Why does $frac{u_5 operatorname{mod} u_4}{u_4 operatorname{mod} u_3} = u_3$ where $u_n$ is the number of Gray...
Why are on-board computers allowed to change controls without notifying the pilots?
Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python
I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?
How does it work when somebody invests in my business?
Is HostGator storing my password in plaintext?
What't the meaning of this extra silence?
Is exact Kanji stroke length important?
Dot above capital letter not centred
Can criminal fraud exist without damages?
Modify casing of marked letters
when is out of tune ok?
Should my PhD thesis be submitted under my legal name?
Valid Badminton Score?
Teaching indefinite integrals that require special-casing
Hide Select Output from T-SQL
How do I rename a LINUX host without needing to reboot for the rename to take effect?
Can I use my Chinese passport to enter China after I acquired another citizenship?
Trouble understanding overseas colleagues
Is there an Impartial Brexit Deal comparison site?
Do there exist finite commutative rings with identity that are not Bézout rings?
What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?
Tiptoe or tiphoof? Adjusting words to better fit fantasy races
Coordinate position not precise
What is difference between behavior and behaviour
Why does $frac{u_5 operatorname{mod} u_4}{u_4 operatorname{mod} u_3} = u_3$ where $u_n$ is the number of Gray codes on $n$ bits
Why does $frac{1}{2}A_n(2)$ count the number of ordered set partitions?“Anti-Gray codes” that maximize the number of bits that change at each stepWhy does this imply these two numbers are the same mod 8?Why is there no indefinite integral for $int xmod{n}$ (where n can be any number)?Why does the following formula cycle the bits by shifting the binary representation from left to right?Checking the IBAN and dividing large numbers mod 97. Why does it work?Encoding the answers to questions somewhere in a binary treeHow does one prove that a natural number $x$ does not generate the multiplicative group of integers mod $4nx - 1$?Why does Pascal's Triangle (mod 2) encode the Fermat primes?Why does this sum converge: $sum_{k=2}^{n-1} frac{1}{k} frac{n mod k}{n}$
$begingroup$
Let $u_n$ be the number of Gray codes on $n$ bits. See the entry on OEIS - only five values are listed.
I noticed that $$frac{u_5 operatorname{mod} u_4}{u_4 operatorname{mod} u_3} = u_3$$
Or in IPython:
In [2]: import fractions
In [3]: fractions.Fraction(187499658240 % 91392, 91392 % 144)
Out[3]: Fraction(144, 1)
Is there a reason for that, or is it just a coincidence?
If the numbers 5, 4 and 3 are replaced with 4, 3 and 2 respectively, then the analagous claim doesn't hold because $$begin{aligned}u_3 operatorname{mod} u_2 &= 0\ u_4 operatorname{mod} u_3 &= 96end{aligned}$$
$96$ is also the number of cyclic Gray codes for $n=3$. So the coincidence is also that $$u_5 operatorname{mod} u_4 = [text{number of Gray codes for }n=3] times [text{number of cyclic Gray codes for }n=3]$$
combinatorics modular-arithmetic coding-theory gray-code
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $u_n$ be the number of Gray codes on $n$ bits. See the entry on OEIS - only five values are listed.
I noticed that $$frac{u_5 operatorname{mod} u_4}{u_4 operatorname{mod} u_3} = u_3$$
Or in IPython:
In [2]: import fractions
In [3]: fractions.Fraction(187499658240 % 91392, 91392 % 144)
Out[3]: Fraction(144, 1)
Is there a reason for that, or is it just a coincidence?
If the numbers 5, 4 and 3 are replaced with 4, 3 and 2 respectively, then the analagous claim doesn't hold because $$begin{aligned}u_3 operatorname{mod} u_2 &= 0\ u_4 operatorname{mod} u_3 &= 96end{aligned}$$
$96$ is also the number of cyclic Gray codes for $n=3$. So the coincidence is also that $$u_5 operatorname{mod} u_4 = [text{number of Gray codes for }n=3] times [text{number of cyclic Gray codes for }n=3]$$
combinatorics modular-arithmetic coding-theory gray-code
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I'm betting on coincidence. Given that it works once, and fails once, I see no reason to believe it's anything but coincidence. Given three positive integers, it's not hard to find an equation they satisfy.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jul 21 '18 at 22:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $u_n$ be the number of Gray codes on $n$ bits. See the entry on OEIS - only five values are listed.
I noticed that $$frac{u_5 operatorname{mod} u_4}{u_4 operatorname{mod} u_3} = u_3$$
Or in IPython:
In [2]: import fractions
In [3]: fractions.Fraction(187499658240 % 91392, 91392 % 144)
Out[3]: Fraction(144, 1)
Is there a reason for that, or is it just a coincidence?
If the numbers 5, 4 and 3 are replaced with 4, 3 and 2 respectively, then the analagous claim doesn't hold because $$begin{aligned}u_3 operatorname{mod} u_2 &= 0\ u_4 operatorname{mod} u_3 &= 96end{aligned}$$
$96$ is also the number of cyclic Gray codes for $n=3$. So the coincidence is also that $$u_5 operatorname{mod} u_4 = [text{number of Gray codes for }n=3] times [text{number of cyclic Gray codes for }n=3]$$
combinatorics modular-arithmetic coding-theory gray-code
$endgroup$
Let $u_n$ be the number of Gray codes on $n$ bits. See the entry on OEIS - only five values are listed.
I noticed that $$frac{u_5 operatorname{mod} u_4}{u_4 operatorname{mod} u_3} = u_3$$
Or in IPython:
In [2]: import fractions
In [3]: fractions.Fraction(187499658240 % 91392, 91392 % 144)
Out[3]: Fraction(144, 1)
Is there a reason for that, or is it just a coincidence?
If the numbers 5, 4 and 3 are replaced with 4, 3 and 2 respectively, then the analagous claim doesn't hold because $$begin{aligned}u_3 operatorname{mod} u_2 &= 0\ u_4 operatorname{mod} u_3 &= 96end{aligned}$$
$96$ is also the number of cyclic Gray codes for $n=3$. So the coincidence is also that $$u_5 operatorname{mod} u_4 = [text{number of Gray codes for }n=3] times [text{number of cyclic Gray codes for }n=3]$$
combinatorics modular-arithmetic coding-theory gray-code
combinatorics modular-arithmetic coding-theory gray-code
edited Mar 15 at 9:41
YuiTo Cheng
2,1362837
2,1362837
asked Jul 21 '18 at 20:50
man on laptopman on laptop
5,78611438
5,78611438
1
$begingroup$
I'm betting on coincidence. Given that it works once, and fails once, I see no reason to believe it's anything but coincidence. Given three positive integers, it's not hard to find an equation they satisfy.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jul 21 '18 at 22:56
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I'm betting on coincidence. Given that it works once, and fails once, I see no reason to believe it's anything but coincidence. Given three positive integers, it's not hard to find an equation they satisfy.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jul 21 '18 at 22:56
1
1
$begingroup$
I'm betting on coincidence. Given that it works once, and fails once, I see no reason to believe it's anything but coincidence. Given three positive integers, it's not hard to find an equation they satisfy.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jul 21 '18 at 22:56
$begingroup$
I'm betting on coincidence. Given that it works once, and fails once, I see no reason to believe it's anything but coincidence. Given three positive integers, it's not hard to find an equation they satisfy.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jul 21 '18 at 22:56
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858875%2fwhy-does-fracu-5-operatornamemod-u-4u-4-operatornamemod-u-3-u-3-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858875%2fwhy-does-fracu-5-operatornamemod-u-4u-4-operatornamemod-u-3-u-3-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
I'm betting on coincidence. Given that it works once, and fails once, I see no reason to believe it's anything but coincidence. Given three positive integers, it's not hard to find an equation they satisfy.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Jul 21 '18 at 22:56