Why aren't these two solutions equivalent? Combinatorics problem Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Different answers from different formulations of combinatorics problemNice problem of combinatorics..Trouble Understanding this Combinatorics ProblemThe number of ways to distribute groups between professors. Combinatorics. Surjective problem?Seating 10 people in a circular tableCounting problem combinatorics with employees of a faculty.Committee Forming Combinatorics ProblemA combinatorics problem with positionsCard combinatorics - two answersWhere is my solution wrong for this combinatorics problem?
Why "Go Out and Learn"
Why does BitLocker not use RSA?
Putting Ant-Man on house arrest
lm and glm function in R
What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management
Converting a text document with special format to Pandas DataFrame
Marquee sign letters
Can a Knight grant Knighthood to another?
When speaking, how do you change your mind mid-sentence?
Should man-made satellites feature an intelligent inverted "cow catcher"?
Network Switch Upgrade Planning questions
How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?
Does using the inspiration rules for character defects tend to encourage players to display MGS?
Why doesn't the university give past final exams' answers?
Trying to enter the Fox's den
Recursive calls to a function - why is the address of the parameter passed to it lowering with each call?
How do I deal with an erroneously large refund?
“Since the train was delayed for more than an hour, passengers were given a full refund.” – Why is there no article before “passengers”?
Why aren't these two solutions equivalent? Combinatorics problem
Protagonist's race is hidden - should I reveal it?
xkeyval -- read keys from file
Can this water damage be explained by lack of gutters and grading issues?
What helicopter has the most rotor blades?
Are there any AGPL-style licences that require source code modifications to be public?
Why aren't these two solutions equivalent? Combinatorics problem
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Different answers from different formulations of combinatorics problemNice problem of combinatorics..Trouble Understanding this Combinatorics ProblemThe number of ways to distribute groups between professors. Combinatorics. Surjective problem?Seating 10 people in a circular tableCounting problem combinatorics with employees of a faculty.Committee Forming Combinatorics ProblemA combinatorics problem with positionsCard combinatorics - two answersWhere is my solution wrong for this combinatorics problem?
$begingroup$
I was given the following fact: there is a set $S$ of $11$ people, among which there are $4$ professors and $7$ students,
$S=p_1, p_2, p_3,p_4, s_1, s_2,...,s_7$
We are requested to form from it a group of $5$ people, and we must have at least 3 professors.
I find that the two answers I will expose should be equivalent, but are not, and I can't figure out why.
Answer 1
The group of $5$ people must have at least $3$ professors. This means that three of the $5$ people will necessarily be a subset of $S_p$, the subset of $S$ containing only the professors. There are $binom43$ subsets of $S_p$, and therefore I have $binom43$ alternatives for the three professors that must be in the group.
Now that I've made sure this $3$ professors are in the group, I have $11-3=8$ people left to choose from. The remaining two persons of the group can either be professors or students, so I can pick any of those $8$. So for the two remaining places I have $binom82$ alternatives. At last, I have $binom43 binom82 = 112$ ways of forming a group of $5$ people in which there will definitely be at least $3$ professors.
Answer 2
There are $4$ professors and, in my group of $5$ people, I must have at least $3$ of them. So I'll either have $3$ or $4$ professors.
If I have $3$ professors, I'll choose them from the $4$ professors, and fill the remaining two places with $2$ of $7$ students. This is $binom43 binom72$.
If on the other hand I have $4$ professors, I'll have $binom44$ alternatives for choosing them, and $binom71$ ways of choosing a student for the remaining last place.
So at last there are $binom43binom72+binom44binom71 = 91$ ways of making the group.
Doubt
As you can see, the answers are different. Answer $1$ says there are $112$ ways of making the group; answer two says $91$. However, both reasonings seem okay to me and I can't see why should they differ nor where. Perhaps someone can clear this up for me.
combinatorics discrete-mathematics problem-solving
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was given the following fact: there is a set $S$ of $11$ people, among which there are $4$ professors and $7$ students,
$S=p_1, p_2, p_3,p_4, s_1, s_2,...,s_7$
We are requested to form from it a group of $5$ people, and we must have at least 3 professors.
I find that the two answers I will expose should be equivalent, but are not, and I can't figure out why.
Answer 1
The group of $5$ people must have at least $3$ professors. This means that three of the $5$ people will necessarily be a subset of $S_p$, the subset of $S$ containing only the professors. There are $binom43$ subsets of $S_p$, and therefore I have $binom43$ alternatives for the three professors that must be in the group.
Now that I've made sure this $3$ professors are in the group, I have $11-3=8$ people left to choose from. The remaining two persons of the group can either be professors or students, so I can pick any of those $8$. So for the two remaining places I have $binom82$ alternatives. At last, I have $binom43 binom82 = 112$ ways of forming a group of $5$ people in which there will definitely be at least $3$ professors.
Answer 2
There are $4$ professors and, in my group of $5$ people, I must have at least $3$ of them. So I'll either have $3$ or $4$ professors.
If I have $3$ professors, I'll choose them from the $4$ professors, and fill the remaining two places with $2$ of $7$ students. This is $binom43 binom72$.
If on the other hand I have $4$ professors, I'll have $binom44$ alternatives for choosing them, and $binom71$ ways of choosing a student for the remaining last place.
So at last there are $binom43binom72+binom44binom71 = 91$ ways of making the group.
Doubt
As you can see, the answers are different. Answer $1$ says there are $112$ ways of making the group; answer two says $91$. However, both reasonings seem okay to me and I can't see why should they differ nor where. Perhaps someone can clear this up for me.
combinatorics discrete-mathematics problem-solving
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was given the following fact: there is a set $S$ of $11$ people, among which there are $4$ professors and $7$ students,
$S=p_1, p_2, p_3,p_4, s_1, s_2,...,s_7$
We are requested to form from it a group of $5$ people, and we must have at least 3 professors.
I find that the two answers I will expose should be equivalent, but are not, and I can't figure out why.
Answer 1
The group of $5$ people must have at least $3$ professors. This means that three of the $5$ people will necessarily be a subset of $S_p$, the subset of $S$ containing only the professors. There are $binom43$ subsets of $S_p$, and therefore I have $binom43$ alternatives for the three professors that must be in the group.
Now that I've made sure this $3$ professors are in the group, I have $11-3=8$ people left to choose from. The remaining two persons of the group can either be professors or students, so I can pick any of those $8$. So for the two remaining places I have $binom82$ alternatives. At last, I have $binom43 binom82 = 112$ ways of forming a group of $5$ people in which there will definitely be at least $3$ professors.
Answer 2
There are $4$ professors and, in my group of $5$ people, I must have at least $3$ of them. So I'll either have $3$ or $4$ professors.
If I have $3$ professors, I'll choose them from the $4$ professors, and fill the remaining two places with $2$ of $7$ students. This is $binom43 binom72$.
If on the other hand I have $4$ professors, I'll have $binom44$ alternatives for choosing them, and $binom71$ ways of choosing a student for the remaining last place.
So at last there are $binom43binom72+binom44binom71 = 91$ ways of making the group.
Doubt
As you can see, the answers are different. Answer $1$ says there are $112$ ways of making the group; answer two says $91$. However, both reasonings seem okay to me and I can't see why should they differ nor where. Perhaps someone can clear this up for me.
combinatorics discrete-mathematics problem-solving
$endgroup$
I was given the following fact: there is a set $S$ of $11$ people, among which there are $4$ professors and $7$ students,
$S=p_1, p_2, p_3,p_4, s_1, s_2,...,s_7$
We are requested to form from it a group of $5$ people, and we must have at least 3 professors.
I find that the two answers I will expose should be equivalent, but are not, and I can't figure out why.
Answer 1
The group of $5$ people must have at least $3$ professors. This means that three of the $5$ people will necessarily be a subset of $S_p$, the subset of $S$ containing only the professors. There are $binom43$ subsets of $S_p$, and therefore I have $binom43$ alternatives for the three professors that must be in the group.
Now that I've made sure this $3$ professors are in the group, I have $11-3=8$ people left to choose from. The remaining two persons of the group can either be professors or students, so I can pick any of those $8$. So for the two remaining places I have $binom82$ alternatives. At last, I have $binom43 binom82 = 112$ ways of forming a group of $5$ people in which there will definitely be at least $3$ professors.
Answer 2
There are $4$ professors and, in my group of $5$ people, I must have at least $3$ of them. So I'll either have $3$ or $4$ professors.
If I have $3$ professors, I'll choose them from the $4$ professors, and fill the remaining two places with $2$ of $7$ students. This is $binom43 binom72$.
If on the other hand I have $4$ professors, I'll have $binom44$ alternatives for choosing them, and $binom71$ ways of choosing a student for the remaining last place.
So at last there are $binom43binom72+binom44binom71 = 91$ ways of making the group.
Doubt
As you can see, the answers are different. Answer $1$ says there are $112$ ways of making the group; answer two says $91$. However, both reasonings seem okay to me and I can't see why should they differ nor where. Perhaps someone can clear this up for me.
combinatorics discrete-mathematics problem-solving
combinatorics discrete-mathematics problem-solving
edited 3 hours ago
N. F. Taussig
45.5k103358
45.5k103358
asked 3 hours ago
AngelusSilesiusAngelusSilesius
1137
1137
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your second solution is the correct one.
Your first solution is incorrect because you overcount the scenarios where a professor is picked in the second step.
The outcome where you pick the first three professors in the first step followed by the fourth professor in the second step: $p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4,s_1$ is also counted where you picked the last three professors in the first step and the first professor in the second step: $p_2,p_3,p_4,p_1,s_1$. These outcomes should be considered the same however since in both scenarios you have the same five people selected.
Be careful not to overcount things with multiplication principle. Objects selected in one step are treated differently than objects selected in a later step.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Of course! Now I understand. Thank you for answering my doubt.
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first answer is wrong. It overestimates the count by double-counting the four-professors solutions. This is because each can begin with three of the four in four different ways. Note that $$binom43binom72+4binom44binom71=112.$$Although "double counting" referred above to a fallacy, it's also the name of a valid, useful technique one should be happy to use.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is right, thank you for taking the trouble and answering my doubt!
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3197429%2fwhy-arent-these-two-solutions-equivalent-combinatorics-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your second solution is the correct one.
Your first solution is incorrect because you overcount the scenarios where a professor is picked in the second step.
The outcome where you pick the first three professors in the first step followed by the fourth professor in the second step: $p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4,s_1$ is also counted where you picked the last three professors in the first step and the first professor in the second step: $p_2,p_3,p_4,p_1,s_1$. These outcomes should be considered the same however since in both scenarios you have the same five people selected.
Be careful not to overcount things with multiplication principle. Objects selected in one step are treated differently than objects selected in a later step.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Of course! Now I understand. Thank you for answering my doubt.
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your second solution is the correct one.
Your first solution is incorrect because you overcount the scenarios where a professor is picked in the second step.
The outcome where you pick the first three professors in the first step followed by the fourth professor in the second step: $p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4,s_1$ is also counted where you picked the last three professors in the first step and the first professor in the second step: $p_2,p_3,p_4,p_1,s_1$. These outcomes should be considered the same however since in both scenarios you have the same five people selected.
Be careful not to overcount things with multiplication principle. Objects selected in one step are treated differently than objects selected in a later step.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Of course! Now I understand. Thank you for answering my doubt.
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your second solution is the correct one.
Your first solution is incorrect because you overcount the scenarios where a professor is picked in the second step.
The outcome where you pick the first three professors in the first step followed by the fourth professor in the second step: $p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4,s_1$ is also counted where you picked the last three professors in the first step and the first professor in the second step: $p_2,p_3,p_4,p_1,s_1$. These outcomes should be considered the same however since in both scenarios you have the same five people selected.
Be careful not to overcount things with multiplication principle. Objects selected in one step are treated differently than objects selected in a later step.
$endgroup$
Your second solution is the correct one.
Your first solution is incorrect because you overcount the scenarios where a professor is picked in the second step.
The outcome where you pick the first three professors in the first step followed by the fourth professor in the second step: $p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4,s_1$ is also counted where you picked the last three professors in the first step and the first professor in the second step: $p_2,p_3,p_4,p_1,s_1$. These outcomes should be considered the same however since in both scenarios you have the same five people selected.
Be careful not to overcount things with multiplication principle. Objects selected in one step are treated differently than objects selected in a later step.
answered 3 hours ago
JMoravitzJMoravitz
49.5k44092
49.5k44092
$begingroup$
Of course! Now I understand. Thank you for answering my doubt.
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Of course! Now I understand. Thank you for answering my doubt.
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Of course! Now I understand. Thank you for answering my doubt.
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Of course! Now I understand. Thank you for answering my doubt.
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first answer is wrong. It overestimates the count by double-counting the four-professors solutions. This is because each can begin with three of the four in four different ways. Note that $$binom43binom72+4binom44binom71=112.$$Although "double counting" referred above to a fallacy, it's also the name of a valid, useful technique one should be happy to use.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is right, thank you for taking the trouble and answering my doubt!
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first answer is wrong. It overestimates the count by double-counting the four-professors solutions. This is because each can begin with three of the four in four different ways. Note that $$binom43binom72+4binom44binom71=112.$$Although "double counting" referred above to a fallacy, it's also the name of a valid, useful technique one should be happy to use.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This is right, thank you for taking the trouble and answering my doubt!
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first answer is wrong. It overestimates the count by double-counting the four-professors solutions. This is because each can begin with three of the four in four different ways. Note that $$binom43binom72+4binom44binom71=112.$$Although "double counting" referred above to a fallacy, it's also the name of a valid, useful technique one should be happy to use.
$endgroup$
The first answer is wrong. It overestimates the count by double-counting the four-professors solutions. This is because each can begin with three of the four in four different ways. Note that $$binom43binom72+4binom44binom71=112.$$Although "double counting" referred above to a fallacy, it's also the name of a valid, useful technique one should be happy to use.
edited 3 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
J.G.J.G.
34.2k23252
34.2k23252
$begingroup$
This is right, thank you for taking the trouble and answering my doubt!
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is right, thank you for taking the trouble and answering my doubt!
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is right, thank you for taking the trouble and answering my doubt!
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is right, thank you for taking the trouble and answering my doubt!
$endgroup$
– AngelusSilesius
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3197429%2fwhy-arent-these-two-solutions-equivalent-combinatorics-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown