Upper bound on alternating harmonic seriesHarmonic Numbers series IDouble series of Harmonic NumbersProof of...

PTIJ: Haman's bad computer

The IT department bottlenecks progress. How should I handle this?

Do the primes contain an infinite almost arithmetic progression?

Redundant comparison & "if" before assignment

Keeping a ball lost forever

It grows, but water kills it

Why is the "ls" command showing permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?

Extract more than nine arguments that occur periodically in a sentence to use in macros in order to typset

Can I still be respawned if I die by falling off the map?

What is Cash Advance APR?

Why is this estimator biased?

What exact color does ozone gas have?

Non-trope happy ending?

How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?

Picking the different solutions to the time independent Schrodinger eqaution

Is there an injective, monotonically increasing, strictly concave function from the reals, to the reals?

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

On a tidally locked planet, would time be quantized?

Plot of a tornado-shaped surface

Can the US President recognize Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights for the USA or does that need an act of Congress?

Moving brute-force search to FPGA

Why does a simple loop result in ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits?

Can a College of Swords bard use a Blade Flourish option on an opportunity attack provoked by their own Dissonant Whispers spell?

How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?



Upper bound on alternating harmonic series


Harmonic Numbers series IDouble series of Harmonic NumbersProof of an upper bound for $sum_{i=c}^{infty} frac{1}{i^k}$Harmonic Sum and cardinality of continuumShow monotonicity of an Alternating SeriesUpper bound on a series: $sum_{k = M}^{infty} (a/sqrt(k))^k$Upper bound on a series of integralsAlternating harmonic series containing floor functionrearrangement of the alternating harmonic seriesUpper bound for the probability of violating a set of conditions













0












$begingroup$


Let $a > 0$. Is the following statement true:
begin{align}
ln(2) = sum_{n=1}^infty{frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n}} > sum_{n=1}^infty{frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n+a}}
end{align}

From my intuition the statement is true, because in absolute terms the numbers on the right hand side are smaller










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $a > 0$. Is the following statement true:
    begin{align}
    ln(2) = sum_{n=1}^infty{frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n}} > sum_{n=1}^infty{frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n+a}}
    end{align}

    From my intuition the statement is true, because in absolute terms the numbers on the right hand side are smaller










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0


      2



      $begingroup$


      Let $a > 0$. Is the following statement true:
      begin{align}
      ln(2) = sum_{n=1}^infty{frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n}} > sum_{n=1}^infty{frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n+a}}
      end{align}

      From my intuition the statement is true, because in absolute terms the numbers on the right hand side are smaller










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $a > 0$. Is the following statement true:
      begin{align}
      ln(2) = sum_{n=1}^infty{frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n}} > sum_{n=1}^infty{frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n+a}}
      end{align}

      From my intuition the statement is true, because in absolute terms the numbers on the right hand side are smaller







      sequences-and-series upper-lower-bounds






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 13 at 16:19









      cluelessclueless

      307111




      307111






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The argument based on absolute values may not be correct since the terms may alternatively go below or above each other. A safer way naturally is to remove the oscillation in the terms:
          $$x_n{=sum_{n=1}^{infty}{(-1)^{n+1}over n}\=sum_{k=0}^infty {1over (2k+1)(2k+2)}}$$
          $$y_n{=sum_{n=1}^{infty}{(-1)^{n+1}over n+a}\=sum_{k=0}^infty {1over (2k+1+a)(2k+2+a)}}$$since for $a>0$ we can say $${1over (2k+1+a)(2k+2+a)}<{1over (2k+1)(2k+2)}$$by term by term summation we can conclude what we want.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            We have



            $$sum_{n=1}^infty left( frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n} - frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n+a} right) = sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^{n+1} left( frac{1}{n} - frac{1}{n+a} right) = a sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n(n+a)}$$



            This is greater than zero because this is an alternating series and $frac{1}{n(n+a)}$ is strictly decreasing.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146804%2fupper-bound-on-alternating-harmonic-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              The argument based on absolute values may not be correct since the terms may alternatively go below or above each other. A safer way naturally is to remove the oscillation in the terms:
              $$x_n{=sum_{n=1}^{infty}{(-1)^{n+1}over n}\=sum_{k=0}^infty {1over (2k+1)(2k+2)}}$$
              $$y_n{=sum_{n=1}^{infty}{(-1)^{n+1}over n+a}\=sum_{k=0}^infty {1over (2k+1+a)(2k+2+a)}}$$since for $a>0$ we can say $${1over (2k+1+a)(2k+2+a)}<{1over (2k+1)(2k+2)}$$by term by term summation we can conclude what we want.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                The argument based on absolute values may not be correct since the terms may alternatively go below or above each other. A safer way naturally is to remove the oscillation in the terms:
                $$x_n{=sum_{n=1}^{infty}{(-1)^{n+1}over n}\=sum_{k=0}^infty {1over (2k+1)(2k+2)}}$$
                $$y_n{=sum_{n=1}^{infty}{(-1)^{n+1}over n+a}\=sum_{k=0}^infty {1over (2k+1+a)(2k+2+a)}}$$since for $a>0$ we can say $${1over (2k+1+a)(2k+2+a)}<{1over (2k+1)(2k+2)}$$by term by term summation we can conclude what we want.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  The argument based on absolute values may not be correct since the terms may alternatively go below or above each other. A safer way naturally is to remove the oscillation in the terms:
                  $$x_n{=sum_{n=1}^{infty}{(-1)^{n+1}over n}\=sum_{k=0}^infty {1over (2k+1)(2k+2)}}$$
                  $$y_n{=sum_{n=1}^{infty}{(-1)^{n+1}over n+a}\=sum_{k=0}^infty {1over (2k+1+a)(2k+2+a)}}$$since for $a>0$ we can say $${1over (2k+1+a)(2k+2+a)}<{1over (2k+1)(2k+2)}$$by term by term summation we can conclude what we want.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  The argument based on absolute values may not be correct since the terms may alternatively go below or above each other. A safer way naturally is to remove the oscillation in the terms:
                  $$x_n{=sum_{n=1}^{infty}{(-1)^{n+1}over n}\=sum_{k=0}^infty {1over (2k+1)(2k+2)}}$$
                  $$y_n{=sum_{n=1}^{infty}{(-1)^{n+1}over n+a}\=sum_{k=0}^infty {1over (2k+1+a)(2k+2+a)}}$$since for $a>0$ we can say $${1over (2k+1+a)(2k+2+a)}<{1over (2k+1)(2k+2)}$$by term by term summation we can conclude what we want.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 13 at 17:41









                  Mostafa AyazMostafa Ayaz

                  17.2k31039




                  17.2k31039























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      We have



                      $$sum_{n=1}^infty left( frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n} - frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n+a} right) = sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^{n+1} left( frac{1}{n} - frac{1}{n+a} right) = a sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n(n+a)}$$



                      This is greater than zero because this is an alternating series and $frac{1}{n(n+a)}$ is strictly decreasing.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        We have



                        $$sum_{n=1}^infty left( frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n} - frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n+a} right) = sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^{n+1} left( frac{1}{n} - frac{1}{n+a} right) = a sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n(n+a)}$$



                        This is greater than zero because this is an alternating series and $frac{1}{n(n+a)}$ is strictly decreasing.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          We have



                          $$sum_{n=1}^infty left( frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n} - frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n+a} right) = sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^{n+1} left( frac{1}{n} - frac{1}{n+a} right) = a sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n(n+a)}$$



                          This is greater than zero because this is an alternating series and $frac{1}{n(n+a)}$ is strictly decreasing.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          We have



                          $$sum_{n=1}^infty left( frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n} - frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n+a} right) = sum_{n=1}^infty (-1)^{n+1} left( frac{1}{n} - frac{1}{n+a} right) = a sum_{n=1}^infty frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n(n+a)}$$



                          This is greater than zero because this is an alternating series and $frac{1}{n(n+a)}$ is strictly decreasing.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Mar 13 at 16:29









                          Haris GusicHaris Gusic

                          2,738423




                          2,738423






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146804%2fupper-bound-on-alternating-harmonic-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Nidaros erkebispedøme

                              Birsay

                              Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...