understanding of vector and pointQuestion in Do Carmo 1-2Simple question regarding orthogonalityQuestion on...

Assassin's bullet with mercury

In 'Revenger,' what does 'cove' come from?

Is it possible to create a QR code using text?

How to prevent "they're falling in love" trope

Why would the Red Woman birth a shadow if she worshipped the Lord of the Light?

How do I deal with an unproductive colleague in a small company?

Apex Framework / library for consuming REST services

Im going to France and my passport expires June 19th

Unable to supress ligatures in headings which are set in Caps

How writing a dominant 7 sus4 chord in RNA ( Vsus7 chord in the 1st inversion)

Detention in 1997

Is it logically or scientifically possible to artificially send energy to the body?

Expand and Contract

What is the most common color to indicate the input-field is disabled?

How can I deal with my CEO asking me to hire someone with a higher salary than me, a co-founder?

How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?

Should I cover my bicycle overnight while bikepacking?

Can my sorcerer use a spellbook only to collect spells and scribe scrolls, not cast?

What's the in-universe reasoning behind sorcerers needing material components?

How do conventional missiles fly?

Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?

What do you call someone who asks many questions?

Can a human being not be part of human beings' species?

Is "remove commented out code" correct English?



understanding of vector and point


Question in Do Carmo 1-2Simple question regarding orthogonalityQuestion on Do CarmoClosest point of parameterized curve has orthogonal position vector to tangentDo we substitute the point in question in direction vector for parametric equation of 3d vectors?A question about parametrized differentiable curves.Problem understanding the indicatrix tangent definitionDifferential map of velocity vectorAbout the definition of curvatureStrong/weak tangents and limit positions, with rigor













0












$begingroup$


I just have some confusions about basic understandings in vectors and points. For example, if $$alpha(t)=(x(t),y(t),z(t))$$ is a parametrized curve from $I$ to $mathbb{R^3}$, then for a specific point $t_0 in I$ , $alpha(t_0)$ represents a vector or a point in $mathbb{R^3}$ ? Why? I think $alpha(t_0)$ is a point on $mathbb{R^3}$, but I saw $alpha(t_0)$ described as a position vector in Do Carmo's book.
Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I just have some confusions about basic understandings in vectors and points. For example, if $$alpha(t)=(x(t),y(t),z(t))$$ is a parametrized curve from $I$ to $mathbb{R^3}$, then for a specific point $t_0 in I$ , $alpha(t_0)$ represents a vector or a point in $mathbb{R^3}$ ? Why? I think $alpha(t_0)$ is a point on $mathbb{R^3}$, but I saw $alpha(t_0)$ described as a position vector in Do Carmo's book.
    Thank you!










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I just have some confusions about basic understandings in vectors and points. For example, if $$alpha(t)=(x(t),y(t),z(t))$$ is a parametrized curve from $I$ to $mathbb{R^3}$, then for a specific point $t_0 in I$ , $alpha(t_0)$ represents a vector or a point in $mathbb{R^3}$ ? Why? I think $alpha(t_0)$ is a point on $mathbb{R^3}$, but I saw $alpha(t_0)$ described as a position vector in Do Carmo's book.
      Thank you!










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I just have some confusions about basic understandings in vectors and points. For example, if $$alpha(t)=(x(t),y(t),z(t))$$ is a parametrized curve from $I$ to $mathbb{R^3}$, then for a specific point $t_0 in I$ , $alpha(t_0)$ represents a vector or a point in $mathbb{R^3}$ ? Why? I think $alpha(t_0)$ is a point on $mathbb{R^3}$, but I saw $alpha(t_0)$ described as a position vector in Do Carmo's book.
      Thank you!







      calculus differential-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 18 at 19:32









      jf1997jf1997

      102




      102






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Assuming you are given a coordinate system in $R^3$, there exist a "one to one correspondence" between the set of all points in $R^3$ and the set of three dimensional vectors. So we can interpret the $alpha(t)= (x(t), y(t), z(t))$, for each t, to be either a point or the vector that, if we were to have its base at (0, 0, 0) would have its tip at the point (x(t), y(t), z(t)).



          I am not saying that points and vector are the same thing! For example, given the vector (x, y, z), which would represent the vector with end at (0, 0, 0) and tip at the point (x, y, z), we can [b]move[/b] that vector so that its end is at (a, b, c) and its tip is at (a+ x, b+ y, c+ z) but it is the same vector. You can move vectors but you can't move points.



          (Some texts use for vectors specifically to distinguish vectors from points (x, y, z).)






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            The idea is that some things are essentially the same in mathematics -- isomorphic is the term of art.



            This is also the case with vectors and points in Euclidean space. In particular, if we always take the position vector (i.e., those originating at the origin of coordinates) as the representative of each equivalence class of vectors, then there is an isomorphism between the points and vectors of that space, so that we may regard them as essentially the same thing.



            How we think of them in a particular case would depend on which is more convenient for the problem at hand.



            By the way, note that there is a difference between a curve and its trace.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$














              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3153206%2funderstanding-of-vector-and-point%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              0












              $begingroup$

              Assuming you are given a coordinate system in $R^3$, there exist a "one to one correspondence" between the set of all points in $R^3$ and the set of three dimensional vectors. So we can interpret the $alpha(t)= (x(t), y(t), z(t))$, for each t, to be either a point or the vector that, if we were to have its base at (0, 0, 0) would have its tip at the point (x(t), y(t), z(t)).



              I am not saying that points and vector are the same thing! For example, given the vector (x, y, z), which would represent the vector with end at (0, 0, 0) and tip at the point (x, y, z), we can [b]move[/b] that vector so that its end is at (a, b, c) and its tip is at (a+ x, b+ y, c+ z) but it is the same vector. You can move vectors but you can't move points.



              (Some texts use for vectors specifically to distinguish vectors from points (x, y, z).)






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                Assuming you are given a coordinate system in $R^3$, there exist a "one to one correspondence" between the set of all points in $R^3$ and the set of three dimensional vectors. So we can interpret the $alpha(t)= (x(t), y(t), z(t))$, for each t, to be either a point or the vector that, if we were to have its base at (0, 0, 0) would have its tip at the point (x(t), y(t), z(t)).



                I am not saying that points and vector are the same thing! For example, given the vector (x, y, z), which would represent the vector with end at (0, 0, 0) and tip at the point (x, y, z), we can [b]move[/b] that vector so that its end is at (a, b, c) and its tip is at (a+ x, b+ y, c+ z) but it is the same vector. You can move vectors but you can't move points.



                (Some texts use for vectors specifically to distinguish vectors from points (x, y, z).)






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Assuming you are given a coordinate system in $R^3$, there exist a "one to one correspondence" between the set of all points in $R^3$ and the set of three dimensional vectors. So we can interpret the $alpha(t)= (x(t), y(t), z(t))$, for each t, to be either a point or the vector that, if we were to have its base at (0, 0, 0) would have its tip at the point (x(t), y(t), z(t)).



                  I am not saying that points and vector are the same thing! For example, given the vector (x, y, z), which would represent the vector with end at (0, 0, 0) and tip at the point (x, y, z), we can [b]move[/b] that vector so that its end is at (a, b, c) and its tip is at (a+ x, b+ y, c+ z) but it is the same vector. You can move vectors but you can't move points.



                  (Some texts use for vectors specifically to distinguish vectors from points (x, y, z).)






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Assuming you are given a coordinate system in $R^3$, there exist a "one to one correspondence" between the set of all points in $R^3$ and the set of three dimensional vectors. So we can interpret the $alpha(t)= (x(t), y(t), z(t))$, for each t, to be either a point or the vector that, if we were to have its base at (0, 0, 0) would have its tip at the point (x(t), y(t), z(t)).



                  I am not saying that points and vector are the same thing! For example, given the vector (x, y, z), which would represent the vector with end at (0, 0, 0) and tip at the point (x, y, z), we can [b]move[/b] that vector so that its end is at (a, b, c) and its tip is at (a+ x, b+ y, c+ z) but it is the same vector. You can move vectors but you can't move points.



                  (Some texts use for vectors specifically to distinguish vectors from points (x, y, z).)







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 18 at 19:51









                  user247327user247327

                  11.6k1516




                  11.6k1516























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      The idea is that some things are essentially the same in mathematics -- isomorphic is the term of art.



                      This is also the case with vectors and points in Euclidean space. In particular, if we always take the position vector (i.e., those originating at the origin of coordinates) as the representative of each equivalence class of vectors, then there is an isomorphism between the points and vectors of that space, so that we may regard them as essentially the same thing.



                      How we think of them in a particular case would depend on which is more convenient for the problem at hand.



                      By the way, note that there is a difference between a curve and its trace.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        The idea is that some things are essentially the same in mathematics -- isomorphic is the term of art.



                        This is also the case with vectors and points in Euclidean space. In particular, if we always take the position vector (i.e., those originating at the origin of coordinates) as the representative of each equivalence class of vectors, then there is an isomorphism between the points and vectors of that space, so that we may regard them as essentially the same thing.



                        How we think of them in a particular case would depend on which is more convenient for the problem at hand.



                        By the way, note that there is a difference between a curve and its trace.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          The idea is that some things are essentially the same in mathematics -- isomorphic is the term of art.



                          This is also the case with vectors and points in Euclidean space. In particular, if we always take the position vector (i.e., those originating at the origin of coordinates) as the representative of each equivalence class of vectors, then there is an isomorphism between the points and vectors of that space, so that we may regard them as essentially the same thing.



                          How we think of them in a particular case would depend on which is more convenient for the problem at hand.



                          By the way, note that there is a difference between a curve and its trace.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          The idea is that some things are essentially the same in mathematics -- isomorphic is the term of art.



                          This is also the case with vectors and points in Euclidean space. In particular, if we always take the position vector (i.e., those originating at the origin of coordinates) as the representative of each equivalence class of vectors, then there is an isomorphism between the points and vectors of that space, so that we may regard them as essentially the same thing.



                          How we think of them in a particular case would depend on which is more convenient for the problem at hand.



                          By the way, note that there is a difference between a curve and its trace.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Mar 18 at 20:11









                          AllawonderAllawonder

                          2,263616




                          2,263616






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3153206%2funderstanding-of-vector-and-point%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              六本木駅

                              Integral that is continuous and looks like it converges to a geometric seriesTesting if a geometric series converges by taking limit to infinitySummation of arithmetic-geometric series of higher orderGeometric series with polynomial exponentHow to Recognize a Geometric SeriesShowing an integral equality with series over the integersDiscontinuity of a series of continuous functionsReasons why a Series ConvergesSum of infinite geometric series with two terms in summationUsing geometric series for computing IntegralsLimit of geometric series sum when $r = 1$

                              Joseph Lister