Delta in Epsilon delta definition of limit [closed] The Next CEO of Stack OverflowLimits using...

Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?

What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"

Skipping indices in a product

Would a galaxy be visible from outside, but nearby?

How do I transpose the 1st and -1th levels of an arbitrarily nested array?

Multiple labels for a single equation

How does the mv command work with external drives?

How do we know the LHC results are robust?

Received an invoice from my ex-employer billing me for training; how to handle?

Do I need to enable Dev Hub in my PROD Org?

How do I avoid eval and parse?

Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?

What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?

Interfacing a button to MCU (and PC) with 50m long cable

How fast would a person need to move to trick the eye?

Why don't programming languages automatically manage the synchronous/asynchronous problem?

Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?

Is it possible to search for a directory/file combination?

What connection does MS Office have to Netscape Navigator?

Can you replace a racial trait cantrip when leveling up?

Is micro rebar a better way to reinforce concrete than rebar?

Which tube will fit a -(700 x 25c) wheel?

MessageLevel in QGIS3

Return the Closest Prime Number



Delta in Epsilon delta definition of limit [closed]



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowLimits using epsilon delta definition $f(x,y)=xy$ for functions of two variables$epsilon - delta$ definition of a limitProving a limit using epsilon delta definitionInterpretation of $epsilon$-$delta$ limit definitiondoes epsilon-delta definition of limit presuppose that the function is defined everywhere at (x-delta,x+delta)?Question about limits using delta - epsilon definition$epsilon-delta$ definition for limits involving $infty$($epsilon$,$delta$) Definition of limit$epsilon−delta$ limit proofLimit with Epsilon - Delta method












0












$begingroup$


We know delta in epsilon delta definition of limit depends upon epsilon.
Can delta in epsilon delta definition of limits depend upon x also?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as unclear what you're asking by Thomas Shelby, Alex Provost, Cesareo, mrtaurho, José Carlos Santos Mar 17 at 13:29


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















  • $begingroup$
    The value of $delta$ depends on the value of $x$ and $epsilon.$
    $endgroup$
    – mfl
    Mar 16 at 17:19










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it depends on $x$ in general.
    $endgroup$
    – GReyes
    Mar 16 at 17:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    When it does not depend on $x$, it leads to the notion of uniform continuity, convergence, &c.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Mar 16 at 17:21










  • $begingroup$
    When it does not depend on $x$, we say that the convergence is uniform. This is an important property. [Crossed with Bernard]
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 16 at 17:21


















0












$begingroup$


We know delta in epsilon delta definition of limit depends upon epsilon.
Can delta in epsilon delta definition of limits depend upon x also?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as unclear what you're asking by Thomas Shelby, Alex Provost, Cesareo, mrtaurho, José Carlos Santos Mar 17 at 13:29


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















  • $begingroup$
    The value of $delta$ depends on the value of $x$ and $epsilon.$
    $endgroup$
    – mfl
    Mar 16 at 17:19










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it depends on $x$ in general.
    $endgroup$
    – GReyes
    Mar 16 at 17:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    When it does not depend on $x$, it leads to the notion of uniform continuity, convergence, &c.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Mar 16 at 17:21










  • $begingroup$
    When it does not depend on $x$, we say that the convergence is uniform. This is an important property. [Crossed with Bernard]
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 16 at 17:21
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


We know delta in epsilon delta definition of limit depends upon epsilon.
Can delta in epsilon delta definition of limits depend upon x also?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




We know delta in epsilon delta definition of limit depends upon epsilon.
Can delta in epsilon delta definition of limits depend upon x also?







limits






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 16 at 17:16









Sukh JotSukh Jot

11




11




closed as unclear what you're asking by Thomas Shelby, Alex Provost, Cesareo, mrtaurho, José Carlos Santos Mar 17 at 13:29


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









closed as unclear what you're asking by Thomas Shelby, Alex Provost, Cesareo, mrtaurho, José Carlos Santos Mar 17 at 13:29


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • $begingroup$
    The value of $delta$ depends on the value of $x$ and $epsilon.$
    $endgroup$
    – mfl
    Mar 16 at 17:19










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it depends on $x$ in general.
    $endgroup$
    – GReyes
    Mar 16 at 17:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    When it does not depend on $x$, it leads to the notion of uniform continuity, convergence, &c.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Mar 16 at 17:21










  • $begingroup$
    When it does not depend on $x$, we say that the convergence is uniform. This is an important property. [Crossed with Bernard]
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 16 at 17:21




















  • $begingroup$
    The value of $delta$ depends on the value of $x$ and $epsilon.$
    $endgroup$
    – mfl
    Mar 16 at 17:19










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it depends on $x$ in general.
    $endgroup$
    – GReyes
    Mar 16 at 17:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    When it does not depend on $x$, it leads to the notion of uniform continuity, convergence, &c.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard
    Mar 16 at 17:21










  • $begingroup$
    When it does not depend on $x$, we say that the convergence is uniform. This is an important property. [Crossed with Bernard]
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 16 at 17:21


















$begingroup$
The value of $delta$ depends on the value of $x$ and $epsilon.$
$endgroup$
– mfl
Mar 16 at 17:19




$begingroup$
The value of $delta$ depends on the value of $x$ and $epsilon.$
$endgroup$
– mfl
Mar 16 at 17:19












$begingroup$
Yes, it depends on $x$ in general.
$endgroup$
– GReyes
Mar 16 at 17:19




$begingroup$
Yes, it depends on $x$ in general.
$endgroup$
– GReyes
Mar 16 at 17:19




1




1




$begingroup$
When it does not depend on $x$, it leads to the notion of uniform continuity, convergence, &c.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Mar 16 at 17:21




$begingroup$
When it does not depend on $x$, it leads to the notion of uniform continuity, convergence, &c.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Mar 16 at 17:21












$begingroup$
When it does not depend on $x$, we say that the convergence is uniform. This is an important property. [Crossed with Bernard]
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Mar 16 at 17:21






$begingroup$
When it does not depend on $x$, we say that the convergence is uniform. This is an important property. [Crossed with Bernard]
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Mar 16 at 17:21












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Yes, and it often does!



For example, let's say that $f$ is a real-valued function on some subset $E$ of the real line. We say that $f$ is continuous if for every $epsilon>0$ and every $xin E,$ there is some $delta>0$ such that, whenever $yin E$ and $|x-y|<delta,$ we have $bigl|f(x)-f(y)bigr|<epsilon.$ This $delta,$ though, may be different for different $x,$ even when $epsilon$ is the same. For instance, consider $f(x)=frac1x$ and $E={xinBbb R:xne 0}.$ We can show that $f$ is continuous, but we'll need to choose smaller $delta$-values as $x$ gets closer to $0,$ since $f$ is changing so rapidly there.



Now, we say that $f$ is uniformly continuous if for every $epsilon>0,$ there is some $delta>0$ such that, whenever $x,yin E$ and $|x-y|<delta,$ we have $bigl|f(x)-f(y)bigr|<epsilon.$ In this case, the $delta$ does not depend on $x.$ Bringing it back to the function $f(x)=frac1x,$ but with $E=[1,infty),$ instead, it turns out that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $E$! Since $f$ changes less and less quickly the farther $x$ gets from $0,$ all we need to do is find a $delta$ that works when $x=1,$ and it will work for all other $xin E,$ as well!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    Yes, and it often does!



    For example, let's say that $f$ is a real-valued function on some subset $E$ of the real line. We say that $f$ is continuous if for every $epsilon>0$ and every $xin E,$ there is some $delta>0$ such that, whenever $yin E$ and $|x-y|<delta,$ we have $bigl|f(x)-f(y)bigr|<epsilon.$ This $delta,$ though, may be different for different $x,$ even when $epsilon$ is the same. For instance, consider $f(x)=frac1x$ and $E={xinBbb R:xne 0}.$ We can show that $f$ is continuous, but we'll need to choose smaller $delta$-values as $x$ gets closer to $0,$ since $f$ is changing so rapidly there.



    Now, we say that $f$ is uniformly continuous if for every $epsilon>0,$ there is some $delta>0$ such that, whenever $x,yin E$ and $|x-y|<delta,$ we have $bigl|f(x)-f(y)bigr|<epsilon.$ In this case, the $delta$ does not depend on $x.$ Bringing it back to the function $f(x)=frac1x,$ but with $E=[1,infty),$ instead, it turns out that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $E$! Since $f$ changes less and less quickly the farther $x$ gets from $0,$ all we need to do is find a $delta$ that works when $x=1,$ and it will work for all other $xin E,$ as well!






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      Yes, and it often does!



      For example, let's say that $f$ is a real-valued function on some subset $E$ of the real line. We say that $f$ is continuous if for every $epsilon>0$ and every $xin E,$ there is some $delta>0$ such that, whenever $yin E$ and $|x-y|<delta,$ we have $bigl|f(x)-f(y)bigr|<epsilon.$ This $delta,$ though, may be different for different $x,$ even when $epsilon$ is the same. For instance, consider $f(x)=frac1x$ and $E={xinBbb R:xne 0}.$ We can show that $f$ is continuous, but we'll need to choose smaller $delta$-values as $x$ gets closer to $0,$ since $f$ is changing so rapidly there.



      Now, we say that $f$ is uniformly continuous if for every $epsilon>0,$ there is some $delta>0$ such that, whenever $x,yin E$ and $|x-y|<delta,$ we have $bigl|f(x)-f(y)bigr|<epsilon.$ In this case, the $delta$ does not depend on $x.$ Bringing it back to the function $f(x)=frac1x,$ but with $E=[1,infty),$ instead, it turns out that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $E$! Since $f$ changes less and less quickly the farther $x$ gets from $0,$ all we need to do is find a $delta$ that works when $x=1,$ and it will work for all other $xin E,$ as well!






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Yes, and it often does!



        For example, let's say that $f$ is a real-valued function on some subset $E$ of the real line. We say that $f$ is continuous if for every $epsilon>0$ and every $xin E,$ there is some $delta>0$ such that, whenever $yin E$ and $|x-y|<delta,$ we have $bigl|f(x)-f(y)bigr|<epsilon.$ This $delta,$ though, may be different for different $x,$ even when $epsilon$ is the same. For instance, consider $f(x)=frac1x$ and $E={xinBbb R:xne 0}.$ We can show that $f$ is continuous, but we'll need to choose smaller $delta$-values as $x$ gets closer to $0,$ since $f$ is changing so rapidly there.



        Now, we say that $f$ is uniformly continuous if for every $epsilon>0,$ there is some $delta>0$ such that, whenever $x,yin E$ and $|x-y|<delta,$ we have $bigl|f(x)-f(y)bigr|<epsilon.$ In this case, the $delta$ does not depend on $x.$ Bringing it back to the function $f(x)=frac1x,$ but with $E=[1,infty),$ instead, it turns out that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $E$! Since $f$ changes less and less quickly the farther $x$ gets from $0,$ all we need to do is find a $delta$ that works when $x=1,$ and it will work for all other $xin E,$ as well!






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Yes, and it often does!



        For example, let's say that $f$ is a real-valued function on some subset $E$ of the real line. We say that $f$ is continuous if for every $epsilon>0$ and every $xin E,$ there is some $delta>0$ such that, whenever $yin E$ and $|x-y|<delta,$ we have $bigl|f(x)-f(y)bigr|<epsilon.$ This $delta,$ though, may be different for different $x,$ even when $epsilon$ is the same. For instance, consider $f(x)=frac1x$ and $E={xinBbb R:xne 0}.$ We can show that $f$ is continuous, but we'll need to choose smaller $delta$-values as $x$ gets closer to $0,$ since $f$ is changing so rapidly there.



        Now, we say that $f$ is uniformly continuous if for every $epsilon>0,$ there is some $delta>0$ such that, whenever $x,yin E$ and $|x-y|<delta,$ we have $bigl|f(x)-f(y)bigr|<epsilon.$ In this case, the $delta$ does not depend on $x.$ Bringing it back to the function $f(x)=frac1x,$ but with $E=[1,infty),$ instead, it turns out that $f$ is uniformly continuous on $E$! Since $f$ changes less and less quickly the farther $x$ gets from $0,$ all we need to do is find a $delta$ that works when $x=1,$ and it will work for all other $xin E,$ as well!







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Mar 16 at 18:01

























        answered Mar 16 at 17:24









        Cameron BuieCameron Buie

        86.3k773161




        86.3k773161















            Popular posts from this blog

            六本木駅

            Integral that is continuous and looks like it converges to a geometric seriesTesting if a geometric series converges by taking limit to infinitySummation of arithmetic-geometric series of higher orderGeometric series with polynomial exponentHow to Recognize a Geometric SeriesShowing an integral equality with series over the integersDiscontinuity of a series of continuous functionsReasons why a Series ConvergesSum of infinite geometric series with two terms in summationUsing geometric series for computing IntegralsLimit of geometric series sum when $r = 1$

            Joseph Lister