then $exp(imathfrak{R}(f))$ is also entire. But $|exp(i mathfrak{R}(f))| leq 1$, so $exp(imathfrak{R}(f))$ is constant (Liouville's theorem) and thus so is $mathfrak{R}(f)$. Hence, $f$ has constant real part, and the C-R equations get you that $f$ has constant imaginary part as well.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        If $mathfrak{R}(f)$ is entire, then $exp(imathfrak{R}(f))$ is also entire. But $|exp(i mathfrak{R}(f))| leq 1$, so $exp(imathfrak{R}(f))$ is constant (Liouville's theorem) and thus so is $mathfrak{R}(f)$. Hence, $f$ has constant real part, and the C-R equations get you that $f$ has constant imaginary part as well.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 10 at 22:16









        rubikscube09rubikscube09

        1,556720




        1,556720






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3142977%2fis-the-real-part-of-a-holomorphic-function-holomorphic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Nidaros erkebispedøme

            Birsay

            Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...