How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?How much money can you take into Canada?How much US Cash can I bring into ChileHow much cash can I carry while travelling from India to Poland?How much cash can I carry when travelling to the US?How much cash can you carry on a flight within the European Union?Restrictions on the amount of cash I can carry when entering the US?Bringing cash into the USAHow much money can an Indian tourist carry to LondonHow much cash can we carry to UK and Schengen area from India?how much money can immigrant family carry to USA?

What does "function" actually mean in music?

Does the damage from the Absorb Elements spell apply to your next attack, or to your first attack on your next turn?

How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?

Retract an already submitted recommendation letter (written for an undergrad student)

How can I wire a 9-position switch so that each position turns on one more LED than the one before?

What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator?

Double-nominative constructions and “von”

Mistake in years of experience in resume?

Nails holding drywall

Which big number is bigger?

Find a stone which is not the lightest one

Is there metaphorical meaning of "aus der Haft entlassen"?

Does Mathematica have an implementation of the Poisson binomial distribution?

std::unique_ptr of base class holding reference of derived class does not show warning in gcc compiler while naked pointer shows it. Why?

What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?

Why did C use the -> operator instead of reusing the . operator?

Work requires me to come in early to start computer but wont let me clock in to get paid for it

Can I criticise the more senior developers around me for not writing clean code?

Why do real positive eigenvalues result in an unstable system? What about eigenvalues between 0 and 1? or 1?

How do I produce this symbol: Ϟ in pdfLaTeX?

How long after the last departure shall the airport stay open for an emergency return?

How do I check if a string is entirely made of the same substring?

How to pronounce 'c++' in Spanish

Bayes factor vs P value



How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?


How much money can you take into Canada?How much US Cash can I bring into ChileHow much cash can I carry while travelling from India to Poland?How much cash can I carry when travelling to the US?How much cash can you carry on a flight within the European Union?Restrictions on the amount of cash I can carry when entering the US?Bringing cash into the USAHow much money can an Indian tourist carry to LondonHow much cash can we carry to UK and Schengen area from India?how much money can immigrant family carry to USA?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








22















I'm planning a trip to the USA soon (from Germany). I'd like to know how much cash I can bring in without problems.



Just to clarify, I am not talking about the $10000-or-file-a-form limit. I'm talking about the point where the authorities will assume that with that much cash, I must be a drug dealer (I'm not), and will confiscate my money with little or no hope of my ever seeing it again.



I realize this is an open-ended question, and there is no precise threshhold -- that much depends on the authorities I come in contact with. But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?










share|improve this question



















  • 14





    Just don't bring large quantities of cash. Regardless of civil forfeiture, there's the risk of having it stolen. Use cards instead.

    – David Richerby
    9 hours ago






  • 4





    Any amount can be seized if it is believed to be the proceeds of crime. You are not legally obliged to declare the cash you are carrying if it is under $10,000. If you look like you're involved in drug dealing, or otherwise cause CBP to believe you are a criminal and that the cash you carry is the proceeds of crime, then they may seize it. If you have a valid explanation for it (whatever that may be) and appropriate evidence to back that up, then they will probably not suspect you of anything. The amount of money rarely has anything to do with it, it's the explanation of why you have it.

    – Richard
    8 hours ago






  • 10





    @Harper you're making assumptions that aren't valid. Within the developed world there is a wide spread in the usage of cash vs credit. Germany is a relatively high cash using country (80% of point of sale transactions). While I'd assume someone able to travel across the Atlantic would have access to credit/debit cards, that doesn't mean they normally use them instead of cash for everyday transactions. statista.com/statistics/786680/…

    – Dan Neely
    6 hours ago






  • 4





    @Richard you're being very generous in your faith in law enforcement, as though a valid explanation ever stopped them from stealing the money^W^W^W forfeiting the assets when they wanted to.

    – Rob K
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @DanNeely What's relevant is what other German visitors to the U.S. do, not what Germans do in Germany.

    – Harper
    5 hours ago

















22















I'm planning a trip to the USA soon (from Germany). I'd like to know how much cash I can bring in without problems.



Just to clarify, I am not talking about the $10000-or-file-a-form limit. I'm talking about the point where the authorities will assume that with that much cash, I must be a drug dealer (I'm not), and will confiscate my money with little or no hope of my ever seeing it again.



I realize this is an open-ended question, and there is no precise threshhold -- that much depends on the authorities I come in contact with. But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?










share|improve this question



















  • 14





    Just don't bring large quantities of cash. Regardless of civil forfeiture, there's the risk of having it stolen. Use cards instead.

    – David Richerby
    9 hours ago






  • 4





    Any amount can be seized if it is believed to be the proceeds of crime. You are not legally obliged to declare the cash you are carrying if it is under $10,000. If you look like you're involved in drug dealing, or otherwise cause CBP to believe you are a criminal and that the cash you carry is the proceeds of crime, then they may seize it. If you have a valid explanation for it (whatever that may be) and appropriate evidence to back that up, then they will probably not suspect you of anything. The amount of money rarely has anything to do with it, it's the explanation of why you have it.

    – Richard
    8 hours ago






  • 10





    @Harper you're making assumptions that aren't valid. Within the developed world there is a wide spread in the usage of cash vs credit. Germany is a relatively high cash using country (80% of point of sale transactions). While I'd assume someone able to travel across the Atlantic would have access to credit/debit cards, that doesn't mean they normally use them instead of cash for everyday transactions. statista.com/statistics/786680/…

    – Dan Neely
    6 hours ago






  • 4





    @Richard you're being very generous in your faith in law enforcement, as though a valid explanation ever stopped them from stealing the money^W^W^W forfeiting the assets when they wanted to.

    – Rob K
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @DanNeely What's relevant is what other German visitors to the U.S. do, not what Germans do in Germany.

    – Harper
    5 hours ago













22












22








22


1






I'm planning a trip to the USA soon (from Germany). I'd like to know how much cash I can bring in without problems.



Just to clarify, I am not talking about the $10000-or-file-a-form limit. I'm talking about the point where the authorities will assume that with that much cash, I must be a drug dealer (I'm not), and will confiscate my money with little or no hope of my ever seeing it again.



I realize this is an open-ended question, and there is no precise threshhold -- that much depends on the authorities I come in contact with. But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?










share|improve this question
















I'm planning a trip to the USA soon (from Germany). I'd like to know how much cash I can bring in without problems.



Just to clarify, I am not talking about the $10000-or-file-a-form limit. I'm talking about the point where the authorities will assume that with that much cash, I must be a drug dealer (I'm not), and will confiscate my money with little or no hope of my ever seeing it again.



I realize this is an open-ended question, and there is no precise threshhold -- that much depends on the authorities I come in contact with. But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?







usa customs-and-immigration international-travel money






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 9 hours ago









David Richerby

14.9k94790




14.9k94790










asked 9 hours ago









JenniferJennifer

38038




38038







  • 14





    Just don't bring large quantities of cash. Regardless of civil forfeiture, there's the risk of having it stolen. Use cards instead.

    – David Richerby
    9 hours ago






  • 4





    Any amount can be seized if it is believed to be the proceeds of crime. You are not legally obliged to declare the cash you are carrying if it is under $10,000. If you look like you're involved in drug dealing, or otherwise cause CBP to believe you are a criminal and that the cash you carry is the proceeds of crime, then they may seize it. If you have a valid explanation for it (whatever that may be) and appropriate evidence to back that up, then they will probably not suspect you of anything. The amount of money rarely has anything to do with it, it's the explanation of why you have it.

    – Richard
    8 hours ago






  • 10





    @Harper you're making assumptions that aren't valid. Within the developed world there is a wide spread in the usage of cash vs credit. Germany is a relatively high cash using country (80% of point of sale transactions). While I'd assume someone able to travel across the Atlantic would have access to credit/debit cards, that doesn't mean they normally use them instead of cash for everyday transactions. statista.com/statistics/786680/…

    – Dan Neely
    6 hours ago






  • 4





    @Richard you're being very generous in your faith in law enforcement, as though a valid explanation ever stopped them from stealing the money^W^W^W forfeiting the assets when they wanted to.

    – Rob K
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @DanNeely What's relevant is what other German visitors to the U.S. do, not what Germans do in Germany.

    – Harper
    5 hours ago












  • 14





    Just don't bring large quantities of cash. Regardless of civil forfeiture, there's the risk of having it stolen. Use cards instead.

    – David Richerby
    9 hours ago






  • 4





    Any amount can be seized if it is believed to be the proceeds of crime. You are not legally obliged to declare the cash you are carrying if it is under $10,000. If you look like you're involved in drug dealing, or otherwise cause CBP to believe you are a criminal and that the cash you carry is the proceeds of crime, then they may seize it. If you have a valid explanation for it (whatever that may be) and appropriate evidence to back that up, then they will probably not suspect you of anything. The amount of money rarely has anything to do with it, it's the explanation of why you have it.

    – Richard
    8 hours ago






  • 10





    @Harper you're making assumptions that aren't valid. Within the developed world there is a wide spread in the usage of cash vs credit. Germany is a relatively high cash using country (80% of point of sale transactions). While I'd assume someone able to travel across the Atlantic would have access to credit/debit cards, that doesn't mean they normally use them instead of cash for everyday transactions. statista.com/statistics/786680/…

    – Dan Neely
    6 hours ago






  • 4





    @Richard you're being very generous in your faith in law enforcement, as though a valid explanation ever stopped them from stealing the money^W^W^W forfeiting the assets when they wanted to.

    – Rob K
    6 hours ago






  • 3





    @DanNeely What's relevant is what other German visitors to the U.S. do, not what Germans do in Germany.

    – Harper
    5 hours ago







14




14





Just don't bring large quantities of cash. Regardless of civil forfeiture, there's the risk of having it stolen. Use cards instead.

– David Richerby
9 hours ago





Just don't bring large quantities of cash. Regardless of civil forfeiture, there's the risk of having it stolen. Use cards instead.

– David Richerby
9 hours ago




4




4





Any amount can be seized if it is believed to be the proceeds of crime. You are not legally obliged to declare the cash you are carrying if it is under $10,000. If you look like you're involved in drug dealing, or otherwise cause CBP to believe you are a criminal and that the cash you carry is the proceeds of crime, then they may seize it. If you have a valid explanation for it (whatever that may be) and appropriate evidence to back that up, then they will probably not suspect you of anything. The amount of money rarely has anything to do with it, it's the explanation of why you have it.

– Richard
8 hours ago





Any amount can be seized if it is believed to be the proceeds of crime. You are not legally obliged to declare the cash you are carrying if it is under $10,000. If you look like you're involved in drug dealing, or otherwise cause CBP to believe you are a criminal and that the cash you carry is the proceeds of crime, then they may seize it. If you have a valid explanation for it (whatever that may be) and appropriate evidence to back that up, then they will probably not suspect you of anything. The amount of money rarely has anything to do with it, it's the explanation of why you have it.

– Richard
8 hours ago




10




10





@Harper you're making assumptions that aren't valid. Within the developed world there is a wide spread in the usage of cash vs credit. Germany is a relatively high cash using country (80% of point of sale transactions). While I'd assume someone able to travel across the Atlantic would have access to credit/debit cards, that doesn't mean they normally use them instead of cash for everyday transactions. statista.com/statistics/786680/…

– Dan Neely
6 hours ago





@Harper you're making assumptions that aren't valid. Within the developed world there is a wide spread in the usage of cash vs credit. Germany is a relatively high cash using country (80% of point of sale transactions). While I'd assume someone able to travel across the Atlantic would have access to credit/debit cards, that doesn't mean they normally use them instead of cash for everyday transactions. statista.com/statistics/786680/…

– Dan Neely
6 hours ago




4




4





@Richard you're being very generous in your faith in law enforcement, as though a valid explanation ever stopped them from stealing the money^W^W^W forfeiting the assets when they wanted to.

– Rob K
6 hours ago





@Richard you're being very generous in your faith in law enforcement, as though a valid explanation ever stopped them from stealing the money^W^W^W forfeiting the assets when they wanted to.

– Rob K
6 hours ago




3




3





@DanNeely What's relevant is what other German visitors to the U.S. do, not what Germans do in Germany.

– Harper
5 hours ago





@DanNeely What's relevant is what other German visitors to the U.S. do, not what Germans do in Germany.

– Harper
5 hours ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















24














It's worse than that. It casts shade on the purpose for your visit, risking a refusal.



You're a citizen of an advanced country that has a state-of-the-art banking system, competent and uncorrupted law enforcement, and is a member of G8 and all the relevant banking treaties. Not every German travels to the US, only certain ones: and the ones who visit for (your visit purpose here) tend to reside in a certain socioeconomic class. The vast majority of them simply use that banking system in the normal way. Which makes you a "high nail": a standout.



So this raises questions about you. Aside from the question of civil forfeiture, it raises the question of whether you should be admitted in the first place.



You would first, need a darned good reason for wanting to do this, that jibes with your story, believable documents, and allowable purposes for visiting the U.S. And second, have that reason be one that sounds perfectly reasonable to US CBP.



Remember how immigration control works. They make a presumption of immigrant intent: if you refuse to defend yourself, they presume your intent is immigration. That is reasonable, since their mission is controlling immigration by stopping immigrants, and only allowing in people who are short-term travelers. Then, they allow you to present your story and facts (documents) to prove yourself not an immigrant.



Your main weapon in rebutting immigrant intent is to show ties at home. One of the "ties" they like to see is an active, regular banking life. Having a pile of cash suggests the very opposite: a person who is "unbanked"*. Such people tend to overstay their original promise, get in trouble, seek social services or employment, or even resort to crime. Also, they tend to be poorly rooted back home, and that introduces the risk of them immigrating.



So the pile of cash will "light up" questions like this about your visit. Aside from having a reasonable reason for the cash pile, you should be well prepared to document your home ties back in Germany. Owning a home, being politically active, having a well-developed career that doesn't lend itself to telecommuting, that kind of thing.



You'd be sorting all this out with immigration control (CBP) right there at the immigration desk at JFK Airport, and if they refuse you, you'd cross an ocean twice for nothing. Here are two ways to dodge that.



  • Don't rely on VWP; apply for a visa. Let CBP work out their concerns in advance.

  • Book via Dublin or Shannon. Those airports have CBP Preclearance, which means the CBP desk is right there. If they refuse you, you can grab your bags, leave the airport, and head to the nearest pub to drown your sorrows in a 425ml Guinness.


* Unbanked: A concept we are VERY familiar with here in the US, and often taken as a bad sign. Again, within the demographic of ordinary travelers, this either means a very unusual philosophy on money, or (will be presumed to be) inability to bank, due to a blacklist arising from bouncing checks and not covering it, presumably because of not having the money.






share|improve this answer

























  • This answer's accuracy may change after brexit.

    – Mindwin
    2 hours ago







  • 1





    @Mindwin Interesting idea, I don't doubt it, but I'm dying to know why... since the UK is not involved. Might it change the US CBP rules at Shannon or Dublin? Make it difficult to bring the cash into Ireland?

    – Harper
    2 hours ago







  • 1





    I've heard "unbanked" used generally to refer to anyone without a bank account, including those who idiosyncratically don't want one, can't/won't pay associated fees, etc., as well as those who are barred from banks. But I'm not an expert-- have I been hearing the term used in nonstandard ways?

    – Upper_Case
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    @Upper_Case That sounds reasonable in general. Though I usually hear it as regards to those who have been made unbanked; typically unjustly owing to a ChexSystems ban or some sort of state restriction. However, here we are in the context of an immigration interview, so what's relevant is their perceptions (and hence, a US prejudice).

    – Harper
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    This doesn't answer the question. How much is a "pile of cash" that will be suspicious? Ten grand? Five hundred dollars? Any cash at all? That's what OP is asking.

    – Kat
    1 hour ago


















14















I realize this is an open-ended question, and there is no precise threshhold -- that much depends on the authorities I come in contact with. But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?




Your question cannot be answered, as the way you've asked it implies. Because there is no precise threshold, and because it depends on specifically which authorities you encounter, there is no effective boundary.



All we can tell you is that if you carry enough cash to have to declare it, and you do declare it, you're guaranteed to encounter CBP. CBP does not share the policy that some municipal police forces have of abusing civil asset forfeiture to acquire resources for the department, so filing the form probably does not increase your risk very much.



If you fail to declare your cash despite exceeding the limit, then there is a chance you won't encounter any authorities over the cash, but if you do encounter CBP in a spot check, you're pretty much guaranteed to lose the cash.






share|improve this answer























  • I think Jennifer made it clear that she will be under the $10,000 limit.

    – TonyK
    1 hour ago



















4














First off, let's differentiate the two Civil Asset Forfeitures(CAFs):



  • Police - This tends to be focused on people committing (or merely suspected of committing) smaller crimes (i.e you had illegal drugs on you) and having assets seized. The US Supreme Court recently limited actions like this, but they still occur with some frequency. Most of the CAF examples you find via searches are of this type.

  • CBP - These tend to be aimed at people believed to be actively doing something like smuggling, laundering money, etc.

The CBP doesn't seem to do this as often, but that's probably because there's a lot more police and people in the general population than go through customs. The largest customs case of CAF centers around an Albanian man who tried to fly with undeclared cash. CBP miscounted the cash and then seized it under a variety of laws aimed at money laundering.



But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?



The main thing is you don't need to stand out to where they decide to inquire about why you have a lot of cash. CBP might just check your documents and let you through. If you like to smoke marijuana or do drugs, I would make sure I refrained from that for some time before and during your trip, lest a CBP dog indicate you, or your baggage, smell like drugs.



I would also get a visa. You might not need one for your visit, but it's far less likely that someone who has gone through that hassle for a simple visit is trying to launder money.



I know you're aware, but it bears repeating that if you want to bring more than $10,000 in cash, be sure to declare it because the CBP website directly states




Failure to declare currency in amounts more than $10,000 can result in its seizure.




There's a large chance they will use CAF to seize it if you're caught like this.






share|improve this answer






























    1














    There is no such thing as a lower bound. Civil forfeiture laws and practices vary greatly from state to state. See, for example, https://ij.org/report/policing-for-profit/grading-state-federal-civil-forfeiture-laws/



    It is certainly a rather unfair and frustrating practice of law enforcement, but on the other hand, it's not common either and the chance of you are encountering such a situation as a tourist a quite small.



    The best protection is to carry no or little cash. Credit and debit cards are widely accepted and if you really need cash for anything, you can get it easily at the nearest ATM. Cash is used less and less: For example the food truck outside of Boston South station where you buy your morning coffee doesn't accept cash at all: plastic only. I sometimes go months without using cash.






    share|improve this answer






























      -1














      There is no safe limit regarding civil asset forfeiture: the bulk of the confiscated cash is small amounts not warranting the hassle of a contest. Basically try to be white and reasonably well-dressed (like a large-scale drug dealer would be) and you'll not likely be bothered. The problem with actually declaring large amounts of cash is that this information will immediately be passed on to DHS or local law enforcement agents which will likely pick on you "by chance" when you leave the airport premises.



      So basically don't bring large amounts of cash into the U.S., whether declared or not, if you don't want them to get stolen by U.S. "law" enforcement. Particularly not if you don't have the kind of race/standing/backup to look like a lot of trouble.






      share|improve this answer























      • 'The problem with actually declaring large amounts of cash is that this information will immediately be passed on to DHS or local law enforcement agents which will likely pick on you "by chance" when you leave the airport premises.' [Citation needed]

        – David Richerby
        20 mins ago











      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "273"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137298%2fhow-much-cash-can-i-safely-carry-into-the-usa-and-avoid-civil-forfeiture%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      24














      It's worse than that. It casts shade on the purpose for your visit, risking a refusal.



      You're a citizen of an advanced country that has a state-of-the-art banking system, competent and uncorrupted law enforcement, and is a member of G8 and all the relevant banking treaties. Not every German travels to the US, only certain ones: and the ones who visit for (your visit purpose here) tend to reside in a certain socioeconomic class. The vast majority of them simply use that banking system in the normal way. Which makes you a "high nail": a standout.



      So this raises questions about you. Aside from the question of civil forfeiture, it raises the question of whether you should be admitted in the first place.



      You would first, need a darned good reason for wanting to do this, that jibes with your story, believable documents, and allowable purposes for visiting the U.S. And second, have that reason be one that sounds perfectly reasonable to US CBP.



      Remember how immigration control works. They make a presumption of immigrant intent: if you refuse to defend yourself, they presume your intent is immigration. That is reasonable, since their mission is controlling immigration by stopping immigrants, and only allowing in people who are short-term travelers. Then, they allow you to present your story and facts (documents) to prove yourself not an immigrant.



      Your main weapon in rebutting immigrant intent is to show ties at home. One of the "ties" they like to see is an active, regular banking life. Having a pile of cash suggests the very opposite: a person who is "unbanked"*. Such people tend to overstay their original promise, get in trouble, seek social services or employment, or even resort to crime. Also, they tend to be poorly rooted back home, and that introduces the risk of them immigrating.



      So the pile of cash will "light up" questions like this about your visit. Aside from having a reasonable reason for the cash pile, you should be well prepared to document your home ties back in Germany. Owning a home, being politically active, having a well-developed career that doesn't lend itself to telecommuting, that kind of thing.



      You'd be sorting all this out with immigration control (CBP) right there at the immigration desk at JFK Airport, and if they refuse you, you'd cross an ocean twice for nothing. Here are two ways to dodge that.



      • Don't rely on VWP; apply for a visa. Let CBP work out their concerns in advance.

      • Book via Dublin or Shannon. Those airports have CBP Preclearance, which means the CBP desk is right there. If they refuse you, you can grab your bags, leave the airport, and head to the nearest pub to drown your sorrows in a 425ml Guinness.


      * Unbanked: A concept we are VERY familiar with here in the US, and often taken as a bad sign. Again, within the demographic of ordinary travelers, this either means a very unusual philosophy on money, or (will be presumed to be) inability to bank, due to a blacklist arising from bouncing checks and not covering it, presumably because of not having the money.






      share|improve this answer

























      • This answer's accuracy may change after brexit.

        – Mindwin
        2 hours ago







      • 1





        @Mindwin Interesting idea, I don't doubt it, but I'm dying to know why... since the UK is not involved. Might it change the US CBP rules at Shannon or Dublin? Make it difficult to bring the cash into Ireland?

        – Harper
        2 hours ago







      • 1





        I've heard "unbanked" used generally to refer to anyone without a bank account, including those who idiosyncratically don't want one, can't/won't pay associated fees, etc., as well as those who are barred from banks. But I'm not an expert-- have I been hearing the term used in nonstandard ways?

        – Upper_Case
        2 hours ago






      • 1





        @Upper_Case That sounds reasonable in general. Though I usually hear it as regards to those who have been made unbanked; typically unjustly owing to a ChexSystems ban or some sort of state restriction. However, here we are in the context of an immigration interview, so what's relevant is their perceptions (and hence, a US prejudice).

        – Harper
        1 hour ago






      • 1





        This doesn't answer the question. How much is a "pile of cash" that will be suspicious? Ten grand? Five hundred dollars? Any cash at all? That's what OP is asking.

        – Kat
        1 hour ago















      24














      It's worse than that. It casts shade on the purpose for your visit, risking a refusal.



      You're a citizen of an advanced country that has a state-of-the-art banking system, competent and uncorrupted law enforcement, and is a member of G8 and all the relevant banking treaties. Not every German travels to the US, only certain ones: and the ones who visit for (your visit purpose here) tend to reside in a certain socioeconomic class. The vast majority of them simply use that banking system in the normal way. Which makes you a "high nail": a standout.



      So this raises questions about you. Aside from the question of civil forfeiture, it raises the question of whether you should be admitted in the first place.



      You would first, need a darned good reason for wanting to do this, that jibes with your story, believable documents, and allowable purposes for visiting the U.S. And second, have that reason be one that sounds perfectly reasonable to US CBP.



      Remember how immigration control works. They make a presumption of immigrant intent: if you refuse to defend yourself, they presume your intent is immigration. That is reasonable, since their mission is controlling immigration by stopping immigrants, and only allowing in people who are short-term travelers. Then, they allow you to present your story and facts (documents) to prove yourself not an immigrant.



      Your main weapon in rebutting immigrant intent is to show ties at home. One of the "ties" they like to see is an active, regular banking life. Having a pile of cash suggests the very opposite: a person who is "unbanked"*. Such people tend to overstay their original promise, get in trouble, seek social services or employment, or even resort to crime. Also, they tend to be poorly rooted back home, and that introduces the risk of them immigrating.



      So the pile of cash will "light up" questions like this about your visit. Aside from having a reasonable reason for the cash pile, you should be well prepared to document your home ties back in Germany. Owning a home, being politically active, having a well-developed career that doesn't lend itself to telecommuting, that kind of thing.



      You'd be sorting all this out with immigration control (CBP) right there at the immigration desk at JFK Airport, and if they refuse you, you'd cross an ocean twice for nothing. Here are two ways to dodge that.



      • Don't rely on VWP; apply for a visa. Let CBP work out their concerns in advance.

      • Book via Dublin or Shannon. Those airports have CBP Preclearance, which means the CBP desk is right there. If they refuse you, you can grab your bags, leave the airport, and head to the nearest pub to drown your sorrows in a 425ml Guinness.


      * Unbanked: A concept we are VERY familiar with here in the US, and often taken as a bad sign. Again, within the demographic of ordinary travelers, this either means a very unusual philosophy on money, or (will be presumed to be) inability to bank, due to a blacklist arising from bouncing checks and not covering it, presumably because of not having the money.






      share|improve this answer

























      • This answer's accuracy may change after brexit.

        – Mindwin
        2 hours ago







      • 1





        @Mindwin Interesting idea, I don't doubt it, but I'm dying to know why... since the UK is not involved. Might it change the US CBP rules at Shannon or Dublin? Make it difficult to bring the cash into Ireland?

        – Harper
        2 hours ago







      • 1





        I've heard "unbanked" used generally to refer to anyone without a bank account, including those who idiosyncratically don't want one, can't/won't pay associated fees, etc., as well as those who are barred from banks. But I'm not an expert-- have I been hearing the term used in nonstandard ways?

        – Upper_Case
        2 hours ago






      • 1





        @Upper_Case That sounds reasonable in general. Though I usually hear it as regards to those who have been made unbanked; typically unjustly owing to a ChexSystems ban or some sort of state restriction. However, here we are in the context of an immigration interview, so what's relevant is their perceptions (and hence, a US prejudice).

        – Harper
        1 hour ago






      • 1





        This doesn't answer the question. How much is a "pile of cash" that will be suspicious? Ten grand? Five hundred dollars? Any cash at all? That's what OP is asking.

        – Kat
        1 hour ago













      24












      24








      24







      It's worse than that. It casts shade on the purpose for your visit, risking a refusal.



      You're a citizen of an advanced country that has a state-of-the-art banking system, competent and uncorrupted law enforcement, and is a member of G8 and all the relevant banking treaties. Not every German travels to the US, only certain ones: and the ones who visit for (your visit purpose here) tend to reside in a certain socioeconomic class. The vast majority of them simply use that banking system in the normal way. Which makes you a "high nail": a standout.



      So this raises questions about you. Aside from the question of civil forfeiture, it raises the question of whether you should be admitted in the first place.



      You would first, need a darned good reason for wanting to do this, that jibes with your story, believable documents, and allowable purposes for visiting the U.S. And second, have that reason be one that sounds perfectly reasonable to US CBP.



      Remember how immigration control works. They make a presumption of immigrant intent: if you refuse to defend yourself, they presume your intent is immigration. That is reasonable, since their mission is controlling immigration by stopping immigrants, and only allowing in people who are short-term travelers. Then, they allow you to present your story and facts (documents) to prove yourself not an immigrant.



      Your main weapon in rebutting immigrant intent is to show ties at home. One of the "ties" they like to see is an active, regular banking life. Having a pile of cash suggests the very opposite: a person who is "unbanked"*. Such people tend to overstay their original promise, get in trouble, seek social services or employment, or even resort to crime. Also, they tend to be poorly rooted back home, and that introduces the risk of them immigrating.



      So the pile of cash will "light up" questions like this about your visit. Aside from having a reasonable reason for the cash pile, you should be well prepared to document your home ties back in Germany. Owning a home, being politically active, having a well-developed career that doesn't lend itself to telecommuting, that kind of thing.



      You'd be sorting all this out with immigration control (CBP) right there at the immigration desk at JFK Airport, and if they refuse you, you'd cross an ocean twice for nothing. Here are two ways to dodge that.



      • Don't rely on VWP; apply for a visa. Let CBP work out their concerns in advance.

      • Book via Dublin or Shannon. Those airports have CBP Preclearance, which means the CBP desk is right there. If they refuse you, you can grab your bags, leave the airport, and head to the nearest pub to drown your sorrows in a 425ml Guinness.


      * Unbanked: A concept we are VERY familiar with here in the US, and often taken as a bad sign. Again, within the demographic of ordinary travelers, this either means a very unusual philosophy on money, or (will be presumed to be) inability to bank, due to a blacklist arising from bouncing checks and not covering it, presumably because of not having the money.






      share|improve this answer















      It's worse than that. It casts shade on the purpose for your visit, risking a refusal.



      You're a citizen of an advanced country that has a state-of-the-art banking system, competent and uncorrupted law enforcement, and is a member of G8 and all the relevant banking treaties. Not every German travels to the US, only certain ones: and the ones who visit for (your visit purpose here) tend to reside in a certain socioeconomic class. The vast majority of them simply use that banking system in the normal way. Which makes you a "high nail": a standout.



      So this raises questions about you. Aside from the question of civil forfeiture, it raises the question of whether you should be admitted in the first place.



      You would first, need a darned good reason for wanting to do this, that jibes with your story, believable documents, and allowable purposes for visiting the U.S. And second, have that reason be one that sounds perfectly reasonable to US CBP.



      Remember how immigration control works. They make a presumption of immigrant intent: if you refuse to defend yourself, they presume your intent is immigration. That is reasonable, since their mission is controlling immigration by stopping immigrants, and only allowing in people who are short-term travelers. Then, they allow you to present your story and facts (documents) to prove yourself not an immigrant.



      Your main weapon in rebutting immigrant intent is to show ties at home. One of the "ties" they like to see is an active, regular banking life. Having a pile of cash suggests the very opposite: a person who is "unbanked"*. Such people tend to overstay their original promise, get in trouble, seek social services or employment, or even resort to crime. Also, they tend to be poorly rooted back home, and that introduces the risk of them immigrating.



      So the pile of cash will "light up" questions like this about your visit. Aside from having a reasonable reason for the cash pile, you should be well prepared to document your home ties back in Germany. Owning a home, being politically active, having a well-developed career that doesn't lend itself to telecommuting, that kind of thing.



      You'd be sorting all this out with immigration control (CBP) right there at the immigration desk at JFK Airport, and if they refuse you, you'd cross an ocean twice for nothing. Here are two ways to dodge that.



      • Don't rely on VWP; apply for a visa. Let CBP work out their concerns in advance.

      • Book via Dublin or Shannon. Those airports have CBP Preclearance, which means the CBP desk is right there. If they refuse you, you can grab your bags, leave the airport, and head to the nearest pub to drown your sorrows in a 425ml Guinness.


      * Unbanked: A concept we are VERY familiar with here in the US, and often taken as a bad sign. Again, within the demographic of ordinary travelers, this either means a very unusual philosophy on money, or (will be presumed to be) inability to bank, due to a blacklist arising from bouncing checks and not covering it, presumably because of not having the money.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 2 hours ago

























      answered 5 hours ago









      HarperHarper

      12.9k32363




      12.9k32363












      • This answer's accuracy may change after brexit.

        – Mindwin
        2 hours ago







      • 1





        @Mindwin Interesting idea, I don't doubt it, but I'm dying to know why... since the UK is not involved. Might it change the US CBP rules at Shannon or Dublin? Make it difficult to bring the cash into Ireland?

        – Harper
        2 hours ago







      • 1





        I've heard "unbanked" used generally to refer to anyone without a bank account, including those who idiosyncratically don't want one, can't/won't pay associated fees, etc., as well as those who are barred from banks. But I'm not an expert-- have I been hearing the term used in nonstandard ways?

        – Upper_Case
        2 hours ago






      • 1





        @Upper_Case That sounds reasonable in general. Though I usually hear it as regards to those who have been made unbanked; typically unjustly owing to a ChexSystems ban or some sort of state restriction. However, here we are in the context of an immigration interview, so what's relevant is their perceptions (and hence, a US prejudice).

        – Harper
        1 hour ago






      • 1





        This doesn't answer the question. How much is a "pile of cash" that will be suspicious? Ten grand? Five hundred dollars? Any cash at all? That's what OP is asking.

        – Kat
        1 hour ago

















      • This answer's accuracy may change after brexit.

        – Mindwin
        2 hours ago







      • 1





        @Mindwin Interesting idea, I don't doubt it, but I'm dying to know why... since the UK is not involved. Might it change the US CBP rules at Shannon or Dublin? Make it difficult to bring the cash into Ireland?

        – Harper
        2 hours ago







      • 1





        I've heard "unbanked" used generally to refer to anyone without a bank account, including those who idiosyncratically don't want one, can't/won't pay associated fees, etc., as well as those who are barred from banks. But I'm not an expert-- have I been hearing the term used in nonstandard ways?

        – Upper_Case
        2 hours ago






      • 1





        @Upper_Case That sounds reasonable in general. Though I usually hear it as regards to those who have been made unbanked; typically unjustly owing to a ChexSystems ban or some sort of state restriction. However, here we are in the context of an immigration interview, so what's relevant is their perceptions (and hence, a US prejudice).

        – Harper
        1 hour ago






      • 1





        This doesn't answer the question. How much is a "pile of cash" that will be suspicious? Ten grand? Five hundred dollars? Any cash at all? That's what OP is asking.

        – Kat
        1 hour ago
















      This answer's accuracy may change after brexit.

      – Mindwin
      2 hours ago






      This answer's accuracy may change after brexit.

      – Mindwin
      2 hours ago





      1




      1





      @Mindwin Interesting idea, I don't doubt it, but I'm dying to know why... since the UK is not involved. Might it change the US CBP rules at Shannon or Dublin? Make it difficult to bring the cash into Ireland?

      – Harper
      2 hours ago






      @Mindwin Interesting idea, I don't doubt it, but I'm dying to know why... since the UK is not involved. Might it change the US CBP rules at Shannon or Dublin? Make it difficult to bring the cash into Ireland?

      – Harper
      2 hours ago





      1




      1





      I've heard "unbanked" used generally to refer to anyone without a bank account, including those who idiosyncratically don't want one, can't/won't pay associated fees, etc., as well as those who are barred from banks. But I'm not an expert-- have I been hearing the term used in nonstandard ways?

      – Upper_Case
      2 hours ago





      I've heard "unbanked" used generally to refer to anyone without a bank account, including those who idiosyncratically don't want one, can't/won't pay associated fees, etc., as well as those who are barred from banks. But I'm not an expert-- have I been hearing the term used in nonstandard ways?

      – Upper_Case
      2 hours ago




      1




      1





      @Upper_Case That sounds reasonable in general. Though I usually hear it as regards to those who have been made unbanked; typically unjustly owing to a ChexSystems ban or some sort of state restriction. However, here we are in the context of an immigration interview, so what's relevant is their perceptions (and hence, a US prejudice).

      – Harper
      1 hour ago





      @Upper_Case That sounds reasonable in general. Though I usually hear it as regards to those who have been made unbanked; typically unjustly owing to a ChexSystems ban or some sort of state restriction. However, here we are in the context of an immigration interview, so what's relevant is their perceptions (and hence, a US prejudice).

      – Harper
      1 hour ago




      1




      1





      This doesn't answer the question. How much is a "pile of cash" that will be suspicious? Ten grand? Five hundred dollars? Any cash at all? That's what OP is asking.

      – Kat
      1 hour ago





      This doesn't answer the question. How much is a "pile of cash" that will be suspicious? Ten grand? Five hundred dollars? Any cash at all? That's what OP is asking.

      – Kat
      1 hour ago













      14















      I realize this is an open-ended question, and there is no precise threshhold -- that much depends on the authorities I come in contact with. But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?




      Your question cannot be answered, as the way you've asked it implies. Because there is no precise threshold, and because it depends on specifically which authorities you encounter, there is no effective boundary.



      All we can tell you is that if you carry enough cash to have to declare it, and you do declare it, you're guaranteed to encounter CBP. CBP does not share the policy that some municipal police forces have of abusing civil asset forfeiture to acquire resources for the department, so filing the form probably does not increase your risk very much.



      If you fail to declare your cash despite exceeding the limit, then there is a chance you won't encounter any authorities over the cash, but if you do encounter CBP in a spot check, you're pretty much guaranteed to lose the cash.






      share|improve this answer























      • I think Jennifer made it clear that she will be under the $10,000 limit.

        – TonyK
        1 hour ago
















      14















      I realize this is an open-ended question, and there is no precise threshhold -- that much depends on the authorities I come in contact with. But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?




      Your question cannot be answered, as the way you've asked it implies. Because there is no precise threshold, and because it depends on specifically which authorities you encounter, there is no effective boundary.



      All we can tell you is that if you carry enough cash to have to declare it, and you do declare it, you're guaranteed to encounter CBP. CBP does not share the policy that some municipal police forces have of abusing civil asset forfeiture to acquire resources for the department, so filing the form probably does not increase your risk very much.



      If you fail to declare your cash despite exceeding the limit, then there is a chance you won't encounter any authorities over the cash, but if you do encounter CBP in a spot check, you're pretty much guaranteed to lose the cash.






      share|improve this answer























      • I think Jennifer made it clear that she will be under the $10,000 limit.

        – TonyK
        1 hour ago














      14












      14








      14








      I realize this is an open-ended question, and there is no precise threshhold -- that much depends on the authorities I come in contact with. But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?




      Your question cannot be answered, as the way you've asked it implies. Because there is no precise threshold, and because it depends on specifically which authorities you encounter, there is no effective boundary.



      All we can tell you is that if you carry enough cash to have to declare it, and you do declare it, you're guaranteed to encounter CBP. CBP does not share the policy that some municipal police forces have of abusing civil asset forfeiture to acquire resources for the department, so filing the form probably does not increase your risk very much.



      If you fail to declare your cash despite exceeding the limit, then there is a chance you won't encounter any authorities over the cash, but if you do encounter CBP in a spot check, you're pretty much guaranteed to lose the cash.






      share|improve this answer














      I realize this is an open-ended question, and there is no precise threshhold -- that much depends on the authorities I come in contact with. But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?




      Your question cannot be answered, as the way you've asked it implies. Because there is no precise threshold, and because it depends on specifically which authorities you encounter, there is no effective boundary.



      All we can tell you is that if you carry enough cash to have to declare it, and you do declare it, you're guaranteed to encounter CBP. CBP does not share the policy that some municipal police forces have of abusing civil asset forfeiture to acquire resources for the department, so filing the form probably does not increase your risk very much.



      If you fail to declare your cash despite exceeding the limit, then there is a chance you won't encounter any authorities over the cash, but if you do encounter CBP in a spot check, you're pretty much guaranteed to lose the cash.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 8 hours ago









      phoogphoog

      77.9k13170253




      77.9k13170253












      • I think Jennifer made it clear that she will be under the $10,000 limit.

        – TonyK
        1 hour ago


















      • I think Jennifer made it clear that she will be under the $10,000 limit.

        – TonyK
        1 hour ago

















      I think Jennifer made it clear that she will be under the $10,000 limit.

      – TonyK
      1 hour ago






      I think Jennifer made it clear that she will be under the $10,000 limit.

      – TonyK
      1 hour ago












      4














      First off, let's differentiate the two Civil Asset Forfeitures(CAFs):



      • Police - This tends to be focused on people committing (or merely suspected of committing) smaller crimes (i.e you had illegal drugs on you) and having assets seized. The US Supreme Court recently limited actions like this, but they still occur with some frequency. Most of the CAF examples you find via searches are of this type.

      • CBP - These tend to be aimed at people believed to be actively doing something like smuggling, laundering money, etc.

      The CBP doesn't seem to do this as often, but that's probably because there's a lot more police and people in the general population than go through customs. The largest customs case of CAF centers around an Albanian man who tried to fly with undeclared cash. CBP miscounted the cash and then seized it under a variety of laws aimed at money laundering.



      But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?



      The main thing is you don't need to stand out to where they decide to inquire about why you have a lot of cash. CBP might just check your documents and let you through. If you like to smoke marijuana or do drugs, I would make sure I refrained from that for some time before and during your trip, lest a CBP dog indicate you, or your baggage, smell like drugs.



      I would also get a visa. You might not need one for your visit, but it's far less likely that someone who has gone through that hassle for a simple visit is trying to launder money.



      I know you're aware, but it bears repeating that if you want to bring more than $10,000 in cash, be sure to declare it because the CBP website directly states




      Failure to declare currency in amounts more than $10,000 can result in its seizure.




      There's a large chance they will use CAF to seize it if you're caught like this.






      share|improve this answer



























        4














        First off, let's differentiate the two Civil Asset Forfeitures(CAFs):



        • Police - This tends to be focused on people committing (or merely suspected of committing) smaller crimes (i.e you had illegal drugs on you) and having assets seized. The US Supreme Court recently limited actions like this, but they still occur with some frequency. Most of the CAF examples you find via searches are of this type.

        • CBP - These tend to be aimed at people believed to be actively doing something like smuggling, laundering money, etc.

        The CBP doesn't seem to do this as often, but that's probably because there's a lot more police and people in the general population than go through customs. The largest customs case of CAF centers around an Albanian man who tried to fly with undeclared cash. CBP miscounted the cash and then seized it under a variety of laws aimed at money laundering.



        But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?



        The main thing is you don't need to stand out to where they decide to inquire about why you have a lot of cash. CBP might just check your documents and let you through. If you like to smoke marijuana or do drugs, I would make sure I refrained from that for some time before and during your trip, lest a CBP dog indicate you, or your baggage, smell like drugs.



        I would also get a visa. You might not need one for your visit, but it's far less likely that someone who has gone through that hassle for a simple visit is trying to launder money.



        I know you're aware, but it bears repeating that if you want to bring more than $10,000 in cash, be sure to declare it because the CBP website directly states




        Failure to declare currency in amounts more than $10,000 can result in its seizure.




        There's a large chance they will use CAF to seize it if you're caught like this.






        share|improve this answer

























          4












          4








          4







          First off, let's differentiate the two Civil Asset Forfeitures(CAFs):



          • Police - This tends to be focused on people committing (or merely suspected of committing) smaller crimes (i.e you had illegal drugs on you) and having assets seized. The US Supreme Court recently limited actions like this, but they still occur with some frequency. Most of the CAF examples you find via searches are of this type.

          • CBP - These tend to be aimed at people believed to be actively doing something like smuggling, laundering money, etc.

          The CBP doesn't seem to do this as often, but that's probably because there's a lot more police and people in the general population than go through customs. The largest customs case of CAF centers around an Albanian man who tried to fly with undeclared cash. CBP miscounted the cash and then seized it under a variety of laws aimed at money laundering.



          But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?



          The main thing is you don't need to stand out to where they decide to inquire about why you have a lot of cash. CBP might just check your documents and let you through. If you like to smoke marijuana or do drugs, I would make sure I refrained from that for some time before and during your trip, lest a CBP dog indicate you, or your baggage, smell like drugs.



          I would also get a visa. You might not need one for your visit, but it's far less likely that someone who has gone through that hassle for a simple visit is trying to launder money.



          I know you're aware, but it bears repeating that if you want to bring more than $10,000 in cash, be sure to declare it because the CBP website directly states




          Failure to declare currency in amounts more than $10,000 can result in its seizure.




          There's a large chance they will use CAF to seize it if you're caught like this.






          share|improve this answer













          First off, let's differentiate the two Civil Asset Forfeitures(CAFs):



          • Police - This tends to be focused on people committing (or merely suspected of committing) smaller crimes (i.e you had illegal drugs on you) and having assets seized. The US Supreme Court recently limited actions like this, but they still occur with some frequency. Most of the CAF examples you find via searches are of this type.

          • CBP - These tend to be aimed at people believed to be actively doing something like smuggling, laundering money, etc.

          The CBP doesn't seem to do this as often, but that's probably because there's a lot more police and people in the general population than go through customs. The largest customs case of CAF centers around an Albanian man who tried to fly with undeclared cash. CBP miscounted the cash and then seized it under a variety of laws aimed at money laundering.



          But can someone give me some idea of where the effective boundary is?



          The main thing is you don't need to stand out to where they decide to inquire about why you have a lot of cash. CBP might just check your documents and let you through. If you like to smoke marijuana or do drugs, I would make sure I refrained from that for some time before and during your trip, lest a CBP dog indicate you, or your baggage, smell like drugs.



          I would also get a visa. You might not need one for your visit, but it's far less likely that someone who has gone through that hassle for a simple visit is trying to launder money.



          I know you're aware, but it bears repeating that if you want to bring more than $10,000 in cash, be sure to declare it because the CBP website directly states




          Failure to declare currency in amounts more than $10,000 can result in its seizure.




          There's a large chance they will use CAF to seize it if you're caught like this.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 5 hours ago









          MachavityMachavity

          1,519317




          1,519317





















              1














              There is no such thing as a lower bound. Civil forfeiture laws and practices vary greatly from state to state. See, for example, https://ij.org/report/policing-for-profit/grading-state-federal-civil-forfeiture-laws/



              It is certainly a rather unfair and frustrating practice of law enforcement, but on the other hand, it's not common either and the chance of you are encountering such a situation as a tourist a quite small.



              The best protection is to carry no or little cash. Credit and debit cards are widely accepted and if you really need cash for anything, you can get it easily at the nearest ATM. Cash is used less and less: For example the food truck outside of Boston South station where you buy your morning coffee doesn't accept cash at all: plastic only. I sometimes go months without using cash.






              share|improve this answer



























                1














                There is no such thing as a lower bound. Civil forfeiture laws and practices vary greatly from state to state. See, for example, https://ij.org/report/policing-for-profit/grading-state-federal-civil-forfeiture-laws/



                It is certainly a rather unfair and frustrating practice of law enforcement, but on the other hand, it's not common either and the chance of you are encountering such a situation as a tourist a quite small.



                The best protection is to carry no or little cash. Credit and debit cards are widely accepted and if you really need cash for anything, you can get it easily at the nearest ATM. Cash is used less and less: For example the food truck outside of Boston South station where you buy your morning coffee doesn't accept cash at all: plastic only. I sometimes go months without using cash.






                share|improve this answer

























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  There is no such thing as a lower bound. Civil forfeiture laws and practices vary greatly from state to state. See, for example, https://ij.org/report/policing-for-profit/grading-state-federal-civil-forfeiture-laws/



                  It is certainly a rather unfair and frustrating practice of law enforcement, but on the other hand, it's not common either and the chance of you are encountering such a situation as a tourist a quite small.



                  The best protection is to carry no or little cash. Credit and debit cards are widely accepted and if you really need cash for anything, you can get it easily at the nearest ATM. Cash is used less and less: For example the food truck outside of Boston South station where you buy your morning coffee doesn't accept cash at all: plastic only. I sometimes go months without using cash.






                  share|improve this answer













                  There is no such thing as a lower bound. Civil forfeiture laws and practices vary greatly from state to state. See, for example, https://ij.org/report/policing-for-profit/grading-state-federal-civil-forfeiture-laws/



                  It is certainly a rather unfair and frustrating practice of law enforcement, but on the other hand, it's not common either and the chance of you are encountering such a situation as a tourist a quite small.



                  The best protection is to carry no or little cash. Credit and debit cards are widely accepted and if you really need cash for anything, you can get it easily at the nearest ATM. Cash is used less and less: For example the food truck outside of Boston South station where you buy your morning coffee doesn't accept cash at all: plastic only. I sometimes go months without using cash.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 7 hours ago









                  HilmarHilmar

                  23.5k13775




                  23.5k13775





















                      -1














                      There is no safe limit regarding civil asset forfeiture: the bulk of the confiscated cash is small amounts not warranting the hassle of a contest. Basically try to be white and reasonably well-dressed (like a large-scale drug dealer would be) and you'll not likely be bothered. The problem with actually declaring large amounts of cash is that this information will immediately be passed on to DHS or local law enforcement agents which will likely pick on you "by chance" when you leave the airport premises.



                      So basically don't bring large amounts of cash into the U.S., whether declared or not, if you don't want them to get stolen by U.S. "law" enforcement. Particularly not if you don't have the kind of race/standing/backup to look like a lot of trouble.






                      share|improve this answer























                      • 'The problem with actually declaring large amounts of cash is that this information will immediately be passed on to DHS or local law enforcement agents which will likely pick on you "by chance" when you leave the airport premises.' [Citation needed]

                        – David Richerby
                        20 mins ago















                      -1














                      There is no safe limit regarding civil asset forfeiture: the bulk of the confiscated cash is small amounts not warranting the hassle of a contest. Basically try to be white and reasonably well-dressed (like a large-scale drug dealer would be) and you'll not likely be bothered. The problem with actually declaring large amounts of cash is that this information will immediately be passed on to DHS or local law enforcement agents which will likely pick on you "by chance" when you leave the airport premises.



                      So basically don't bring large amounts of cash into the U.S., whether declared or not, if you don't want them to get stolen by U.S. "law" enforcement. Particularly not if you don't have the kind of race/standing/backup to look like a lot of trouble.






                      share|improve this answer























                      • 'The problem with actually declaring large amounts of cash is that this information will immediately be passed on to DHS or local law enforcement agents which will likely pick on you "by chance" when you leave the airport premises.' [Citation needed]

                        – David Richerby
                        20 mins ago













                      -1












                      -1








                      -1







                      There is no safe limit regarding civil asset forfeiture: the bulk of the confiscated cash is small amounts not warranting the hassle of a contest. Basically try to be white and reasonably well-dressed (like a large-scale drug dealer would be) and you'll not likely be bothered. The problem with actually declaring large amounts of cash is that this information will immediately be passed on to DHS or local law enforcement agents which will likely pick on you "by chance" when you leave the airport premises.



                      So basically don't bring large amounts of cash into the U.S., whether declared or not, if you don't want them to get stolen by U.S. "law" enforcement. Particularly not if you don't have the kind of race/standing/backup to look like a lot of trouble.






                      share|improve this answer













                      There is no safe limit regarding civil asset forfeiture: the bulk of the confiscated cash is small amounts not warranting the hassle of a contest. Basically try to be white and reasonably well-dressed (like a large-scale drug dealer would be) and you'll not likely be bothered. The problem with actually declaring large amounts of cash is that this information will immediately be passed on to DHS or local law enforcement agents which will likely pick on you "by chance" when you leave the airport premises.



                      So basically don't bring large amounts of cash into the U.S., whether declared or not, if you don't want them to get stolen by U.S. "law" enforcement. Particularly not if you don't have the kind of race/standing/backup to look like a lot of trouble.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 5 hours ago







                      user96519



















                      • 'The problem with actually declaring large amounts of cash is that this information will immediately be passed on to DHS or local law enforcement agents which will likely pick on you "by chance" when you leave the airport premises.' [Citation needed]

                        – David Richerby
                        20 mins ago

















                      • 'The problem with actually declaring large amounts of cash is that this information will immediately be passed on to DHS or local law enforcement agents which will likely pick on you "by chance" when you leave the airport premises.' [Citation needed]

                        – David Richerby
                        20 mins ago
















                      'The problem with actually declaring large amounts of cash is that this information will immediately be passed on to DHS or local law enforcement agents which will likely pick on you "by chance" when you leave the airport premises.' [Citation needed]

                      – David Richerby
                      20 mins ago





                      'The problem with actually declaring large amounts of cash is that this information will immediately be passed on to DHS or local law enforcement agents which will likely pick on you "by chance" when you leave the airport premises.' [Citation needed]

                      – David Richerby
                      20 mins ago

















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Travel Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftravel.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137298%2fhow-much-cash-can-i-safely-carry-into-the-usa-and-avoid-civil-forfeiture%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Nidaros erkebispedøme

                      Birsay

                      Where did Arya get these scars? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Favourite questions and answers from the 1st quarter of 2019Why did Arya refuse to end it?Has the pronunciation of Arya Stark's name changed?Has Arya forgiven people?Why did Arya Stark lose her vision?Why can Arya still use the faces?Has the Narrow Sea become narrower?Does Arya Stark know how to make poisons outside of the House of Black and White?Why did Nymeria leave Arya?Why did Arya not kill the Lannister soldiers she encountered in the Riverlands?What is the current canonical age of Sansa, Bran and Arya Stark?