Is there a name for this formula/distribution: $f(i) = ( a / i^k ) b^i$? Announcing the...

First console to have temporary backward compatibility

Is it ethical to give a final exam after the professor has quit before teaching the remaining chapters of the course?

Is "Reachable Object" really an NP-complete problem?

How come Sam didn't become Lord of Horn Hill?

Old style "caution" boxes

Why didn't Eitri join the fight?

Do wooden building fires get hotter than 600°C?

What is the meaning of the new sigil in Game of Thrones Season 8 intro?

Trademark violation for app?

Chinese Seal on silk painting - what does it mean?

Most bit efficient text communication method?

Is grep documentation wrong?

Compare a given version number in the form major.minor.build.patch and see if one is less than the other

Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?

If a VARCHAR(MAX) column is included in an index, is the entire value always stored in the index page(s)?

What is the meaning of the simile “quick as silk”?

What does this Jacques Hadamard quote mean?

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

Can anything be seen from the center of the Boötes void? How dark would it be?

Can a party unilaterally change candidates in preparation for a General election?

How to Make a Beautiful Stacked 3D Plot

Wu formula for manifolds with boundary

Is there a kind of relay only consumes power when switching?



Is there a name for this formula/distribution: $f(i) = ( a / i^k ) b^i$?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Proper name for this distribution typeIs there a name for this relationship?Is there a name for this family of probability distributions?Is there a standard name for this semigroup?Is there a name for this discrete probability distribution?Is there a name for this partial order between metrics?Is there a name for this result in planar geometry?Is there a formal name for this “weighted probability distribution”?Is there a name for this inequality?Is there a name for this graph?












5












$begingroup$


My apologies if this is a naive question but does anyone happen to know if the equation below (and/or the distribution it describes) is commonly know by a specific name?




$f(i) = ( a / i^k ) b^i$



(where $a$, $b$ and $k$ are constants; and, FWIW, for my purposes $i$ should be a positive integer denoting rank according to frequency)




This equation appears in Simon (1955), but he doesn't give it a specific name and always refers to it by its example number in his paper.



This is not my field so I'm not familiar with the relevant literature so I don't know how often this particular distribution crops up and if it is common enough to warrant a specific name (pointers to places where it does appear would also be appreciated though!).



The same formula is also mentioned in Tambovtsev & Martindale (2007), who call it a "Yule distribution" but, as far as I can glean, this seems wrong since it appears "Yule(-Simon)" refers to a different distribution; T&M seem to have mislabelled it based on a careless reading of Simon, who does indeed mention the above equation in the proximity of a discussion of Yule (1924).



Instead, Simon cites Champernowne (1953) for this equation; however, calling it a "Champernowne distribution" doesn't seem appropriate either since, isn't that already the name for a different distribution?



Help, comments and corrections would be gratefully appreciated!



References



Champernowne, D. G. 1953. A Model of Income Distribution. The Economic Journal 63(250): 318–51



Simon, H. A. 1955. On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika 42(3–4). 425–40.



Tambovtsev, Y. A. & C. Martindale. 2007. Phoneme frequencies follow a Yule distribution. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 4(2). 1–11.



Yule, G. U. 1924. A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of Dr J. C. Willis, F.R.S. Philosophical Transactions B 213(21).










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    5












    $begingroup$


    My apologies if this is a naive question but does anyone happen to know if the equation below (and/or the distribution it describes) is commonly know by a specific name?




    $f(i) = ( a / i^k ) b^i$



    (where $a$, $b$ and $k$ are constants; and, FWIW, for my purposes $i$ should be a positive integer denoting rank according to frequency)




    This equation appears in Simon (1955), but he doesn't give it a specific name and always refers to it by its example number in his paper.



    This is not my field so I'm not familiar with the relevant literature so I don't know how often this particular distribution crops up and if it is common enough to warrant a specific name (pointers to places where it does appear would also be appreciated though!).



    The same formula is also mentioned in Tambovtsev & Martindale (2007), who call it a "Yule distribution" but, as far as I can glean, this seems wrong since it appears "Yule(-Simon)" refers to a different distribution; T&M seem to have mislabelled it based on a careless reading of Simon, who does indeed mention the above equation in the proximity of a discussion of Yule (1924).



    Instead, Simon cites Champernowne (1953) for this equation; however, calling it a "Champernowne distribution" doesn't seem appropriate either since, isn't that already the name for a different distribution?



    Help, comments and corrections would be gratefully appreciated!



    References



    Champernowne, D. G. 1953. A Model of Income Distribution. The Economic Journal 63(250): 318–51



    Simon, H. A. 1955. On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika 42(3–4). 425–40.



    Tambovtsev, Y. A. & C. Martindale. 2007. Phoneme frequencies follow a Yule distribution. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 4(2). 1–11.



    Yule, G. U. 1924. A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of Dr J. C. Willis, F.R.S. Philosophical Transactions B 213(21).










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      5












      5








      5


      2



      $begingroup$


      My apologies if this is a naive question but does anyone happen to know if the equation below (and/or the distribution it describes) is commonly know by a specific name?




      $f(i) = ( a / i^k ) b^i$



      (where $a$, $b$ and $k$ are constants; and, FWIW, for my purposes $i$ should be a positive integer denoting rank according to frequency)




      This equation appears in Simon (1955), but he doesn't give it a specific name and always refers to it by its example number in his paper.



      This is not my field so I'm not familiar with the relevant literature so I don't know how often this particular distribution crops up and if it is common enough to warrant a specific name (pointers to places where it does appear would also be appreciated though!).



      The same formula is also mentioned in Tambovtsev & Martindale (2007), who call it a "Yule distribution" but, as far as I can glean, this seems wrong since it appears "Yule(-Simon)" refers to a different distribution; T&M seem to have mislabelled it based on a careless reading of Simon, who does indeed mention the above equation in the proximity of a discussion of Yule (1924).



      Instead, Simon cites Champernowne (1953) for this equation; however, calling it a "Champernowne distribution" doesn't seem appropriate either since, isn't that already the name for a different distribution?



      Help, comments and corrections would be gratefully appreciated!



      References



      Champernowne, D. G. 1953. A Model of Income Distribution. The Economic Journal 63(250): 318–51



      Simon, H. A. 1955. On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika 42(3–4). 425–40.



      Tambovtsev, Y. A. & C. Martindale. 2007. Phoneme frequencies follow a Yule distribution. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 4(2). 1–11.



      Yule, G. U. 1924. A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of Dr J. C. Willis, F.R.S. Philosophical Transactions B 213(21).










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      My apologies if this is a naive question but does anyone happen to know if the equation below (and/or the distribution it describes) is commonly know by a specific name?




      $f(i) = ( a / i^k ) b^i$



      (where $a$, $b$ and $k$ are constants; and, FWIW, for my purposes $i$ should be a positive integer denoting rank according to frequency)




      This equation appears in Simon (1955), but he doesn't give it a specific name and always refers to it by its example number in his paper.



      This is not my field so I'm not familiar with the relevant literature so I don't know how often this particular distribution crops up and if it is common enough to warrant a specific name (pointers to places where it does appear would also be appreciated though!).



      The same formula is also mentioned in Tambovtsev & Martindale (2007), who call it a "Yule distribution" but, as far as I can glean, this seems wrong since it appears "Yule(-Simon)" refers to a different distribution; T&M seem to have mislabelled it based on a careless reading of Simon, who does indeed mention the above equation in the proximity of a discussion of Yule (1924).



      Instead, Simon cites Champernowne (1953) for this equation; however, calling it a "Champernowne distribution" doesn't seem appropriate either since, isn't that already the name for a different distribution?



      Help, comments and corrections would be gratefully appreciated!



      References



      Champernowne, D. G. 1953. A Model of Income Distribution. The Economic Journal 63(250): 318–51



      Simon, H. A. 1955. On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika 42(3–4). 425–40.



      Tambovtsev, Y. A. & C. Martindale. 2007. Phoneme frequencies follow a Yule distribution. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 4(2). 1–11.



      Yule, G. U. 1924. A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of Dr J. C. Willis, F.R.S. Philosophical Transactions B 213(21).







      probability-distributions reference-request terminology






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 26 at 10:20







      Miztli

















      asked Mar 24 at 20:24









      MiztliMiztli

      1286




      1286






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2





          +100







          $begingroup$

          As far as I can tell, it doesn't quite have a name, but perhaps the following makes sense? The logarithmic distribution has pmf
          begin{align*}
          p(i) = -frac{1}{log(1-p)}frac{p^i}{i}
          end{align*}

          So this would be a special case when $k = 1$ in your parametrization, and $a$ is then determined to ensure the pmf sums to 1. The reason for this name is because the pmf is derived from the series expansion of the logarithmic function. In your formulation, the pmf would indeed equal
          begin{align*}
          p(i) = text{Li}_{k}(b) frac{b^i}{i^k}
          end{align*}

          Hence, if we would to continue the tradition of naming distributions based off series expansions from which they are derived, this could be called the "Polylogarithmic distribution". No results show up when I google this, though.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for this! I've managed to find uses of "polylogarithmic distribution" in the wild so it seems there is precedent in the literature to use this name. For example, if you look at this (appliedprobability.org/data/files/TMS%20articles/20_2_4.pdf) paper, equation (4) looks equivalent to the equation in my question (i.e. (1.1) in Simon 1955) and he uses the name "polylogarithmic distribution" to refer to it in the rest of the paper.
            $endgroup$
            – Miztli
            Apr 3 at 14:15










          • $begingroup$
            Ah, when I include quotes, I do find some results now. Thank you, and happy to help!
            $endgroup$
            – Tom Chen
            Apr 4 at 11:56



















          2












          $begingroup$

          Assuming that $a$ is a normalization constant, the formula
          $$
          label{eq:original}tag{1}
          f(i) = frac{ab^i}{i^k}
          $$

          is mentioned by Good (1953, eqn 54) as a generalization of the Zipf distribution
          $$
          f(i) = frac{a}{i^k}.
          $$

          (Good stipulates $0 < b < 1$ and calls $b^i$ a "convergence factor".) There is precedent in the literature for calling ($ref{eq:original}$) the "Good distribution": see Zörnig & Altmann (1995) and Eeg-Olofsson (2008).



          A more general form,
          $$
          f(i) = frac{ab^i}{(nu + i)^k},
          $$

          has been dubbed the "Lerch distribution" (Zörnig & Altmann 1995; Klar, Parthasarathy & Henze 2010, p. 130), as the normalization constant is related to the Lerch transcendent.



          I can't think of an obvious/objective criterion for choosing between "Good distribution" and "polylogarithmic distribution" (Tom Chen's answer; Kemp 1995) – while both names appear in the literature, the references are so few it's not clear that one name should be favoured over the other. Perhaps one could call it the Good–Kemp distribution?



          References



          Eeg-Olofsson, M. (2008) Why is the Good distribution so good? Towards an explanation of word length regularity. Lund University Department of Linguistics and Phonetics Working Papers, 53, 15–21. https://journals.lub.lu.se/LWPL/article/view/2270/1845



          Good, I. J. (1953) The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika, 40, 237–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/40.3-4.237



          Kemp, A. W. (1995) Splitters, lumpers and species per genus. Mathematical Scientist, 20, 107–118. http://www.appliedprobability.org/data/files/TMS%20articles/20_2_4.pdf



          Klar, B., Parthasarathy, P. R. & Henze, N. (2010) Zipf and Lerch limit of birth and death processes. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 24, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269964809990179



          Zörnig, P. & Altmann, G. (1995) Unified representation of Zipf distributions. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 19, 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9473(94)00009-8






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161008%2fis-there-a-name-for-this-formula-distribution-fi-a-ik-bi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2





            +100







            $begingroup$

            As far as I can tell, it doesn't quite have a name, but perhaps the following makes sense? The logarithmic distribution has pmf
            begin{align*}
            p(i) = -frac{1}{log(1-p)}frac{p^i}{i}
            end{align*}

            So this would be a special case when $k = 1$ in your parametrization, and $a$ is then determined to ensure the pmf sums to 1. The reason for this name is because the pmf is derived from the series expansion of the logarithmic function. In your formulation, the pmf would indeed equal
            begin{align*}
            p(i) = text{Li}_{k}(b) frac{b^i}{i^k}
            end{align*}

            Hence, if we would to continue the tradition of naming distributions based off series expansions from which they are derived, this could be called the "Polylogarithmic distribution". No results show up when I google this, though.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for this! I've managed to find uses of "polylogarithmic distribution" in the wild so it seems there is precedent in the literature to use this name. For example, if you look at this (appliedprobability.org/data/files/TMS%20articles/20_2_4.pdf) paper, equation (4) looks equivalent to the equation in my question (i.e. (1.1) in Simon 1955) and he uses the name "polylogarithmic distribution" to refer to it in the rest of the paper.
              $endgroup$
              – Miztli
              Apr 3 at 14:15










            • $begingroup$
              Ah, when I include quotes, I do find some results now. Thank you, and happy to help!
              $endgroup$
              – Tom Chen
              Apr 4 at 11:56
















            2





            +100







            $begingroup$

            As far as I can tell, it doesn't quite have a name, but perhaps the following makes sense? The logarithmic distribution has pmf
            begin{align*}
            p(i) = -frac{1}{log(1-p)}frac{p^i}{i}
            end{align*}

            So this would be a special case when $k = 1$ in your parametrization, and $a$ is then determined to ensure the pmf sums to 1. The reason for this name is because the pmf is derived from the series expansion of the logarithmic function. In your formulation, the pmf would indeed equal
            begin{align*}
            p(i) = text{Li}_{k}(b) frac{b^i}{i^k}
            end{align*}

            Hence, if we would to continue the tradition of naming distributions based off series expansions from which they are derived, this could be called the "Polylogarithmic distribution". No results show up when I google this, though.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for this! I've managed to find uses of "polylogarithmic distribution" in the wild so it seems there is precedent in the literature to use this name. For example, if you look at this (appliedprobability.org/data/files/TMS%20articles/20_2_4.pdf) paper, equation (4) looks equivalent to the equation in my question (i.e. (1.1) in Simon 1955) and he uses the name "polylogarithmic distribution" to refer to it in the rest of the paper.
              $endgroup$
              – Miztli
              Apr 3 at 14:15










            • $begingroup$
              Ah, when I include quotes, I do find some results now. Thank you, and happy to help!
              $endgroup$
              – Tom Chen
              Apr 4 at 11:56














            2





            +100







            2





            +100



            2




            +100



            $begingroup$

            As far as I can tell, it doesn't quite have a name, but perhaps the following makes sense? The logarithmic distribution has pmf
            begin{align*}
            p(i) = -frac{1}{log(1-p)}frac{p^i}{i}
            end{align*}

            So this would be a special case when $k = 1$ in your parametrization, and $a$ is then determined to ensure the pmf sums to 1. The reason for this name is because the pmf is derived from the series expansion of the logarithmic function. In your formulation, the pmf would indeed equal
            begin{align*}
            p(i) = text{Li}_{k}(b) frac{b^i}{i^k}
            end{align*}

            Hence, if we would to continue the tradition of naming distributions based off series expansions from which they are derived, this could be called the "Polylogarithmic distribution". No results show up when I google this, though.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            As far as I can tell, it doesn't quite have a name, but perhaps the following makes sense? The logarithmic distribution has pmf
            begin{align*}
            p(i) = -frac{1}{log(1-p)}frac{p^i}{i}
            end{align*}

            So this would be a special case when $k = 1$ in your parametrization, and $a$ is then determined to ensure the pmf sums to 1. The reason for this name is because the pmf is derived from the series expansion of the logarithmic function. In your formulation, the pmf would indeed equal
            begin{align*}
            p(i) = text{Li}_{k}(b) frac{b^i}{i^k}
            end{align*}

            Hence, if we would to continue the tradition of naming distributions based off series expansions from which they are derived, this could be called the "Polylogarithmic distribution". No results show up when I google this, though.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Apr 2 at 15:40

























            answered Apr 2 at 14:06









            Tom ChenTom Chen

            2,088715




            2,088715












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for this! I've managed to find uses of "polylogarithmic distribution" in the wild so it seems there is precedent in the literature to use this name. For example, if you look at this (appliedprobability.org/data/files/TMS%20articles/20_2_4.pdf) paper, equation (4) looks equivalent to the equation in my question (i.e. (1.1) in Simon 1955) and he uses the name "polylogarithmic distribution" to refer to it in the rest of the paper.
              $endgroup$
              – Miztli
              Apr 3 at 14:15










            • $begingroup$
              Ah, when I include quotes, I do find some results now. Thank you, and happy to help!
              $endgroup$
              – Tom Chen
              Apr 4 at 11:56


















            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for this! I've managed to find uses of "polylogarithmic distribution" in the wild so it seems there is precedent in the literature to use this name. For example, if you look at this (appliedprobability.org/data/files/TMS%20articles/20_2_4.pdf) paper, equation (4) looks equivalent to the equation in my question (i.e. (1.1) in Simon 1955) and he uses the name "polylogarithmic distribution" to refer to it in the rest of the paper.
              $endgroup$
              – Miztli
              Apr 3 at 14:15










            • $begingroup$
              Ah, when I include quotes, I do find some results now. Thank you, and happy to help!
              $endgroup$
              – Tom Chen
              Apr 4 at 11:56
















            $begingroup$
            Thank you for this! I've managed to find uses of "polylogarithmic distribution" in the wild so it seems there is precedent in the literature to use this name. For example, if you look at this (appliedprobability.org/data/files/TMS%20articles/20_2_4.pdf) paper, equation (4) looks equivalent to the equation in my question (i.e. (1.1) in Simon 1955) and he uses the name "polylogarithmic distribution" to refer to it in the rest of the paper.
            $endgroup$
            – Miztli
            Apr 3 at 14:15




            $begingroup$
            Thank you for this! I've managed to find uses of "polylogarithmic distribution" in the wild so it seems there is precedent in the literature to use this name. For example, if you look at this (appliedprobability.org/data/files/TMS%20articles/20_2_4.pdf) paper, equation (4) looks equivalent to the equation in my question (i.e. (1.1) in Simon 1955) and he uses the name "polylogarithmic distribution" to refer to it in the rest of the paper.
            $endgroup$
            – Miztli
            Apr 3 at 14:15












            $begingroup$
            Ah, when I include quotes, I do find some results now. Thank you, and happy to help!
            $endgroup$
            – Tom Chen
            Apr 4 at 11:56




            $begingroup$
            Ah, when I include quotes, I do find some results now. Thank you, and happy to help!
            $endgroup$
            – Tom Chen
            Apr 4 at 11:56











            2












            $begingroup$

            Assuming that $a$ is a normalization constant, the formula
            $$
            label{eq:original}tag{1}
            f(i) = frac{ab^i}{i^k}
            $$

            is mentioned by Good (1953, eqn 54) as a generalization of the Zipf distribution
            $$
            f(i) = frac{a}{i^k}.
            $$

            (Good stipulates $0 < b < 1$ and calls $b^i$ a "convergence factor".) There is precedent in the literature for calling ($ref{eq:original}$) the "Good distribution": see Zörnig & Altmann (1995) and Eeg-Olofsson (2008).



            A more general form,
            $$
            f(i) = frac{ab^i}{(nu + i)^k},
            $$

            has been dubbed the "Lerch distribution" (Zörnig & Altmann 1995; Klar, Parthasarathy & Henze 2010, p. 130), as the normalization constant is related to the Lerch transcendent.



            I can't think of an obvious/objective criterion for choosing between "Good distribution" and "polylogarithmic distribution" (Tom Chen's answer; Kemp 1995) – while both names appear in the literature, the references are so few it's not clear that one name should be favoured over the other. Perhaps one could call it the Good–Kemp distribution?



            References



            Eeg-Olofsson, M. (2008) Why is the Good distribution so good? Towards an explanation of word length regularity. Lund University Department of Linguistics and Phonetics Working Papers, 53, 15–21. https://journals.lub.lu.se/LWPL/article/view/2270/1845



            Good, I. J. (1953) The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika, 40, 237–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/40.3-4.237



            Kemp, A. W. (1995) Splitters, lumpers and species per genus. Mathematical Scientist, 20, 107–118. http://www.appliedprobability.org/data/files/TMS%20articles/20_2_4.pdf



            Klar, B., Parthasarathy, P. R. & Henze, N. (2010) Zipf and Lerch limit of birth and death processes. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 24, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269964809990179



            Zörnig, P. & Altmann, G. (1995) Unified representation of Zipf distributions. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 19, 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9473(94)00009-8






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              Assuming that $a$ is a normalization constant, the formula
              $$
              label{eq:original}tag{1}
              f(i) = frac{ab^i}{i^k}
              $$

              is mentioned by Good (1953, eqn 54) as a generalization of the Zipf distribution
              $$
              f(i) = frac{a}{i^k}.
              $$

              (Good stipulates $0 < b < 1$ and calls $b^i$ a "convergence factor".) There is precedent in the literature for calling ($ref{eq:original}$) the "Good distribution": see Zörnig & Altmann (1995) and Eeg-Olofsson (2008).



              A more general form,
              $$
              f(i) = frac{ab^i}{(nu + i)^k},
              $$

              has been dubbed the "Lerch distribution" (Zörnig & Altmann 1995; Klar, Parthasarathy & Henze 2010, p. 130), as the normalization constant is related to the Lerch transcendent.



              I can't think of an obvious/objective criterion for choosing between "Good distribution" and "polylogarithmic distribution" (Tom Chen's answer; Kemp 1995) – while both names appear in the literature, the references are so few it's not clear that one name should be favoured over the other. Perhaps one could call it the Good–Kemp distribution?



              References



              Eeg-Olofsson, M. (2008) Why is the Good distribution so good? Towards an explanation of word length regularity. Lund University Department of Linguistics and Phonetics Working Papers, 53, 15–21. https://journals.lub.lu.se/LWPL/article/view/2270/1845



              Good, I. J. (1953) The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika, 40, 237–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/40.3-4.237



              Kemp, A. W. (1995) Splitters, lumpers and species per genus. Mathematical Scientist, 20, 107–118. http://www.appliedprobability.org/data/files/TMS%20articles/20_2_4.pdf



              Klar, B., Parthasarathy, P. R. & Henze, N. (2010) Zipf and Lerch limit of birth and death processes. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 24, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269964809990179



              Zörnig, P. & Altmann, G. (1995) Unified representation of Zipf distributions. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 19, 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9473(94)00009-8






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                Assuming that $a$ is a normalization constant, the formula
                $$
                label{eq:original}tag{1}
                f(i) = frac{ab^i}{i^k}
                $$

                is mentioned by Good (1953, eqn 54) as a generalization of the Zipf distribution
                $$
                f(i) = frac{a}{i^k}.
                $$

                (Good stipulates $0 < b < 1$ and calls $b^i$ a "convergence factor".) There is precedent in the literature for calling ($ref{eq:original}$) the "Good distribution": see Zörnig & Altmann (1995) and Eeg-Olofsson (2008).



                A more general form,
                $$
                f(i) = frac{ab^i}{(nu + i)^k},
                $$

                has been dubbed the "Lerch distribution" (Zörnig & Altmann 1995; Klar, Parthasarathy & Henze 2010, p. 130), as the normalization constant is related to the Lerch transcendent.



                I can't think of an obvious/objective criterion for choosing between "Good distribution" and "polylogarithmic distribution" (Tom Chen's answer; Kemp 1995) – while both names appear in the literature, the references are so few it's not clear that one name should be favoured over the other. Perhaps one could call it the Good–Kemp distribution?



                References



                Eeg-Olofsson, M. (2008) Why is the Good distribution so good? Towards an explanation of word length regularity. Lund University Department of Linguistics and Phonetics Working Papers, 53, 15–21. https://journals.lub.lu.se/LWPL/article/view/2270/1845



                Good, I. J. (1953) The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika, 40, 237–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/40.3-4.237



                Kemp, A. W. (1995) Splitters, lumpers and species per genus. Mathematical Scientist, 20, 107–118. http://www.appliedprobability.org/data/files/TMS%20articles/20_2_4.pdf



                Klar, B., Parthasarathy, P. R. & Henze, N. (2010) Zipf and Lerch limit of birth and death processes. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 24, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269964809990179



                Zörnig, P. & Altmann, G. (1995) Unified representation of Zipf distributions. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 19, 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9473(94)00009-8






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Assuming that $a$ is a normalization constant, the formula
                $$
                label{eq:original}tag{1}
                f(i) = frac{ab^i}{i^k}
                $$

                is mentioned by Good (1953, eqn 54) as a generalization of the Zipf distribution
                $$
                f(i) = frac{a}{i^k}.
                $$

                (Good stipulates $0 < b < 1$ and calls $b^i$ a "convergence factor".) There is precedent in the literature for calling ($ref{eq:original}$) the "Good distribution": see Zörnig & Altmann (1995) and Eeg-Olofsson (2008).



                A more general form,
                $$
                f(i) = frac{ab^i}{(nu + i)^k},
                $$

                has been dubbed the "Lerch distribution" (Zörnig & Altmann 1995; Klar, Parthasarathy & Henze 2010, p. 130), as the normalization constant is related to the Lerch transcendent.



                I can't think of an obvious/objective criterion for choosing between "Good distribution" and "polylogarithmic distribution" (Tom Chen's answer; Kemp 1995) – while both names appear in the literature, the references are so few it's not clear that one name should be favoured over the other. Perhaps one could call it the Good–Kemp distribution?



                References



                Eeg-Olofsson, M. (2008) Why is the Good distribution so good? Towards an explanation of word length regularity. Lund University Department of Linguistics and Phonetics Working Papers, 53, 15–21. https://journals.lub.lu.se/LWPL/article/view/2270/1845



                Good, I. J. (1953) The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika, 40, 237–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/40.3-4.237



                Kemp, A. W. (1995) Splitters, lumpers and species per genus. Mathematical Scientist, 20, 107–118. http://www.appliedprobability.org/data/files/TMS%20articles/20_2_4.pdf



                Klar, B., Parthasarathy, P. R. & Henze, N. (2010) Zipf and Lerch limit of birth and death processes. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 24, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269964809990179



                Zörnig, P. & Altmann, G. (1995) Unified representation of Zipf distributions. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 19, 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9473(94)00009-8







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Apr 4 at 20:52









                KahoviusKahovius

                211




                211






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161008%2fis-there-a-name-for-this-formula-distribution-fi-a-ik-bi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Nidaros erkebispedøme

                    Birsay

                    Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...