Mixed random variable (Exponential distribution mixed with binomial distribution)Sum of exponential random...

What is the term when two people sing in harmony, but they aren't singing the same notes?

Should my PhD thesis be submitted under my legal name?

How can a jailer prevent the Forge Cleric's Artisan's Blessing from being used?

Superhero words!

What will be the temperature on Earth when Sun finishes its main sequence?

Identify a stage play about a VR experience in which participants are encouraged to simulate performing horrific activities

Can a Gentile theist be saved?

Can the harmonic series explain the origin of the major scale?

Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?

Giant Toughroad SLR 2 for 200 miles in two days, will it make it?

Greatest common substring

Was the picture area of a CRT a parallelogram (instead of a true rectangle)?

Have I saved too much for retirement so far?

Do all polymers contain either carbon or silicon?

Proof of Lemma: Every integer can be written as a product of primes

I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?

Can a Bard use an arcane focus?

Can a malicious addon access internet history and such in chrome/firefox?

For airliners, what prevents wing strikes on landing in bad weather?

A workplace installs custom certificates on personal devices, can this be used to decrypt HTTPS traffic?

Organic chemistry Iodoform Reaction

Calculating the number of days between 2 dates in Excel

Would it be legal for a US State to ban exports of a natural resource?

Is there enough fresh water in the world to eradicate the drinking water crisis?



Mixed random variable (Exponential distribution mixed with binomial distribution)


Sum of exponential random variable with different meansExponential Distribution, Statistics.Exponential distribution of random variableFailure time and exponential distributionDensity of the Sum of Two Exponential Random VariableRandom rate of exponential distributionTransformation of Random Variable $Y = -2ln X$exponential distribution of an exponential variableRandom variable with exponential distribution.Binomial distribution with random variable parameter













1












$begingroup$


Let $X$ be an exponential distribution of parameter $1$.



And let $Y$ be the binomial distribution of parameter $n$ and $p=1/2$.



We define $Z=frac{X}{Y+1}$. I'm trying to find the distribution of $Z$.



This is what I did :



Let $t>0$ we have $F(Z<t)=F(X<t(Y+1))=int_{0}^{t(Y+1)}exp(-x)dx=1-exp(-t(Y+1))$



and for $t<0$ we have $F(Z<t)=0.$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Let $X$ be an exponential distribution of parameter $1$.



    And let $Y$ be the binomial distribution of parameter $n$ and $p=1/2$.



    We define $Z=frac{X}{Y+1}$. I'm trying to find the distribution of $Z$.



    This is what I did :



    Let $t>0$ we have $F(Z<t)=F(X<t(Y+1))=int_{0}^{t(Y+1)}exp(-x)dx=1-exp(-t(Y+1))$



    and for $t<0$ we have $F(Z<t)=0.$










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Let $X$ be an exponential distribution of parameter $1$.



      And let $Y$ be the binomial distribution of parameter $n$ and $p=1/2$.



      We define $Z=frac{X}{Y+1}$. I'm trying to find the distribution of $Z$.



      This is what I did :



      Let $t>0$ we have $F(Z<t)=F(X<t(Y+1))=int_{0}^{t(Y+1)}exp(-x)dx=1-exp(-t(Y+1))$



      and for $t<0$ we have $F(Z<t)=0.$










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $X$ be an exponential distribution of parameter $1$.



      And let $Y$ be the binomial distribution of parameter $n$ and $p=1/2$.



      We define $Z=frac{X}{Y+1}$. I'm trying to find the distribution of $Z$.



      This is what I did :



      Let $t>0$ we have $F(Z<t)=F(X<t(Y+1))=int_{0}^{t(Y+1)}exp(-x)dx=1-exp(-t(Y+1))$



      and for $t<0$ we have $F(Z<t)=0.$







      probability probability-theory random-variables






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 14 at 20:36









      AnasAnas

      255




      255






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          You also need to sum over all possible values of Y.



          Let's condition over $Y$. We get:



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_k P(Z<t|Y=k) P(Y=k)$$



          So your net probability will become (using the fact that $Y$ is binomial):



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_{k=0}^n (1-e^{-t(k+1)}) {n choose k} p^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$



          $$ = sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k}p^k(1-p)^{n-k}- e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$
          $$ = 1-e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Why did we sum over all possible values of $Y$, instead of sum from $k=0$ to for example $k=j$ with $j<n$ ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:02










          • $begingroup$
            @Pandey can you please just write where exactly the first line come from ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:08










          • $begingroup$
            My counter question to that would be, why would we not sum over all possible values of $Y$? There is a probability that this value of $Y$ will be realized (whatever it might be) and conditional on that value of $Y$, there will be a certain probability $Z<t$.
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:12










          • $begingroup$
            yes makes sens, thank you
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:19










          • $begingroup$
            If this addressed your query, don't forget to mark as accepted answer :)
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:19











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3148471%2fmixed-random-variable-exponential-distribution-mixed-with-binomial-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          You also need to sum over all possible values of Y.



          Let's condition over $Y$. We get:



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_k P(Z<t|Y=k) P(Y=k)$$



          So your net probability will become (using the fact that $Y$ is binomial):



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_{k=0}^n (1-e^{-t(k+1)}) {n choose k} p^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$



          $$ = sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k}p^k(1-p)^{n-k}- e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$
          $$ = 1-e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Why did we sum over all possible values of $Y$, instead of sum from $k=0$ to for example $k=j$ with $j<n$ ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:02










          • $begingroup$
            @Pandey can you please just write where exactly the first line come from ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:08










          • $begingroup$
            My counter question to that would be, why would we not sum over all possible values of $Y$? There is a probability that this value of $Y$ will be realized (whatever it might be) and conditional on that value of $Y$, there will be a certain probability $Z<t$.
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:12










          • $begingroup$
            yes makes sens, thank you
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:19










          • $begingroup$
            If this addressed your query, don't forget to mark as accepted answer :)
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:19
















          1












          $begingroup$

          You also need to sum over all possible values of Y.



          Let's condition over $Y$. We get:



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_k P(Z<t|Y=k) P(Y=k)$$



          So your net probability will become (using the fact that $Y$ is binomial):



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_{k=0}^n (1-e^{-t(k+1)}) {n choose k} p^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$



          $$ = sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k}p^k(1-p)^{n-k}- e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$
          $$ = 1-e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Why did we sum over all possible values of $Y$, instead of sum from $k=0$ to for example $k=j$ with $j<n$ ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:02










          • $begingroup$
            @Pandey can you please just write where exactly the first line come from ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:08










          • $begingroup$
            My counter question to that would be, why would we not sum over all possible values of $Y$? There is a probability that this value of $Y$ will be realized (whatever it might be) and conditional on that value of $Y$, there will be a certain probability $Z<t$.
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:12










          • $begingroup$
            yes makes sens, thank you
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:19










          • $begingroup$
            If this addressed your query, don't forget to mark as accepted answer :)
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:19














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          You also need to sum over all possible values of Y.



          Let's condition over $Y$. We get:



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_k P(Z<t|Y=k) P(Y=k)$$



          So your net probability will become (using the fact that $Y$ is binomial):



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_{k=0}^n (1-e^{-t(k+1)}) {n choose k} p^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$



          $$ = sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k}p^k(1-p)^{n-k}- e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$
          $$ = 1-e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          You also need to sum over all possible values of Y.



          Let's condition over $Y$. We get:



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_k P(Z<t|Y=k) P(Y=k)$$



          So your net probability will become (using the fact that $Y$ is binomial):



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_{k=0}^n (1-e^{-t(k+1)}) {n choose k} p^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$



          $$ = sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k}p^k(1-p)^{n-k}- e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$
          $$ = 1-e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 14 at 21:38

























          answered Mar 14 at 20:46









          Rohit PandeyRohit Pandey

          1,6331023




          1,6331023












          • $begingroup$
            Why did we sum over all possible values of $Y$, instead of sum from $k=0$ to for example $k=j$ with $j<n$ ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:02










          • $begingroup$
            @Pandey can you please just write where exactly the first line come from ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:08










          • $begingroup$
            My counter question to that would be, why would we not sum over all possible values of $Y$? There is a probability that this value of $Y$ will be realized (whatever it might be) and conditional on that value of $Y$, there will be a certain probability $Z<t$.
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:12










          • $begingroup$
            yes makes sens, thank you
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:19










          • $begingroup$
            If this addressed your query, don't forget to mark as accepted answer :)
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:19


















          • $begingroup$
            Why did we sum over all possible values of $Y$, instead of sum from $k=0$ to for example $k=j$ with $j<n$ ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:02










          • $begingroup$
            @Pandey can you please just write where exactly the first line come from ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:08










          • $begingroup$
            My counter question to that would be, why would we not sum over all possible values of $Y$? There is a probability that this value of $Y$ will be realized (whatever it might be) and conditional on that value of $Y$, there will be a certain probability $Z<t$.
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:12










          • $begingroup$
            yes makes sens, thank you
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:19










          • $begingroup$
            If this addressed your query, don't forget to mark as accepted answer :)
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:19
















          $begingroup$
          Why did we sum over all possible values of $Y$, instead of sum from $k=0$ to for example $k=j$ with $j<n$ ?
          $endgroup$
          – Anas
          Mar 14 at 21:02




          $begingroup$
          Why did we sum over all possible values of $Y$, instead of sum from $k=0$ to for example $k=j$ with $j<n$ ?
          $endgroup$
          – Anas
          Mar 14 at 21:02












          $begingroup$
          @Pandey can you please just write where exactly the first line come from ?
          $endgroup$
          – Anas
          Mar 14 at 21:08




          $begingroup$
          @Pandey can you please just write where exactly the first line come from ?
          $endgroup$
          – Anas
          Mar 14 at 21:08












          $begingroup$
          My counter question to that would be, why would we not sum over all possible values of $Y$? There is a probability that this value of $Y$ will be realized (whatever it might be) and conditional on that value of $Y$, there will be a certain probability $Z<t$.
          $endgroup$
          – Rohit Pandey
          Mar 14 at 21:12




          $begingroup$
          My counter question to that would be, why would we not sum over all possible values of $Y$? There is a probability that this value of $Y$ will be realized (whatever it might be) and conditional on that value of $Y$, there will be a certain probability $Z<t$.
          $endgroup$
          – Rohit Pandey
          Mar 14 at 21:12












          $begingroup$
          yes makes sens, thank you
          $endgroup$
          – Anas
          Mar 14 at 21:19




          $begingroup$
          yes makes sens, thank you
          $endgroup$
          – Anas
          Mar 14 at 21:19












          $begingroup$
          If this addressed your query, don't forget to mark as accepted answer :)
          $endgroup$
          – Rohit Pandey
          Mar 14 at 21:19




          $begingroup$
          If this addressed your query, don't forget to mark as accepted answer :)
          $endgroup$
          – Rohit Pandey
          Mar 14 at 21:19


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3148471%2fmixed-random-variable-exponential-distribution-mixed-with-binomial-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Nidaros erkebispedøme

          Birsay

          Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...