Continuity under a measure integralExistence of measure factorizationLeibniz's Derivative Rule for Integral...
Using parameter substitution on a Bash array
Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?
How will losing mobility of one hand affect my career as a programmer?
Why Were Madagascar and New Zealand Discovered So Late?
Applicability of Single Responsibility Principle
What are the ramifications of creating a homebrew world without an Astral Plane?
How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users
Bash method for viewing beginning and end of file
How does it work when somebody invests in my business?
Curses work by shouting - How to avoid collateral damage?
Will it be accepted, if there is no ''Main Character" stereotype?
What does this 7 mean above the f flat
The plural of 'stomach"
Everything Bob says is false. How does he get people to trust him?
How was Earth single-handedly capable of creating 3 of the 4 gods of chaos?
How do we know the LHC results are robust?
Is it correct to write "is not focus on"?
Student evaluations of teaching assistants
Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?
How can I use the arrow sign in my bash prompt?
Products and sum of cubes in Fibonacci
Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python
How do I rename a LINUX host without needing to reboot for the rename to take effect?
voltage of sounds of mp3files
Continuity under a measure integral
Existence of measure factorizationLeibniz's Derivative Rule for Integral in Measure TheoryContinuity under the integral sign?Absolute continuity under the integralLebesgue measure of region under curveDerivative of a probability measureStandard notation or name for the measure defined by an integral over a functionOn the continuity of a function given by the 'partial' Lebesgue integral of a multivariable functionImage measure- equivalent integration and integrableAbsolute continuity of probability measure wrt Lebesgue measure
$begingroup$
Suppose $(Omega, mathcal{F}, nu)$ is a measure space and that $f=f(x,t) : Omega times mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ is integrable and measurable in $x$ and is continuous in $t$. Define $F: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ by
$$F(t) = int_{Omega} f(x,t) dnu(x).$$
Is $F$ continuous?
real-analysis measure-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $(Omega, mathcal{F}, nu)$ is a measure space and that $f=f(x,t) : Omega times mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ is integrable and measurable in $x$ and is continuous in $t$. Define $F: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ by
$$F(t) = int_{Omega} f(x,t) dnu(x).$$
Is $F$ continuous?
real-analysis measure-theory
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
"Fundamental Theorem of Calculus' has a different meaning.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 15 at 9:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $(Omega, mathcal{F}, nu)$ is a measure space and that $f=f(x,t) : Omega times mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ is integrable and measurable in $x$ and is continuous in $t$. Define $F: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ by
$$F(t) = int_{Omega} f(x,t) dnu(x).$$
Is $F$ continuous?
real-analysis measure-theory
$endgroup$
Suppose $(Omega, mathcal{F}, nu)$ is a measure space and that $f=f(x,t) : Omega times mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ is integrable and measurable in $x$ and is continuous in $t$. Define $F: mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ by
$$F(t) = int_{Omega} f(x,t) dnu(x).$$
Is $F$ continuous?
real-analysis measure-theory
real-analysis measure-theory
edited Mar 15 at 9:51
talfred
asked Mar 15 at 9:34
talfredtalfred
1007
1007
1
$begingroup$
"Fundamental Theorem of Calculus' has a different meaning.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 15 at 9:48
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
"Fundamental Theorem of Calculus' has a different meaning.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 15 at 9:48
1
1
$begingroup$
"Fundamental Theorem of Calculus' has a different meaning.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 15 at 9:48
$begingroup$
"Fundamental Theorem of Calculus' has a different meaning.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 15 at 9:48
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $f(x,t)=sum g_n(t)I_{E_n}(x)$ where $E_n$'s are pairwise disjoint measurable sets and each $g_n$ is continuous. Then the hypothesis is satisfied and $F(t)=sum g_n(t)nu (E_n)$. So to get a counterexample, all you have to do is find continuous functions $g_n$ and positive numbers $a_n$ such that $sum a_ng_n$ converges but the sum is not continuous. (We can always find disjoint measurable sets $E_n$ with $a_n=nu (E_n)$. We can take $nu$ to be Lebesgue measure on $mathbb R$, for example). I will leave this part to you.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So if that sum converges uniformly, I think we are okay? If we further assume that $|f(x,t)| leq g(x)$ for every $x, t$ for some integrable function $g$, I think we can appeal to the Dominated Convergence Theorem to get continuity?
$endgroup$
– talfred
Mar 15 at 9:55
1
$begingroup$
That is a good point. We need something like DCT to prove continuity of $F$ so we have to put some extra conditions. Uniform convergence will do the job if $nu$ is a finite measure.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 15 at 9:57
$begingroup$
If you can bound $f$ by an integrable function, the result is true by DCT.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Mar 15 at 11:10
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3149108%2fcontinuity-under-a-measure-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $f(x,t)=sum g_n(t)I_{E_n}(x)$ where $E_n$'s are pairwise disjoint measurable sets and each $g_n$ is continuous. Then the hypothesis is satisfied and $F(t)=sum g_n(t)nu (E_n)$. So to get a counterexample, all you have to do is find continuous functions $g_n$ and positive numbers $a_n$ such that $sum a_ng_n$ converges but the sum is not continuous. (We can always find disjoint measurable sets $E_n$ with $a_n=nu (E_n)$. We can take $nu$ to be Lebesgue measure on $mathbb R$, for example). I will leave this part to you.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So if that sum converges uniformly, I think we are okay? If we further assume that $|f(x,t)| leq g(x)$ for every $x, t$ for some integrable function $g$, I think we can appeal to the Dominated Convergence Theorem to get continuity?
$endgroup$
– talfred
Mar 15 at 9:55
1
$begingroup$
That is a good point. We need something like DCT to prove continuity of $F$ so we have to put some extra conditions. Uniform convergence will do the job if $nu$ is a finite measure.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 15 at 9:57
$begingroup$
If you can bound $f$ by an integrable function, the result is true by DCT.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Mar 15 at 11:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f(x,t)=sum g_n(t)I_{E_n}(x)$ where $E_n$'s are pairwise disjoint measurable sets and each $g_n$ is continuous. Then the hypothesis is satisfied and $F(t)=sum g_n(t)nu (E_n)$. So to get a counterexample, all you have to do is find continuous functions $g_n$ and positive numbers $a_n$ such that $sum a_ng_n$ converges but the sum is not continuous. (We can always find disjoint measurable sets $E_n$ with $a_n=nu (E_n)$. We can take $nu$ to be Lebesgue measure on $mathbb R$, for example). I will leave this part to you.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So if that sum converges uniformly, I think we are okay? If we further assume that $|f(x,t)| leq g(x)$ for every $x, t$ for some integrable function $g$, I think we can appeal to the Dominated Convergence Theorem to get continuity?
$endgroup$
– talfred
Mar 15 at 9:55
1
$begingroup$
That is a good point. We need something like DCT to prove continuity of $F$ so we have to put some extra conditions. Uniform convergence will do the job if $nu$ is a finite measure.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 15 at 9:57
$begingroup$
If you can bound $f$ by an integrable function, the result is true by DCT.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Mar 15 at 11:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f(x,t)=sum g_n(t)I_{E_n}(x)$ where $E_n$'s are pairwise disjoint measurable sets and each $g_n$ is continuous. Then the hypothesis is satisfied and $F(t)=sum g_n(t)nu (E_n)$. So to get a counterexample, all you have to do is find continuous functions $g_n$ and positive numbers $a_n$ such that $sum a_ng_n$ converges but the sum is not continuous. (We can always find disjoint measurable sets $E_n$ with $a_n=nu (E_n)$. We can take $nu$ to be Lebesgue measure on $mathbb R$, for example). I will leave this part to you.
$endgroup$
Let $f(x,t)=sum g_n(t)I_{E_n}(x)$ where $E_n$'s are pairwise disjoint measurable sets and each $g_n$ is continuous. Then the hypothesis is satisfied and $F(t)=sum g_n(t)nu (E_n)$. So to get a counterexample, all you have to do is find continuous functions $g_n$ and positive numbers $a_n$ such that $sum a_ng_n$ converges but the sum is not continuous. (We can always find disjoint measurable sets $E_n$ with $a_n=nu (E_n)$. We can take $nu$ to be Lebesgue measure on $mathbb R$, for example). I will leave this part to you.
answered Mar 15 at 9:45
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
70.2k53170
70.2k53170
$begingroup$
So if that sum converges uniformly, I think we are okay? If we further assume that $|f(x,t)| leq g(x)$ for every $x, t$ for some integrable function $g$, I think we can appeal to the Dominated Convergence Theorem to get continuity?
$endgroup$
– talfred
Mar 15 at 9:55
1
$begingroup$
That is a good point. We need something like DCT to prove continuity of $F$ so we have to put some extra conditions. Uniform convergence will do the job if $nu$ is a finite measure.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 15 at 9:57
$begingroup$
If you can bound $f$ by an integrable function, the result is true by DCT.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Mar 15 at 11:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So if that sum converges uniformly, I think we are okay? If we further assume that $|f(x,t)| leq g(x)$ for every $x, t$ for some integrable function $g$, I think we can appeal to the Dominated Convergence Theorem to get continuity?
$endgroup$
– talfred
Mar 15 at 9:55
1
$begingroup$
That is a good point. We need something like DCT to prove continuity of $F$ so we have to put some extra conditions. Uniform convergence will do the job if $nu$ is a finite measure.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 15 at 9:57
$begingroup$
If you can bound $f$ by an integrable function, the result is true by DCT.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Mar 15 at 11:10
$begingroup$
So if that sum converges uniformly, I think we are okay? If we further assume that $|f(x,t)| leq g(x)$ for every $x, t$ for some integrable function $g$, I think we can appeal to the Dominated Convergence Theorem to get continuity?
$endgroup$
– talfred
Mar 15 at 9:55
$begingroup$
So if that sum converges uniformly, I think we are okay? If we further assume that $|f(x,t)| leq g(x)$ for every $x, t$ for some integrable function $g$, I think we can appeal to the Dominated Convergence Theorem to get continuity?
$endgroup$
– talfred
Mar 15 at 9:55
1
1
$begingroup$
That is a good point. We need something like DCT to prove continuity of $F$ so we have to put some extra conditions. Uniform convergence will do the job if $nu$ is a finite measure.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 15 at 9:57
$begingroup$
That is a good point. We need something like DCT to prove continuity of $F$ so we have to put some extra conditions. Uniform convergence will do the job if $nu$ is a finite measure.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 15 at 9:57
$begingroup$
If you can bound $f$ by an integrable function, the result is true by DCT.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Mar 15 at 11:10
$begingroup$
If you can bound $f$ by an integrable function, the result is true by DCT.
$endgroup$
– Math_QED
Mar 15 at 11:10
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3149108%2fcontinuity-under-a-measure-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
"Fundamental Theorem of Calculus' has a different meaning.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 15 at 9:48