How many points are needed to define a circumference?Euclid / Hilbert: “Two lines parallel to a third line...

The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server

How to add power-LED to my small amplifier?

whey we use polarized capacitor?

How long does it take to type this?

Validation accuracy vs Testing accuracy

How do you conduct xenoanthropology after first contact?

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

Schwarzchild Radius of the Universe

Motorized valve interfering with button?

What Brexit solution does the DUP want?

New order #4: World

A function which translates a sentence to title-case

Can a German sentence have two subjects?

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

Japan - Plan around max visa duration

Should I join office cleaning event for free?

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?

Prevent a directory in /tmp from being deleted

Copycat chess is back

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?

Can Medicine checks be used, with decent rolls, to completely mitigate the risk of death from ongoing damage?



How many points are needed to define a circumference?


Euclid / Hilbert: “Two lines parallel to a third line are parallel to each other.”Finding number of intersections between line A and BHow many different game situations has connect four?How many 90 ball bingo cards are there?Straight lines diving the planeQuestion about an exercise from FellerCard Game: Probability, Combinatorics, - 52 suit picks,12 correct, four suit, not dependantFive points in the plane are given, no three of which are collinear. Show that some four of them form a convex quadrilateral.Given a group of 5 women and 4 men, how many different combinations of them exist where all 4 men are kept separate?System of distinct representative professors and students problem













0












$begingroup$


This doubt comes from a combinatorics problem in a textbook, which states:




Consider two strictly parallel lines and seven dots, four of which are over one of them, and three over the other. Three dots are chosen at random: what is the probability that they define a circumference?




It turns out, the solution is $1-{{4choose3}+1over{7choose3}}$. That is, all combinations in which the three chosen dots aren't collinear, divided by all combinations of three dots.



My question is: why mustn't they be collinear?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If three dots are collinear, that means they are on the same straight line. That straight line can't have more than two points in common with any given circle.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 20 at 11:45










  • $begingroup$
    isn't a line like a circle with infinite radius
    $endgroup$
    – Sik Feng Cheong
    Mar 20 at 11:46










  • $begingroup$
    @SikFengCheong There are contexts where you would consider lines to be infinite-radius circles (like when using the flat plane as a model for hyperbolic or projective geometry), but this is not one of them.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 20 at 11:49












  • $begingroup$
    The numerator in the "solution," $1-{4choose3}+1$, is negative. I think you meant $$1-{{4choose3}+1over{7choose3}}$$
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    Mar 20 at 12:42












  • $begingroup$
    Have you already seen collinear points on a circle ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 20 at 14:38
















0












$begingroup$


This doubt comes from a combinatorics problem in a textbook, which states:




Consider two strictly parallel lines and seven dots, four of which are over one of them, and three over the other. Three dots are chosen at random: what is the probability that they define a circumference?




It turns out, the solution is $1-{{4choose3}+1over{7choose3}}$. That is, all combinations in which the three chosen dots aren't collinear, divided by all combinations of three dots.



My question is: why mustn't they be collinear?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If three dots are collinear, that means they are on the same straight line. That straight line can't have more than two points in common with any given circle.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 20 at 11:45










  • $begingroup$
    isn't a line like a circle with infinite radius
    $endgroup$
    – Sik Feng Cheong
    Mar 20 at 11:46










  • $begingroup$
    @SikFengCheong There are contexts where you would consider lines to be infinite-radius circles (like when using the flat plane as a model for hyperbolic or projective geometry), but this is not one of them.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 20 at 11:49












  • $begingroup$
    The numerator in the "solution," $1-{4choose3}+1$, is negative. I think you meant $$1-{{4choose3}+1over{7choose3}}$$
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    Mar 20 at 12:42












  • $begingroup$
    Have you already seen collinear points on a circle ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 20 at 14:38














0












0








0





$begingroup$


This doubt comes from a combinatorics problem in a textbook, which states:




Consider two strictly parallel lines and seven dots, four of which are over one of them, and three over the other. Three dots are chosen at random: what is the probability that they define a circumference?




It turns out, the solution is $1-{{4choose3}+1over{7choose3}}$. That is, all combinations in which the three chosen dots aren't collinear, divided by all combinations of three dots.



My question is: why mustn't they be collinear?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




This doubt comes from a combinatorics problem in a textbook, which states:




Consider two strictly parallel lines and seven dots, four of which are over one of them, and three over the other. Three dots are chosen at random: what is the probability that they define a circumference?




It turns out, the solution is $1-{{4choose3}+1over{7choose3}}$. That is, all combinations in which the three chosen dots aren't collinear, divided by all combinations of three dots.



My question is: why mustn't they be collinear?







combinatorics geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 20 at 16:33







Daniel Oscar

















asked Mar 20 at 11:42









Daniel OscarDaniel Oscar

36211




36211








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If three dots are collinear, that means they are on the same straight line. That straight line can't have more than two points in common with any given circle.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 20 at 11:45










  • $begingroup$
    isn't a line like a circle with infinite radius
    $endgroup$
    – Sik Feng Cheong
    Mar 20 at 11:46










  • $begingroup$
    @SikFengCheong There are contexts where you would consider lines to be infinite-radius circles (like when using the flat plane as a model for hyperbolic or projective geometry), but this is not one of them.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 20 at 11:49












  • $begingroup$
    The numerator in the "solution," $1-{4choose3}+1$, is negative. I think you meant $$1-{{4choose3}+1over{7choose3}}$$
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    Mar 20 at 12:42












  • $begingroup$
    Have you already seen collinear points on a circle ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 20 at 14:38














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If three dots are collinear, that means they are on the same straight line. That straight line can't have more than two points in common with any given circle.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Mar 20 at 11:45










  • $begingroup$
    isn't a line like a circle with infinite radius
    $endgroup$
    – Sik Feng Cheong
    Mar 20 at 11:46










  • $begingroup$
    @SikFengCheong There are contexts where you would consider lines to be infinite-radius circles (like when using the flat plane as a model for hyperbolic or projective geometry), but this is not one of them.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 20 at 11:49












  • $begingroup$
    The numerator in the "solution," $1-{4choose3}+1$, is negative. I think you meant $$1-{{4choose3}+1over{7choose3}}$$
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    Mar 20 at 12:42












  • $begingroup$
    Have you already seen collinear points on a circle ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 20 at 14:38








2




2




$begingroup$
If three dots are collinear, that means they are on the same straight line. That straight line can't have more than two points in common with any given circle.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 20 at 11:45




$begingroup$
If three dots are collinear, that means they are on the same straight line. That straight line can't have more than two points in common with any given circle.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Mar 20 at 11:45












$begingroup$
isn't a line like a circle with infinite radius
$endgroup$
– Sik Feng Cheong
Mar 20 at 11:46




$begingroup$
isn't a line like a circle with infinite radius
$endgroup$
– Sik Feng Cheong
Mar 20 at 11:46












$begingroup$
@SikFengCheong There are contexts where you would consider lines to be infinite-radius circles (like when using the flat plane as a model for hyperbolic or projective geometry), but this is not one of them.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 20 at 11:49






$begingroup$
@SikFengCheong There are contexts where you would consider lines to be infinite-radius circles (like when using the flat plane as a model for hyperbolic or projective geometry), but this is not one of them.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 20 at 11:49














$begingroup$
The numerator in the "solution," $1-{4choose3}+1$, is negative. I think you meant $$1-{{4choose3}+1over{7choose3}}$$
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
Mar 20 at 12:42






$begingroup$
The numerator in the "solution," $1-{4choose3}+1$, is negative. I think you meant $$1-{{4choose3}+1over{7choose3}}$$
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
Mar 20 at 12:42














$begingroup$
Have you already seen collinear points on a circle ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Mar 20 at 14:38




$begingroup$
Have you already seen collinear points on a circle ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Mar 20 at 14:38










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

If three collinear points $ABC$ belong to a circle, then there exists a point $O$ such that $$AO=BO=CO.$$



Let's show this is not possible. From the above equality it follows that $OAB$ and $OAC$ are two isosceles triangles, hence
$$
angle OAB=angle OBA =angle OCB.
$$

But then, in triangle $OBC$ we have an external angle $angle OBA$ equal to internal angle $angle OCB$, and that is impossible by Euclid's exterior angle theorem, QED.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3155335%2fhow-many-points-are-needed-to-define-a-circumference%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    If three collinear points $ABC$ belong to a circle, then there exists a point $O$ such that $$AO=BO=CO.$$



    Let's show this is not possible. From the above equality it follows that $OAB$ and $OAC$ are two isosceles triangles, hence
    $$
    angle OAB=angle OBA =angle OCB.
    $$

    But then, in triangle $OBC$ we have an external angle $angle OBA$ equal to internal angle $angle OCB$, and that is impossible by Euclid's exterior angle theorem, QED.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      If three collinear points $ABC$ belong to a circle, then there exists a point $O$ such that $$AO=BO=CO.$$



      Let's show this is not possible. From the above equality it follows that $OAB$ and $OAC$ are two isosceles triangles, hence
      $$
      angle OAB=angle OBA =angle OCB.
      $$

      But then, in triangle $OBC$ we have an external angle $angle OBA$ equal to internal angle $angle OCB$, and that is impossible by Euclid's exterior angle theorem, QED.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        If three collinear points $ABC$ belong to a circle, then there exists a point $O$ such that $$AO=BO=CO.$$



        Let's show this is not possible. From the above equality it follows that $OAB$ and $OAC$ are two isosceles triangles, hence
        $$
        angle OAB=angle OBA =angle OCB.
        $$

        But then, in triangle $OBC$ we have an external angle $angle OBA$ equal to internal angle $angle OCB$, and that is impossible by Euclid's exterior angle theorem, QED.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        If three collinear points $ABC$ belong to a circle, then there exists a point $O$ such that $$AO=BO=CO.$$



        Let's show this is not possible. From the above equality it follows that $OAB$ and $OAC$ are two isosceles triangles, hence
        $$
        angle OAB=angle OBA =angle OCB.
        $$

        But then, in triangle $OBC$ we have an external angle $angle OBA$ equal to internal angle $angle OCB$, and that is impossible by Euclid's exterior angle theorem, QED.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 20 at 14:35









        AretinoAretino

        25.8k31545




        25.8k31545






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3155335%2fhow-many-points-are-needed-to-define-a-circumference%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            六本木駅

            Integral that is continuous and looks like it converges to a geometric seriesTesting if a geometric series converges by taking limit to infinitySummation of arithmetic-geometric series of higher orderGeometric series with polynomial exponentHow to Recognize a Geometric SeriesShowing an integral equality with series over the integersDiscontinuity of a series of continuous functionsReasons why a Series ConvergesSum of infinite geometric series with two terms in summationUsing geometric series for computing IntegralsLimit of geometric series sum when $r = 1$

            Joseph Lister