Question on Turaev's paper about axioms for topological quantum field theoryWhat are D-branes (in a...

Print a physical multiplication table

I seem to dance, I am not a dancer. Who am I?

What does "^L" mean in C?

Does the attack bonus from a Masterwork weapon stack with the attack bonus from Masterwork ammunition?

Why is indicated airspeed rather than ground speed used during the takeoff roll?

Why didn't Héctor fade away after this character died in the movie Coco?

How to terminate ping <dest> &

PTIJ: Do Irish Jews have "the luck of the Irish"?

Bash - pair each line of file

두음법칙 - When did North and South diverge in pronunciation of initial ㄹ?

What are substitutions for coconut in curry?

World War I as a war of liberals against authoritarians?

Violin - Can double stops be played when the strings are not next to each other?

Geography in 3D perspective

Can a wizard cast a spell during their first turn of combat if they initiated combat by releasing a readied spell?

gerund and noun applications

How do hiring committees for research positions view getting "scooped"?

What favor did Moody owe Dumbledore?

Practical application of matrices and determinants

How can an organ that provides biological immortality be unable to regenerate?

Writing in a Christian voice

Help prove this basic trig identity please!

Deletion of copy-ctor & copy-assignment - public, private or protected?

Do I need to be arrogant to get ahead?



Question on Turaev's paper about axioms for topological quantum field theory


What are D-branes (in a topological field theory)?Atiyah's definitions of Topological Quantum Field TheoryPrerequisites for ‘Quantum field theory and representation theory: a sketch’ [arXiv:hep-th/0206135](Topological quantum field theory) identifying objects of cobordism categoryTopological Quantum Field theoriesLearning roadmap to Topological Quantum Field Theories from a mathematics perspectiveGeometric algebra and quantum field theoryExtended Topological Quantum Field Theory (ETQFT) by Jacob LurieTopological Quantum Field TheoryLiterature recommendation: Algebraic Quantum Field Theory













1












$begingroup$


I am currently reading Turaev's paper Axioms for topological quantum field theory.



In couple of place, there is a paraphrase "... is natural with respect to $mathfrak{U}$-homeomorphism" and I don't really understand what does it mean. One is in the definition of self-dual modular functor.



It says system of bilinear pairing is natural with respect to $mathfrak{U}$-homeomorphism and the other is in the definition of cobordism. It says gluing is natural with respect to $mathfrak{U}$-homeomorphism. It seem like that paraphrase is something I should get used to before jumping into Turaev's papers.



If so, a book suggestion would be very helpful. If not, can someone explain what Turaev means by the paraphrase.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    There's a category of such homeomorphisms. Do you know what a natural transformation is?
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin Carlson
    Jul 11 '18 at 16:54










  • $begingroup$
    I know what natural transformation but i don't really know how to see any entitiy as a functor in that context.
    $endgroup$
    – erolbarut
    Jul 11 '18 at 18:40
















1












$begingroup$


I am currently reading Turaev's paper Axioms for topological quantum field theory.



In couple of place, there is a paraphrase "... is natural with respect to $mathfrak{U}$-homeomorphism" and I don't really understand what does it mean. One is in the definition of self-dual modular functor.



It says system of bilinear pairing is natural with respect to $mathfrak{U}$-homeomorphism and the other is in the definition of cobordism. It says gluing is natural with respect to $mathfrak{U}$-homeomorphism. It seem like that paraphrase is something I should get used to before jumping into Turaev's papers.



If so, a book suggestion would be very helpful. If not, can someone explain what Turaev means by the paraphrase.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    There's a category of such homeomorphisms. Do you know what a natural transformation is?
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin Carlson
    Jul 11 '18 at 16:54










  • $begingroup$
    I know what natural transformation but i don't really know how to see any entitiy as a functor in that context.
    $endgroup$
    – erolbarut
    Jul 11 '18 at 18:40














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


I am currently reading Turaev's paper Axioms for topological quantum field theory.



In couple of place, there is a paraphrase "... is natural with respect to $mathfrak{U}$-homeomorphism" and I don't really understand what does it mean. One is in the definition of self-dual modular functor.



It says system of bilinear pairing is natural with respect to $mathfrak{U}$-homeomorphism and the other is in the definition of cobordism. It says gluing is natural with respect to $mathfrak{U}$-homeomorphism. It seem like that paraphrase is something I should get used to before jumping into Turaev's papers.



If so, a book suggestion would be very helpful. If not, can someone explain what Turaev means by the paraphrase.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am currently reading Turaev's paper Axioms for topological quantum field theory.



In couple of place, there is a paraphrase "... is natural with respect to $mathfrak{U}$-homeomorphism" and I don't really understand what does it mean. One is in the definition of self-dual modular functor.



It says system of bilinear pairing is natural with respect to $mathfrak{U}$-homeomorphism and the other is in the definition of cobordism. It says gluing is natural with respect to $mathfrak{U}$-homeomorphism. It seem like that paraphrase is something I should get used to before jumping into Turaev's papers.



If so, a book suggestion would be very helpful. If not, can someone explain what Turaev means by the paraphrase.







reference-request category-theory mathematical-physics quantum-field-theory topological-quantum-field-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 11 at 20:01









dantopa

6,64942245




6,64942245










asked Jul 11 '18 at 14:00









erolbaruterolbarut

406




406












  • $begingroup$
    There's a category of such homeomorphisms. Do you know what a natural transformation is?
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin Carlson
    Jul 11 '18 at 16:54










  • $begingroup$
    I know what natural transformation but i don't really know how to see any entitiy as a functor in that context.
    $endgroup$
    – erolbarut
    Jul 11 '18 at 18:40


















  • $begingroup$
    There's a category of such homeomorphisms. Do you know what a natural transformation is?
    $endgroup$
    – Kevin Carlson
    Jul 11 '18 at 16:54










  • $begingroup$
    I know what natural transformation but i don't really know how to see any entitiy as a functor in that context.
    $endgroup$
    – erolbarut
    Jul 11 '18 at 18:40
















$begingroup$
There's a category of such homeomorphisms. Do you know what a natural transformation is?
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Jul 11 '18 at 16:54




$begingroup$
There's a category of such homeomorphisms. Do you know what a natural transformation is?
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Jul 11 '18 at 16:54












$begingroup$
I know what natural transformation but i don't really know how to see any entitiy as a functor in that context.
$endgroup$
– erolbarut
Jul 11 '18 at 18:40




$begingroup$
I know what natural transformation but i don't really know how to see any entitiy as a functor in that context.
$endgroup$
– erolbarut
Jul 11 '18 at 18:40










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2847675%2fquestion-on-turaevs-paper-about-axioms-for-topological-quantum-field-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2847675%2fquestion-on-turaevs-paper-about-axioms-for-topological-quantum-field-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Nidaros erkebispedøme

Birsay

Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...