Continuity on infinityProving uniform continuity on an intervalContinuity of a constant functioncontinuity...

Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?

Trouble reading roman numeral notation with flats

Why is indicated airspeed rather than ground speed used during the takeoff roll?

What can I do if I am asked to learn different programming languages very frequently?

What do the positive and negative (+/-) transmit and receive pins mean on Ethernet cables?

Is divisi notation needed for brass or woodwind in an orchestra?

Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?

What is the tangent at a sharp point on a curve?

A seasonal riddle

Can a Knock spell open the door to Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion?

Highest stage count that are used one right after the other?

Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks

Checking @@ROWCOUNT failing

Should a narrator ever describe things based on a character's view instead of facts?

How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?

Does capillary rise violate hydrostatic paradox?

C++ lambda syntax

Is there a distance limit for minecart tracks?

Non-Borel set in arbitrary metric space

Why does the Persian emissary display a string of crowned skulls?

Offset in split text content

Why is "la Gestapo" feminine?

Index matching algorithm without hash-based data structures?

Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup



Continuity on infinity


Proving uniform continuity on an intervalContinuity of a constant functioncontinuity and uniform continuty of $1/x$Prove that the Rational function $fleft(xright)=frac{pleft(xright)}{qleft(xright)}$ is uniformly continuousProof of uniformly continuous for nth root of x on [0,+∞)Given a continuous function with an asymptote, prove that the function is uniformly continuous.How to prove that $arg: S^1setminus{-1}to (-pi,pi)$ is continuous? (With restrictions.)$f$ be real uniformly continuous function on the bounded set $E$ of $Bbb R$ then $f$ is bounded on $E$“Trick” to finding Delta in proving continuity/uniform continuity?Real Analysis - Uniform continuity













1












$begingroup$


We have $f: [a.b] rightarrow mathbb{R}$ continuous, and
$$c_n = sup{c in [a,b] : |f(x) - f(c_{n-1})| < epsilon text{ for any } x in [c_{n-1},c]}$$
with $c_1 = a$. In a previous exercise we saw that $c_n$ goes to $b$, so we have those intervals $[c_{n-1},c]$ covering the whole of $[a,b]$.



What I have been tasked to do is to prove, using this, that a continuous function on a closed and bounded interval is uniformly continuous. I have some clue about how to go about this, yet I cannot figure out how to prove this is the case if for some $x$ and $delta$, $x-delta$ is on one of the intervals and $x+delta$ is on another.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Instead of "converges uniformly", did you intend to write "is uniformly continuous"?
    $endgroup$
    – jawheele
    Mar 12 at 15:40










  • $begingroup$
    I did, thanks for the catch!
    $endgroup$
    – David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
    Mar 12 at 15:59










  • $begingroup$
    And did you show in the previous exercise that $c_n$ goes to $b$ in finitely many steps? Or only that $lim_{n to infty} c_n =b$?
    $endgroup$
    – jawheele
    Mar 12 at 16:02










  • $begingroup$
    I did see that it goes in finitely many steps
    $endgroup$
    – David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
    Mar 12 at 16:09
















1












$begingroup$


We have $f: [a.b] rightarrow mathbb{R}$ continuous, and
$$c_n = sup{c in [a,b] : |f(x) - f(c_{n-1})| < epsilon text{ for any } x in [c_{n-1},c]}$$
with $c_1 = a$. In a previous exercise we saw that $c_n$ goes to $b$, so we have those intervals $[c_{n-1},c]$ covering the whole of $[a,b]$.



What I have been tasked to do is to prove, using this, that a continuous function on a closed and bounded interval is uniformly continuous. I have some clue about how to go about this, yet I cannot figure out how to prove this is the case if for some $x$ and $delta$, $x-delta$ is on one of the intervals and $x+delta$ is on another.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Instead of "converges uniformly", did you intend to write "is uniformly continuous"?
    $endgroup$
    – jawheele
    Mar 12 at 15:40










  • $begingroup$
    I did, thanks for the catch!
    $endgroup$
    – David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
    Mar 12 at 15:59










  • $begingroup$
    And did you show in the previous exercise that $c_n$ goes to $b$ in finitely many steps? Or only that $lim_{n to infty} c_n =b$?
    $endgroup$
    – jawheele
    Mar 12 at 16:02










  • $begingroup$
    I did see that it goes in finitely many steps
    $endgroup$
    – David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
    Mar 12 at 16:09














1












1








1





$begingroup$


We have $f: [a.b] rightarrow mathbb{R}$ continuous, and
$$c_n = sup{c in [a,b] : |f(x) - f(c_{n-1})| < epsilon text{ for any } x in [c_{n-1},c]}$$
with $c_1 = a$. In a previous exercise we saw that $c_n$ goes to $b$, so we have those intervals $[c_{n-1},c]$ covering the whole of $[a,b]$.



What I have been tasked to do is to prove, using this, that a continuous function on a closed and bounded interval is uniformly continuous. I have some clue about how to go about this, yet I cannot figure out how to prove this is the case if for some $x$ and $delta$, $x-delta$ is on one of the intervals and $x+delta$ is on another.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




We have $f: [a.b] rightarrow mathbb{R}$ continuous, and
$$c_n = sup{c in [a,b] : |f(x) - f(c_{n-1})| < epsilon text{ for any } x in [c_{n-1},c]}$$
with $c_1 = a$. In a previous exercise we saw that $c_n$ goes to $b$, so we have those intervals $[c_{n-1},c]$ covering the whole of $[a,b]$.



What I have been tasked to do is to prove, using this, that a continuous function on a closed and bounded interval is uniformly continuous. I have some clue about how to go about this, yet I cannot figure out how to prove this is the case if for some $x$ and $delta$, $x-delta$ is on one of the intervals and $x+delta$ is on another.







real-analysis sequences-and-series analysis continuity uniform-continuity






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 12 at 15:59







David Gravanita DGDASMASTER

















asked Mar 12 at 15:28









David Gravanita DGDASMASTERDavid Gravanita DGDASMASTER

525




525












  • $begingroup$
    Instead of "converges uniformly", did you intend to write "is uniformly continuous"?
    $endgroup$
    – jawheele
    Mar 12 at 15:40










  • $begingroup$
    I did, thanks for the catch!
    $endgroup$
    – David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
    Mar 12 at 15:59










  • $begingroup$
    And did you show in the previous exercise that $c_n$ goes to $b$ in finitely many steps? Or only that $lim_{n to infty} c_n =b$?
    $endgroup$
    – jawheele
    Mar 12 at 16:02










  • $begingroup$
    I did see that it goes in finitely many steps
    $endgroup$
    – David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
    Mar 12 at 16:09


















  • $begingroup$
    Instead of "converges uniformly", did you intend to write "is uniformly continuous"?
    $endgroup$
    – jawheele
    Mar 12 at 15:40










  • $begingroup$
    I did, thanks for the catch!
    $endgroup$
    – David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
    Mar 12 at 15:59










  • $begingroup$
    And did you show in the previous exercise that $c_n$ goes to $b$ in finitely many steps? Or only that $lim_{n to infty} c_n =b$?
    $endgroup$
    – jawheele
    Mar 12 at 16:02










  • $begingroup$
    I did see that it goes in finitely many steps
    $endgroup$
    – David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
    Mar 12 at 16:09
















$begingroup$
Instead of "converges uniformly", did you intend to write "is uniformly continuous"?
$endgroup$
– jawheele
Mar 12 at 15:40




$begingroup$
Instead of "converges uniformly", did you intend to write "is uniformly continuous"?
$endgroup$
– jawheele
Mar 12 at 15:40












$begingroup$
I did, thanks for the catch!
$endgroup$
– David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
Mar 12 at 15:59




$begingroup$
I did, thanks for the catch!
$endgroup$
– David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
Mar 12 at 15:59












$begingroup$
And did you show in the previous exercise that $c_n$ goes to $b$ in finitely many steps? Or only that $lim_{n to infty} c_n =b$?
$endgroup$
– jawheele
Mar 12 at 16:02




$begingroup$
And did you show in the previous exercise that $c_n$ goes to $b$ in finitely many steps? Or only that $lim_{n to infty} c_n =b$?
$endgroup$
– jawheele
Mar 12 at 16:02












$begingroup$
I did see that it goes in finitely many steps
$endgroup$
– David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
Mar 12 at 16:09




$begingroup$
I did see that it goes in finitely many steps
$endgroup$
– David Gravanita DGDASMASTER
Mar 12 at 16:09










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

You've shown that for any given $epsilon>0$, you have a corresponding partition ${c_n}_{n=1}^{N}$ of the interval $[a,b]$ such that $c_1=a,$ $ c_N=b$, and for each $1 leq n < N$, $forall x in [c_n,c_{n+1})$ you have $|f(x)-f(c_n)| < epsilon$. Note this implies also that $|f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| leq epsilon$.



Fix an $epsilon>0$, and consider the above sequence ${c_n}$ corresponding to $frac{epsilon}{3}$. Choose
$$delta= min_{1 leq n < N}{c_{n+1}-c_{n}}$$
Then for any $x,y in [a,b]$ such that $|y-x| < delta$, suppose WLOG that $x leq y$ and consider that $exists$ $1 leq n < N$ such that $x in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, and we either have $y leq c_{n+1}$ or $y > c_{n+1}$.



In the former case, $y in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, so
$$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_n)|+|f(x)-f(c_n)| leq frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} < epsilon$$
By construction of the partition.



In the latter case, $y > c_{n+1} geq x$ (note $n leq N-2$ for this case to occur), so
$$y-c_{n+1} leq y-x < delta leq c_{n+2}-c_{n+1}$$
and hence $y < c_{n+2}$, i.e. $y in [c_{n+1},c_{n+2})$, and we have
$$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_{n+1})| + |f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| + |f(x)-f(c_n)| < frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} = epsilon$$
again by construction of the partition, showing that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[a,b]$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3145223%2fcontinuity-on-infinity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    You've shown that for any given $epsilon>0$, you have a corresponding partition ${c_n}_{n=1}^{N}$ of the interval $[a,b]$ such that $c_1=a,$ $ c_N=b$, and for each $1 leq n < N$, $forall x in [c_n,c_{n+1})$ you have $|f(x)-f(c_n)| < epsilon$. Note this implies also that $|f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| leq epsilon$.



    Fix an $epsilon>0$, and consider the above sequence ${c_n}$ corresponding to $frac{epsilon}{3}$. Choose
    $$delta= min_{1 leq n < N}{c_{n+1}-c_{n}}$$
    Then for any $x,y in [a,b]$ such that $|y-x| < delta$, suppose WLOG that $x leq y$ and consider that $exists$ $1 leq n < N$ such that $x in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, and we either have $y leq c_{n+1}$ or $y > c_{n+1}$.



    In the former case, $y in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, so
    $$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_n)|+|f(x)-f(c_n)| leq frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} < epsilon$$
    By construction of the partition.



    In the latter case, $y > c_{n+1} geq x$ (note $n leq N-2$ for this case to occur), so
    $$y-c_{n+1} leq y-x < delta leq c_{n+2}-c_{n+1}$$
    and hence $y < c_{n+2}$, i.e. $y in [c_{n+1},c_{n+2})$, and we have
    $$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_{n+1})| + |f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| + |f(x)-f(c_n)| < frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} = epsilon$$
    again by construction of the partition, showing that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[a,b]$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      You've shown that for any given $epsilon>0$, you have a corresponding partition ${c_n}_{n=1}^{N}$ of the interval $[a,b]$ such that $c_1=a,$ $ c_N=b$, and for each $1 leq n < N$, $forall x in [c_n,c_{n+1})$ you have $|f(x)-f(c_n)| < epsilon$. Note this implies also that $|f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| leq epsilon$.



      Fix an $epsilon>0$, and consider the above sequence ${c_n}$ corresponding to $frac{epsilon}{3}$. Choose
      $$delta= min_{1 leq n < N}{c_{n+1}-c_{n}}$$
      Then for any $x,y in [a,b]$ such that $|y-x| < delta$, suppose WLOG that $x leq y$ and consider that $exists$ $1 leq n < N$ such that $x in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, and we either have $y leq c_{n+1}$ or $y > c_{n+1}$.



      In the former case, $y in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, so
      $$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_n)|+|f(x)-f(c_n)| leq frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} < epsilon$$
      By construction of the partition.



      In the latter case, $y > c_{n+1} geq x$ (note $n leq N-2$ for this case to occur), so
      $$y-c_{n+1} leq y-x < delta leq c_{n+2}-c_{n+1}$$
      and hence $y < c_{n+2}$, i.e. $y in [c_{n+1},c_{n+2})$, and we have
      $$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_{n+1})| + |f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| + |f(x)-f(c_n)| < frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} = epsilon$$
      again by construction of the partition, showing that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[a,b]$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        You've shown that for any given $epsilon>0$, you have a corresponding partition ${c_n}_{n=1}^{N}$ of the interval $[a,b]$ such that $c_1=a,$ $ c_N=b$, and for each $1 leq n < N$, $forall x in [c_n,c_{n+1})$ you have $|f(x)-f(c_n)| < epsilon$. Note this implies also that $|f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| leq epsilon$.



        Fix an $epsilon>0$, and consider the above sequence ${c_n}$ corresponding to $frac{epsilon}{3}$. Choose
        $$delta= min_{1 leq n < N}{c_{n+1}-c_{n}}$$
        Then for any $x,y in [a,b]$ such that $|y-x| < delta$, suppose WLOG that $x leq y$ and consider that $exists$ $1 leq n < N$ such that $x in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, and we either have $y leq c_{n+1}$ or $y > c_{n+1}$.



        In the former case, $y in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, so
        $$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_n)|+|f(x)-f(c_n)| leq frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} < epsilon$$
        By construction of the partition.



        In the latter case, $y > c_{n+1} geq x$ (note $n leq N-2$ for this case to occur), so
        $$y-c_{n+1} leq y-x < delta leq c_{n+2}-c_{n+1}$$
        and hence $y < c_{n+2}$, i.e. $y in [c_{n+1},c_{n+2})$, and we have
        $$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_{n+1})| + |f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| + |f(x)-f(c_n)| < frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} = epsilon$$
        again by construction of the partition, showing that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[a,b]$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        You've shown that for any given $epsilon>0$, you have a corresponding partition ${c_n}_{n=1}^{N}$ of the interval $[a,b]$ such that $c_1=a,$ $ c_N=b$, and for each $1 leq n < N$, $forall x in [c_n,c_{n+1})$ you have $|f(x)-f(c_n)| < epsilon$. Note this implies also that $|f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| leq epsilon$.



        Fix an $epsilon>0$, and consider the above sequence ${c_n}$ corresponding to $frac{epsilon}{3}$. Choose
        $$delta= min_{1 leq n < N}{c_{n+1}-c_{n}}$$
        Then for any $x,y in [a,b]$ such that $|y-x| < delta$, suppose WLOG that $x leq y$ and consider that $exists$ $1 leq n < N$ such that $x in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, and we either have $y leq c_{n+1}$ or $y > c_{n+1}$.



        In the former case, $y in [c_n,c_{n+1}]$, so
        $$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_n)|+|f(x)-f(c_n)| leq frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} < epsilon$$
        By construction of the partition.



        In the latter case, $y > c_{n+1} geq x$ (note $n leq N-2$ for this case to occur), so
        $$y-c_{n+1} leq y-x < delta leq c_{n+2}-c_{n+1}$$
        and hence $y < c_{n+2}$, i.e. $y in [c_{n+1},c_{n+2})$, and we have
        $$|f(y)-f(x)| leq |f(y)-f(c_{n+1})| + |f(c_{n+1})-f(c_n)| + |f(x)-f(c_n)| < frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} + frac{epsilon}{3} = epsilon$$
        again by construction of the partition, showing that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[a,b]$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 12 at 16:55









        jawheelejawheele

        30219




        30219






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3145223%2fcontinuity-on-infinity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Nidaros erkebispedøme

            Birsay

            Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...