GNS representation of a nuclear $C^*$-algebra The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results...

Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?

Origin of "cooter" meaning "vagina"

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

The difference between dialogue marks

What is the meaning of the verb "bear" in this context?

Reference request: Oldest number theory books with (unsolved) exercises?

Can you compress metal and what would be the consequences?

Output the Arecibo Message

Ubuntu Server install with full GUI

FPGA - DIY Programming

Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?

Delete all lines which don't have n characters before delimiter

What did it mean to "align" a radio?

What is the closest word meaning "respect for time / mindful"

Am I thawing this London Broil safely?

How to save as into a customized destination on macOS?

What is the most effective way of iterating a std::vector and why?

How come people say “Would of”?

Is there a symbol for a right arrow with a square in the middle?

Are there incongruent pythagorean triangles with the same perimeter and same area?

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

Feature engineering suggestion required

How to type this arrow in math mode?

Did 3000BC Egyptians use meteoric iron weapons?



GNS representation of a nuclear $C^*$-algebra



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InDoes an irreducible operator generate a nuclear $C^{*}$-algebra?Non-existence Tracial statesA proposition about residually finite dimensional C*-algebraGNS construction: Finding a representationGNS construction and separability.GNS representation doubttracial state on a unital infinite dimensional simple $C^*$ algebrasimple nuclear $C^*$ algebraconnection between unital $C^*$ algebra and finite von neumann algebraGNS representation












1












$begingroup$


Suppose $A$ is a nuclear $C^*$-algebra with a tracial state $psi$, $(pi_{psi},H_{psi})$ is the GNS reprsentation with respect to $psi$.



My question:



Does there exist $A$ which satisfy the above condition and $A/ker(pi_{psi})=K(H)$, where $H$ is separable and infinite dimensional.



Can anyone show me an example? Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Suppose $A$ is a nuclear $C^*$-algebra with a tracial state $psi$, $(pi_{psi},H_{psi})$ is the GNS reprsentation with respect to $psi$.



    My question:



    Does there exist $A$ which satisfy the above condition and $A/ker(pi_{psi})=K(H)$, where $H$ is separable and infinite dimensional.



    Can anyone show me an example? Thanks!










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Suppose $A$ is a nuclear $C^*$-algebra with a tracial state $psi$, $(pi_{psi},H_{psi})$ is the GNS reprsentation with respect to $psi$.



      My question:



      Does there exist $A$ which satisfy the above condition and $A/ker(pi_{psi})=K(H)$, where $H$ is separable and infinite dimensional.



      Can anyone show me an example? Thanks!










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Suppose $A$ is a nuclear $C^*$-algebra with a tracial state $psi$, $(pi_{psi},H_{psi})$ is the GNS reprsentation with respect to $psi$.



      My question:



      Does there exist $A$ which satisfy the above condition and $A/ker(pi_{psi})=K(H)$, where $H$ is separable and infinite dimensional.



      Can anyone show me an example? Thanks!







      functional-analysis operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 21 at 17:03









      Andrews

      1,2812423




      1,2812423










      asked Mar 21 at 15:46









      mathrookiemathrookie

      936512




      936512






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          No, if $psine 0$. You can define a state on $A/kerpi_psi$ by
          $$
          tildepsi(a+kerpi_psi)=psi(a).
          $$

          This is well-defined since $psi=0$ on $kerpi_psi$. So $psi$ is a tracial state on $A/kerpi_psi$. And $K(H)$ does not admit a tracial state.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156984%2fgns-representation-of-a-nuclear-c-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            No, if $psine 0$. You can define a state on $A/kerpi_psi$ by
            $$
            tildepsi(a+kerpi_psi)=psi(a).
            $$

            This is well-defined since $psi=0$ on $kerpi_psi$. So $psi$ is a tracial state on $A/kerpi_psi$. And $K(H)$ does not admit a tracial state.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              No, if $psine 0$. You can define a state on $A/kerpi_psi$ by
              $$
              tildepsi(a+kerpi_psi)=psi(a).
              $$

              This is well-defined since $psi=0$ on $kerpi_psi$. So $psi$ is a tracial state on $A/kerpi_psi$. And $K(H)$ does not admit a tracial state.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                No, if $psine 0$. You can define a state on $A/kerpi_psi$ by
                $$
                tildepsi(a+kerpi_psi)=psi(a).
                $$

                This is well-defined since $psi=0$ on $kerpi_psi$. So $psi$ is a tracial state on $A/kerpi_psi$. And $K(H)$ does not admit a tracial state.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                No, if $psine 0$. You can define a state on $A/kerpi_psi$ by
                $$
                tildepsi(a+kerpi_psi)=psi(a).
                $$

                This is well-defined since $psi=0$ on $kerpi_psi$. So $psi$ is a tracial state on $A/kerpi_psi$. And $K(H)$ does not admit a tracial state.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 21 at 18:29









                Martin ArgeramiMartin Argerami

                129k1184185




                129k1184185






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3156984%2fgns-representation-of-a-nuclear-c-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Nidaros erkebispedøme

                    Birsay

                    Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...