Check if 1-x is completely Monotonic functiona problem on uniform convergence of monotonic increasing...

Is this saw blade faulty?

Reasons for having MCU pin-states default to pull-up/down out of reset

Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached a tenth of the Sun's power?

Started in 1987 vs. Starting in 1987

Why would five hundred and five same as one?

"Marked down as someone wanting to sell shares." What does that mean?

Air travel with refrigerated insulin

Offset in split text content

What is the period/term used describe Giuseppe Arcimboldo's style of painting?

Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions

I keep switching characters, how do I stop?

Mortal danger in mid-grade literature

Capacitor electron flow

Do native speakers use "ultima" and "proxima" frequently in spoken English?

A seasonal riddle

Error in master's thesis, I do not know what to do

Is there any common country to visit for persons holding UK and Schengen visas?

Put the phone down / Put down the phone

Strange behavior in TikZ draw command

How to test the sharpness of a knife?

How do I prevent inappropriate ads from appearing in my game?

Walter Rudin's mathematical analysis: theorem 2.43. Why proof can't work under the perfect set is uncountable.

How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?

How do I lift the insulation blower into the attic?



Check if 1-x is completely Monotonic function


a problem on uniform convergence of monotonic increasing functionDifferentiability of monotonic functionsHow can I tell if a function is a monotonic transformation?Technical name for an almost-monotonic functionShow function is monotonic and if it has maximum or minimum without second derivativeAre there cases where using the definition is easier than using the derivative to study the monotonic behaviour of a function?Monotonicity of $(f circ f)$ and $(f circ f circ f)$ for strictly monotonic $f$Monotonic function is rectificiableProve monotonic function on $mathbb{R}$ under given conditionWhy does a monotonic function always have a positive rate of change?













0












$begingroup$


I had a question about how can I check whether $f(x)=1-x$ is completely monotonic. Could somebody provide a simple example based on this function.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I had a question about how can I check whether $f(x)=1-x$ is completely monotonic. Could somebody provide a simple example based on this function.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I had a question about how can I check whether $f(x)=1-x$ is completely monotonic. Could somebody provide a simple example based on this function.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I had a question about how can I check whether $f(x)=1-x$ is completely monotonic. Could somebody provide a simple example based on this function.







      real-analysis functions derivatives monotone-functions






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 12 at 15:23









      AlexAlex

      115




      115






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          According to this, a completely monotonic function must satisty $$ (-1)^n frac {d^n}{dt^n}f(t)ge0$$ for all nonnegative $n$ and $t>0$; the special case $n=0$ reduces to requiring $f$ non-negative on $(0,infty)$. Which your $f$ clearly does not satisfy.



          The characterization of completely monotone functions as Laplace transforms of non-negative measures is also a tip-off: if $x=2$, say, you would be representing $-1$ as the integral of a non-negative function.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks @kimchi lover. But the above function satisfies $ ( - 1 ) ^ { n } frac { d ^ { n } } { d t ^ { n } } f ( t ) geq 0 $: $(-1)f'(x) = -1 (-1) =1geq0$, $(-1)^2f''(x)=(-1)^2cdot0 =0 geq0$ etc.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex
            Mar 12 at 15:43












          • $begingroup$
            Brilliant! Many thanks @kimchi lover, this explanation is much more clear!
            $endgroup$
            – Alex
            Mar 12 at 16:20











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3145214%2fcheck-if-1-x-is-completely-monotonic-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          According to this, a completely monotonic function must satisty $$ (-1)^n frac {d^n}{dt^n}f(t)ge0$$ for all nonnegative $n$ and $t>0$; the special case $n=0$ reduces to requiring $f$ non-negative on $(0,infty)$. Which your $f$ clearly does not satisfy.



          The characterization of completely monotone functions as Laplace transforms of non-negative measures is also a tip-off: if $x=2$, say, you would be representing $-1$ as the integral of a non-negative function.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks @kimchi lover. But the above function satisfies $ ( - 1 ) ^ { n } frac { d ^ { n } } { d t ^ { n } } f ( t ) geq 0 $: $(-1)f'(x) = -1 (-1) =1geq0$, $(-1)^2f''(x)=(-1)^2cdot0 =0 geq0$ etc.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex
            Mar 12 at 15:43












          • $begingroup$
            Brilliant! Many thanks @kimchi lover, this explanation is much more clear!
            $endgroup$
            – Alex
            Mar 12 at 16:20
















          0












          $begingroup$

          According to this, a completely monotonic function must satisty $$ (-1)^n frac {d^n}{dt^n}f(t)ge0$$ for all nonnegative $n$ and $t>0$; the special case $n=0$ reduces to requiring $f$ non-negative on $(0,infty)$. Which your $f$ clearly does not satisfy.



          The characterization of completely monotone functions as Laplace transforms of non-negative measures is also a tip-off: if $x=2$, say, you would be representing $-1$ as the integral of a non-negative function.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks @kimchi lover. But the above function satisfies $ ( - 1 ) ^ { n } frac { d ^ { n } } { d t ^ { n } } f ( t ) geq 0 $: $(-1)f'(x) = -1 (-1) =1geq0$, $(-1)^2f''(x)=(-1)^2cdot0 =0 geq0$ etc.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex
            Mar 12 at 15:43












          • $begingroup$
            Brilliant! Many thanks @kimchi lover, this explanation is much more clear!
            $endgroup$
            – Alex
            Mar 12 at 16:20














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          According to this, a completely monotonic function must satisty $$ (-1)^n frac {d^n}{dt^n}f(t)ge0$$ for all nonnegative $n$ and $t>0$; the special case $n=0$ reduces to requiring $f$ non-negative on $(0,infty)$. Which your $f$ clearly does not satisfy.



          The characterization of completely monotone functions as Laplace transforms of non-negative measures is also a tip-off: if $x=2$, say, you would be representing $-1$ as the integral of a non-negative function.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          According to this, a completely monotonic function must satisty $$ (-1)^n frac {d^n}{dt^n}f(t)ge0$$ for all nonnegative $n$ and $t>0$; the special case $n=0$ reduces to requiring $f$ non-negative on $(0,infty)$. Which your $f$ clearly does not satisfy.



          The characterization of completely monotone functions as Laplace transforms of non-negative measures is also a tip-off: if $x=2$, say, you would be representing $-1$ as the integral of a non-negative function.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 12 at 16:00

























          answered Mar 12 at 15:40









          kimchi loverkimchi lover

          11.3k31229




          11.3k31229












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks @kimchi lover. But the above function satisfies $ ( - 1 ) ^ { n } frac { d ^ { n } } { d t ^ { n } } f ( t ) geq 0 $: $(-1)f'(x) = -1 (-1) =1geq0$, $(-1)^2f''(x)=(-1)^2cdot0 =0 geq0$ etc.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex
            Mar 12 at 15:43












          • $begingroup$
            Brilliant! Many thanks @kimchi lover, this explanation is much more clear!
            $endgroup$
            – Alex
            Mar 12 at 16:20


















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks @kimchi lover. But the above function satisfies $ ( - 1 ) ^ { n } frac { d ^ { n } } { d t ^ { n } } f ( t ) geq 0 $: $(-1)f'(x) = -1 (-1) =1geq0$, $(-1)^2f''(x)=(-1)^2cdot0 =0 geq0$ etc.
            $endgroup$
            – Alex
            Mar 12 at 15:43












          • $begingroup$
            Brilliant! Many thanks @kimchi lover, this explanation is much more clear!
            $endgroup$
            – Alex
            Mar 12 at 16:20
















          $begingroup$
          Thanks @kimchi lover. But the above function satisfies $ ( - 1 ) ^ { n } frac { d ^ { n } } { d t ^ { n } } f ( t ) geq 0 $: $(-1)f'(x) = -1 (-1) =1geq0$, $(-1)^2f''(x)=(-1)^2cdot0 =0 geq0$ etc.
          $endgroup$
          – Alex
          Mar 12 at 15:43






          $begingroup$
          Thanks @kimchi lover. But the above function satisfies $ ( - 1 ) ^ { n } frac { d ^ { n } } { d t ^ { n } } f ( t ) geq 0 $: $(-1)f'(x) = -1 (-1) =1geq0$, $(-1)^2f''(x)=(-1)^2cdot0 =0 geq0$ etc.
          $endgroup$
          – Alex
          Mar 12 at 15:43














          $begingroup$
          Brilliant! Many thanks @kimchi lover, this explanation is much more clear!
          $endgroup$
          – Alex
          Mar 12 at 16:20




          $begingroup$
          Brilliant! Many thanks @kimchi lover, this explanation is much more clear!
          $endgroup$
          – Alex
          Mar 12 at 16:20


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3145214%2fcheck-if-1-x-is-completely-monotonic-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Nidaros erkebispedøme

          Birsay

          Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...