How do I Prove the direct product of two subgroups is a subgroup? [on hold]is every subgroup of a semi-direct...
Unfamiliar notation in Diabelli's "Duet in D" for piano
Does the US political system, in principle, allow for a no-party system?
How to recover against Snake as a heavyweight character?
Does an unused member variable take up memory?
Why isn't P and P/poly trivially the same?
How to make sure I'm assertive enough in contact with subordinates?
A running toilet that stops itself
Did Amazon pay $0 in taxes last year?
PTIJ: Sport in the Torah
Tabular environment - text vertically positions itself by bottom of tikz picture in adjacent cell
The (Easy) Road to Code
Too soon for a plot twist?
How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?
How to install "rounded" brake pads
Can I challenge the interviewer to give me a proper technical feedback?
Can I negotiate a patent idea for a raise, under French law?
Can Witch Sight see through Mirror Image?
Limpar string com Regex
Having the player face themselves after the mid-game
Use Mercury as quenching liquid for swords?
Was it really inappropriate to write a pull request for the company I interviewed with?
Why do we say 'Pairwise Disjoint', rather than 'Disjoint'?
Vector-transposing function
Help! My Character is too much for her story!
How do I Prove the direct product of two subgroups is a subgroup? [on hold]
is every subgroup of a semi-direct product of groups a semi-direct product of subgroups?Proving the direct product D of two groups G & H has a normal subgroup N such that N isomorphic to G and D/N isomorphic to HSubgroup of a Direct ProductIs any subgroup of a direct product isomorphic to a direct product of subgroups?Sylow p-subgroup of a direct product is product of Sylow p-subgroups of factorsProve the direct product of two subgroups is a subgroupOn a maximal subgroup of the direct product of groupsDirect product and Sylow subgroupsDirect product for minimal normal subgroupSubgroup of the direct product of groups
$begingroup$
Let $P$ be a subgroup of the group $G$ and $Q$ be a subgroup of the group $H$. How would you Prove that:
$P times Q$ is a subgroup of the direct product $G times H$.
group-theory normal-subgroups
New contributor
George Hall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
put on hold as off-topic by verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $P$ be a subgroup of the group $G$ and $Q$ be a subgroup of the group $H$. How would you Prove that:
$P times Q$ is a subgroup of the direct product $G times H$.
group-theory normal-subgroups
New contributor
George Hall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
put on hold as off-topic by verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
$begingroup$
What did you try? Let's start from the beginning: do you know what is the definition of a subgroup?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
Using the Subgroup test, I can prove that the group is closed under taking inverses but I do not understand how to show that it is closed under the binary operation
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
Let's suppose $(p_1,q_1)$ and $(p_2,q_2)$ are elements in $Ptimes Q$. What is their product by definition?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
(p1p2) and (q1,q2) ?
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
The operation is multiplying in every coordinate. So it is $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$. Well, can you see why is it in $Ptimes Q$?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $P$ be a subgroup of the group $G$ and $Q$ be a subgroup of the group $H$. How would you Prove that:
$P times Q$ is a subgroup of the direct product $G times H$.
group-theory normal-subgroups
New contributor
George Hall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Let $P$ be a subgroup of the group $G$ and $Q$ be a subgroup of the group $H$. How would you Prove that:
$P times Q$ is a subgroup of the direct product $G times H$.
group-theory normal-subgroups
group-theory normal-subgroups
New contributor
George Hall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
George Hall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited yesterday
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6226e/6226ed8f1bc08151e9781f078e35788df5305ffb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6226e/6226ed8f1bc08151e9781f078e35788df5305ffb" alt=""
Vinyl_cape_jawa
3,32211333
3,32211333
New contributor
George Hall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
George HallGeorge Hall
11
11
New contributor
George Hall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
George Hall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
George Hall is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
$begingroup$
What did you try? Let's start from the beginning: do you know what is the definition of a subgroup?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
Using the Subgroup test, I can prove that the group is closed under taking inverses but I do not understand how to show that it is closed under the binary operation
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
Let's suppose $(p_1,q_1)$ and $(p_2,q_2)$ are elements in $Ptimes Q$. What is their product by definition?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
(p1p2) and (q1,q2) ?
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
The operation is multiplying in every coordinate. So it is $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$. Well, can you see why is it in $Ptimes Q$?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
What did you try? Let's start from the beginning: do you know what is the definition of a subgroup?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
Using the Subgroup test, I can prove that the group is closed under taking inverses but I do not understand how to show that it is closed under the binary operation
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
Let's suppose $(p_1,q_1)$ and $(p_2,q_2)$ are elements in $Ptimes Q$. What is their product by definition?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
(p1p2) and (q1,q2) ?
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
The operation is multiplying in every coordinate. So it is $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$. Well, can you see why is it in $Ptimes Q$?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
What did you try? Let's start from the beginning: do you know what is the definition of a subgroup?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
What did you try? Let's start from the beginning: do you know what is the definition of a subgroup?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
Using the Subgroup test, I can prove that the group is closed under taking inverses but I do not understand how to show that it is closed under the binary operation
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
Using the Subgroup test, I can prove that the group is closed under taking inverses but I do not understand how to show that it is closed under the binary operation
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
Let's suppose $(p_1,q_1)$ and $(p_2,q_2)$ are elements in $Ptimes Q$. What is their product by definition?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
Let's suppose $(p_1,q_1)$ and $(p_2,q_2)$ are elements in $Ptimes Q$. What is their product by definition?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
(p1p2) and (q1,q2) ?
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
(p1p2) and (q1,q2) ?
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
The operation is multiplying in every coordinate. So it is $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$. Well, can you see why is it in $Ptimes Q$?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
The operation is multiplying in every coordinate. So it is $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$. Well, can you see why is it in $Ptimes Q$?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $P leq G$ and $Q le H$, we want to show that $P times Q le G times H$.
First, $P times Q = {(p,q) : p in P wedge q in Q }$, while $G times H = {(g,h) : g in G wedge h in H}$.
The product is defined by $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) = (p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$.
Let's check the group axoims:
G1: For all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$, $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$.
Since $P$ and $Q$ are groups, $p_1p_2 in P$ and $q_1q_2 in Q$, so $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2) in P times Q$.
G2: Associativity is inherited from $P$ and $Q$.
$[(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2)]cdot(p_3,q_3) = (p_1,q_1) cdot [(p_2,q_2)cdot(p_3,q_3)]$
because $(p_1p_2)p_3=p_1(p_2p_3)$ and $(q_1q_2)q_3 = q_1(q_2q_3)$
G3: The identity element is $(e_P,e_Q) in P times Q$,
where $e_P in P$ and $e_Q in Q$ are the identity elements of $P$ and $Q$.
G4: The inverse of $(p,q) in P times Q$ is $(p^{-1},q^{-1}) in P times Q$
where $p^{-1} in P$ is the inverse of $p in P$ and $q^{-1} in Q$ is the inverse of $q in Q$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The fastest way would be using the following fact:
Let $G$ be a group and let $H$ be a subset of $G$. Then $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ $iff$ $H$ is nonempty and $ab^{-1}in H$, for all $a,bin H$
In your case we have to show the following:
$Ptimes Q$ is nonempty
$(p_1,q_1)cdot (p_2,q_2)^{-1}in Ptimes Q$ for all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2)in Ptimes Q$
Firstly $P$ and $Q$ are subgroups themselves so they at least should have an identity element hence they are nonempty, whence their direct product is nonempty.
The second requirement follows from the fact that $P$ and $Q$ were subgroups themselves.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $P leq G$ and $Q le H$, we want to show that $P times Q le G times H$.
First, $P times Q = {(p,q) : p in P wedge q in Q }$, while $G times H = {(g,h) : g in G wedge h in H}$.
The product is defined by $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) = (p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$.
Let's check the group axoims:
G1: For all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$, $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$.
Since $P$ and $Q$ are groups, $p_1p_2 in P$ and $q_1q_2 in Q$, so $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2) in P times Q$.
G2: Associativity is inherited from $P$ and $Q$.
$[(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2)]cdot(p_3,q_3) = (p_1,q_1) cdot [(p_2,q_2)cdot(p_3,q_3)]$
because $(p_1p_2)p_3=p_1(p_2p_3)$ and $(q_1q_2)q_3 = q_1(q_2q_3)$
G3: The identity element is $(e_P,e_Q) in P times Q$,
where $e_P in P$ and $e_Q in Q$ are the identity elements of $P$ and $Q$.
G4: The inverse of $(p,q) in P times Q$ is $(p^{-1},q^{-1}) in P times Q$
where $p^{-1} in P$ is the inverse of $p in P$ and $q^{-1} in Q$ is the inverse of $q in Q$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $P leq G$ and $Q le H$, we want to show that $P times Q le G times H$.
First, $P times Q = {(p,q) : p in P wedge q in Q }$, while $G times H = {(g,h) : g in G wedge h in H}$.
The product is defined by $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) = (p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$.
Let's check the group axoims:
G1: For all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$, $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$.
Since $P$ and $Q$ are groups, $p_1p_2 in P$ and $q_1q_2 in Q$, so $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2) in P times Q$.
G2: Associativity is inherited from $P$ and $Q$.
$[(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2)]cdot(p_3,q_3) = (p_1,q_1) cdot [(p_2,q_2)cdot(p_3,q_3)]$
because $(p_1p_2)p_3=p_1(p_2p_3)$ and $(q_1q_2)q_3 = q_1(q_2q_3)$
G3: The identity element is $(e_P,e_Q) in P times Q$,
where $e_P in P$ and $e_Q in Q$ are the identity elements of $P$ and $Q$.
G4: The inverse of $(p,q) in P times Q$ is $(p^{-1},q^{-1}) in P times Q$
where $p^{-1} in P$ is the inverse of $p in P$ and $q^{-1} in Q$ is the inverse of $q in Q$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $P leq G$ and $Q le H$, we want to show that $P times Q le G times H$.
First, $P times Q = {(p,q) : p in P wedge q in Q }$, while $G times H = {(g,h) : g in G wedge h in H}$.
The product is defined by $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) = (p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$.
Let's check the group axoims:
G1: For all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$, $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$.
Since $P$ and $Q$ are groups, $p_1p_2 in P$ and $q_1q_2 in Q$, so $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2) in P times Q$.
G2: Associativity is inherited from $P$ and $Q$.
$[(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2)]cdot(p_3,q_3) = (p_1,q_1) cdot [(p_2,q_2)cdot(p_3,q_3)]$
because $(p_1p_2)p_3=p_1(p_2p_3)$ and $(q_1q_2)q_3 = q_1(q_2q_3)$
G3: The identity element is $(e_P,e_Q) in P times Q$,
where $e_P in P$ and $e_Q in Q$ are the identity elements of $P$ and $Q$.
G4: The inverse of $(p,q) in P times Q$ is $(p^{-1},q^{-1}) in P times Q$
where $p^{-1} in P$ is the inverse of $p in P$ and $q^{-1} in Q$ is the inverse of $q in Q$.
$endgroup$
If $P leq G$ and $Q le H$, we want to show that $P times Q le G times H$.
First, $P times Q = {(p,q) : p in P wedge q in Q }$, while $G times H = {(g,h) : g in G wedge h in H}$.
The product is defined by $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) = (p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$.
Let's check the group axoims:
G1: For all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$, $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$.
Since $P$ and $Q$ are groups, $p_1p_2 in P$ and $q_1q_2 in Q$, so $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2) in P times Q$.
G2: Associativity is inherited from $P$ and $Q$.
$[(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2)]cdot(p_3,q_3) = (p_1,q_1) cdot [(p_2,q_2)cdot(p_3,q_3)]$
because $(p_1p_2)p_3=p_1(p_2p_3)$ and $(q_1q_2)q_3 = q_1(q_2q_3)$
G3: The identity element is $(e_P,e_Q) in P times Q$,
where $e_P in P$ and $e_Q in Q$ are the identity elements of $P$ and $Q$.
G4: The inverse of $(p,q) in P times Q$ is $(p^{-1},q^{-1}) in P times Q$
where $p^{-1} in P$ is the inverse of $p in P$ and $q^{-1} in Q$ is the inverse of $q in Q$.
answered yesterday
Fly by NightFly by Night
26k32978
26k32978
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The fastest way would be using the following fact:
Let $G$ be a group and let $H$ be a subset of $G$. Then $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ $iff$ $H$ is nonempty and $ab^{-1}in H$, for all $a,bin H$
In your case we have to show the following:
$Ptimes Q$ is nonempty
$(p_1,q_1)cdot (p_2,q_2)^{-1}in Ptimes Q$ for all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2)in Ptimes Q$
Firstly $P$ and $Q$ are subgroups themselves so they at least should have an identity element hence they are nonempty, whence their direct product is nonempty.
The second requirement follows from the fact that $P$ and $Q$ were subgroups themselves.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The fastest way would be using the following fact:
Let $G$ be a group and let $H$ be a subset of $G$. Then $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ $iff$ $H$ is nonempty and $ab^{-1}in H$, for all $a,bin H$
In your case we have to show the following:
$Ptimes Q$ is nonempty
$(p_1,q_1)cdot (p_2,q_2)^{-1}in Ptimes Q$ for all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2)in Ptimes Q$
Firstly $P$ and $Q$ are subgroups themselves so they at least should have an identity element hence they are nonempty, whence their direct product is nonempty.
The second requirement follows from the fact that $P$ and $Q$ were subgroups themselves.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The fastest way would be using the following fact:
Let $G$ be a group and let $H$ be a subset of $G$. Then $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ $iff$ $H$ is nonempty and $ab^{-1}in H$, for all $a,bin H$
In your case we have to show the following:
$Ptimes Q$ is nonempty
$(p_1,q_1)cdot (p_2,q_2)^{-1}in Ptimes Q$ for all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2)in Ptimes Q$
Firstly $P$ and $Q$ are subgroups themselves so they at least should have an identity element hence they are nonempty, whence their direct product is nonempty.
The second requirement follows from the fact that $P$ and $Q$ were subgroups themselves.
$endgroup$
The fastest way would be using the following fact:
Let $G$ be a group and let $H$ be a subset of $G$. Then $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ $iff$ $H$ is nonempty and $ab^{-1}in H$, for all $a,bin H$
In your case we have to show the following:
$Ptimes Q$ is nonempty
$(p_1,q_1)cdot (p_2,q_2)^{-1}in Ptimes Q$ for all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2)in Ptimes Q$
Firstly $P$ and $Q$ are subgroups themselves so they at least should have an identity element hence they are nonempty, whence their direct product is nonempty.
The second requirement follows from the fact that $P$ and $Q$ were subgroups themselves.
answered yesterday
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6226e/6226ed8f1bc08151e9781f078e35788df5305ffb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6226e/6226ed8f1bc08151e9781f078e35788df5305ffb" alt=""
Vinyl_cape_jawaVinyl_cape_jawa
3,32211333
3,32211333
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What did you try? Let's start from the beginning: do you know what is the definition of a subgroup?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
Using the Subgroup test, I can prove that the group is closed under taking inverses but I do not understand how to show that it is closed under the binary operation
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
Let's suppose $(p_1,q_1)$ and $(p_2,q_2)$ are elements in $Ptimes Q$. What is their product by definition?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
(p1p2) and (q1,q2) ?
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
The operation is multiplying in every coordinate. So it is $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$. Well, can you see why is it in $Ptimes Q$?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday