Is there a way to generate a uniformly distributed point on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow to find a random axis or unit vector in 3D?Picking random points in the volume of sphere with uniform probabilityIs a sphere a closed set?Random Point Sampling From a Set with Certain GeometryHow to Create a Plane Inside A CubeAlgorithm to generate random points in n-Sphere?Sampling on Axis-Aligned Spherical QuadRandom 3D points uniformly distributed on an ellipse shaped window of a sphereCompensating for distortion when projecting a 2D texture onto a sphereFind the relative radial position of a point within an ellipsoid

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

Will it cause any balance problems to have PCs level up and gain the benefits of a long rest mid-fight?

How do I free up internal storage if I don't have any apps downloaded?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

Can an undergraduate be advised by a professor who is very far away?

Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?

Why couldn't they take pictures of a closer black hole?

How can I have a shield and a way of attacking with a ranged weapon at the same time?

Pokemon Turn Based battle (Python)

Does HR tell a hiring manager about salary negotiations?

Loose spokes after only a few rides

Is it safe to harvest rainwater that fell on solar panels?

Why does the nucleus not repel itself?

What is this business jet?

What is the most efficient way to store a numeric range?

How to charge AirPods to keep battery healthy?

What does もの mean in this sentence?

How much of the clove should I use when using big garlic heads?

How can I add encounters in the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign without giving PCs too much XP?

Is there a way to generate a uniformly distributed point on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers?

Geography at the pixel level

How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?

Is Cinnamon a desktop environment or a window manager? (Or both?)

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?



Is there a way to generate a uniformly distributed point on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow to find a random axis or unit vector in 3D?Picking random points in the volume of sphere with uniform probabilityIs a sphere a closed set?Random Point Sampling From a Set with Certain GeometryHow to Create a Plane Inside A CubeAlgorithm to generate random points in n-Sphere?Sampling on Axis-Aligned Spherical QuadRandom 3D points uniformly distributed on an ellipse shaped window of a sphereCompensating for distortion when projecting a 2D texture onto a sphereFind the relative radial position of a point within an ellipsoid










4












$begingroup$


The obvious solution of Lattitude & Longitude doesn't work because it generates points more densely near the poles, and the other thing I came up with (Pick a random point in the unit cube, if it's in the sphere map it to the surface, and restart if it's outside) doesn't always find a point within a fixed number of tries.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    So what you want is a uniform distribution. It would be helpful to state this explicitly.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Distribute longitude uniformly and the sine of the latitude uniformly. Then the distribution of points on the sphere will be uniform.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @robjohn thank you, you're right that I forgot to specify that.
    $endgroup$
    – The Zach Man
    1 hour ago















4












$begingroup$


The obvious solution of Lattitude & Longitude doesn't work because it generates points more densely near the poles, and the other thing I came up with (Pick a random point in the unit cube, if it's in the sphere map it to the surface, and restart if it's outside) doesn't always find a point within a fixed number of tries.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    So what you want is a uniform distribution. It would be helpful to state this explicitly.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Distribute longitude uniformly and the sine of the latitude uniformly. Then the distribution of points on the sphere will be uniform.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @robjohn thank you, you're right that I forgot to specify that.
    $endgroup$
    – The Zach Man
    1 hour ago













4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


The obvious solution of Lattitude & Longitude doesn't work because it generates points more densely near the poles, and the other thing I came up with (Pick a random point in the unit cube, if it's in the sphere map it to the surface, and restart if it's outside) doesn't always find a point within a fixed number of tries.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The obvious solution of Lattitude & Longitude doesn't work because it generates points more densely near the poles, and the other thing I came up with (Pick a random point in the unit cube, if it's in the sphere map it to the surface, and restart if it's outside) doesn't always find a point within a fixed number of tries.







geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 54 mins ago









robjohn

271k27313642




271k27313642










asked 3 hours ago









The Zach ManThe Zach Man

1107




1107











  • $begingroup$
    So what you want is a uniform distribution. It would be helpful to state this explicitly.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Distribute longitude uniformly and the sine of the latitude uniformly. Then the distribution of points on the sphere will be uniform.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @robjohn thank you, you're right that I forgot to specify that.
    $endgroup$
    – The Zach Man
    1 hour ago
















  • $begingroup$
    So what you want is a uniform distribution. It would be helpful to state this explicitly.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Distribute longitude uniformly and the sine of the latitude uniformly. Then the distribution of points on the sphere will be uniform.
    $endgroup$
    – robjohn
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @robjohn thank you, you're right that I forgot to specify that.
    $endgroup$
    – The Zach Man
    1 hour ago















$begingroup$
So what you want is a uniform distribution. It would be helpful to state this explicitly.
$endgroup$
– robjohn
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
So what you want is a uniform distribution. It would be helpful to state this explicitly.
$endgroup$
– robjohn
3 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Distribute longitude uniformly and the sine of the latitude uniformly. Then the distribution of points on the sphere will be uniform.
$endgroup$
– robjohn
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Distribute longitude uniformly and the sine of the latitude uniformly. Then the distribution of points on the sphere will be uniform.
$endgroup$
– robjohn
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
@robjohn thank you, you're right that I forgot to specify that.
$endgroup$
– The Zach Man
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@robjohn thank you, you're right that I forgot to specify that.
$endgroup$
– The Zach Man
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

The Lambert cylindrical equal area projection maps the sphere to a cylinder, area to equal area. It is easy to generate a uniform distribution on a cylinder. Simply map it back to the sphere.



For $(u_1,u_2)$ uniform on $[0,1]^2$, either



$mathrmlat=arcsin(2u_1-1),mathrmlon=2pi u_2$



or



$z=2u_1-1,x=sqrt1-z^2cos(2pi u_2),y=sqrt1-z^2sin(2pi u_2)$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    Your method, even though it doesn't finish in a fixed number of times, is a reasonable way to do it. Each trial succeeds with probability $fracpi6$, which is better than $frac12$: the average number of trials is less than $2$.



    Another standard method is to use the normal distribution. Generate $x, y, z$ independently from a standard normal distribution, then take the point $(x,y,z)$ and divide it by $sqrtx^2+y^2+z^2$ as you did for points inside the cube. The multivariate normal distribution is rotationally symmetric, so this will get you evenly distributed points on the sphere.



    (The Box–Muller transform is one way to generate normally distributed random numbers, and some versions of it do not use rejection sampling, so they can be done with a "fixed amount" of randomness.)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3184449%2fis-there-a-way-to-generate-a-uniformly-distributed-point-on-a-sphere-from-a-fixe%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      5












      $begingroup$

      The Lambert cylindrical equal area projection maps the sphere to a cylinder, area to equal area. It is easy to generate a uniform distribution on a cylinder. Simply map it back to the sphere.



      For $(u_1,u_2)$ uniform on $[0,1]^2$, either



      $mathrmlat=arcsin(2u_1-1),mathrmlon=2pi u_2$



      or



      $z=2u_1-1,x=sqrt1-z^2cos(2pi u_2),y=sqrt1-z^2sin(2pi u_2)$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        5












        $begingroup$

        The Lambert cylindrical equal area projection maps the sphere to a cylinder, area to equal area. It is easy to generate a uniform distribution on a cylinder. Simply map it back to the sphere.



        For $(u_1,u_2)$ uniform on $[0,1]^2$, either



        $mathrmlat=arcsin(2u_1-1),mathrmlon=2pi u_2$



        or



        $z=2u_1-1,x=sqrt1-z^2cos(2pi u_2),y=sqrt1-z^2sin(2pi u_2)$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          The Lambert cylindrical equal area projection maps the sphere to a cylinder, area to equal area. It is easy to generate a uniform distribution on a cylinder. Simply map it back to the sphere.



          For $(u_1,u_2)$ uniform on $[0,1]^2$, either



          $mathrmlat=arcsin(2u_1-1),mathrmlon=2pi u_2$



          or



          $z=2u_1-1,x=sqrt1-z^2cos(2pi u_2),y=sqrt1-z^2sin(2pi u_2)$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The Lambert cylindrical equal area projection maps the sphere to a cylinder, area to equal area. It is easy to generate a uniform distribution on a cylinder. Simply map it back to the sphere.



          For $(u_1,u_2)$ uniform on $[0,1]^2$, either



          $mathrmlat=arcsin(2u_1-1),mathrmlon=2pi u_2$



          or



          $z=2u_1-1,x=sqrt1-z^2cos(2pi u_2),y=sqrt1-z^2sin(2pi u_2)$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          robjohnrobjohn

          271k27313642




          271k27313642





















              3












              $begingroup$

              Your method, even though it doesn't finish in a fixed number of times, is a reasonable way to do it. Each trial succeeds with probability $fracpi6$, which is better than $frac12$: the average number of trials is less than $2$.



              Another standard method is to use the normal distribution. Generate $x, y, z$ independently from a standard normal distribution, then take the point $(x,y,z)$ and divide it by $sqrtx^2+y^2+z^2$ as you did for points inside the cube. The multivariate normal distribution is rotationally symmetric, so this will get you evenly distributed points on the sphere.



              (The Box–Muller transform is one way to generate normally distributed random numbers, and some versions of it do not use rejection sampling, so they can be done with a "fixed amount" of randomness.)






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                3












                $begingroup$

                Your method, even though it doesn't finish in a fixed number of times, is a reasonable way to do it. Each trial succeeds with probability $fracpi6$, which is better than $frac12$: the average number of trials is less than $2$.



                Another standard method is to use the normal distribution. Generate $x, y, z$ independently from a standard normal distribution, then take the point $(x,y,z)$ and divide it by $sqrtx^2+y^2+z^2$ as you did for points inside the cube. The multivariate normal distribution is rotationally symmetric, so this will get you evenly distributed points on the sphere.



                (The Box–Muller transform is one way to generate normally distributed random numbers, and some versions of it do not use rejection sampling, so they can be done with a "fixed amount" of randomness.)






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  Your method, even though it doesn't finish in a fixed number of times, is a reasonable way to do it. Each trial succeeds with probability $fracpi6$, which is better than $frac12$: the average number of trials is less than $2$.



                  Another standard method is to use the normal distribution. Generate $x, y, z$ independently from a standard normal distribution, then take the point $(x,y,z)$ and divide it by $sqrtx^2+y^2+z^2$ as you did for points inside the cube. The multivariate normal distribution is rotationally symmetric, so this will get you evenly distributed points on the sphere.



                  (The Box–Muller transform is one way to generate normally distributed random numbers, and some versions of it do not use rejection sampling, so they can be done with a "fixed amount" of randomness.)






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Your method, even though it doesn't finish in a fixed number of times, is a reasonable way to do it. Each trial succeeds with probability $fracpi6$, which is better than $frac12$: the average number of trials is less than $2$.



                  Another standard method is to use the normal distribution. Generate $x, y, z$ independently from a standard normal distribution, then take the point $(x,y,z)$ and divide it by $sqrtx^2+y^2+z^2$ as you did for points inside the cube. The multivariate normal distribution is rotationally symmetric, so this will get you evenly distributed points on the sphere.



                  (The Box–Muller transform is one way to generate normally distributed random numbers, and some versions of it do not use rejection sampling, so they can be done with a "fixed amount" of randomness.)







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 3 hours ago









                  Misha LavrovMisha Lavrov

                  49k757107




                  49k757107



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3184449%2fis-there-a-way-to-generate-a-uniformly-distributed-point-on-a-sphere-from-a-fixe%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Nidaros erkebispedøme

                      Birsay

                      Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...