Stokes vectors and fractional polarisationElliptical polarisationFormula for 2 vectorsCross product (high...
gerund and noun applications
Describing a chess game in a novel
How to get the n-th line after a grepped one?
The average age of first marriage in Russia
Why is there so much iron?
How are passwords stolen from companies if they only store hashes?
Why didn't Héctor fade away after this character died in the movie Coco?
How to define limit operations in general topological spaces? Are nets able to do this?
My friend is being a hypocrite
Print a physical multiplication table
Worshiping one God at a time?
Pronounciation of the combination "st" in spanish accents
Is there a term for accumulated dirt on the outside of your hands and feet?
Do I need to consider instance restrictions when showing a language is in P?
What (if any) is the reason to buy in small local stores?
How does 取材で訪れた integrate into this sentence?
When to use snap-off blade knife and when to use trapezoid blade knife?
Is there a hypothetical scenario that would make Earth uninhabitable for humans, but not for (the majority of) other animals?
In what cases must I use 了 and in what cases not?
Knife as defense against stray dogs
Turning a hard to access nut?
Differential and Linear trail propagation in Noekeon
Could Sinn Fein swing any Brexit vote in Parliament?
Existence of a celestial body big enough for early civilization to be thought of as a second moon
Stokes vectors and fractional polarisation
Elliptical polarisationFormula for 2 vectorsCross product (high school level)Resultant from 40 N and 30 N vectorsExperimental volume rotation and change of basisVectors into Navier–Stokes equation for an incompressible fluidVectors and velocityvectors - normal and tangential vectorsHorizontal angular rotation speedRutherford Scattering - Annular Detector in the Far Field
$begingroup$
I am struggling to be able to write this problem as a Stokes vector. I understand how to set it up, but am not sure if you need two separate vectors that you combine or just one. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
The scenario is one where there is a light source scattering off two dust clouds in a nearby galaxy so that the light is fully linearly polarized in the horizontal plane for one cloud and the vertical plane for the other cloud. The first cloud, 1 say, has PA=0° and cloud 2 corresponds to PA=90°. These are combined by a telescope to form one bright spot in an image. How would you write down a Stokes vector to represent the polarization state of the combined light if the scattered light from cloud 1 and 2 have intensities of 5 pW/m2 and 1 pW/m2 respectively?
I have tried this by creating a Stokes vector each (with Q +ve being horizontal) and by creating a Stokes vector for each cloud and then multiplying them, but am not sure this is the correct way to go about solving it. How would I find the fractional polarisation of the combined light when I have the Stokes vector?
vectors physics
New contributor
Cosmocomputer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am struggling to be able to write this problem as a Stokes vector. I understand how to set it up, but am not sure if you need two separate vectors that you combine or just one. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
The scenario is one where there is a light source scattering off two dust clouds in a nearby galaxy so that the light is fully linearly polarized in the horizontal plane for one cloud and the vertical plane for the other cloud. The first cloud, 1 say, has PA=0° and cloud 2 corresponds to PA=90°. These are combined by a telescope to form one bright spot in an image. How would you write down a Stokes vector to represent the polarization state of the combined light if the scattered light from cloud 1 and 2 have intensities of 5 pW/m2 and 1 pW/m2 respectively?
I have tried this by creating a Stokes vector each (with Q +ve being horizontal) and by creating a Stokes vector for each cloud and then multiplying them, but am not sure this is the correct way to go about solving it. How would I find the fractional polarisation of the combined light when I have the Stokes vector?
vectors physics
New contributor
Cosmocomputer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am struggling to be able to write this problem as a Stokes vector. I understand how to set it up, but am not sure if you need two separate vectors that you combine or just one. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
The scenario is one where there is a light source scattering off two dust clouds in a nearby galaxy so that the light is fully linearly polarized in the horizontal plane for one cloud and the vertical plane for the other cloud. The first cloud, 1 say, has PA=0° and cloud 2 corresponds to PA=90°. These are combined by a telescope to form one bright spot in an image. How would you write down a Stokes vector to represent the polarization state of the combined light if the scattered light from cloud 1 and 2 have intensities of 5 pW/m2 and 1 pW/m2 respectively?
I have tried this by creating a Stokes vector each (with Q +ve being horizontal) and by creating a Stokes vector for each cloud and then multiplying them, but am not sure this is the correct way to go about solving it. How would I find the fractional polarisation of the combined light when I have the Stokes vector?
vectors physics
New contributor
Cosmocomputer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I am struggling to be able to write this problem as a Stokes vector. I understand how to set it up, but am not sure if you need two separate vectors that you combine or just one. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
The scenario is one where there is a light source scattering off two dust clouds in a nearby galaxy so that the light is fully linearly polarized in the horizontal plane for one cloud and the vertical plane for the other cloud. The first cloud, 1 say, has PA=0° and cloud 2 corresponds to PA=90°. These are combined by a telescope to form one bright spot in an image. How would you write down a Stokes vector to represent the polarization state of the combined light if the scattered light from cloud 1 and 2 have intensities of 5 pW/m2 and 1 pW/m2 respectively?
I have tried this by creating a Stokes vector each (with Q +ve being horizontal) and by creating a Stokes vector for each cloud and then multiplying them, but am not sure this is the correct way to go about solving it. How would I find the fractional polarisation of the combined light when I have the Stokes vector?
vectors physics
vectors physics
New contributor
Cosmocomputer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Cosmocomputer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Mar 11 at 19:03
J. W. Tanner
3,3351320
3,3351320
New contributor
Cosmocomputer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Mar 11 at 18:52
CosmocomputerCosmocomputer
1
1
New contributor
Cosmocomputer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Cosmocomputer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Cosmocomputer is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Cosmocomputer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144070%2fstokes-vectors-and-fractional-polarisation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Cosmocomputer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Cosmocomputer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Cosmocomputer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Cosmocomputer is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144070%2fstokes-vectors-and-fractional-polarisation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown