Complex numbers $z=-3-4i$ polar formExpressing $e^z$ where $z=a+bi$ in polar form.Polar form of Complex numbersConverting to polar formComplex number polar form equationWhy is e used for polar form of complex numbers?Show $-27$ in polar form.writing in polar form (complex numbers)Are all complex exponentials in polar form?Complex numbers polar form changeDifferentiating polar functions using complex numbers

Extracting Dirichlet series coefficients

Magical attacks and overcoming damage resistance

What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?

Why did Rep. Omar conclude her criticism of US troops with the phrase "NotTodaySatan"?

Apply a different color ramp to subset of categorized symbols in QGIS?

How do I produce this Greek letter koppa: Ϟ in pdfLaTeX?

Find a stone which is not the lightest one

A strange hotel

How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?

Older movie/show about humans on derelict alien warship which refuels by passing through a star

All ASCII characters with a given bit count

Unknown code in script

Why did C use the -> operator instead of reusing the . operator?

SFDX - Create Objects with Custom Properties

Restricting the options of a lookup field, based on the value of another lookup field?

Mistake in years of experience in resume?

How to keep bees out of canned beverages?

How bug prioritization works in agile projects vs non agile

How to have a sharp product image?

What is purpose of DB Browser(dbbrowser.aspx) under admin tool?

Should the Product Owner dictate what info the UI needs to display?

Nails holding drywall

What does MLD stand for?

What is the best way to deal with NPC-NPC combat?



Complex numbers $z=-3-4i$ polar form


Expressing $e^z$ where $z=a+bi$ in polar form.Polar form of Complex numbersConverting to polar formComplex number polar form equationWhy is e used for polar form of complex numbers?Show $-27$ in polar form.writing in polar form (complex numbers)Are all complex exponentials in polar form?Complex numbers polar form changeDifferentiating polar functions using complex numbers













5












$begingroup$


Let $z=-3-4i$ . In polar form this becomes $[5, 233° ]$. The question then asks for $z^2$, so the polar form becomes $[25,466]$ However in the solution they did $466° -360° $ and I am unsure why they did this. Is it a rule that needs to be applied.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Nice question! I wish more people thought about their questions before posting.
    $endgroup$
    – mackycheese21
    2 hours ago
















5












$begingroup$


Let $z=-3-4i$ . In polar form this becomes $[5, 233° ]$. The question then asks for $z^2$, so the polar form becomes $[25,466]$ However in the solution they did $466° -360° $ and I am unsure why they did this. Is it a rule that needs to be applied.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Nice question! I wish more people thought about their questions before posting.
    $endgroup$
    – mackycheese21
    2 hours ago














5












5








5





$begingroup$


Let $z=-3-4i$ . In polar form this becomes $[5, 233° ]$. The question then asks for $z^2$, so the polar form becomes $[25,466]$ However in the solution they did $466° -360° $ and I am unsure why they did this. Is it a rule that needs to be applied.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $z=-3-4i$ . In polar form this becomes $[5, 233° ]$. The question then asks for $z^2$, so the polar form becomes $[25,466]$ However in the solution they did $466° -360° $ and I am unsure why they did this. Is it a rule that needs to be applied.







complex-numbers polar-coordinates






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 10 mins ago









Thomas Shelby

4,8382727




4,8382727










asked 9 hours ago









user221435user221435

335




335











  • $begingroup$
    Nice question! I wish more people thought about their questions before posting.
    $endgroup$
    – mackycheese21
    2 hours ago

















  • $begingroup$
    Nice question! I wish more people thought about their questions before posting.
    $endgroup$
    – mackycheese21
    2 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Nice question! I wish more people thought about their questions before posting.
$endgroup$
– mackycheese21
2 hours ago





$begingroup$
Nice question! I wish more people thought about their questions before posting.
$endgroup$
– mackycheese21
2 hours ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

It's because$$cos(x-360^circ)=cos(x)text and sin(x-360^circ)=sin(x).$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Usually I don't do this when I get the degree, why is it that in this case I needed to do this?
    $endgroup$
    – user221435
    9 hours ago






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    We don't need to do this, but we usually try to work with angles in the range $[0^circ,360^circ)$.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Great, thank you
    $endgroup$
    – user221435
    9 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @ThomasWeller this is not exactly right. In the case above, the value measured in degrees is an angle, which should always be in the range given. In modelers and animators, the value given is something like angular distance (ie the some of the absolute values of changes in angle over time) which happens to be measured in the same units as angles (degrees, radians), but is not the same type of value. Because of this, applying trigonometric functions to angular distances is not meaningful (without further assumptions)
    $endgroup$
    – DreamConspiracy
    6 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Being very fond of the geometrical plane of complex numbers, I feel that this is backwards (if not formally, then at least intuitively). In my opinion, $sin$ and $cos$ are unchanged after increasing or decreasing an angle by $360^circ$ because turning something $360^circ$ around the origin puts it back where you started. This sounds more like you're saying that turning something $360^circ$ around the origin gives you what you started because $sin$ and $cos$ are unchanged.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    6 hours ago


















3












$begingroup$

The polar form of a complex number is given by a distance from the origin and an angle against the positive real axis ("$x$-axis"). Increasing or decreasing this angle by $360^circ$ will result in the same point. So adding or subtracting multiples of $360^circ$ from the angle component of a set of polar coordinates will not change which point those coordinates represent.



By convention, we usually like this angle to be either in the range $[0^circ, 360^circ)$ or $(-180^circ, 180^circ]$. This is not a requirement by any means (unless explicitly stated in the exercise), but it's easier to tell by a glance what direction from the origin is represented by an angle of $270^circ$ than by $2430^circ$. So there is some merit to keeping the numbers small.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    It is just to get the principal value of the angle, since if you rotate by an angle $466^circ$ you'll get to the same position as rotating $106^circ$ so we usually take the smallest angle that is needed to arrive at the desired position.



    The principal angle is an angle between $-180^circ$ and $+180^circ$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Acomment above shows the range [0∘,360). Curious why the difference.
      $endgroup$
      – JoeTaxpayer
      3 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3202145%2fcomplex-numbers-z-3-4i-polar-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6












    $begingroup$

    It's because$$cos(x-360^circ)=cos(x)text and sin(x-360^circ)=sin(x).$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Usually I don't do this when I get the degree, why is it that in this case I needed to do this?
      $endgroup$
      – user221435
      9 hours ago






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      We don't need to do this, but we usually try to work with angles in the range $[0^circ,360^circ)$.
      $endgroup$
      – José Carlos Santos
      9 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Great, thank you
      $endgroup$
      – user221435
      9 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @ThomasWeller this is not exactly right. In the case above, the value measured in degrees is an angle, which should always be in the range given. In modelers and animators, the value given is something like angular distance (ie the some of the absolute values of changes in angle over time) which happens to be measured in the same units as angles (degrees, radians), but is not the same type of value. Because of this, applying trigonometric functions to angular distances is not meaningful (without further assumptions)
      $endgroup$
      – DreamConspiracy
      6 hours ago







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Being very fond of the geometrical plane of complex numbers, I feel that this is backwards (if not formally, then at least intuitively). In my opinion, $sin$ and $cos$ are unchanged after increasing or decreasing an angle by $360^circ$ because turning something $360^circ$ around the origin puts it back where you started. This sounds more like you're saying that turning something $360^circ$ around the origin gives you what you started because $sin$ and $cos$ are unchanged.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      6 hours ago















    6












    $begingroup$

    It's because$$cos(x-360^circ)=cos(x)text and sin(x-360^circ)=sin(x).$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Usually I don't do this when I get the degree, why is it that in this case I needed to do this?
      $endgroup$
      – user221435
      9 hours ago






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      We don't need to do this, but we usually try to work with angles in the range $[0^circ,360^circ)$.
      $endgroup$
      – José Carlos Santos
      9 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Great, thank you
      $endgroup$
      – user221435
      9 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @ThomasWeller this is not exactly right. In the case above, the value measured in degrees is an angle, which should always be in the range given. In modelers and animators, the value given is something like angular distance (ie the some of the absolute values of changes in angle over time) which happens to be measured in the same units as angles (degrees, radians), but is not the same type of value. Because of this, applying trigonometric functions to angular distances is not meaningful (without further assumptions)
      $endgroup$
      – DreamConspiracy
      6 hours ago







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Being very fond of the geometrical plane of complex numbers, I feel that this is backwards (if not formally, then at least intuitively). In my opinion, $sin$ and $cos$ are unchanged after increasing or decreasing an angle by $360^circ$ because turning something $360^circ$ around the origin puts it back where you started. This sounds more like you're saying that turning something $360^circ$ around the origin gives you what you started because $sin$ and $cos$ are unchanged.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      6 hours ago













    6












    6








    6





    $begingroup$

    It's because$$cos(x-360^circ)=cos(x)text and sin(x-360^circ)=sin(x).$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    It's because$$cos(x-360^circ)=cos(x)text and sin(x-360^circ)=sin(x).$$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 9 hours ago









    José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

    178k24139251




    178k24139251











    • $begingroup$
      Usually I don't do this when I get the degree, why is it that in this case I needed to do this?
      $endgroup$
      – user221435
      9 hours ago






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      We don't need to do this, but we usually try to work with angles in the range $[0^circ,360^circ)$.
      $endgroup$
      – José Carlos Santos
      9 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Great, thank you
      $endgroup$
      – user221435
      9 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @ThomasWeller this is not exactly right. In the case above, the value measured in degrees is an angle, which should always be in the range given. In modelers and animators, the value given is something like angular distance (ie the some of the absolute values of changes in angle over time) which happens to be measured in the same units as angles (degrees, radians), but is not the same type of value. Because of this, applying trigonometric functions to angular distances is not meaningful (without further assumptions)
      $endgroup$
      – DreamConspiracy
      6 hours ago







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Being very fond of the geometrical plane of complex numbers, I feel that this is backwards (if not formally, then at least intuitively). In my opinion, $sin$ and $cos$ are unchanged after increasing or decreasing an angle by $360^circ$ because turning something $360^circ$ around the origin puts it back where you started. This sounds more like you're saying that turning something $360^circ$ around the origin gives you what you started because $sin$ and $cos$ are unchanged.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      6 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      Usually I don't do this when I get the degree, why is it that in this case I needed to do this?
      $endgroup$
      – user221435
      9 hours ago






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      We don't need to do this, but we usually try to work with angles in the range $[0^circ,360^circ)$.
      $endgroup$
      – José Carlos Santos
      9 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Great, thank you
      $endgroup$
      – user221435
      9 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @ThomasWeller this is not exactly right. In the case above, the value measured in degrees is an angle, which should always be in the range given. In modelers and animators, the value given is something like angular distance (ie the some of the absolute values of changes in angle over time) which happens to be measured in the same units as angles (degrees, radians), but is not the same type of value. Because of this, applying trigonometric functions to angular distances is not meaningful (without further assumptions)
      $endgroup$
      – DreamConspiracy
      6 hours ago







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Being very fond of the geometrical plane of complex numbers, I feel that this is backwards (if not formally, then at least intuitively). In my opinion, $sin$ and $cos$ are unchanged after increasing or decreasing an angle by $360^circ$ because turning something $360^circ$ around the origin puts it back where you started. This sounds more like you're saying that turning something $360^circ$ around the origin gives you what you started because $sin$ and $cos$ are unchanged.
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      6 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    Usually I don't do this when I get the degree, why is it that in this case I needed to do this?
    $endgroup$
    – user221435
    9 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Usually I don't do this when I get the degree, why is it that in this case I needed to do this?
    $endgroup$
    – user221435
    9 hours ago




    4




    4




    $begingroup$
    We don't need to do this, but we usually try to work with angles in the range $[0^circ,360^circ)$.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    9 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    We don't need to do this, but we usually try to work with angles in the range $[0^circ,360^circ)$.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    9 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    Great, thank you
    $endgroup$
    – user221435
    9 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Great, thank you
    $endgroup$
    – user221435
    9 hours ago




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    @ThomasWeller this is not exactly right. In the case above, the value measured in degrees is an angle, which should always be in the range given. In modelers and animators, the value given is something like angular distance (ie the some of the absolute values of changes in angle over time) which happens to be measured in the same units as angles (degrees, radians), but is not the same type of value. Because of this, applying trigonometric functions to angular distances is not meaningful (without further assumptions)
    $endgroup$
    – DreamConspiracy
    6 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    @ThomasWeller this is not exactly right. In the case above, the value measured in degrees is an angle, which should always be in the range given. In modelers and animators, the value given is something like angular distance (ie the some of the absolute values of changes in angle over time) which happens to be measured in the same units as angles (degrees, radians), but is not the same type of value. Because of this, applying trigonometric functions to angular distances is not meaningful (without further assumptions)
    $endgroup$
    – DreamConspiracy
    6 hours ago





    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    Being very fond of the geometrical plane of complex numbers, I feel that this is backwards (if not formally, then at least intuitively). In my opinion, $sin$ and $cos$ are unchanged after increasing or decreasing an angle by $360^circ$ because turning something $360^circ$ around the origin puts it back where you started. This sounds more like you're saying that turning something $360^circ$ around the origin gives you what you started because $sin$ and $cos$ are unchanged.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    6 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Being very fond of the geometrical plane of complex numbers, I feel that this is backwards (if not formally, then at least intuitively). In my opinion, $sin$ and $cos$ are unchanged after increasing or decreasing an angle by $360^circ$ because turning something $360^circ$ around the origin puts it back where you started. This sounds more like you're saying that turning something $360^circ$ around the origin gives you what you started because $sin$ and $cos$ are unchanged.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    6 hours ago











    3












    $begingroup$

    The polar form of a complex number is given by a distance from the origin and an angle against the positive real axis ("$x$-axis"). Increasing or decreasing this angle by $360^circ$ will result in the same point. So adding or subtracting multiples of $360^circ$ from the angle component of a set of polar coordinates will not change which point those coordinates represent.



    By convention, we usually like this angle to be either in the range $[0^circ, 360^circ)$ or $(-180^circ, 180^circ]$. This is not a requirement by any means (unless explicitly stated in the exercise), but it's easier to tell by a glance what direction from the origin is represented by an angle of $270^circ$ than by $2430^circ$. So there is some merit to keeping the numbers small.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      The polar form of a complex number is given by a distance from the origin and an angle against the positive real axis ("$x$-axis"). Increasing or decreasing this angle by $360^circ$ will result in the same point. So adding or subtracting multiples of $360^circ$ from the angle component of a set of polar coordinates will not change which point those coordinates represent.



      By convention, we usually like this angle to be either in the range $[0^circ, 360^circ)$ or $(-180^circ, 180^circ]$. This is not a requirement by any means (unless explicitly stated in the exercise), but it's easier to tell by a glance what direction from the origin is represented by an angle of $270^circ$ than by $2430^circ$. So there is some merit to keeping the numbers small.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        The polar form of a complex number is given by a distance from the origin and an angle against the positive real axis ("$x$-axis"). Increasing or decreasing this angle by $360^circ$ will result in the same point. So adding or subtracting multiples of $360^circ$ from the angle component of a set of polar coordinates will not change which point those coordinates represent.



        By convention, we usually like this angle to be either in the range $[0^circ, 360^circ)$ or $(-180^circ, 180^circ]$. This is not a requirement by any means (unless explicitly stated in the exercise), but it's easier to tell by a glance what direction from the origin is represented by an angle of $270^circ$ than by $2430^circ$. So there is some merit to keeping the numbers small.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The polar form of a complex number is given by a distance from the origin and an angle against the positive real axis ("$x$-axis"). Increasing or decreasing this angle by $360^circ$ will result in the same point. So adding or subtracting multiples of $360^circ$ from the angle component of a set of polar coordinates will not change which point those coordinates represent.



        By convention, we usually like this angle to be either in the range $[0^circ, 360^circ)$ or $(-180^circ, 180^circ]$. This is not a requirement by any means (unless explicitly stated in the exercise), but it's easier to tell by a glance what direction from the origin is represented by an angle of $270^circ$ than by $2430^circ$. So there is some merit to keeping the numbers small.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 6 hours ago









        ArthurArthur

        123k7122211




        123k7122211





















            2












            $begingroup$

            It is just to get the principal value of the angle, since if you rotate by an angle $466^circ$ you'll get to the same position as rotating $106^circ$ so we usually take the smallest angle that is needed to arrive at the desired position.



            The principal angle is an angle between $-180^circ$ and $+180^circ$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Acomment above shows the range [0∘,360). Curious why the difference.
              $endgroup$
              – JoeTaxpayer
              3 hours ago















            2












            $begingroup$

            It is just to get the principal value of the angle, since if you rotate by an angle $466^circ$ you'll get to the same position as rotating $106^circ$ so we usually take the smallest angle that is needed to arrive at the desired position.



            The principal angle is an angle between $-180^circ$ and $+180^circ$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Acomment above shows the range [0∘,360). Curious why the difference.
              $endgroup$
              – JoeTaxpayer
              3 hours ago













            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            It is just to get the principal value of the angle, since if you rotate by an angle $466^circ$ you'll get to the same position as rotating $106^circ$ so we usually take the smallest angle that is needed to arrive at the desired position.



            The principal angle is an angle between $-180^circ$ and $+180^circ$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            It is just to get the principal value of the angle, since if you rotate by an angle $466^circ$ you'll get to the same position as rotating $106^circ$ so we usually take the smallest angle that is needed to arrive at the desired position.



            The principal angle is an angle between $-180^circ$ and $+180^circ$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 8 hours ago









            J. W. Tanner

            5,2001520




            5,2001520










            answered 9 hours ago









            Fareed AFFareed AF

            1,025214




            1,025214











            • $begingroup$
              Acomment above shows the range [0∘,360). Curious why the difference.
              $endgroup$
              – JoeTaxpayer
              3 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              Acomment above shows the range [0∘,360). Curious why the difference.
              $endgroup$
              – JoeTaxpayer
              3 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            Acomment above shows the range [0∘,360). Curious why the difference.
            $endgroup$
            – JoeTaxpayer
            3 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Acomment above shows the range [0∘,360). Curious why the difference.
            $endgroup$
            – JoeTaxpayer
            3 hours ago

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3202145%2fcomplex-numbers-z-3-4i-polar-form%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Nidaros erkebispedøme

            Birsay

            Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...