Poles defining a function - do two equivalent expressions share the same poles?When is a function satisfying...

Can I run a new neutral wire to repair a broken circuit?

Can we compute the area of a quadrilateral with one right angle when we only know the lengths of any three sides?

Mathematica command that allows it to read my intentions

Why didn't Miles's spider sense work before?

Why can't we play rap on piano?

Is the myth that if you can play one instrument, you can learn another instrument with ease true?

Ambiguity in the definition of entropy

Examples of smooth manifolds admitting inbetween one and a continuum of complex structures

How did the Super Star Destroyer Executor get destroyed exactly?

Intersection Puzzle

Why are the 737's rear doors unusable in a water landing?

Avoiding direct proof while writing proof by induction

How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?

How do conventional missiles fly?

Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?

How do I gain back my faith in my PhD degree?

Arrow those variables!

What killed these X2 caps?

Reverse dictionary where values are lists

If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?

Can compressed videos be decoded back to their uncompresed original format?

Why would the Red Woman birth a shadow if she worshipped the Lord of the Light?

What does the expression "A Mann!" means

What exploit Are these user agents trying to use?



Poles defining a function - do two equivalent expressions share the same poles?


When is a function satisfying the Cauchy-Riemann equations holomorphic?closed form of $sum frac{1}{z^3 - n^3}$The function $p(z)$ has finitely many poles and sum of residues zeroCan it be proved that a Meromorphic function only has a countable number of poles?Finding a Laurent Series involving two polesWhy must a meromorphic function, bounded near infinity, have the same number of poles and zeros?Elliptic Functions, Residue Computation, Same zeros and poles of same ordersPoles of hypergeometric function $_2F_1$Show that the poles of analytic function $f$ cannot have a limit point in $G$.Change of the hyperplane equation in $mathbb{C^3}$.













0












$begingroup$


Take a term $f$, with poles at $z=1, z=2$, i.e



$f=dfrac{g}{(z-1)(z-2)}$.



Now assume that $f$ can be split into two (or more) terms, as



$f equiv h_1 + h_2$



Is it true that $h_1$ and $h_2$ must have the same poles as $f$? Is it true that if not, then their overall form must have the total same poles, i.e if they don't individally have the same poles as $f$, then the terms must have a form like



$h_1 = dfrac{a}{(z-2)} quad h_2 = dfrac{b}{(z-1)}$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You can always replace $(h_1, h_2)$ by $(h_1 + phi, h_2 - phi)$ with an arbitrary function $phi$ (having as much poles as you want).
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Mar 18 at 21:00
















0












$begingroup$


Take a term $f$, with poles at $z=1, z=2$, i.e



$f=dfrac{g}{(z-1)(z-2)}$.



Now assume that $f$ can be split into two (or more) terms, as



$f equiv h_1 + h_2$



Is it true that $h_1$ and $h_2$ must have the same poles as $f$? Is it true that if not, then their overall form must have the total same poles, i.e if they don't individally have the same poles as $f$, then the terms must have a form like



$h_1 = dfrac{a}{(z-2)} quad h_2 = dfrac{b}{(z-1)}$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You can always replace $(h_1, h_2)$ by $(h_1 + phi, h_2 - phi)$ with an arbitrary function $phi$ (having as much poles as you want).
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Mar 18 at 21:00














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Take a term $f$, with poles at $z=1, z=2$, i.e



$f=dfrac{g}{(z-1)(z-2)}$.



Now assume that $f$ can be split into two (or more) terms, as



$f equiv h_1 + h_2$



Is it true that $h_1$ and $h_2$ must have the same poles as $f$? Is it true that if not, then their overall form must have the total same poles, i.e if they don't individally have the same poles as $f$, then the terms must have a form like



$h_1 = dfrac{a}{(z-2)} quad h_2 = dfrac{b}{(z-1)}$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Take a term $f$, with poles at $z=1, z=2$, i.e



$f=dfrac{g}{(z-1)(z-2)}$.



Now assume that $f$ can be split into two (or more) terms, as



$f equiv h_1 + h_2$



Is it true that $h_1$ and $h_2$ must have the same poles as $f$? Is it true that if not, then their overall form must have the total same poles, i.e if they don't individally have the same poles as $f$, then the terms must have a form like



$h_1 = dfrac{a}{(z-2)} quad h_2 = dfrac{b}{(z-1)}$







complex-analysis






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 18 at 20:29









BradBrad

103




103












  • $begingroup$
    You can always replace $(h_1, h_2)$ by $(h_1 + phi, h_2 - phi)$ with an arbitrary function $phi$ (having as much poles as you want).
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Mar 18 at 21:00


















  • $begingroup$
    You can always replace $(h_1, h_2)$ by $(h_1 + phi, h_2 - phi)$ with an arbitrary function $phi$ (having as much poles as you want).
    $endgroup$
    – Martin R
    Mar 18 at 21:00
















$begingroup$
You can always replace $(h_1, h_2)$ by $(h_1 + phi, h_2 - phi)$ with an arbitrary function $phi$ (having as much poles as you want).
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 18 at 21:00




$begingroup$
You can always replace $(h_1, h_2)$ by $(h_1 + phi, h_2 - phi)$ with an arbitrary function $phi$ (having as much poles as you want).
$endgroup$
– Martin R
Mar 18 at 21:00










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

To give a simplified version of the situation, suppose you have a single variable $,z,$ and define the simple poles $,p_0 := 1/z,, p_1 := 1/(z-1),, p_2 := 1/(z-2),,$ and so on. Suppose you have finite set of simple poles $,P := {p_i,p_j,dots,p_k},$ and a finite sum of them
$,S := c_i,p_i + c_j,p_j + cdots + c_k,p_k.,$ Then the poles are linearly independent and so any two sums $,S,$ and $,S',$ are equal iff they have the same poles with the same coefficients. You can have higher order poles such as
$,p_i^2,$ and $, p_j^3,$ and so on, but they are all linearly independent. Think of P as a set of independent variables used to construct multi-variable polynomials. Linear algebra rules here. Any rational function of
$,z,$ with poles in $,P,$ can be uniquely split into the sum of a polynomial in the simple poles $,P,$ and a polynomial in $,z.,$



As a simple example:
$$ frac{2 + z + 3 z^2 + 4 z^3 + 5 z^4}{z, (z - 1), (z - 2)} =
frac1z + frac{-15}{z-1} + frac{64}{z-2} + 19 + 5,z.$$



P.S. Try this decomposition yourself. Here is some Wolfram Mathematica code:



decompRatFunc[r_, z_] := Module[ {poles, poly}, poles = 
DeleteCases[r // Factor // Apart, _?NumberQ | z^n_. _. /; n > 0];
poly = r - poles // Simplify // Expand; {poles, poly}];





share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3153283%2fpoles-defining-a-function-do-two-equivalent-expressions-share-the-same-poles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    To give a simplified version of the situation, suppose you have a single variable $,z,$ and define the simple poles $,p_0 := 1/z,, p_1 := 1/(z-1),, p_2 := 1/(z-2),,$ and so on. Suppose you have finite set of simple poles $,P := {p_i,p_j,dots,p_k},$ and a finite sum of them
    $,S := c_i,p_i + c_j,p_j + cdots + c_k,p_k.,$ Then the poles are linearly independent and so any two sums $,S,$ and $,S',$ are equal iff they have the same poles with the same coefficients. You can have higher order poles such as
    $,p_i^2,$ and $, p_j^3,$ and so on, but they are all linearly independent. Think of P as a set of independent variables used to construct multi-variable polynomials. Linear algebra rules here. Any rational function of
    $,z,$ with poles in $,P,$ can be uniquely split into the sum of a polynomial in the simple poles $,P,$ and a polynomial in $,z.,$



    As a simple example:
    $$ frac{2 + z + 3 z^2 + 4 z^3 + 5 z^4}{z, (z - 1), (z - 2)} =
    frac1z + frac{-15}{z-1} + frac{64}{z-2} + 19 + 5,z.$$



    P.S. Try this decomposition yourself. Here is some Wolfram Mathematica code:



    decompRatFunc[r_, z_] := Module[ {poles, poly}, poles = 
    DeleteCases[r // Factor // Apart, _?NumberQ | z^n_. _. /; n > 0];
    poly = r - poles // Simplify // Expand; {poles, poly}];





    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      To give a simplified version of the situation, suppose you have a single variable $,z,$ and define the simple poles $,p_0 := 1/z,, p_1 := 1/(z-1),, p_2 := 1/(z-2),,$ and so on. Suppose you have finite set of simple poles $,P := {p_i,p_j,dots,p_k},$ and a finite sum of them
      $,S := c_i,p_i + c_j,p_j + cdots + c_k,p_k.,$ Then the poles are linearly independent and so any two sums $,S,$ and $,S',$ are equal iff they have the same poles with the same coefficients. You can have higher order poles such as
      $,p_i^2,$ and $, p_j^3,$ and so on, but they are all linearly independent. Think of P as a set of independent variables used to construct multi-variable polynomials. Linear algebra rules here. Any rational function of
      $,z,$ with poles in $,P,$ can be uniquely split into the sum of a polynomial in the simple poles $,P,$ and a polynomial in $,z.,$



      As a simple example:
      $$ frac{2 + z + 3 z^2 + 4 z^3 + 5 z^4}{z, (z - 1), (z - 2)} =
      frac1z + frac{-15}{z-1} + frac{64}{z-2} + 19 + 5,z.$$



      P.S. Try this decomposition yourself. Here is some Wolfram Mathematica code:



      decompRatFunc[r_, z_] := Module[ {poles, poly}, poles = 
      DeleteCases[r // Factor // Apart, _?NumberQ | z^n_. _. /; n > 0];
      poly = r - poles // Simplify // Expand; {poles, poly}];





      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        To give a simplified version of the situation, suppose you have a single variable $,z,$ and define the simple poles $,p_0 := 1/z,, p_1 := 1/(z-1),, p_2 := 1/(z-2),,$ and so on. Suppose you have finite set of simple poles $,P := {p_i,p_j,dots,p_k},$ and a finite sum of them
        $,S := c_i,p_i + c_j,p_j + cdots + c_k,p_k.,$ Then the poles are linearly independent and so any two sums $,S,$ and $,S',$ are equal iff they have the same poles with the same coefficients. You can have higher order poles such as
        $,p_i^2,$ and $, p_j^3,$ and so on, but they are all linearly independent. Think of P as a set of independent variables used to construct multi-variable polynomials. Linear algebra rules here. Any rational function of
        $,z,$ with poles in $,P,$ can be uniquely split into the sum of a polynomial in the simple poles $,P,$ and a polynomial in $,z.,$



        As a simple example:
        $$ frac{2 + z + 3 z^2 + 4 z^3 + 5 z^4}{z, (z - 1), (z - 2)} =
        frac1z + frac{-15}{z-1} + frac{64}{z-2} + 19 + 5,z.$$



        P.S. Try this decomposition yourself. Here is some Wolfram Mathematica code:



        decompRatFunc[r_, z_] := Module[ {poles, poly}, poles = 
        DeleteCases[r // Factor // Apart, _?NumberQ | z^n_. _. /; n > 0];
        poly = r - poles // Simplify // Expand; {poles, poly}];





        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        To give a simplified version of the situation, suppose you have a single variable $,z,$ and define the simple poles $,p_0 := 1/z,, p_1 := 1/(z-1),, p_2 := 1/(z-2),,$ and so on. Suppose you have finite set of simple poles $,P := {p_i,p_j,dots,p_k},$ and a finite sum of them
        $,S := c_i,p_i + c_j,p_j + cdots + c_k,p_k.,$ Then the poles are linearly independent and so any two sums $,S,$ and $,S',$ are equal iff they have the same poles with the same coefficients. You can have higher order poles such as
        $,p_i^2,$ and $, p_j^3,$ and so on, but they are all linearly independent. Think of P as a set of independent variables used to construct multi-variable polynomials. Linear algebra rules here. Any rational function of
        $,z,$ with poles in $,P,$ can be uniquely split into the sum of a polynomial in the simple poles $,P,$ and a polynomial in $,z.,$



        As a simple example:
        $$ frac{2 + z + 3 z^2 + 4 z^3 + 5 z^4}{z, (z - 1), (z - 2)} =
        frac1z + frac{-15}{z-1} + frac{64}{z-2} + 19 + 5,z.$$



        P.S. Try this decomposition yourself. Here is some Wolfram Mathematica code:



        decompRatFunc[r_, z_] := Module[ {poles, poly}, poles = 
        DeleteCases[r // Factor // Apart, _?NumberQ | z^n_. _. /; n > 0];
        poly = r - poles // Simplify // Expand; {poles, poly}];






        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Mar 19 at 0:47

























        answered Mar 18 at 21:46









        SomosSomos

        14.7k11337




        14.7k11337






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3153283%2fpoles-defining-a-function-do-two-equivalent-expressions-share-the-same-poles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Nidaros erkebispedøme

            Birsay

            Where did Arya get these scars? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Favourite questions and answers from the 1st quarter of 2019Why did Arya refuse to end it?Has the pronunciation of Arya Stark's name changed?Has Arya forgiven people?Why did Arya Stark lose her vision?Why can Arya still use the faces?Has the Narrow Sea become narrower?Does Arya Stark know how to make poisons outside of the House of Black and White?Why did Nymeria leave Arya?Why did Arya not kill the Lannister soldiers she encountered in the Riverlands?What is the current canonical age of Sansa, Bran and Arya Stark?