Deriving the solutions of a system of linear equations Announcing the arrival of Valued...

How does light 'choose' between wave and particle behaviour?

What is the meaning of 'breadth' in breadth first search?

How long can equipment go unused before powering up runs the risk of damage?

What do you call the main part of a joke?

Antipodal Land Area Calculation

How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?

How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?

Putting class ranking in CV, but against dept guidelines

The Nth Gryphon Number

Flash light on something

Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?

How can I prevent/balance waiting and turtling as a response to cooldown mechanics

Project Euler #1 in C++

Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?

What makes a man succeed?

How many morphisms from 1 to 1+1 can there be?

The test team as an enemy of development? And how can this be avoided?

How would a mousetrap for use in space work?

How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?

1-probability to calculate two events in a row

Tannaka duality for semisimple groups

Strange behavior of Object.defineProperty() in JavaScript

What are the discoveries that have been possible with the rejection of positivism?

Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?



Deriving the solutions of a system of linear equations



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)How to solve the six elements equations below?Solving nonlinear systemLeast squares fit for an underdetermined linear systemDoes this linear system have a single solutionFinding a solution to system of bilinear equationsHow to prove independence of system of quadratic equationsHow this Linear Equations Got that solution with this form?Solutions For System Of EquationsFinding a solution to a linear system with more unknowns than equations subject (in R)Solving a linear system of equations in 3 unknowns












1












$begingroup$


Let $Kin mathbb{N}$ with $Kgeq 2$ and consider the system of equations
$$
begin{cases}
sum_{j=1}^h y_j *x_{K+j-h}=sum_{j=1}^h x_j *y_{K+j-h} & text{ for }h=1,...,K-1\
sum_{j=1}^Ky_j=1\
end{cases}
$$

that is
$$
begin{cases}
y_1*x_K=x_1*y_K\
y_1*x_{K-1}+y_2*x_K=x_1*y_{K-1}+x_2*y_K\
y_1*x_{K-2}+y_2*x_{K-1}+y_3*x_K=x_1*y_{K-2}+x_2*y_{K-1}+x_3*y_K\
...\
y_1*x_2+y_2*x_3+...+y_{K-1}*x_K=x_1*y_2+x_2*y_3+...+x_{K-1}*y_K\
y_1+y_2+...+y_K=1\
end{cases}
$$



For example, when $K=3$, the system becomes
$$
begin{cases}
y_1*x_3=x_1*y_3\
y_1*x_2+y_2*x_3=x_1*y_2+x_2*y_3\
y_1+y_2+y_3=1\
end{cases}
$$

Note:




  • The unknowns of the system are $y_1,...,y_K$, while $x_1,...,x_K$ are treated as parameters.


  • I assume that $y_j>0,x_j>0$ for $j=1,...,K$.



  • We know that the parameters $x_1,...,x_K$ are such that $sum_{j=1}^K x_j=1$







Question: I want to show that the solutions of the system above are
$$
begin{cases}
(a) text{ }y_j=x_j & text{ for }j=1,...,K\
text{or }\
(b) text{ }y_j=y_{K+1-j} & text{ for }j=1,...,lfloorfrac{K+1}{2} rfloor
end{cases}
$$

where $lfloor A rfloor$ denotes the the largest integer less than or equal to $A$.





What I have tried (incomplete): I have the proof when $K=3$ (very simple).



$$
begin{cases}
y_1*x_3=x_1*y_3\
y_1*x_2+y_2*x_3=x_1*y_2+x_2*y_3\
y_1+y_2+y_3=1\
end{cases} Rightarrow begin{cases}
frac{x_3}{x_1}=frac{y_3}{y_1}\
frac{x_2}{x_1}+frac{y_2}{y_1}frac{x_3}{x_1}=frac{y_2}{y_1}+frac{y_3}{y_1}frac{x_2}{x_1}
end{cases}
$$

$$Rightarrow frac{x_2}{x_1}+frac{y_2}{y_1}frac{y_3}{y_1}=frac{y_2}{y_1}+frac{y_3}{y_1}frac{x_2}{x_1}Leftrightarrow Big( frac{y_2}{y_1}-frac{x_2}{x_1}Big)Big(frac{y_3}{y_1}-1 Big)=0
$$

$$
Leftrightarrow text{ }y_3=y_1 text{ or } frac{y_2}{y_1}=frac{x_2}{x_1}
$$



If $y_3=y_1$ then we are in case (b) of the general claim above.



If $ frac{y_2}{y_1}=frac{x_2}{x_1}$, then the system becomes
$$
begin{cases}
frac{y_3}{y_1}=frac{x_3}{x_1}\
frac{y_2}{y_1}=frac{x_2}{x_1}\
y_1+y_2+y_3=1\
end{cases} Rightarrow y_1+frac{x_2}{x_1}y_1+frac{x_3}{x_1}y_1=1
$$

$$
Leftrightarrow y_1(frac{overbrace{x_1+x_2+x_3}^{=1}}{x_1})=1 Leftrightarrow y_1=x_1 Rightarrow y_3=x_3, y_2=x_2
$$

that is case (a) of the general claim above. I am struggling to generalise this to any $K$ because I'm very weak in linear algebra. Any help from your side would be greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Why are you interested in this question?
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Mar 25 at 17:31










  • $begingroup$
    It is part of a proof I have to develop.
    $endgroup$
    – STF
    Mar 25 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    (b) is not a solution to your system, but just a symmetry that your system exhibits. If you know half the $y$ values, it will tell you the other half, but it doesn't tell you that first half.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 4:21










  • $begingroup$
    You can show easily that $y_i = x_i$ for all $i$ is a solution. If you can prove that your $K$ equations in the $K$ unknowns are all independent (none is a linear combination of the others), then it is the only solution, so you are done.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 4:30
















1












$begingroup$


Let $Kin mathbb{N}$ with $Kgeq 2$ and consider the system of equations
$$
begin{cases}
sum_{j=1}^h y_j *x_{K+j-h}=sum_{j=1}^h x_j *y_{K+j-h} & text{ for }h=1,...,K-1\
sum_{j=1}^Ky_j=1\
end{cases}
$$

that is
$$
begin{cases}
y_1*x_K=x_1*y_K\
y_1*x_{K-1}+y_2*x_K=x_1*y_{K-1}+x_2*y_K\
y_1*x_{K-2}+y_2*x_{K-1}+y_3*x_K=x_1*y_{K-2}+x_2*y_{K-1}+x_3*y_K\
...\
y_1*x_2+y_2*x_3+...+y_{K-1}*x_K=x_1*y_2+x_2*y_3+...+x_{K-1}*y_K\
y_1+y_2+...+y_K=1\
end{cases}
$$



For example, when $K=3$, the system becomes
$$
begin{cases}
y_1*x_3=x_1*y_3\
y_1*x_2+y_2*x_3=x_1*y_2+x_2*y_3\
y_1+y_2+y_3=1\
end{cases}
$$

Note:




  • The unknowns of the system are $y_1,...,y_K$, while $x_1,...,x_K$ are treated as parameters.


  • I assume that $y_j>0,x_j>0$ for $j=1,...,K$.



  • We know that the parameters $x_1,...,x_K$ are such that $sum_{j=1}^K x_j=1$







Question: I want to show that the solutions of the system above are
$$
begin{cases}
(a) text{ }y_j=x_j & text{ for }j=1,...,K\
text{or }\
(b) text{ }y_j=y_{K+1-j} & text{ for }j=1,...,lfloorfrac{K+1}{2} rfloor
end{cases}
$$

where $lfloor A rfloor$ denotes the the largest integer less than or equal to $A$.





What I have tried (incomplete): I have the proof when $K=3$ (very simple).



$$
begin{cases}
y_1*x_3=x_1*y_3\
y_1*x_2+y_2*x_3=x_1*y_2+x_2*y_3\
y_1+y_2+y_3=1\
end{cases} Rightarrow begin{cases}
frac{x_3}{x_1}=frac{y_3}{y_1}\
frac{x_2}{x_1}+frac{y_2}{y_1}frac{x_3}{x_1}=frac{y_2}{y_1}+frac{y_3}{y_1}frac{x_2}{x_1}
end{cases}
$$

$$Rightarrow frac{x_2}{x_1}+frac{y_2}{y_1}frac{y_3}{y_1}=frac{y_2}{y_1}+frac{y_3}{y_1}frac{x_2}{x_1}Leftrightarrow Big( frac{y_2}{y_1}-frac{x_2}{x_1}Big)Big(frac{y_3}{y_1}-1 Big)=0
$$

$$
Leftrightarrow text{ }y_3=y_1 text{ or } frac{y_2}{y_1}=frac{x_2}{x_1}
$$



If $y_3=y_1$ then we are in case (b) of the general claim above.



If $ frac{y_2}{y_1}=frac{x_2}{x_1}$, then the system becomes
$$
begin{cases}
frac{y_3}{y_1}=frac{x_3}{x_1}\
frac{y_2}{y_1}=frac{x_2}{x_1}\
y_1+y_2+y_3=1\
end{cases} Rightarrow y_1+frac{x_2}{x_1}y_1+frac{x_3}{x_1}y_1=1
$$

$$
Leftrightarrow y_1(frac{overbrace{x_1+x_2+x_3}^{=1}}{x_1})=1 Leftrightarrow y_1=x_1 Rightarrow y_3=x_3, y_2=x_2
$$

that is case (a) of the general claim above. I am struggling to generalise this to any $K$ because I'm very weak in linear algebra. Any help from your side would be greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Why are you interested in this question?
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Mar 25 at 17:31










  • $begingroup$
    It is part of a proof I have to develop.
    $endgroup$
    – STF
    Mar 25 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    (b) is not a solution to your system, but just a symmetry that your system exhibits. If you know half the $y$ values, it will tell you the other half, but it doesn't tell you that first half.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 4:21










  • $begingroup$
    You can show easily that $y_i = x_i$ for all $i$ is a solution. If you can prove that your $K$ equations in the $K$ unknowns are all independent (none is a linear combination of the others), then it is the only solution, so you are done.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 4:30














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Let $Kin mathbb{N}$ with $Kgeq 2$ and consider the system of equations
$$
begin{cases}
sum_{j=1}^h y_j *x_{K+j-h}=sum_{j=1}^h x_j *y_{K+j-h} & text{ for }h=1,...,K-1\
sum_{j=1}^Ky_j=1\
end{cases}
$$

that is
$$
begin{cases}
y_1*x_K=x_1*y_K\
y_1*x_{K-1}+y_2*x_K=x_1*y_{K-1}+x_2*y_K\
y_1*x_{K-2}+y_2*x_{K-1}+y_3*x_K=x_1*y_{K-2}+x_2*y_{K-1}+x_3*y_K\
...\
y_1*x_2+y_2*x_3+...+y_{K-1}*x_K=x_1*y_2+x_2*y_3+...+x_{K-1}*y_K\
y_1+y_2+...+y_K=1\
end{cases}
$$



For example, when $K=3$, the system becomes
$$
begin{cases}
y_1*x_3=x_1*y_3\
y_1*x_2+y_2*x_3=x_1*y_2+x_2*y_3\
y_1+y_2+y_3=1\
end{cases}
$$

Note:




  • The unknowns of the system are $y_1,...,y_K$, while $x_1,...,x_K$ are treated as parameters.


  • I assume that $y_j>0,x_j>0$ for $j=1,...,K$.



  • We know that the parameters $x_1,...,x_K$ are such that $sum_{j=1}^K x_j=1$







Question: I want to show that the solutions of the system above are
$$
begin{cases}
(a) text{ }y_j=x_j & text{ for }j=1,...,K\
text{or }\
(b) text{ }y_j=y_{K+1-j} & text{ for }j=1,...,lfloorfrac{K+1}{2} rfloor
end{cases}
$$

where $lfloor A rfloor$ denotes the the largest integer less than or equal to $A$.





What I have tried (incomplete): I have the proof when $K=3$ (very simple).



$$
begin{cases}
y_1*x_3=x_1*y_3\
y_1*x_2+y_2*x_3=x_1*y_2+x_2*y_3\
y_1+y_2+y_3=1\
end{cases} Rightarrow begin{cases}
frac{x_3}{x_1}=frac{y_3}{y_1}\
frac{x_2}{x_1}+frac{y_2}{y_1}frac{x_3}{x_1}=frac{y_2}{y_1}+frac{y_3}{y_1}frac{x_2}{x_1}
end{cases}
$$

$$Rightarrow frac{x_2}{x_1}+frac{y_2}{y_1}frac{y_3}{y_1}=frac{y_2}{y_1}+frac{y_3}{y_1}frac{x_2}{x_1}Leftrightarrow Big( frac{y_2}{y_1}-frac{x_2}{x_1}Big)Big(frac{y_3}{y_1}-1 Big)=0
$$

$$
Leftrightarrow text{ }y_3=y_1 text{ or } frac{y_2}{y_1}=frac{x_2}{x_1}
$$



If $y_3=y_1$ then we are in case (b) of the general claim above.



If $ frac{y_2}{y_1}=frac{x_2}{x_1}$, then the system becomes
$$
begin{cases}
frac{y_3}{y_1}=frac{x_3}{x_1}\
frac{y_2}{y_1}=frac{x_2}{x_1}\
y_1+y_2+y_3=1\
end{cases} Rightarrow y_1+frac{x_2}{x_1}y_1+frac{x_3}{x_1}y_1=1
$$

$$
Leftrightarrow y_1(frac{overbrace{x_1+x_2+x_3}^{=1}}{x_1})=1 Leftrightarrow y_1=x_1 Rightarrow y_3=x_3, y_2=x_2
$$

that is case (a) of the general claim above. I am struggling to generalise this to any $K$ because I'm very weak in linear algebra. Any help from your side would be greatly appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $Kin mathbb{N}$ with $Kgeq 2$ and consider the system of equations
$$
begin{cases}
sum_{j=1}^h y_j *x_{K+j-h}=sum_{j=1}^h x_j *y_{K+j-h} & text{ for }h=1,...,K-1\
sum_{j=1}^Ky_j=1\
end{cases}
$$

that is
$$
begin{cases}
y_1*x_K=x_1*y_K\
y_1*x_{K-1}+y_2*x_K=x_1*y_{K-1}+x_2*y_K\
y_1*x_{K-2}+y_2*x_{K-1}+y_3*x_K=x_1*y_{K-2}+x_2*y_{K-1}+x_3*y_K\
...\
y_1*x_2+y_2*x_3+...+y_{K-1}*x_K=x_1*y_2+x_2*y_3+...+x_{K-1}*y_K\
y_1+y_2+...+y_K=1\
end{cases}
$$



For example, when $K=3$, the system becomes
$$
begin{cases}
y_1*x_3=x_1*y_3\
y_1*x_2+y_2*x_3=x_1*y_2+x_2*y_3\
y_1+y_2+y_3=1\
end{cases}
$$

Note:




  • The unknowns of the system are $y_1,...,y_K$, while $x_1,...,x_K$ are treated as parameters.


  • I assume that $y_j>0,x_j>0$ for $j=1,...,K$.



  • We know that the parameters $x_1,...,x_K$ are such that $sum_{j=1}^K x_j=1$







Question: I want to show that the solutions of the system above are
$$
begin{cases}
(a) text{ }y_j=x_j & text{ for }j=1,...,K\
text{or }\
(b) text{ }y_j=y_{K+1-j} & text{ for }j=1,...,lfloorfrac{K+1}{2} rfloor
end{cases}
$$

where $lfloor A rfloor$ denotes the the largest integer less than or equal to $A$.





What I have tried (incomplete): I have the proof when $K=3$ (very simple).



$$
begin{cases}
y_1*x_3=x_1*y_3\
y_1*x_2+y_2*x_3=x_1*y_2+x_2*y_3\
y_1+y_2+y_3=1\
end{cases} Rightarrow begin{cases}
frac{x_3}{x_1}=frac{y_3}{y_1}\
frac{x_2}{x_1}+frac{y_2}{y_1}frac{x_3}{x_1}=frac{y_2}{y_1}+frac{y_3}{y_1}frac{x_2}{x_1}
end{cases}
$$

$$Rightarrow frac{x_2}{x_1}+frac{y_2}{y_1}frac{y_3}{y_1}=frac{y_2}{y_1}+frac{y_3}{y_1}frac{x_2}{x_1}Leftrightarrow Big( frac{y_2}{y_1}-frac{x_2}{x_1}Big)Big(frac{y_3}{y_1}-1 Big)=0
$$

$$
Leftrightarrow text{ }y_3=y_1 text{ or } frac{y_2}{y_1}=frac{x_2}{x_1}
$$



If $y_3=y_1$ then we are in case (b) of the general claim above.



If $ frac{y_2}{y_1}=frac{x_2}{x_1}$, then the system becomes
$$
begin{cases}
frac{y_3}{y_1}=frac{x_3}{x_1}\
frac{y_2}{y_1}=frac{x_2}{x_1}\
y_1+y_2+y_3=1\
end{cases} Rightarrow y_1+frac{x_2}{x_1}y_1+frac{x_3}{x_1}y_1=1
$$

$$
Leftrightarrow y_1(frac{overbrace{x_1+x_2+x_3}^{=1}}{x_1})=1 Leftrightarrow y_1=x_1 Rightarrow y_3=x_3, y_2=x_2
$$

that is case (a) of the general claim above. I am struggling to generalise this to any $K$ because I'm very weak in linear algebra. Any help from your side would be greatly appreciated.







linear-algebra systems-of-equations linear-programming






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 25 at 17:08









STFSTF

671422




671422












  • $begingroup$
    Why are you interested in this question?
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Mar 25 at 17:31










  • $begingroup$
    It is part of a proof I have to develop.
    $endgroup$
    – STF
    Mar 25 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    (b) is not a solution to your system, but just a symmetry that your system exhibits. If you know half the $y$ values, it will tell you the other half, but it doesn't tell you that first half.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 4:21










  • $begingroup$
    You can show easily that $y_i = x_i$ for all $i$ is a solution. If you can prove that your $K$ equations in the $K$ unknowns are all independent (none is a linear combination of the others), then it is the only solution, so you are done.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 4:30


















  • $begingroup$
    Why are you interested in this question?
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Mar 25 at 17:31










  • $begingroup$
    It is part of a proof I have to develop.
    $endgroup$
    – STF
    Mar 25 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    (b) is not a solution to your system, but just a symmetry that your system exhibits. If you know half the $y$ values, it will tell you the other half, but it doesn't tell you that first half.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 4:21










  • $begingroup$
    You can show easily that $y_i = x_i$ for all $i$ is a solution. If you can prove that your $K$ equations in the $K$ unknowns are all independent (none is a linear combination of the others), then it is the only solution, so you are done.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 4:30
















$begingroup$
Why are you interested in this question?
$endgroup$
– James
Mar 25 at 17:31




$begingroup$
Why are you interested in this question?
$endgroup$
– James
Mar 25 at 17:31












$begingroup$
It is part of a proof I have to develop.
$endgroup$
– STF
Mar 25 at 18:21




$begingroup$
It is part of a proof I have to develop.
$endgroup$
– STF
Mar 25 at 18:21












$begingroup$
(b) is not a solution to your system, but just a symmetry that your system exhibits. If you know half the $y$ values, it will tell you the other half, but it doesn't tell you that first half.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 26 at 4:21




$begingroup$
(b) is not a solution to your system, but just a symmetry that your system exhibits. If you know half the $y$ values, it will tell you the other half, but it doesn't tell you that first half.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 26 at 4:21












$begingroup$
You can show easily that $y_i = x_i$ for all $i$ is a solution. If you can prove that your $K$ equations in the $K$ unknowns are all independent (none is a linear combination of the others), then it is the only solution, so you are done.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 26 at 4:30




$begingroup$
You can show easily that $y_i = x_i$ for all $i$ is a solution. If you can prove that your $K$ equations in the $K$ unknowns are all independent (none is a linear combination of the others), then it is the only solution, so you are done.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 26 at 4:30










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3162070%2fderiving-the-solutions-of-a-system-of-linear-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3162070%2fderiving-the-solutions-of-a-system-of-linear-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Nidaros erkebispedøme

Birsay

Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...