Are there any Sorcerer-only spells officially in Pathfinder? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Investigating suspects and evidence in a D&D3.x based worldAre there any spells that heal hit-points over time in Pathfinder or 3.5?Are there any 1st level Save-or-Die spells in Pathfinder?Is there a way not to stay behind with spell levels when playing Pathfinder Sorcerer?Is Pathfinder feasible without players knowing the rules?Will these low-level sorcerer spells and abilities stay useful for a high-level Pathfinder rogue?Sorcerer Multiclass learning spellsAre there any major balance issues with Sorcerers having access to these non-sorcerer spells?Are there any serious balance implications to letting a sorcerer take the Produce Flame cantrip?Optimizing a Crossblooded Sorcerer 1/Admixture School Savant Arcanist X
What helicopter has the most rotor blades?
`FindRoot [ ]`::jsing: Encountered a singular Jacobian at a point...WHY
Are there existing rules/lore for MTG planeswalkers?
Where to find documentation for `whois` command options?
Was there ever a LEGO store in Miami International Airport?
Specify the range of GridLines
What happened to Viserion in Season 7?
What does こした mean?
Processing ADC conversion result: DMA vs Processor Registers
Does using the Inspiration rules for character defects encourage My Guy Syndrome?
/bin/ls sorts differently than just ls
Why is water being consumed when my shutoff valve is closed?
Coin Game with infinite paradox
Deciphering death certificate writing
Will I lose my paid in full property
What to do with someone that cheated their way though university and a PhD program?
How was Lagrange appointed professor of mathematics so early?
Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?
What's called a person who work as someone who puts products on shelves in stores?
Suing a Police Officer Instead of the Police Department
Why does Java have support for time zone offsets with seconds precision?
When does Bran Stark remember Jamie pushing him?
TV series episode where humans nuke aliens before decrypting their message that states they come in peace
Did war bonds have better investment alternatives during WWII?
Are there any Sorcerer-only spells officially in Pathfinder?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Investigating suspects and evidence in a D&D3.x based worldAre there any spells that heal hit-points over time in Pathfinder or 3.5?Are there any 1st level Save-or-Die spells in Pathfinder?Is there a way not to stay behind with spell levels when playing Pathfinder Sorcerer?Is Pathfinder feasible without players knowing the rules?Will these low-level sorcerer spells and abilities stay useful for a high-level Pathfinder rogue?Sorcerer Multiclass learning spellsAre there any major balance issues with Sorcerers having access to these non-sorcerer spells?Are there any serious balance implications to letting a sorcerer take the Produce Flame cantrip?Optimizing a Crossblooded Sorcerer 1/Admixture School Savant Arcanist X
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
In D&D 3.5 many of the "Dragon-something" sourcebooks had spells that were on Sorcerer spell list, but not on Wizard one. Some of them was dual-purpose, other touched the draconic nature of sorcerer, etc.
Are there any spells like that officially in Pathfinder? Spells only for Sorcerers, preferably interacting with their bloodline powers? I understand they are no longer so much needed because Sorcerer now gets his own goodies, but I still would like to know.
Problem with searching for them: Even in D&D, they were listed as "Sorcerer / Wizard" spells, with "sorcerer only spell" in a fine print. So this isn't something I can easily filter out. Or, if I can, I don't know how.
I tried to Google "sorcerer only" on d20pfsrd.com but I only got results from Sorcerer’s Options: Beyond Bloodlines. Copyright 2011, Super Genius Games; Author: Owen K.C. Stephens and I don't know if it is even balanced sourcebook, allowed in organized play etc. I doubt its status as official rulebook for Pathfinder, but that's all the results I found.
pathfinder spells sorcerer
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In D&D 3.5 many of the "Dragon-something" sourcebooks had spells that were on Sorcerer spell list, but not on Wizard one. Some of them was dual-purpose, other touched the draconic nature of sorcerer, etc.
Are there any spells like that officially in Pathfinder? Spells only for Sorcerers, preferably interacting with their bloodline powers? I understand they are no longer so much needed because Sorcerer now gets his own goodies, but I still would like to know.
Problem with searching for them: Even in D&D, they were listed as "Sorcerer / Wizard" spells, with "sorcerer only spell" in a fine print. So this isn't something I can easily filter out. Or, if I can, I don't know how.
I tried to Google "sorcerer only" on d20pfsrd.com but I only got results from Sorcerer’s Options: Beyond Bloodlines. Copyright 2011, Super Genius Games; Author: Owen K.C. Stephens and I don't know if it is even balanced sourcebook, allowed in organized play etc. I doubt its status as official rulebook for Pathfinder, but that's all the results I found.
pathfinder spells sorcerer
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Since that's not really part of the question, let me clarify: No third-party content is allowed in organized play (PFS), even if some of those books are third-party published by actual paizo developers (such as Owen).
$endgroup$
– ShadowKras
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ShadowKras I'm not going to play organized play any time soon (sadly), I only use organized play rules as a gauge to be sure I don't min-max too much ;) Thanks for clarification, you confirmed that what I was able to find wasn't quite what I was really looking for.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In D&D 3.5 many of the "Dragon-something" sourcebooks had spells that were on Sorcerer spell list, but not on Wizard one. Some of them was dual-purpose, other touched the draconic nature of sorcerer, etc.
Are there any spells like that officially in Pathfinder? Spells only for Sorcerers, preferably interacting with their bloodline powers? I understand they are no longer so much needed because Sorcerer now gets his own goodies, but I still would like to know.
Problem with searching for them: Even in D&D, they were listed as "Sorcerer / Wizard" spells, with "sorcerer only spell" in a fine print. So this isn't something I can easily filter out. Or, if I can, I don't know how.
I tried to Google "sorcerer only" on d20pfsrd.com but I only got results from Sorcerer’s Options: Beyond Bloodlines. Copyright 2011, Super Genius Games; Author: Owen K.C. Stephens and I don't know if it is even balanced sourcebook, allowed in organized play etc. I doubt its status as official rulebook for Pathfinder, but that's all the results I found.
pathfinder spells sorcerer
$endgroup$
In D&D 3.5 many of the "Dragon-something" sourcebooks had spells that were on Sorcerer spell list, but not on Wizard one. Some of them was dual-purpose, other touched the draconic nature of sorcerer, etc.
Are there any spells like that officially in Pathfinder? Spells only for Sorcerers, preferably interacting with their bloodline powers? I understand they are no longer so much needed because Sorcerer now gets his own goodies, but I still would like to know.
Problem with searching for them: Even in D&D, they were listed as "Sorcerer / Wizard" spells, with "sorcerer only spell" in a fine print. So this isn't something I can easily filter out. Or, if I can, I don't know how.
I tried to Google "sorcerer only" on d20pfsrd.com but I only got results from Sorcerer’s Options: Beyond Bloodlines. Copyright 2011, Super Genius Games; Author: Owen K.C. Stephens and I don't know if it is even balanced sourcebook, allowed in organized play etc. I doubt its status as official rulebook for Pathfinder, but that's all the results I found.
pathfinder spells sorcerer
pathfinder spells sorcerer
asked 8 hours ago
MołotMołot
7,21514069
7,21514069
1
$begingroup$
Since that's not really part of the question, let me clarify: No third-party content is allowed in organized play (PFS), even if some of those books are third-party published by actual paizo developers (such as Owen).
$endgroup$
– ShadowKras
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ShadowKras I'm not going to play organized play any time soon (sadly), I only use organized play rules as a gauge to be sure I don't min-max too much ;) Thanks for clarification, you confirmed that what I was able to find wasn't quite what I was really looking for.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
8 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Since that's not really part of the question, let me clarify: No third-party content is allowed in organized play (PFS), even if some of those books are third-party published by actual paizo developers (such as Owen).
$endgroup$
– ShadowKras
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ShadowKras I'm not going to play organized play any time soon (sadly), I only use organized play rules as a gauge to be sure I don't min-max too much ;) Thanks for clarification, you confirmed that what I was able to find wasn't quite what I was really looking for.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Since that's not really part of the question, let me clarify: No third-party content is allowed in organized play (PFS), even if some of those books are third-party published by actual paizo developers (such as Owen).
$endgroup$
– ShadowKras
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Since that's not really part of the question, let me clarify: No third-party content is allowed in organized play (PFS), even if some of those books are third-party published by actual paizo developers (such as Owen).
$endgroup$
– ShadowKras
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ShadowKras I'm not going to play organized play any time soon (sadly), I only use organized play rules as a gauge to be sure I don't min-max too much ;) Thanks for clarification, you confirmed that what I was able to find wasn't quite what I was really looking for.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ShadowKras I'm not going to play organized play any time soon (sadly), I only use organized play rules as a gauge to be sure I don't min-max too much ;) Thanks for clarification, you confirmed that what I was able to find wasn't quite what I was really looking for.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
8 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There is none
Any spell that is granted by a bloodline and not available on the wizard/sorcerer spell list should qualify into that criteria, such as Bless from the Celestial Bloodline. But there are no spells that are exclusively available to sorcerers in general but not also available to wizards.
Only two spells mention "bloodline" in their text, Energy Hack and Tail Strike, but those are also available to wizards. And any spell that mentions "spontaneous" spellcasting is merely describing how it works slightly different against spontaneous casters, like Mindwipe, Spellcrash or Spellsteal. Finally, there are no spells that affect "known spells" either.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145690%2fare-there-any-sorcerer-only-spells-officially-in-pathfinder%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There is none
Any spell that is granted by a bloodline and not available on the wizard/sorcerer spell list should qualify into that criteria, such as Bless from the Celestial Bloodline. But there are no spells that are exclusively available to sorcerers in general but not also available to wizards.
Only two spells mention "bloodline" in their text, Energy Hack and Tail Strike, but those are also available to wizards. And any spell that mentions "spontaneous" spellcasting is merely describing how it works slightly different against spontaneous casters, like Mindwipe, Spellcrash or Spellsteal. Finally, there are no spells that affect "known spells" either.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is none
Any spell that is granted by a bloodline and not available on the wizard/sorcerer spell list should qualify into that criteria, such as Bless from the Celestial Bloodline. But there are no spells that are exclusively available to sorcerers in general but not also available to wizards.
Only two spells mention "bloodline" in their text, Energy Hack and Tail Strike, but those are also available to wizards. And any spell that mentions "spontaneous" spellcasting is merely describing how it works slightly different against spontaneous casters, like Mindwipe, Spellcrash or Spellsteal. Finally, there are no spells that affect "known spells" either.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is none
Any spell that is granted by a bloodline and not available on the wizard/sorcerer spell list should qualify into that criteria, such as Bless from the Celestial Bloodline. But there are no spells that are exclusively available to sorcerers in general but not also available to wizards.
Only two spells mention "bloodline" in their text, Energy Hack and Tail Strike, but those are also available to wizards. And any spell that mentions "spontaneous" spellcasting is merely describing how it works slightly different against spontaneous casters, like Mindwipe, Spellcrash or Spellsteal. Finally, there are no spells that affect "known spells" either.
$endgroup$
There is none
Any spell that is granted by a bloodline and not available on the wizard/sorcerer spell list should qualify into that criteria, such as Bless from the Celestial Bloodline. But there are no spells that are exclusively available to sorcerers in general but not also available to wizards.
Only two spells mention "bloodline" in their text, Energy Hack and Tail Strike, but those are also available to wizards. And any spell that mentions "spontaneous" spellcasting is merely describing how it works slightly different against spontaneous casters, like Mindwipe, Spellcrash or Spellsteal. Finally, there are no spells that affect "known spells" either.
edited 8 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
ShadowKrasShadowKras
54.1k377138
54.1k377138
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145690%2fare-there-any-sorcerer-only-spells-officially-in-pathfinder%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Since that's not really part of the question, let me clarify: No third-party content is allowed in organized play (PFS), even if some of those books are third-party published by actual paizo developers (such as Owen).
$endgroup$
– ShadowKras
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ShadowKras I'm not going to play organized play any time soon (sadly), I only use organized play rules as a gauge to be sure I don't min-max too much ;) Thanks for clarification, you confirmed that what I was able to find wasn't quite what I was really looking for.
$endgroup$
– Mołot
8 hours ago