Upper volume bounds for submanifolds Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar...

Is there public access to the Meteor Crater in Arizona?

Weaponising the Grasp-at-a-Distance spell

What is the role of と after a noun when it doesn't appear to count or list anything?

Moving a wrapfig vertically to encroach partially on a subsection title

Random body shuffle every night—can we still function?

What order were files/directories output in dir?

Can an iPhone 7 be made to function as a NFC Tag?

One-one communication

Is there any word for a place full of confusion?

How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?

What is a more techy Technical Writer job title that isn't cutesy or confusing?

Asymptotics question

How often does castling occur in grandmaster games?

Why complex landing gears are used instead of simple,reliability and light weight muscle wire or shape memory alloys?

Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll?

Why is std::move not [[nodiscard]] in C++20?

What adaptations would allow standard fantasy dwarves to survive in the desert?

How to write capital alpha?

Central Vacuuming: Is it worth it, and how does it compare to normal vacuuming?

The Nth Gryphon Number

"klopfte jemand" or "jemand klopfte"?

What are the main differences between the original Stargate SG-1 and the Final Cut edition?

My mentor says to set image to Fine instead of RAW — how is this different from JPG?

Can two people see the same photon?



Upper volume bounds for submanifolds



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Upper bound on volume growthA question about an estimateGradient of a functionalwhat is the inner product appeared in front of the integral?Ricci tensor and average of a tensorCounterexample to the form of Gromov compactness theorem without a Ricci curvature boundlower bound on volume of ballsWhether Ricci flow keep the diagonal of metric and Ricci tensor?Existence of non-trivial smooth quasi-convex function on complete Riemannian manifold with finite-volume.Constant scalar curvature with positive Ricci curvature












2












$begingroup$


Let $f:Mto (N,g)$ be an immersion of a compact smooth manifold $M$ into a compact Riemannian manifold $(N,g)$. Let
$$
mathrm{Vol}(M,f^*g)=int_M dmathrm{vol}_{f^*g}
$$

be the volume of $M$ with respect to the pullback metric $f^*g$.



My question: Can we get an upper bound on the volume of $(M,f^*g)$ in terms of curvature properties of the metric $g$?



One possible idea I had: suppose that $(N,g)$ has Ricci curvature bounded below by $kappa$, i.e. there exists a constant $kappain mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
mathrm{Ric}^Ngeq (n-1)kappa.
$$

Does it follow that $(M,f^*g)$ also has Ricci curvature bounded below by some $kappa'in mathbb{R}$? If so, then we can bound $mathrm{Vol}(M,f^*g)$ above using the Bishop-Gromov inequality.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    First, there is always a $kappa'$, as a consequence of compactness. Second, control of $kappa'$ is not enough - you can embed $S^1$ into $S^3$ with arbitrarily large length, but $kappa' = 0$ on $S^1$. Perhaps control of the second fundamental form is enough?
    $endgroup$
    – Jason DeVito
    Mar 26 at 1:29












  • $begingroup$
    You have to restrict to embedding, or you can wrap around itself as many times as you wish.
    $endgroup$
    – Arctic Char
    Mar 26 at 3:02
















2












$begingroup$


Let $f:Mto (N,g)$ be an immersion of a compact smooth manifold $M$ into a compact Riemannian manifold $(N,g)$. Let
$$
mathrm{Vol}(M,f^*g)=int_M dmathrm{vol}_{f^*g}
$$

be the volume of $M$ with respect to the pullback metric $f^*g$.



My question: Can we get an upper bound on the volume of $(M,f^*g)$ in terms of curvature properties of the metric $g$?



One possible idea I had: suppose that $(N,g)$ has Ricci curvature bounded below by $kappa$, i.e. there exists a constant $kappain mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
mathrm{Ric}^Ngeq (n-1)kappa.
$$

Does it follow that $(M,f^*g)$ also has Ricci curvature bounded below by some $kappa'in mathbb{R}$? If so, then we can bound $mathrm{Vol}(M,f^*g)$ above using the Bishop-Gromov inequality.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    First, there is always a $kappa'$, as a consequence of compactness. Second, control of $kappa'$ is not enough - you can embed $S^1$ into $S^3$ with arbitrarily large length, but $kappa' = 0$ on $S^1$. Perhaps control of the second fundamental form is enough?
    $endgroup$
    – Jason DeVito
    Mar 26 at 1:29












  • $begingroup$
    You have to restrict to embedding, or you can wrap around itself as many times as you wish.
    $endgroup$
    – Arctic Char
    Mar 26 at 3:02














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Let $f:Mto (N,g)$ be an immersion of a compact smooth manifold $M$ into a compact Riemannian manifold $(N,g)$. Let
$$
mathrm{Vol}(M,f^*g)=int_M dmathrm{vol}_{f^*g}
$$

be the volume of $M$ with respect to the pullback metric $f^*g$.



My question: Can we get an upper bound on the volume of $(M,f^*g)$ in terms of curvature properties of the metric $g$?



One possible idea I had: suppose that $(N,g)$ has Ricci curvature bounded below by $kappa$, i.e. there exists a constant $kappain mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
mathrm{Ric}^Ngeq (n-1)kappa.
$$

Does it follow that $(M,f^*g)$ also has Ricci curvature bounded below by some $kappa'in mathbb{R}$? If so, then we can bound $mathrm{Vol}(M,f^*g)$ above using the Bishop-Gromov inequality.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $f:Mto (N,g)$ be an immersion of a compact smooth manifold $M$ into a compact Riemannian manifold $(N,g)$. Let
$$
mathrm{Vol}(M,f^*g)=int_M dmathrm{vol}_{f^*g}
$$

be the volume of $M$ with respect to the pullback metric $f^*g$.



My question: Can we get an upper bound on the volume of $(M,f^*g)$ in terms of curvature properties of the metric $g$?



One possible idea I had: suppose that $(N,g)$ has Ricci curvature bounded below by $kappa$, i.e. there exists a constant $kappain mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
mathrm{Ric}^Ngeq (n-1)kappa.
$$

Does it follow that $(M,f^*g)$ also has Ricci curvature bounded below by some $kappa'in mathbb{R}$? If so, then we can bound $mathrm{Vol}(M,f^*g)$ above using the Bishop-Gromov inequality.







differential-geometry metric-spaces riemannian-geometry smooth-manifolds






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 26 at 1:19









srpsrp

2828




2828












  • $begingroup$
    First, there is always a $kappa'$, as a consequence of compactness. Second, control of $kappa'$ is not enough - you can embed $S^1$ into $S^3$ with arbitrarily large length, but $kappa' = 0$ on $S^1$. Perhaps control of the second fundamental form is enough?
    $endgroup$
    – Jason DeVito
    Mar 26 at 1:29












  • $begingroup$
    You have to restrict to embedding, or you can wrap around itself as many times as you wish.
    $endgroup$
    – Arctic Char
    Mar 26 at 3:02


















  • $begingroup$
    First, there is always a $kappa'$, as a consequence of compactness. Second, control of $kappa'$ is not enough - you can embed $S^1$ into $S^3$ with arbitrarily large length, but $kappa' = 0$ on $S^1$. Perhaps control of the second fundamental form is enough?
    $endgroup$
    – Jason DeVito
    Mar 26 at 1:29












  • $begingroup$
    You have to restrict to embedding, or you can wrap around itself as many times as you wish.
    $endgroup$
    – Arctic Char
    Mar 26 at 3:02
















$begingroup$
First, there is always a $kappa'$, as a consequence of compactness. Second, control of $kappa'$ is not enough - you can embed $S^1$ into $S^3$ with arbitrarily large length, but $kappa' = 0$ on $S^1$. Perhaps control of the second fundamental form is enough?
$endgroup$
– Jason DeVito
Mar 26 at 1:29






$begingroup$
First, there is always a $kappa'$, as a consequence of compactness. Second, control of $kappa'$ is not enough - you can embed $S^1$ into $S^3$ with arbitrarily large length, but $kappa' = 0$ on $S^1$. Perhaps control of the second fundamental form is enough?
$endgroup$
– Jason DeVito
Mar 26 at 1:29














$begingroup$
You have to restrict to embedding, or you can wrap around itself as many times as you wish.
$endgroup$
– Arctic Char
Mar 26 at 3:02




$begingroup$
You have to restrict to embedding, or you can wrap around itself as many times as you wish.
$endgroup$
– Arctic Char
Mar 26 at 3:02










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3162575%2fupper-volume-bounds-for-submanifolds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3162575%2fupper-volume-bounds-for-submanifolds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Nidaros erkebispedøme

Birsay

Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...