Mixed random variable (Exponential distribution mixed with binomial distribution)Sum of exponential random...

A workplace installs custom certificates on personal devices, can this be used to decrypt HTTPS traffic?

Have I saved too much for retirement so far?

Hostile work environment after whistle-blowing on coworker and our boss. What do I do?

What does the "3am" section means in manpages?

What was required to accept "troll"?

What do you call the infoboxes with text and sometimes images on the side of a page we find in textbooks?

Reply ‘no position’ while the job posting is still there (‘HiWi’ position in Germany)

Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?

Giant Toughroad SLR 2 for 200 miles in two days, will it make it?

What (else) happened July 1st 1858 in London?

Should my PhD thesis be submitted under my legal name?

Visiting the UK as unmarried couple

Is there an Impartial Brexit Deal comparison site?

Who must act to prevent Brexit on March 29th?

Latex for-and in equation

I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?

Can I create an upright 7-foot × 5-foot wall with the Minor Illusion spell?

Partial sums of primes

Lightning Web Component - do I need to track changes for every single input field in a form

Is there an wasy way to program in Tikz something like the one in the image?

"lassen" in meaning "sich fassen"

Would it be legal for a US State to ban exports of a natural resource?

Why is delta-v is the most useful quantity for planning space travel?

What is the term when two people sing in harmony, but they aren't singing the same notes?



Mixed random variable (Exponential distribution mixed with binomial distribution)


Sum of exponential random variable with different meansExponential Distribution, Statistics.Exponential distribution of random variableFailure time and exponential distributionDensity of the Sum of Two Exponential Random VariableRandom rate of exponential distributionTransformation of Random Variable $Y = -2ln X$exponential distribution of an exponential variableRandom variable with exponential distribution.Binomial distribution with random variable parameter













1












$begingroup$


Let $X$ be an exponential distribution of parameter $1$.



And let $Y$ be the binomial distribution of parameter $n$ and $p=1/2$.



We define $Z=frac{X}{Y+1}$. I'm trying to find the distribution of $Z$.



This is what I did :



Let $t>0$ we have $F(Z<t)=F(X<t(Y+1))=int_{0}^{t(Y+1)}exp(-x)dx=1-exp(-t(Y+1))$



and for $t<0$ we have $F(Z<t)=0.$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Let $X$ be an exponential distribution of parameter $1$.



    And let $Y$ be the binomial distribution of parameter $n$ and $p=1/2$.



    We define $Z=frac{X}{Y+1}$. I'm trying to find the distribution of $Z$.



    This is what I did :



    Let $t>0$ we have $F(Z<t)=F(X<t(Y+1))=int_{0}^{t(Y+1)}exp(-x)dx=1-exp(-t(Y+1))$



    and for $t<0$ we have $F(Z<t)=0.$










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Let $X$ be an exponential distribution of parameter $1$.



      And let $Y$ be the binomial distribution of parameter $n$ and $p=1/2$.



      We define $Z=frac{X}{Y+1}$. I'm trying to find the distribution of $Z$.



      This is what I did :



      Let $t>0$ we have $F(Z<t)=F(X<t(Y+1))=int_{0}^{t(Y+1)}exp(-x)dx=1-exp(-t(Y+1))$



      and for $t<0$ we have $F(Z<t)=0.$










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $X$ be an exponential distribution of parameter $1$.



      And let $Y$ be the binomial distribution of parameter $n$ and $p=1/2$.



      We define $Z=frac{X}{Y+1}$. I'm trying to find the distribution of $Z$.



      This is what I did :



      Let $t>0$ we have $F(Z<t)=F(X<t(Y+1))=int_{0}^{t(Y+1)}exp(-x)dx=1-exp(-t(Y+1))$



      and for $t<0$ we have $F(Z<t)=0.$







      probability probability-theory random-variables






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 14 at 20:36









      AnasAnas

      255




      255






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          You also need to sum over all possible values of Y.



          Let's condition over $Y$. We get:



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_k P(Z<t|Y=k) P(Y=k)$$



          So your net probability will become (using the fact that $Y$ is binomial):



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_{k=0}^n (1-e^{-t(k+1)}) {n choose k} p^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$



          $$ = sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k}p^k(1-p)^{n-k}- e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$
          $$ = 1-e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Why did we sum over all possible values of $Y$, instead of sum from $k=0$ to for example $k=j$ with $j<n$ ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:02










          • $begingroup$
            @Pandey can you please just write where exactly the first line come from ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:08










          • $begingroup$
            My counter question to that would be, why would we not sum over all possible values of $Y$? There is a probability that this value of $Y$ will be realized (whatever it might be) and conditional on that value of $Y$, there will be a certain probability $Z<t$.
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:12










          • $begingroup$
            yes makes sens, thank you
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:19










          • $begingroup$
            If this addressed your query, don't forget to mark as accepted answer :)
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:19











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3148471%2fmixed-random-variable-exponential-distribution-mixed-with-binomial-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          You also need to sum over all possible values of Y.



          Let's condition over $Y$. We get:



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_k P(Z<t|Y=k) P(Y=k)$$



          So your net probability will become (using the fact that $Y$ is binomial):



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_{k=0}^n (1-e^{-t(k+1)}) {n choose k} p^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$



          $$ = sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k}p^k(1-p)^{n-k}- e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$
          $$ = 1-e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Why did we sum over all possible values of $Y$, instead of sum from $k=0$ to for example $k=j$ with $j<n$ ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:02










          • $begingroup$
            @Pandey can you please just write where exactly the first line come from ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:08










          • $begingroup$
            My counter question to that would be, why would we not sum over all possible values of $Y$? There is a probability that this value of $Y$ will be realized (whatever it might be) and conditional on that value of $Y$, there will be a certain probability $Z<t$.
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:12










          • $begingroup$
            yes makes sens, thank you
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:19










          • $begingroup$
            If this addressed your query, don't forget to mark as accepted answer :)
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:19
















          1












          $begingroup$

          You also need to sum over all possible values of Y.



          Let's condition over $Y$. We get:



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_k P(Z<t|Y=k) P(Y=k)$$



          So your net probability will become (using the fact that $Y$ is binomial):



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_{k=0}^n (1-e^{-t(k+1)}) {n choose k} p^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$



          $$ = sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k}p^k(1-p)^{n-k}- e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$
          $$ = 1-e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Why did we sum over all possible values of $Y$, instead of sum from $k=0$ to for example $k=j$ with $j<n$ ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:02










          • $begingroup$
            @Pandey can you please just write where exactly the first line come from ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:08










          • $begingroup$
            My counter question to that would be, why would we not sum over all possible values of $Y$? There is a probability that this value of $Y$ will be realized (whatever it might be) and conditional on that value of $Y$, there will be a certain probability $Z<t$.
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:12










          • $begingroup$
            yes makes sens, thank you
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:19










          • $begingroup$
            If this addressed your query, don't forget to mark as accepted answer :)
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:19














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          You also need to sum over all possible values of Y.



          Let's condition over $Y$. We get:



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_k P(Z<t|Y=k) P(Y=k)$$



          So your net probability will become (using the fact that $Y$ is binomial):



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_{k=0}^n (1-e^{-t(k+1)}) {n choose k} p^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$



          $$ = sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k}p^k(1-p)^{n-k}- e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$
          $$ = 1-e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          You also need to sum over all possible values of Y.



          Let's condition over $Y$. We get:



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_k P(Z<t|Y=k) P(Y=k)$$



          So your net probability will become (using the fact that $Y$ is binomial):



          $$P(Z<t) = sumlimits_{k=0}^n (1-e^{-t(k+1)}) {n choose k} p^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$



          $$ = sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k}p^k(1-p)^{n-k}- e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$
          $$ = 1-e^{-t}sumlimits_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (e^{-t}p)^k(1-p)^{n-k}$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 14 at 21:38

























          answered Mar 14 at 20:46









          Rohit PandeyRohit Pandey

          1,6331023




          1,6331023












          • $begingroup$
            Why did we sum over all possible values of $Y$, instead of sum from $k=0$ to for example $k=j$ with $j<n$ ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:02










          • $begingroup$
            @Pandey can you please just write where exactly the first line come from ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:08










          • $begingroup$
            My counter question to that would be, why would we not sum over all possible values of $Y$? There is a probability that this value of $Y$ will be realized (whatever it might be) and conditional on that value of $Y$, there will be a certain probability $Z<t$.
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:12










          • $begingroup$
            yes makes sens, thank you
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:19










          • $begingroup$
            If this addressed your query, don't forget to mark as accepted answer :)
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:19


















          • $begingroup$
            Why did we sum over all possible values of $Y$, instead of sum from $k=0$ to for example $k=j$ with $j<n$ ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:02










          • $begingroup$
            @Pandey can you please just write where exactly the first line come from ?
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:08










          • $begingroup$
            My counter question to that would be, why would we not sum over all possible values of $Y$? There is a probability that this value of $Y$ will be realized (whatever it might be) and conditional on that value of $Y$, there will be a certain probability $Z<t$.
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:12










          • $begingroup$
            yes makes sens, thank you
            $endgroup$
            – Anas
            Mar 14 at 21:19










          • $begingroup$
            If this addressed your query, don't forget to mark as accepted answer :)
            $endgroup$
            – Rohit Pandey
            Mar 14 at 21:19
















          $begingroup$
          Why did we sum over all possible values of $Y$, instead of sum from $k=0$ to for example $k=j$ with $j<n$ ?
          $endgroup$
          – Anas
          Mar 14 at 21:02




          $begingroup$
          Why did we sum over all possible values of $Y$, instead of sum from $k=0$ to for example $k=j$ with $j<n$ ?
          $endgroup$
          – Anas
          Mar 14 at 21:02












          $begingroup$
          @Pandey can you please just write where exactly the first line come from ?
          $endgroup$
          – Anas
          Mar 14 at 21:08




          $begingroup$
          @Pandey can you please just write where exactly the first line come from ?
          $endgroup$
          – Anas
          Mar 14 at 21:08












          $begingroup$
          My counter question to that would be, why would we not sum over all possible values of $Y$? There is a probability that this value of $Y$ will be realized (whatever it might be) and conditional on that value of $Y$, there will be a certain probability $Z<t$.
          $endgroup$
          – Rohit Pandey
          Mar 14 at 21:12




          $begingroup$
          My counter question to that would be, why would we not sum over all possible values of $Y$? There is a probability that this value of $Y$ will be realized (whatever it might be) and conditional on that value of $Y$, there will be a certain probability $Z<t$.
          $endgroup$
          – Rohit Pandey
          Mar 14 at 21:12












          $begingroup$
          yes makes sens, thank you
          $endgroup$
          – Anas
          Mar 14 at 21:19




          $begingroup$
          yes makes sens, thank you
          $endgroup$
          – Anas
          Mar 14 at 21:19












          $begingroup$
          If this addressed your query, don't forget to mark as accepted answer :)
          $endgroup$
          – Rohit Pandey
          Mar 14 at 21:19




          $begingroup$
          If this addressed your query, don't forget to mark as accepted answer :)
          $endgroup$
          – Rohit Pandey
          Mar 14 at 21:19


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3148471%2fmixed-random-variable-exponential-distribution-mixed-with-binomial-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Nidaros erkebispedøme

          Birsay

          Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...