How to plot this group bar plot?How to control the layering of graphics displayed with ShowBarChart with...
I reported the illegal activity of my boss to his boss. My boss found out. Now I am being punished. What should I do?
When a wind turbine does not produce enough electricity how does the power company compensate for the loss?
Doubts in understanding some concepts of potential energy
How does Ehrenfest's theorem apply to the quantum harmonic oscillator?
Would an aboleth's Phantasmal Force lair action be affected by Counterspell, Dispel Magic, and/or Slow?
What can I do if someone tampers with my SSH public key?
Having the player face themselves after the mid-game
Street obstacles in New Zealand
Power Strip for Europe
Does Christianity allow for believing on someone else's behalf?
Which situations would cause a company to ground or recall a aircraft series?
Does "Until when" sound natural for native speakers?
Are there historical instances of the capital of a colonising country being temporarily or permanently shifted to one of its colonies?
How can I get players to focus on the story aspect of D&D?
Why is gluten-free baking possible?
Is it possible to avoid unpacking when merging Association?
What do *foreign films* mean for an American?
Can I negotiate a patent idea for a raise, under French law?
From an axiomatic set theoric approach why can we take uncountable unions?
Trig Subsitution When There's No Square Root
Why do we say ‘pairwise disjoint’, rather than ‘disjoint’?
Why aren't there more Gauls like Obelix?
Why couldn't the separatists legally leave the Republic?
Proving a statement about real numbers
How to plot this group bar plot?
How to control the layering of graphics displayed with ShowBarChart with relative abundances as chart labelsBarChart: plotting bars at given positionsHow do I animate a bar chart?Color coded bar to represent numeric valuesFormatting bar charts: size and ticksBarChart3d not working as expectedHow to draw two error bars at one point in Mathematica?Is that possible to adjust the bar legend size in GraphicsGrid or DensityPlot automatically?Plotting ListStepPlot with error bar
$begingroup$
I want to generate a barplot with the following characteristics.
There are 5 users in the system. Each user has a demand.
There are 2 suppliers.
Each supplier tries to meet user demand as closely as possible.
One supplier may perform better than the other supplier.
I want a grouped barplot.
There will be two bars for each user (demand and supply)
The supply bar should combine the supplies from two supplies in such a way that the
For example,
Demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
Supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
Supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
I just want to combine Supply1
and Supply2
in one bar. So, there will only five supply bars. The demand bars and the supply bars are then grouped as shown in the attached figure.
It is like putting one supply bar above another but both should be visible. The shorter one will always on top so that both are visible.
But the problem I have with this plot is that for the last group, I cannot see the red bar, which is somehow hidden below the purple bar.
This one I obtained with MATLAB. I hope Mathematica can help me with what I need.
plotting graphics charts
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I want to generate a barplot with the following characteristics.
There are 5 users in the system. Each user has a demand.
There are 2 suppliers.
Each supplier tries to meet user demand as closely as possible.
One supplier may perform better than the other supplier.
I want a grouped barplot.
There will be two bars for each user (demand and supply)
The supply bar should combine the supplies from two supplies in such a way that the
For example,
Demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
Supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
Supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
I just want to combine Supply1
and Supply2
in one bar. So, there will only five supply bars. The demand bars and the supply bars are then grouped as shown in the attached figure.
It is like putting one supply bar above another but both should be visible. The shorter one will always on top so that both are visible.
But the problem I have with this plot is that for the last group, I cannot see the red bar, which is somehow hidden below the purple bar.
This one I obtained with MATLAB. I hope Mathematica can help me with what I need.
plotting graphics charts
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What have you tried so far usingBarChart
?
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@kglr, this is not what I want. I have revised my question...
$endgroup$
– dipak narayanan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
try adding the optionChartBaseStyle -> Opacity[.5]
?
$endgroup$
– kglr
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because the OP is asking for the impossible, despite reasonable suggestions. Furthermore, any solution will be extremely localized to their problem only.
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because overloading bar charts makes for unintelligible displays. If there are two objectives for displaying data, then (despite objections from publishers) maybe two separate displays are needed.
$endgroup$
– JimB
2 days ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I want to generate a barplot with the following characteristics.
There are 5 users in the system. Each user has a demand.
There are 2 suppliers.
Each supplier tries to meet user demand as closely as possible.
One supplier may perform better than the other supplier.
I want a grouped barplot.
There will be two bars for each user (demand and supply)
The supply bar should combine the supplies from two supplies in such a way that the
For example,
Demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
Supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
Supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
I just want to combine Supply1
and Supply2
in one bar. So, there will only five supply bars. The demand bars and the supply bars are then grouped as shown in the attached figure.
It is like putting one supply bar above another but both should be visible. The shorter one will always on top so that both are visible.
But the problem I have with this plot is that for the last group, I cannot see the red bar, which is somehow hidden below the purple bar.
This one I obtained with MATLAB. I hope Mathematica can help me with what I need.
plotting graphics charts
$endgroup$
I want to generate a barplot with the following characteristics.
There are 5 users in the system. Each user has a demand.
There are 2 suppliers.
Each supplier tries to meet user demand as closely as possible.
One supplier may perform better than the other supplier.
I want a grouped barplot.
There will be two bars for each user (demand and supply)
The supply bar should combine the supplies from two supplies in such a way that the
For example,
Demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
Supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
Supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
I just want to combine Supply1
and Supply2
in one bar. So, there will only five supply bars. The demand bars and the supply bars are then grouped as shown in the attached figure.
It is like putting one supply bar above another but both should be visible. The shorter one will always on top so that both are visible.
But the problem I have with this plot is that for the last group, I cannot see the red bar, which is somehow hidden below the purple bar.
This one I obtained with MATLAB. I hope Mathematica can help me with what I need.
plotting graphics charts
plotting graphics charts
edited 2 days ago
MarcoB
37.4k556113
37.4k556113
asked 2 days ago
dipak narayanandipak narayanan
1266
1266
$begingroup$
What have you tried so far usingBarChart
?
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@kglr, this is not what I want. I have revised my question...
$endgroup$
– dipak narayanan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
try adding the optionChartBaseStyle -> Opacity[.5]
?
$endgroup$
– kglr
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because the OP is asking for the impossible, despite reasonable suggestions. Furthermore, any solution will be extremely localized to their problem only.
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because overloading bar charts makes for unintelligible displays. If there are two objectives for displaying data, then (despite objections from publishers) maybe two separate displays are needed.
$endgroup$
– JimB
2 days ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
What have you tried so far usingBarChart
?
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@kglr, this is not what I want. I have revised my question...
$endgroup$
– dipak narayanan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
try adding the optionChartBaseStyle -> Opacity[.5]
?
$endgroup$
– kglr
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because the OP is asking for the impossible, despite reasonable suggestions. Furthermore, any solution will be extremely localized to their problem only.
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because overloading bar charts makes for unintelligible displays. If there are two objectives for displaying data, then (despite objections from publishers) maybe two separate displays are needed.
$endgroup$
– JimB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
What have you tried so far using
BarChart
?$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
What have you tried so far using
BarChart
?$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@kglr, this is not what I want. I have revised my question...
$endgroup$
– dipak narayanan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@kglr, this is not what I want. I have revised my question...
$endgroup$
– dipak narayanan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
try adding the option
ChartBaseStyle -> Opacity[.5]
?$endgroup$
– kglr
2 days ago
$begingroup$
try adding the option
ChartBaseStyle -> Opacity[.5]
?$endgroup$
– kglr
2 days ago
2
2
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because the OP is asking for the impossible, despite reasonable suggestions. Furthermore, any solution will be extremely localized to their problem only.
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because the OP is asking for the impossible, despite reasonable suggestions. Furthermore, any solution will be extremely localized to their problem only.
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because overloading bar charts makes for unintelligible displays. If there are two objectives for displaying data, then (despite objections from publishers) maybe two separate displays are needed.
$endgroup$
– JimB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because overloading bar charts makes for unintelligible displays. If there are two objectives for displaying data, then (despite objections from publishers) maybe two separate displays are needed.
$endgroup$
– JimB
2 days ago
|
show 2 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Update 2: A better approach to pre-processing is to use two separate BarChart
s` (as in m_goldberg's answer):
demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
s = Transpose[{Style[#, Blue] & /@ supply1, Style[#, Yellow] & /@ supply2}];
sb = SortBy[#, -First[#] &] & /@ s;
b1 = BarChart[Transpose[{Style[#, Red] & /@ demand, sb[[All,1]]}],
ChartLabels -> {Placed["Group " <> ToString[#] & /@ Range[5], Axis],
Placed[{"D", "S"}, Axis]},
ChartLegends -> SwatchLegend[{Red, Blue, Yellow}, {"D", "S1", "S2"}]];
b2 = BarChart[Transpose[{Style[#, Red] & /@ demand, sb[[All,2]]}]];
Show[b1, b2]
Update: An alternative, more convenient and better, approach is to pre-process data to reorder based on heights:
sb = SortBy[#, -First[#] &] & /@ s;
datab = Join @@ Thread[{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, d, sb}];
bcb = BarChart[datab, ChartLayout -> "Overlapped",
ChartLegends -> SwatchLegend[{Red, Blue, Yellow}, {"D", "S1", "S2"}],
BarSpacing -> {0, .1}]
With this approach we don't need to add PerformanceGoal -> "Speed"
, thus we retain all the tool-tips and and dynamic highlighting.
Original answer:
BarChart
does not support mixed layouts (it does not allow combining Grouped
and Overlapped
layouts). So, we cheat by inserting fake data sets with 0 height betweeen groups to separate the five groups and, to make all rectangles visible, we post-process to re-order the yellow and blue rectangles based on their heights (I added PerformanceGoal -> "Speed"
above to make this post-processing easier):
demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
s = Transpose[{Style[#, Blue] & /@ supply1, Style[#, Yellow] & /@ supply2}];
d = Thread[{Style[#, Red] & /@ demand, Style[0, Opacity[0]]}];
data = Join @@ Thread[{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, d, s}];
bc = BarChart[data,
ChartLayout -> "Overlapped",
ChartLegends -> SwatchLegend[{Red, Blue, Yellow}, {"D", "S1", "S2"}],
BarSpacing -> {0, .1}, PerformanceGoal -> "Speed"];
bc /. pattern : {{_, Rectangle[{_, _}, {_, h1_}, ___]}, {_,
Rectangle[{_, _}, {_, h2_}, ___]}} :> If[h2 <= h1, pattern, Reverse[pattern]]
Fixing ticks and labels is an altogether different challenge.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yep, this is the kind of heroic effort that I was hinting at in my comments... Thank you for trying though. (+1)
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
thank you @MarcoB.
$endgroup$
– kglr
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This will reproduce your matlab generated chart.
Demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
Supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
Supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
b1 = BarChart[Transpose[{Demand, Supply2}],
ChartStyle -> {{Automatic}, {Automatic, Red}}];
b2 = BarChart[Transpose[{Demand, Supply1}]];
Show[b1, b2, Frame -> True]
It has the same defect as the matlab chart — the longer blue bar at the right end of chart hides the shorter red bar behind it.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I suppose that, if OP's purpose is simply to get the plot, one could add{Supply1, Supply2} = Transpose[Sort /@ Transpose[{Supply1, Supply2}]]
before the calls toBarChart
to "swap" the offending last values fromSupply1
andSupply2
.
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@MarcoB. Yes, something like that would work, but it would ruin the stark simplicity of this answer :-), which is mainly to point out that hoe easy it is to reproduce the defective matlab chart. I think kglr's answer is better than mine because it makes the chart that is really wanted in a simple way.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192883%2fhow-to-plot-this-group-bar-plot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Update 2: A better approach to pre-processing is to use two separate BarChart
s` (as in m_goldberg's answer):
demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
s = Transpose[{Style[#, Blue] & /@ supply1, Style[#, Yellow] & /@ supply2}];
sb = SortBy[#, -First[#] &] & /@ s;
b1 = BarChart[Transpose[{Style[#, Red] & /@ demand, sb[[All,1]]}],
ChartLabels -> {Placed["Group " <> ToString[#] & /@ Range[5], Axis],
Placed[{"D", "S"}, Axis]},
ChartLegends -> SwatchLegend[{Red, Blue, Yellow}, {"D", "S1", "S2"}]];
b2 = BarChart[Transpose[{Style[#, Red] & /@ demand, sb[[All,2]]}]];
Show[b1, b2]
Update: An alternative, more convenient and better, approach is to pre-process data to reorder based on heights:
sb = SortBy[#, -First[#] &] & /@ s;
datab = Join @@ Thread[{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, d, sb}];
bcb = BarChart[datab, ChartLayout -> "Overlapped",
ChartLegends -> SwatchLegend[{Red, Blue, Yellow}, {"D", "S1", "S2"}],
BarSpacing -> {0, .1}]
With this approach we don't need to add PerformanceGoal -> "Speed"
, thus we retain all the tool-tips and and dynamic highlighting.
Original answer:
BarChart
does not support mixed layouts (it does not allow combining Grouped
and Overlapped
layouts). So, we cheat by inserting fake data sets with 0 height betweeen groups to separate the five groups and, to make all rectangles visible, we post-process to re-order the yellow and blue rectangles based on their heights (I added PerformanceGoal -> "Speed"
above to make this post-processing easier):
demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
s = Transpose[{Style[#, Blue] & /@ supply1, Style[#, Yellow] & /@ supply2}];
d = Thread[{Style[#, Red] & /@ demand, Style[0, Opacity[0]]}];
data = Join @@ Thread[{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, d, s}];
bc = BarChart[data,
ChartLayout -> "Overlapped",
ChartLegends -> SwatchLegend[{Red, Blue, Yellow}, {"D", "S1", "S2"}],
BarSpacing -> {0, .1}, PerformanceGoal -> "Speed"];
bc /. pattern : {{_, Rectangle[{_, _}, {_, h1_}, ___]}, {_,
Rectangle[{_, _}, {_, h2_}, ___]}} :> If[h2 <= h1, pattern, Reverse[pattern]]
Fixing ticks and labels is an altogether different challenge.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yep, this is the kind of heroic effort that I was hinting at in my comments... Thank you for trying though. (+1)
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
thank you @MarcoB.
$endgroup$
– kglr
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Update 2: A better approach to pre-processing is to use two separate BarChart
s` (as in m_goldberg's answer):
demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
s = Transpose[{Style[#, Blue] & /@ supply1, Style[#, Yellow] & /@ supply2}];
sb = SortBy[#, -First[#] &] & /@ s;
b1 = BarChart[Transpose[{Style[#, Red] & /@ demand, sb[[All,1]]}],
ChartLabels -> {Placed["Group " <> ToString[#] & /@ Range[5], Axis],
Placed[{"D", "S"}, Axis]},
ChartLegends -> SwatchLegend[{Red, Blue, Yellow}, {"D", "S1", "S2"}]];
b2 = BarChart[Transpose[{Style[#, Red] & /@ demand, sb[[All,2]]}]];
Show[b1, b2]
Update: An alternative, more convenient and better, approach is to pre-process data to reorder based on heights:
sb = SortBy[#, -First[#] &] & /@ s;
datab = Join @@ Thread[{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, d, sb}];
bcb = BarChart[datab, ChartLayout -> "Overlapped",
ChartLegends -> SwatchLegend[{Red, Blue, Yellow}, {"D", "S1", "S2"}],
BarSpacing -> {0, .1}]
With this approach we don't need to add PerformanceGoal -> "Speed"
, thus we retain all the tool-tips and and dynamic highlighting.
Original answer:
BarChart
does not support mixed layouts (it does not allow combining Grouped
and Overlapped
layouts). So, we cheat by inserting fake data sets with 0 height betweeen groups to separate the five groups and, to make all rectangles visible, we post-process to re-order the yellow and blue rectangles based on their heights (I added PerformanceGoal -> "Speed"
above to make this post-processing easier):
demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
s = Transpose[{Style[#, Blue] & /@ supply1, Style[#, Yellow] & /@ supply2}];
d = Thread[{Style[#, Red] & /@ demand, Style[0, Opacity[0]]}];
data = Join @@ Thread[{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, d, s}];
bc = BarChart[data,
ChartLayout -> "Overlapped",
ChartLegends -> SwatchLegend[{Red, Blue, Yellow}, {"D", "S1", "S2"}],
BarSpacing -> {0, .1}, PerformanceGoal -> "Speed"];
bc /. pattern : {{_, Rectangle[{_, _}, {_, h1_}, ___]}, {_,
Rectangle[{_, _}, {_, h2_}, ___]}} :> If[h2 <= h1, pattern, Reverse[pattern]]
Fixing ticks and labels is an altogether different challenge.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yep, this is the kind of heroic effort that I was hinting at in my comments... Thank you for trying though. (+1)
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
thank you @MarcoB.
$endgroup$
– kglr
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Update 2: A better approach to pre-processing is to use two separate BarChart
s` (as in m_goldberg's answer):
demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
s = Transpose[{Style[#, Blue] & /@ supply1, Style[#, Yellow] & /@ supply2}];
sb = SortBy[#, -First[#] &] & /@ s;
b1 = BarChart[Transpose[{Style[#, Red] & /@ demand, sb[[All,1]]}],
ChartLabels -> {Placed["Group " <> ToString[#] & /@ Range[5], Axis],
Placed[{"D", "S"}, Axis]},
ChartLegends -> SwatchLegend[{Red, Blue, Yellow}, {"D", "S1", "S2"}]];
b2 = BarChart[Transpose[{Style[#, Red] & /@ demand, sb[[All,2]]}]];
Show[b1, b2]
Update: An alternative, more convenient and better, approach is to pre-process data to reorder based on heights:
sb = SortBy[#, -First[#] &] & /@ s;
datab = Join @@ Thread[{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, d, sb}];
bcb = BarChart[datab, ChartLayout -> "Overlapped",
ChartLegends -> SwatchLegend[{Red, Blue, Yellow}, {"D", "S1", "S2"}],
BarSpacing -> {0, .1}]
With this approach we don't need to add PerformanceGoal -> "Speed"
, thus we retain all the tool-tips and and dynamic highlighting.
Original answer:
BarChart
does not support mixed layouts (it does not allow combining Grouped
and Overlapped
layouts). So, we cheat by inserting fake data sets with 0 height betweeen groups to separate the five groups and, to make all rectangles visible, we post-process to re-order the yellow and blue rectangles based on their heights (I added PerformanceGoal -> "Speed"
above to make this post-processing easier):
demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
s = Transpose[{Style[#, Blue] & /@ supply1, Style[#, Yellow] & /@ supply2}];
d = Thread[{Style[#, Red] & /@ demand, Style[0, Opacity[0]]}];
data = Join @@ Thread[{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, d, s}];
bc = BarChart[data,
ChartLayout -> "Overlapped",
ChartLegends -> SwatchLegend[{Red, Blue, Yellow}, {"D", "S1", "S2"}],
BarSpacing -> {0, .1}, PerformanceGoal -> "Speed"];
bc /. pattern : {{_, Rectangle[{_, _}, {_, h1_}, ___]}, {_,
Rectangle[{_, _}, {_, h2_}, ___]}} :> If[h2 <= h1, pattern, Reverse[pattern]]
Fixing ticks and labels is an altogether different challenge.
$endgroup$
Update 2: A better approach to pre-processing is to use two separate BarChart
s` (as in m_goldberg's answer):
demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
s = Transpose[{Style[#, Blue] & /@ supply1, Style[#, Yellow] & /@ supply2}];
sb = SortBy[#, -First[#] &] & /@ s;
b1 = BarChart[Transpose[{Style[#, Red] & /@ demand, sb[[All,1]]}],
ChartLabels -> {Placed["Group " <> ToString[#] & /@ Range[5], Axis],
Placed[{"D", "S"}, Axis]},
ChartLegends -> SwatchLegend[{Red, Blue, Yellow}, {"D", "S1", "S2"}]];
b2 = BarChart[Transpose[{Style[#, Red] & /@ demand, sb[[All,2]]}]];
Show[b1, b2]
Update: An alternative, more convenient and better, approach is to pre-process data to reorder based on heights:
sb = SortBy[#, -First[#] &] & /@ s;
datab = Join @@ Thread[{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, d, sb}];
bcb = BarChart[datab, ChartLayout -> "Overlapped",
ChartLegends -> SwatchLegend[{Red, Blue, Yellow}, {"D", "S1", "S2"}],
BarSpacing -> {0, .1}]
With this approach we don't need to add PerformanceGoal -> "Speed"
, thus we retain all the tool-tips and and dynamic highlighting.
Original answer:
BarChart
does not support mixed layouts (it does not allow combining Grouped
and Overlapped
layouts). So, we cheat by inserting fake data sets with 0 height betweeen groups to separate the five groups and, to make all rectangles visible, we post-process to re-order the yellow and blue rectangles based on their heights (I added PerformanceGoal -> "Speed"
above to make this post-processing easier):
demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
s = Transpose[{Style[#, Blue] & /@ supply1, Style[#, Yellow] & /@ supply2}];
d = Thread[{Style[#, Red] & /@ demand, Style[0, Opacity[0]]}];
data = Join @@ Thread[{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, d, s}];
bc = BarChart[data,
ChartLayout -> "Overlapped",
ChartLegends -> SwatchLegend[{Red, Blue, Yellow}, {"D", "S1", "S2"}],
BarSpacing -> {0, .1}, PerformanceGoal -> "Speed"];
bc /. pattern : {{_, Rectangle[{_, _}, {_, h1_}, ___]}, {_,
Rectangle[{_, _}, {_, h2_}, ___]}} :> If[h2 <= h1, pattern, Reverse[pattern]]
Fixing ticks and labels is an altogether different challenge.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
kglrkglr
188k10203421
188k10203421
$begingroup$
Yep, this is the kind of heroic effort that I was hinting at in my comments... Thank you for trying though. (+1)
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
thank you @MarcoB.
$endgroup$
– kglr
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yep, this is the kind of heroic effort that I was hinting at in my comments... Thank you for trying though. (+1)
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
thank you @MarcoB.
$endgroup$
– kglr
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yep, this is the kind of heroic effort that I was hinting at in my comments... Thank you for trying though. (+1)
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yep, this is the kind of heroic effort that I was hinting at in my comments... Thank you for trying though. (+1)
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
thank you @MarcoB.
$endgroup$
– kglr
2 days ago
$begingroup$
thank you @MarcoB.
$endgroup$
– kglr
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This will reproduce your matlab generated chart.
Demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
Supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
Supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
b1 = BarChart[Transpose[{Demand, Supply2}],
ChartStyle -> {{Automatic}, {Automatic, Red}}];
b2 = BarChart[Transpose[{Demand, Supply1}]];
Show[b1, b2, Frame -> True]
It has the same defect as the matlab chart — the longer blue bar at the right end of chart hides the shorter red bar behind it.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I suppose that, if OP's purpose is simply to get the plot, one could add{Supply1, Supply2} = Transpose[Sort /@ Transpose[{Supply1, Supply2}]]
before the calls toBarChart
to "swap" the offending last values fromSupply1
andSupply2
.
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@MarcoB. Yes, something like that would work, but it would ruin the stark simplicity of this answer :-), which is mainly to point out that hoe easy it is to reproduce the defective matlab chart. I think kglr's answer is better than mine because it makes the chart that is really wanted in a simple way.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This will reproduce your matlab generated chart.
Demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
Supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
Supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
b1 = BarChart[Transpose[{Demand, Supply2}],
ChartStyle -> {{Automatic}, {Automatic, Red}}];
b2 = BarChart[Transpose[{Demand, Supply1}]];
Show[b1, b2, Frame -> True]
It has the same defect as the matlab chart — the longer blue bar at the right end of chart hides the shorter red bar behind it.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I suppose that, if OP's purpose is simply to get the plot, one could add{Supply1, Supply2} = Transpose[Sort /@ Transpose[{Supply1, Supply2}]]
before the calls toBarChart
to "swap" the offending last values fromSupply1
andSupply2
.
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@MarcoB. Yes, something like that would work, but it would ruin the stark simplicity of this answer :-), which is mainly to point out that hoe easy it is to reproduce the defective matlab chart. I think kglr's answer is better than mine because it makes the chart that is really wanted in a simple way.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This will reproduce your matlab generated chart.
Demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
Supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
Supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
b1 = BarChart[Transpose[{Demand, Supply2}],
ChartStyle -> {{Automatic}, {Automatic, Red}}];
b2 = BarChart[Transpose[{Demand, Supply1}]];
Show[b1, b2, Frame -> True]
It has the same defect as the matlab chart — the longer blue bar at the right end of chart hides the shorter red bar behind it.
$endgroup$
This will reproduce your matlab generated chart.
Demand = {10, 15, 20, 17, 9};
Supply1 = {8, 13, 18, 14, 11};
Supply2 = {9, 14, 19, 16, 10};
b1 = BarChart[Transpose[{Demand, Supply2}],
ChartStyle -> {{Automatic}, {Automatic, Red}}];
b2 = BarChart[Transpose[{Demand, Supply1}]];
Show[b1, b2, Frame -> True]
It has the same defect as the matlab chart — the longer blue bar at the right end of chart hides the shorter red bar behind it.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
m_goldbergm_goldberg
87.4k872198
87.4k872198
$begingroup$
I suppose that, if OP's purpose is simply to get the plot, one could add{Supply1, Supply2} = Transpose[Sort /@ Transpose[{Supply1, Supply2}]]
before the calls toBarChart
to "swap" the offending last values fromSupply1
andSupply2
.
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@MarcoB. Yes, something like that would work, but it would ruin the stark simplicity of this answer :-), which is mainly to point out that hoe easy it is to reproduce the defective matlab chart. I think kglr's answer is better than mine because it makes the chart that is really wanted in a simple way.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I suppose that, if OP's purpose is simply to get the plot, one could add{Supply1, Supply2} = Transpose[Sort /@ Transpose[{Supply1, Supply2}]]
before the calls toBarChart
to "swap" the offending last values fromSupply1
andSupply2
.
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@MarcoB. Yes, something like that would work, but it would ruin the stark simplicity of this answer :-), which is mainly to point out that hoe easy it is to reproduce the defective matlab chart. I think kglr's answer is better than mine because it makes the chart that is really wanted in a simple way.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I suppose that, if OP's purpose is simply to get the plot, one could add
{Supply1, Supply2} = Transpose[Sort /@ Transpose[{Supply1, Supply2}]]
before the calls to BarChart
to "swap" the offending last values from Supply1
and Supply2
.$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I suppose that, if OP's purpose is simply to get the plot, one could add
{Supply1, Supply2} = Transpose[Sort /@ Transpose[{Supply1, Supply2}]]
before the calls to BarChart
to "swap" the offending last values from Supply1
and Supply2
.$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@MarcoB. Yes, something like that would work, but it would ruin the stark simplicity of this answer :-), which is mainly to point out that hoe easy it is to reproduce the defective matlab chart. I think kglr's answer is better than mine because it makes the chart that is really wanted in a simple way.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@MarcoB. Yes, something like that would work, but it would ruin the stark simplicity of this answer :-), which is mainly to point out that hoe easy it is to reproduce the defective matlab chart. I think kglr's answer is better than mine because it makes the chart that is really wanted in a simple way.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192883%2fhow-to-plot-this-group-bar-plot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What have you tried so far using
BarChart
?$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@kglr, this is not what I want. I have revised my question...
$endgroup$
– dipak narayanan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
try adding the option
ChartBaseStyle -> Opacity[.5]
?$endgroup$
– kglr
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because the OP is asking for the impossible, despite reasonable suggestions. Furthermore, any solution will be extremely localized to their problem only.
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because overloading bar charts makes for unintelligible displays. If there are two objectives for displaying data, then (despite objections from publishers) maybe two separate displays are needed.
$endgroup$
– JimB
2 days ago