Continuity on infinityProving uniform continuity on an intervalContinuity of a constant functioncontinuity...
Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?
Trouble reading roman numeral notation with flats
Why is indicated airspeed rather than ground speed used during the takeoff roll?
What can I do if I am asked to learn different programming languages very frequently?
What do the positive and negative (+/-) transmit and receive pins mean on Ethernet cables?
Is divisi notation needed for brass or woodwind in an orchestra?
Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?
What is the tangent at a sharp point on a curve?
A seasonal riddle
Can a Knock spell open the door to Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion?
Highest stage count that are used one right after the other?
Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks
Checking @@ROWCOUNT failing
Should a narrator ever describe things based on a character's view instead of facts?
How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?
Does capillary rise violate hydrostatic paradox?
C++ lambda syntax
Is there a distance limit for minecart tracks?
Non-Borel set in arbitrary metric space
Why does the Persian emissary display a string of crowned skulls?
Offset in split text content
Why is "la Gestapo" feminine?
Index matching algorithm without hash-based data structures?
Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup
Continuity on infinity
Proving uniform continuity on an intervalContinuity of a constant functioncontinuity and uniform continuty of $1/x$Prove that the Rational function $fleft(xright)=frac{pleft(xright)}{qleft(xright)}$ is uniformly continuousProof of uniformly continuous for nth root of x on [0,+∞)Given a continuous function with an asymptote, prove that the function is uniformly continuous.How to prove that $arg: S^1setminus{-1}to (-pi,pi)$ is continuous? (With restrictions.)$f$ be real uniformly continuous function on the bounded set $E$ of $Bbb R$ then $f$ is bounded on $E$“Trick” to finding Delta in proving continuity/uniform continuity?Real Analysis - Uniform continuity
$begingroup$
We have $f: [a.b] rightarrow mathbb{R}$ continuous, and
$$c_n = sup{c in [a,b] : |f(x) - f(c_{n-1})| < epsilon text{ for any } x in [c_{n-1},c]}$$
with $c_1 = a$. In a previous exercise we saw that $c_n$ goes to $b$, so we have those intervals $[c_{n-1},c]$ covering the whole of $[a,b]$.
What I have been tasked to do is to prove, using this, that a continuous function on a closed and bounded interval is uniformly continuous. I have some clue about how to go about this, yet I cannot figure out how to prove this is the case if for some $x$ and $delta$, $x-delta$ is on one of the intervals and $x+delta$ is on another.
real-analysis sequences-and-series analysis continuity uniform-continuity
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have $f: [a.b] rightarrow mathbb{R}$ continuous, and
$$c_n = sup{c in [a,b] : |f(x) - f(c_{n-1})| < epsilon text{ for any } x in [c_{n-1},c]}$$
with $c_1 = a$. In a previous exercise we saw that $c_n$ goes to $b$, so we have those intervals $[c_{n-1},c]$ covering the whole of $[a,b]$.
What I have been tasked to do is to prove, using this, that a continuous function on a closed and bounded interval is uniformly continuous. I have some clue about how to go about this, yet I cannot figure out how to prove this is the case if for some $x$ and $delta$, $x-delta$ is on one of the intervals and $x+delta$ is on another.
real-analysis sequences-and-series analysis continuity uniform-continuity
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Instead of "converges uniformly", did you intend to write "is uniformly continuous"?
$endgroup$
– jawheele
Mar 12 at 15:40
$begingroup$
I did, thanks for the catch!
$endgroup$
– David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
Mar 12 at 15:59
$begingroup$
And did you show in the previous exercise that $c_n$ goes to $b$ in finitely many steps? Or only that $lim_{n to infty} c_n =b$?
$endgroup$
– jawheele
Mar 12 at 16:02
$begingroup$
I did see that it goes in finitely many steps
$endgroup$
– David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
Mar 12 at 16:09
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have $f: [a.b] rightarrow mathbb{R}$ continuous, and
$$c_n = sup{c in [a,b] : |f(x) - f(c_{n-1})| < epsilon text{ for any } x in [c_{n-1},c]}$$
with $c_1 = a$. In a previous exercise we saw that $c_n$ goes to $b$, so we have those intervals $[c_{n-1},c]$ covering the whole of $[a,b]$.
What I have been tasked to do is to prove, using this, that a continuous function on a closed and bounded interval is uniformly continuous. I have some clue about how to go about this, yet I cannot figure out how to prove this is the case if for some $x$ and $delta$, $x-delta$ is on one of the intervals and $x+delta$ is on another.
real-analysis sequences-and-series analysis continuity uniform-continuity
$endgroup$
We have $f: [a.b] rightarrow mathbb{R}$ continuous, and
$$c_n = sup{c in [a,b] : |f(x) - f(c_{n-1})| < epsilon text{ for any } x in [c_{n-1},c]}$$
with $c_1 = a$. In a previous exercise we saw that $c_n$ goes to $b$, so we have those intervals $[c_{n-1},c]$ covering the whole of $[a,b]$.
What I have been tasked to do is to prove, using this, that a continuous function on a closed and bounded interval is uniformly continuous. I have some clue about how to go about this, yet I cannot figure out how to prove this is the case if for some $x$ and $delta$, $x-delta$ is on one of the intervals and $x+delta$ is on another.
real-analysis sequences-and-series analysis continuity uniform-continuity
real-analysis sequences-and-series analysis continuity uniform-continuity
edited Mar 12 at 15:59
David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
asked Mar 12 at 15:28
David Gravanita DGDASMASTERDavid Gravanita DGDASMASTER
525
525
$begingroup$
Instead of "converges uniformly", did you intend to write "is uniformly continuous"?
$endgroup$
– jawheele
Mar 12 at 15:40
$begingroup$
I did, thanks for the catch!
$endgroup$
– David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
Mar 12 at 15:59
$begingroup$
And did you show in the previous exercise that $c_n$ goes to $b$ in finitely many steps? Or only that $lim_{n to infty} c_n =b$?
$endgroup$
– jawheele
Mar 12 at 16:02
$begingroup$
I did see that it goes in finitely many steps
$endgroup$
– David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
Mar 12 at 16:09
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Instead of "converges uniformly", did you intend to write "is uniformly continuous"?
$endgroup$
– jawheele
Mar 12 at 15:40
$begingroup$
I did, thanks for the catch!
$endgroup$
– David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
Mar 12 at 15:59
$begingroup$
And did you show in the previous exercise that $c_n$ goes to $b$ in finitely many steps? Or only that $lim_{n to infty} c_n =b$?
$endgroup$
– jawheele
Mar 12 at 16:02
$begingroup$
I did see that it goes in finitely many steps
$endgroup$
– David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
Mar 12 at 16:09
$begingroup$
Instead of "converges uniformly", did you intend to write "is uniformly continuous"?
$endgroup$
– jawheele
Mar 12 at 15:40
$begingroup$
Instead of "converges uniformly", did you intend to write "is uniformly continuous"?
$endgroup$
– jawheele
Mar 12 at 15:40
$begingroup$
I did, thanks for the catch!
$endgroup$
– David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
Mar 12 at 15:59
$begingroup$
I did, thanks for the catch!
$endgroup$
– David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
Mar 12 at 15:59
$begingroup$
And did you show in the previous exercise that $c_n$ goes to $b$ in finitely many steps? Or only that $lim_{n to infty} c_n =b$?
$endgroup$
– jawheele
Mar 12 at 16:02
$begingroup$
And did you show in the previous exercise that $c_n$ goes to $b$ in finitely many steps? Or only that $lim_{n to infty} c_n =b$?
$endgroup$
– jawheele
Mar 12 at 16:02
$begingroup$
I did see that it goes in finitely many steps
$endgroup$
– David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
Mar 12 at 16:09
$begingroup$
I did see that it goes in finitely many steps
$endgroup$
– David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
Mar 12 at 16:09
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You've shown that for any given $epsilon>0$, you have a corresponding partition ${c_n}_{n=1}^{N}$ of the interval $[a,b]$ such that $c_1=a,$ $ c_N=b$, and for each $1 leq n < N$, $forall x in [c_n,c_{n+1})$ you have $|f(x)-f(c_n)| < epsilon$. Note this implies also that $|f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| leq epsilon$.
Fix an $epsilon>0$, and consider the above sequence ${c_n}$ corresponding to $frac{epsilon}{3}$. Choose
$$delta= min_{1 leq n < N}{c_{n+1}-c_{n}}$$
Then for any $x,y in [a,b]$ such that $|y-x| < delta$, suppose WLOG that $x leq y$ and consider that $exists$ $1 leq n < N$ such that $x in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, and we either have $y leq c_{n+1}$ or $y > c_{n+1}$.
In the former case, $y in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, so
$$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_n)|+|f(x)-f(c_n)| leq frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} < epsilon$$
By construction of the partition.
In the latter case, $y > c_{n+1} geq x$ (note $n leq N-2$ for this case to occur), so
$$y-c_{n+1} leq y-x < delta leq c_{n+2}-c_{n+1}$$
and hence $y < c_{n+2}$, i.e. $y in [c_{n+1},c_{n+2})$, and we have
$$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_{n+1})| + |f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| + |f(x)-f(c_n)| < frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} = epsilon$$
again by construction of the partition, showing that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[a,b]$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3145223%2fcontinuity-on-infinity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You've shown that for any given $epsilon>0$, you have a corresponding partition ${c_n}_{n=1}^{N}$ of the interval $[a,b]$ such that $c_1=a,$ $ c_N=b$, and for each $1 leq n < N$, $forall x in [c_n,c_{n+1})$ you have $|f(x)-f(c_n)| < epsilon$. Note this implies also that $|f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| leq epsilon$.
Fix an $epsilon>0$, and consider the above sequence ${c_n}$ corresponding to $frac{epsilon}{3}$. Choose
$$delta= min_{1 leq n < N}{c_{n+1}-c_{n}}$$
Then for any $x,y in [a,b]$ such that $|y-x| < delta$, suppose WLOG that $x leq y$ and consider that $exists$ $1 leq n < N$ such that $x in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, and we either have $y leq c_{n+1}$ or $y > c_{n+1}$.
In the former case, $y in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, so
$$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_n)|+|f(x)-f(c_n)| leq frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} < epsilon$$
By construction of the partition.
In the latter case, $y > c_{n+1} geq x$ (note $n leq N-2$ for this case to occur), so
$$y-c_{n+1} leq y-x < delta leq c_{n+2}-c_{n+1}$$
and hence $y < c_{n+2}$, i.e. $y in [c_{n+1},c_{n+2})$, and we have
$$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_{n+1})| + |f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| + |f(x)-f(c_n)| < frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} = epsilon$$
again by construction of the partition, showing that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[a,b]$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You've shown that for any given $epsilon>0$, you have a corresponding partition ${c_n}_{n=1}^{N}$ of the interval $[a,b]$ such that $c_1=a,$ $ c_N=b$, and for each $1 leq n < N$, $forall x in [c_n,c_{n+1})$ you have $|f(x)-f(c_n)| < epsilon$. Note this implies also that $|f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| leq epsilon$.
Fix an $epsilon>0$, and consider the above sequence ${c_n}$ corresponding to $frac{epsilon}{3}$. Choose
$$delta= min_{1 leq n < N}{c_{n+1}-c_{n}}$$
Then for any $x,y in [a,b]$ such that $|y-x| < delta$, suppose WLOG that $x leq y$ and consider that $exists$ $1 leq n < N$ such that $x in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, and we either have $y leq c_{n+1}$ or $y > c_{n+1}$.
In the former case, $y in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, so
$$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_n)|+|f(x)-f(c_n)| leq frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} < epsilon$$
By construction of the partition.
In the latter case, $y > c_{n+1} geq x$ (note $n leq N-2$ for this case to occur), so
$$y-c_{n+1} leq y-x < delta leq c_{n+2}-c_{n+1}$$
and hence $y < c_{n+2}$, i.e. $y in [c_{n+1},c_{n+2})$, and we have
$$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_{n+1})| + |f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| + |f(x)-f(c_n)| < frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} = epsilon$$
again by construction of the partition, showing that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[a,b]$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You've shown that for any given $epsilon>0$, you have a corresponding partition ${c_n}_{n=1}^{N}$ of the interval $[a,b]$ such that $c_1=a,$ $ c_N=b$, and for each $1 leq n < N$, $forall x in [c_n,c_{n+1})$ you have $|f(x)-f(c_n)| < epsilon$. Note this implies also that $|f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| leq epsilon$.
Fix an $epsilon>0$, and consider the above sequence ${c_n}$ corresponding to $frac{epsilon}{3}$. Choose
$$delta= min_{1 leq n < N}{c_{n+1}-c_{n}}$$
Then for any $x,y in [a,b]$ such that $|y-x| < delta$, suppose WLOG that $x leq y$ and consider that $exists$ $1 leq n < N$ such that $x in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, and we either have $y leq c_{n+1}$ or $y > c_{n+1}$.
In the former case, $y in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, so
$$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_n)|+|f(x)-f(c_n)| leq frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} < epsilon$$
By construction of the partition.
In the latter case, $y > c_{n+1} geq x$ (note $n leq N-2$ for this case to occur), so
$$y-c_{n+1} leq y-x < delta leq c_{n+2}-c_{n+1}$$
and hence $y < c_{n+2}$, i.e. $y in [c_{n+1},c_{n+2})$, and we have
$$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_{n+1})| + |f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| + |f(x)-f(c_n)| < frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} = epsilon$$
again by construction of the partition, showing that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[a,b]$.
$endgroup$
You've shown that for any given $epsilon>0$, you have a corresponding partition ${c_n}_{n=1}^{N}$ of the interval $[a,b]$ such that $c_1=a,$ $ c_N=b$, and for each $1 leq n < N$, $forall x in [c_n,c_{n+1})$ you have $|f(x)-f(c_n)| < epsilon$. Note this implies also that $|f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| leq epsilon$.
Fix an $epsilon>0$, and consider the above sequence ${c_n}$ corresponding to $frac{epsilon}{3}$. Choose
$$delta= min_{1 leq n < N}{c_{n+1}-c_{n}}$$
Then for any $x,y in [a,b]$ such that $|y-x| < delta$, suppose WLOG that $x leq y$ and consider that $exists$ $1 leq n < N$ such that $x in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, and we either have $y leq c_{n+1}$ or $y > c_{n+1}$.
In the former case, $y in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, so
$$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_n)|+|f(x)-f(c_n)| leq frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} < epsilon$$
By construction of the partition.
In the latter case, $y > c_{n+1} geq x$ (note $n leq N-2$ for this case to occur), so
$$y-c_{n+1} leq y-x < delta leq c_{n+2}-c_{n+1}$$
and hence $y < c_{n+2}$, i.e. $y in [c_{n+1},c_{n+2})$, and we have
$$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_{n+1})| + |f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| + |f(x)-f(c_n)| < frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} = epsilon$$
again by construction of the partition, showing that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[a,b]$.
answered Mar 12 at 16:55
jawheelejawheele
30219
30219
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3145223%2fcontinuity-on-infinity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Instead of "converges uniformly", did you intend to write "is uniformly continuous"?
$endgroup$
– jawheele
Mar 12 at 15:40
$begingroup$
I did, thanks for the catch!
$endgroup$
– David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
Mar 12 at 15:59
$begingroup$
And did you show in the previous exercise that $c_n$ goes to $b$ in finitely many steps? Or only that $lim_{n to infty} c_n =b$?
$endgroup$
– jawheele
Mar 12 at 16:02
$begingroup$
I did see that it goes in finitely many steps
$endgroup$
– David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
Mar 12 at 16:09