Inverse Laplace transform of rational function The Next CEO of Stack OverflowFind the inverse...

Does higher Oxidation/ reduction potential translate to higher energy storage in battery?

how one can write a nice vector parser, something that does pgfvecparse{A=B-C; D=E x F;}

Reshaping json / reparing json inside shell script (remove trailing comma)

Why did early computer designers eschew integers?

Small nick on power cord from an electric alarm clock, and copper wiring exposed but intact

Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?

Raspberry pi 3 B with Ubuntu 18.04 server arm64: what chip

Is there a reasonable and studied concept of reduction between regular languages?

Is dried pee considered dirt?

What flight has the highest ratio of timezone difference to flight time?

My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to login to her iPad, do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?

IC has pull-down resistors on SMBus lines?

Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?

How can I make proper oatmeal cookies?

Cannot shrink btrfs filesystem although there is still data and metadata space left : ERROR: unable to resize '/home': No space left on device

(How) Could a medieval fantasy world survive a magic-induced "nuclear winter"?

Is fine stranded wire ok for main supply line?

Why am I getting "Static method cannot be referenced from a non static context: String String.valueOf(Object)"?

Is there such a thing as a proper verb, like a proper noun?

Is it ever safe to open a suspicious HTML file (e.g. email attachment)?

What is the process for purifying your home if you believe it may have been previously used for pagan worship?

Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"?

Calculate the Mean mean of two numbers

Why don't programming languages automatically manage the synchronous/asynchronous problem?



Inverse Laplace transform of rational function



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowFind the inverse Laplace transform $f(t)=L^{-1}left{F(s)right}$ of the function $F(s)=dfrac{7s−22}{s^2−6s+13}. $Inverse Laplace Transform of Reciprocal Quadratic FunctionInverse Laplace Transform,Inverse laplace transform with complex rootsInverse Laplace Transform of $frac{s-3}{s[(s-3)^2+9]}$Partial Fraction Decomposition for Laplace TransformLaplace Transform for solve ODE (RLC circuit)Using inverse Laplace transform to solve differential equationInverse laplace transform of $frac{1}{(s+a)(s+b)}$Inverse Laplace Transform of $s^{-2}(s^2 + 1)^{-1}$ Using Convolution Theorem?












0












$begingroup$


Is it true that the inverse Laplace transform of a proper rational function (where all the coefficients are real and positive),
begin{equation}
s mapsto frac{a_1 , s^{m-1} + a_2 , s^{m-2} + dotsb + a_{m}}{s^m + b_1 s^{m-1} + dotsb + b_{m}},
end{equation}

can be expressed as $langle b, e^{A t} b rangle$, for a matrix $A in mathbb R^{n times n}$ and a vector $b in mathbb R^n$ and $n geq m$?



I would say that it is and that the inverse can be calculated by partial fraction decomposition, inverse Laplace transform of the partial fractions, and using an ansatz of $A$ in normal Jordan form, but would like confirmation or a reference.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    We can always fill up $A$ and $b$ with as many zeros as we wish.
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 12 at 20:24










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, but I don't see your point?
    $endgroup$
    – Roberto Rastapopoulos
    Jan 12 at 20:25










  • $begingroup$
    We can make $n$ as large as we want. Isn't it the question?
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 12 at 20:27










  • $begingroup$
    The question is: Are there $A, b, n$ (with $n$ possibly larger than $m$), such that the Laplace transform of $<b, e^{-At} b>$ is the rational function given?
    $endgroup$
    – Roberto Rastapopoulos
    Jan 12 at 20:32










  • $begingroup$
    How do you think to write say $e^{-t}-e^{-2t}$ as $langle b,e^{At}brangle$? At $t=0$ it gives $|b|=0$. Do I miss something here?
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 12 at 21:23
















0












$begingroup$


Is it true that the inverse Laplace transform of a proper rational function (where all the coefficients are real and positive),
begin{equation}
s mapsto frac{a_1 , s^{m-1} + a_2 , s^{m-2} + dotsb + a_{m}}{s^m + b_1 s^{m-1} + dotsb + b_{m}},
end{equation}

can be expressed as $langle b, e^{A t} b rangle$, for a matrix $A in mathbb R^{n times n}$ and a vector $b in mathbb R^n$ and $n geq m$?



I would say that it is and that the inverse can be calculated by partial fraction decomposition, inverse Laplace transform of the partial fractions, and using an ansatz of $A$ in normal Jordan form, but would like confirmation or a reference.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    We can always fill up $A$ and $b$ with as many zeros as we wish.
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 12 at 20:24










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, but I don't see your point?
    $endgroup$
    – Roberto Rastapopoulos
    Jan 12 at 20:25










  • $begingroup$
    We can make $n$ as large as we want. Isn't it the question?
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 12 at 20:27










  • $begingroup$
    The question is: Are there $A, b, n$ (with $n$ possibly larger than $m$), such that the Laplace transform of $<b, e^{-At} b>$ is the rational function given?
    $endgroup$
    – Roberto Rastapopoulos
    Jan 12 at 20:32










  • $begingroup$
    How do you think to write say $e^{-t}-e^{-2t}$ as $langle b,e^{At}brangle$? At $t=0$ it gives $|b|=0$. Do I miss something here?
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 12 at 21:23














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Is it true that the inverse Laplace transform of a proper rational function (where all the coefficients are real and positive),
begin{equation}
s mapsto frac{a_1 , s^{m-1} + a_2 , s^{m-2} + dotsb + a_{m}}{s^m + b_1 s^{m-1} + dotsb + b_{m}},
end{equation}

can be expressed as $langle b, e^{A t} b rangle$, for a matrix $A in mathbb R^{n times n}$ and a vector $b in mathbb R^n$ and $n geq m$?



I would say that it is and that the inverse can be calculated by partial fraction decomposition, inverse Laplace transform of the partial fractions, and using an ansatz of $A$ in normal Jordan form, but would like confirmation or a reference.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is it true that the inverse Laplace transform of a proper rational function (where all the coefficients are real and positive),
begin{equation}
s mapsto frac{a_1 , s^{m-1} + a_2 , s^{m-2} + dotsb + a_{m}}{s^m + b_1 s^{m-1} + dotsb + b_{m}},
end{equation}

can be expressed as $langle b, e^{A t} b rangle$, for a matrix $A in mathbb R^{n times n}$ and a vector $b in mathbb R^n$ and $n geq m$?



I would say that it is and that the inverse can be calculated by partial fraction decomposition, inverse Laplace transform of the partial fractions, and using an ansatz of $A$ in normal Jordan form, but would like confirmation or a reference.







laplace-transform






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 17 at 17:22







Roberto Rastapopoulos

















asked Jan 12 at 20:07









Roberto RastapopoulosRoberto Rastapopoulos

950425




950425












  • $begingroup$
    We can always fill up $A$ and $b$ with as many zeros as we wish.
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 12 at 20:24










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, but I don't see your point?
    $endgroup$
    – Roberto Rastapopoulos
    Jan 12 at 20:25










  • $begingroup$
    We can make $n$ as large as we want. Isn't it the question?
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 12 at 20:27










  • $begingroup$
    The question is: Are there $A, b, n$ (with $n$ possibly larger than $m$), such that the Laplace transform of $<b, e^{-At} b>$ is the rational function given?
    $endgroup$
    – Roberto Rastapopoulos
    Jan 12 at 20:32










  • $begingroup$
    How do you think to write say $e^{-t}-e^{-2t}$ as $langle b,e^{At}brangle$? At $t=0$ it gives $|b|=0$. Do I miss something here?
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 12 at 21:23


















  • $begingroup$
    We can always fill up $A$ and $b$ with as many zeros as we wish.
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 12 at 20:24










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, but I don't see your point?
    $endgroup$
    – Roberto Rastapopoulos
    Jan 12 at 20:25










  • $begingroup$
    We can make $n$ as large as we want. Isn't it the question?
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 12 at 20:27










  • $begingroup$
    The question is: Are there $A, b, n$ (with $n$ possibly larger than $m$), such that the Laplace transform of $<b, e^{-At} b>$ is the rational function given?
    $endgroup$
    – Roberto Rastapopoulos
    Jan 12 at 20:32










  • $begingroup$
    How do you think to write say $e^{-t}-e^{-2t}$ as $langle b,e^{At}brangle$? At $t=0$ it gives $|b|=0$. Do I miss something here?
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 12 at 21:23
















$begingroup$
We can always fill up $A$ and $b$ with as many zeros as we wish.
$endgroup$
– A.Γ.
Jan 12 at 20:24




$begingroup$
We can always fill up $A$ and $b$ with as many zeros as we wish.
$endgroup$
– A.Γ.
Jan 12 at 20:24












$begingroup$
Yes, but I don't see your point?
$endgroup$
– Roberto Rastapopoulos
Jan 12 at 20:25




$begingroup$
Yes, but I don't see your point?
$endgroup$
– Roberto Rastapopoulos
Jan 12 at 20:25












$begingroup$
We can make $n$ as large as we want. Isn't it the question?
$endgroup$
– A.Γ.
Jan 12 at 20:27




$begingroup$
We can make $n$ as large as we want. Isn't it the question?
$endgroup$
– A.Γ.
Jan 12 at 20:27












$begingroup$
The question is: Are there $A, b, n$ (with $n$ possibly larger than $m$), such that the Laplace transform of $<b, e^{-At} b>$ is the rational function given?
$endgroup$
– Roberto Rastapopoulos
Jan 12 at 20:32




$begingroup$
The question is: Are there $A, b, n$ (with $n$ possibly larger than $m$), such that the Laplace transform of $<b, e^{-At} b>$ is the rational function given?
$endgroup$
– Roberto Rastapopoulos
Jan 12 at 20:32












$begingroup$
How do you think to write say $e^{-t}-e^{-2t}$ as $langle b,e^{At}brangle$? At $t=0$ it gives $|b|=0$. Do I miss something here?
$endgroup$
– A.Γ.
Jan 12 at 21:23




$begingroup$
How do you think to write say $e^{-t}-e^{-2t}$ as $langle b,e^{At}brangle$? At $t=0$ it gives $|b|=0$. Do I miss something here?
$endgroup$
– A.Γ.
Jan 12 at 21:23










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071327%2finverse-laplace-transform-of-rational-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071327%2finverse-laplace-transform-of-rational-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Nidaros erkebispedøme

Birsay

Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...