Typesetting a double Over Dot on top of a symbolSingle dot textual formFixing quirky typesetting in plot labelsAn issue with formulas typesetting in Grid & ColumnTypesetting - entering derivative in traditional formTypesetting helpTypesetting for different powersTypesetting a formulaWhy doesn't the keyboard shortcut Insert->Typesetting->Nudge Up work for x[Prime]?Typesetting text with mathHow to stop font size reduction in typesetting fractions and sub- and superscripts
Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?
What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files
Could Giant Ground Sloths have been a good pack animal for the ancient Mayans?
Information to fellow intern about hiring?
Why airport relocation isn't done gradually?
What is GPS' 19 year rollover and does it present a cybersecurity issue?
What does 'script /dev/null' do?
Prime joint compound before latex paint?
What to wear for invited talk in Canada
What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?
How to deal with fear of taking dependencies
How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?
If a centaur druid Wild Shapes into a Giant Elk, do their Charge features stack?
Doomsday-clock for my fantasy planet
COUNT(*) or MAX(id) - which is faster?
Can I legally use front facing blue light in the UK?
"listening to me about as much as you're listening to this pole here"
Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?
Need help identifying/translating a plaque in Tangier, Morocco
extract characters between two commas?
Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?
How can I add custom success page
Manga about a female worker who got dragged into another world together with this high school girl and she was just told she's not needed anymore
Why do we use polarized capacitors?
Typesetting a double Over Dot on top of a symbol
Single dot textual formFixing quirky typesetting in plot labelsAn issue with formulas typesetting in Grid & ColumnTypesetting - entering derivative in traditional formTypesetting helpTypesetting for different powersTypesetting a formulaWhy doesn't the keyboard shortcut Insert->Typesetting->Nudge Up work for x[Prime]?Typesetting text with mathHow to stop font size reduction in typesetting fractions and sub- and superscripts
$begingroup$
I wanted to make a notation with a double dot over a symbol in Mathematica. Searching online or in the documentation did not yield any results. However, just randomly attempting to give a second parameter to the OverDot
function surprisingly did exactly what I needed:
I assume the red font suggests that Mathematica perceives this as a syntax mistake at some level, even though the output is as desired. Unfortunately, this does not work for three dots and more.
Is there a proper way to do this without red font appearing?
formatting
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I wanted to make a notation with a double dot over a symbol in Mathematica. Searching online or in the documentation did not yield any results. However, just randomly attempting to give a second parameter to the OverDot
function surprisingly did exactly what I needed:
I assume the red font suggests that Mathematica perceives this as a syntax mistake at some level, even though the output is as desired. Unfortunately, this does not work for three dots and more.
Is there a proper way to do this without red font appearing?
formatting
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Overscript[x, ".."], Overscript[x, "..."], Overscript[x, "[Ellipsis]"]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
The code editor and documentation are not always completely in sync with the actual typesetting. This is only one of several examples. Ignore the code coloring.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
54 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I wanted to make a notation with a double dot over a symbol in Mathematica. Searching online or in the documentation did not yield any results. However, just randomly attempting to give a second parameter to the OverDot
function surprisingly did exactly what I needed:
I assume the red font suggests that Mathematica perceives this as a syntax mistake at some level, even though the output is as desired. Unfortunately, this does not work for three dots and more.
Is there a proper way to do this without red font appearing?
formatting
$endgroup$
I wanted to make a notation with a double dot over a symbol in Mathematica. Searching online or in the documentation did not yield any results. However, just randomly attempting to give a second parameter to the OverDot
function surprisingly did exactly what I needed:
I assume the red font suggests that Mathematica perceives this as a syntax mistake at some level, even though the output is as desired. Unfortunately, this does not work for three dots and more.
Is there a proper way to do this without red font appearing?
formatting
formatting
asked 2 hours ago
KagaratschKagaratsch
4,79631348
4,79631348
1
$begingroup$
Overscript[x, ".."], Overscript[x, "..."], Overscript[x, "[Ellipsis]"]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
The code editor and documentation are not always completely in sync with the actual typesetting. This is only one of several examples. Ignore the code coloring.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
54 mins ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Overscript[x, ".."], Overscript[x, "..."], Overscript[x, "[Ellipsis]"]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
The code editor and documentation are not always completely in sync with the actual typesetting. This is only one of several examples. Ignore the code coloring.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
54 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Overscript[x, ".."], Overscript[x, "..."], Overscript[x, "[Ellipsis]"]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Overscript[x, ".."], Overscript[x, "..."], Overscript[x, "[Ellipsis]"]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
1 hour ago
2
2
$begingroup$
The code editor and documentation are not always completely in sync with the actual typesetting. This is only one of several examples. Ignore the code coloring.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
54 mins ago
$begingroup$
The code editor and documentation are not always completely in sync with the actual typesetting. This is only one of several examples. Ignore the code coloring.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
54 mins ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Use ToBoxes
to find the boxes generated for OverDot[x, 2]
:
OverDot[x,2] //ToBoxes
OverscriptBox["x", "¨"]
You can reproduce these boxes using Overscript:
Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "¨"]
You can use the same approach for triple dots:
Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "[TripleDot]"]
For more dots, you will have to use a different mechanism to generate the dots, e.g.:
Overscript[x, Style[Row[".",".",".","."],FontTracking->"Condensed"]]
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could fix the syntax highlighting, or ignore it. Here's a fix:
SyntaxInformation[OverDot] = "ArgumentsPattern" -> _, _.;
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Go to the Basic math assistant palette and click on the template.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
There indeed is a [DoubleDot] template, but it actually leads to an expression with the FullFormOverDot[X,2]
! So the syntax is in fact intended, then I'm confused why Mathematica marks it in red font when typed in directly?
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes... confusing. The documentation forOverDot
shows only one argument... so the $2$ is somehow treated extraneously. (Perhaps a bug report is in order.)
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194850%2ftypesetting-a-double-over-dot-on-top-of-a-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Use ToBoxes
to find the boxes generated for OverDot[x, 2]
:
OverDot[x,2] //ToBoxes
OverscriptBox["x", "¨"]
You can reproduce these boxes using Overscript:
Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "¨"]
You can use the same approach for triple dots:
Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "[TripleDot]"]
For more dots, you will have to use a different mechanism to generate the dots, e.g.:
Overscript[x, Style[Row[".",".",".","."],FontTracking->"Condensed"]]
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Use ToBoxes
to find the boxes generated for OverDot[x, 2]
:
OverDot[x,2] //ToBoxes
OverscriptBox["x", "¨"]
You can reproduce these boxes using Overscript:
Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "¨"]
You can use the same approach for triple dots:
Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "[TripleDot]"]
For more dots, you will have to use a different mechanism to generate the dots, e.g.:
Overscript[x, Style[Row[".",".",".","."],FontTracking->"Condensed"]]
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Use ToBoxes
to find the boxes generated for OverDot[x, 2]
:
OverDot[x,2] //ToBoxes
OverscriptBox["x", "¨"]
You can reproduce these boxes using Overscript:
Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "¨"]
You can use the same approach for triple dots:
Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "[TripleDot]"]
For more dots, you will have to use a different mechanism to generate the dots, e.g.:
Overscript[x, Style[Row[".",".",".","."],FontTracking->"Condensed"]]
$endgroup$
Use ToBoxes
to find the boxes generated for OverDot[x, 2]
:
OverDot[x,2] //ToBoxes
OverscriptBox["x", "¨"]
You can reproduce these boxes using Overscript:
Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "¨"]
You can use the same approach for triple dots:
Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "[TripleDot]"]
For more dots, you will have to use a different mechanism to generate the dots, e.g.:
Overscript[x, Style[Row[".",".",".","."],FontTracking->"Condensed"]]
answered 1 hour ago
Carl WollCarl Woll
73k396188
73k396188
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could fix the syntax highlighting, or ignore it. Here's a fix:
SyntaxInformation[OverDot] = "ArgumentsPattern" -> _, _.;
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could fix the syntax highlighting, or ignore it. Here's a fix:
SyntaxInformation[OverDot] = "ArgumentsPattern" -> _, _.;
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could fix the syntax highlighting, or ignore it. Here's a fix:
SyntaxInformation[OverDot] = "ArgumentsPattern" -> _, _.;
$endgroup$
You could fix the syntax highlighting, or ignore it. Here's a fix:
SyntaxInformation[OverDot] = "ArgumentsPattern" -> _, _.;
answered 1 hour ago
Michael E2Michael E2
150k12203482
150k12203482
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Go to the Basic math assistant palette and click on the template.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
There indeed is a [DoubleDot] template, but it actually leads to an expression with the FullFormOverDot[X,2]
! So the syntax is in fact intended, then I'm confused why Mathematica marks it in red font when typed in directly?
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes... confusing. The documentation forOverDot
shows only one argument... so the $2$ is somehow treated extraneously. (Perhaps a bug report is in order.)
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Go to the Basic math assistant palette and click on the template.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
There indeed is a [DoubleDot] template, but it actually leads to an expression with the FullFormOverDot[X,2]
! So the syntax is in fact intended, then I'm confused why Mathematica marks it in red font when typed in directly?
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes... confusing. The documentation forOverDot
shows only one argument... so the $2$ is somehow treated extraneously. (Perhaps a bug report is in order.)
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Go to the Basic math assistant palette and click on the template.
$endgroup$
Go to the Basic math assistant palette and click on the template.
edited 2 hours ago
answered 2 hours ago
David G. StorkDavid G. Stork
24.9k22155
24.9k22155
$begingroup$
There indeed is a [DoubleDot] template, but it actually leads to an expression with the FullFormOverDot[X,2]
! So the syntax is in fact intended, then I'm confused why Mathematica marks it in red font when typed in directly?
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes... confusing. The documentation forOverDot
shows only one argument... so the $2$ is somehow treated extraneously. (Perhaps a bug report is in order.)
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There indeed is a [DoubleDot] template, but it actually leads to an expression with the FullFormOverDot[X,2]
! So the syntax is in fact intended, then I'm confused why Mathematica marks it in red font when typed in directly?
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
2 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes... confusing. The documentation forOverDot
shows only one argument... so the $2$ is somehow treated extraneously. (Perhaps a bug report is in order.)
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
There indeed is a [DoubleDot] template, but it actually leads to an expression with the FullForm
OverDot[X,2]
! So the syntax is in fact intended, then I'm confused why Mathematica marks it in red font when typed in directly?$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
There indeed is a [DoubleDot] template, but it actually leads to an expression with the FullForm
OverDot[X,2]
! So the syntax is in fact intended, then I'm confused why Mathematica marks it in red font when typed in directly?$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Yes... confusing. The documentation for
OverDot
shows only one argument... so the $2$ is somehow treated extraneously. (Perhaps a bug report is in order.)$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes... confusing. The documentation for
OverDot
shows only one argument... so the $2$ is somehow treated extraneously. (Perhaps a bug report is in order.)$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194850%2ftypesetting-a-double-over-dot-on-top-of-a-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Overscript[x, ".."], Overscript[x, "..."], Overscript[x, "[Ellipsis]"]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
1 hour ago
2
$begingroup$
The code editor and documentation are not always completely in sync with the actual typesetting. This is only one of several examples. Ignore the code coloring.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
54 mins ago