Simplification of different base logarithmsDifferent log basesDoubt on Logarithms multiplicationYet another...

Short story about cities being connected by a conveyor belt

If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?

I've given my players a lot of magic items. Is it reasonable for me to give them harder encounters?

Can I negotiate a patent idea for a raise, under French law?

Why do we say 'Pairwise Disjoint', rather than 'Disjoint'?

How does learning spells work when leveling a multiclass character?

Is "cogitate" used appropriately in "I cogitate that success relies on hard work"?

Was this cameo in Captain Marvel computer generated?

Short SF story. Females use stingers to implant eggs in yearfathers

Use Mercury as quenching liquid for swords?

Tabular environment - text vertically positions itself by bottom of tikz picture in adjacent cell

Is divide-by-zero a security vulnerability?

How to make sure I'm assertive enough in contact with subordinates?

Is it a Cyclops number? "Nobody" knows!

Boss Telling direct supervisor I snitched

What is Tony Stark injecting into himself in Iron Man 3?

How spaceships determine each other's mass in space?

Did Amazon pay $0 in taxes last year?

Was it really inappropriate to write a pull request for the company I interviewed with?

Can the Witch Sight warlock invocation see through the Mirror Image spell?

Why do we call complex numbers “numbers” but we don’t consider 2-vectors numbers?

I am the person who abides by rules but breaks the rules . Who am I

3.5% Interest Student Loan or use all of my savings on Tuition?

Interpretation of linear regression interaction term plot



Simplification of different base logarithms


Different log basesDoubt on Logarithms multiplicationYet another logarithm multiplication doubtWhat's a good class of functions for bounding/comparing ratios of complicated logarithms?Is this sum of 2 different irrational logarithms irrational: $log_2(3)+log_3(2)$?Simplification of a logarithm expressionIn Need of Logarithms Simplification ExercisesIntroduction to Logarithms and Natural LogsEvaluating $frac{1}{log_2 (100!)} + cdots + frac{1}{log_{100}(100!)}$Which of the following is bigger (logarithms)













3












$begingroup$


I'm in doubt on simplifying the expression:
$log_2 6 - log_4 9$



Working on it I've got: $log_2 6 - dfrac{log_2 9}{2}$



There's anyway to simplify it more ? I'm learning logarithms now so I'm not aware of all properties and tricks.



Thanks in advance










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    I'm in doubt on simplifying the expression:
    $log_2 6 - log_4 9$



    Working on it I've got: $log_2 6 - dfrac{log_2 9}{2}$



    There's anyway to simplify it more ? I'm learning logarithms now so I'm not aware of all properties and tricks.



    Thanks in advance










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3


      3



      $begingroup$


      I'm in doubt on simplifying the expression:
      $log_2 6 - log_4 9$



      Working on it I've got: $log_2 6 - dfrac{log_2 9}{2}$



      There's anyway to simplify it more ? I'm learning logarithms now so I'm not aware of all properties and tricks.



      Thanks in advance










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I'm in doubt on simplifying the expression:
      $log_2 6 - log_4 9$



      Working on it I've got: $log_2 6 - dfrac{log_2 9}{2}$



      There's anyway to simplify it more ? I'm learning logarithms now so I'm not aware of all properties and tricks.



      Thanks in advance







      logarithms






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 18 '12 at 20:58







      aajjbb

















      asked Nov 18 '12 at 20:35









      aajjbbaajjbb

      5252715




      5252715






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          You can do a bit more simplification. The important properties of the log function are, for any base $a>0$,




          • $log_a(bc)=log_ab+log_ac$, so, for example, $log_26=log_22+log_23$

          • $log_a(b/c)=log_ab-log_ac$

          • $log_ab^n=nlog_ab$

          • $log_ab=1/log_ba$

          • $(log_ab)(log_bc)=log_ac$

          • $log_aa=1$


          So, for example, we can simplify $log_26-log_49$ as
          $$
          begin{align}
          log_26-log_49&=log_2(2cdot3)-log_4(3^2) \
          &= log_22+log_23-2log_43 &text{using the first and third identities}\
          &=1+log_23-2log_43 &text{using the sixth identity}\
          &=1+log_23-2log_42log_23 &text{using the fifth}\
          &=1+log_23-2(log_23)/log_24 &text{using the fourth}\
          &=1+log_23-2(log_23)/2 &text{using the third}\
          &=1+log_23-log_23 &text{using a bit of algebra}\
          &=1
          end{align}
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you, this table will helps me a lot. but in the Latex representation, the base is being shadowed by the 'G' of log.
            $endgroup$
            – aajjbb
            Nov 18 '12 at 21:10






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @aajbb Yeah, that happens to a lot of people, myself included. The consensus is that this site's LaTeX processor doesn't play nicely with some browsers. Often, if you simply tell the browser to refresh the page, the problem with overlapping text goes away.
            $endgroup$
            – Rick Decker
            Nov 18 '12 at 21:16



















          2












          $begingroup$

          You're correct so far. Bring out the factor of $frac{1}{2}$ to get $frac{1}{2}(2log_{2}(6)-log_{2}(9))$. Since $alog(b)=log(b^{a})$ $log(a)-log(b)=log(frac{a}{b})$, you get $2log_{2}(6)=log_{2}(6^{2})$, and $$frac{1}{2}(log_{2}(36)-log_{2}(9))=frac{1}{2}left(log_{2}left(frac{36}{9}right)right)=log_{2}(4)/2=2/2=1 $$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            $log_26-frac{log_29}{2}=log_22+log_23-1/2×(2×log_23)=1$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f240103%2fsimplification-of-different-base-logarithms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              4












              $begingroup$

              You can do a bit more simplification. The important properties of the log function are, for any base $a>0$,




              • $log_a(bc)=log_ab+log_ac$, so, for example, $log_26=log_22+log_23$

              • $log_a(b/c)=log_ab-log_ac$

              • $log_ab^n=nlog_ab$

              • $log_ab=1/log_ba$

              • $(log_ab)(log_bc)=log_ac$

              • $log_aa=1$


              So, for example, we can simplify $log_26-log_49$ as
              $$
              begin{align}
              log_26-log_49&=log_2(2cdot3)-log_4(3^2) \
              &= log_22+log_23-2log_43 &text{using the first and third identities}\
              &=1+log_23-2log_43 &text{using the sixth identity}\
              &=1+log_23-2log_42log_23 &text{using the fifth}\
              &=1+log_23-2(log_23)/log_24 &text{using the fourth}\
              &=1+log_23-2(log_23)/2 &text{using the third}\
              &=1+log_23-log_23 &text{using a bit of algebra}\
              &=1
              end{align}
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Thank you, this table will helps me a lot. but in the Latex representation, the base is being shadowed by the 'G' of log.
                $endgroup$
                – aajjbb
                Nov 18 '12 at 21:10






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                @aajbb Yeah, that happens to a lot of people, myself included. The consensus is that this site's LaTeX processor doesn't play nicely with some browsers. Often, if you simply tell the browser to refresh the page, the problem with overlapping text goes away.
                $endgroup$
                – Rick Decker
                Nov 18 '12 at 21:16
















              4












              $begingroup$

              You can do a bit more simplification. The important properties of the log function are, for any base $a>0$,




              • $log_a(bc)=log_ab+log_ac$, so, for example, $log_26=log_22+log_23$

              • $log_a(b/c)=log_ab-log_ac$

              • $log_ab^n=nlog_ab$

              • $log_ab=1/log_ba$

              • $(log_ab)(log_bc)=log_ac$

              • $log_aa=1$


              So, for example, we can simplify $log_26-log_49$ as
              $$
              begin{align}
              log_26-log_49&=log_2(2cdot3)-log_4(3^2) \
              &= log_22+log_23-2log_43 &text{using the first and third identities}\
              &=1+log_23-2log_43 &text{using the sixth identity}\
              &=1+log_23-2log_42log_23 &text{using the fifth}\
              &=1+log_23-2(log_23)/log_24 &text{using the fourth}\
              &=1+log_23-2(log_23)/2 &text{using the third}\
              &=1+log_23-log_23 &text{using a bit of algebra}\
              &=1
              end{align}
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Thank you, this table will helps me a lot. but in the Latex representation, the base is being shadowed by the 'G' of log.
                $endgroup$
                – aajjbb
                Nov 18 '12 at 21:10






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                @aajbb Yeah, that happens to a lot of people, myself included. The consensus is that this site's LaTeX processor doesn't play nicely with some browsers. Often, if you simply tell the browser to refresh the page, the problem with overlapping text goes away.
                $endgroup$
                – Rick Decker
                Nov 18 '12 at 21:16














              4












              4








              4





              $begingroup$

              You can do a bit more simplification. The important properties of the log function are, for any base $a>0$,




              • $log_a(bc)=log_ab+log_ac$, so, for example, $log_26=log_22+log_23$

              • $log_a(b/c)=log_ab-log_ac$

              • $log_ab^n=nlog_ab$

              • $log_ab=1/log_ba$

              • $(log_ab)(log_bc)=log_ac$

              • $log_aa=1$


              So, for example, we can simplify $log_26-log_49$ as
              $$
              begin{align}
              log_26-log_49&=log_2(2cdot3)-log_4(3^2) \
              &= log_22+log_23-2log_43 &text{using the first and third identities}\
              &=1+log_23-2log_43 &text{using the sixth identity}\
              &=1+log_23-2log_42log_23 &text{using the fifth}\
              &=1+log_23-2(log_23)/log_24 &text{using the fourth}\
              &=1+log_23-2(log_23)/2 &text{using the third}\
              &=1+log_23-log_23 &text{using a bit of algebra}\
              &=1
              end{align}
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              You can do a bit more simplification. The important properties of the log function are, for any base $a>0$,




              • $log_a(bc)=log_ab+log_ac$, so, for example, $log_26=log_22+log_23$

              • $log_a(b/c)=log_ab-log_ac$

              • $log_ab^n=nlog_ab$

              • $log_ab=1/log_ba$

              • $(log_ab)(log_bc)=log_ac$

              • $log_aa=1$


              So, for example, we can simplify $log_26-log_49$ as
              $$
              begin{align}
              log_26-log_49&=log_2(2cdot3)-log_4(3^2) \
              &= log_22+log_23-2log_43 &text{using the first and third identities}\
              &=1+log_23-2log_43 &text{using the sixth identity}\
              &=1+log_23-2log_42log_23 &text{using the fifth}\
              &=1+log_23-2(log_23)/log_24 &text{using the fourth}\
              &=1+log_23-2(log_23)/2 &text{using the third}\
              &=1+log_23-log_23 &text{using a bit of algebra}\
              &=1
              end{align}
              $$







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Nov 18 '12 at 21:03









              Rick DeckerRick Decker

              7,63432341




              7,63432341












              • $begingroup$
                Thank you, this table will helps me a lot. but in the Latex representation, the base is being shadowed by the 'G' of log.
                $endgroup$
                – aajjbb
                Nov 18 '12 at 21:10






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                @aajbb Yeah, that happens to a lot of people, myself included. The consensus is that this site's LaTeX processor doesn't play nicely with some browsers. Often, if you simply tell the browser to refresh the page, the problem with overlapping text goes away.
                $endgroup$
                – Rick Decker
                Nov 18 '12 at 21:16


















              • $begingroup$
                Thank you, this table will helps me a lot. but in the Latex representation, the base is being shadowed by the 'G' of log.
                $endgroup$
                – aajjbb
                Nov 18 '12 at 21:10






              • 2




                $begingroup$
                @aajbb Yeah, that happens to a lot of people, myself included. The consensus is that this site's LaTeX processor doesn't play nicely with some browsers. Often, if you simply tell the browser to refresh the page, the problem with overlapping text goes away.
                $endgroup$
                – Rick Decker
                Nov 18 '12 at 21:16
















              $begingroup$
              Thank you, this table will helps me a lot. but in the Latex representation, the base is being shadowed by the 'G' of log.
              $endgroup$
              – aajjbb
              Nov 18 '12 at 21:10




              $begingroup$
              Thank you, this table will helps me a lot. but in the Latex representation, the base is being shadowed by the 'G' of log.
              $endgroup$
              – aajjbb
              Nov 18 '12 at 21:10




              2




              2




              $begingroup$
              @aajbb Yeah, that happens to a lot of people, myself included. The consensus is that this site's LaTeX processor doesn't play nicely with some browsers. Often, if you simply tell the browser to refresh the page, the problem with overlapping text goes away.
              $endgroup$
              – Rick Decker
              Nov 18 '12 at 21:16




              $begingroup$
              @aajbb Yeah, that happens to a lot of people, myself included. The consensus is that this site's LaTeX processor doesn't play nicely with some browsers. Often, if you simply tell the browser to refresh the page, the problem with overlapping text goes away.
              $endgroup$
              – Rick Decker
              Nov 18 '12 at 21:16











              2












              $begingroup$

              You're correct so far. Bring out the factor of $frac{1}{2}$ to get $frac{1}{2}(2log_{2}(6)-log_{2}(9))$. Since $alog(b)=log(b^{a})$ $log(a)-log(b)=log(frac{a}{b})$, you get $2log_{2}(6)=log_{2}(6^{2})$, and $$frac{1}{2}(log_{2}(36)-log_{2}(9))=frac{1}{2}left(log_{2}left(frac{36}{9}right)right)=log_{2}(4)/2=2/2=1 $$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                You're correct so far. Bring out the factor of $frac{1}{2}$ to get $frac{1}{2}(2log_{2}(6)-log_{2}(9))$. Since $alog(b)=log(b^{a})$ $log(a)-log(b)=log(frac{a}{b})$, you get $2log_{2}(6)=log_{2}(6^{2})$, and $$frac{1}{2}(log_{2}(36)-log_{2}(9))=frac{1}{2}left(log_{2}left(frac{36}{9}right)right)=log_{2}(4)/2=2/2=1 $$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  You're correct so far. Bring out the factor of $frac{1}{2}$ to get $frac{1}{2}(2log_{2}(6)-log_{2}(9))$. Since $alog(b)=log(b^{a})$ $log(a)-log(b)=log(frac{a}{b})$, you get $2log_{2}(6)=log_{2}(6^{2})$, and $$frac{1}{2}(log_{2}(36)-log_{2}(9))=frac{1}{2}left(log_{2}left(frac{36}{9}right)right)=log_{2}(4)/2=2/2=1 $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  You're correct so far. Bring out the factor of $frac{1}{2}$ to get $frac{1}{2}(2log_{2}(6)-log_{2}(9))$. Since $alog(b)=log(b^{a})$ $log(a)-log(b)=log(frac{a}{b})$, you get $2log_{2}(6)=log_{2}(6^{2})$, and $$frac{1}{2}(log_{2}(36)-log_{2}(9))=frac{1}{2}left(log_{2}left(frac{36}{9}right)right)=log_{2}(4)/2=2/2=1 $$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 18 '12 at 20:44









                  preferred_anonpreferred_anon

                  13k11743




                  13k11743























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      $log_26-frac{log_29}{2}=log_22+log_23-1/2×(2×log_23)=1$






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        $log_26-frac{log_29}{2}=log_22+log_23-1/2×(2×log_23)=1$






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          $log_26-frac{log_29}{2}=log_22+log_23-1/2×(2×log_23)=1$






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          $log_26-frac{log_29}{2}=log_22+log_23-1/2×(2×log_23)=1$







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Nov 18 '12 at 20:44









                          Ziqian XieZiqian Xie

                          604515




                          604515






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f240103%2fsimplification-of-different-base-logarithms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Nidaros erkebispedøme

                              Birsay

                              Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...