Uniqueness of the integrand of a stochastic integralLocal martingale and integral conditionWhy is the drift...
Identify a stage play about a VR experience in which participants are encouraged to simulate performing horrific activities
Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?
Adding empty element to declared container without declaring type of element
Java - What do constructor type arguments mean when placed *before* the type?
Are taller landing gear bad for aircraft, particulary large airliners?
Can a Gentile theist be saved?
Visiting the UK as unmarried couple
What is the opposite of 'gravitas'?
Can the electrostatic force be infinite in magnitude?
Is it okay / does it make sense for another player to join a running game of Munchkin?
Hostile work environment after whistle-blowing on coworker and our boss. What do I do?
Meta programming: Declare a new struct on the fly
I2C signal and power over long range (10meter cable)
Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?
What was required to accept "troll"?
How can a jailer prevent the Forge Cleric's Artisan's Blessing from being used?
Is infinity mathematically observable?
Lifted its hind leg on or lifted its hind leg towards?
Greatest common substring
What is the term when two people sing in harmony, but they aren't singing the same notes?
Can the harmonic series explain the origin of the major scale?
Books on the History of math research at European universities
Why isn't KTEX's runway designation 10/28 instead of 9/27?
What to do when my ideas aren't chosen, when I strongly disagree with the chosen solution?
Uniqueness of the integrand of a stochastic integral
Local martingale and integral conditionWhy is the drift of an Itō process considered to be a Riemann integral even when it's not even Riemann integrable?Is the stochastic integral of the jumps process equal to zero for a continuous integrator?Are martingales progressively measurable? (Application to square integrable martingales)When is a stochastic integral a martingale?Pull out measurable function out of a stochastic integralLocal Martingales in J. Michael Steele (Stochastic Calculus and Financial Applications )A Question about the Fixed Point Method for SDEsAre we able to determine the distribution of a general stochastic integral?When is the local martingale in the Itō formula a (strict) martingale?
$begingroup$
Given a progressively measurable processes $Delta_s(omega),Delta'_s(omega)$ and real numbers $z',z$, there was a claim that if $$int_0^T(Delta_s-Delta's)mathrm{d}X_t=z-z'$$ for a non-trivial local martingale $X$, then $Delta_s=Delta'_s$. (All equal is meant to be in almost surely sense). I don't see why it is follows. Any hint are appreciated.
probability stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given a progressively measurable processes $Delta_s(omega),Delta'_s(omega)$ and real numbers $z',z$, there was a claim that if $$int_0^T(Delta_s-Delta's)mathrm{d}X_t=z-z'$$ for a non-trivial local martingale $X$, then $Delta_s=Delta'_s$. (All equal is meant to be in almost surely sense). I don't see why it is follows. Any hint are appreciated.
probability stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Do you assume that the equation holds for all $T>0$ or just for some fixed $T>0$...?The counterexamples here seem to suggest that assertion is, in general, wrong for fixed $T$ (... but perhaps I'm missing something).
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 14 at 20:49
$begingroup$
@saz Would it work for all t? Or with some more additional assumptions?
$endgroup$
– quallenjäger
Mar 14 at 21:11
$begingroup$
Well, under some additional assumptions it holds true, yes... but it would be good to know which statement exactly you are after. It seems that you read this claim somewhere, so perhaps you can look up the precise statement?
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 15 at 15:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given a progressively measurable processes $Delta_s(omega),Delta'_s(omega)$ and real numbers $z',z$, there was a claim that if $$int_0^T(Delta_s-Delta's)mathrm{d}X_t=z-z'$$ for a non-trivial local martingale $X$, then $Delta_s=Delta'_s$. (All equal is meant to be in almost surely sense). I don't see why it is follows. Any hint are appreciated.
probability stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus
$endgroup$
Given a progressively measurable processes $Delta_s(omega),Delta'_s(omega)$ and real numbers $z',z$, there was a claim that if $$int_0^T(Delta_s-Delta's)mathrm{d}X_t=z-z'$$ for a non-trivial local martingale $X$, then $Delta_s=Delta'_s$. (All equal is meant to be in almost surely sense). I don't see why it is follows. Any hint are appreciated.
probability stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus
probability stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus
asked Mar 14 at 20:10
quallenjägerquallenjäger
444519
444519
$begingroup$
Do you assume that the equation holds for all $T>0$ or just for some fixed $T>0$...?The counterexamples here seem to suggest that assertion is, in general, wrong for fixed $T$ (... but perhaps I'm missing something).
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 14 at 20:49
$begingroup$
@saz Would it work for all t? Or with some more additional assumptions?
$endgroup$
– quallenjäger
Mar 14 at 21:11
$begingroup$
Well, under some additional assumptions it holds true, yes... but it would be good to know which statement exactly you are after. It seems that you read this claim somewhere, so perhaps you can look up the precise statement?
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 15 at 15:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do you assume that the equation holds for all $T>0$ or just for some fixed $T>0$...?The counterexamples here seem to suggest that assertion is, in general, wrong for fixed $T$ (... but perhaps I'm missing something).
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 14 at 20:49
$begingroup$
@saz Would it work for all t? Or with some more additional assumptions?
$endgroup$
– quallenjäger
Mar 14 at 21:11
$begingroup$
Well, under some additional assumptions it holds true, yes... but it would be good to know which statement exactly you are after. It seems that you read this claim somewhere, so perhaps you can look up the precise statement?
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 15 at 15:02
$begingroup$
Do you assume that the equation holds for all $T>0$ or just for some fixed $T>0$...?The counterexamples here seem to suggest that assertion is, in general, wrong for fixed $T$ (... but perhaps I'm missing something).
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 14 at 20:49
$begingroup$
Do you assume that the equation holds for all $T>0$ or just for some fixed $T>0$...?The counterexamples here seem to suggest that assertion is, in general, wrong for fixed $T$ (... but perhaps I'm missing something).
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 14 at 20:49
$begingroup$
@saz Would it work for all t? Or with some more additional assumptions?
$endgroup$
– quallenjäger
Mar 14 at 21:11
$begingroup$
@saz Would it work for all t? Or with some more additional assumptions?
$endgroup$
– quallenjäger
Mar 14 at 21:11
$begingroup$
Well, under some additional assumptions it holds true, yes... but it would be good to know which statement exactly you are after. It seems that you read this claim somewhere, so perhaps you can look up the precise statement?
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 15 at 15:02
$begingroup$
Well, under some additional assumptions it holds true, yes... but it would be good to know which statement exactly you are after. It seems that you read this claim somewhere, so perhaps you can look up the precise statement?
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 15 at 15:02
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3148457%2funiqueness-of-the-integrand-of-a-stochastic-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3148457%2funiqueness-of-the-integrand-of-a-stochastic-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Do you assume that the equation holds for all $T>0$ or just for some fixed $T>0$...?The counterexamples here seem to suggest that assertion is, in general, wrong for fixed $T$ (... but perhaps I'm missing something).
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 14 at 20:49
$begingroup$
@saz Would it work for all t? Or with some more additional assumptions?
$endgroup$
– quallenjäger
Mar 14 at 21:11
$begingroup$
Well, under some additional assumptions it holds true, yes... but it would be good to know which statement exactly you are after. It seems that you read this claim somewhere, so perhaps you can look up the precise statement?
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 15 at 15:02