How do I Prove the direct product of two subgroups is a subgroup? [on hold]is every subgroup of a semi-direct...
Unfamiliar notation in Diabelli's "Duet in D" for piano
Does the US political system, in principle, allow for a no-party system?
How to recover against Snake as a heavyweight character?
Does an unused member variable take up memory?
Why isn't P and P/poly trivially the same?
How to make sure I'm assertive enough in contact with subordinates?
A running toilet that stops itself
Did Amazon pay $0 in taxes last year?
PTIJ: Sport in the Torah
Tabular environment - text vertically positions itself by bottom of tikz picture in adjacent cell
The (Easy) Road to Code
Too soon for a plot twist?
How to write a chaotic neutral protagonist and prevent my readers from thinking they are evil?
How to install "rounded" brake pads
Can I challenge the interviewer to give me a proper technical feedback?
Can I negotiate a patent idea for a raise, under French law?
Can Witch Sight see through Mirror Image?
Limpar string com Regex
Having the player face themselves after the mid-game
Use Mercury as quenching liquid for swords?
Was it really inappropriate to write a pull request for the company I interviewed with?
Why do we say 'Pairwise Disjoint', rather than 'Disjoint'?
Vector-transposing function
Help! My Character is too much for her story!
How do I Prove the direct product of two subgroups is a subgroup? [on hold]
is every subgroup of a semi-direct product of groups a semi-direct product of subgroups?Proving the direct product D of two groups G & H has a normal subgroup N such that N isomorphic to G and D/N isomorphic to HSubgroup of a Direct ProductIs any subgroup of a direct product isomorphic to a direct product of subgroups?Sylow p-subgroup of a direct product is product of Sylow p-subgroups of factorsProve the direct product of two subgroups is a subgroupOn a maximal subgroup of the direct product of groupsDirect product and Sylow subgroupsDirect product for minimal normal subgroupSubgroup of the direct product of groups
$begingroup$
Let $P$ be a subgroup of the group $G$ and $Q$ be a subgroup of the group $H$. How would you Prove that:
$P times Q$ is a subgroup of the direct product $G times H$.
group-theory normal-subgroups
New contributor
$endgroup$
put on hold as off-topic by verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $P$ be a subgroup of the group $G$ and $Q$ be a subgroup of the group $H$. How would you Prove that:
$P times Q$ is a subgroup of the direct product $G times H$.
group-theory normal-subgroups
New contributor
$endgroup$
put on hold as off-topic by verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
$begingroup$
What did you try? Let's start from the beginning: do you know what is the definition of a subgroup?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
Using the Subgroup test, I can prove that the group is closed under taking inverses but I do not understand how to show that it is closed under the binary operation
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
Let's suppose $(p_1,q_1)$ and $(p_2,q_2)$ are elements in $Ptimes Q$. What is their product by definition?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
(p1p2) and (q1,q2) ?
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
The operation is multiplying in every coordinate. So it is $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$. Well, can you see why is it in $Ptimes Q$?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $P$ be a subgroup of the group $G$ and $Q$ be a subgroup of the group $H$. How would you Prove that:
$P times Q$ is a subgroup of the direct product $G times H$.
group-theory normal-subgroups
New contributor
$endgroup$
Let $P$ be a subgroup of the group $G$ and $Q$ be a subgroup of the group $H$. How would you Prove that:
$P times Q$ is a subgroup of the direct product $G times H$.
group-theory normal-subgroups
group-theory normal-subgroups
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
Vinyl_cape_jawa
3,32211333
3,32211333
New contributor
asked yesterday
George HallGeorge Hall
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – verret, Mark, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
$begingroup$
What did you try? Let's start from the beginning: do you know what is the definition of a subgroup?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
Using the Subgroup test, I can prove that the group is closed under taking inverses but I do not understand how to show that it is closed under the binary operation
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
Let's suppose $(p_1,q_1)$ and $(p_2,q_2)$ are elements in $Ptimes Q$. What is their product by definition?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
(p1p2) and (q1,q2) ?
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
The operation is multiplying in every coordinate. So it is $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$. Well, can you see why is it in $Ptimes Q$?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
What did you try? Let's start from the beginning: do you know what is the definition of a subgroup?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
Using the Subgroup test, I can prove that the group is closed under taking inverses but I do not understand how to show that it is closed under the binary operation
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
Let's suppose $(p_1,q_1)$ and $(p_2,q_2)$ are elements in $Ptimes Q$. What is their product by definition?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
(p1p2) and (q1,q2) ?
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
The operation is multiplying in every coordinate. So it is $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$. Well, can you see why is it in $Ptimes Q$?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
What did you try? Let's start from the beginning: do you know what is the definition of a subgroup?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
What did you try? Let's start from the beginning: do you know what is the definition of a subgroup?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
Using the Subgroup test, I can prove that the group is closed under taking inverses but I do not understand how to show that it is closed under the binary operation
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
Using the Subgroup test, I can prove that the group is closed under taking inverses but I do not understand how to show that it is closed under the binary operation
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
Let's suppose $(p_1,q_1)$ and $(p_2,q_2)$ are elements in $Ptimes Q$. What is their product by definition?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
Let's suppose $(p_1,q_1)$ and $(p_2,q_2)$ are elements in $Ptimes Q$. What is their product by definition?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
(p1p2) and (q1,q2) ?
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
(p1p2) and (q1,q2) ?
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
The operation is multiplying in every coordinate. So it is $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$. Well, can you see why is it in $Ptimes Q$?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
The operation is multiplying in every coordinate. So it is $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$. Well, can you see why is it in $Ptimes Q$?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $P leq G$ and $Q le H$, we want to show that $P times Q le G times H$.
First, $P times Q = {(p,q) : p in P wedge q in Q }$, while $G times H = {(g,h) : g in G wedge h in H}$.
The product is defined by $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) = (p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$.
Let's check the group axoims:
G1: For all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$, $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$.
Since $P$ and $Q$ are groups, $p_1p_2 in P$ and $q_1q_2 in Q$, so $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2) in P times Q$.
G2: Associativity is inherited from $P$ and $Q$.
$[(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2)]cdot(p_3,q_3) = (p_1,q_1) cdot [(p_2,q_2)cdot(p_3,q_3)]$
because $(p_1p_2)p_3=p_1(p_2p_3)$ and $(q_1q_2)q_3 = q_1(q_2q_3)$
G3: The identity element is $(e_P,e_Q) in P times Q$,
where $e_P in P$ and $e_Q in Q$ are the identity elements of $P$ and $Q$.
G4: The inverse of $(p,q) in P times Q$ is $(p^{-1},q^{-1}) in P times Q$
where $p^{-1} in P$ is the inverse of $p in P$ and $q^{-1} in Q$ is the inverse of $q in Q$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The fastest way would be using the following fact:
Let $G$ be a group and let $H$ be a subset of $G$. Then $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ $iff$ $H$ is nonempty and $ab^{-1}in H$, for all $a,bin H$
In your case we have to show the following:
$Ptimes Q$ is nonempty
$(p_1,q_1)cdot (p_2,q_2)^{-1}in Ptimes Q$ for all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2)in Ptimes Q$
Firstly $P$ and $Q$ are subgroups themselves so they at least should have an identity element hence they are nonempty, whence their direct product is nonempty.
The second requirement follows from the fact that $P$ and $Q$ were subgroups themselves.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $P leq G$ and $Q le H$, we want to show that $P times Q le G times H$.
First, $P times Q = {(p,q) : p in P wedge q in Q }$, while $G times H = {(g,h) : g in G wedge h in H}$.
The product is defined by $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) = (p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$.
Let's check the group axoims:
G1: For all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$, $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$.
Since $P$ and $Q$ are groups, $p_1p_2 in P$ and $q_1q_2 in Q$, so $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2) in P times Q$.
G2: Associativity is inherited from $P$ and $Q$.
$[(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2)]cdot(p_3,q_3) = (p_1,q_1) cdot [(p_2,q_2)cdot(p_3,q_3)]$
because $(p_1p_2)p_3=p_1(p_2p_3)$ and $(q_1q_2)q_3 = q_1(q_2q_3)$
G3: The identity element is $(e_P,e_Q) in P times Q$,
where $e_P in P$ and $e_Q in Q$ are the identity elements of $P$ and $Q$.
G4: The inverse of $(p,q) in P times Q$ is $(p^{-1},q^{-1}) in P times Q$
where $p^{-1} in P$ is the inverse of $p in P$ and $q^{-1} in Q$ is the inverse of $q in Q$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $P leq G$ and $Q le H$, we want to show that $P times Q le G times H$.
First, $P times Q = {(p,q) : p in P wedge q in Q }$, while $G times H = {(g,h) : g in G wedge h in H}$.
The product is defined by $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) = (p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$.
Let's check the group axoims:
G1: For all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$, $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$.
Since $P$ and $Q$ are groups, $p_1p_2 in P$ and $q_1q_2 in Q$, so $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2) in P times Q$.
G2: Associativity is inherited from $P$ and $Q$.
$[(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2)]cdot(p_3,q_3) = (p_1,q_1) cdot [(p_2,q_2)cdot(p_3,q_3)]$
because $(p_1p_2)p_3=p_1(p_2p_3)$ and $(q_1q_2)q_3 = q_1(q_2q_3)$
G3: The identity element is $(e_P,e_Q) in P times Q$,
where $e_P in P$ and $e_Q in Q$ are the identity elements of $P$ and $Q$.
G4: The inverse of $(p,q) in P times Q$ is $(p^{-1},q^{-1}) in P times Q$
where $p^{-1} in P$ is the inverse of $p in P$ and $q^{-1} in Q$ is the inverse of $q in Q$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $P leq G$ and $Q le H$, we want to show that $P times Q le G times H$.
First, $P times Q = {(p,q) : p in P wedge q in Q }$, while $G times H = {(g,h) : g in G wedge h in H}$.
The product is defined by $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) = (p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$.
Let's check the group axoims:
G1: For all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$, $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$.
Since $P$ and $Q$ are groups, $p_1p_2 in P$ and $q_1q_2 in Q$, so $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2) in P times Q$.
G2: Associativity is inherited from $P$ and $Q$.
$[(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2)]cdot(p_3,q_3) = (p_1,q_1) cdot [(p_2,q_2)cdot(p_3,q_3)]$
because $(p_1p_2)p_3=p_1(p_2p_3)$ and $(q_1q_2)q_3 = q_1(q_2q_3)$
G3: The identity element is $(e_P,e_Q) in P times Q$,
where $e_P in P$ and $e_Q in Q$ are the identity elements of $P$ and $Q$.
G4: The inverse of $(p,q) in P times Q$ is $(p^{-1},q^{-1}) in P times Q$
where $p^{-1} in P$ is the inverse of $p in P$ and $q^{-1} in Q$ is the inverse of $q in Q$.
$endgroup$
If $P leq G$ and $Q le H$, we want to show that $P times Q le G times H$.
First, $P times Q = {(p,q) : p in P wedge q in Q }$, while $G times H = {(g,h) : g in G wedge h in H}$.
The product is defined by $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) = (p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$.
Let's check the group axoims:
G1: For all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$, $(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2) in P times Q$.
Since $P$ and $Q$ are groups, $p_1p_2 in P$ and $q_1q_2 in Q$, so $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2) in P times Q$.
G2: Associativity is inherited from $P$ and $Q$.
$[(p_1,q_1)cdot(p_2,q_2)]cdot(p_3,q_3) = (p_1,q_1) cdot [(p_2,q_2)cdot(p_3,q_3)]$
because $(p_1p_2)p_3=p_1(p_2p_3)$ and $(q_1q_2)q_3 = q_1(q_2q_3)$
G3: The identity element is $(e_P,e_Q) in P times Q$,
where $e_P in P$ and $e_Q in Q$ are the identity elements of $P$ and $Q$.
G4: The inverse of $(p,q) in P times Q$ is $(p^{-1},q^{-1}) in P times Q$
where $p^{-1} in P$ is the inverse of $p in P$ and $q^{-1} in Q$ is the inverse of $q in Q$.
answered yesterday
Fly by NightFly by Night
26k32978
26k32978
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The fastest way would be using the following fact:
Let $G$ be a group and let $H$ be a subset of $G$. Then $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ $iff$ $H$ is nonempty and $ab^{-1}in H$, for all $a,bin H$
In your case we have to show the following:
$Ptimes Q$ is nonempty
$(p_1,q_1)cdot (p_2,q_2)^{-1}in Ptimes Q$ for all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2)in Ptimes Q$
Firstly $P$ and $Q$ are subgroups themselves so they at least should have an identity element hence they are nonempty, whence their direct product is nonempty.
The second requirement follows from the fact that $P$ and $Q$ were subgroups themselves.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The fastest way would be using the following fact:
Let $G$ be a group and let $H$ be a subset of $G$. Then $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ $iff$ $H$ is nonempty and $ab^{-1}in H$, for all $a,bin H$
In your case we have to show the following:
$Ptimes Q$ is nonempty
$(p_1,q_1)cdot (p_2,q_2)^{-1}in Ptimes Q$ for all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2)in Ptimes Q$
Firstly $P$ and $Q$ are subgroups themselves so they at least should have an identity element hence they are nonempty, whence their direct product is nonempty.
The second requirement follows from the fact that $P$ and $Q$ were subgroups themselves.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The fastest way would be using the following fact:
Let $G$ be a group and let $H$ be a subset of $G$. Then $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ $iff$ $H$ is nonempty and $ab^{-1}in H$, for all $a,bin H$
In your case we have to show the following:
$Ptimes Q$ is nonempty
$(p_1,q_1)cdot (p_2,q_2)^{-1}in Ptimes Q$ for all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2)in Ptimes Q$
Firstly $P$ and $Q$ are subgroups themselves so they at least should have an identity element hence they are nonempty, whence their direct product is nonempty.
The second requirement follows from the fact that $P$ and $Q$ were subgroups themselves.
$endgroup$
The fastest way would be using the following fact:
Let $G$ be a group and let $H$ be a subset of $G$. Then $H$ is a subgroup of $G$ $iff$ $H$ is nonempty and $ab^{-1}in H$, for all $a,bin H$
In your case we have to show the following:
$Ptimes Q$ is nonempty
$(p_1,q_1)cdot (p_2,q_2)^{-1}in Ptimes Q$ for all $(p_1,q_1),(p_2,q_2)in Ptimes Q$
Firstly $P$ and $Q$ are subgroups themselves so they at least should have an identity element hence they are nonempty, whence their direct product is nonempty.
The second requirement follows from the fact that $P$ and $Q$ were subgroups themselves.
answered yesterday
Vinyl_cape_jawaVinyl_cape_jawa
3,32211333
3,32211333
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What did you try? Let's start from the beginning: do you know what is the definition of a subgroup?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
Using the Subgroup test, I can prove that the group is closed under taking inverses but I do not understand how to show that it is closed under the binary operation
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
Let's suppose $(p_1,q_1)$ and $(p_2,q_2)$ are elements in $Ptimes Q$. What is their product by definition?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday
$begingroup$
(p1p2) and (q1,q2) ?
$endgroup$
– George Hall
yesterday
$begingroup$
The operation is multiplying in every coordinate. So it is $(p_1p_2,q_1q_2)$. Well, can you see why is it in $Ptimes Q$?
$endgroup$
– Mark
yesterday