Proving the dimension of a manifold is well defined Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate...

Google .dev domain strangely redirects to https

Random body shuffle every night—can we still function?

How to write capital alpha?

Why is it faster to reheat something than it is to cook it?

1-probability to calculate two events in a row

Why does it sometimes sound good to play a grace note as a lead in to a note in a melody?

Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?

If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what is "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications"?

What to do with repeated rejections for phd position

Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube

A term for a woman complaining about things/begging in a cute/childish way

Drawing spherical mirrors

An adverb for when you're not exaggerating

What initially awakened the Balrog?

Would it be easier to apply for a UK visa if there is a host family to sponsor for you in going there?

One-one communication

macOS: Name for app shortcut screen found by pinching with thumb and three fingers

How can I prevent/balance waiting and turtling as a response to cooldown mechanics

How can I set the aperture on my DSLR when it's attached to a telescope instead of a lens?

Dyck paths with extra diagonals from valleys (Laser construction)

Tannaka duality for semisimple groups

Why can't I install Tomboy in Ubuntu Mate 19.04?

Lagrange four-squares theorem --- deterministic complexity

Maximum summed subsequences with non-adjacent items



Proving the dimension of a manifold is well defined



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Show that points on a smooth manifold can be separated by smooth functionShowing a function is a manifoldExtending a smooth vector field on a manifoldProving diffeomorphism invariance of boundaryThe definition of smooth maps given in Introduction to Smooth manifolds by John M. LeeInequality about dimensions of submanifoldsK-Manifold Definitions And The Dimension Of A SphereDefinition of manifolds as submanifolds of $mathbb{R}^m$existence of a non-negative smooth function on a neighborhood of point on a boundary of a smooth manifold.Uniqueness of the dimension of a manifold












1












$begingroup$


Show that if $M subseteq Bbb R^n$ is a $k$-dimensional manifold, then there is no $x in M$ and $U_x$ a neighborhood of $x$ such that $M cap U_x$ has a good parametrization from $V_x subseteq Bbb R^m$ where $k neq m$.



The definition of "good parametrization" of $M$ is as follows: there exists a smooth, regular homeomorphism $r:V_x to Bbb R^n $ such that $r(V_x) =M$ where $V_x subseteq Bbb R^m$ is an open set.



I'm having a hard time approaching this one, any guidance will be appreciated










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If you have charts $phi: U to Bbb R^n$ and $psi : U to Bbb R^m$, then $psi^{-1}circ phi$ is a homeomorphism between open sets of $Bbb R^n$ and $Bbb R^m$. So you just need to prove it for open sets in $Bbb R^n$ and $Bbb R^m$ for it to be true for all manifolds.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 4:17
















1












$begingroup$


Show that if $M subseteq Bbb R^n$ is a $k$-dimensional manifold, then there is no $x in M$ and $U_x$ a neighborhood of $x$ such that $M cap U_x$ has a good parametrization from $V_x subseteq Bbb R^m$ where $k neq m$.



The definition of "good parametrization" of $M$ is as follows: there exists a smooth, regular homeomorphism $r:V_x to Bbb R^n $ such that $r(V_x) =M$ where $V_x subseteq Bbb R^m$ is an open set.



I'm having a hard time approaching this one, any guidance will be appreciated










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If you have charts $phi: U to Bbb R^n$ and $psi : U to Bbb R^m$, then $psi^{-1}circ phi$ is a homeomorphism between open sets of $Bbb R^n$ and $Bbb R^m$. So you just need to prove it for open sets in $Bbb R^n$ and $Bbb R^m$ for it to be true for all manifolds.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 4:17














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Show that if $M subseteq Bbb R^n$ is a $k$-dimensional manifold, then there is no $x in M$ and $U_x$ a neighborhood of $x$ such that $M cap U_x$ has a good parametrization from $V_x subseteq Bbb R^m$ where $k neq m$.



The definition of "good parametrization" of $M$ is as follows: there exists a smooth, regular homeomorphism $r:V_x to Bbb R^n $ such that $r(V_x) =M$ where $V_x subseteq Bbb R^m$ is an open set.



I'm having a hard time approaching this one, any guidance will be appreciated










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Show that if $M subseteq Bbb R^n$ is a $k$-dimensional manifold, then there is no $x in M$ and $U_x$ a neighborhood of $x$ such that $M cap U_x$ has a good parametrization from $V_x subseteq Bbb R^m$ where $k neq m$.



The definition of "good parametrization" of $M$ is as follows: there exists a smooth, regular homeomorphism $r:V_x to Bbb R^n $ such that $r(V_x) =M$ where $V_x subseteq Bbb R^m$ is an open set.



I'm having a hard time approaching this one, any guidance will be appreciated







calculus smooth-manifolds parametrization






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 25 at 17:17









user401516user401516

1,053311




1,053311












  • $begingroup$
    If you have charts $phi: U to Bbb R^n$ and $psi : U to Bbb R^m$, then $psi^{-1}circ phi$ is a homeomorphism between open sets of $Bbb R^n$ and $Bbb R^m$. So you just need to prove it for open sets in $Bbb R^n$ and $Bbb R^m$ for it to be true for all manifolds.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 4:17


















  • $begingroup$
    If you have charts $phi: U to Bbb R^n$ and $psi : U to Bbb R^m$, then $psi^{-1}circ phi$ is a homeomorphism between open sets of $Bbb R^n$ and $Bbb R^m$. So you just need to prove it for open sets in $Bbb R^n$ and $Bbb R^m$ for it to be true for all manifolds.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 4:17
















$begingroup$
If you have charts $phi: U to Bbb R^n$ and $psi : U to Bbb R^m$, then $psi^{-1}circ phi$ is a homeomorphism between open sets of $Bbb R^n$ and $Bbb R^m$. So you just need to prove it for open sets in $Bbb R^n$ and $Bbb R^m$ for it to be true for all manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 26 at 4:17




$begingroup$
If you have charts $phi: U to Bbb R^n$ and $psi : U to Bbb R^m$, then $psi^{-1}circ phi$ is a homeomorphism between open sets of $Bbb R^n$ and $Bbb R^m$. So you just need to prove it for open sets in $Bbb R^n$ and $Bbb R^m$ for it to be true for all manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 26 at 4:17










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

If locally arround $xin M$ we have two good parametrizations $phi$, $psi$ which are defined on open subsets of $mathbb R^k$ and $mathbb R^l$ respectively then after a restriction we get a homemorphism $tau=psi^{-1}circphi$ between open subsets of $mathbb R^k$ and $mathbb R^l$. Now one can use tools from algebraic topology to show that this imlpies $k=l$. However since we are in the differentiable setting we can also show this more directly:



Assume for a moment that we knew that $tau$ is in fact a diffeomorphism. Then by the chain rule for all $x$ in the domain of $tau$ we have



$$id_{mathbb R^k}=D(id)(x)=D(tau^{-1}circtau)(x)=D(tau^{-1})(tau (x))cdot D(tau)(x)$$
and in the same way



$$id_{mathbb R^n}=D(id)(tau (x))=D(taucirctau^{-1})(tau(x))=D(tau)( x)cdot D(tau^{-1})(tau (x))$$



so $D(tau)(x)$ is a linear isomorphism between $mathbb R^k$ and $mathbb R^l$ which implies $k=l$.



So it remains to show that $tau$ is a diffeomorphism. For this we can use the following lemma which is also of general interest:




$textbf{Lemma:}$

Assume $psi:Omega tomathbb R^n$ is a regular smooth map defined on an open subset of $mathbb R^k$. Then for all $xin Omega$ there are open neighbourhoods $Omega'$, $U$ of $x$, $psi(x)$ respectively and a smooth map $Gamma:UtoOmega'$ such that $psi_{|Omega'}$ is a homeomorphism onto it's image and $psi^{-1}_{|Omega'}=Gamma$ on $psi(Omega')cap U$.




So if $z$ is in the domain of $tau$ we can set $x=tau(z)$, find $Omega'$, $U$ and $Gamma$ as above and then $tau=Gammacircphi$ on $tau^{-1}(Omega')$ which is smooth. In the same way $tau^{-1}$ will then be smooth.



$textbf{proof of the Lemma:}$



Set $W=$im$(Dpsi(x))=Dpsi(x)(mathbb R^k)$ which is a $k$-dimensional subspace of $mathbb R^n$ and let $L:mathbb R^ntomathbb R^k$ be a linear map which maps $W$ onto $mathbb R^k$. Then by the chain rule



$$D(Lcircpsi)(x)=DL(psi(x))circ Dpsi(x)=Lcirc Dpsi(x)$$



is surjective and hence invertible. By the inverse function theorem there are open neigbhourhoods $Omega'subseteqOmega$, $Vsubseteqmathbb R^k$ of $x$ and $L(psi(x))$ such that $Lcircpsi:Omega'to V$ is a diffemorphism.



Now set $U=L^{-1}(V)$ and $Gamma=(Lcircpsi)^{-1}circ L$ which is defined on $U$. Then $Gamma$ is smooth and for all $yinpsi(Omega')cap U$ we have $Gamma(y)=Gamma(psi(psi^{-1}(y)))=psi^{-1}(y)$. Finally as $L$ is injective on $psi(Omega')$ for all $Wsubseteq Omega'$ open $psi(W)=L^{-1}(L(psi(W)))cap psi(Omega')$ which is an open subset of $psi(Omega')$ so $psi_{|Omega'}$ is a homeomorphism onto its image. $square$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3162083%2fproving-the-dimension-of-a-manifold-is-well-defined%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    If locally arround $xin M$ we have two good parametrizations $phi$, $psi$ which are defined on open subsets of $mathbb R^k$ and $mathbb R^l$ respectively then after a restriction we get a homemorphism $tau=psi^{-1}circphi$ between open subsets of $mathbb R^k$ and $mathbb R^l$. Now one can use tools from algebraic topology to show that this imlpies $k=l$. However since we are in the differentiable setting we can also show this more directly:



    Assume for a moment that we knew that $tau$ is in fact a diffeomorphism. Then by the chain rule for all $x$ in the domain of $tau$ we have



    $$id_{mathbb R^k}=D(id)(x)=D(tau^{-1}circtau)(x)=D(tau^{-1})(tau (x))cdot D(tau)(x)$$
    and in the same way



    $$id_{mathbb R^n}=D(id)(tau (x))=D(taucirctau^{-1})(tau(x))=D(tau)( x)cdot D(tau^{-1})(tau (x))$$



    so $D(tau)(x)$ is a linear isomorphism between $mathbb R^k$ and $mathbb R^l$ which implies $k=l$.



    So it remains to show that $tau$ is a diffeomorphism. For this we can use the following lemma which is also of general interest:




    $textbf{Lemma:}$

    Assume $psi:Omega tomathbb R^n$ is a regular smooth map defined on an open subset of $mathbb R^k$. Then for all $xin Omega$ there are open neighbourhoods $Omega'$, $U$ of $x$, $psi(x)$ respectively and a smooth map $Gamma:UtoOmega'$ such that $psi_{|Omega'}$ is a homeomorphism onto it's image and $psi^{-1}_{|Omega'}=Gamma$ on $psi(Omega')cap U$.




    So if $z$ is in the domain of $tau$ we can set $x=tau(z)$, find $Omega'$, $U$ and $Gamma$ as above and then $tau=Gammacircphi$ on $tau^{-1}(Omega')$ which is smooth. In the same way $tau^{-1}$ will then be smooth.



    $textbf{proof of the Lemma:}$



    Set $W=$im$(Dpsi(x))=Dpsi(x)(mathbb R^k)$ which is a $k$-dimensional subspace of $mathbb R^n$ and let $L:mathbb R^ntomathbb R^k$ be a linear map which maps $W$ onto $mathbb R^k$. Then by the chain rule



    $$D(Lcircpsi)(x)=DL(psi(x))circ Dpsi(x)=Lcirc Dpsi(x)$$



    is surjective and hence invertible. By the inverse function theorem there are open neigbhourhoods $Omega'subseteqOmega$, $Vsubseteqmathbb R^k$ of $x$ and $L(psi(x))$ such that $Lcircpsi:Omega'to V$ is a diffemorphism.



    Now set $U=L^{-1}(V)$ and $Gamma=(Lcircpsi)^{-1}circ L$ which is defined on $U$. Then $Gamma$ is smooth and for all $yinpsi(Omega')cap U$ we have $Gamma(y)=Gamma(psi(psi^{-1}(y)))=psi^{-1}(y)$. Finally as $L$ is injective on $psi(Omega')$ for all $Wsubseteq Omega'$ open $psi(W)=L^{-1}(L(psi(W)))cap psi(Omega')$ which is an open subset of $psi(Omega')$ so $psi_{|Omega'}$ is a homeomorphism onto its image. $square$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      If locally arround $xin M$ we have two good parametrizations $phi$, $psi$ which are defined on open subsets of $mathbb R^k$ and $mathbb R^l$ respectively then after a restriction we get a homemorphism $tau=psi^{-1}circphi$ between open subsets of $mathbb R^k$ and $mathbb R^l$. Now one can use tools from algebraic topology to show that this imlpies $k=l$. However since we are in the differentiable setting we can also show this more directly:



      Assume for a moment that we knew that $tau$ is in fact a diffeomorphism. Then by the chain rule for all $x$ in the domain of $tau$ we have



      $$id_{mathbb R^k}=D(id)(x)=D(tau^{-1}circtau)(x)=D(tau^{-1})(tau (x))cdot D(tau)(x)$$
      and in the same way



      $$id_{mathbb R^n}=D(id)(tau (x))=D(taucirctau^{-1})(tau(x))=D(tau)( x)cdot D(tau^{-1})(tau (x))$$



      so $D(tau)(x)$ is a linear isomorphism between $mathbb R^k$ and $mathbb R^l$ which implies $k=l$.



      So it remains to show that $tau$ is a diffeomorphism. For this we can use the following lemma which is also of general interest:




      $textbf{Lemma:}$

      Assume $psi:Omega tomathbb R^n$ is a regular smooth map defined on an open subset of $mathbb R^k$. Then for all $xin Omega$ there are open neighbourhoods $Omega'$, $U$ of $x$, $psi(x)$ respectively and a smooth map $Gamma:UtoOmega'$ such that $psi_{|Omega'}$ is a homeomorphism onto it's image and $psi^{-1}_{|Omega'}=Gamma$ on $psi(Omega')cap U$.




      So if $z$ is in the domain of $tau$ we can set $x=tau(z)$, find $Omega'$, $U$ and $Gamma$ as above and then $tau=Gammacircphi$ on $tau^{-1}(Omega')$ which is smooth. In the same way $tau^{-1}$ will then be smooth.



      $textbf{proof of the Lemma:}$



      Set $W=$im$(Dpsi(x))=Dpsi(x)(mathbb R^k)$ which is a $k$-dimensional subspace of $mathbb R^n$ and let $L:mathbb R^ntomathbb R^k$ be a linear map which maps $W$ onto $mathbb R^k$. Then by the chain rule



      $$D(Lcircpsi)(x)=DL(psi(x))circ Dpsi(x)=Lcirc Dpsi(x)$$



      is surjective and hence invertible. By the inverse function theorem there are open neigbhourhoods $Omega'subseteqOmega$, $Vsubseteqmathbb R^k$ of $x$ and $L(psi(x))$ such that $Lcircpsi:Omega'to V$ is a diffemorphism.



      Now set $U=L^{-1}(V)$ and $Gamma=(Lcircpsi)^{-1}circ L$ which is defined on $U$. Then $Gamma$ is smooth and for all $yinpsi(Omega')cap U$ we have $Gamma(y)=Gamma(psi(psi^{-1}(y)))=psi^{-1}(y)$. Finally as $L$ is injective on $psi(Omega')$ for all $Wsubseteq Omega'$ open $psi(W)=L^{-1}(L(psi(W)))cap psi(Omega')$ which is an open subset of $psi(Omega')$ so $psi_{|Omega'}$ is a homeomorphism onto its image. $square$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        If locally arround $xin M$ we have two good parametrizations $phi$, $psi$ which are defined on open subsets of $mathbb R^k$ and $mathbb R^l$ respectively then after a restriction we get a homemorphism $tau=psi^{-1}circphi$ between open subsets of $mathbb R^k$ and $mathbb R^l$. Now one can use tools from algebraic topology to show that this imlpies $k=l$. However since we are in the differentiable setting we can also show this more directly:



        Assume for a moment that we knew that $tau$ is in fact a diffeomorphism. Then by the chain rule for all $x$ in the domain of $tau$ we have



        $$id_{mathbb R^k}=D(id)(x)=D(tau^{-1}circtau)(x)=D(tau^{-1})(tau (x))cdot D(tau)(x)$$
        and in the same way



        $$id_{mathbb R^n}=D(id)(tau (x))=D(taucirctau^{-1})(tau(x))=D(tau)( x)cdot D(tau^{-1})(tau (x))$$



        so $D(tau)(x)$ is a linear isomorphism between $mathbb R^k$ and $mathbb R^l$ which implies $k=l$.



        So it remains to show that $tau$ is a diffeomorphism. For this we can use the following lemma which is also of general interest:




        $textbf{Lemma:}$

        Assume $psi:Omega tomathbb R^n$ is a regular smooth map defined on an open subset of $mathbb R^k$. Then for all $xin Omega$ there are open neighbourhoods $Omega'$, $U$ of $x$, $psi(x)$ respectively and a smooth map $Gamma:UtoOmega'$ such that $psi_{|Omega'}$ is a homeomorphism onto it's image and $psi^{-1}_{|Omega'}=Gamma$ on $psi(Omega')cap U$.




        So if $z$ is in the domain of $tau$ we can set $x=tau(z)$, find $Omega'$, $U$ and $Gamma$ as above and then $tau=Gammacircphi$ on $tau^{-1}(Omega')$ which is smooth. In the same way $tau^{-1}$ will then be smooth.



        $textbf{proof of the Lemma:}$



        Set $W=$im$(Dpsi(x))=Dpsi(x)(mathbb R^k)$ which is a $k$-dimensional subspace of $mathbb R^n$ and let $L:mathbb R^ntomathbb R^k$ be a linear map which maps $W$ onto $mathbb R^k$. Then by the chain rule



        $$D(Lcircpsi)(x)=DL(psi(x))circ Dpsi(x)=Lcirc Dpsi(x)$$



        is surjective and hence invertible. By the inverse function theorem there are open neigbhourhoods $Omega'subseteqOmega$, $Vsubseteqmathbb R^k$ of $x$ and $L(psi(x))$ such that $Lcircpsi:Omega'to V$ is a diffemorphism.



        Now set $U=L^{-1}(V)$ and $Gamma=(Lcircpsi)^{-1}circ L$ which is defined on $U$. Then $Gamma$ is smooth and for all $yinpsi(Omega')cap U$ we have $Gamma(y)=Gamma(psi(psi^{-1}(y)))=psi^{-1}(y)$. Finally as $L$ is injective on $psi(Omega')$ for all $Wsubseteq Omega'$ open $psi(W)=L^{-1}(L(psi(W)))cap psi(Omega')$ which is an open subset of $psi(Omega')$ so $psi_{|Omega'}$ is a homeomorphism onto its image. $square$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        If locally arround $xin M$ we have two good parametrizations $phi$, $psi$ which are defined on open subsets of $mathbb R^k$ and $mathbb R^l$ respectively then after a restriction we get a homemorphism $tau=psi^{-1}circphi$ between open subsets of $mathbb R^k$ and $mathbb R^l$. Now one can use tools from algebraic topology to show that this imlpies $k=l$. However since we are in the differentiable setting we can also show this more directly:



        Assume for a moment that we knew that $tau$ is in fact a diffeomorphism. Then by the chain rule for all $x$ in the domain of $tau$ we have



        $$id_{mathbb R^k}=D(id)(x)=D(tau^{-1}circtau)(x)=D(tau^{-1})(tau (x))cdot D(tau)(x)$$
        and in the same way



        $$id_{mathbb R^n}=D(id)(tau (x))=D(taucirctau^{-1})(tau(x))=D(tau)( x)cdot D(tau^{-1})(tau (x))$$



        so $D(tau)(x)$ is a linear isomorphism between $mathbb R^k$ and $mathbb R^l$ which implies $k=l$.



        So it remains to show that $tau$ is a diffeomorphism. For this we can use the following lemma which is also of general interest:




        $textbf{Lemma:}$

        Assume $psi:Omega tomathbb R^n$ is a regular smooth map defined on an open subset of $mathbb R^k$. Then for all $xin Omega$ there are open neighbourhoods $Omega'$, $U$ of $x$, $psi(x)$ respectively and a smooth map $Gamma:UtoOmega'$ such that $psi_{|Omega'}$ is a homeomorphism onto it's image and $psi^{-1}_{|Omega'}=Gamma$ on $psi(Omega')cap U$.




        So if $z$ is in the domain of $tau$ we can set $x=tau(z)$, find $Omega'$, $U$ and $Gamma$ as above and then $tau=Gammacircphi$ on $tau^{-1}(Omega')$ which is smooth. In the same way $tau^{-1}$ will then be smooth.



        $textbf{proof of the Lemma:}$



        Set $W=$im$(Dpsi(x))=Dpsi(x)(mathbb R^k)$ which is a $k$-dimensional subspace of $mathbb R^n$ and let $L:mathbb R^ntomathbb R^k$ be a linear map which maps $W$ onto $mathbb R^k$. Then by the chain rule



        $$D(Lcircpsi)(x)=DL(psi(x))circ Dpsi(x)=Lcirc Dpsi(x)$$



        is surjective and hence invertible. By the inverse function theorem there are open neigbhourhoods $Omega'subseteqOmega$, $Vsubseteqmathbb R^k$ of $x$ and $L(psi(x))$ such that $Lcircpsi:Omega'to V$ is a diffemorphism.



        Now set $U=L^{-1}(V)$ and $Gamma=(Lcircpsi)^{-1}circ L$ which is defined on $U$. Then $Gamma$ is smooth and for all $yinpsi(Omega')cap U$ we have $Gamma(y)=Gamma(psi(psi^{-1}(y)))=psi^{-1}(y)$. Finally as $L$ is injective on $psi(Omega')$ for all $Wsubseteq Omega'$ open $psi(W)=L^{-1}(L(psi(W)))cap psi(Omega')$ which is an open subset of $psi(Omega')$ so $psi_{|Omega'}$ is a homeomorphism onto its image. $square$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Mar 26 at 23:56

























        answered Mar 26 at 18:03









        triitrii

        86317




        86317






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3162083%2fproving-the-dimension-of-a-manifold-is-well-defined%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Nidaros erkebispedøme

            Birsay

            Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...