When can two endomorphisms on different vector spaces be identified The Next CEO of Stack...
What connection does MS Office have to Netscape Navigator?
Why do remote companies require working in the US?
Rotate a column
Does it take more energy to get to Venus or to Mars?
Make solar eclipses exceedingly rare, but still have new moons
Sending manuscript to multiple publishers
Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?
Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"
How does the mv command work with external drives?
Is 'diverse range' a pleonastic phrase?
Why don't programming languages automatically manage the synchronous/asynchronous problem?
Would a galaxy be visible from outside, but nearby?
Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?
Novel about a guy who is possessed by the divine essence and the world ends?
How to safely derail a train during transit?
Inappropriate reference requests from Journal reviewers
What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?
Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis
How do I make a variable always equal to the result of some calculations?
What does convergence in distribution "in the Gromov–Hausdorff" sense mean?
Interfacing a button to MCU (and PC) with 50m long cable
Are there any limitations on attacking while grappling?
Can I equip Skullclamp on a creature I am sacrificing?
If the heap is initialized for security, then why is the stack uninitialized?
When can two endomorphisms on different vector spaces be identified
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowSystems of linear equations: What did the author mean?Can vector spaces over different fields be isomorphic?How can I determine the number of wedge products of $1$-forms needed to express a $k$-form as a sum of such?Mapping vector spaces over two different fields?Can two 'different' vector spaces have the same vector?Cyclic Vector Spaces and EndomorphismsA bijection between two different basis for different vector spacesDiagonalizable vector-space-endomorphisms.Theorem 2.20 in Friedberg's Linear AlgebraCharacterize all the pairs $(A,B)$ which satisfy $bigwedge^k A=bigwedge^k B neq 0$
$begingroup$
Suppose $dim V = dim W$. Given $phi:Vrightarrow V$ and $psi:Wrightarrow W$ when do we have bijective linear maps $a,b:Vrightarrow W$ such that
$$require{AMScd}
begin{CD}
V @>phi>> V \
@VaVV @VVbV \
W @>psi>>W
end{CD}
$$
commutes?
My intuition says that if the rank of $phi$ and $psi$ match there should exist $a,b$. Of course with $a=b$, this requires that $phi,psi$ are similar (after identifying $V$ and $W$ in any way you like), but with $aneq b$ allowed, it seems this is much weaker.
linear-algebra linear-transformations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $dim V = dim W$. Given $phi:Vrightarrow V$ and $psi:Wrightarrow W$ when do we have bijective linear maps $a,b:Vrightarrow W$ such that
$$require{AMScd}
begin{CD}
V @>phi>> V \
@VaVV @VVbV \
W @>psi>>W
end{CD}
$$
commutes?
My intuition says that if the rank of $phi$ and $psi$ match there should exist $a,b$. Of course with $a=b$, this requires that $phi,psi$ are similar (after identifying $V$ and $W$ in any way you like), but with $aneq b$ allowed, it seems this is much weaker.
linear-algebra linear-transformations
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$a=b=0$ is always an option for every choice of $phi$ and $psi$.
$endgroup$
– user647486
Mar 16 at 18:20
$begingroup$
Sorry, isomorphisms $a,b$
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 16 at 18:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $dim V = dim W$. Given $phi:Vrightarrow V$ and $psi:Wrightarrow W$ when do we have bijective linear maps $a,b:Vrightarrow W$ such that
$$require{AMScd}
begin{CD}
V @>phi>> V \
@VaVV @VVbV \
W @>psi>>W
end{CD}
$$
commutes?
My intuition says that if the rank of $phi$ and $psi$ match there should exist $a,b$. Of course with $a=b$, this requires that $phi,psi$ are similar (after identifying $V$ and $W$ in any way you like), but with $aneq b$ allowed, it seems this is much weaker.
linear-algebra linear-transformations
$endgroup$
Suppose $dim V = dim W$. Given $phi:Vrightarrow V$ and $psi:Wrightarrow W$ when do we have bijective linear maps $a,b:Vrightarrow W$ such that
$$require{AMScd}
begin{CD}
V @>phi>> V \
@VaVV @VVbV \
W @>psi>>W
end{CD}
$$
commutes?
My intuition says that if the rank of $phi$ and $psi$ match there should exist $a,b$. Of course with $a=b$, this requires that $phi,psi$ are similar (after identifying $V$ and $W$ in any way you like), but with $aneq b$ allowed, it seems this is much weaker.
linear-algebra linear-transformations
linear-algebra linear-transformations
edited Mar 16 at 19:01
egreg
185k1486206
185k1486206
asked Mar 16 at 18:13
Joshua TilleyJoshua Tilley
563313
563313
$begingroup$
$a=b=0$ is always an option for every choice of $phi$ and $psi$.
$endgroup$
– user647486
Mar 16 at 18:20
$begingroup$
Sorry, isomorphisms $a,b$
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 16 at 18:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$a=b=0$ is always an option for every choice of $phi$ and $psi$.
$endgroup$
– user647486
Mar 16 at 18:20
$begingroup$
Sorry, isomorphisms $a,b$
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 16 at 18:26
$begingroup$
$a=b=0$ is always an option for every choice of $phi$ and $psi$.
$endgroup$
– user647486
Mar 16 at 18:20
$begingroup$
$a=b=0$ is always an option for every choice of $phi$ and $psi$.
$endgroup$
– user647486
Mar 16 at 18:20
$begingroup$
Sorry, isomorphisms $a,b$
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 16 at 18:26
$begingroup$
Sorry, isomorphisms $a,b$
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 16 at 18:26
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is essentially the change of bases.
Suppose that $phi$ and $psi$ have the same rank $k$. Take a basis ${v_1,dots,v_n}$ of $V$ such that ${phi(v_1),dots,phi(v_k)}$ is a basis of the range of $phi$.
Choose similarly a basis ${w_1,dots,w_n}$ for $W$.
Now complete ${phi(v_1),dots,phi(v_k)}$ to a basis ${phi(v_1),dots,phi(v_k),v_{k+1}',dots,v_n'}$ of $V$. Similarly, complete ${psi(w_1),dots,psi(w_k)}$ to a basis ${psi(w_1),dots,psi(w_k),w_{k+1}',dots,w_n'}$ of $W$.
Define $a$ by $a(v_i)=w_i$; define $b$ by $b(phi(v_i))=psi(w_i)$ for $i=1,2,dots,k$ and $b(v_i')=w_i'$ for $i=k+1,dots,n$.
Then $a$ and $b$ induce bijective linear maps and, for $i=1,2,dots,n$,
$$
b(phi(v_i))=psi(w_i)=psi(a(v_i))
$$
Can you show the converse?
Without bases, you can use complements. Write $V=V_1opluskerphi$, so $phi$ induces an injective linear map $V_1to V$, with the same image as $phi$. Write $V=operatorname{im}phioplus V_2$.
Do similarly for $psi$, writing $W=W_1opluskerpsi=operatorname{im}psioplus W_2$.
By assumption $dim V_1=dim W_1$ and $dim V_2=dim W_2$. Choose suitably the isomorphisms, noting that $phi$ and $psi$ induce isomorphisms $V_1tooperatorname{im}phi$ and $W_1tooperatorname{im}psi$. However this is not really different from choosing bases.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The converse is nice and easy: $win textrm {im} left( psi right)$ iff $ w in b left(textrm {im} left(phiright) $ by the diagram, so since the images are related by an isomorphism, they have the same dimension.
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:42
$begingroup$
The particular bases seem to do no work in the argument, could you provide a proof just in terms of the relevant subspaces: the kernels and images?
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:43
$begingroup$
@JoshuaTilley What's the problem with the bases?
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 19 at 12:50
$begingroup$
Nothing, but many bases will work, it is the subspaces that are important. I'm thinking there is a cleaner argument without invoking a basis. Nonetheless, the current argument is of course fine.
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:52
$begingroup$
@JoshuaTilley I added a pattern for the proof.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 19 at 14:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Then that condition is just equivalence of $phi$ and $psi$, which is equivalent to having the same rank.
To show this, take a basis $e_i^V$, $iin I_1$ of the kernel of $phi$ and extend it to a basis $e_i^V$, $iin I_1cup I_2$ of $V$. Then, the elements of the basis that are not in the kernel are mapped to a basis $f_i^V$, $iin J_1$ of the range of $phi$. Let's assume that we index them such that $phi(e_i^V)=f_i^V$ for $iin I_1$. Extend also this basis to a basis $f_i^V$, $iin J_1cup J_2$ of $V$ (but the $V$ that is the codomain of $phi$).
Do the same business with $W$ and $psi$ to obtain bases $e_i^W$, $iin I_1cup I_2$ and $f_i^W$, $iin J_1cup J_2$. Assume that we also repeated the construction such that $psi(e_i^W)=f_i^W$, for $iin I_1$. Note that I used the same index sets, since the ranks are assumed equal. Therefore, the sets of indexes required have the same cardinality. So, we can just take them equal.
Finally define $a(e_i^V)=e_i^W$ and $b(f_i^V)=f_i^W$ and extend them by linearity.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150645%2fwhen-can-two-endomorphisms-on-different-vector-spaces-be-identified%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is essentially the change of bases.
Suppose that $phi$ and $psi$ have the same rank $k$. Take a basis ${v_1,dots,v_n}$ of $V$ such that ${phi(v_1),dots,phi(v_k)}$ is a basis of the range of $phi$.
Choose similarly a basis ${w_1,dots,w_n}$ for $W$.
Now complete ${phi(v_1),dots,phi(v_k)}$ to a basis ${phi(v_1),dots,phi(v_k),v_{k+1}',dots,v_n'}$ of $V$. Similarly, complete ${psi(w_1),dots,psi(w_k)}$ to a basis ${psi(w_1),dots,psi(w_k),w_{k+1}',dots,w_n'}$ of $W$.
Define $a$ by $a(v_i)=w_i$; define $b$ by $b(phi(v_i))=psi(w_i)$ for $i=1,2,dots,k$ and $b(v_i')=w_i'$ for $i=k+1,dots,n$.
Then $a$ and $b$ induce bijective linear maps and, for $i=1,2,dots,n$,
$$
b(phi(v_i))=psi(w_i)=psi(a(v_i))
$$
Can you show the converse?
Without bases, you can use complements. Write $V=V_1opluskerphi$, so $phi$ induces an injective linear map $V_1to V$, with the same image as $phi$. Write $V=operatorname{im}phioplus V_2$.
Do similarly for $psi$, writing $W=W_1opluskerpsi=operatorname{im}psioplus W_2$.
By assumption $dim V_1=dim W_1$ and $dim V_2=dim W_2$. Choose suitably the isomorphisms, noting that $phi$ and $psi$ induce isomorphisms $V_1tooperatorname{im}phi$ and $W_1tooperatorname{im}psi$. However this is not really different from choosing bases.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The converse is nice and easy: $win textrm {im} left( psi right)$ iff $ w in b left(textrm {im} left(phiright) $ by the diagram, so since the images are related by an isomorphism, they have the same dimension.
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:42
$begingroup$
The particular bases seem to do no work in the argument, could you provide a proof just in terms of the relevant subspaces: the kernels and images?
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:43
$begingroup$
@JoshuaTilley What's the problem with the bases?
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 19 at 12:50
$begingroup$
Nothing, but many bases will work, it is the subspaces that are important. I'm thinking there is a cleaner argument without invoking a basis. Nonetheless, the current argument is of course fine.
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:52
$begingroup$
@JoshuaTilley I added a pattern for the proof.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 19 at 14:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is essentially the change of bases.
Suppose that $phi$ and $psi$ have the same rank $k$. Take a basis ${v_1,dots,v_n}$ of $V$ such that ${phi(v_1),dots,phi(v_k)}$ is a basis of the range of $phi$.
Choose similarly a basis ${w_1,dots,w_n}$ for $W$.
Now complete ${phi(v_1),dots,phi(v_k)}$ to a basis ${phi(v_1),dots,phi(v_k),v_{k+1}',dots,v_n'}$ of $V$. Similarly, complete ${psi(w_1),dots,psi(w_k)}$ to a basis ${psi(w_1),dots,psi(w_k),w_{k+1}',dots,w_n'}$ of $W$.
Define $a$ by $a(v_i)=w_i$; define $b$ by $b(phi(v_i))=psi(w_i)$ for $i=1,2,dots,k$ and $b(v_i')=w_i'$ for $i=k+1,dots,n$.
Then $a$ and $b$ induce bijective linear maps and, for $i=1,2,dots,n$,
$$
b(phi(v_i))=psi(w_i)=psi(a(v_i))
$$
Can you show the converse?
Without bases, you can use complements. Write $V=V_1opluskerphi$, so $phi$ induces an injective linear map $V_1to V$, with the same image as $phi$. Write $V=operatorname{im}phioplus V_2$.
Do similarly for $psi$, writing $W=W_1opluskerpsi=operatorname{im}psioplus W_2$.
By assumption $dim V_1=dim W_1$ and $dim V_2=dim W_2$. Choose suitably the isomorphisms, noting that $phi$ and $psi$ induce isomorphisms $V_1tooperatorname{im}phi$ and $W_1tooperatorname{im}psi$. However this is not really different from choosing bases.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The converse is nice and easy: $win textrm {im} left( psi right)$ iff $ w in b left(textrm {im} left(phiright) $ by the diagram, so since the images are related by an isomorphism, they have the same dimension.
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:42
$begingroup$
The particular bases seem to do no work in the argument, could you provide a proof just in terms of the relevant subspaces: the kernels and images?
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:43
$begingroup$
@JoshuaTilley What's the problem with the bases?
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 19 at 12:50
$begingroup$
Nothing, but many bases will work, it is the subspaces that are important. I'm thinking there is a cleaner argument without invoking a basis. Nonetheless, the current argument is of course fine.
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:52
$begingroup$
@JoshuaTilley I added a pattern for the proof.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 19 at 14:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is essentially the change of bases.
Suppose that $phi$ and $psi$ have the same rank $k$. Take a basis ${v_1,dots,v_n}$ of $V$ such that ${phi(v_1),dots,phi(v_k)}$ is a basis of the range of $phi$.
Choose similarly a basis ${w_1,dots,w_n}$ for $W$.
Now complete ${phi(v_1),dots,phi(v_k)}$ to a basis ${phi(v_1),dots,phi(v_k),v_{k+1}',dots,v_n'}$ of $V$. Similarly, complete ${psi(w_1),dots,psi(w_k)}$ to a basis ${psi(w_1),dots,psi(w_k),w_{k+1}',dots,w_n'}$ of $W$.
Define $a$ by $a(v_i)=w_i$; define $b$ by $b(phi(v_i))=psi(w_i)$ for $i=1,2,dots,k$ and $b(v_i')=w_i'$ for $i=k+1,dots,n$.
Then $a$ and $b$ induce bijective linear maps and, for $i=1,2,dots,n$,
$$
b(phi(v_i))=psi(w_i)=psi(a(v_i))
$$
Can you show the converse?
Without bases, you can use complements. Write $V=V_1opluskerphi$, so $phi$ induces an injective linear map $V_1to V$, with the same image as $phi$. Write $V=operatorname{im}phioplus V_2$.
Do similarly for $psi$, writing $W=W_1opluskerpsi=operatorname{im}psioplus W_2$.
By assumption $dim V_1=dim W_1$ and $dim V_2=dim W_2$. Choose suitably the isomorphisms, noting that $phi$ and $psi$ induce isomorphisms $V_1tooperatorname{im}phi$ and $W_1tooperatorname{im}psi$. However this is not really different from choosing bases.
$endgroup$
This is essentially the change of bases.
Suppose that $phi$ and $psi$ have the same rank $k$. Take a basis ${v_1,dots,v_n}$ of $V$ such that ${phi(v_1),dots,phi(v_k)}$ is a basis of the range of $phi$.
Choose similarly a basis ${w_1,dots,w_n}$ for $W$.
Now complete ${phi(v_1),dots,phi(v_k)}$ to a basis ${phi(v_1),dots,phi(v_k),v_{k+1}',dots,v_n'}$ of $V$. Similarly, complete ${psi(w_1),dots,psi(w_k)}$ to a basis ${psi(w_1),dots,psi(w_k),w_{k+1}',dots,w_n'}$ of $W$.
Define $a$ by $a(v_i)=w_i$; define $b$ by $b(phi(v_i))=psi(w_i)$ for $i=1,2,dots,k$ and $b(v_i')=w_i'$ for $i=k+1,dots,n$.
Then $a$ and $b$ induce bijective linear maps and, for $i=1,2,dots,n$,
$$
b(phi(v_i))=psi(w_i)=psi(a(v_i))
$$
Can you show the converse?
Without bases, you can use complements. Write $V=V_1opluskerphi$, so $phi$ induces an injective linear map $V_1to V$, with the same image as $phi$. Write $V=operatorname{im}phioplus V_2$.
Do similarly for $psi$, writing $W=W_1opluskerpsi=operatorname{im}psioplus W_2$.
By assumption $dim V_1=dim W_1$ and $dim V_2=dim W_2$. Choose suitably the isomorphisms, noting that $phi$ and $psi$ induce isomorphisms $V_1tooperatorname{im}phi$ and $W_1tooperatorname{im}psi$. However this is not really different from choosing bases.
edited Mar 19 at 14:00
answered Mar 16 at 19:11
egregegreg
185k1486206
185k1486206
$begingroup$
The converse is nice and easy: $win textrm {im} left( psi right)$ iff $ w in b left(textrm {im} left(phiright) $ by the diagram, so since the images are related by an isomorphism, they have the same dimension.
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:42
$begingroup$
The particular bases seem to do no work in the argument, could you provide a proof just in terms of the relevant subspaces: the kernels and images?
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:43
$begingroup$
@JoshuaTilley What's the problem with the bases?
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 19 at 12:50
$begingroup$
Nothing, but many bases will work, it is the subspaces that are important. I'm thinking there is a cleaner argument without invoking a basis. Nonetheless, the current argument is of course fine.
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:52
$begingroup$
@JoshuaTilley I added a pattern for the proof.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 19 at 14:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The converse is nice and easy: $win textrm {im} left( psi right)$ iff $ w in b left(textrm {im} left(phiright) $ by the diagram, so since the images are related by an isomorphism, they have the same dimension.
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:42
$begingroup$
The particular bases seem to do no work in the argument, could you provide a proof just in terms of the relevant subspaces: the kernels and images?
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:43
$begingroup$
@JoshuaTilley What's the problem with the bases?
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 19 at 12:50
$begingroup$
Nothing, but many bases will work, it is the subspaces that are important. I'm thinking there is a cleaner argument without invoking a basis. Nonetheless, the current argument is of course fine.
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:52
$begingroup$
@JoshuaTilley I added a pattern for the proof.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 19 at 14:00
$begingroup$
The converse is nice and easy: $win textrm {im} left( psi right)$ iff $ w in b left(textrm {im} left(phiright) $ by the diagram, so since the images are related by an isomorphism, they have the same dimension.
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:42
$begingroup$
The converse is nice and easy: $win textrm {im} left( psi right)$ iff $ w in b left(textrm {im} left(phiright) $ by the diagram, so since the images are related by an isomorphism, they have the same dimension.
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:42
$begingroup$
The particular bases seem to do no work in the argument, could you provide a proof just in terms of the relevant subspaces: the kernels and images?
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:43
$begingroup$
The particular bases seem to do no work in the argument, could you provide a proof just in terms of the relevant subspaces: the kernels and images?
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:43
$begingroup$
@JoshuaTilley What's the problem with the bases?
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 19 at 12:50
$begingroup$
@JoshuaTilley What's the problem with the bases?
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 19 at 12:50
$begingroup$
Nothing, but many bases will work, it is the subspaces that are important. I'm thinking there is a cleaner argument without invoking a basis. Nonetheless, the current argument is of course fine.
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:52
$begingroup$
Nothing, but many bases will work, it is the subspaces that are important. I'm thinking there is a cleaner argument without invoking a basis. Nonetheless, the current argument is of course fine.
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 19 at 12:52
$begingroup$
@JoshuaTilley I added a pattern for the proof.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 19 at 14:00
$begingroup$
@JoshuaTilley I added a pattern for the proof.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Mar 19 at 14:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Then that condition is just equivalence of $phi$ and $psi$, which is equivalent to having the same rank.
To show this, take a basis $e_i^V$, $iin I_1$ of the kernel of $phi$ and extend it to a basis $e_i^V$, $iin I_1cup I_2$ of $V$. Then, the elements of the basis that are not in the kernel are mapped to a basis $f_i^V$, $iin J_1$ of the range of $phi$. Let's assume that we index them such that $phi(e_i^V)=f_i^V$ for $iin I_1$. Extend also this basis to a basis $f_i^V$, $iin J_1cup J_2$ of $V$ (but the $V$ that is the codomain of $phi$).
Do the same business with $W$ and $psi$ to obtain bases $e_i^W$, $iin I_1cup I_2$ and $f_i^W$, $iin J_1cup J_2$. Assume that we also repeated the construction such that $psi(e_i^W)=f_i^W$, for $iin I_1$. Note that I used the same index sets, since the ranks are assumed equal. Therefore, the sets of indexes required have the same cardinality. So, we can just take them equal.
Finally define $a(e_i^V)=e_i^W$ and $b(f_i^V)=f_i^W$ and extend them by linearity.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Then that condition is just equivalence of $phi$ and $psi$, which is equivalent to having the same rank.
To show this, take a basis $e_i^V$, $iin I_1$ of the kernel of $phi$ and extend it to a basis $e_i^V$, $iin I_1cup I_2$ of $V$. Then, the elements of the basis that are not in the kernel are mapped to a basis $f_i^V$, $iin J_1$ of the range of $phi$. Let's assume that we index them such that $phi(e_i^V)=f_i^V$ for $iin I_1$. Extend also this basis to a basis $f_i^V$, $iin J_1cup J_2$ of $V$ (but the $V$ that is the codomain of $phi$).
Do the same business with $W$ and $psi$ to obtain bases $e_i^W$, $iin I_1cup I_2$ and $f_i^W$, $iin J_1cup J_2$. Assume that we also repeated the construction such that $psi(e_i^W)=f_i^W$, for $iin I_1$. Note that I used the same index sets, since the ranks are assumed equal. Therefore, the sets of indexes required have the same cardinality. So, we can just take them equal.
Finally define $a(e_i^V)=e_i^W$ and $b(f_i^V)=f_i^W$ and extend them by linearity.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Then that condition is just equivalence of $phi$ and $psi$, which is equivalent to having the same rank.
To show this, take a basis $e_i^V$, $iin I_1$ of the kernel of $phi$ and extend it to a basis $e_i^V$, $iin I_1cup I_2$ of $V$. Then, the elements of the basis that are not in the kernel are mapped to a basis $f_i^V$, $iin J_1$ of the range of $phi$. Let's assume that we index them such that $phi(e_i^V)=f_i^V$ for $iin I_1$. Extend also this basis to a basis $f_i^V$, $iin J_1cup J_2$ of $V$ (but the $V$ that is the codomain of $phi$).
Do the same business with $W$ and $psi$ to obtain bases $e_i^W$, $iin I_1cup I_2$ and $f_i^W$, $iin J_1cup J_2$. Assume that we also repeated the construction such that $psi(e_i^W)=f_i^W$, for $iin I_1$. Note that I used the same index sets, since the ranks are assumed equal. Therefore, the sets of indexes required have the same cardinality. So, we can just take them equal.
Finally define $a(e_i^V)=e_i^W$ and $b(f_i^V)=f_i^W$ and extend them by linearity.
$endgroup$
Then that condition is just equivalence of $phi$ and $psi$, which is equivalent to having the same rank.
To show this, take a basis $e_i^V$, $iin I_1$ of the kernel of $phi$ and extend it to a basis $e_i^V$, $iin I_1cup I_2$ of $V$. Then, the elements of the basis that are not in the kernel are mapped to a basis $f_i^V$, $iin J_1$ of the range of $phi$. Let's assume that we index them such that $phi(e_i^V)=f_i^V$ for $iin I_1$. Extend also this basis to a basis $f_i^V$, $iin J_1cup J_2$ of $V$ (but the $V$ that is the codomain of $phi$).
Do the same business with $W$ and $psi$ to obtain bases $e_i^W$, $iin I_1cup I_2$ and $f_i^W$, $iin J_1cup J_2$. Assume that we also repeated the construction such that $psi(e_i^W)=f_i^W$, for $iin I_1$. Note that I used the same index sets, since the ranks are assumed equal. Therefore, the sets of indexes required have the same cardinality. So, we can just take them equal.
Finally define $a(e_i^V)=e_i^W$ and $b(f_i^V)=f_i^W$ and extend them by linearity.
answered Mar 16 at 19:12
user647486user647486
582110
582110
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150645%2fwhen-can-two-endomorphisms-on-different-vector-spaces-be-identified%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
$a=b=0$ is always an option for every choice of $phi$ and $psi$.
$endgroup$
– user647486
Mar 16 at 18:20
$begingroup$
Sorry, isomorphisms $a,b$
$endgroup$
– Joshua Tilley
Mar 16 at 18:26