Recursive calls to a function - why is the address of the parameter passed to it lowering with each call? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience The Ask Question Wizard is Live!What is the direction of stack growth in most modern systems?Why isn't sizeof for a struct equal to the sum of sizeof of each member?How to call a parent class function from derived class function?Why do we need virtual functions in C++?Pretty-print C++ STL containersHow to pass normal param as well as template param in a template function in C++?Are the days of passing const std::string & as a parameter over?Recursive Reverse FunctionWhy can I not move unique_ptr from a set to a function argument using an iterator?Why can I not call reserve on a vector of const elements?Having issues with .h file, it doesn't seem to be linking correctly

Etymology of 見舞い

Putting Ant-Man on house arrest

Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?

2 sample t test for sample sizes - 30,000 and 150,000

Can this water damage be explained by lack of gutters and grading issues?

Why these surprising proportionalities of integrals involving odd zeta values?

What is the definining line between a helicopter and a drone a person can ride in?

When does Bran Stark remember Jamie pushing him?

Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll?

tabularx column has extra padding at right?

How to make an animal which can only breed for a certain number of generations?

Is Bran literally the world's memory?

What were wait-states, and why was it only an issue for PCs?

Assertions In A Mock Callout Test

How to leave only the following strings?

lm and glm function in R

How to get a single big right brace?

Does Prince Arnaud cause someone holding the Princess to lose?

Why do some non-religious people reject artificial consciousness?

Marquee sign letters

How to charge percentage of transaction cost?

Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?

What is the difference between 准时 and 按时?

Can a Wizard take the Magic Initiate feat and select spells from the Wizard list?



Recursive calls to a function - why is the address of the parameter passed to it lowering with each call?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!What is the direction of stack growth in most modern systems?Why isn't sizeof for a struct equal to the sum of sizeof of each member?How to call a parent class function from derived class function?Why do we need virtual functions in C++?Pretty-print C++ STL containersHow to pass normal param as well as template param in a template function in C++?Are the days of passing const std::string & as a parameter over?Recursive Reverse FunctionWhy can I not move unique_ptr from a set to a function argument using an iterator?Why can I not call reserve on a vector of const elements?Having issues with .h file, it doesn't seem to be linking correctly



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








8















Consider following code:



#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void test_func(int address)
cout<<&address<<" ";
if(address < 0x7FFBEE26)
test_func(address);


int main()

test_func(512);
cout<<"Hello";
return 0;



Hello from main() is certainly not reached, since the recursive calls to test_func never end.



However, from what I can see in the cout present in test_func - the addresses being printed are lower and lower with each iteration. Why is that happening?










share|improve this question









New contributor




tears allo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 2





    You are passing a copy - that has to have an address

    – UnholySheep
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    Remember that the default stack size on linux is 10MB and its 1 MB on windows. Also the stack need not be in the same location each time you run your program.

    – drescherjm
    4 hours ago












  • I can't understand why this isn't eligible for tail-call optimization. The invocation of test_func is the last line in the function...

    – cyberbisson
    4 hours ago







  • 4





    @cyberbisson The parameters of the nested invocations of test_func must appear to have different addresses per language rules, and because the address of address was passed to operator<< the compiler can't prove that this is unobservable.

    – T.C.
    3 hours ago











  • @T.C. So, the problem is that the callee might remember and use it still?

    – Deduplicator
    2 hours ago

















8















Consider following code:



#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void test_func(int address)
cout<<&address<<" ";
if(address < 0x7FFBEE26)
test_func(address);


int main()

test_func(512);
cout<<"Hello";
return 0;



Hello from main() is certainly not reached, since the recursive calls to test_func never end.



However, from what I can see in the cout present in test_func - the addresses being printed are lower and lower with each iteration. Why is that happening?










share|improve this question









New contributor




tears allo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 2





    You are passing a copy - that has to have an address

    – UnholySheep
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    Remember that the default stack size on linux is 10MB and its 1 MB on windows. Also the stack need not be in the same location each time you run your program.

    – drescherjm
    4 hours ago












  • I can't understand why this isn't eligible for tail-call optimization. The invocation of test_func is the last line in the function...

    – cyberbisson
    4 hours ago







  • 4





    @cyberbisson The parameters of the nested invocations of test_func must appear to have different addresses per language rules, and because the address of address was passed to operator<< the compiler can't prove that this is unobservable.

    – T.C.
    3 hours ago











  • @T.C. So, the problem is that the callee might remember and use it still?

    – Deduplicator
    2 hours ago













8












8








8








Consider following code:



#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void test_func(int address)
cout<<&address<<" ";
if(address < 0x7FFBEE26)
test_func(address);


int main()

test_func(512);
cout<<"Hello";
return 0;



Hello from main() is certainly not reached, since the recursive calls to test_func never end.



However, from what I can see in the cout present in test_func - the addresses being printed are lower and lower with each iteration. Why is that happening?










share|improve this question









New contributor




tears allo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Consider following code:



#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void test_func(int address)
cout<<&address<<" ";
if(address < 0x7FFBEE26)
test_func(address);


int main()

test_func(512);
cout<<"Hello";
return 0;



Hello from main() is certainly not reached, since the recursive calls to test_func never end.



However, from what I can see in the cout present in test_func - the addresses being printed are lower and lower with each iteration. Why is that happening?







c++






share|improve this question









New contributor




tears allo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




tears allo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









drescherjm

6,59923553




6,59923553






New contributor




tears allo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 5 hours ago









tears allotears allo

441




441




New contributor




tears allo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





tears allo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






tears allo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 2





    You are passing a copy - that has to have an address

    – UnholySheep
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    Remember that the default stack size on linux is 10MB and its 1 MB on windows. Also the stack need not be in the same location each time you run your program.

    – drescherjm
    4 hours ago












  • I can't understand why this isn't eligible for tail-call optimization. The invocation of test_func is the last line in the function...

    – cyberbisson
    4 hours ago







  • 4





    @cyberbisson The parameters of the nested invocations of test_func must appear to have different addresses per language rules, and because the address of address was passed to operator<< the compiler can't prove that this is unobservable.

    – T.C.
    3 hours ago











  • @T.C. So, the problem is that the callee might remember and use it still?

    – Deduplicator
    2 hours ago












  • 2





    You are passing a copy - that has to have an address

    – UnholySheep
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    Remember that the default stack size on linux is 10MB and its 1 MB on windows. Also the stack need not be in the same location each time you run your program.

    – drescherjm
    4 hours ago












  • I can't understand why this isn't eligible for tail-call optimization. The invocation of test_func is the last line in the function...

    – cyberbisson
    4 hours ago







  • 4





    @cyberbisson The parameters of the nested invocations of test_func must appear to have different addresses per language rules, and because the address of address was passed to operator<< the compiler can't prove that this is unobservable.

    – T.C.
    3 hours ago











  • @T.C. So, the problem is that the callee might remember and use it still?

    – Deduplicator
    2 hours ago







2




2





You are passing a copy - that has to have an address

– UnholySheep
4 hours ago





You are passing a copy - that has to have an address

– UnholySheep
4 hours ago




1




1





Remember that the default stack size on linux is 10MB and its 1 MB on windows. Also the stack need not be in the same location each time you run your program.

– drescherjm
4 hours ago






Remember that the default stack size on linux is 10MB and its 1 MB on windows. Also the stack need not be in the same location each time you run your program.

– drescherjm
4 hours ago














I can't understand why this isn't eligible for tail-call optimization. The invocation of test_func is the last line in the function...

– cyberbisson
4 hours ago






I can't understand why this isn't eligible for tail-call optimization. The invocation of test_func is the last line in the function...

– cyberbisson
4 hours ago





4




4





@cyberbisson The parameters of the nested invocations of test_func must appear to have different addresses per language rules, and because the address of address was passed to operator<< the compiler can't prove that this is unobservable.

– T.C.
3 hours ago





@cyberbisson The parameters of the nested invocations of test_func must appear to have different addresses per language rules, and because the address of address was passed to operator<< the compiler can't prove that this is unobservable.

– T.C.
3 hours ago













@T.C. So, the problem is that the callee might remember and use it still?

– Deduplicator
2 hours ago





@T.C. So, the problem is that the callee might remember and use it still?

– Deduplicator
2 hours ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















15














Likely address is being placed on the stack and, on your platform, the stack grows downward in memory. See this question about stack growth direction for more.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    tears allo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55800947%2frecursive-calls-to-a-function-why-is-the-address-of-the-parameter-passed-to-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    15














    Likely address is being placed on the stack and, on your platform, the stack grows downward in memory. See this question about stack growth direction for more.






    share|improve this answer



























      15














      Likely address is being placed on the stack and, on your platform, the stack grows downward in memory. See this question about stack growth direction for more.






      share|improve this answer

























        15












        15








        15







        Likely address is being placed on the stack and, on your platform, the stack grows downward in memory. See this question about stack growth direction for more.






        share|improve this answer













        Likely address is being placed on the stack and, on your platform, the stack grows downward in memory. See this question about stack growth direction for more.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        David SchwartzDavid Schwartz

        140k14146232




        140k14146232






















            tears allo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            tears allo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            tears allo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            tears allo is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55800947%2frecursive-calls-to-a-function-why-is-the-address-of-the-parameter-passed-to-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Nidaros erkebispedøme

            Birsay

            Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...