$f : Bbb{C} to Bbb{C}$ is an entire function s.t. $|f(z)| to infty$ as $|z| to infty$. Prove $f$ is a...
Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?
RequirePermission not working
Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?
Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?
Does HR tell a hiring manager about salary negotiations?
Why does the nucleus not repel itself?
Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?
Old scifi movie from the 50s or 60s with men in solid red uniforms who interrogate a spy from the past
If climate change impact can be observed in nature, has that had any effect on rural, i.e. farming community, perception of the scientific consensus?
Loose spokes after only a few rides
For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?
Is it safe to harvest rainwater that fell on solar panels?
Kerning for subscripts of sigma?
Is bread bad for ducks?
What is the most efficient way to store a numeric range?
Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation
Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?
Geography at the pixel level
Getting crown tickets for Statue of Liberty
Falsification in Math vs Science
What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic Wars mean?
Is there a way to generate a uniformly distributed point on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers?
Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?
Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?
$f : Bbb{C} to Bbb{C}$ is an entire function s.t. $|f(z)| to infty$ as $|z| to infty$. Prove $f$ is a polynomial.
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InIf $F$ is entire with removable singularity at $infty$, then $F$ is constant?bounded real part then removable singularityAt $z=0$ the function $f(z)=exp({zover 1-cos z})$ hasMust an entire function be bounded in any open disk around the origin?Extending an analytic function to an entire functionNot understanding how to use the following information: $f$ is entire, and $lim _{|z| rightarrow infty} frac{f(z)}{z^2}=2i$Prove that $fequiv 0$ where $f$ is entireFind all entire function $f$ such that $lim_{zto infty}left|frac{f(z)}{z}right|=0$problem on existence of entire functionShouldn't a entire function be strictly a polynomial?
$begingroup$
Let $f : mathbb{C} rightarrow mathbb{C}$ be an entire function such that $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$. Prove that $f$ is a polynomial by following the steps below.
(a) Observe that the function $f(1/z)$ defined in $C setminus{0}$ has a pole at the origin. Let $S$ be the
singular part of its Laurent series around $0$. Argue that $g(z) = f(z) − S(1/z)$ approaches
finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$.
(b) Prove that $g$ extends to a bounded entire function and is therefore constant.
(c) Deduce that $f$ is a polynomial.
I know there are solutions to this but not with these steps. I have been given this as an assignment and really need help to figure out how to write the solution.
For point (a) I wrote
In order for $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$, is equavalent saying $|f(frac{1}{z})| rightarrow infty$ as $z rightarrow 0$. So $f(z)$ can be written in Laurent series around the point $0$ such that $sum_{n=-infty}^infty a_nz^n = g(z) + s(frac{1}{z})$ given $g(z)$ is the power series $sum_{n=0}^infty a_nz^n$ and $S$ is the singular part of its Laurent series around $0$.
Hence,
$ g(z)= f(z) - s(frac{1}{z})$ and $g(z)$ tends to a
finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$ given the power series.
For (b) I wrote
Only removable singularities are left in $g(z)$. So
with Riemann's removable singularity theorem, with $p$ being some removable singularity. $g(z)$ can be extended continuously and holomorphically at $p$ and since $g(z)$ is bonded on some disc around $p$ excluding the point $p$ with a radius bigger than $0$. Hence the extended function is bounded as well and by Liouville's theorem, it is a constant function.
And I have no clue how to answer (c), sorry for the long post and thanks in advance!!!
complex-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f : mathbb{C} rightarrow mathbb{C}$ be an entire function such that $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$. Prove that $f$ is a polynomial by following the steps below.
(a) Observe that the function $f(1/z)$ defined in $C setminus{0}$ has a pole at the origin. Let $S$ be the
singular part of its Laurent series around $0$. Argue that $g(z) = f(z) − S(1/z)$ approaches
finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$.
(b) Prove that $g$ extends to a bounded entire function and is therefore constant.
(c) Deduce that $f$ is a polynomial.
I know there are solutions to this but not with these steps. I have been given this as an assignment and really need help to figure out how to write the solution.
For point (a) I wrote
In order for $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$, is equavalent saying $|f(frac{1}{z})| rightarrow infty$ as $z rightarrow 0$. So $f(z)$ can be written in Laurent series around the point $0$ such that $sum_{n=-infty}^infty a_nz^n = g(z) + s(frac{1}{z})$ given $g(z)$ is the power series $sum_{n=0}^infty a_nz^n$ and $S$ is the singular part of its Laurent series around $0$.
Hence,
$ g(z)= f(z) - s(frac{1}{z})$ and $g(z)$ tends to a
finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$ given the power series.
For (b) I wrote
Only removable singularities are left in $g(z)$. So
with Riemann's removable singularity theorem, with $p$ being some removable singularity. $g(z)$ can be extended continuously and holomorphically at $p$ and since $g(z)$ is bonded on some disc around $p$ excluding the point $p$ with a radius bigger than $0$. Hence the extended function is bounded as well and by Liouville's theorem, it is a constant function.
And I have no clue how to answer (c), sorry for the long post and thanks in advance!!!
complex-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f : mathbb{C} rightarrow mathbb{C}$ be an entire function such that $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$. Prove that $f$ is a polynomial by following the steps below.
(a) Observe that the function $f(1/z)$ defined in $C setminus{0}$ has a pole at the origin. Let $S$ be the
singular part of its Laurent series around $0$. Argue that $g(z) = f(z) − S(1/z)$ approaches
finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$.
(b) Prove that $g$ extends to a bounded entire function and is therefore constant.
(c) Deduce that $f$ is a polynomial.
I know there are solutions to this but not with these steps. I have been given this as an assignment and really need help to figure out how to write the solution.
For point (a) I wrote
In order for $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$, is equavalent saying $|f(frac{1}{z})| rightarrow infty$ as $z rightarrow 0$. So $f(z)$ can be written in Laurent series around the point $0$ such that $sum_{n=-infty}^infty a_nz^n = g(z) + s(frac{1}{z})$ given $g(z)$ is the power series $sum_{n=0}^infty a_nz^n$ and $S$ is the singular part of its Laurent series around $0$.
Hence,
$ g(z)= f(z) - s(frac{1}{z})$ and $g(z)$ tends to a
finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$ given the power series.
For (b) I wrote
Only removable singularities are left in $g(z)$. So
with Riemann's removable singularity theorem, with $p$ being some removable singularity. $g(z)$ can be extended continuously and holomorphically at $p$ and since $g(z)$ is bonded on some disc around $p$ excluding the point $p$ with a radius bigger than $0$. Hence the extended function is bounded as well and by Liouville's theorem, it is a constant function.
And I have no clue how to answer (c), sorry for the long post and thanks in advance!!!
complex-analysis
$endgroup$
Let $f : mathbb{C} rightarrow mathbb{C}$ be an entire function such that $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$. Prove that $f$ is a polynomial by following the steps below.
(a) Observe that the function $f(1/z)$ defined in $C setminus{0}$ has a pole at the origin. Let $S$ be the
singular part of its Laurent series around $0$. Argue that $g(z) = f(z) − S(1/z)$ approaches
finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$.
(b) Prove that $g$ extends to a bounded entire function and is therefore constant.
(c) Deduce that $f$ is a polynomial.
I know there are solutions to this but not with these steps. I have been given this as an assignment and really need help to figure out how to write the solution.
For point (a) I wrote
In order for $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$, is equavalent saying $|f(frac{1}{z})| rightarrow infty$ as $z rightarrow 0$. So $f(z)$ can be written in Laurent series around the point $0$ such that $sum_{n=-infty}^infty a_nz^n = g(z) + s(frac{1}{z})$ given $g(z)$ is the power series $sum_{n=0}^infty a_nz^n$ and $S$ is the singular part of its Laurent series around $0$.
Hence,
$ g(z)= f(z) - s(frac{1}{z})$ and $g(z)$ tends to a
finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$ given the power series.
For (b) I wrote
Only removable singularities are left in $g(z)$. So
with Riemann's removable singularity theorem, with $p$ being some removable singularity. $g(z)$ can be extended continuously and holomorphically at $p$ and since $g(z)$ is bonded on some disc around $p$ excluding the point $p$ with a radius bigger than $0$. Hence the extended function is bounded as well and by Liouville's theorem, it is a constant function.
And I have no clue how to answer (c), sorry for the long post and thanks in advance!!!
complex-analysis
complex-analysis
edited Mar 22 at 2:45
Andrews
1,2812423
1,2812423
asked Mar 22 at 0:37
ChengCheng
233
233
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In your solution to part (a), notice that the Laurent series you have written down is for $f(frac 1z)$, so the correct formula is $f(frac 1z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n z^n +S(z)$. So by the change of coordinates $zmapsto frac 1z$, we get $f(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_nfrac 1{z^n} +S(frac 1z)$. So the $g(z)$ in the question is actually $sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$. As $|z|toinfty$, this series indeed tends to $a_0$, which is finite. As for $zto 0$. Now by looking that the Laurent series again, we see that $S(frac 1z)$ has removable singularity at $z=0$. So $g(z)=f(z)-S(frac 1z)$ also has removable singularity at $z=0$, in other words the limit as $zto 0$ exists.
For part (b), holomorphicity of $g(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$ follows directly from $g$ having removable singularity at $0$. By comparing the power series and Laurent series, we see that the only term appearing in the series must be the constant $a_0$ only.
For part (c), the hint is to look at the Laurent expansion of $f(frac 1z)$ again, and recover the series for $f(z)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157589%2ff-bbbc-to-bbbc-is-an-entire-function-s-t-fz-to-infty-as-z%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
In your solution to part (a), notice that the Laurent series you have written down is for $f(frac 1z)$, so the correct formula is $f(frac 1z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n z^n +S(z)$. So by the change of coordinates $zmapsto frac 1z$, we get $f(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_nfrac 1{z^n} +S(frac 1z)$. So the $g(z)$ in the question is actually $sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$. As $|z|toinfty$, this series indeed tends to $a_0$, which is finite. As for $zto 0$. Now by looking that the Laurent series again, we see that $S(frac 1z)$ has removable singularity at $z=0$. So $g(z)=f(z)-S(frac 1z)$ also has removable singularity at $z=0$, in other words the limit as $zto 0$ exists.
For part (b), holomorphicity of $g(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$ follows directly from $g$ having removable singularity at $0$. By comparing the power series and Laurent series, we see that the only term appearing in the series must be the constant $a_0$ only.
For part (c), the hint is to look at the Laurent expansion of $f(frac 1z)$ again, and recover the series for $f(z)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In your solution to part (a), notice that the Laurent series you have written down is for $f(frac 1z)$, so the correct formula is $f(frac 1z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n z^n +S(z)$. So by the change of coordinates $zmapsto frac 1z$, we get $f(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_nfrac 1{z^n} +S(frac 1z)$. So the $g(z)$ in the question is actually $sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$. As $|z|toinfty$, this series indeed tends to $a_0$, which is finite. As for $zto 0$. Now by looking that the Laurent series again, we see that $S(frac 1z)$ has removable singularity at $z=0$. So $g(z)=f(z)-S(frac 1z)$ also has removable singularity at $z=0$, in other words the limit as $zto 0$ exists.
For part (b), holomorphicity of $g(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$ follows directly from $g$ having removable singularity at $0$. By comparing the power series and Laurent series, we see that the only term appearing in the series must be the constant $a_0$ only.
For part (c), the hint is to look at the Laurent expansion of $f(frac 1z)$ again, and recover the series for $f(z)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In your solution to part (a), notice that the Laurent series you have written down is for $f(frac 1z)$, so the correct formula is $f(frac 1z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n z^n +S(z)$. So by the change of coordinates $zmapsto frac 1z$, we get $f(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_nfrac 1{z^n} +S(frac 1z)$. So the $g(z)$ in the question is actually $sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$. As $|z|toinfty$, this series indeed tends to $a_0$, which is finite. As for $zto 0$. Now by looking that the Laurent series again, we see that $S(frac 1z)$ has removable singularity at $z=0$. So $g(z)=f(z)-S(frac 1z)$ also has removable singularity at $z=0$, in other words the limit as $zto 0$ exists.
For part (b), holomorphicity of $g(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$ follows directly from $g$ having removable singularity at $0$. By comparing the power series and Laurent series, we see that the only term appearing in the series must be the constant $a_0$ only.
For part (c), the hint is to look at the Laurent expansion of $f(frac 1z)$ again, and recover the series for $f(z)$.
$endgroup$
In your solution to part (a), notice that the Laurent series you have written down is for $f(frac 1z)$, so the correct formula is $f(frac 1z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n z^n +S(z)$. So by the change of coordinates $zmapsto frac 1z$, we get $f(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_nfrac 1{z^n} +S(frac 1z)$. So the $g(z)$ in the question is actually $sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$. As $|z|toinfty$, this series indeed tends to $a_0$, which is finite. As for $zto 0$. Now by looking that the Laurent series again, we see that $S(frac 1z)$ has removable singularity at $z=0$. So $g(z)=f(z)-S(frac 1z)$ also has removable singularity at $z=0$, in other words the limit as $zto 0$ exists.
For part (b), holomorphicity of $g(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$ follows directly from $g$ having removable singularity at $0$. By comparing the power series and Laurent series, we see that the only term appearing in the series must be the constant $a_0$ only.
For part (c), the hint is to look at the Laurent expansion of $f(frac 1z)$ again, and recover the series for $f(z)$.
answered Mar 22 at 3:53
lEmlEm
3,4321921
3,4321921
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157589%2ff-bbbc-to-bbbc-is-an-entire-function-s-t-fz-to-infty-as-z%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown