Double sums and convergence to $infty$. [on hold]Question about sums and double sumsUniform convergence of...

An Undercover Army

What is Tony Stark injecting into himself in Iron Man 3?

Paper published similar to PhD thesis

Why would /etc/passwd be used every time someone executes `ls -l` command?

Is this Paypal Github SDK reference really a dangerous site?

Should we avoid writing fiction about historical events without extensive research?

Averaging over columns while ignoring zero entries

ESPP--any reason not to go all in?

How to educate team mate to take screenshots for bugs with out unwanted stuff

Issue with units for a rocket nozzle throat area problem

What does *dead* mean in *What do you mean, dead?*?

Unidentified signals on FT8 frequencies

Giving a talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

What do you call someone who likes to pick fights?

I am the person who abides by rules but breaks the rules . Who am I

Too soon for a plot twist?

Why do we call complex numbers “numbers” but we don’t consider 2-vectors numbers?

Insult for someone who "doesn't know anything"

Ultrafilters as a double dual

What is the oldest European royal house?

Vector-transposing function

If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?

Should I file my taxes? No income, unemployed, but paid 2k in student loan interest

How to distinguish easily different soldier of ww2?



Double sums and convergence to $infty$. [on hold]


Question about sums and double sumsUniform convergence of the series on unbounded domaininterchanging sum and lim with uniformly convergence seriesShow that the sequence of functions ${f_n}(x)=frac{x}{1+nx^2}$ converges uniformlyConvergence of series implies convergence of related seriesDisproving uniform convergence of $sum_{n=1}^infty frac2{pi} frac1n Big (1-cosBig(nfrac{pi}2Big) Big)sin(nx)$Find a sequence $f_n$ so that $int_0 ^1 |f_n(x)| = 2$ and $lim_{n to infty} f_n(x) = 1$.$n$-th partial sum and convergence $sum_{k=1}^{infty}frac{1}{k(k+2)}$Sequence $(f_n) to f_n$ on $S subseteq mathbb{R}$ converges uniformly iff $lim_{n to infty} sup {f(x)-f_n(x)| : xin S} = 0$Show $ langle f(t), f'(t) rangle = 0$ for all $t in mathbb{R}$.













0












$begingroup$


I am having trouble proving/disproving the following:




Let ${f_n}_{n=1}^infty$ be a sequence with $f_n:mathbb{N} rightarrow mathbb{R}^+$.
Suppose $$sum_{n = 1}^infty left (sum_{k=1}^infty f_n(k)right) = infty.$$ Prove or disprove that $$sum_{k = 1}^infty left (sum_{n=1}^infty f_n(k)right) = infty.$$




I suspect it is true, and have tried using the definition of a series diverging to $+ infty$, but I don't know how to handle the inner sum. Any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, RRL, Xander Henderson, Saad, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會 18 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, RRL, Xander Henderson, Saad, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Try proving the contrapositive (that is, if one is finite, then they’re both finite [and have the same value]). Hint: all of the terms are positive.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    Jan 21 at 0:44










  • $begingroup$
    With the contrapositive, I don't have to worry about divergence (or oscillations) since all the terms are positive , right?
    $endgroup$
    – user439126
    Jan 21 at 0:49










  • $begingroup$
    Correct. ${}{}$
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    Jan 21 at 0:55










  • $begingroup$
    Great, thanks a bunch.
    $endgroup$
    – user439126
    Jan 21 at 0:59
















0












$begingroup$


I am having trouble proving/disproving the following:




Let ${f_n}_{n=1}^infty$ be a sequence with $f_n:mathbb{N} rightarrow mathbb{R}^+$.
Suppose $$sum_{n = 1}^infty left (sum_{k=1}^infty f_n(k)right) = infty.$$ Prove or disprove that $$sum_{k = 1}^infty left (sum_{n=1}^infty f_n(k)right) = infty.$$




I suspect it is true, and have tried using the definition of a series diverging to $+ infty$, but I don't know how to handle the inner sum. Any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, RRL, Xander Henderson, Saad, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會 18 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, RRL, Xander Henderson, Saad, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Try proving the contrapositive (that is, if one is finite, then they’re both finite [and have the same value]). Hint: all of the terms are positive.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    Jan 21 at 0:44










  • $begingroup$
    With the contrapositive, I don't have to worry about divergence (or oscillations) since all the terms are positive , right?
    $endgroup$
    – user439126
    Jan 21 at 0:49










  • $begingroup$
    Correct. ${}{}$
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    Jan 21 at 0:55










  • $begingroup$
    Great, thanks a bunch.
    $endgroup$
    – user439126
    Jan 21 at 0:59














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I am having trouble proving/disproving the following:




Let ${f_n}_{n=1}^infty$ be a sequence with $f_n:mathbb{N} rightarrow mathbb{R}^+$.
Suppose $$sum_{n = 1}^infty left (sum_{k=1}^infty f_n(k)right) = infty.$$ Prove or disprove that $$sum_{k = 1}^infty left (sum_{n=1}^infty f_n(k)right) = infty.$$




I suspect it is true, and have tried using the definition of a series diverging to $+ infty$, but I don't know how to handle the inner sum. Any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am having trouble proving/disproving the following:




Let ${f_n}_{n=1}^infty$ be a sequence with $f_n:mathbb{N} rightarrow mathbb{R}^+$.
Suppose $$sum_{n = 1}^infty left (sum_{k=1}^infty f_n(k)right) = infty.$$ Prove or disprove that $$sum_{k = 1}^infty left (sum_{n=1}^infty f_n(k)right) = infty.$$




I suspect it is true, and have tried using the definition of a series diverging to $+ infty$, but I don't know how to handle the inner sum. Any help would be appreciated.







real-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Xander Henderson

14.8k103555




14.8k103555










asked Jan 21 at 0:37









user439126user439126

1586




1586




put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, RRL, Xander Henderson, Saad, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會 18 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, RRL, Xander Henderson, Saad, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, RRL, Xander Henderson, Saad, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會 18 hours ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, RRL, Xander Henderson, Saad, GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Try proving the contrapositive (that is, if one is finite, then they’re both finite [and have the same value]). Hint: all of the terms are positive.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    Jan 21 at 0:44










  • $begingroup$
    With the contrapositive, I don't have to worry about divergence (or oscillations) since all the terms are positive , right?
    $endgroup$
    – user439126
    Jan 21 at 0:49










  • $begingroup$
    Correct. ${}{}$
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    Jan 21 at 0:55










  • $begingroup$
    Great, thanks a bunch.
    $endgroup$
    – user439126
    Jan 21 at 0:59














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Try proving the contrapositive (that is, if one is finite, then they’re both finite [and have the same value]). Hint: all of the terms are positive.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    Jan 21 at 0:44










  • $begingroup$
    With the contrapositive, I don't have to worry about divergence (or oscillations) since all the terms are positive , right?
    $endgroup$
    – user439126
    Jan 21 at 0:49










  • $begingroup$
    Correct. ${}{}$
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    Jan 21 at 0:55










  • $begingroup$
    Great, thanks a bunch.
    $endgroup$
    – user439126
    Jan 21 at 0:59








2




2




$begingroup$
Try proving the contrapositive (that is, if one is finite, then they’re both finite [and have the same value]). Hint: all of the terms are positive.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Jan 21 at 0:44




$begingroup$
Try proving the contrapositive (that is, if one is finite, then they’re both finite [and have the same value]). Hint: all of the terms are positive.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Jan 21 at 0:44












$begingroup$
With the contrapositive, I don't have to worry about divergence (or oscillations) since all the terms are positive , right?
$endgroup$
– user439126
Jan 21 at 0:49




$begingroup$
With the contrapositive, I don't have to worry about divergence (or oscillations) since all the terms are positive , right?
$endgroup$
– user439126
Jan 21 at 0:49












$begingroup$
Correct. ${}{}$
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Jan 21 at 0:55




$begingroup$
Correct. ${}{}$
$endgroup$
– Clayton
Jan 21 at 0:55












$begingroup$
Great, thanks a bunch.
$endgroup$
– user439126
Jan 21 at 0:59




$begingroup$
Great, thanks a bunch.
$endgroup$
– user439126
Jan 21 at 0:59










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Hint : Yes it is true, because the terms on the sum are positive. So you can show that both terms are equal to the supremum of the finite sums :
$$ sup_{K, N in mathbf {N}} sum_{n=0}^N sum_{k=0}^K f_n (k) $$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Hint : Yes it is true, because the terms on the sum are positive. So you can show that both terms are equal to the supremum of the finite sums :
    $$ sup_{K, N in mathbf {N}} sum_{n=0}^N sum_{k=0}^K f_n (k) $$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Hint : Yes it is true, because the terms on the sum are positive. So you can show that both terms are equal to the supremum of the finite sums :
      $$ sup_{K, N in mathbf {N}} sum_{n=0}^N sum_{k=0}^K f_n (k) $$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Hint : Yes it is true, because the terms on the sum are positive. So you can show that both terms are equal to the supremum of the finite sums :
        $$ sup_{K, N in mathbf {N}} sum_{n=0}^N sum_{k=0}^K f_n (k) $$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Hint : Yes it is true, because the terms on the sum are positive. So you can show that both terms are equal to the supremum of the finite sums :
        $$ sup_{K, N in mathbf {N}} sum_{n=0}^N sum_{k=0}^K f_n (k) $$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 21 at 0:48









        DLeMeurDLeMeur

        3248




        3248















            Popular posts from this blog

            Nidaros erkebispedøme

            Birsay

            Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...