Evaluate $lim_{xto infty}{(-3)^{2x+1}}$?How do I evaluate $lim_{h to infty} e^{h(1-s)}$?A Gamma limit...
Variable completely messes up echoed string
World War I as a war of liberals against authoritarians?
Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?
Existence of a celestial body big enough for early civilization to be thought of as a second moon
Probably overheated black color SMD pads
When to use snap-off blade knife and when to use trapezoid blade knife?
Knife as defense against stray dogs
Can you move over difficult terrain with only 5 feet of movement?
Synchronized implementation of a bank account in Java
Why didn't Héctor fade away after this character died in the movie Coco?
HP P840 HDD RAID 5 many strange drive failures
How can an organ that provides biological immortality be unable to regenerate?
What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?
Is there a hypothetical scenario that would make Earth uninhabitable for humans, but not for (the majority of) other animals?
Fewest number of steps to reach 200 using special calculator
Do I need to be arrogant to get ahead?
Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?
My friend is being a hypocrite
What favor did Moody owe Dumbledore?
How to get the n-th line after a grepped one?
Usage and meaning of "up" in "...worth at least a thousand pounds up in London"
What does "mu" mean as an interjection?
Using Past-Perfect interchangeably with the Past Continuous
What can I do if I am asked to learn different programming languages very frequently?
Evaluate $lim_{xto infty}{(-3)^{2x+1}}$?
How do I evaluate $lim_{h to infty} e^{h(1-s)}$?A Gamma limit $lim_{nrightarrow+infty}sum_{k=1}^n left( Gammabigl(frac{k}{n}bigr)right)^{-k}=frac{e^gamma}{e^gamma-1}$Evaluate the following limit of finite sumdividing expressions with limitsEuler Limit with -1 to infinity?Formal way to evaluate this limitEvaluate $lim_{x to -infty} ln(-x^3+x)$Limit of composite functionWhy does the following not show $zeta(0) = -frac{1}{2}$?limit of Integral of product of convergent functions
$begingroup$
Evaluate $lim_{xto infty}{(-3)^{2x+1}}?$
I have two solutions for this problem and both of them look valid to me, even though one of them is incorrect.
Firstly, I know that $(2x+1)$ is an odd number, so the limit will be positive infinity when $x$ takes an even number, and limit will be negative infinity when $x$ takes an odd number. Therefore, the limit does not exist.
On the other hand, if I perform some mathematical operations on the function:
$$lim_{xto infty}{(-3)^{2x+1}}=lim_{xto infty}{bigl((-3)^2bigr)^xcdot(-3)}=lim_{xto infty}{9^xcdot(-3)}=-9^infty=-infty$$
Where am I making a mistake on my second attempt?
calculus limits
$endgroup$
|
show 7 more comments
$begingroup$
Evaluate $lim_{xto infty}{(-3)^{2x+1}}?$
I have two solutions for this problem and both of them look valid to me, even though one of them is incorrect.
Firstly, I know that $(2x+1)$ is an odd number, so the limit will be positive infinity when $x$ takes an even number, and limit will be negative infinity when $x$ takes an odd number. Therefore, the limit does not exist.
On the other hand, if I perform some mathematical operations on the function:
$$lim_{xto infty}{(-3)^{2x+1}}=lim_{xto infty}{bigl((-3)^2bigr)^xcdot(-3)}=lim_{xto infty}{9^xcdot(-3)}=-9^infty=-infty$$
Where am I making a mistake on my second attempt?
calculus limits
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Does $x$ go over the integers or the real numbers here?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:21
$begingroup$
There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:22
1
$begingroup$
$x$ being even or odd doesn't matter- as long as $x$ is an integer, $2x+1$ will always be an odd integer (regardless of the parity of $x$ itself)
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Mar 11 at 19:28
1
$begingroup$
"There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers. " Limit doesn't exist for real numbers. If $2x+1$ is an even integer the value is positive and if $2x+1$ is odd integer it is negative. If $2x + 1 = frac nm$ where $m$ is even it is not defined. It is not defined if $2x + 1$ is irrational.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 11 at 19:40
1
$begingroup$
You cannot perform nonsense mathematical manipulations if you have no idea what you are doing. $-3^{2x}$ is most definitely NOT $9^x$ for many real values of x.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Liu
Mar 11 at 20:03
|
show 7 more comments
$begingroup$
Evaluate $lim_{xto infty}{(-3)^{2x+1}}?$
I have two solutions for this problem and both of them look valid to me, even though one of them is incorrect.
Firstly, I know that $(2x+1)$ is an odd number, so the limit will be positive infinity when $x$ takes an even number, and limit will be negative infinity when $x$ takes an odd number. Therefore, the limit does not exist.
On the other hand, if I perform some mathematical operations on the function:
$$lim_{xto infty}{(-3)^{2x+1}}=lim_{xto infty}{bigl((-3)^2bigr)^xcdot(-3)}=lim_{xto infty}{9^xcdot(-3)}=-9^infty=-infty$$
Where am I making a mistake on my second attempt?
calculus limits
$endgroup$
Evaluate $lim_{xto infty}{(-3)^{2x+1}}?$
I have two solutions for this problem and both of them look valid to me, even though one of them is incorrect.
Firstly, I know that $(2x+1)$ is an odd number, so the limit will be positive infinity when $x$ takes an even number, and limit will be negative infinity when $x$ takes an odd number. Therefore, the limit does not exist.
On the other hand, if I perform some mathematical operations on the function:
$$lim_{xto infty}{(-3)^{2x+1}}=lim_{xto infty}{bigl((-3)^2bigr)^xcdot(-3)}=lim_{xto infty}{9^xcdot(-3)}=-9^infty=-infty$$
Where am I making a mistake on my second attempt?
calculus limits
calculus limits
edited Mar 11 at 20:07
Eldar Rahimli
asked Mar 11 at 19:19
Eldar RahimliEldar Rahimli
36310
36310
2
$begingroup$
Does $x$ go over the integers or the real numbers here?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:21
$begingroup$
There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:22
1
$begingroup$
$x$ being even or odd doesn't matter- as long as $x$ is an integer, $2x+1$ will always be an odd integer (regardless of the parity of $x$ itself)
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Mar 11 at 19:28
1
$begingroup$
"There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers. " Limit doesn't exist for real numbers. If $2x+1$ is an even integer the value is positive and if $2x+1$ is odd integer it is negative. If $2x + 1 = frac nm$ where $m$ is even it is not defined. It is not defined if $2x + 1$ is irrational.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 11 at 19:40
1
$begingroup$
You cannot perform nonsense mathematical manipulations if you have no idea what you are doing. $-3^{2x}$ is most definitely NOT $9^x$ for many real values of x.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Liu
Mar 11 at 20:03
|
show 7 more comments
2
$begingroup$
Does $x$ go over the integers or the real numbers here?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:21
$begingroup$
There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:22
1
$begingroup$
$x$ being even or odd doesn't matter- as long as $x$ is an integer, $2x+1$ will always be an odd integer (regardless of the parity of $x$ itself)
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Mar 11 at 19:28
1
$begingroup$
"There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers. " Limit doesn't exist for real numbers. If $2x+1$ is an even integer the value is positive and if $2x+1$ is odd integer it is negative. If $2x + 1 = frac nm$ where $m$ is even it is not defined. It is not defined if $2x + 1$ is irrational.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 11 at 19:40
1
$begingroup$
You cannot perform nonsense mathematical manipulations if you have no idea what you are doing. $-3^{2x}$ is most definitely NOT $9^x$ for many real values of x.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Liu
Mar 11 at 20:03
2
2
$begingroup$
Does $x$ go over the integers or the real numbers here?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:21
$begingroup$
Does $x$ go over the integers or the real numbers here?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:21
$begingroup$
There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:22
$begingroup$
There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:22
1
1
$begingroup$
$x$ being even or odd doesn't matter- as long as $x$ is an integer, $2x+1$ will always be an odd integer (regardless of the parity of $x$ itself)
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Mar 11 at 19:28
$begingroup$
$x$ being even or odd doesn't matter- as long as $x$ is an integer, $2x+1$ will always be an odd integer (regardless of the parity of $x$ itself)
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Mar 11 at 19:28
1
1
$begingroup$
"There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers. " Limit doesn't exist for real numbers. If $2x+1$ is an even integer the value is positive and if $2x+1$ is odd integer it is negative. If $2x + 1 = frac nm$ where $m$ is even it is not defined. It is not defined if $2x + 1$ is irrational.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 11 at 19:40
$begingroup$
"There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers. " Limit doesn't exist for real numbers. If $2x+1$ is an even integer the value is positive and if $2x+1$ is odd integer it is negative. If $2x + 1 = frac nm$ where $m$ is even it is not defined. It is not defined if $2x + 1$ is irrational.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 11 at 19:40
1
1
$begingroup$
You cannot perform nonsense mathematical manipulations if you have no idea what you are doing. $-3^{2x}$ is most definitely NOT $9^x$ for many real values of x.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Liu
Mar 11 at 20:03
$begingroup$
You cannot perform nonsense mathematical manipulations if you have no idea what you are doing. $-3^{2x}$ is most definitely NOT $9^x$ for many real values of x.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Liu
Mar 11 at 20:03
|
show 7 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A negative number raised to an odd number is always negative, so "change between negative and positive" is wrong.
So assuming $x$ goes over the integers, the limit is $-infty$ as the exponent $2x+1$ is always odd. Yes, $(-3)^x$ alternates between positive and negative, but $(-3)^{2x+1}$ is strictly negative.
If $x$ goes over the reals, then before you can evaluate the limit you have to decide what something like $(-3)^pi$ means.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:32
$begingroup$
@EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:36
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144110%2fevaluate-lim-x-to-infty-32x1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A negative number raised to an odd number is always negative, so "change between negative and positive" is wrong.
So assuming $x$ goes over the integers, the limit is $-infty$ as the exponent $2x+1$ is always odd. Yes, $(-3)^x$ alternates between positive and negative, but $(-3)^{2x+1}$ is strictly negative.
If $x$ goes over the reals, then before you can evaluate the limit you have to decide what something like $(-3)^pi$ means.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:32
$begingroup$
@EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A negative number raised to an odd number is always negative, so "change between negative and positive" is wrong.
So assuming $x$ goes over the integers, the limit is $-infty$ as the exponent $2x+1$ is always odd. Yes, $(-3)^x$ alternates between positive and negative, but $(-3)^{2x+1}$ is strictly negative.
If $x$ goes over the reals, then before you can evaluate the limit you have to decide what something like $(-3)^pi$ means.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:32
$begingroup$
@EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A negative number raised to an odd number is always negative, so "change between negative and positive" is wrong.
So assuming $x$ goes over the integers, the limit is $-infty$ as the exponent $2x+1$ is always odd. Yes, $(-3)^x$ alternates between positive and negative, but $(-3)^{2x+1}$ is strictly negative.
If $x$ goes over the reals, then before you can evaluate the limit you have to decide what something like $(-3)^pi$ means.
$endgroup$
A negative number raised to an odd number is always negative, so "change between negative and positive" is wrong.
So assuming $x$ goes over the integers, the limit is $-infty$ as the exponent $2x+1$ is always odd. Yes, $(-3)^x$ alternates between positive and negative, but $(-3)^{2x+1}$ is strictly negative.
If $x$ goes over the reals, then before you can evaluate the limit you have to decide what something like $(-3)^pi$ means.
edited Mar 11 at 19:35
answered Mar 11 at 19:24
ArthurArthur
118k7118201
118k7118201
$begingroup$
I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:32
$begingroup$
@EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:32
$begingroup$
@EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:36
$begingroup$
I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:32
$begingroup$
I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:32
$begingroup$
@EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:36
$begingroup$
@EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:36
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144110%2fevaluate-lim-x-to-infty-32x1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Does $x$ go over the integers or the real numbers here?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:21
$begingroup$
There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:22
1
$begingroup$
$x$ being even or odd doesn't matter- as long as $x$ is an integer, $2x+1$ will always be an odd integer (regardless of the parity of $x$ itself)
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Mar 11 at 19:28
1
$begingroup$
"There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers. " Limit doesn't exist for real numbers. If $2x+1$ is an even integer the value is positive and if $2x+1$ is odd integer it is negative. If $2x + 1 = frac nm$ where $m$ is even it is not defined. It is not defined if $2x + 1$ is irrational.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 11 at 19:40
1
$begingroup$
You cannot perform nonsense mathematical manipulations if you have no idea what you are doing. $-3^{2x}$ is most definitely NOT $9^x$ for many real values of x.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Liu
Mar 11 at 20:03