$f : Bbb{C} to Bbb{C}$ is an entire function s.t. $|f(z)| to infty$ as $|z| to infty$. Prove $f$ is a...

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

RequirePermission not working

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?

Does HR tell a hiring manager about salary negotiations?

Why does the nucleus not repel itself?

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

Old scifi movie from the 50s or 60s with men in solid red uniforms who interrogate a spy from the past

If climate change impact can be observed in nature, has that had any effect on rural, i.e. farming community, perception of the scientific consensus?

Loose spokes after only a few rides

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

Is it safe to harvest rainwater that fell on solar panels?

Kerning for subscripts of sigma?

Is bread bad for ducks?

What is the most efficient way to store a numeric range?

Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation

Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?

Geography at the pixel level

Getting crown tickets for Statue of Liberty

Falsification in Math vs Science

What do these terms in Caesar's Gallic Wars mean?

Is there a way to generate a uniformly distributed point on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers?

Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?



$f : Bbb{C} to Bbb{C}$ is an entire function s.t. $|f(z)| to infty$ as $|z| to infty$. Prove $f$ is a polynomial.



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InIf $F$ is entire with removable singularity at $infty$, then $F$ is constant?bounded real part then removable singularityAt $z=0$ the function $f(z)=exp({zover 1-cos z})$ hasMust an entire function be bounded in any open disk around the origin?Extending an analytic function to an entire functionNot understanding how to use the following information: $f$ is entire, and $lim _{|z| rightarrow infty} frac{f(z)}{z^2}=2i$Prove that $fequiv 0$ where $f$ is entireFind all entire function $f$ such that $lim_{zto infty}left|frac{f(z)}{z}right|=0$problem on existence of entire functionShouldn't a entire function be strictly a polynomial?












4












$begingroup$


Let $f : mathbb{C} rightarrow mathbb{C}$ be an entire function such that $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$. Prove that $f$ is a polynomial by following the steps below.



(a) Observe that the function $f(1/z)$ defined in $C setminus{0}$ has a pole at the origin. Let $S$ be the
singular part of its Laurent series around $0$. Argue that $g(z) = f(z) − S(1/z)$ approaches
finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$.



(b) Prove that $g$ extends to a bounded entire function and is therefore constant.



(c) Deduce that $f$ is a polynomial.





I know there are solutions to this but not with these steps. I have been given this as an assignment and really need help to figure out how to write the solution.



For point (a) I wrote



In order for $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$, is equavalent saying $|f(frac{1}{z})| rightarrow infty$ as $z rightarrow 0$. So $f(z)$ can be written in Laurent series around the point $0$ such that $sum_{n=-infty}^infty a_nz^n = g(z) + s(frac{1}{z})$ given $g(z)$ is the power series $sum_{n=0}^infty a_nz^n$ and $S$ is the singular part of its Laurent series around $0$.



Hence,
$ g(z)= f(z) - s(frac{1}{z})$ and $g(z)$ tends to a
finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$ given the power series.



For (b) I wrote



Only removable singularities are left in $g(z)$. So
with Riemann's removable singularity theorem, with $p$ being some removable singularity. $g(z)$ can be extended continuously and holomorphically at $p$ and since $g(z)$ is bonded on some disc around $p$ excluding the point $p$ with a radius bigger than $0$. Hence the extended function is bounded as well and by Liouville's theorem, it is a constant function.



And I have no clue how to answer (c), sorry for the long post and thanks in advance!!!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$


    Let $f : mathbb{C} rightarrow mathbb{C}$ be an entire function such that $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$. Prove that $f$ is a polynomial by following the steps below.



    (a) Observe that the function $f(1/z)$ defined in $C setminus{0}$ has a pole at the origin. Let $S$ be the
    singular part of its Laurent series around $0$. Argue that $g(z) = f(z) − S(1/z)$ approaches
    finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$.



    (b) Prove that $g$ extends to a bounded entire function and is therefore constant.



    (c) Deduce that $f$ is a polynomial.





    I know there are solutions to this but not with these steps. I have been given this as an assignment and really need help to figure out how to write the solution.



    For point (a) I wrote



    In order for $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$, is equavalent saying $|f(frac{1}{z})| rightarrow infty$ as $z rightarrow 0$. So $f(z)$ can be written in Laurent series around the point $0$ such that $sum_{n=-infty}^infty a_nz^n = g(z) + s(frac{1}{z})$ given $g(z)$ is the power series $sum_{n=0}^infty a_nz^n$ and $S$ is the singular part of its Laurent series around $0$.



    Hence,
    $ g(z)= f(z) - s(frac{1}{z})$ and $g(z)$ tends to a
    finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$ given the power series.



    For (b) I wrote



    Only removable singularities are left in $g(z)$. So
    with Riemann's removable singularity theorem, with $p$ being some removable singularity. $g(z)$ can be extended continuously and holomorphically at $p$ and since $g(z)$ is bonded on some disc around $p$ excluding the point $p$ with a radius bigger than $0$. Hence the extended function is bounded as well and by Liouville's theorem, it is a constant function.



    And I have no clue how to answer (c), sorry for the long post and thanks in advance!!!










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4


      1



      $begingroup$


      Let $f : mathbb{C} rightarrow mathbb{C}$ be an entire function such that $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$. Prove that $f$ is a polynomial by following the steps below.



      (a) Observe that the function $f(1/z)$ defined in $C setminus{0}$ has a pole at the origin. Let $S$ be the
      singular part of its Laurent series around $0$. Argue that $g(z) = f(z) − S(1/z)$ approaches
      finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$.



      (b) Prove that $g$ extends to a bounded entire function and is therefore constant.



      (c) Deduce that $f$ is a polynomial.





      I know there are solutions to this but not with these steps. I have been given this as an assignment and really need help to figure out how to write the solution.



      For point (a) I wrote



      In order for $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$, is equavalent saying $|f(frac{1}{z})| rightarrow infty$ as $z rightarrow 0$. So $f(z)$ can be written in Laurent series around the point $0$ such that $sum_{n=-infty}^infty a_nz^n = g(z) + s(frac{1}{z})$ given $g(z)$ is the power series $sum_{n=0}^infty a_nz^n$ and $S$ is the singular part of its Laurent series around $0$.



      Hence,
      $ g(z)= f(z) - s(frac{1}{z})$ and $g(z)$ tends to a
      finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$ given the power series.



      For (b) I wrote



      Only removable singularities are left in $g(z)$. So
      with Riemann's removable singularity theorem, with $p$ being some removable singularity. $g(z)$ can be extended continuously and holomorphically at $p$ and since $g(z)$ is bonded on some disc around $p$ excluding the point $p$ with a radius bigger than $0$. Hence the extended function is bounded as well and by Liouville's theorem, it is a constant function.



      And I have no clue how to answer (c), sorry for the long post and thanks in advance!!!










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $f : mathbb{C} rightarrow mathbb{C}$ be an entire function such that $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$. Prove that $f$ is a polynomial by following the steps below.



      (a) Observe that the function $f(1/z)$ defined in $C setminus{0}$ has a pole at the origin. Let $S$ be the
      singular part of its Laurent series around $0$. Argue that $g(z) = f(z) − S(1/z)$ approaches
      finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$.



      (b) Prove that $g$ extends to a bounded entire function and is therefore constant.



      (c) Deduce that $f$ is a polynomial.





      I know there are solutions to this but not with these steps. I have been given this as an assignment and really need help to figure out how to write the solution.



      For point (a) I wrote



      In order for $|f(z)| rightarrow infty$ as $|z| rightarrow infty$, is equavalent saying $|f(frac{1}{z})| rightarrow infty$ as $z rightarrow 0$. So $f(z)$ can be written in Laurent series around the point $0$ such that $sum_{n=-infty}^infty a_nz^n = g(z) + s(frac{1}{z})$ given $g(z)$ is the power series $sum_{n=0}^infty a_nz^n$ and $S$ is the singular part of its Laurent series around $0$.



      Hence,
      $ g(z)= f(z) - s(frac{1}{z})$ and $g(z)$ tends to a
      finite limits as $z rightarrow 0$ and as $|z| rightarrow infty$ given the power series.



      For (b) I wrote



      Only removable singularities are left in $g(z)$. So
      with Riemann's removable singularity theorem, with $p$ being some removable singularity. $g(z)$ can be extended continuously and holomorphically at $p$ and since $g(z)$ is bonded on some disc around $p$ excluding the point $p$ with a radius bigger than $0$. Hence the extended function is bounded as well and by Liouville's theorem, it is a constant function.



      And I have no clue how to answer (c), sorry for the long post and thanks in advance!!!







      complex-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 22 at 2:45









      Andrews

      1,2812423




      1,2812423










      asked Mar 22 at 0:37









      ChengCheng

      233




      233






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          In your solution to part (a), notice that the Laurent series you have written down is for $f(frac 1z)$, so the correct formula is $f(frac 1z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n z^n +S(z)$. So by the change of coordinates $zmapsto frac 1z$, we get $f(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_nfrac 1{z^n} +S(frac 1z)$. So the $g(z)$ in the question is actually $sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$. As $|z|toinfty$, this series indeed tends to $a_0$, which is finite. As for $zto 0$. Now by looking that the Laurent series again, we see that $S(frac 1z)$ has removable singularity at $z=0$. So $g(z)=f(z)-S(frac 1z)$ also has removable singularity at $z=0$, in other words the limit as $zto 0$ exists.



          For part (b), holomorphicity of $g(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$ follows directly from $g$ having removable singularity at $0$. By comparing the power series and Laurent series, we see that the only term appearing in the series must be the constant $a_0$ only.



          For part (c), the hint is to look at the Laurent expansion of $f(frac 1z)$ again, and recover the series for $f(z)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157589%2ff-bbbc-to-bbbc-is-an-entire-function-s-t-fz-to-infty-as-z%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            In your solution to part (a), notice that the Laurent series you have written down is for $f(frac 1z)$, so the correct formula is $f(frac 1z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n z^n +S(z)$. So by the change of coordinates $zmapsto frac 1z$, we get $f(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_nfrac 1{z^n} +S(frac 1z)$. So the $g(z)$ in the question is actually $sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$. As $|z|toinfty$, this series indeed tends to $a_0$, which is finite. As for $zto 0$. Now by looking that the Laurent series again, we see that $S(frac 1z)$ has removable singularity at $z=0$. So $g(z)=f(z)-S(frac 1z)$ also has removable singularity at $z=0$, in other words the limit as $zto 0$ exists.



            For part (b), holomorphicity of $g(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$ follows directly from $g$ having removable singularity at $0$. By comparing the power series and Laurent series, we see that the only term appearing in the series must be the constant $a_0$ only.



            For part (c), the hint is to look at the Laurent expansion of $f(frac 1z)$ again, and recover the series for $f(z)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              In your solution to part (a), notice that the Laurent series you have written down is for $f(frac 1z)$, so the correct formula is $f(frac 1z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n z^n +S(z)$. So by the change of coordinates $zmapsto frac 1z$, we get $f(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_nfrac 1{z^n} +S(frac 1z)$. So the $g(z)$ in the question is actually $sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$. As $|z|toinfty$, this series indeed tends to $a_0$, which is finite. As for $zto 0$. Now by looking that the Laurent series again, we see that $S(frac 1z)$ has removable singularity at $z=0$. So $g(z)=f(z)-S(frac 1z)$ also has removable singularity at $z=0$, in other words the limit as $zto 0$ exists.



              For part (b), holomorphicity of $g(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$ follows directly from $g$ having removable singularity at $0$. By comparing the power series and Laurent series, we see that the only term appearing in the series must be the constant $a_0$ only.



              For part (c), the hint is to look at the Laurent expansion of $f(frac 1z)$ again, and recover the series for $f(z)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                In your solution to part (a), notice that the Laurent series you have written down is for $f(frac 1z)$, so the correct formula is $f(frac 1z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n z^n +S(z)$. So by the change of coordinates $zmapsto frac 1z$, we get $f(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_nfrac 1{z^n} +S(frac 1z)$. So the $g(z)$ in the question is actually $sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$. As $|z|toinfty$, this series indeed tends to $a_0$, which is finite. As for $zto 0$. Now by looking that the Laurent series again, we see that $S(frac 1z)$ has removable singularity at $z=0$. So $g(z)=f(z)-S(frac 1z)$ also has removable singularity at $z=0$, in other words the limit as $zto 0$ exists.



                For part (b), holomorphicity of $g(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$ follows directly from $g$ having removable singularity at $0$. By comparing the power series and Laurent series, we see that the only term appearing in the series must be the constant $a_0$ only.



                For part (c), the hint is to look at the Laurent expansion of $f(frac 1z)$ again, and recover the series for $f(z)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                In your solution to part (a), notice that the Laurent series you have written down is for $f(frac 1z)$, so the correct formula is $f(frac 1z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n z^n +S(z)$. So by the change of coordinates $zmapsto frac 1z$, we get $f(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_nfrac 1{z^n} +S(frac 1z)$. So the $g(z)$ in the question is actually $sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$. As $|z|toinfty$, this series indeed tends to $a_0$, which is finite. As for $zto 0$. Now by looking that the Laurent series again, we see that $S(frac 1z)$ has removable singularity at $z=0$. So $g(z)=f(z)-S(frac 1z)$ also has removable singularity at $z=0$, in other words the limit as $zto 0$ exists.



                For part (b), holomorphicity of $g(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty a_n frac 1{z^n}$ follows directly from $g$ having removable singularity at $0$. By comparing the power series and Laurent series, we see that the only term appearing in the series must be the constant $a_0$ only.



                For part (c), the hint is to look at the Laurent expansion of $f(frac 1z)$ again, and recover the series for $f(z)$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 22 at 3:53









                lEmlEm

                3,4321921




                3,4321921






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157589%2ff-bbbc-to-bbbc-is-an-entire-function-s-t-fz-to-infty-as-z%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Nidaros erkebispedøme

                    Birsay

                    Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...