Convergence for the norm of a sequence in $ell^{infty}$$ell^infty$ and $ell^1$When $ell^2$-convergence...

How to efficiently unroll a matrix by value with numpy?

NMaximize is not converging to a solution

Are the number of citations and number of published articles the most important criteria for a tenure promotion?

Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?

Maximum likelihood parameters deviate from posterior distributions

"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it

Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?

Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?

What is a clear way to write a bar that has an extra beat?

How do I gain back my faith in my PhD degree?

How to draw a waving flag in TikZ

How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?

How does quantile regression compare to logistic regression with the variable split at the quantile?

I'm flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?

What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?

If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?

Which country benefited the most from UN Security Council vetoes?

Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?

Watching something be written to a file live with tail

Does detail obscure or enhance action?

Approximately how much travel time was saved by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869?

Filter any system log file by date or date range



Convergence for the norm of a sequence in $ell^{infty}$


$ell^infty$ and $ell^1$When $ell^2$-convergence implies $ell^1$- convergence?Do sequences in $ell^p$ belong to some $ell^q$ for $q<p$?Showing a sequence is in $ell^2$Limit for sequence $a_{m+n}leq a_m+a_n$Show $Tx in ell ^2$ for every $x in ell ^{infty}$Find $|T|_{ell^infty rightarrow ell^2}$Finding the “operatorial” norm of an operatorShowing that $a_n in ell^{infty}$Why ${xinell^infty mid |x|_{ell^infty }leq 1}$ is not completely bounded?













0












$begingroup$


I still don't know if the statement below is true. It seems to be true but I couldn't find a proof. The statement is the following: for each $n geq 1$, let $x_n = (a_1(n),a_2(n),ldots,a_n(n),0,0,ldots) in ell^{infty}$, where $ell^{infty}$ is defined to be the space of all bounded sequences. If for any $1 leq k leq n$, $a_k(n) rightarrow 0$ as $n rightarrow infty$ then $||x_n||_{infty} = sup (a_1(n),a_2(n),ldots,a_n(n),0,0,ldots) rightarrow 0$ as $n rightarrow infty$? Any help is welcome.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I still don't know if the statement below is true. It seems to be true but I couldn't find a proof. The statement is the following: for each $n geq 1$, let $x_n = (a_1(n),a_2(n),ldots,a_n(n),0,0,ldots) in ell^{infty}$, where $ell^{infty}$ is defined to be the space of all bounded sequences. If for any $1 leq k leq n$, $a_k(n) rightarrow 0$ as $n rightarrow infty$ then $||x_n||_{infty} = sup (a_1(n),a_2(n),ldots,a_n(n),0,0,ldots) rightarrow 0$ as $n rightarrow infty$? Any help is welcome.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I still don't know if the statement below is true. It seems to be true but I couldn't find a proof. The statement is the following: for each $n geq 1$, let $x_n = (a_1(n),a_2(n),ldots,a_n(n),0,0,ldots) in ell^{infty}$, where $ell^{infty}$ is defined to be the space of all bounded sequences. If for any $1 leq k leq n$, $a_k(n) rightarrow 0$ as $n rightarrow infty$ then $||x_n||_{infty} = sup (a_1(n),a_2(n),ldots,a_n(n),0,0,ldots) rightarrow 0$ as $n rightarrow infty$? Any help is welcome.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I still don't know if the statement below is true. It seems to be true but I couldn't find a proof. The statement is the following: for each $n geq 1$, let $x_n = (a_1(n),a_2(n),ldots,a_n(n),0,0,ldots) in ell^{infty}$, where $ell^{infty}$ is defined to be the space of all bounded sequences. If for any $1 leq k leq n$, $a_k(n) rightarrow 0$ as $n rightarrow infty$ then $||x_n||_{infty} = sup (a_1(n),a_2(n),ldots,a_n(n),0,0,ldots) rightarrow 0$ as $n rightarrow infty$? Any help is welcome.







      real-analysis functional-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 19 at 16:21









      JeromeJerome

      1




      1






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          This is not true. Define
          $$a_{k}(n)=begin{cases}1text{ if }0leq nleq 2k\ 0text{ if }n>2kend{cases}.$$
          Then $|x_{n}|_{infty}=1$ for all $n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Also doesn't work. For a fixed $n > 1$, $a_{n-1}(n) = 1$ which does not converge to zero and this is on assumptions.
            $endgroup$
            – Jerome
            Mar 19 at 16:41










          • $begingroup$
            @Jerome: No, it is not. The convergence is for a fixed $k$.
            $endgroup$
            – tomasz
            Mar 19 at 18:23



















          1












          $begingroup$

          Hint: Consider $a_k(n):=ndelta_{k,n}$ (this is Kronecker delta).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            In the assumptions, $a_n(n) rightarrow 0$. In your example, $a_n(n) = n delta_{n,n} = n$ does not converge to zero.
            $endgroup$
            – Jerome
            Mar 19 at 16:34










          • $begingroup$
            @Jerome: No. in the assumptions, for every $k$, you have $a_k(n)to 0$. In my example, $a_k(n)=0$ for all $n>k$, so in particular, $a_k(n)to 0$.
            $endgroup$
            – tomasz
            Mar 19 at 18:21














          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154276%2fconvergence-for-the-norm-of-a-sequence-in-ell-infty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          This is not true. Define
          $$a_{k}(n)=begin{cases}1text{ if }0leq nleq 2k\ 0text{ if }n>2kend{cases}.$$
          Then $|x_{n}|_{infty}=1$ for all $n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Also doesn't work. For a fixed $n > 1$, $a_{n-1}(n) = 1$ which does not converge to zero and this is on assumptions.
            $endgroup$
            – Jerome
            Mar 19 at 16:41










          • $begingroup$
            @Jerome: No, it is not. The convergence is for a fixed $k$.
            $endgroup$
            – tomasz
            Mar 19 at 18:23
















          1












          $begingroup$

          This is not true. Define
          $$a_{k}(n)=begin{cases}1text{ if }0leq nleq 2k\ 0text{ if }n>2kend{cases}.$$
          Then $|x_{n}|_{infty}=1$ for all $n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Also doesn't work. For a fixed $n > 1$, $a_{n-1}(n) = 1$ which does not converge to zero and this is on assumptions.
            $endgroup$
            – Jerome
            Mar 19 at 16:41










          • $begingroup$
            @Jerome: No, it is not. The convergence is for a fixed $k$.
            $endgroup$
            – tomasz
            Mar 19 at 18:23














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          This is not true. Define
          $$a_{k}(n)=begin{cases}1text{ if }0leq nleq 2k\ 0text{ if }n>2kend{cases}.$$
          Then $|x_{n}|_{infty}=1$ for all $n$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          This is not true. Define
          $$a_{k}(n)=begin{cases}1text{ if }0leq nleq 2k\ 0text{ if }n>2kend{cases}.$$
          Then $|x_{n}|_{infty}=1$ for all $n$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 19 at 16:25









          Floris ClaassensFloris Claassens

          1,33229




          1,33229












          • $begingroup$
            Also doesn't work. For a fixed $n > 1$, $a_{n-1}(n) = 1$ which does not converge to zero and this is on assumptions.
            $endgroup$
            – Jerome
            Mar 19 at 16:41










          • $begingroup$
            @Jerome: No, it is not. The convergence is for a fixed $k$.
            $endgroup$
            – tomasz
            Mar 19 at 18:23


















          • $begingroup$
            Also doesn't work. For a fixed $n > 1$, $a_{n-1}(n) = 1$ which does not converge to zero and this is on assumptions.
            $endgroup$
            – Jerome
            Mar 19 at 16:41










          • $begingroup$
            @Jerome: No, it is not. The convergence is for a fixed $k$.
            $endgroup$
            – tomasz
            Mar 19 at 18:23
















          $begingroup$
          Also doesn't work. For a fixed $n > 1$, $a_{n-1}(n) = 1$ which does not converge to zero and this is on assumptions.
          $endgroup$
          – Jerome
          Mar 19 at 16:41




          $begingroup$
          Also doesn't work. For a fixed $n > 1$, $a_{n-1}(n) = 1$ which does not converge to zero and this is on assumptions.
          $endgroup$
          – Jerome
          Mar 19 at 16:41












          $begingroup$
          @Jerome: No, it is not. The convergence is for a fixed $k$.
          $endgroup$
          – tomasz
          Mar 19 at 18:23




          $begingroup$
          @Jerome: No, it is not. The convergence is for a fixed $k$.
          $endgroup$
          – tomasz
          Mar 19 at 18:23











          1












          $begingroup$

          Hint: Consider $a_k(n):=ndelta_{k,n}$ (this is Kronecker delta).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            In the assumptions, $a_n(n) rightarrow 0$. In your example, $a_n(n) = n delta_{n,n} = n$ does not converge to zero.
            $endgroup$
            – Jerome
            Mar 19 at 16:34










          • $begingroup$
            @Jerome: No. in the assumptions, for every $k$, you have $a_k(n)to 0$. In my example, $a_k(n)=0$ for all $n>k$, so in particular, $a_k(n)to 0$.
            $endgroup$
            – tomasz
            Mar 19 at 18:21


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Hint: Consider $a_k(n):=ndelta_{k,n}$ (this is Kronecker delta).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            In the assumptions, $a_n(n) rightarrow 0$. In your example, $a_n(n) = n delta_{n,n} = n$ does not converge to zero.
            $endgroup$
            – Jerome
            Mar 19 at 16:34










          • $begingroup$
            @Jerome: No. in the assumptions, for every $k$, you have $a_k(n)to 0$. In my example, $a_k(n)=0$ for all $n>k$, so in particular, $a_k(n)to 0$.
            $endgroup$
            – tomasz
            Mar 19 at 18:21
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Hint: Consider $a_k(n):=ndelta_{k,n}$ (this is Kronecker delta).






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Hint: Consider $a_k(n):=ndelta_{k,n}$ (this is Kronecker delta).







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 19 at 16:30









          tomasztomasz

          24k23482




          24k23482












          • $begingroup$
            In the assumptions, $a_n(n) rightarrow 0$. In your example, $a_n(n) = n delta_{n,n} = n$ does not converge to zero.
            $endgroup$
            – Jerome
            Mar 19 at 16:34










          • $begingroup$
            @Jerome: No. in the assumptions, for every $k$, you have $a_k(n)to 0$. In my example, $a_k(n)=0$ for all $n>k$, so in particular, $a_k(n)to 0$.
            $endgroup$
            – tomasz
            Mar 19 at 18:21




















          • $begingroup$
            In the assumptions, $a_n(n) rightarrow 0$. In your example, $a_n(n) = n delta_{n,n} = n$ does not converge to zero.
            $endgroup$
            – Jerome
            Mar 19 at 16:34










          • $begingroup$
            @Jerome: No. in the assumptions, for every $k$, you have $a_k(n)to 0$. In my example, $a_k(n)=0$ for all $n>k$, so in particular, $a_k(n)to 0$.
            $endgroup$
            – tomasz
            Mar 19 at 18:21


















          $begingroup$
          In the assumptions, $a_n(n) rightarrow 0$. In your example, $a_n(n) = n delta_{n,n} = n$ does not converge to zero.
          $endgroup$
          – Jerome
          Mar 19 at 16:34




          $begingroup$
          In the assumptions, $a_n(n) rightarrow 0$. In your example, $a_n(n) = n delta_{n,n} = n$ does not converge to zero.
          $endgroup$
          – Jerome
          Mar 19 at 16:34












          $begingroup$
          @Jerome: No. in the assumptions, for every $k$, you have $a_k(n)to 0$. In my example, $a_k(n)=0$ for all $n>k$, so in particular, $a_k(n)to 0$.
          $endgroup$
          – tomasz
          Mar 19 at 18:21






          $begingroup$
          @Jerome: No. in the assumptions, for every $k$, you have $a_k(n)to 0$. In my example, $a_k(n)=0$ for all $n>k$, so in particular, $a_k(n)to 0$.
          $endgroup$
          – tomasz
          Mar 19 at 18:21




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154276%2fconvergence-for-the-norm-of-a-sequence-in-ell-infty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Nidaros erkebispedøme

          Birsay

          Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...