How do I Prove the direct product of two subgroups is a subgroup? [on hold]is every subgroup of a semi-direct...

Unfamiliar notation in Diabelli's "Duet in D" for piano

Does the US political system, in principle, allow for a no-party system?

How to recover against Snake as a heavyweight character?

Does an unused member variable take up memory?

Why isn't P and P/poly trivially the same?

How to make sure I'm assertive enough in contact with subordinates?

A running toilet that stops itself

Did Amazon pay $0 in taxes last year?

PTIJ: Sport in the Torah

Tabular environment - text vertically positions itself by bottom of tikz picture in adjacent cell

The (Easy) Road to Code

Too soon for a plot twist?

How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?

How to install "rounded" brake pads

Can I challenge the interviewer to give me a proper technical feedback?

Can I negotiate a patent idea for a raise, under French law?

Can Witch Sight see through Mirror Image?

Limpar string com Regex

Having the player face themselves after the mid-game

Use Mercury as quenching liquid for swords?

Was it really inappropriate to write a pull request for the company I interviewed with?

Why do we say 'Pairwise Disjoint', rather than 'Disjoint'?

Vector-transposing function

Help! My Character is too much for her story!



How do I Prove the direct product of two subgroups is a subgroup? [on hold]


is every subgroup of a semi-direct product of groups a semi-direct product of subgroups?Proving the direct product D of two groups G & H has a normal subgroup N such that N isomorphic to G and D/N isomorphic to HSubgroup of a Direct ProductIs any subgroup of a direct product isomorphic to a direct product of subgroups?Sylow p-subgroup of a direct product is product of Sylow p-subgroups of factorsProve the direct product of two subgroups is a subgroupOn a maximal subgroup of the direct product of groupsDirect product and Sylow subgroupsDirect product for minimal normal subgroupSubgroup of the direct product of groups













-3












$begingroup$


Let $P$ be a subgroup of the group $G$ and $Q$ be a subgroup of the group $H$. How would you Prove that:
$P times Q$ is a subgroup of the direct product $G times H$.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




George Hall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$



put on hold as off-topic by verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















  • $begingroup$
    What did you try? Let's start from the beginning: do you know what is the definition of a subgroup?
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Using the Subgroup test, I can prove that the group is closed under taking inverses but I do not understand how to show that it is closed under the binary operation
    $endgroup$
    – George Hall
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Let's suppose $(p_1,q_1)$ and $(p_2,q_2)$ are elements in $Ptimes Q$. What is their product by definition?
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    (p1p2) and (q1,q2) ?
    $endgroup$
    – George Hall
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    The operation is multiplying in every coordinate. So it is $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$. Well, can you see why is it in $Ptimes Q$?
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    yesterday
















-3












$begingroup$


Let $P$ be a subgroup of the group $G$ and $Q$ be a subgroup of the group $H$. How would you Prove that:
$P times Q$ is a subgroup of the direct product $G times H$.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




George Hall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$



put on hold as off-topic by verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















  • $begingroup$
    What did you try? Let's start from the beginning: do you know what is the definition of a subgroup?
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Using the Subgroup test, I can prove that the group is closed under taking inverses but I do not understand how to show that it is closed under the binary operation
    $endgroup$
    – George Hall
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Let's suppose $(p_1,q_1)$ and $(p_2,q_2)$ are elements in $Ptimes Q$. What is their product by definition?
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    (p1p2) and (q1,q2) ?
    $endgroup$
    – George Hall
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    The operation is multiplying in every coordinate. So it is $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$. Well, can you see why is it in $Ptimes Q$?
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    yesterday














-3












-3








-3





$begingroup$


Let $P$ be a subgroup of the group $G$ and $Q$ be a subgroup of the group $H$. How would you Prove that:
$P times Q$ is a subgroup of the direct product $G times H$.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




George Hall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Let $P$ be a subgroup of the group $G$ and $Q$ be a subgroup of the group $H$. How would you Prove that:
$P times Q$ is a subgroup of the direct product $G times H$.







group-theory normal-subgroups






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




George Hall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




George Hall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Vinyl_cape_jawa

3,32211333




3,32211333






New contributor




George Hall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









George HallGeorge Hall

11




11




New contributor




George Hall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





George Hall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






George Hall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as off-topic by verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







put on hold as off-topic by verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • $begingroup$
    What did you try? Let's start from the beginning: do you know what is the definition of a subgroup?
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Using the Subgroup test, I can prove that the group is closed under taking inverses but I do not understand how to show that it is closed under the binary operation
    $endgroup$
    – George Hall
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Let's suppose $(p_1,q_1)$ and $(p_2,q_2)$ are elements in $Ptimes Q$. What is their product by definition?
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    (p1p2) and (q1,q2) ?
    $endgroup$
    – George Hall
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    The operation is multiplying in every coordinate. So it is $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$. Well, can you see why is it in $Ptimes Q$?
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    yesterday


















  • $begingroup$
    What did you try? Let's start from the beginning: do you know what is the definition of a subgroup?
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    yesterday












  • $begingroup$
    Using the Subgroup test, I can prove that the group is closed under taking inverses but I do not understand how to show that it is closed under the binary operation
    $endgroup$
    – George Hall
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Let's suppose $(p_1,q_1)$ and $(p_2,q_2)$ are elements in $Ptimes Q$. What is their product by definition?
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    (p1p2) and (q1,q2) ?
    $endgroup$
    – George Hall
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    The operation is multiplying in every coordinate. So it is $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$. Well, can you see why is it in $Ptimes Q$?
    $endgroup$
    – Mark
    yesterday
















$begingroup$
What did you try? Let's start from the beginning: do you know what is the definition of a subgroup?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday






$begingroup$
What did you try? Let's start from the beginning: do you know what is the definition of a subgroup?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday














$begingroup$
Using the Subgroup test, I can prove that the group is closed under taking inverses but I do not understand how to show that it is closed under the binary operation
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday




$begingroup$
Using the Subgroup test, I can prove that the group is closed under taking inverses but I do not understand how to show that it is closed under the binary operation
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday












$begingroup$
Let's suppose $(p_1,q_1)$ and $(p_2,q_2)$ are elements in $Ptimes Q$. What is their product by definition?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday




$begingroup$
Let's suppose $(p_1,q_1)$ and $(p_2,q_2)$ are elements in $Ptimes Q$. What is their product by definition?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday












$begingroup$
(p1p2) and (q1,q2) ?
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday




$begingroup$
(p1p2) and (q1,q2) ?
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday












$begingroup$
The operation is multiplying in every coordinate. So it is $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$. Well, can you see why is it in $Ptimes Q$?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday




$begingroup$
The operation is multiplying in every coordinate. So it is $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$. Well, can you see why is it in $Ptimes Q$?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

If $P leq G$ and $Q le H$, we want to show that $P times Q le G times H$.



First, $P times Q = {(p,q) : p in P wedge q in Q }$, while $G times H = {(g,h) : g in G wedge h in H}$.



The product is defined by $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) = (p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$.



Let's check the group axoims:



G1: For all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$, $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$.



Since $P$ and $Q$ are groups, $p_1p_2 in P$ and $q_1q_2 in Q$, so $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2) in P times Q$.



G2: Associativity is inherited from $P$ and $Q$.



$[(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2)]cdot(p_3,q_3) = (p_1,q_1) cdot [(p_2,q_2)cdot(p_3,q_3)]$



because $(p_1p_2)p_3=p_1(p_2p_3)$ and $(q_1q_2)q_3 = q_1(q_2q_3)$



G3: The identity element is $(e_P,e_Q) in P times Q$,



where $e_P in P$ and $e_Q in Q$ are the identity elements of $P$ and $Q$.



G4: The inverse of $(p,q) in P times Q$ is $(p^{-1},q^{-1}) in P times Q$



where $p^{-1} in P$ is the inverse of $p in P$ and $q^{-1} in Q$ is the inverse of $q in Q$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    The fastest way would be using the following fact:




    Let $G$ be a group and let $H$ be a subset of $G$. Then $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ $iff$ $H$ is nonempty and $ab^{-1}in H$, for all $a,bin H$




    In your case we have to show the following:




    • $Ptimes Q$ is nonempty


    • $(p_1,q_1)cdot (p_2,q_2)^{-1}in Ptimes Q$ for all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2)in Ptimes Q$



    Firstly $P$ and $Q$ are subgroups themselves so they at least should have an identity element hence they are nonempty, whence their direct product is nonempty.



    The second requirement follows from the fact that $P$ and $Q$ were subgroups themselves.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0












      $begingroup$

      If $P leq G$ and $Q le H$, we want to show that $P times Q le G times H$.



      First, $P times Q = {(p,q) : p in P wedge q in Q }$, while $G times H = {(g,h) : g in G wedge h in H}$.



      The product is defined by $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) = (p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$.



      Let's check the group axoims:



      G1: For all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$, $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$.



      Since $P$ and $Q$ are groups, $p_1p_2 in P$ and $q_1q_2 in Q$, so $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2) in P times Q$.



      G2: Associativity is inherited from $P$ and $Q$.



      $[(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2)]cdot(p_3,q_3) = (p_1,q_1) cdot [(p_2,q_2)cdot(p_3,q_3)]$



      because $(p_1p_2)p_3=p_1(p_2p_3)$ and $(q_1q_2)q_3 = q_1(q_2q_3)$



      G3: The identity element is $(e_P,e_Q) in P times Q$,



      where $e_P in P$ and $e_Q in Q$ are the identity elements of $P$ and $Q$.



      G4: The inverse of $(p,q) in P times Q$ is $(p^{-1},q^{-1}) in P times Q$



      where $p^{-1} in P$ is the inverse of $p in P$ and $q^{-1} in Q$ is the inverse of $q in Q$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        0












        $begingroup$

        If $P leq G$ and $Q le H$, we want to show that $P times Q le G times H$.



        First, $P times Q = {(p,q) : p in P wedge q in Q }$, while $G times H = {(g,h) : g in G wedge h in H}$.



        The product is defined by $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) = (p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$.



        Let's check the group axoims:



        G1: For all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$, $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$.



        Since $P$ and $Q$ are groups, $p_1p_2 in P$ and $q_1q_2 in Q$, so $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2) in P times Q$.



        G2: Associativity is inherited from $P$ and $Q$.



        $[(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2)]cdot(p_3,q_3) = (p_1,q_1) cdot [(p_2,q_2)cdot(p_3,q_3)]$



        because $(p_1p_2)p_3=p_1(p_2p_3)$ and $(q_1q_2)q_3 = q_1(q_2q_3)$



        G3: The identity element is $(e_P,e_Q) in P times Q$,



        where $e_P in P$ and $e_Q in Q$ are the identity elements of $P$ and $Q$.



        G4: The inverse of $(p,q) in P times Q$ is $(p^{-1},q^{-1}) in P times Q$



        where $p^{-1} in P$ is the inverse of $p in P$ and $q^{-1} in Q$ is the inverse of $q in Q$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          If $P leq G$ and $Q le H$, we want to show that $P times Q le G times H$.



          First, $P times Q = {(p,q) : p in P wedge q in Q }$, while $G times H = {(g,h) : g in G wedge h in H}$.



          The product is defined by $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) = (p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$.



          Let's check the group axoims:



          G1: For all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$, $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$.



          Since $P$ and $Q$ are groups, $p_1p_2 in P$ and $q_1q_2 in Q$, so $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2) in P times Q$.



          G2: Associativity is inherited from $P$ and $Q$.



          $[(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2)]cdot(p_3,q_3) = (p_1,q_1) cdot [(p_2,q_2)cdot(p_3,q_3)]$



          because $(p_1p_2)p_3=p_1(p_2p_3)$ and $(q_1q_2)q_3 = q_1(q_2q_3)$



          G3: The identity element is $(e_P,e_Q) in P times Q$,



          where $e_P in P$ and $e_Q in Q$ are the identity elements of $P$ and $Q$.



          G4: The inverse of $(p,q) in P times Q$ is $(p^{-1},q^{-1}) in P times Q$



          where $p^{-1} in P$ is the inverse of $p in P$ and $q^{-1} in Q$ is the inverse of $q in Q$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          If $P leq G$ and $Q le H$, we want to show that $P times Q le G times H$.



          First, $P times Q = {(p,q) : p in P wedge q in Q }$, while $G times H = {(g,h) : g in G wedge h in H}$.



          The product is defined by $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) = (p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$.



          Let's check the group axoims:



          G1: For all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$, $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$.



          Since $P$ and $Q$ are groups, $p_1p_2 in P$ and $q_1q_2 in Q$, so $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2) in P times Q$.



          G2: Associativity is inherited from $P$ and $Q$.



          $[(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2)]cdot(p_3,q_3) = (p_1,q_1) cdot [(p_2,q_2)cdot(p_3,q_3)]$



          because $(p_1p_2)p_3=p_1(p_2p_3)$ and $(q_1q_2)q_3 = q_1(q_2q_3)$



          G3: The identity element is $(e_P,e_Q) in P times Q$,



          where $e_P in P$ and $e_Q in Q$ are the identity elements of $P$ and $Q$.



          G4: The inverse of $(p,q) in P times Q$ is $(p^{-1},q^{-1}) in P times Q$



          where $p^{-1} in P$ is the inverse of $p in P$ and $q^{-1} in Q$ is the inverse of $q in Q$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          Fly by NightFly by Night

          26k32978




          26k32978























              0












              $begingroup$

              The fastest way would be using the following fact:




              Let $G$ be a group and let $H$ be a subset of $G$. Then $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ $iff$ $H$ is nonempty and $ab^{-1}in H$, for all $a,bin H$




              In your case we have to show the following:




              • $Ptimes Q$ is nonempty


              • $(p_1,q_1)cdot (p_2,q_2)^{-1}in Ptimes Q$ for all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2)in Ptimes Q$



              Firstly $P$ and $Q$ are subgroups themselves so they at least should have an identity element hence they are nonempty, whence their direct product is nonempty.



              The second requirement follows from the fact that $P$ and $Q$ were subgroups themselves.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                The fastest way would be using the following fact:




                Let $G$ be a group and let $H$ be a subset of $G$. Then $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ $iff$ $H$ is nonempty and $ab^{-1}in H$, for all $a,bin H$




                In your case we have to show the following:




                • $Ptimes Q$ is nonempty


                • $(p_1,q_1)cdot (p_2,q_2)^{-1}in Ptimes Q$ for all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2)in Ptimes Q$



                Firstly $P$ and $Q$ are subgroups themselves so they at least should have an identity element hence they are nonempty, whence their direct product is nonempty.



                The second requirement follows from the fact that $P$ and $Q$ were subgroups themselves.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  The fastest way would be using the following fact:




                  Let $G$ be a group and let $H$ be a subset of $G$. Then $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ $iff$ $H$ is nonempty and $ab^{-1}in H$, for all $a,bin H$




                  In your case we have to show the following:




                  • $Ptimes Q$ is nonempty


                  • $(p_1,q_1)cdot (p_2,q_2)^{-1}in Ptimes Q$ for all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2)in Ptimes Q$



                  Firstly $P$ and $Q$ are subgroups themselves so they at least should have an identity element hence they are nonempty, whence their direct product is nonempty.



                  The second requirement follows from the fact that $P$ and $Q$ were subgroups themselves.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  The fastest way would be using the following fact:




                  Let $G$ be a group and let $H$ be a subset of $G$. Then $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ $iff$ $H$ is nonempty and $ab^{-1}in H$, for all $a,bin H$




                  In your case we have to show the following:




                  • $Ptimes Q$ is nonempty


                  • $(p_1,q_1)cdot (p_2,q_2)^{-1}in Ptimes Q$ for all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2)in Ptimes Q$



                  Firstly $P$ and $Q$ are subgroups themselves so they at least should have an identity element hence they are nonempty, whence their direct product is nonempty.



                  The second requirement follows from the fact that $P$ and $Q$ were subgroups themselves.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered yesterday









                  Vinyl_cape_jawaVinyl_cape_jawa

                  3,32211333




                  3,32211333















                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Nidaros erkebispedøme

                      Birsay

                      Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...