Existence of 3 natural numbers that divide each other when squared and have 1 taken away from them ...
How widely used is the term Treppenwitz? Is it something that most Germans know?
What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?
Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?
Error "illegal generic type for instanceof" when using local classes
How to answer "Have you ever been terminated?"
List of Python versions
How to call a function with default parameter through a pointer to function that is the return of another function?
How come Sam didn't become Lord of Horn Hill?
Sci-Fi book where patients in a coma ward all live in a subconscious world linked together
What is Arya's weapon design?
How to align text above triangle figure
Okay to merge included columns on otherwise identical indexes?
What does an IRS interview request entail when called in to verify expenses for a sole proprietor small business?
What is the meaning of the new sigil in Game of Thrones Season 8 intro?
In predicate logic, does existential quantification (∃) include universal quantification (∀), i.e. can 'some' imply 'all'?
Using et al. for a last / senior author rather than for a first author
How to tell that you are a giant?
Dating a Former Employee
How to react to hostile behavior from a senior developer?
Why was the term "discrete" used in discrete logarithm?
Apollo command module space walk?
How to bypass password on Windows XP account?
Output the ŋarâþ crîþ alphabet song without using (m)any letters
How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?
Existence of 3 natural numbers that divide each other when squared and have 1 taken away from them
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)What is the relationship between any natural number and two other natural numbers?Is sum and product of $k$ natural numbers always different from that of some other $k$ natural numbers?Non-existence of natural numbers such that $sqrt{n} +sqrt{n+1} <sqrt{x} +sqrt{y} <sqrt{4n+2}$Prove there do not exist natural numbers m and n such that $7m^2 = n^2$.Given $0 < p < n$, prove there exists $n$ consecutive natural numbers such that each natural is divisible by at least $p$ distinct primes.There are infinitely many powers of $2$ that are at least $10^6$ away from any square and cubeFind all natural numbers $m,n$ such that $m|12n-1$ and $n|12m-1$let M be a set of those natural numbers that can be written using only 0's and 1'sShow that for any natural number n between $n^2$ and$(n+1)^2$ there exist 3 distinct natural numbers a, b, c, so that $a^2+b^2$ is divisible by cAre there any two numbers such that multiplying them together is the same as putting their digits next to each other?
$begingroup$
Does there exist natural numbers, $a,b,c > 1$, such that;
$a^2 - 1$ is divisible by $b$ and $c$,
$b^2 - 1$ is divisible by $a$ and $c$ and
$c^2 - 1$ is divisible by $a$ and $b$.
number-theory natural-numbers
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Does there exist natural numbers, $a,b,c > 1$, such that;
$a^2 - 1$ is divisible by $b$ and $c$,
$b^2 - 1$ is divisible by $a$ and $c$ and
$c^2 - 1$ is divisible by $a$ and $b$.
number-theory natural-numbers
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Hello and welcome to math.stackexchange. This is a nice question. What are your thoughts? What have you tried? Any results from searching for examples?
$endgroup$
– Hans Engler
Mar 24 at 12:59
4
$begingroup$
Unless $b,c$ are prime it is not true that $b,c$ must divide one of $a+1,a-1$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 24 at 13:03
2
$begingroup$
If you think that the first part of the problem statement implies that $b$ and $c$ must each divide $a-1$ or $a+1$, and similarly for the other two parts, I think you will quickly find that it can't work that way.
$endgroup$
– David K
Mar 24 at 13:06
1
$begingroup$
The only triples with five out of six; and all three below 1000, are: $(3,4,5),(3,7,8),(8,21,55),(24,115,551),(15,56,209)$
$endgroup$
– Empy2
Mar 24 at 13:29
1
$begingroup$
Those triples include $(n^2-1,n^3-2n,n^4-3n^2+1)$
$endgroup$
– Empy2
Mar 24 at 13:59
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
Does there exist natural numbers, $a,b,c > 1$, such that;
$a^2 - 1$ is divisible by $b$ and $c$,
$b^2 - 1$ is divisible by $a$ and $c$ and
$c^2 - 1$ is divisible by $a$ and $b$.
number-theory natural-numbers
$endgroup$
Does there exist natural numbers, $a,b,c > 1$, such that;
$a^2 - 1$ is divisible by $b$ and $c$,
$b^2 - 1$ is divisible by $a$ and $c$ and
$c^2 - 1$ is divisible by $a$ and $b$.
number-theory natural-numbers
number-theory natural-numbers
asked Mar 24 at 12:46
jjhhbb9jjhhbb9
183
183
1
$begingroup$
Hello and welcome to math.stackexchange. This is a nice question. What are your thoughts? What have you tried? Any results from searching for examples?
$endgroup$
– Hans Engler
Mar 24 at 12:59
4
$begingroup$
Unless $b,c$ are prime it is not true that $b,c$ must divide one of $a+1,a-1$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 24 at 13:03
2
$begingroup$
If you think that the first part of the problem statement implies that $b$ and $c$ must each divide $a-1$ or $a+1$, and similarly for the other two parts, I think you will quickly find that it can't work that way.
$endgroup$
– David K
Mar 24 at 13:06
1
$begingroup$
The only triples with five out of six; and all three below 1000, are: $(3,4,5),(3,7,8),(8,21,55),(24,115,551),(15,56,209)$
$endgroup$
– Empy2
Mar 24 at 13:29
1
$begingroup$
Those triples include $(n^2-1,n^3-2n,n^4-3n^2+1)$
$endgroup$
– Empy2
Mar 24 at 13:59
|
show 3 more comments
1
$begingroup$
Hello and welcome to math.stackexchange. This is a nice question. What are your thoughts? What have you tried? Any results from searching for examples?
$endgroup$
– Hans Engler
Mar 24 at 12:59
4
$begingroup$
Unless $b,c$ are prime it is not true that $b,c$ must divide one of $a+1,a-1$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 24 at 13:03
2
$begingroup$
If you think that the first part of the problem statement implies that $b$ and $c$ must each divide $a-1$ or $a+1$, and similarly for the other two parts, I think you will quickly find that it can't work that way.
$endgroup$
– David K
Mar 24 at 13:06
1
$begingroup$
The only triples with five out of six; and all three below 1000, are: $(3,4,5),(3,7,8),(8,21,55),(24,115,551),(15,56,209)$
$endgroup$
– Empy2
Mar 24 at 13:29
1
$begingroup$
Those triples include $(n^2-1,n^3-2n,n^4-3n^2+1)$
$endgroup$
– Empy2
Mar 24 at 13:59
1
1
$begingroup$
Hello and welcome to math.stackexchange. This is a nice question. What are your thoughts? What have you tried? Any results from searching for examples?
$endgroup$
– Hans Engler
Mar 24 at 12:59
$begingroup$
Hello and welcome to math.stackexchange. This is a nice question. What are your thoughts? What have you tried? Any results from searching for examples?
$endgroup$
– Hans Engler
Mar 24 at 12:59
4
4
$begingroup$
Unless $b,c$ are prime it is not true that $b,c$ must divide one of $a+1,a-1$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 24 at 13:03
$begingroup$
Unless $b,c$ are prime it is not true that $b,c$ must divide one of $a+1,a-1$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 24 at 13:03
2
2
$begingroup$
If you think that the first part of the problem statement implies that $b$ and $c$ must each divide $a-1$ or $a+1$, and similarly for the other two parts, I think you will quickly find that it can't work that way.
$endgroup$
– David K
Mar 24 at 13:06
$begingroup$
If you think that the first part of the problem statement implies that $b$ and $c$ must each divide $a-1$ or $a+1$, and similarly for the other two parts, I think you will quickly find that it can't work that way.
$endgroup$
– David K
Mar 24 at 13:06
1
1
$begingroup$
The only triples with five out of six; and all three below 1000, are: $(3,4,5),(3,7,8),(8,21,55),(24,115,551),(15,56,209)$
$endgroup$
– Empy2
Mar 24 at 13:29
$begingroup$
The only triples with five out of six; and all three below 1000, are: $(3,4,5),(3,7,8),(8,21,55),(24,115,551),(15,56,209)$
$endgroup$
– Empy2
Mar 24 at 13:29
1
1
$begingroup$
Those triples include $(n^2-1,n^3-2n,n^4-3n^2+1)$
$endgroup$
– Empy2
Mar 24 at 13:59
$begingroup$
Those triples include $(n^2-1,n^3-2n,n^4-3n^2+1)$
$endgroup$
– Empy2
Mar 24 at 13:59
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No such numbers exist.
First, observe that $a,b,c$ are pairwise coprime: For example, since $a$ divides $b^2-1$, any prime $p$ that divides $a$ also divides $b^2 - 1$; hence $p$ does not divide $b^2$ and also does not divide $b$. Thus $a$ and $b$ are coprime; and likewise for the other pairs.
Since $b,c$ are coprime and each divide $a^2 - 1$, so does their product $bc$. Since all the quantities are positive, that implies $bc le a^2 - 1 lt a^2$. So we have three strict inequalities:
$$
begin{align}
bc < a^2\
ac < b^2\
ab < c^2
end{align}
$$
Multiplying these inequalities together yields
$$
a^2 b^2 c^2 lt a^2 b^2 c^2
$$
which is impossible.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3160498%2fexistence-of-3-natural-numbers-that-divide-each-other-when-squared-and-have-1-ta%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No such numbers exist.
First, observe that $a,b,c$ are pairwise coprime: For example, since $a$ divides $b^2-1$, any prime $p$ that divides $a$ also divides $b^2 - 1$; hence $p$ does not divide $b^2$ and also does not divide $b$. Thus $a$ and $b$ are coprime; and likewise for the other pairs.
Since $b,c$ are coprime and each divide $a^2 - 1$, so does their product $bc$. Since all the quantities are positive, that implies $bc le a^2 - 1 lt a^2$. So we have three strict inequalities:
$$
begin{align}
bc < a^2\
ac < b^2\
ab < c^2
end{align}
$$
Multiplying these inequalities together yields
$$
a^2 b^2 c^2 lt a^2 b^2 c^2
$$
which is impossible.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No such numbers exist.
First, observe that $a,b,c$ are pairwise coprime: For example, since $a$ divides $b^2-1$, any prime $p$ that divides $a$ also divides $b^2 - 1$; hence $p$ does not divide $b^2$ and also does not divide $b$. Thus $a$ and $b$ are coprime; and likewise for the other pairs.
Since $b,c$ are coprime and each divide $a^2 - 1$, so does their product $bc$. Since all the quantities are positive, that implies $bc le a^2 - 1 lt a^2$. So we have three strict inequalities:
$$
begin{align}
bc < a^2\
ac < b^2\
ab < c^2
end{align}
$$
Multiplying these inequalities together yields
$$
a^2 b^2 c^2 lt a^2 b^2 c^2
$$
which is impossible.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No such numbers exist.
First, observe that $a,b,c$ are pairwise coprime: For example, since $a$ divides $b^2-1$, any prime $p$ that divides $a$ also divides $b^2 - 1$; hence $p$ does not divide $b^2$ and also does not divide $b$. Thus $a$ and $b$ are coprime; and likewise for the other pairs.
Since $b,c$ are coprime and each divide $a^2 - 1$, so does their product $bc$. Since all the quantities are positive, that implies $bc le a^2 - 1 lt a^2$. So we have three strict inequalities:
$$
begin{align}
bc < a^2\
ac < b^2\
ab < c^2
end{align}
$$
Multiplying these inequalities together yields
$$
a^2 b^2 c^2 lt a^2 b^2 c^2
$$
which is impossible.
$endgroup$
No such numbers exist.
First, observe that $a,b,c$ are pairwise coprime: For example, since $a$ divides $b^2-1$, any prime $p$ that divides $a$ also divides $b^2 - 1$; hence $p$ does not divide $b^2$ and also does not divide $b$. Thus $a$ and $b$ are coprime; and likewise for the other pairs.
Since $b,c$ are coprime and each divide $a^2 - 1$, so does their product $bc$. Since all the quantities are positive, that implies $bc le a^2 - 1 lt a^2$. So we have three strict inequalities:
$$
begin{align}
bc < a^2\
ac < b^2\
ab < c^2
end{align}
$$
Multiplying these inequalities together yields
$$
a^2 b^2 c^2 lt a^2 b^2 c^2
$$
which is impossible.
answered Mar 24 at 15:08
FredHFredH
3,6851024
3,6851024
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3160498%2fexistence-of-3-natural-numbers-that-divide-each-other-when-squared-and-have-1-ta%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Hello and welcome to math.stackexchange. This is a nice question. What are your thoughts? What have you tried? Any results from searching for examples?
$endgroup$
– Hans Engler
Mar 24 at 12:59
4
$begingroup$
Unless $b,c$ are prime it is not true that $b,c$ must divide one of $a+1,a-1$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Mar 24 at 13:03
2
$begingroup$
If you think that the first part of the problem statement implies that $b$ and $c$ must each divide $a-1$ or $a+1$, and similarly for the other two parts, I think you will quickly find that it can't work that way.
$endgroup$
– David K
Mar 24 at 13:06
1
$begingroup$
The only triples with five out of six; and all three below 1000, are: $(3,4,5),(3,7,8),(8,21,55),(24,115,551),(15,56,209)$
$endgroup$
– Empy2
Mar 24 at 13:29
1
$begingroup$
Those triples include $(n^2-1,n^3-2n,n^4-3n^2+1)$
$endgroup$
– Empy2
Mar 24 at 13:59