Is the statement $(∀x ∈ Q)(∃y ∈ Bbb Q)(x cdot y ∈ Bbb Z)$ true?Predicate and Statementwhat is the...

Should I apply for my boss's promotion?

How can I portion out frozen cookie dough?

Cross out words with overlapping to nearby words

An Undercover Army

Having the player face themselves after the mid-game

Generating a list with duplicate entries

Vector-transposing function

Professor forcing me to attend a conference, I can't afford even with 50% funding

Can a space-faring robot still function over a billion years?

Computation logic of Partway in TikZ

Use Mercury as quenching liquid for swords?

Why aren't there more Gauls like Obelix?

Cycles on the torus

Help! My Character is too much for her story!

Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?

Is it a Cyclops number? "Nobody" knows!

What do you call someone who likes to pick fights?

Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?

Is there a math expression equivalent to the conditional ternary operator?

What is Tony Stark injecting into himself in Iron Man 3?

The (Easy) Road to Code

Observable universe radius for distant observers

Short story about an infectious indestructible metal bar?

Boss Telling direct supervisor I snitched



Is the statement $(∀x ∈ Q)(∃y ∈ Bbb Q)(x cdot y ∈ Bbb Z)$ true?


Predicate and Statementwhat is the meaning of this predicate statementWhat is a predicate exactly in predicate logic?Finding an interpretation that makes a formula truePredicate and quantifiers_discreteDiscrete Mathematics, Predicates and Negationpredicate logic - function mapping outside of domainabout counter-example for Quantifier based statement (logic)Does ∧ still mean intersection when using predicate logic?Is 2 <= x <= 1 a predicate or a statement?













0












$begingroup$


If $x=3/2$ and $y= 2/3$ this is true, but if, for example, $x=7/2$, this is false $(21/4 ∉ Z)$. So this predicate sentence is not correct.



Is this method of proof good?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Code xD is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Your ‘proof’ is false. For $x=7/2$, just take $y=2/7$.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    But x * y = 7/2 * 2/7 = 1 and 1 ∈ Z, which is true
    $endgroup$
    – Code xD
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, of course. So what?
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, and... therefore...
    $endgroup$
    – Graham Kemp
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    My mistake, but if we take example x=8/2 and y= 2/7, then 16/14 ∉ Z . So this predicate sentence is not correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Code xD
    yesterday
















0












$begingroup$


If $x=3/2$ and $y= 2/3$ this is true, but if, for example, $x=7/2$, this is false $(21/4 ∉ Z)$. So this predicate sentence is not correct.



Is this method of proof good?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Code xD is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Your ‘proof’ is false. For $x=7/2$, just take $y=2/7$.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    But x * y = 7/2 * 2/7 = 1 and 1 ∈ Z, which is true
    $endgroup$
    – Code xD
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, of course. So what?
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, and... therefore...
    $endgroup$
    – Graham Kemp
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    My mistake, but if we take example x=8/2 and y= 2/7, then 16/14 ∉ Z . So this predicate sentence is not correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Code xD
    yesterday














0












0








0





$begingroup$


If $x=3/2$ and $y= 2/3$ this is true, but if, for example, $x=7/2$, this is false $(21/4 ∉ Z)$. So this predicate sentence is not correct.



Is this method of proof good?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Code xD is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




If $x=3/2$ and $y= 2/3$ this is true, but if, for example, $x=7/2$, this is false $(21/4 ∉ Z)$. So this predicate sentence is not correct.



Is this method of proof good?







discrete-mathematics predicate-logic






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Code xD is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Code xD is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Eevee Trainer

7,61621338




7,61621338






New contributor




Code xD is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Code xDCode xD

33




33




New contributor




Code xD is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Code xD is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Code xD is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    Your ‘proof’ is false. For $x=7/2$, just take $y=2/7$.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    But x * y = 7/2 * 2/7 = 1 and 1 ∈ Z, which is true
    $endgroup$
    – Code xD
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, of course. So what?
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, and... therefore...
    $endgroup$
    – Graham Kemp
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    My mistake, but if we take example x=8/2 and y= 2/7, then 16/14 ∉ Z . So this predicate sentence is not correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Code xD
    yesterday


















  • $begingroup$
    Your ‘proof’ is false. For $x=7/2$, just take $y=2/7$.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    But x * y = 7/2 * 2/7 = 1 and 1 ∈ Z, which is true
    $endgroup$
    – Code xD
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, of course. So what?
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, and... therefore...
    $endgroup$
    – Graham Kemp
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    My mistake, but if we take example x=8/2 and y= 2/7, then 16/14 ∉ Z . So this predicate sentence is not correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Code xD
    yesterday
















$begingroup$
Your ‘proof’ is false. For $x=7/2$, just take $y=2/7$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
yesterday






$begingroup$
Your ‘proof’ is false. For $x=7/2$, just take $y=2/7$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
yesterday














$begingroup$
But x * y = 7/2 * 2/7 = 1 and 1 ∈ Z, which is true
$endgroup$
– Code xD
yesterday




$begingroup$
But x * y = 7/2 * 2/7 = 1 and 1 ∈ Z, which is true
$endgroup$
– Code xD
yesterday




1




1




$begingroup$
Yes, of course. So what?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
yesterday




$begingroup$
Yes, of course. So what?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
yesterday












$begingroup$
Yes, and... therefore...
$endgroup$
– Graham Kemp
yesterday




$begingroup$
Yes, and... therefore...
$endgroup$
– Graham Kemp
yesterday












$begingroup$
My mistake, but if we take example x=8/2 and y= 2/7, then 16/14 ∉ Z . So this predicate sentence is not correct.
$endgroup$
– Code xD
yesterday




$begingroup$
My mistake, but if we take example x=8/2 and y= 2/7, then 16/14 ∉ Z . So this predicate sentence is not correct.
$endgroup$
– Code xD
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The important thing about statements like $(forall x in mathbb{Q}) (exists y in mathbb{Q}): x times y in mathbb{Z}$ is that you can literally read them from left to right in order to understand what they say and how to prove/disprove them.




"For all $x$ in the rationals..." - so, we need to start with some arbitrary fraction $x$ which we have no control over - "... there exists $y$ in the rationals..." - next we get to pick any $y$ we choose (which may depend on $x$: we already have that available since it came earlier in the statement) - "... such that $x$ times $y$ is an integer." That is, finally we test the arbitrary $x$ we were given and the specific $y$ we chose to see if their product is an integer. If, for any possible $x$, we can pick a $y$ that makes it true, then the statement is true.




With that framework for the proof, can you show that the statement is true?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Code xD is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3139530%2fis-the-statement-%25e2%2588%2580x-%25e2%2588%2588-q%25e2%2588%2583y-%25e2%2588%2588-bbb-qx-cdot-y-%25e2%2588%2588-bbb-z-true%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    The important thing about statements like $(forall x in mathbb{Q}) (exists y in mathbb{Q}): x times y in mathbb{Z}$ is that you can literally read them from left to right in order to understand what they say and how to prove/disprove them.




    "For all $x$ in the rationals..." - so, we need to start with some arbitrary fraction $x$ which we have no control over - "... there exists $y$ in the rationals..." - next we get to pick any $y$ we choose (which may depend on $x$: we already have that available since it came earlier in the statement) - "... such that $x$ times $y$ is an integer." That is, finally we test the arbitrary $x$ we were given and the specific $y$ we chose to see if their product is an integer. If, for any possible $x$, we can pick a $y$ that makes it true, then the statement is true.




    With that framework for the proof, can you show that the statement is true?






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      The important thing about statements like $(forall x in mathbb{Q}) (exists y in mathbb{Q}): x times y in mathbb{Z}$ is that you can literally read them from left to right in order to understand what they say and how to prove/disprove them.




      "For all $x$ in the rationals..." - so, we need to start with some arbitrary fraction $x$ which we have no control over - "... there exists $y$ in the rationals..." - next we get to pick any $y$ we choose (which may depend on $x$: we already have that available since it came earlier in the statement) - "... such that $x$ times $y$ is an integer." That is, finally we test the arbitrary $x$ we were given and the specific $y$ we chose to see if their product is an integer. If, for any possible $x$, we can pick a $y$ that makes it true, then the statement is true.




      With that framework for the proof, can you show that the statement is true?






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        The important thing about statements like $(forall x in mathbb{Q}) (exists y in mathbb{Q}): x times y in mathbb{Z}$ is that you can literally read them from left to right in order to understand what they say and how to prove/disprove them.




        "For all $x$ in the rationals..." - so, we need to start with some arbitrary fraction $x$ which we have no control over - "... there exists $y$ in the rationals..." - next we get to pick any $y$ we choose (which may depend on $x$: we already have that available since it came earlier in the statement) - "... such that $x$ times $y$ is an integer." That is, finally we test the arbitrary $x$ we were given and the specific $y$ we chose to see if their product is an integer. If, for any possible $x$, we can pick a $y$ that makes it true, then the statement is true.




        With that framework for the proof, can you show that the statement is true?






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The important thing about statements like $(forall x in mathbb{Q}) (exists y in mathbb{Q}): x times y in mathbb{Z}$ is that you can literally read them from left to right in order to understand what they say and how to prove/disprove them.




        "For all $x$ in the rationals..." - so, we need to start with some arbitrary fraction $x$ which we have no control over - "... there exists $y$ in the rationals..." - next we get to pick any $y$ we choose (which may depend on $x$: we already have that available since it came earlier in the statement) - "... such that $x$ times $y$ is an integer." That is, finally we test the arbitrary $x$ we were given and the specific $y$ we chose to see if their product is an integer. If, for any possible $x$, we can pick a $y$ that makes it true, then the statement is true.




        With that framework for the proof, can you show that the statement is true?







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        ChessanatorChessanator

        2,2081412




        2,2081412






















            Code xD is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Code xD is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Code xD is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Code xD is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3139530%2fis-the-statement-%25e2%2588%2580x-%25e2%2588%2588-q%25e2%2588%2583y-%25e2%2588%2588-bbb-qx-cdot-y-%25e2%2588%2588-bbb-z-true%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Nidaros erkebispedøme

            Birsay

            Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...