Does the damage from the Absorb Elements spell apply to your next attack, or to your first attack on your next turn?Does Absorb Elements give you resistance to damage from the triggering attack?Does the extra damage from Booming Blade stack if the spell is cast twice on the same target?Is a melee spell attack also a melee attack?Do you still make saving throws for half when benefiting from Absorb Elements?If Wracking Touch applies multiple times on the same attack, does that mean the sneak attack damage is dealt multiple times as well?After using absorb elements, will melee spell attacks grant the extra damage from absorb elements?Does the movement from Infestation count as willing?Does the Absorb Elements spell combine with a sorcerer's Distant Spell metamagic option?Is it possible to stack the damage done by the Absorb Elements spell?If a single attack does multiple types of damage, which type does the Absorb Elements spell give resistance to?
Restricting the options of a lookup field, based on the value of another lookup field?
How to be good at coming up with counter example in Topology
Can a level 2 Warlock take one level in rogue, then continue advancing as a warlock?
Do I need to watch Ant-Man and the Wasp and Captain Marvel before watching Avengers: Endgame?
Co-worker works way more than he should
"The cow" OR "a cow" OR "cows" in this context
Von Neumann Extractor - Which bit is retained?
How to have a sharp product image?
Creating a chemical industry from a medieval tech level without petroleum
How can I practically buy stocks?
My bank got bought out, am I now going to have to start filing tax returns in a different state?
What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?
How can I get rid of an unhelpful parallel branch when unpivoting a single row?
Can I criticise the more senior developers around me for not writing clean code?
What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?
Island of Knights, Knaves and Spies
Find the identical rows in a matrix
Check if a string is entirely made of the same substring
Is there metaphorical meaning of "aus der Haft entlassen"?
Extracting Dirichlet series coefficients
How bug prioritization works in agile projects vs non agile
Prove that the countable union of countable sets is also countable
Mistake in years of experience in resume?
Magical attacks and overcoming damage resistance
Does the damage from the Absorb Elements spell apply to your next attack, or to your first attack on your next turn?
Does Absorb Elements give you resistance to damage from the triggering attack?Does the extra damage from Booming Blade stack if the spell is cast twice on the same target?Is a melee spell attack also a melee attack?Do you still make saving throws for half when benefiting from Absorb Elements?If Wracking Touch applies multiple times on the same attack, does that mean the sneak attack damage is dealt multiple times as well?After using absorb elements, will melee spell attacks grant the extra damage from absorb elements?Does the movement from Infestation count as willing?Does the Absorb Elements spell combine with a sorcerer's Distant Spell metamagic option?Is it possible to stack the damage done by the Absorb Elements spell?If a single attack does multiple types of damage, which type does the Absorb Elements spell give resistance to?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
The description of the absorb elements spell says:
The spell captures some of the incoming energy, lessening its effect
on you and storing it for your next melee attack. [...] Also,
the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the
target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell
ends.
The irst line says "next melee attack". Later, it says "next turn". Which is it?
Let's say I use my movement to jump into a bonfire, use my reaction to cast absorb elements, and use the rest of my movement to get up to the enemy and attack him, all in the same turn. Does my attack have the extra elemental damage?
Does absorb elements apply to your next attack or does it have to be on your next turn?
dnd-5e spells
edited 6 hours ago
V2Blast
27.8k598169
asked 8 hours ago
CadaranCadaran
7372921
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The description of the absorb elements spell says:
The spell captures some of the incoming energy, lessening its effect
on you and storing it for your next melee attack. [...] Also,
the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the
target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell
ends.
The irst line says "next melee attack". Later, it says "next turn". Which is it?
Let's say I use my movement to jump into a bonfire, use my reaction to cast absorb elements, and use the rest of my movement to get up to the enemy and attack him, all in the same turn. Does my attack have the extra elemental damage?
Does absorb elements apply to your next attack or does it have to be on your next turn?
dnd-5e spells
edited 6 hours ago
V2Blast
27.8k598169
asked 8 hours ago
CadaranCadaran
7372921
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The description of the absorb elements spell says:
The spell captures some of the incoming energy, lessening its effect
on you and storing it for your next melee attack. [...] Also,
the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the
target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell
ends.
The irst line says "next melee attack". Later, it says "next turn". Which is it?
Let's say I use my movement to jump into a bonfire, use my reaction to cast absorb elements, and use the rest of my movement to get up to the enemy and attack him, all in the same turn. Does my attack have the extra elemental damage?
Does absorb elements apply to your next attack or does it have to be on your next turn?
dnd-5e spells
edited 6 hours ago
V2Blast
27.8k598169
asked 8 hours ago
CadaranCadaran
7372921
$endgroup$
The description of the absorb elements spell says:
The spell captures some of the incoming energy, lessening its effect
on you and storing it for your next melee attack. [...] Also,
the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the
target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell
ends.
The irst line says "next melee attack". Later, it says "next turn". Which is it?
Let's say I use my movement to jump into a bonfire, use my reaction to cast absorb elements, and use the rest of my movement to get up to the enemy and attack him, all in the same turn. Does my attack have the extra elemental damage?
Does absorb elements apply to your next attack or does it have to be on your next turn?
dnd-5e spells
dnd-5e spells
edited 6 hours ago
V2Blast
27.8k598169
asked 8 hours ago
CadaranCadaran
7372921
edited 6 hours ago
V2Blast
27.8k598169
asked 8 hours ago
CadaranCadaran
7372921
edited 6 hours ago
V2Blast
27.8k598169
edited 6 hours ago
V2Blast
27.8k598169
edited 6 hours ago
V2Blast
27.8k598169
27.8k598169
asked 8 hours ago
CadaranCadaran
7372921
asked 8 hours ago
CadaranCadaran
7372921
asked 8 hours ago
CadaranCadaran
7372921
7372921
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It says both :(
The first sentence of Absorb Elements doesn't have a qualifier
The language in the lead for the spell simply states that the spell is
storing it for your next melee attack
This seems like it should work just fine in your scenario, but it's also in direct contradiction of the third line of the spell
But then it does...
The third line of the spell adds a qualifier that the extra damage gets triggered at the start of your next turn if you make a melee attack.
I've bolded the relevant qualifier in the quote below:
Also, the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell ends.
In this reading with your scenario, you wouldn't be able to use it in the same turn you used your reaction to cast it.
Up to the DM
My unprovable hunch is that the assumption is that you receive your damage when it's not your turn and you generally wouldn't get an attack until your turn. In your scenario, you are triggering this damage yourself by jumping into the bonfire.
Given that, I don't think it would be unreasonable of a DM to allow it's use same turn. You've chosen to expose yourself to damage and burn a resource so that you can deliver some more damage. Just be aware that if you do have a concentration spell going, you'll also have to roll a con save for the fire damage you're giving yourself.
answered 8 hours ago
NautArchNautArch
63k9229416
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
Though I still think that the totally-not-flavor text sets up a bit of a contradiction here. It does look from that first line like it would have some effect on your next attack regardless of when it is (even though there is no effect described later to back that up).
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146849%2fdoes-the-damage-from-the-absorb-elements-spell-apply-to-your-next-attack-or-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It says both :(
The first sentence of Absorb Elements doesn't have a qualifier
The language in the lead for the spell simply states that the spell is
storing it for your next melee attack
This seems like it should work just fine in your scenario, but it's also in direct contradiction of the third line of the spell
But then it does...
The third line of the spell adds a qualifier that the extra damage gets triggered at the start of your next turn if you make a melee attack.
I've bolded the relevant qualifier in the quote below:
Also, the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell ends.
In this reading with your scenario, you wouldn't be able to use it in the same turn you used your reaction to cast it.
Up to the DM
My unprovable hunch is that the assumption is that you receive your damage when it's not your turn and you generally wouldn't get an attack until your turn. In your scenario, you are triggering this damage yourself by jumping into the bonfire.
Given that, I don't think it would be unreasonable of a DM to allow it's use same turn. You've chosen to expose yourself to damage and burn a resource so that you can deliver some more damage. Just be aware that if you do have a concentration spell going, you'll also have to roll a con save for the fire damage you're giving yourself.
answered 8 hours ago
NautArchNautArch
63k9229416
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
Though I still think that the totally-not-flavor text sets up a bit of a contradiction here. It does look from that first line like it would have some effect on your next attack regardless of when it is (even though there is no effect described later to back that up).
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It says both :(
The first sentence of Absorb Elements doesn't have a qualifier
The language in the lead for the spell simply states that the spell is
storing it for your next melee attack
This seems like it should work just fine in your scenario, but it's also in direct contradiction of the third line of the spell
But then it does...
The third line of the spell adds a qualifier that the extra damage gets triggered at the start of your next turn if you make a melee attack.
I've bolded the relevant qualifier in the quote below:
Also, the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell ends.
In this reading with your scenario, you wouldn't be able to use it in the same turn you used your reaction to cast it.
Up to the DM
My unprovable hunch is that the assumption is that you receive your damage when it's not your turn and you generally wouldn't get an attack until your turn. In your scenario, you are triggering this damage yourself by jumping into the bonfire.
Given that, I don't think it would be unreasonable of a DM to allow it's use same turn. You've chosen to expose yourself to damage and burn a resource so that you can deliver some more damage. Just be aware that if you do have a concentration spell going, you'll also have to roll a con save for the fire damage you're giving yourself.
answered 8 hours ago
NautArchNautArch
63k9229416
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
Though I still think that the totally-not-flavor text sets up a bit of a contradiction here. It does look from that first line like it would have some effect on your next attack regardless of when it is (even though there is no effect described later to back that up).
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It says both :(
The first sentence of Absorb Elements doesn't have a qualifier
The language in the lead for the spell simply states that the spell is
storing it for your next melee attack
This seems like it should work just fine in your scenario, but it's also in direct contradiction of the third line of the spell
But then it does...
The third line of the spell adds a qualifier that the extra damage gets triggered at the start of your next turn if you make a melee attack.
I've bolded the relevant qualifier in the quote below:
Also, the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell ends.
In this reading with your scenario, you wouldn't be able to use it in the same turn you used your reaction to cast it.
Up to the DM
My unprovable hunch is that the assumption is that you receive your damage when it's not your turn and you generally wouldn't get an attack until your turn. In your scenario, you are triggering this damage yourself by jumping into the bonfire.
Given that, I don't think it would be unreasonable of a DM to allow it's use same turn. You've chosen to expose yourself to damage and burn a resource so that you can deliver some more damage. Just be aware that if you do have a concentration spell going, you'll also have to roll a con save for the fire damage you're giving yourself.
answered 8 hours ago
NautArchNautArch
63k9229416
$endgroup$
It says both :(
The first sentence of Absorb Elements doesn't have a qualifier
The language in the lead for the spell simply states that the spell is
storing it for your next melee attack
This seems like it should work just fine in your scenario, but it's also in direct contradiction of the third line of the spell
But then it does...
The third line of the spell adds a qualifier that the extra damage gets triggered at the start of your next turn if you make a melee attack.
I've bolded the relevant qualifier in the quote below:
Also, the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell ends.
In this reading with your scenario, you wouldn't be able to use it in the same turn you used your reaction to cast it.
Up to the DM
My unprovable hunch is that the assumption is that you receive your damage when it's not your turn and you generally wouldn't get an attack until your turn. In your scenario, you are triggering this damage yourself by jumping into the bonfire.
Given that, I don't think it would be unreasonable of a DM to allow it's use same turn. You've chosen to expose yourself to damage and burn a resource so that you can deliver some more damage. Just be aware that if you do have a concentration spell going, you'll also have to roll a con save for the fire damage you're giving yourself.
answered 8 hours ago
NautArchNautArch
63k9229416
edited 7 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
NautArchNautArch
63k9229416
answered 8 hours ago
NautArchNautArch
63k9229416
answered 8 hours ago
NautArchNautArch
63k9229416
63k9229416
5
$begingroup$
Though I still think that the totally-not-flavor text sets up a bit of a contradiction here. It does look from that first line like it would have some effect on your next attack regardless of when it is (even though there is no effect described later to back that up).
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
8 hours ago
add a comment |
5
$begingroup$
Though I still think that the totally-not-flavor text sets up a bit of a contradiction here. It does look from that first line like it would have some effect on your next attack regardless of when it is (even though there is no effect described later to back that up).
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
8 hours ago
5
5
$begingroup$
Though I still think that the totally-not-flavor text sets up a bit of a contradiction here. It does look from that first line like it would have some effect on your next attack regardless of when it is (even though there is no effect described later to back that up).
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Though I still think that the totally-not-flavor text sets up a bit of a contradiction here. It does look from that first line like it would have some effect on your next attack regardless of when it is (even though there is no effect described later to back that up).
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146849%2fdoes-the-damage-from-the-absorb-elements-spell-apply-to-your-next-attack-or-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
