The uniqueness of the continuation of the functional. Announcing the arrival of Valued...

Apollo command module space walk?

What LEGO pieces have "real-world" functionality?

If a contract sometimes uses the wrong name, is it still valid?

Book where humans were engineered with genes from animal species to survive hostile planets

At the end of Thor: Ragnarok why don't the Asgardians turn and head for the Bifrost as per their original plan?

Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems

Why did the rest of the Eastern Bloc not invade Yugoslavia?

When do you get frequent flier miles - when you buy, or when you fly?

How to call a function with default parameter through a pointer to function that is the return of another function?

51k Euros annually for a family of 4 in Berlin: Is it enough?

How does the particle を relate to the verb 行く in the structure「A を + B に行く」?

Can an alien society believe that their star system is the universe?

Output the ŋarâþ crîþ alphabet song without using (m)any letters

Using audio cues to encourage good posture

What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?

English words in a non-english sci-fi novel

What is the meaning of the new sigil in Game of Thrones Season 8 intro?

Denied boarding although I have proper visa and documentation. To whom should I make a complaint?

Can a non-EU citizen traveling with me come with me through the EU passport line?

Extract all GPU name, model and GPU ram

Why are Kinder Surprise Eggs illegal in the USA?

Sci-Fi book where patients in a coma ward all live in a subconscious world linked together

Overriding an object in memory with placement new

How to deal with a team lead who never gives me credit?



The uniqueness of the continuation of the functional.



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Distance between bounded and compact setsA simple adjoint operator questionMetric tensors and linear (differential) operators defined on a manifold and its osculating sphereShow, that $c$ and $c_0$ is a Banach spaceFinding the conjugate operator of the following operatorsHahn-Banach From Systems of Linear EquationsUnderstanding notation for Holder's inequality with the counting measuretensor product of locally convex spacesHahn-Banach and normed spaceUse Hahn-Banach to prove existence of dual elements












5












$begingroup$


I have a continuous linear functional $f_0 in c_0^*$ where



$$c_0 = lbrace{x: (x_1, dots, x_n, dots)|lim_{nrightarrowinfty}x_n = 0rbrace} subset m = lbrace{x: (x_1, dots, x_n, dots)|sup_{ninmathbb{N}}|x_n| < inftyrbrace}$$



My question:




Prove that $f_0$ have a uniqueness continuation $f$ on space $m$ with respecting the norm, i.e
$$forall x in c_0, f(x) = f_0(x)quad text{and}quad ||f_0|| = ||f||.$$




The Hahn-Banach theorem guarantees the existence of such a continuation, but not its uniqueness. I tried to figure out some properties of the space conjugate to $c_0$. I proved that $c_0^* cong l^1$. Having proved this, I saw how functionals on $c_0$ looks like. Then I proved that $(l^1)^* cong m$ and saw how functionals on $l^1$ looks like. This is good, because in these spaces I cannot use the Riesz theorem, but, as I said, in the process of the proof I obtained the general form of functionals on these spaces.



But further, I do not know what to do. How to use this information? Or maybe there are some tricky lemmas or theorems that give information about the uniqueness of the continuation?



Could you tell me what to do next? Thanks in advance!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    5












    $begingroup$


    I have a continuous linear functional $f_0 in c_0^*$ where



    $$c_0 = lbrace{x: (x_1, dots, x_n, dots)|lim_{nrightarrowinfty}x_n = 0rbrace} subset m = lbrace{x: (x_1, dots, x_n, dots)|sup_{ninmathbb{N}}|x_n| < inftyrbrace}$$



    My question:




    Prove that $f_0$ have a uniqueness continuation $f$ on space $m$ with respecting the norm, i.e
    $$forall x in c_0, f(x) = f_0(x)quad text{and}quad ||f_0|| = ||f||.$$




    The Hahn-Banach theorem guarantees the existence of such a continuation, but not its uniqueness. I tried to figure out some properties of the space conjugate to $c_0$. I proved that $c_0^* cong l^1$. Having proved this, I saw how functionals on $c_0$ looks like. Then I proved that $(l^1)^* cong m$ and saw how functionals on $l^1$ looks like. This is good, because in these spaces I cannot use the Riesz theorem, but, as I said, in the process of the proof I obtained the general form of functionals on these spaces.



    But further, I do not know what to do. How to use this information? Or maybe there are some tricky lemmas or theorems that give information about the uniqueness of the continuation?



    Could you tell me what to do next? Thanks in advance!










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      5












      5








      5


      3



      $begingroup$


      I have a continuous linear functional $f_0 in c_0^*$ where



      $$c_0 = lbrace{x: (x_1, dots, x_n, dots)|lim_{nrightarrowinfty}x_n = 0rbrace} subset m = lbrace{x: (x_1, dots, x_n, dots)|sup_{ninmathbb{N}}|x_n| < inftyrbrace}$$



      My question:




      Prove that $f_0$ have a uniqueness continuation $f$ on space $m$ with respecting the norm, i.e
      $$forall x in c_0, f(x) = f_0(x)quad text{and}quad ||f_0|| = ||f||.$$




      The Hahn-Banach theorem guarantees the existence of such a continuation, but not its uniqueness. I tried to figure out some properties of the space conjugate to $c_0$. I proved that $c_0^* cong l^1$. Having proved this, I saw how functionals on $c_0$ looks like. Then I proved that $(l^1)^* cong m$ and saw how functionals on $l^1$ looks like. This is good, because in these spaces I cannot use the Riesz theorem, but, as I said, in the process of the proof I obtained the general form of functionals on these spaces.



      But further, I do not know what to do. How to use this information? Or maybe there are some tricky lemmas or theorems that give information about the uniqueness of the continuation?



      Could you tell me what to do next? Thanks in advance!










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I have a continuous linear functional $f_0 in c_0^*$ where



      $$c_0 = lbrace{x: (x_1, dots, x_n, dots)|lim_{nrightarrowinfty}x_n = 0rbrace} subset m = lbrace{x: (x_1, dots, x_n, dots)|sup_{ninmathbb{N}}|x_n| < inftyrbrace}$$



      My question:




      Prove that $f_0$ have a uniqueness continuation $f$ on space $m$ with respecting the norm, i.e
      $$forall x in c_0, f(x) = f_0(x)quad text{and}quad ||f_0|| = ||f||.$$




      The Hahn-Banach theorem guarantees the existence of such a continuation, but not its uniqueness. I tried to figure out some properties of the space conjugate to $c_0$. I proved that $c_0^* cong l^1$. Having proved this, I saw how functionals on $c_0$ looks like. Then I proved that $(l^1)^* cong m$ and saw how functionals on $l^1$ looks like. This is good, because in these spaces I cannot use the Riesz theorem, but, as I said, in the process of the proof I obtained the general form of functionals on these spaces.



      But further, I do not know what to do. How to use this information? Or maybe there are some tricky lemmas or theorems that give information about the uniqueness of the continuation?



      Could you tell me what to do next? Thanks in advance!







      functional-analysis lp-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 24 at 11:24









      Andrews

      1,3012423




      1,3012423










      asked Mar 24 at 10:47









      mathmaniacmathmaniac

      284116




      284116






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2





          +50







          $begingroup$

          $f_0$ can be written as $xmapsto sum a_nx_n$ for $xin c_0.$ We can define an extension $fin m^*$ by $f(x)=sum a_nx_n$ for $xin m.$



          Consider a $gin m^*$ such that $g(x)=f(x)=f_0(x)$ for $xin c_0.$ Suppose $g(x)>f(x)$ for some $xin m$ with $|x|_infty=1.$ Define sequences $y^nin m$ by $y^n_t=x_t$ for $t>n$ and $y^n_t=mathrm{sgn}(a_t)$ for $tleq n.$ Then $|y^n|=1$ and $f(y^n)to sum |a_n|=|f|.$ But $x-y^nin c_0,$ so $g(y^n)=f(y^n)+g(x)-f(x)to |f|+g(x)-f(x)>|f|.$ If $|g|=|f|$ then $g(x)leq f(x)$ for all $xin m$; applying this to $-x$ as well gives $g(x)=f(x).$





          It is possible to use the Riesz representation theorem. Bounded functions on $mathbb N$ extend to continuous functions on the Stone–Čech compactification $betamathbb N.$ We can split any measure on $beta mathbb N$ into a measure on the open subset $mathbb N$ and a measure on the closed subset $betamathbb Nsetminus N.$ We can formalize this as follows.



          For a locally compact topological space $X,$
          let $C(X)$ denote the Banach space of continuous functions on $X$ with sup norm, and let $C_0(X)subseteq C(X)$ denote the subspace of functions $f$ vanishing at infinity: ${xin X:|f(x)|geq epsilon}$ is compact for each $epsilon>0.$
          Let $mathrm{Meas}(X)$ denote the Banach space of finite regular Borel measures on $X,$ with total variation norm. The "Riesz-Markov theorem" says



          $$C_0(X)^*cong mathrm{Meas}(X)$$



          So
          $$c_0^*cong C_0(mathbb N)cong mathrm{Meas}(mathbb N)$$
          $$m^*cong C(mathbb N)cong C(betamathbb N)cong C_0(betamathbb N)cong mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb N)$$



          A measure $muinmathrm{Meas}(X)$ is specified by a function $mathcal B(X)tomathbb R$ where $mathcal B(X)$ is the set of Borel sets in $X.$ Given $muinmathrm{Meas}(betamathbb N),$ restricting the domain to $mathcal B(mathbb N)$ gives a measure $mu'$ on $mathbb N.$ Similarly, restricting the domain to $mathcal B(betamathbb Nsetminusmathbb N)$ gives a measure $mu''$ on $betamathbb Nsetminus mathbb N.$ And $mu$ can be recovered from these restrictions: $mu(B)=mu'(Bcapmathbb N)+mu''(Bsetminusmathbb N).$ I think it is easy to show these measures are regular if $mu$ is. In this way we get an isomorphism



          $$mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb N)cong mathrm{Meas}(mathbb N)oplus_1mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb Nsetminus mathbb N)$$



          where $oplus_1$ denotes $ell_1$ direct sum of Banach spaces.
          Combining these isomorphisms gives $$m^*cong c_0^*oplus_1mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb Nsetminus mathbb N)$$



          The first component $m^*to c_0^*$ of this isomorphism is the same as the usual map (given by precomposition by the inclusion $c_0to m$). So $fin m^*$ is an extension of $f_0in c_0^*$ if and only if $f$ gets mapped to $(f_0,nu)$ under this isomorphism, for some $nu.$
          Note $|f|=|(f_0,nu)|=|f_0|+|nu|.$ So $|f|=|f_0|$ if and only if $|nu|=0.$ This means there is a unique extension $f$ of $f_0$ with $|f|=|f_0|.$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            What you call obvious in the paragraph on measures is not at all obvious to me. Could you explain the whole chain of isomorphisms and the directly “obvious” statement? Can you write the answer in more detail? I would be very grateful.
            $endgroup$
            – mathmaniac
            Mar 30 at 13:26










          • $begingroup$
            @mathmaniac: I've added some more detail, but really this was just an aside that it is possible to use the Riesz representation.
            $endgroup$
            – Dap
            Mar 31 at 9:25










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much!
            $endgroup$
            – mathmaniac
            Mar 31 at 9:44










          • $begingroup$
            @Dap, sorry, could you describe the first part of the answer in more detail (the one before the discussion on the measure)? Thank you very much!
            $endgroup$
            – uber42
            Mar 31 at 10:32












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3160389%2fthe-uniqueness-of-the-continuation-of-the-functional%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2





          +50







          $begingroup$

          $f_0$ can be written as $xmapsto sum a_nx_n$ for $xin c_0.$ We can define an extension $fin m^*$ by $f(x)=sum a_nx_n$ for $xin m.$



          Consider a $gin m^*$ such that $g(x)=f(x)=f_0(x)$ for $xin c_0.$ Suppose $g(x)>f(x)$ for some $xin m$ with $|x|_infty=1.$ Define sequences $y^nin m$ by $y^n_t=x_t$ for $t>n$ and $y^n_t=mathrm{sgn}(a_t)$ for $tleq n.$ Then $|y^n|=1$ and $f(y^n)to sum |a_n|=|f|.$ But $x-y^nin c_0,$ so $g(y^n)=f(y^n)+g(x)-f(x)to |f|+g(x)-f(x)>|f|.$ If $|g|=|f|$ then $g(x)leq f(x)$ for all $xin m$; applying this to $-x$ as well gives $g(x)=f(x).$





          It is possible to use the Riesz representation theorem. Bounded functions on $mathbb N$ extend to continuous functions on the Stone–Čech compactification $betamathbb N.$ We can split any measure on $beta mathbb N$ into a measure on the open subset $mathbb N$ and a measure on the closed subset $betamathbb Nsetminus N.$ We can formalize this as follows.



          For a locally compact topological space $X,$
          let $C(X)$ denote the Banach space of continuous functions on $X$ with sup norm, and let $C_0(X)subseteq C(X)$ denote the subspace of functions $f$ vanishing at infinity: ${xin X:|f(x)|geq epsilon}$ is compact for each $epsilon>0.$
          Let $mathrm{Meas}(X)$ denote the Banach space of finite regular Borel measures on $X,$ with total variation norm. The "Riesz-Markov theorem" says



          $$C_0(X)^*cong mathrm{Meas}(X)$$



          So
          $$c_0^*cong C_0(mathbb N)cong mathrm{Meas}(mathbb N)$$
          $$m^*cong C(mathbb N)cong C(betamathbb N)cong C_0(betamathbb N)cong mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb N)$$



          A measure $muinmathrm{Meas}(X)$ is specified by a function $mathcal B(X)tomathbb R$ where $mathcal B(X)$ is the set of Borel sets in $X.$ Given $muinmathrm{Meas}(betamathbb N),$ restricting the domain to $mathcal B(mathbb N)$ gives a measure $mu'$ on $mathbb N.$ Similarly, restricting the domain to $mathcal B(betamathbb Nsetminusmathbb N)$ gives a measure $mu''$ on $betamathbb Nsetminus mathbb N.$ And $mu$ can be recovered from these restrictions: $mu(B)=mu'(Bcapmathbb N)+mu''(Bsetminusmathbb N).$ I think it is easy to show these measures are regular if $mu$ is. In this way we get an isomorphism



          $$mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb N)cong mathrm{Meas}(mathbb N)oplus_1mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb Nsetminus mathbb N)$$



          where $oplus_1$ denotes $ell_1$ direct sum of Banach spaces.
          Combining these isomorphisms gives $$m^*cong c_0^*oplus_1mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb Nsetminus mathbb N)$$



          The first component $m^*to c_0^*$ of this isomorphism is the same as the usual map (given by precomposition by the inclusion $c_0to m$). So $fin m^*$ is an extension of $f_0in c_0^*$ if and only if $f$ gets mapped to $(f_0,nu)$ under this isomorphism, for some $nu.$
          Note $|f|=|(f_0,nu)|=|f_0|+|nu|.$ So $|f|=|f_0|$ if and only if $|nu|=0.$ This means there is a unique extension $f$ of $f_0$ with $|f|=|f_0|.$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            What you call obvious in the paragraph on measures is not at all obvious to me. Could you explain the whole chain of isomorphisms and the directly “obvious” statement? Can you write the answer in more detail? I would be very grateful.
            $endgroup$
            – mathmaniac
            Mar 30 at 13:26










          • $begingroup$
            @mathmaniac: I've added some more detail, but really this was just an aside that it is possible to use the Riesz representation.
            $endgroup$
            – Dap
            Mar 31 at 9:25










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much!
            $endgroup$
            – mathmaniac
            Mar 31 at 9:44










          • $begingroup$
            @Dap, sorry, could you describe the first part of the answer in more detail (the one before the discussion on the measure)? Thank you very much!
            $endgroup$
            – uber42
            Mar 31 at 10:32
















          2





          +50







          $begingroup$

          $f_0$ can be written as $xmapsto sum a_nx_n$ for $xin c_0.$ We can define an extension $fin m^*$ by $f(x)=sum a_nx_n$ for $xin m.$



          Consider a $gin m^*$ such that $g(x)=f(x)=f_0(x)$ for $xin c_0.$ Suppose $g(x)>f(x)$ for some $xin m$ with $|x|_infty=1.$ Define sequences $y^nin m$ by $y^n_t=x_t$ for $t>n$ and $y^n_t=mathrm{sgn}(a_t)$ for $tleq n.$ Then $|y^n|=1$ and $f(y^n)to sum |a_n|=|f|.$ But $x-y^nin c_0,$ so $g(y^n)=f(y^n)+g(x)-f(x)to |f|+g(x)-f(x)>|f|.$ If $|g|=|f|$ then $g(x)leq f(x)$ for all $xin m$; applying this to $-x$ as well gives $g(x)=f(x).$





          It is possible to use the Riesz representation theorem. Bounded functions on $mathbb N$ extend to continuous functions on the Stone–Čech compactification $betamathbb N.$ We can split any measure on $beta mathbb N$ into a measure on the open subset $mathbb N$ and a measure on the closed subset $betamathbb Nsetminus N.$ We can formalize this as follows.



          For a locally compact topological space $X,$
          let $C(X)$ denote the Banach space of continuous functions on $X$ with sup norm, and let $C_0(X)subseteq C(X)$ denote the subspace of functions $f$ vanishing at infinity: ${xin X:|f(x)|geq epsilon}$ is compact for each $epsilon>0.$
          Let $mathrm{Meas}(X)$ denote the Banach space of finite regular Borel measures on $X,$ with total variation norm. The "Riesz-Markov theorem" says



          $$C_0(X)^*cong mathrm{Meas}(X)$$



          So
          $$c_0^*cong C_0(mathbb N)cong mathrm{Meas}(mathbb N)$$
          $$m^*cong C(mathbb N)cong C(betamathbb N)cong C_0(betamathbb N)cong mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb N)$$



          A measure $muinmathrm{Meas}(X)$ is specified by a function $mathcal B(X)tomathbb R$ where $mathcal B(X)$ is the set of Borel sets in $X.$ Given $muinmathrm{Meas}(betamathbb N),$ restricting the domain to $mathcal B(mathbb N)$ gives a measure $mu'$ on $mathbb N.$ Similarly, restricting the domain to $mathcal B(betamathbb Nsetminusmathbb N)$ gives a measure $mu''$ on $betamathbb Nsetminus mathbb N.$ And $mu$ can be recovered from these restrictions: $mu(B)=mu'(Bcapmathbb N)+mu''(Bsetminusmathbb N).$ I think it is easy to show these measures are regular if $mu$ is. In this way we get an isomorphism



          $$mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb N)cong mathrm{Meas}(mathbb N)oplus_1mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb Nsetminus mathbb N)$$



          where $oplus_1$ denotes $ell_1$ direct sum of Banach spaces.
          Combining these isomorphisms gives $$m^*cong c_0^*oplus_1mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb Nsetminus mathbb N)$$



          The first component $m^*to c_0^*$ of this isomorphism is the same as the usual map (given by precomposition by the inclusion $c_0to m$). So $fin m^*$ is an extension of $f_0in c_0^*$ if and only if $f$ gets mapped to $(f_0,nu)$ under this isomorphism, for some $nu.$
          Note $|f|=|(f_0,nu)|=|f_0|+|nu|.$ So $|f|=|f_0|$ if and only if $|nu|=0.$ This means there is a unique extension $f$ of $f_0$ with $|f|=|f_0|.$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            What you call obvious in the paragraph on measures is not at all obvious to me. Could you explain the whole chain of isomorphisms and the directly “obvious” statement? Can you write the answer in more detail? I would be very grateful.
            $endgroup$
            – mathmaniac
            Mar 30 at 13:26










          • $begingroup$
            @mathmaniac: I've added some more detail, but really this was just an aside that it is possible to use the Riesz representation.
            $endgroup$
            – Dap
            Mar 31 at 9:25










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much!
            $endgroup$
            – mathmaniac
            Mar 31 at 9:44










          • $begingroup$
            @Dap, sorry, could you describe the first part of the answer in more detail (the one before the discussion on the measure)? Thank you very much!
            $endgroup$
            – uber42
            Mar 31 at 10:32














          2





          +50







          2





          +50



          2




          +50



          $begingroup$

          $f_0$ can be written as $xmapsto sum a_nx_n$ for $xin c_0.$ We can define an extension $fin m^*$ by $f(x)=sum a_nx_n$ for $xin m.$



          Consider a $gin m^*$ such that $g(x)=f(x)=f_0(x)$ for $xin c_0.$ Suppose $g(x)>f(x)$ for some $xin m$ with $|x|_infty=1.$ Define sequences $y^nin m$ by $y^n_t=x_t$ for $t>n$ and $y^n_t=mathrm{sgn}(a_t)$ for $tleq n.$ Then $|y^n|=1$ and $f(y^n)to sum |a_n|=|f|.$ But $x-y^nin c_0,$ so $g(y^n)=f(y^n)+g(x)-f(x)to |f|+g(x)-f(x)>|f|.$ If $|g|=|f|$ then $g(x)leq f(x)$ for all $xin m$; applying this to $-x$ as well gives $g(x)=f(x).$





          It is possible to use the Riesz representation theorem. Bounded functions on $mathbb N$ extend to continuous functions on the Stone–Čech compactification $betamathbb N.$ We can split any measure on $beta mathbb N$ into a measure on the open subset $mathbb N$ and a measure on the closed subset $betamathbb Nsetminus N.$ We can formalize this as follows.



          For a locally compact topological space $X,$
          let $C(X)$ denote the Banach space of continuous functions on $X$ with sup norm, and let $C_0(X)subseteq C(X)$ denote the subspace of functions $f$ vanishing at infinity: ${xin X:|f(x)|geq epsilon}$ is compact for each $epsilon>0.$
          Let $mathrm{Meas}(X)$ denote the Banach space of finite regular Borel measures on $X,$ with total variation norm. The "Riesz-Markov theorem" says



          $$C_0(X)^*cong mathrm{Meas}(X)$$



          So
          $$c_0^*cong C_0(mathbb N)cong mathrm{Meas}(mathbb N)$$
          $$m^*cong C(mathbb N)cong C(betamathbb N)cong C_0(betamathbb N)cong mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb N)$$



          A measure $muinmathrm{Meas}(X)$ is specified by a function $mathcal B(X)tomathbb R$ where $mathcal B(X)$ is the set of Borel sets in $X.$ Given $muinmathrm{Meas}(betamathbb N),$ restricting the domain to $mathcal B(mathbb N)$ gives a measure $mu'$ on $mathbb N.$ Similarly, restricting the domain to $mathcal B(betamathbb Nsetminusmathbb N)$ gives a measure $mu''$ on $betamathbb Nsetminus mathbb N.$ And $mu$ can be recovered from these restrictions: $mu(B)=mu'(Bcapmathbb N)+mu''(Bsetminusmathbb N).$ I think it is easy to show these measures are regular if $mu$ is. In this way we get an isomorphism



          $$mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb N)cong mathrm{Meas}(mathbb N)oplus_1mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb Nsetminus mathbb N)$$



          where $oplus_1$ denotes $ell_1$ direct sum of Banach spaces.
          Combining these isomorphisms gives $$m^*cong c_0^*oplus_1mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb Nsetminus mathbb N)$$



          The first component $m^*to c_0^*$ of this isomorphism is the same as the usual map (given by precomposition by the inclusion $c_0to m$). So $fin m^*$ is an extension of $f_0in c_0^*$ if and only if $f$ gets mapped to $(f_0,nu)$ under this isomorphism, for some $nu.$
          Note $|f|=|(f_0,nu)|=|f_0|+|nu|.$ So $|f|=|f_0|$ if and only if $|nu|=0.$ This means there is a unique extension $f$ of $f_0$ with $|f|=|f_0|.$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          $f_0$ can be written as $xmapsto sum a_nx_n$ for $xin c_0.$ We can define an extension $fin m^*$ by $f(x)=sum a_nx_n$ for $xin m.$



          Consider a $gin m^*$ such that $g(x)=f(x)=f_0(x)$ for $xin c_0.$ Suppose $g(x)>f(x)$ for some $xin m$ with $|x|_infty=1.$ Define sequences $y^nin m$ by $y^n_t=x_t$ for $t>n$ and $y^n_t=mathrm{sgn}(a_t)$ for $tleq n.$ Then $|y^n|=1$ and $f(y^n)to sum |a_n|=|f|.$ But $x-y^nin c_0,$ so $g(y^n)=f(y^n)+g(x)-f(x)to |f|+g(x)-f(x)>|f|.$ If $|g|=|f|$ then $g(x)leq f(x)$ for all $xin m$; applying this to $-x$ as well gives $g(x)=f(x).$





          It is possible to use the Riesz representation theorem. Bounded functions on $mathbb N$ extend to continuous functions on the Stone–Čech compactification $betamathbb N.$ We can split any measure on $beta mathbb N$ into a measure on the open subset $mathbb N$ and a measure on the closed subset $betamathbb Nsetminus N.$ We can formalize this as follows.



          For a locally compact topological space $X,$
          let $C(X)$ denote the Banach space of continuous functions on $X$ with sup norm, and let $C_0(X)subseteq C(X)$ denote the subspace of functions $f$ vanishing at infinity: ${xin X:|f(x)|geq epsilon}$ is compact for each $epsilon>0.$
          Let $mathrm{Meas}(X)$ denote the Banach space of finite regular Borel measures on $X,$ with total variation norm. The "Riesz-Markov theorem" says



          $$C_0(X)^*cong mathrm{Meas}(X)$$



          So
          $$c_0^*cong C_0(mathbb N)cong mathrm{Meas}(mathbb N)$$
          $$m^*cong C(mathbb N)cong C(betamathbb N)cong C_0(betamathbb N)cong mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb N)$$



          A measure $muinmathrm{Meas}(X)$ is specified by a function $mathcal B(X)tomathbb R$ where $mathcal B(X)$ is the set of Borel sets in $X.$ Given $muinmathrm{Meas}(betamathbb N),$ restricting the domain to $mathcal B(mathbb N)$ gives a measure $mu'$ on $mathbb N.$ Similarly, restricting the domain to $mathcal B(betamathbb Nsetminusmathbb N)$ gives a measure $mu''$ on $betamathbb Nsetminus mathbb N.$ And $mu$ can be recovered from these restrictions: $mu(B)=mu'(Bcapmathbb N)+mu''(Bsetminusmathbb N).$ I think it is easy to show these measures are regular if $mu$ is. In this way we get an isomorphism



          $$mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb N)cong mathrm{Meas}(mathbb N)oplus_1mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb Nsetminus mathbb N)$$



          where $oplus_1$ denotes $ell_1$ direct sum of Banach spaces.
          Combining these isomorphisms gives $$m^*cong c_0^*oplus_1mathrm{Meas}(betamathbb Nsetminus mathbb N)$$



          The first component $m^*to c_0^*$ of this isomorphism is the same as the usual map (given by precomposition by the inclusion $c_0to m$). So $fin m^*$ is an extension of $f_0in c_0^*$ if and only if $f$ gets mapped to $(f_0,nu)$ under this isomorphism, for some $nu.$
          Note $|f|=|(f_0,nu)|=|f_0|+|nu|.$ So $|f|=|f_0|$ if and only if $|nu|=0.$ This means there is a unique extension $f$ of $f_0$ with $|f|=|f_0|.$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 31 at 10:03

























          answered Mar 28 at 19:49









          DapDap

          20.1k842




          20.1k842












          • $begingroup$
            What you call obvious in the paragraph on measures is not at all obvious to me. Could you explain the whole chain of isomorphisms and the directly “obvious” statement? Can you write the answer in more detail? I would be very grateful.
            $endgroup$
            – mathmaniac
            Mar 30 at 13:26










          • $begingroup$
            @mathmaniac: I've added some more detail, but really this was just an aside that it is possible to use the Riesz representation.
            $endgroup$
            – Dap
            Mar 31 at 9:25










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much!
            $endgroup$
            – mathmaniac
            Mar 31 at 9:44










          • $begingroup$
            @Dap, sorry, could you describe the first part of the answer in more detail (the one before the discussion on the measure)? Thank you very much!
            $endgroup$
            – uber42
            Mar 31 at 10:32


















          • $begingroup$
            What you call obvious in the paragraph on measures is not at all obvious to me. Could you explain the whole chain of isomorphisms and the directly “obvious” statement? Can you write the answer in more detail? I would be very grateful.
            $endgroup$
            – mathmaniac
            Mar 30 at 13:26










          • $begingroup$
            @mathmaniac: I've added some more detail, but really this was just an aside that it is possible to use the Riesz representation.
            $endgroup$
            – Dap
            Mar 31 at 9:25










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you very much!
            $endgroup$
            – mathmaniac
            Mar 31 at 9:44










          • $begingroup$
            @Dap, sorry, could you describe the first part of the answer in more detail (the one before the discussion on the measure)? Thank you very much!
            $endgroup$
            – uber42
            Mar 31 at 10:32
















          $begingroup$
          What you call obvious in the paragraph on measures is not at all obvious to me. Could you explain the whole chain of isomorphisms and the directly “obvious” statement? Can you write the answer in more detail? I would be very grateful.
          $endgroup$
          – mathmaniac
          Mar 30 at 13:26




          $begingroup$
          What you call obvious in the paragraph on measures is not at all obvious to me. Could you explain the whole chain of isomorphisms and the directly “obvious” statement? Can you write the answer in more detail? I would be very grateful.
          $endgroup$
          – mathmaniac
          Mar 30 at 13:26












          $begingroup$
          @mathmaniac: I've added some more detail, but really this was just an aside that it is possible to use the Riesz representation.
          $endgroup$
          – Dap
          Mar 31 at 9:25




          $begingroup$
          @mathmaniac: I've added some more detail, but really this was just an aside that it is possible to use the Riesz representation.
          $endgroup$
          – Dap
          Mar 31 at 9:25












          $begingroup$
          Thank you very much!
          $endgroup$
          – mathmaniac
          Mar 31 at 9:44




          $begingroup$
          Thank you very much!
          $endgroup$
          – mathmaniac
          Mar 31 at 9:44












          $begingroup$
          @Dap, sorry, could you describe the first part of the answer in more detail (the one before the discussion on the measure)? Thank you very much!
          $endgroup$
          – uber42
          Mar 31 at 10:32




          $begingroup$
          @Dap, sorry, could you describe the first part of the answer in more detail (the one before the discussion on the measure)? Thank you very much!
          $endgroup$
          – uber42
          Mar 31 at 10:32


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3160389%2fthe-uniqueness-of-the-continuation-of-the-functional%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          六本木駅

          Integral that is continuous and looks like it converges to a geometric seriesTesting if a geometric series converges by taking limit to infinitySummation of arithmetic-geometric series of higher orderGeometric series with polynomial exponentHow to Recognize a Geometric SeriesShowing an integral equality with series over the integersDiscontinuity of a series of continuous functionsReasons why a Series ConvergesSum of infinite geometric series with two terms in summationUsing geometric series for computing IntegralsLimit of geometric series sum when $r = 1$

          Joseph Lister