Let $x in X$. Show that the subset ${x} subset X$ is closed with respect to $tau(d)$Show that the infinite...
What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?
"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it
Malcev's paper "On a class of homogeneous spaces" in English
What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?
Does an object always see its latest internal state irrespective of thread?
Why is Minecraft giving an OpenGL error?
How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?
I'm flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months
How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?
NMaximize is not converging to a solution
Meaning of に in 本当に
Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?
Codimension of non-flat locus
Fully-Firstable Anagram Sets
Character reincarnated...as a snail
What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?
How to draw a waving flag in TikZ
Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?
How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?
Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?
tikz convert color string to hex value
Convert two switches to a dual stack, and add outlet - possible here?
Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?
If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?
Let $x in X$. Show that the subset ${x} subset X$ is closed with respect to $tau(d)$
Show that the infinite intersection of nested non-empty closed subsets of a compact space is not emptyIntersection of topologiesIt is the power set of $Bbb R$ a topology of $Bbb R$?Let $X$ be an infinite set. Show that $tau={{emptyset}}cup{A:A^ctext{ is finite}}$ is a topology on $X$.Prove that an uncountable space with the countable-closed topology satisfies the countable chain condition.Show that $tau$ is a TopologyLet X a set not empty and (X,d) a metric space, prove the intersection of a family of closed sets are closed.$Ainoverline{tau}iffforall ain A-E,exists Bintau,ain Bsubset A$ defines a topologyWhat is the standard topology of real line? Why is $(0,1)$ called open but $[0,1]$ not open on this topology?show that the finite intersection of open sets is non empty. for the cocountable Topology.
$begingroup$
Let $x in X$. Show that the subset ${x} subset X$ is closed with respect to $tau(d)$
To solve this problem I have looked at properties of closed sets:
$a)$ The empty set $emptyset$ and the whole space $X$ are closed.
$b)$ If $A subset X$ and $B subset X$ are closed, so is their union $A
cup B$.
$c)$ Let $I$ be a set and let $(A_i)_{i in I}$ be a family of closed subsets of $X$. Then their intersection $bigcap_{i in I} A_i$ is closed as well.
To show that the empty set is closed, we have to see that $X$ $emptyset$ is open, and $X = X$ $emptyset$ is open in any topology by definition. Likewise, $X$ $X = emptyset$ is open, hence $X$ is closed.
Not sure how to answer $a)$ and $b)$
Thanks in advance.
general-topology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $x in X$. Show that the subset ${x} subset X$ is closed with respect to $tau(d)$
To solve this problem I have looked at properties of closed sets:
$a)$ The empty set $emptyset$ and the whole space $X$ are closed.
$b)$ If $A subset X$ and $B subset X$ are closed, so is their union $A
cup B$.
$c)$ Let $I$ be a set and let $(A_i)_{i in I}$ be a family of closed subsets of $X$. Then their intersection $bigcap_{i in I} A_i$ is closed as well.
To show that the empty set is closed, we have to see that $X$ $emptyset$ is open, and $X = X$ $emptyset$ is open in any topology by definition. Likewise, $X$ $X = emptyset$ is open, hence $X$ is closed.
Not sure how to answer $a)$ and $b)$
Thanks in advance.
general-topology
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
What is $tau(d)$ ?
$endgroup$
– TheSilverDoe
Mar 19 at 15:56
$begingroup$
You'll need additional restrictions on the topology. For instance, if we give $mathbb{R}$ the topology ${ varnothing, mathbb{R}}$, then singletons ${x}$ will not be closed. Is $X$ supposed to be either $T_1$ or Hausdorff?
$endgroup$
– rolandcyp
Mar 19 at 15:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $x in X$. Show that the subset ${x} subset X$ is closed with respect to $tau(d)$
To solve this problem I have looked at properties of closed sets:
$a)$ The empty set $emptyset$ and the whole space $X$ are closed.
$b)$ If $A subset X$ and $B subset X$ are closed, so is their union $A
cup B$.
$c)$ Let $I$ be a set and let $(A_i)_{i in I}$ be a family of closed subsets of $X$. Then their intersection $bigcap_{i in I} A_i$ is closed as well.
To show that the empty set is closed, we have to see that $X$ $emptyset$ is open, and $X = X$ $emptyset$ is open in any topology by definition. Likewise, $X$ $X = emptyset$ is open, hence $X$ is closed.
Not sure how to answer $a)$ and $b)$
Thanks in advance.
general-topology
$endgroup$
Let $x in X$. Show that the subset ${x} subset X$ is closed with respect to $tau(d)$
To solve this problem I have looked at properties of closed sets:
$a)$ The empty set $emptyset$ and the whole space $X$ are closed.
$b)$ If $A subset X$ and $B subset X$ are closed, so is their union $A
cup B$.
$c)$ Let $I$ be a set and let $(A_i)_{i in I}$ be a family of closed subsets of $X$. Then their intersection $bigcap_{i in I} A_i$ is closed as well.
To show that the empty set is closed, we have to see that $X$ $emptyset$ is open, and $X = X$ $emptyset$ is open in any topology by definition. Likewise, $X$ $X = emptyset$ is open, hence $X$ is closed.
Not sure how to answer $a)$ and $b)$
Thanks in advance.
general-topology
general-topology
edited Mar 21 at 11:21
Andrews
1,2812422
1,2812422
asked Mar 19 at 15:51
Ben JonesBen Jones
19511
19511
2
$begingroup$
What is $tau(d)$ ?
$endgroup$
– TheSilverDoe
Mar 19 at 15:56
$begingroup$
You'll need additional restrictions on the topology. For instance, if we give $mathbb{R}$ the topology ${ varnothing, mathbb{R}}$, then singletons ${x}$ will not be closed. Is $X$ supposed to be either $T_1$ or Hausdorff?
$endgroup$
– rolandcyp
Mar 19 at 15:57
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
What is $tau(d)$ ?
$endgroup$
– TheSilverDoe
Mar 19 at 15:56
$begingroup$
You'll need additional restrictions on the topology. For instance, if we give $mathbb{R}$ the topology ${ varnothing, mathbb{R}}$, then singletons ${x}$ will not be closed. Is $X$ supposed to be either $T_1$ or Hausdorff?
$endgroup$
– rolandcyp
Mar 19 at 15:57
2
2
$begingroup$
What is $tau(d)$ ?
$endgroup$
– TheSilverDoe
Mar 19 at 15:56
$begingroup$
What is $tau(d)$ ?
$endgroup$
– TheSilverDoe
Mar 19 at 15:56
$begingroup$
You'll need additional restrictions on the topology. For instance, if we give $mathbb{R}$ the topology ${ varnothing, mathbb{R}}$, then singletons ${x}$ will not be closed. Is $X$ supposed to be either $T_1$ or Hausdorff?
$endgroup$
– rolandcyp
Mar 19 at 15:57
$begingroup$
You'll need additional restrictions on the topology. For instance, if we give $mathbb{R}$ the topology ${ varnothing, mathbb{R}}$, then singletons ${x}$ will not be closed. Is $X$ supposed to be either $T_1$ or Hausdorff?
$endgroup$
– rolandcyp
Mar 19 at 15:57
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For now let $(X,tau)$ be a general topological space. You have already shown that $X$ and $varnothing$ are closed. For (b), let $A$ and $B$ be closed subsets of $X$. To prove that $A cup B$ is closed, we need only check that $(A cup B)^complement = A^complement cap B^complement$ is open. But this is immediate since $A^complement$ and $B^complement$ are open and finite intersections of open sets are open.
Treating (c), let ${A_i}_{i in I}$ be a family of closed subsets of $X$. Then,
begin{align*}
left( bigcap_{i in I} A_i right)^complement = bigcup_{i in I} A_i^complement
end{align*}
is open because arbitrary unions of open sets are open (and every $A_i^complement$ is open by definition). This proves (c).
Now, given an arbitrary topological space $(X,tau)$, it is not true in general that every singleton ${x}$ is closed in $X$. As I pointed out in the comments, if we give $mathbb{R}$ the indiscrete topology ${mathbb{R}, varnothing}$, then every singleton will not be closed in $mathbb{R}$.
Let us also recall the following definition:
Definition. A space $(X,tau)$ is said to be $T_1$ if for any $x,y in X$ with $x neq y$, there exists an open set $U ni x$ that does not contain $y$.
Without assuming that $(X,tau)$ is either Hausdorff or $T_1$, it will be impossible to show that singletons are closed. In fact, the following equivalence holds:
Theorem. Let $(X,tau)$ be a topological space. Then, $(X,tau)$ is $T_1$ if and only if every singleton ${x}$ is closed in $X$.
In light of this theorem, it's clear that one cannot hope to prove what you want without any additional assumptions on the space $(X,tau)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154234%2flet-x-in-x-show-that-the-subset-x-subset-x-is-closed-with-respect-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For now let $(X,tau)$ be a general topological space. You have already shown that $X$ and $varnothing$ are closed. For (b), let $A$ and $B$ be closed subsets of $X$. To prove that $A cup B$ is closed, we need only check that $(A cup B)^complement = A^complement cap B^complement$ is open. But this is immediate since $A^complement$ and $B^complement$ are open and finite intersections of open sets are open.
Treating (c), let ${A_i}_{i in I}$ be a family of closed subsets of $X$. Then,
begin{align*}
left( bigcap_{i in I} A_i right)^complement = bigcup_{i in I} A_i^complement
end{align*}
is open because arbitrary unions of open sets are open (and every $A_i^complement$ is open by definition). This proves (c).
Now, given an arbitrary topological space $(X,tau)$, it is not true in general that every singleton ${x}$ is closed in $X$. As I pointed out in the comments, if we give $mathbb{R}$ the indiscrete topology ${mathbb{R}, varnothing}$, then every singleton will not be closed in $mathbb{R}$.
Let us also recall the following definition:
Definition. A space $(X,tau)$ is said to be $T_1$ if for any $x,y in X$ with $x neq y$, there exists an open set $U ni x$ that does not contain $y$.
Without assuming that $(X,tau)$ is either Hausdorff or $T_1$, it will be impossible to show that singletons are closed. In fact, the following equivalence holds:
Theorem. Let $(X,tau)$ be a topological space. Then, $(X,tau)$ is $T_1$ if and only if every singleton ${x}$ is closed in $X$.
In light of this theorem, it's clear that one cannot hope to prove what you want without any additional assumptions on the space $(X,tau)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For now let $(X,tau)$ be a general topological space. You have already shown that $X$ and $varnothing$ are closed. For (b), let $A$ and $B$ be closed subsets of $X$. To prove that $A cup B$ is closed, we need only check that $(A cup B)^complement = A^complement cap B^complement$ is open. But this is immediate since $A^complement$ and $B^complement$ are open and finite intersections of open sets are open.
Treating (c), let ${A_i}_{i in I}$ be a family of closed subsets of $X$. Then,
begin{align*}
left( bigcap_{i in I} A_i right)^complement = bigcup_{i in I} A_i^complement
end{align*}
is open because arbitrary unions of open sets are open (and every $A_i^complement$ is open by definition). This proves (c).
Now, given an arbitrary topological space $(X,tau)$, it is not true in general that every singleton ${x}$ is closed in $X$. As I pointed out in the comments, if we give $mathbb{R}$ the indiscrete topology ${mathbb{R}, varnothing}$, then every singleton will not be closed in $mathbb{R}$.
Let us also recall the following definition:
Definition. A space $(X,tau)$ is said to be $T_1$ if for any $x,y in X$ with $x neq y$, there exists an open set $U ni x$ that does not contain $y$.
Without assuming that $(X,tau)$ is either Hausdorff or $T_1$, it will be impossible to show that singletons are closed. In fact, the following equivalence holds:
Theorem. Let $(X,tau)$ be a topological space. Then, $(X,tau)$ is $T_1$ if and only if every singleton ${x}$ is closed in $X$.
In light of this theorem, it's clear that one cannot hope to prove what you want without any additional assumptions on the space $(X,tau)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For now let $(X,tau)$ be a general topological space. You have already shown that $X$ and $varnothing$ are closed. For (b), let $A$ and $B$ be closed subsets of $X$. To prove that $A cup B$ is closed, we need only check that $(A cup B)^complement = A^complement cap B^complement$ is open. But this is immediate since $A^complement$ and $B^complement$ are open and finite intersections of open sets are open.
Treating (c), let ${A_i}_{i in I}$ be a family of closed subsets of $X$. Then,
begin{align*}
left( bigcap_{i in I} A_i right)^complement = bigcup_{i in I} A_i^complement
end{align*}
is open because arbitrary unions of open sets are open (and every $A_i^complement$ is open by definition). This proves (c).
Now, given an arbitrary topological space $(X,tau)$, it is not true in general that every singleton ${x}$ is closed in $X$. As I pointed out in the comments, if we give $mathbb{R}$ the indiscrete topology ${mathbb{R}, varnothing}$, then every singleton will not be closed in $mathbb{R}$.
Let us also recall the following definition:
Definition. A space $(X,tau)$ is said to be $T_1$ if for any $x,y in X$ with $x neq y$, there exists an open set $U ni x$ that does not contain $y$.
Without assuming that $(X,tau)$ is either Hausdorff or $T_1$, it will be impossible to show that singletons are closed. In fact, the following equivalence holds:
Theorem. Let $(X,tau)$ be a topological space. Then, $(X,tau)$ is $T_1$ if and only if every singleton ${x}$ is closed in $X$.
In light of this theorem, it's clear that one cannot hope to prove what you want without any additional assumptions on the space $(X,tau)$.
$endgroup$
For now let $(X,tau)$ be a general topological space. You have already shown that $X$ and $varnothing$ are closed. For (b), let $A$ and $B$ be closed subsets of $X$. To prove that $A cup B$ is closed, we need only check that $(A cup B)^complement = A^complement cap B^complement$ is open. But this is immediate since $A^complement$ and $B^complement$ are open and finite intersections of open sets are open.
Treating (c), let ${A_i}_{i in I}$ be a family of closed subsets of $X$. Then,
begin{align*}
left( bigcap_{i in I} A_i right)^complement = bigcup_{i in I} A_i^complement
end{align*}
is open because arbitrary unions of open sets are open (and every $A_i^complement$ is open by definition). This proves (c).
Now, given an arbitrary topological space $(X,tau)$, it is not true in general that every singleton ${x}$ is closed in $X$. As I pointed out in the comments, if we give $mathbb{R}$ the indiscrete topology ${mathbb{R}, varnothing}$, then every singleton will not be closed in $mathbb{R}$.
Let us also recall the following definition:
Definition. A space $(X,tau)$ is said to be $T_1$ if for any $x,y in X$ with $x neq y$, there exists an open set $U ni x$ that does not contain $y$.
Without assuming that $(X,tau)$ is either Hausdorff or $T_1$, it will be impossible to show that singletons are closed. In fact, the following equivalence holds:
Theorem. Let $(X,tau)$ be a topological space. Then, $(X,tau)$ is $T_1$ if and only if every singleton ${x}$ is closed in $X$.
In light of this theorem, it's clear that one cannot hope to prove what you want without any additional assumptions on the space $(X,tau)$.
answered Mar 19 at 16:10
rolandcyprolandcyp
2,234421
2,234421
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154234%2flet-x-in-x-show-that-the-subset-x-subset-x-is-closed-with-respect-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
What is $tau(d)$ ?
$endgroup$
– TheSilverDoe
Mar 19 at 15:56
$begingroup$
You'll need additional restrictions on the topology. For instance, if we give $mathbb{R}$ the topology ${ varnothing, mathbb{R}}$, then singletons ${x}$ will not be closed. Is $X$ supposed to be either $T_1$ or Hausdorff?
$endgroup$
– rolandcyp
Mar 19 at 15:57