Poles defining a function - do two equivalent expressions share the same poles?When is a function satisfying...
Can I run a new neutral wire to repair a broken circuit?
Can we compute the area of a quadrilateral with one right angle when we only know the lengths of any three sides?
Mathematica command that allows it to read my intentions
Why didn't Miles's spider sense work before?
Why can't we play rap on piano?
Is the myth that if you can play one instrument, you can learn another instrument with ease true?
Ambiguity in the definition of entropy
Examples of smooth manifolds admitting inbetween one and a continuum of complex structures
How did the Super Star Destroyer Executor get destroyed exactly?
Intersection Puzzle
Why are the 737's rear doors unusable in a water landing?
Avoiding direct proof while writing proof by induction
How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?
How do conventional missiles fly?
Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?
How do I gain back my faith in my PhD degree?
Arrow those variables!
What killed these X2 caps?
Reverse dictionary where values are lists
If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?
Can compressed videos be decoded back to their uncompresed original format?
Why would the Red Woman birth a shadow if she worshipped the Lord of the Light?
What does the expression "A Mann!" means
What exploit Are these user agents trying to use?
Poles defining a function - do two equivalent expressions share the same poles?
When is a function satisfying the Cauchy-Riemann equations holomorphic?closed form of $sum frac{1}{z^3 - n^3}$The function $p(z)$ has finitely many poles and sum of residues zeroCan it be proved that a Meromorphic function only has a countable number of poles?Finding a Laurent Series involving two polesWhy must a meromorphic function, bounded near infinity, have the same number of poles and zeros?Elliptic Functions, Residue Computation, Same zeros and poles of same ordersPoles of hypergeometric function $_2F_1$Show that the poles of analytic function $f$ cannot have a limit point in $G$.Change of the hyperplane equation in $mathbb{C^3}$.
$begingroup$
Take a term $f$, with poles at $z=1, z=2$, i.e
$f=dfrac{g}{(z-1)(z-2)}$.
Now assume that $f$ can be split into two (or more) terms, as
$f equiv h_1 + h_2$
Is it true that $h_1$ and $h_2$ must have the same poles as $f$? Is it true that if not, then their overall form must have the total same poles, i.e if they don't individally have the same poles as $f$, then the terms must have a form like
$h_1 = dfrac{a}{(z-2)} quad h_2 = dfrac{b}{(z-1)}$
complex-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take a term $f$, with poles at $z=1, z=2$, i.e
$f=dfrac{g}{(z-1)(z-2)}$.
Now assume that $f$ can be split into two (or more) terms, as
$f equiv h_1 + h_2$
Is it true that $h_1$ and $h_2$ must have the same poles as $f$? Is it true that if not, then their overall form must have the total same poles, i.e if they don't individally have the same poles as $f$, then the terms must have a form like
$h_1 = dfrac{a}{(z-2)} quad h_2 = dfrac{b}{(z-1)}$
complex-analysis
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You can always replace $(h_1, h_2)$ by $(h_1 + phi, h_2 - phi)$ with an arbitrary function $phi$ (having as much poles as you want).
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 18 at 21:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take a term $f$, with poles at $z=1, z=2$, i.e
$f=dfrac{g}{(z-1)(z-2)}$.
Now assume that $f$ can be split into two (or more) terms, as
$f equiv h_1 + h_2$
Is it true that $h_1$ and $h_2$ must have the same poles as $f$? Is it true that if not, then their overall form must have the total same poles, i.e if they don't individally have the same poles as $f$, then the terms must have a form like
$h_1 = dfrac{a}{(z-2)} quad h_2 = dfrac{b}{(z-1)}$
complex-analysis
$endgroup$
Take a term $f$, with poles at $z=1, z=2$, i.e
$f=dfrac{g}{(z-1)(z-2)}$.
Now assume that $f$ can be split into two (or more) terms, as
$f equiv h_1 + h_2$
Is it true that $h_1$ and $h_2$ must have the same poles as $f$? Is it true that if not, then their overall form must have the total same poles, i.e if they don't individally have the same poles as $f$, then the terms must have a form like
$h_1 = dfrac{a}{(z-2)} quad h_2 = dfrac{b}{(z-1)}$
complex-analysis
complex-analysis
asked Mar 18 at 20:29
BradBrad
103
103
$begingroup$
You can always replace $(h_1, h_2)$ by $(h_1 + phi, h_2 - phi)$ with an arbitrary function $phi$ (having as much poles as you want).
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 18 at 21:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can always replace $(h_1, h_2)$ by $(h_1 + phi, h_2 - phi)$ with an arbitrary function $phi$ (having as much poles as you want).
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 18 at 21:00
$begingroup$
You can always replace $(h_1, h_2)$ by $(h_1 + phi, h_2 - phi)$ with an arbitrary function $phi$ (having as much poles as you want).
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 18 at 21:00
$begingroup$
You can always replace $(h_1, h_2)$ by $(h_1 + phi, h_2 - phi)$ with an arbitrary function $phi$ (having as much poles as you want).
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 18 at 21:00
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
To give a simplified version of the situation, suppose you have a single variable $,z,$ and define the simple poles $,p_0 := 1/z,, p_1 := 1/(z-1),, p_2 := 1/(z-2),,$ and so on. Suppose you have finite set of simple poles $,P := {p_i,p_j,dots,p_k},$ and a finite sum of them
$,S := c_i,p_i + c_j,p_j + cdots + c_k,p_k.,$ Then the poles are linearly independent and so any two sums $,S,$ and $,S',$ are equal iff they have the same poles with the same coefficients. You can have higher order poles such as
$,p_i^2,$ and $, p_j^3,$ and so on, but they are all linearly independent. Think of P as a set of independent variables used to construct multi-variable polynomials. Linear algebra rules here. Any rational function of
$,z,$ with poles in $,P,$ can be uniquely split into the sum of a polynomial in the simple poles $,P,$ and a polynomial in $,z.,$
As a simple example:
$$ frac{2 + z + 3 z^2 + 4 z^3 + 5 z^4}{z, (z - 1), (z - 2)} =
frac1z + frac{-15}{z-1} + frac{64}{z-2} + 19 + 5,z.$$
P.S. Try this decomposition yourself. Here is some Wolfram Mathematica code:
decompRatFunc[r_, z_] := Module[ {poles, poly}, poles =
DeleteCases[r // Factor // Apart, _?NumberQ | z^n_. _. /; n > 0];
poly = r - poles // Simplify // Expand; {poles, poly}];
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3153283%2fpoles-defining-a-function-do-two-equivalent-expressions-share-the-same-poles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
To give a simplified version of the situation, suppose you have a single variable $,z,$ and define the simple poles $,p_0 := 1/z,, p_1 := 1/(z-1),, p_2 := 1/(z-2),,$ and so on. Suppose you have finite set of simple poles $,P := {p_i,p_j,dots,p_k},$ and a finite sum of them
$,S := c_i,p_i + c_j,p_j + cdots + c_k,p_k.,$ Then the poles are linearly independent and so any two sums $,S,$ and $,S',$ are equal iff they have the same poles with the same coefficients. You can have higher order poles such as
$,p_i^2,$ and $, p_j^3,$ and so on, but they are all linearly independent. Think of P as a set of independent variables used to construct multi-variable polynomials. Linear algebra rules here. Any rational function of
$,z,$ with poles in $,P,$ can be uniquely split into the sum of a polynomial in the simple poles $,P,$ and a polynomial in $,z.,$
As a simple example:
$$ frac{2 + z + 3 z^2 + 4 z^3 + 5 z^4}{z, (z - 1), (z - 2)} =
frac1z + frac{-15}{z-1} + frac{64}{z-2} + 19 + 5,z.$$
P.S. Try this decomposition yourself. Here is some Wolfram Mathematica code:
decompRatFunc[r_, z_] := Module[ {poles, poly}, poles =
DeleteCases[r // Factor // Apart, _?NumberQ | z^n_. _. /; n > 0];
poly = r - poles // Simplify // Expand; {poles, poly}];
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To give a simplified version of the situation, suppose you have a single variable $,z,$ and define the simple poles $,p_0 := 1/z,, p_1 := 1/(z-1),, p_2 := 1/(z-2),,$ and so on. Suppose you have finite set of simple poles $,P := {p_i,p_j,dots,p_k},$ and a finite sum of them
$,S := c_i,p_i + c_j,p_j + cdots + c_k,p_k.,$ Then the poles are linearly independent and so any two sums $,S,$ and $,S',$ are equal iff they have the same poles with the same coefficients. You can have higher order poles such as
$,p_i^2,$ and $, p_j^3,$ and so on, but they are all linearly independent. Think of P as a set of independent variables used to construct multi-variable polynomials. Linear algebra rules here. Any rational function of
$,z,$ with poles in $,P,$ can be uniquely split into the sum of a polynomial in the simple poles $,P,$ and a polynomial in $,z.,$
As a simple example:
$$ frac{2 + z + 3 z^2 + 4 z^3 + 5 z^4}{z, (z - 1), (z - 2)} =
frac1z + frac{-15}{z-1} + frac{64}{z-2} + 19 + 5,z.$$
P.S. Try this decomposition yourself. Here is some Wolfram Mathematica code:
decompRatFunc[r_, z_] := Module[ {poles, poly}, poles =
DeleteCases[r // Factor // Apart, _?NumberQ | z^n_. _. /; n > 0];
poly = r - poles // Simplify // Expand; {poles, poly}];
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To give a simplified version of the situation, suppose you have a single variable $,z,$ and define the simple poles $,p_0 := 1/z,, p_1 := 1/(z-1),, p_2 := 1/(z-2),,$ and so on. Suppose you have finite set of simple poles $,P := {p_i,p_j,dots,p_k},$ and a finite sum of them
$,S := c_i,p_i + c_j,p_j + cdots + c_k,p_k.,$ Then the poles are linearly independent and so any two sums $,S,$ and $,S',$ are equal iff they have the same poles with the same coefficients. You can have higher order poles such as
$,p_i^2,$ and $, p_j^3,$ and so on, but they are all linearly independent. Think of P as a set of independent variables used to construct multi-variable polynomials. Linear algebra rules here. Any rational function of
$,z,$ with poles in $,P,$ can be uniquely split into the sum of a polynomial in the simple poles $,P,$ and a polynomial in $,z.,$
As a simple example:
$$ frac{2 + z + 3 z^2 + 4 z^3 + 5 z^4}{z, (z - 1), (z - 2)} =
frac1z + frac{-15}{z-1} + frac{64}{z-2} + 19 + 5,z.$$
P.S. Try this decomposition yourself. Here is some Wolfram Mathematica code:
decompRatFunc[r_, z_] := Module[ {poles, poly}, poles =
DeleteCases[r // Factor // Apart, _?NumberQ | z^n_. _. /; n > 0];
poly = r - poles // Simplify // Expand; {poles, poly}];
$endgroup$
To give a simplified version of the situation, suppose you have a single variable $,z,$ and define the simple poles $,p_0 := 1/z,, p_1 := 1/(z-1),, p_2 := 1/(z-2),,$ and so on. Suppose you have finite set of simple poles $,P := {p_i,p_j,dots,p_k},$ and a finite sum of them
$,S := c_i,p_i + c_j,p_j + cdots + c_k,p_k.,$ Then the poles are linearly independent and so any two sums $,S,$ and $,S',$ are equal iff they have the same poles with the same coefficients. You can have higher order poles such as
$,p_i^2,$ and $, p_j^3,$ and so on, but they are all linearly independent. Think of P as a set of independent variables used to construct multi-variable polynomials. Linear algebra rules here. Any rational function of
$,z,$ with poles in $,P,$ can be uniquely split into the sum of a polynomial in the simple poles $,P,$ and a polynomial in $,z.,$
As a simple example:
$$ frac{2 + z + 3 z^2 + 4 z^3 + 5 z^4}{z, (z - 1), (z - 2)} =
frac1z + frac{-15}{z-1} + frac{64}{z-2} + 19 + 5,z.$$
P.S. Try this decomposition yourself. Here is some Wolfram Mathematica code:
decompRatFunc[r_, z_] := Module[ {poles, poly}, poles =
DeleteCases[r // Factor // Apart, _?NumberQ | z^n_. _. /; n > 0];
poly = r - poles // Simplify // Expand; {poles, poly}];
edited Mar 19 at 0:47
answered Mar 18 at 21:46
SomosSomos
14.7k11337
14.7k11337
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3153283%2fpoles-defining-a-function-do-two-equivalent-expressions-share-the-same-poles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
You can always replace $(h_1, h_2)$ by $(h_1 + phi, h_2 - phi)$ with an arbitrary function $phi$ (having as much poles as you want).
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 18 at 21:00