How To Find The Unit EigenvectorsKernels and reduced row echelon form - explanationbasis for the solution...

Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?

Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?

tikz convert color string to hex value

Can you really stack all of this on an Opportunity Attack?

How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?

Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?

Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?

How do I deal with an unproductive colleague in a small company?

What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?

Is it possible to run Internet Explorer on OS X El Capitan?

How much of data wrangling is a data scientist's job?

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

Add text to same line using sed

How to efficiently unroll a matrix by value with numpy?

Approximately how much travel time was saved by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869?

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?

Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free

Watching something be written to a file live with tail

Why can't we play rap on piano?

Important Resources for Dark Age Civilizations?

LWC SFDX source push error TypeError: LWC1009: decl.moveTo is not a function

strTok function (thread safe, supports empty tokens, doesn't change string)



How To Find The Unit Eigenvectors


Kernels and reduced row echelon form - explanationbasis for the solution spaceHelp finding eigenvectors?Finding Eigenvectors and EigenvaluesFind eigenvalues and eigenvectors of this matrixFind the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the following square matrixHow to find the eigenvectors?find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the reflection matrix.Finding Eigenvectors [Confused]Finding eigenvectors when one column is zeroHow can I find the eigenvectors for this matrix?













2












$begingroup$


I have the matrix $$begin{pmatrix}3&-9\-9&27end{pmatrix}.$$ I found the eigenvalues of $0$ and $30.$ However, when I try to plug in $0$ for the Eigenvalues and row reduce, I get $0,0$ as my solutions for find $x_1$ and $x_2.$ This is not correct and when I tried to do it with the eigenvalue of $30,$ it also came out to $0,0.$ I know to find the unit you have to take the length of $0$ and $30.$ Any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Tell us the equation you get when trying to solve for $x_1$ and $x_2$ in each case.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Andrews
    Mar 19 at 16:03










  • $begingroup$
    something like $[sqrt{3}, -3sqrt{3}]$ will be eigenvector of non zero eigenvalue. because the matrix is obviously outer product with itself. then obviously one with 0 eigenvalue for the rest of the space.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 19 at 16:03












  • $begingroup$
    So I have to solve for x and y (or x_1 and x_2). So I have the equations for eigenvalue of 0, 3x-9y=0 and -9x+27y=0. If I row reduce I get, x=0 and y=0 which is incorrect. If I plug in 30 for the equations I get, -27x-9y=0 and -9x+54y=0. Row reducing that gives me 0,0 which is also incorrect.
    $endgroup$
    – Amy Kulp
    Mar 19 at 16:10
















2












$begingroup$


I have the matrix $$begin{pmatrix}3&-9\-9&27end{pmatrix}.$$ I found the eigenvalues of $0$ and $30.$ However, when I try to plug in $0$ for the Eigenvalues and row reduce, I get $0,0$ as my solutions for find $x_1$ and $x_2.$ This is not correct and when I tried to do it with the eigenvalue of $30,$ it also came out to $0,0.$ I know to find the unit you have to take the length of $0$ and $30.$ Any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Tell us the equation you get when trying to solve for $x_1$ and $x_2$ in each case.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Andrews
    Mar 19 at 16:03










  • $begingroup$
    something like $[sqrt{3}, -3sqrt{3}]$ will be eigenvector of non zero eigenvalue. because the matrix is obviously outer product with itself. then obviously one with 0 eigenvalue for the rest of the space.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 19 at 16:03












  • $begingroup$
    So I have to solve for x and y (or x_1 and x_2). So I have the equations for eigenvalue of 0, 3x-9y=0 and -9x+27y=0. If I row reduce I get, x=0 and y=0 which is incorrect. If I plug in 30 for the equations I get, -27x-9y=0 and -9x+54y=0. Row reducing that gives me 0,0 which is also incorrect.
    $endgroup$
    – Amy Kulp
    Mar 19 at 16:10














2












2








2





$begingroup$


I have the matrix $$begin{pmatrix}3&-9\-9&27end{pmatrix}.$$ I found the eigenvalues of $0$ and $30.$ However, when I try to plug in $0$ for the Eigenvalues and row reduce, I get $0,0$ as my solutions for find $x_1$ and $x_2.$ This is not correct and when I tried to do it with the eigenvalue of $30,$ it also came out to $0,0.$ I know to find the unit you have to take the length of $0$ and $30.$ Any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have the matrix $$begin{pmatrix}3&-9\-9&27end{pmatrix}.$$ I found the eigenvalues of $0$ and $30.$ However, when I try to plug in $0$ for the Eigenvalues and row reduce, I get $0,0$ as my solutions for find $x_1$ and $x_2.$ This is not correct and when I tried to do it with the eigenvalue of $30,$ it also came out to $0,0.$ I know to find the unit you have to take the length of $0$ and $30.$ Any help would be appreciated.







linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 19 at 16:10









José Carlos Santos

172k23133241




172k23133241










asked Mar 19 at 15:53









Amy KulpAmy Kulp

426




426












  • $begingroup$
    Tell us the equation you get when trying to solve for $x_1$ and $x_2$ in each case.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Andrews
    Mar 19 at 16:03










  • $begingroup$
    something like $[sqrt{3}, -3sqrt{3}]$ will be eigenvector of non zero eigenvalue. because the matrix is obviously outer product with itself. then obviously one with 0 eigenvalue for the rest of the space.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 19 at 16:03












  • $begingroup$
    So I have to solve for x and y (or x_1 and x_2). So I have the equations for eigenvalue of 0, 3x-9y=0 and -9x+27y=0. If I row reduce I get, x=0 and y=0 which is incorrect. If I plug in 30 for the equations I get, -27x-9y=0 and -9x+54y=0. Row reducing that gives me 0,0 which is also incorrect.
    $endgroup$
    – Amy Kulp
    Mar 19 at 16:10


















  • $begingroup$
    Tell us the equation you get when trying to solve for $x_1$ and $x_2$ in each case.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Andrews
    Mar 19 at 16:03










  • $begingroup$
    something like $[sqrt{3}, -3sqrt{3}]$ will be eigenvector of non zero eigenvalue. because the matrix is obviously outer product with itself. then obviously one with 0 eigenvalue for the rest of the space.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 19 at 16:03












  • $begingroup$
    So I have to solve for x and y (or x_1 and x_2). So I have the equations for eigenvalue of 0, 3x-9y=0 and -9x+27y=0. If I row reduce I get, x=0 and y=0 which is incorrect. If I plug in 30 for the equations I get, -27x-9y=0 and -9x+54y=0. Row reducing that gives me 0,0 which is also incorrect.
    $endgroup$
    – Amy Kulp
    Mar 19 at 16:10
















$begingroup$
Tell us the equation you get when trying to solve for $x_1$ and $x_2$ in each case.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Mar 19 at 16:03




$begingroup$
Tell us the equation you get when trying to solve for $x_1$ and $x_2$ in each case.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Mar 19 at 16:03












$begingroup$
something like $[sqrt{3}, -3sqrt{3}]$ will be eigenvector of non zero eigenvalue. because the matrix is obviously outer product with itself. then obviously one with 0 eigenvalue for the rest of the space.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 19 at 16:03






$begingroup$
something like $[sqrt{3}, -3sqrt{3}]$ will be eigenvector of non zero eigenvalue. because the matrix is obviously outer product with itself. then obviously one with 0 eigenvalue for the rest of the space.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 19 at 16:03














$begingroup$
So I have to solve for x and y (or x_1 and x_2). So I have the equations for eigenvalue of 0, 3x-9y=0 and -9x+27y=0. If I row reduce I get, x=0 and y=0 which is incorrect. If I plug in 30 for the equations I get, -27x-9y=0 and -9x+54y=0. Row reducing that gives me 0,0 which is also incorrect.
$endgroup$
– Amy Kulp
Mar 19 at 16:10




$begingroup$
So I have to solve for x and y (or x_1 and x_2). So I have the equations for eigenvalue of 0, 3x-9y=0 and -9x+27y=0. If I row reduce I get, x=0 and y=0 which is incorrect. If I plug in 30 for the equations I get, -27x-9y=0 and -9x+54y=0. Row reducing that gives me 0,0 which is also incorrect.
$endgroup$
– Amy Kulp
Mar 19 at 16:10










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

In oerder to get an eigenvector whose eigenvalue is $0$, you solve the system$$left{begin{array}{l}3x-9y=0\-9x+27y=0end{array}right.$$Since the second equation is just the first one times $-3$, this is equivalent to having to deal only with the first equation. So, take $x=3$ and $y=1$, for instance. Problem: $(3,1)$ is not unitary. So, divide this vector by its norm, thereby getting $left(frac3{sqrt{10}},frac1{sqrt{10}}right)$.



The case of the other eigenvalue is similar.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Wow you are so fast.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 19 at 16:06










  • $begingroup$
    Sometimes I am, but this time my answer appeared only 9 minutes after the question.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Mar 19 at 16:09










  • $begingroup$
    I'm confused as to why or how you got x=3 and y=1. When I row reduce, I keep getting 0,0.
    $endgroup$
    – Amy Kulp
    Mar 19 at 16:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I had the equation $3x-9y=0(iff x=3y)$ and so I took $y=1$ and $x=3$. That's all.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Mar 19 at 16:12



















2












$begingroup$

Your answers quite make sense. According to the definition$$Av=lambda v$$where the notation is self-explaining. If $lambda=0$ for the matrix in this question we obtain$$begin{pmatrix}3&-9\-9&27end{pmatrix}begin{pmatrix}v_1\v_2end{pmatrix}=0$$which leads to only one independent equality $v_1=3v_2$ among which only $$begin{pmatrix}v_1\v_2end{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix}{3over sqrt{10}}\{1over sqrt{10}}end{pmatrix}$$has unit norm and the other answers are only a simple factor of this one. Following the same logic for $lambda=30$, we get to $$begin{pmatrix}v_1\v_2end{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix}{1over sqrt{10}}\-{3over sqrt{10}}end{pmatrix}$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    The zero vector is always a solution to the homogeneous equation. What you’re looking for here are non-zero solutions.



    If you performed the row-reduction correctly for the eigenvalue $0$, you should’ve gotten $$begin{bmatrix}1&-3\0&0end{bmatrix}.$$ Using the method described here you can then read from this matrix that $(3,1)^T$ spans its null space, i.e., is an eigenvector of $0$. The situation for the other eigenvalue will be similar: after row-reduction you’ll have a matrix with one zero row from which you can read a basis for its null space. However, there’s a shortcut: this is a real symmetric matrix, so its eigenspaces are mutually orthogonal. This means that an eigenvector of $30$ is $(1,-3)^T$, which is orthogonal to $(3,1)^T$.



    In fact, for such a small matrix you can find these eigenvectors and eigenvalues by inspection. The null space of a matrix is the orthogonal complement of its row spaceThe latter is obviously spanned by $(3,-9)^T$, so $(9,3)^T$ is an eigenvector with eigenvalue $0$. Alternatively, you might have spotted that $3times$ the first column plus the second yields the zero vector, which means that $(3,1)^T$ is an eigenvector of zero. You get the other eigenvalues “for free” since their sum is equal to the trace of the matrix, and for an eigenvector, you can either use the symmetry of the matrix as above, or notice that the row space of $30I-A$ is also obviously spanned by its first row.



    Once you have an eigenvector for each eigenvalue, simply divide them by the norms to obtain unit vectors. Note, though, that it doesn’t make sense to speak of “the” eigenvectors of a matrix. Any nonzero scalar multiple of an eigenvector is also an eigenvector, so even after normalization, if you have a unit eigenvector $mathbf u$, then $-mathbf u$ is also a unit eigenvector with the same eigenvalue.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      A number, $lambda$, is an eigenvalue for linear transformation, A, if and only if there exist a non-zero vector, v, such that $Av= lambda v$. Certainly, yes, the vector v= <0, 0> satisfies $Av= lambda v$. The question is whether or not there exist non-zero vectors. Here, yes, $lambda= 0$ is an eigenvalue. A vector, $begin{pmatrix}x \ y end{pmatrix}$ is an eigenvalue if and only if $begin{pmatrix}3 & -9 \ -9 & 27end{pmatrix}begin{pmatrix}x \ yend{pmatrix}= begin{pmatrix}3x- 9y \ -9x+ 27yend{pmatrix}= begin{pmatrix} 0x \ 0y end{pmatrix}= begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 0 end{pmatrix}$. So we have 3x- 9y= 0, -9x+ 27y= 0. Yes, x= y= 0 is a solution to this but the whole point of an "eigenvalue" is that there are non-zero solutions. From 3x- 9y= 0, we have 3x= 9y and then x= 3y. Replacing x by 3y in the other equation gives 3(3y)- 97= 9y- 9y= 0 so that any vector $begin{pmatrix}3y \ yend{pmatrix}$ is an eigenvector for any y.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$














        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154239%2fhow-to-find-the-unit-eigenvectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        3












        $begingroup$

        In oerder to get an eigenvector whose eigenvalue is $0$, you solve the system$$left{begin{array}{l}3x-9y=0\-9x+27y=0end{array}right.$$Since the second equation is just the first one times $-3$, this is equivalent to having to deal only with the first equation. So, take $x=3$ and $y=1$, for instance. Problem: $(3,1)$ is not unitary. So, divide this vector by its norm, thereby getting $left(frac3{sqrt{10}},frac1{sqrt{10}}right)$.



        The case of the other eigenvalue is similar.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          Wow you are so fast.
          $endgroup$
          – mathreadler
          Mar 19 at 16:06










        • $begingroup$
          Sometimes I am, but this time my answer appeared only 9 minutes after the question.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Mar 19 at 16:09










        • $begingroup$
          I'm confused as to why or how you got x=3 and y=1. When I row reduce, I keep getting 0,0.
          $endgroup$
          – Amy Kulp
          Mar 19 at 16:11






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          I had the equation $3x-9y=0(iff x=3y)$ and so I took $y=1$ and $x=3$. That's all.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Mar 19 at 16:12
















        3












        $begingroup$

        In oerder to get an eigenvector whose eigenvalue is $0$, you solve the system$$left{begin{array}{l}3x-9y=0\-9x+27y=0end{array}right.$$Since the second equation is just the first one times $-3$, this is equivalent to having to deal only with the first equation. So, take $x=3$ and $y=1$, for instance. Problem: $(3,1)$ is not unitary. So, divide this vector by its norm, thereby getting $left(frac3{sqrt{10}},frac1{sqrt{10}}right)$.



        The case of the other eigenvalue is similar.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          Wow you are so fast.
          $endgroup$
          – mathreadler
          Mar 19 at 16:06










        • $begingroup$
          Sometimes I am, but this time my answer appeared only 9 minutes after the question.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Mar 19 at 16:09










        • $begingroup$
          I'm confused as to why or how you got x=3 and y=1. When I row reduce, I keep getting 0,0.
          $endgroup$
          – Amy Kulp
          Mar 19 at 16:11






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          I had the equation $3x-9y=0(iff x=3y)$ and so I took $y=1$ and $x=3$. That's all.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Mar 19 at 16:12














        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        In oerder to get an eigenvector whose eigenvalue is $0$, you solve the system$$left{begin{array}{l}3x-9y=0\-9x+27y=0end{array}right.$$Since the second equation is just the first one times $-3$, this is equivalent to having to deal only with the first equation. So, take $x=3$ and $y=1$, for instance. Problem: $(3,1)$ is not unitary. So, divide this vector by its norm, thereby getting $left(frac3{sqrt{10}},frac1{sqrt{10}}right)$.



        The case of the other eigenvalue is similar.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        In oerder to get an eigenvector whose eigenvalue is $0$, you solve the system$$left{begin{array}{l}3x-9y=0\-9x+27y=0end{array}right.$$Since the second equation is just the first one times $-3$, this is equivalent to having to deal only with the first equation. So, take $x=3$ and $y=1$, for instance. Problem: $(3,1)$ is not unitary. So, divide this vector by its norm, thereby getting $left(frac3{sqrt{10}},frac1{sqrt{10}}right)$.



        The case of the other eigenvalue is similar.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 19 at 16:03









        José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

        172k23133241




        172k23133241












        • $begingroup$
          Wow you are so fast.
          $endgroup$
          – mathreadler
          Mar 19 at 16:06










        • $begingroup$
          Sometimes I am, but this time my answer appeared only 9 minutes after the question.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Mar 19 at 16:09










        • $begingroup$
          I'm confused as to why or how you got x=3 and y=1. When I row reduce, I keep getting 0,0.
          $endgroup$
          – Amy Kulp
          Mar 19 at 16:11






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          I had the equation $3x-9y=0(iff x=3y)$ and so I took $y=1$ and $x=3$. That's all.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Mar 19 at 16:12


















        • $begingroup$
          Wow you are so fast.
          $endgroup$
          – mathreadler
          Mar 19 at 16:06










        • $begingroup$
          Sometimes I am, but this time my answer appeared only 9 minutes after the question.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Mar 19 at 16:09










        • $begingroup$
          I'm confused as to why or how you got x=3 and y=1. When I row reduce, I keep getting 0,0.
          $endgroup$
          – Amy Kulp
          Mar 19 at 16:11






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          I had the equation $3x-9y=0(iff x=3y)$ and so I took $y=1$ and $x=3$. That's all.
          $endgroup$
          – José Carlos Santos
          Mar 19 at 16:12
















        $begingroup$
        Wow you are so fast.
        $endgroup$
        – mathreadler
        Mar 19 at 16:06




        $begingroup$
        Wow you are so fast.
        $endgroup$
        – mathreadler
        Mar 19 at 16:06












        $begingroup$
        Sometimes I am, but this time my answer appeared only 9 minutes after the question.
        $endgroup$
        – José Carlos Santos
        Mar 19 at 16:09




        $begingroup$
        Sometimes I am, but this time my answer appeared only 9 minutes after the question.
        $endgroup$
        – José Carlos Santos
        Mar 19 at 16:09












        $begingroup$
        I'm confused as to why or how you got x=3 and y=1. When I row reduce, I keep getting 0,0.
        $endgroup$
        – Amy Kulp
        Mar 19 at 16:11




        $begingroup$
        I'm confused as to why or how you got x=3 and y=1. When I row reduce, I keep getting 0,0.
        $endgroup$
        – Amy Kulp
        Mar 19 at 16:11




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        I had the equation $3x-9y=0(iff x=3y)$ and so I took $y=1$ and $x=3$. That's all.
        $endgroup$
        – José Carlos Santos
        Mar 19 at 16:12




        $begingroup$
        I had the equation $3x-9y=0(iff x=3y)$ and so I took $y=1$ and $x=3$. That's all.
        $endgroup$
        – José Carlos Santos
        Mar 19 at 16:12











        2












        $begingroup$

        Your answers quite make sense. According to the definition$$Av=lambda v$$where the notation is self-explaining. If $lambda=0$ for the matrix in this question we obtain$$begin{pmatrix}3&-9\-9&27end{pmatrix}begin{pmatrix}v_1\v_2end{pmatrix}=0$$which leads to only one independent equality $v_1=3v_2$ among which only $$begin{pmatrix}v_1\v_2end{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix}{3over sqrt{10}}\{1over sqrt{10}}end{pmatrix}$$has unit norm and the other answers are only a simple factor of this one. Following the same logic for $lambda=30$, we get to $$begin{pmatrix}v_1\v_2end{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix}{1over sqrt{10}}\-{3over sqrt{10}}end{pmatrix}$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Your answers quite make sense. According to the definition$$Av=lambda v$$where the notation is self-explaining. If $lambda=0$ for the matrix in this question we obtain$$begin{pmatrix}3&-9\-9&27end{pmatrix}begin{pmatrix}v_1\v_2end{pmatrix}=0$$which leads to only one independent equality $v_1=3v_2$ among which only $$begin{pmatrix}v_1\v_2end{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix}{3over sqrt{10}}\{1over sqrt{10}}end{pmatrix}$$has unit norm and the other answers are only a simple factor of this one. Following the same logic for $lambda=30$, we get to $$begin{pmatrix}v_1\v_2end{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix}{1over sqrt{10}}\-{3over sqrt{10}}end{pmatrix}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Your answers quite make sense. According to the definition$$Av=lambda v$$where the notation is self-explaining. If $lambda=0$ for the matrix in this question we obtain$$begin{pmatrix}3&-9\-9&27end{pmatrix}begin{pmatrix}v_1\v_2end{pmatrix}=0$$which leads to only one independent equality $v_1=3v_2$ among which only $$begin{pmatrix}v_1\v_2end{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix}{3over sqrt{10}}\{1over sqrt{10}}end{pmatrix}$$has unit norm and the other answers are only a simple factor of this one. Following the same logic for $lambda=30$, we get to $$begin{pmatrix}v_1\v_2end{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix}{1over sqrt{10}}\-{3over sqrt{10}}end{pmatrix}$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Your answers quite make sense. According to the definition$$Av=lambda v$$where the notation is self-explaining. If $lambda=0$ for the matrix in this question we obtain$$begin{pmatrix}3&-9\-9&27end{pmatrix}begin{pmatrix}v_1\v_2end{pmatrix}=0$$which leads to only one independent equality $v_1=3v_2$ among which only $$begin{pmatrix}v_1\v_2end{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix}{3over sqrt{10}}\{1over sqrt{10}}end{pmatrix}$$has unit norm and the other answers are only a simple factor of this one. Following the same logic for $lambda=30$, we get to $$begin{pmatrix}v_1\v_2end{pmatrix}=begin{pmatrix}{1over sqrt{10}}\-{3over sqrt{10}}end{pmatrix}$$







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Mar 19 at 16:42









            Mostafa AyazMostafa Ayaz

            18.2k31040




            18.2k31040























                1












                $begingroup$

                The zero vector is always a solution to the homogeneous equation. What you’re looking for here are non-zero solutions.



                If you performed the row-reduction correctly for the eigenvalue $0$, you should’ve gotten $$begin{bmatrix}1&-3\0&0end{bmatrix}.$$ Using the method described here you can then read from this matrix that $(3,1)^T$ spans its null space, i.e., is an eigenvector of $0$. The situation for the other eigenvalue will be similar: after row-reduction you’ll have a matrix with one zero row from which you can read a basis for its null space. However, there’s a shortcut: this is a real symmetric matrix, so its eigenspaces are mutually orthogonal. This means that an eigenvector of $30$ is $(1,-3)^T$, which is orthogonal to $(3,1)^T$.



                In fact, for such a small matrix you can find these eigenvectors and eigenvalues by inspection. The null space of a matrix is the orthogonal complement of its row spaceThe latter is obviously spanned by $(3,-9)^T$, so $(9,3)^T$ is an eigenvector with eigenvalue $0$. Alternatively, you might have spotted that $3times$ the first column plus the second yields the zero vector, which means that $(3,1)^T$ is an eigenvector of zero. You get the other eigenvalues “for free” since their sum is equal to the trace of the matrix, and for an eigenvector, you can either use the symmetry of the matrix as above, or notice that the row space of $30I-A$ is also obviously spanned by its first row.



                Once you have an eigenvector for each eigenvalue, simply divide them by the norms to obtain unit vectors. Note, though, that it doesn’t make sense to speak of “the” eigenvectors of a matrix. Any nonzero scalar multiple of an eigenvector is also an eigenvector, so even after normalization, if you have a unit eigenvector $mathbf u$, then $-mathbf u$ is also a unit eigenvector with the same eigenvalue.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  The zero vector is always a solution to the homogeneous equation. What you’re looking for here are non-zero solutions.



                  If you performed the row-reduction correctly for the eigenvalue $0$, you should’ve gotten $$begin{bmatrix}1&-3\0&0end{bmatrix}.$$ Using the method described here you can then read from this matrix that $(3,1)^T$ spans its null space, i.e., is an eigenvector of $0$. The situation for the other eigenvalue will be similar: after row-reduction you’ll have a matrix with one zero row from which you can read a basis for its null space. However, there’s a shortcut: this is a real symmetric matrix, so its eigenspaces are mutually orthogonal. This means that an eigenvector of $30$ is $(1,-3)^T$, which is orthogonal to $(3,1)^T$.



                  In fact, for such a small matrix you can find these eigenvectors and eigenvalues by inspection. The null space of a matrix is the orthogonal complement of its row spaceThe latter is obviously spanned by $(3,-9)^T$, so $(9,3)^T$ is an eigenvector with eigenvalue $0$. Alternatively, you might have spotted that $3times$ the first column plus the second yields the zero vector, which means that $(3,1)^T$ is an eigenvector of zero. You get the other eigenvalues “for free” since their sum is equal to the trace of the matrix, and for an eigenvector, you can either use the symmetry of the matrix as above, or notice that the row space of $30I-A$ is also obviously spanned by its first row.



                  Once you have an eigenvector for each eigenvalue, simply divide them by the norms to obtain unit vectors. Note, though, that it doesn’t make sense to speak of “the” eigenvectors of a matrix. Any nonzero scalar multiple of an eigenvector is also an eigenvector, so even after normalization, if you have a unit eigenvector $mathbf u$, then $-mathbf u$ is also a unit eigenvector with the same eigenvalue.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    The zero vector is always a solution to the homogeneous equation. What you’re looking for here are non-zero solutions.



                    If you performed the row-reduction correctly for the eigenvalue $0$, you should’ve gotten $$begin{bmatrix}1&-3\0&0end{bmatrix}.$$ Using the method described here you can then read from this matrix that $(3,1)^T$ spans its null space, i.e., is an eigenvector of $0$. The situation for the other eigenvalue will be similar: after row-reduction you’ll have a matrix with one zero row from which you can read a basis for its null space. However, there’s a shortcut: this is a real symmetric matrix, so its eigenspaces are mutually orthogonal. This means that an eigenvector of $30$ is $(1,-3)^T$, which is orthogonal to $(3,1)^T$.



                    In fact, for such a small matrix you can find these eigenvectors and eigenvalues by inspection. The null space of a matrix is the orthogonal complement of its row spaceThe latter is obviously spanned by $(3,-9)^T$, so $(9,3)^T$ is an eigenvector with eigenvalue $0$. Alternatively, you might have spotted that $3times$ the first column plus the second yields the zero vector, which means that $(3,1)^T$ is an eigenvector of zero. You get the other eigenvalues “for free” since their sum is equal to the trace of the matrix, and for an eigenvector, you can either use the symmetry of the matrix as above, or notice that the row space of $30I-A$ is also obviously spanned by its first row.



                    Once you have an eigenvector for each eigenvalue, simply divide them by the norms to obtain unit vectors. Note, though, that it doesn’t make sense to speak of “the” eigenvectors of a matrix. Any nonzero scalar multiple of an eigenvector is also an eigenvector, so even after normalization, if you have a unit eigenvector $mathbf u$, then $-mathbf u$ is also a unit eigenvector with the same eigenvalue.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    The zero vector is always a solution to the homogeneous equation. What you’re looking for here are non-zero solutions.



                    If you performed the row-reduction correctly for the eigenvalue $0$, you should’ve gotten $$begin{bmatrix}1&-3\0&0end{bmatrix}.$$ Using the method described here you can then read from this matrix that $(3,1)^T$ spans its null space, i.e., is an eigenvector of $0$. The situation for the other eigenvalue will be similar: after row-reduction you’ll have a matrix with one zero row from which you can read a basis for its null space. However, there’s a shortcut: this is a real symmetric matrix, so its eigenspaces are mutually orthogonal. This means that an eigenvector of $30$ is $(1,-3)^T$, which is orthogonal to $(3,1)^T$.



                    In fact, for such a small matrix you can find these eigenvectors and eigenvalues by inspection. The null space of a matrix is the orthogonal complement of its row spaceThe latter is obviously spanned by $(3,-9)^T$, so $(9,3)^T$ is an eigenvector with eigenvalue $0$. Alternatively, you might have spotted that $3times$ the first column plus the second yields the zero vector, which means that $(3,1)^T$ is an eigenvector of zero. You get the other eigenvalues “for free” since their sum is equal to the trace of the matrix, and for an eigenvector, you can either use the symmetry of the matrix as above, or notice that the row space of $30I-A$ is also obviously spanned by its first row.



                    Once you have an eigenvector for each eigenvalue, simply divide them by the norms to obtain unit vectors. Note, though, that it doesn’t make sense to speak of “the” eigenvectors of a matrix. Any nonzero scalar multiple of an eigenvector is also an eigenvector, so even after normalization, if you have a unit eigenvector $mathbf u$, then $-mathbf u$ is also a unit eigenvector with the same eigenvalue.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Mar 19 at 19:24









                    amdamd

                    31.6k21052




                    31.6k21052























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        A number, $lambda$, is an eigenvalue for linear transformation, A, if and only if there exist a non-zero vector, v, such that $Av= lambda v$. Certainly, yes, the vector v= <0, 0> satisfies $Av= lambda v$. The question is whether or not there exist non-zero vectors. Here, yes, $lambda= 0$ is an eigenvalue. A vector, $begin{pmatrix}x \ y end{pmatrix}$ is an eigenvalue if and only if $begin{pmatrix}3 & -9 \ -9 & 27end{pmatrix}begin{pmatrix}x \ yend{pmatrix}= begin{pmatrix}3x- 9y \ -9x+ 27yend{pmatrix}= begin{pmatrix} 0x \ 0y end{pmatrix}= begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 0 end{pmatrix}$. So we have 3x- 9y= 0, -9x+ 27y= 0. Yes, x= y= 0 is a solution to this but the whole point of an "eigenvalue" is that there are non-zero solutions. From 3x- 9y= 0, we have 3x= 9y and then x= 3y. Replacing x by 3y in the other equation gives 3(3y)- 97= 9y- 9y= 0 so that any vector $begin{pmatrix}3y \ yend{pmatrix}$ is an eigenvector for any y.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          A number, $lambda$, is an eigenvalue for linear transformation, A, if and only if there exist a non-zero vector, v, such that $Av= lambda v$. Certainly, yes, the vector v= <0, 0> satisfies $Av= lambda v$. The question is whether or not there exist non-zero vectors. Here, yes, $lambda= 0$ is an eigenvalue. A vector, $begin{pmatrix}x \ y end{pmatrix}$ is an eigenvalue if and only if $begin{pmatrix}3 & -9 \ -9 & 27end{pmatrix}begin{pmatrix}x \ yend{pmatrix}= begin{pmatrix}3x- 9y \ -9x+ 27yend{pmatrix}= begin{pmatrix} 0x \ 0y end{pmatrix}= begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 0 end{pmatrix}$. So we have 3x- 9y= 0, -9x+ 27y= 0. Yes, x= y= 0 is a solution to this but the whole point of an "eigenvalue" is that there are non-zero solutions. From 3x- 9y= 0, we have 3x= 9y and then x= 3y. Replacing x by 3y in the other equation gives 3(3y)- 97= 9y- 9y= 0 so that any vector $begin{pmatrix}3y \ yend{pmatrix}$ is an eigenvector for any y.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            A number, $lambda$, is an eigenvalue for linear transformation, A, if and only if there exist a non-zero vector, v, such that $Av= lambda v$. Certainly, yes, the vector v= <0, 0> satisfies $Av= lambda v$. The question is whether or not there exist non-zero vectors. Here, yes, $lambda= 0$ is an eigenvalue. A vector, $begin{pmatrix}x \ y end{pmatrix}$ is an eigenvalue if and only if $begin{pmatrix}3 & -9 \ -9 & 27end{pmatrix}begin{pmatrix}x \ yend{pmatrix}= begin{pmatrix}3x- 9y \ -9x+ 27yend{pmatrix}= begin{pmatrix} 0x \ 0y end{pmatrix}= begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 0 end{pmatrix}$. So we have 3x- 9y= 0, -9x+ 27y= 0. Yes, x= y= 0 is a solution to this but the whole point of an "eigenvalue" is that there are non-zero solutions. From 3x- 9y= 0, we have 3x= 9y and then x= 3y. Replacing x by 3y in the other equation gives 3(3y)- 97= 9y- 9y= 0 so that any vector $begin{pmatrix}3y \ yend{pmatrix}$ is an eigenvector for any y.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            A number, $lambda$, is an eigenvalue for linear transformation, A, if and only if there exist a non-zero vector, v, such that $Av= lambda v$. Certainly, yes, the vector v= <0, 0> satisfies $Av= lambda v$. The question is whether or not there exist non-zero vectors. Here, yes, $lambda= 0$ is an eigenvalue. A vector, $begin{pmatrix}x \ y end{pmatrix}$ is an eigenvalue if and only if $begin{pmatrix}3 & -9 \ -9 & 27end{pmatrix}begin{pmatrix}x \ yend{pmatrix}= begin{pmatrix}3x- 9y \ -9x+ 27yend{pmatrix}= begin{pmatrix} 0x \ 0y end{pmatrix}= begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 0 end{pmatrix}$. So we have 3x- 9y= 0, -9x+ 27y= 0. Yes, x= y= 0 is a solution to this but the whole point of an "eigenvalue" is that there are non-zero solutions. From 3x- 9y= 0, we have 3x= 9y and then x= 3y. Replacing x by 3y in the other equation gives 3(3y)- 97= 9y- 9y= 0 so that any vector $begin{pmatrix}3y \ yend{pmatrix}$ is an eigenvector for any y.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Mar 19 at 16:35









                            user247327user247327

                            11.5k1516




                            11.5k1516






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154239%2fhow-to-find-the-unit-eigenvectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Nidaros erkebispedøme

                                Birsay

                                Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...