Is it possible to stack the damage done by the Absorb Elements spell? The Next CEO of Stack...

Can I cast Thunderwave and be at the center of its bottom face, but not be affected by it?

How to unfasten electrical subpanel attached with ramset

Raspberry pi 3 B with Ubuntu 18.04 server arm64: what pi version

Could a dragon use its wings to swim?

What happens if you break a law in another country outside of that country?

How do I secure a TV wall mount?

How should I connect my cat5 cable to connectors having an orange-green line?

Physiological effects of huge anime eyes

Calculating discount not working

Can a PhD from a non-TU9 German university become a professor in a TU9 university?

Is it correct to say moon starry nights?

Another proof that dividing by 0 does not exist -- is it right?

How seriously should I take size and weight limits of hand luggage?

How to find if SQL server backup is encrypted with TDE without restoring the backup

Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?

What does this strange code stamp on my passport mean?

Free fall ellipse or parabola?

Man transported from Alternate World into ours by a Neutrino Detector

Is the offspring between a demon and a celestial possible? If so what is it called and is it in a book somewhere?

How to show a landlord what we have in savings?

How can I separate the number from the unit in argument?

How dangerous is XSS

Can Sri Krishna be called 'a person'?

Compensation for working overtime on Saturdays



Is it possible to stack the damage done by the Absorb Elements spell?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow do you determine the 'most potent effect' for overlapping spells?Does your spell modifier add to your spell damage?Does Absorb Elements give you resistance to damage from the triggering attack?Does a Lore Master's Spell Secrets ability change only a spell's damage output, or all references to a damage type?Does the extra damage from Booming Blade stack if the spell is cast twice on the same target?Is a melee spell attack also a melee attack?Do you still make saving throws for half when benefiting from Absorb Elements?Is Heart of the Storm triggered by spells that may or may not deal lightning or thunder damage?Is it possible to add more variety to the Create A Spell table without breaking game balance?Is there a reason this homebrew spell wouldn't work with the Attack action?Does the Absorb Elements spell combine with a sorcerer's Distant Spell metamagic option?












6












$begingroup$


The absorb elements spell says




The spell captures some of the incoming energy, lessening its effect
on you and storing it for your next melee attack. You have resistance
to the triggering damage type until the start of your next turn. Also,
the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the
target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell
ends.



At Higher Levels. When you cast this spell using a spell slot of 2nd
level or higher, the extra damage increases by 1d6 for each slot level
above 1st.




So if my Sorcerer is hit with a fire bolt from the enemy mage, I use my reaction to cast absorb elements at 3rd level so I now have 3d6 fire damage stored for my next melee attack, I then use my action to cast a 1st-level spell and my turn ends, resetting my reaction. Another enemy hits me with chain lightning and I use absorb elements again at 3rd level.



Do I now have 3d6 fire + 3d6 lightning or just 3d6 lightning stored for my next melee attack?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Mar 18 at 0:47
















6












$begingroup$


The absorb elements spell says




The spell captures some of the incoming energy, lessening its effect
on you and storing it for your next melee attack. You have resistance
to the triggering damage type until the start of your next turn. Also,
the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the
target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell
ends.



At Higher Levels. When you cast this spell using a spell slot of 2nd
level or higher, the extra damage increases by 1d6 for each slot level
above 1st.




So if my Sorcerer is hit with a fire bolt from the enemy mage, I use my reaction to cast absorb elements at 3rd level so I now have 3d6 fire damage stored for my next melee attack, I then use my action to cast a 1st-level spell and my turn ends, resetting my reaction. Another enemy hits me with chain lightning and I use absorb elements again at 3rd level.



Do I now have 3d6 fire + 3d6 lightning or just 3d6 lightning stored for my next melee attack?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Mar 18 at 0:47














6












6








6


1



$begingroup$


The absorb elements spell says




The spell captures some of the incoming energy, lessening its effect
on you and storing it for your next melee attack. You have resistance
to the triggering damage type until the start of your next turn. Also,
the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the
target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell
ends.



At Higher Levels. When you cast this spell using a spell slot of 2nd
level or higher, the extra damage increases by 1d6 for each slot level
above 1st.




So if my Sorcerer is hit with a fire bolt from the enemy mage, I use my reaction to cast absorb elements at 3rd level so I now have 3d6 fire damage stored for my next melee attack, I then use my action to cast a 1st-level spell and my turn ends, resetting my reaction. Another enemy hits me with chain lightning and I use absorb elements again at 3rd level.



Do I now have 3d6 fire + 3d6 lightning or just 3d6 lightning stored for my next melee attack?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




The absorb elements spell says




The spell captures some of the incoming energy, lessening its effect
on you and storing it for your next melee attack. You have resistance
to the triggering damage type until the start of your next turn. Also,
the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the
target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell
ends.



At Higher Levels. When you cast this spell using a spell slot of 2nd
level or higher, the extra damage increases by 1d6 for each slot level
above 1st.




So if my Sorcerer is hit with a fire bolt from the enemy mage, I use my reaction to cast absorb elements at 3rd level so I now have 3d6 fire damage stored for my next melee attack, I then use my action to cast a 1st-level spell and my turn ends, resetting my reaction. Another enemy hits me with chain lightning and I use absorb elements again at 3rd level.



Do I now have 3d6 fire + 3d6 lightning or just 3d6 lightning stored for my next melee attack?







dnd-5e spells damage stacking






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 18 at 0:46









V2Blast

26.1k590159




26.1k590159










asked Mar 18 at 0:32









BrendanBrendan

384




384












  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Mar 18 at 0:47


















  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    Mar 18 at 0:47
















$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Mar 18 at 0:47




$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Mar 18 at 0:47










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

No, the extra damage is only added to one attack on your next turn.



Read the Absorb Elements text carefully:




Also, the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell ends.




(emphasis added by me)



The spell only provides a benefit during the turn after you cast Absorb Elements. You cannot "store" the extra damage across multiple turns.



If the Sorcerer did not make a melee attack roll on their next turn, then the benefit of Absorb Elements is lost at the end of that turn.





Note: It is possible to cast Absorb Elements twice such that the durations overlap, but the damage won't stack. This is because a character's Reaction resets at the start of their turn, not at the end:




When you take a Reaction, you can’t take another one until the start of your next turn.




For example, suppose the Sorcerer takes fire damage before their turn, using their reaction to cast Absorb Elements. Then on the Sorcerer's turn, once their reaction resets, they somehow take fire damage again, and spend their reaction (again) to cast Absorb Elements (again). This would mean having multiple castings of the same spell, but their benefits do not stack:




The effects of the same spell cast multiple times don't combine, however. Instead, the most potent effect--such as the highest bonus--from those castings applies while their durations overlap, or the most recent effect applies if the castings are equally potent and their durations overlap.




If the Sorcerer proceeds to make an attack on this same turn, then only the "most recent" or "most potent" casting of Absorb Elements would apply to that attack.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it's worth noting that even though the damage buff from absorb elements only lasts until the end of your next turn, it's still possible to cast it twice and then attack on your turn. Cast it once before your turn, then, when your turn starts, your reaction comes back and you cast it again on your turn (perhaps in response to an opportunity attack made with an elemental-enchanted weapon), and then finally make a melee attack on your turn. So you might want to explain what happens in that case.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 1:05








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I thought multiple castings of the same spell don't stack.
    $endgroup$
    – MikeQ
    Mar 18 at 1:09






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I'm saying that it's possible to apply two castings of absorb elements to the same attack, and it's not 100% clear what happens in this case, especially if the triggering damage types are different, as in the OP's example. If they don't stack, then which is the "stronger effect" of 3d6 fire and 3d6 lightning?
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 1:11








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @RyanThompson I understand that you can cast absorb elements once before your turn, then again during your turn, and then attack. But that means having the same spell active twice, and so the second casting replaces the first. Am I missing something?
    $endgroup$
    – MikeQ
    Mar 18 at 1:36








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    When effects from multiple castings overlap, the most potent one takes precedence, or the most recent if equally potent. I'm saying that "most potent" is a bit ambiguous when considering different damage types.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 1:41





















8












$begingroup$

The situation you described isn't possible.



You must use your reaction to cast absorb elements, and its effect benefits your first hit with a melee attack on your next turn, regardless of which turn your reaction occurs on (even your own).



You regain your reaction at the start of your turn, not the end of your turn (see the rules on Reactions):




When you take a reaction, you can't take another one until the start of your next turn.




If you cast absorb elements using your reaction in response to taking fire damage, then you could benefit from the added fire damage on the first hit on your next turn. Since your reaction is gone now, you will be unable to cast absorb elements again before your next turn starts. You regain your reaction at the start of your next turn, but even if you manage to use your reaction on that same turn to cast absorb elements again, the second casting would benefit your first hit on the next turn after that one, not on the current turn.



To put it briefly: the start of any given "next turn" can be preceded by at most one casting of absorb elements, since you have at most one reaction prior to that "next turn."



So, no, it's not possible for the added damage effect of two absorb elements castings to stack on a single hit because the two castings will be forced to benefit hits made on successive turns, not the same turn.





There aren't any edge cases to the above answer that I'm aware of.



You only have one reaction to use, barring special rules that would violate the game's design principles, according to the Dungeon Master's Guide section on Creating New Character Options (paraphrased for brevity):




Beware of adding anything to your game that allows a character to use more than one reaction per round. Rules and game elements that override the rules for reactions can seriously unbalance or overcomplicate your game.




There aren't any magic weapons, epic boons, or other special features I'm aware of that allow you to cast a reaction spell using something other than a reaction in the official rules (as of the current errata accounting for spell scroll casting times).



This is why my answer doesn't address what would happen if one hit were to benefit twice from absorb elements: it's a hypothetical that falls outside the rules.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is a good point that missed: because it says the first hit "on your next turn" and not something like "before the end of your next turn", two castings can't possibly apply to the same attack.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 14:54












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143360%2fis-it-possible-to-stack-the-damage-done-by-the-absorb-elements-spell%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









10












$begingroup$

No, the extra damage is only added to one attack on your next turn.



Read the Absorb Elements text carefully:




Also, the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell ends.




(emphasis added by me)



The spell only provides a benefit during the turn after you cast Absorb Elements. You cannot "store" the extra damage across multiple turns.



If the Sorcerer did not make a melee attack roll on their next turn, then the benefit of Absorb Elements is lost at the end of that turn.





Note: It is possible to cast Absorb Elements twice such that the durations overlap, but the damage won't stack. This is because a character's Reaction resets at the start of their turn, not at the end:




When you take a Reaction, you can’t take another one until the start of your next turn.




For example, suppose the Sorcerer takes fire damage before their turn, using their reaction to cast Absorb Elements. Then on the Sorcerer's turn, once their reaction resets, they somehow take fire damage again, and spend their reaction (again) to cast Absorb Elements (again). This would mean having multiple castings of the same spell, but their benefits do not stack:




The effects of the same spell cast multiple times don't combine, however. Instead, the most potent effect--such as the highest bonus--from those castings applies while their durations overlap, or the most recent effect applies if the castings are equally potent and their durations overlap.




If the Sorcerer proceeds to make an attack on this same turn, then only the "most recent" or "most potent" casting of Absorb Elements would apply to that attack.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it's worth noting that even though the damage buff from absorb elements only lasts until the end of your next turn, it's still possible to cast it twice and then attack on your turn. Cast it once before your turn, then, when your turn starts, your reaction comes back and you cast it again on your turn (perhaps in response to an opportunity attack made with an elemental-enchanted weapon), and then finally make a melee attack on your turn. So you might want to explain what happens in that case.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 1:05








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I thought multiple castings of the same spell don't stack.
    $endgroup$
    – MikeQ
    Mar 18 at 1:09






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I'm saying that it's possible to apply two castings of absorb elements to the same attack, and it's not 100% clear what happens in this case, especially if the triggering damage types are different, as in the OP's example. If they don't stack, then which is the "stronger effect" of 3d6 fire and 3d6 lightning?
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 1:11








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @RyanThompson I understand that you can cast absorb elements once before your turn, then again during your turn, and then attack. But that means having the same spell active twice, and so the second casting replaces the first. Am I missing something?
    $endgroup$
    – MikeQ
    Mar 18 at 1:36








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    When effects from multiple castings overlap, the most potent one takes precedence, or the most recent if equally potent. I'm saying that "most potent" is a bit ambiguous when considering different damage types.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 1:41


















10












$begingroup$

No, the extra damage is only added to one attack on your next turn.



Read the Absorb Elements text carefully:




Also, the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell ends.




(emphasis added by me)



The spell only provides a benefit during the turn after you cast Absorb Elements. You cannot "store" the extra damage across multiple turns.



If the Sorcerer did not make a melee attack roll on their next turn, then the benefit of Absorb Elements is lost at the end of that turn.





Note: It is possible to cast Absorb Elements twice such that the durations overlap, but the damage won't stack. This is because a character's Reaction resets at the start of their turn, not at the end:




When you take a Reaction, you can’t take another one until the start of your next turn.




For example, suppose the Sorcerer takes fire damage before their turn, using their reaction to cast Absorb Elements. Then on the Sorcerer's turn, once their reaction resets, they somehow take fire damage again, and spend their reaction (again) to cast Absorb Elements (again). This would mean having multiple castings of the same spell, but their benefits do not stack:




The effects of the same spell cast multiple times don't combine, however. Instead, the most potent effect--such as the highest bonus--from those castings applies while their durations overlap, or the most recent effect applies if the castings are equally potent and their durations overlap.




If the Sorcerer proceeds to make an attack on this same turn, then only the "most recent" or "most potent" casting of Absorb Elements would apply to that attack.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it's worth noting that even though the damage buff from absorb elements only lasts until the end of your next turn, it's still possible to cast it twice and then attack on your turn. Cast it once before your turn, then, when your turn starts, your reaction comes back and you cast it again on your turn (perhaps in response to an opportunity attack made with an elemental-enchanted weapon), and then finally make a melee attack on your turn. So you might want to explain what happens in that case.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 1:05








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I thought multiple castings of the same spell don't stack.
    $endgroup$
    – MikeQ
    Mar 18 at 1:09






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I'm saying that it's possible to apply two castings of absorb elements to the same attack, and it's not 100% clear what happens in this case, especially if the triggering damage types are different, as in the OP's example. If they don't stack, then which is the "stronger effect" of 3d6 fire and 3d6 lightning?
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 1:11








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @RyanThompson I understand that you can cast absorb elements once before your turn, then again during your turn, and then attack. But that means having the same spell active twice, and so the second casting replaces the first. Am I missing something?
    $endgroup$
    – MikeQ
    Mar 18 at 1:36








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    When effects from multiple castings overlap, the most potent one takes precedence, or the most recent if equally potent. I'm saying that "most potent" is a bit ambiguous when considering different damage types.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 1:41
















10












10








10





$begingroup$

No, the extra damage is only added to one attack on your next turn.



Read the Absorb Elements text carefully:




Also, the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell ends.




(emphasis added by me)



The spell only provides a benefit during the turn after you cast Absorb Elements. You cannot "store" the extra damage across multiple turns.



If the Sorcerer did not make a melee attack roll on their next turn, then the benefit of Absorb Elements is lost at the end of that turn.





Note: It is possible to cast Absorb Elements twice such that the durations overlap, but the damage won't stack. This is because a character's Reaction resets at the start of their turn, not at the end:




When you take a Reaction, you can’t take another one until the start of your next turn.




For example, suppose the Sorcerer takes fire damage before their turn, using their reaction to cast Absorb Elements. Then on the Sorcerer's turn, once their reaction resets, they somehow take fire damage again, and spend their reaction (again) to cast Absorb Elements (again). This would mean having multiple castings of the same spell, but their benefits do not stack:




The effects of the same spell cast multiple times don't combine, however. Instead, the most potent effect--such as the highest bonus--from those castings applies while their durations overlap, or the most recent effect applies if the castings are equally potent and their durations overlap.




If the Sorcerer proceeds to make an attack on this same turn, then only the "most recent" or "most potent" casting of Absorb Elements would apply to that attack.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



No, the extra damage is only added to one attack on your next turn.



Read the Absorb Elements text carefully:




Also, the first time you hit with a melee attack on your next turn, the target takes an extra 1d6 damage of the triggering type, and the spell ends.




(emphasis added by me)



The spell only provides a benefit during the turn after you cast Absorb Elements. You cannot "store" the extra damage across multiple turns.



If the Sorcerer did not make a melee attack roll on their next turn, then the benefit of Absorb Elements is lost at the end of that turn.





Note: It is possible to cast Absorb Elements twice such that the durations overlap, but the damage won't stack. This is because a character's Reaction resets at the start of their turn, not at the end:




When you take a Reaction, you can’t take another one until the start of your next turn.




For example, suppose the Sorcerer takes fire damage before their turn, using their reaction to cast Absorb Elements. Then on the Sorcerer's turn, once their reaction resets, they somehow take fire damage again, and spend their reaction (again) to cast Absorb Elements (again). This would mean having multiple castings of the same spell, but their benefits do not stack:




The effects of the same spell cast multiple times don't combine, however. Instead, the most potent effect--such as the highest bonus--from those castings applies while their durations overlap, or the most recent effect applies if the castings are equally potent and their durations overlap.




If the Sorcerer proceeds to make an attack on this same turn, then only the "most recent" or "most potent" casting of Absorb Elements would apply to that attack.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 18 at 2:11

























answered Mar 18 at 0:53









MikeQMikeQ

14.9k63388




14.9k63388








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it's worth noting that even though the damage buff from absorb elements only lasts until the end of your next turn, it's still possible to cast it twice and then attack on your turn. Cast it once before your turn, then, when your turn starts, your reaction comes back and you cast it again on your turn (perhaps in response to an opportunity attack made with an elemental-enchanted weapon), and then finally make a melee attack on your turn. So you might want to explain what happens in that case.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 1:05








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I thought multiple castings of the same spell don't stack.
    $endgroup$
    – MikeQ
    Mar 18 at 1:09






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I'm saying that it's possible to apply two castings of absorb elements to the same attack, and it's not 100% clear what happens in this case, especially if the triggering damage types are different, as in the OP's example. If they don't stack, then which is the "stronger effect" of 3d6 fire and 3d6 lightning?
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 1:11








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @RyanThompson I understand that you can cast absorb elements once before your turn, then again during your turn, and then attack. But that means having the same spell active twice, and so the second casting replaces the first. Am I missing something?
    $endgroup$
    – MikeQ
    Mar 18 at 1:36








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    When effects from multiple castings overlap, the most potent one takes precedence, or the most recent if equally potent. I'm saying that "most potent" is a bit ambiguous when considering different damage types.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 1:41
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think it's worth noting that even though the damage buff from absorb elements only lasts until the end of your next turn, it's still possible to cast it twice and then attack on your turn. Cast it once before your turn, then, when your turn starts, your reaction comes back and you cast it again on your turn (perhaps in response to an opportunity attack made with an elemental-enchanted weapon), and then finally make a melee attack on your turn. So you might want to explain what happens in that case.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 1:05








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I thought multiple castings of the same spell don't stack.
    $endgroup$
    – MikeQ
    Mar 18 at 1:09






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I'm saying that it's possible to apply two castings of absorb elements to the same attack, and it's not 100% clear what happens in this case, especially if the triggering damage types are different, as in the OP's example. If they don't stack, then which is the "stronger effect" of 3d6 fire and 3d6 lightning?
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 1:11








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @RyanThompson I understand that you can cast absorb elements once before your turn, then again during your turn, and then attack. But that means having the same spell active twice, and so the second casting replaces the first. Am I missing something?
    $endgroup$
    – MikeQ
    Mar 18 at 1:36








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    When effects from multiple castings overlap, the most potent one takes precedence, or the most recent if equally potent. I'm saying that "most potent" is a bit ambiguous when considering different damage types.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 1:41










1




1




$begingroup$
I think it's worth noting that even though the damage buff from absorb elements only lasts until the end of your next turn, it's still possible to cast it twice and then attack on your turn. Cast it once before your turn, then, when your turn starts, your reaction comes back and you cast it again on your turn (perhaps in response to an opportunity attack made with an elemental-enchanted weapon), and then finally make a melee attack on your turn. So you might want to explain what happens in that case.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Mar 18 at 1:05






$begingroup$
I think it's worth noting that even though the damage buff from absorb elements only lasts until the end of your next turn, it's still possible to cast it twice and then attack on your turn. Cast it once before your turn, then, when your turn starts, your reaction comes back and you cast it again on your turn (perhaps in response to an opportunity attack made with an elemental-enchanted weapon), and then finally make a melee attack on your turn. So you might want to explain what happens in that case.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Mar 18 at 1:05






1




1




$begingroup$
I thought multiple castings of the same spell don't stack.
$endgroup$
– MikeQ
Mar 18 at 1:09




$begingroup$
I thought multiple castings of the same spell don't stack.
$endgroup$
– MikeQ
Mar 18 at 1:09




3




3




$begingroup$
I'm saying that it's possible to apply two castings of absorb elements to the same attack, and it's not 100% clear what happens in this case, especially if the triggering damage types are different, as in the OP's example. If they don't stack, then which is the "stronger effect" of 3d6 fire and 3d6 lightning?
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Mar 18 at 1:11






$begingroup$
I'm saying that it's possible to apply two castings of absorb elements to the same attack, and it's not 100% clear what happens in this case, especially if the triggering damage types are different, as in the OP's example. If they don't stack, then which is the "stronger effect" of 3d6 fire and 3d6 lightning?
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Mar 18 at 1:11






2




2




$begingroup$
@RyanThompson I understand that you can cast absorb elements once before your turn, then again during your turn, and then attack. But that means having the same spell active twice, and so the second casting replaces the first. Am I missing something?
$endgroup$
– MikeQ
Mar 18 at 1:36






$begingroup$
@RyanThompson I understand that you can cast absorb elements once before your turn, then again during your turn, and then attack. But that means having the same spell active twice, and so the second casting replaces the first. Am I missing something?
$endgroup$
– MikeQ
Mar 18 at 1:36






1




1




$begingroup$
When effects from multiple castings overlap, the most potent one takes precedence, or the most recent if equally potent. I'm saying that "most potent" is a bit ambiguous when considering different damage types.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Mar 18 at 1:41






$begingroup$
When effects from multiple castings overlap, the most potent one takes precedence, or the most recent if equally potent. I'm saying that "most potent" is a bit ambiguous when considering different damage types.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Mar 18 at 1:41















8












$begingroup$

The situation you described isn't possible.



You must use your reaction to cast absorb elements, and its effect benefits your first hit with a melee attack on your next turn, regardless of which turn your reaction occurs on (even your own).



You regain your reaction at the start of your turn, not the end of your turn (see the rules on Reactions):




When you take a reaction, you can't take another one until the start of your next turn.




If you cast absorb elements using your reaction in response to taking fire damage, then you could benefit from the added fire damage on the first hit on your next turn. Since your reaction is gone now, you will be unable to cast absorb elements again before your next turn starts. You regain your reaction at the start of your next turn, but even if you manage to use your reaction on that same turn to cast absorb elements again, the second casting would benefit your first hit on the next turn after that one, not on the current turn.



To put it briefly: the start of any given "next turn" can be preceded by at most one casting of absorb elements, since you have at most one reaction prior to that "next turn."



So, no, it's not possible for the added damage effect of two absorb elements castings to stack on a single hit because the two castings will be forced to benefit hits made on successive turns, not the same turn.





There aren't any edge cases to the above answer that I'm aware of.



You only have one reaction to use, barring special rules that would violate the game's design principles, according to the Dungeon Master's Guide section on Creating New Character Options (paraphrased for brevity):




Beware of adding anything to your game that allows a character to use more than one reaction per round. Rules and game elements that override the rules for reactions can seriously unbalance or overcomplicate your game.




There aren't any magic weapons, epic boons, or other special features I'm aware of that allow you to cast a reaction spell using something other than a reaction in the official rules (as of the current errata accounting for spell scroll casting times).



This is why my answer doesn't address what would happen if one hit were to benefit twice from absorb elements: it's a hypothetical that falls outside the rules.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is a good point that missed: because it says the first hit "on your next turn" and not something like "before the end of your next turn", two castings can't possibly apply to the same attack.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 14:54
















8












$begingroup$

The situation you described isn't possible.



You must use your reaction to cast absorb elements, and its effect benefits your first hit with a melee attack on your next turn, regardless of which turn your reaction occurs on (even your own).



You regain your reaction at the start of your turn, not the end of your turn (see the rules on Reactions):




When you take a reaction, you can't take another one until the start of your next turn.




If you cast absorb elements using your reaction in response to taking fire damage, then you could benefit from the added fire damage on the first hit on your next turn. Since your reaction is gone now, you will be unable to cast absorb elements again before your next turn starts. You regain your reaction at the start of your next turn, but even if you manage to use your reaction on that same turn to cast absorb elements again, the second casting would benefit your first hit on the next turn after that one, not on the current turn.



To put it briefly: the start of any given "next turn" can be preceded by at most one casting of absorb elements, since you have at most one reaction prior to that "next turn."



So, no, it's not possible for the added damage effect of two absorb elements castings to stack on a single hit because the two castings will be forced to benefit hits made on successive turns, not the same turn.





There aren't any edge cases to the above answer that I'm aware of.



You only have one reaction to use, barring special rules that would violate the game's design principles, according to the Dungeon Master's Guide section on Creating New Character Options (paraphrased for brevity):




Beware of adding anything to your game that allows a character to use more than one reaction per round. Rules and game elements that override the rules for reactions can seriously unbalance or overcomplicate your game.




There aren't any magic weapons, epic boons, or other special features I'm aware of that allow you to cast a reaction spell using something other than a reaction in the official rules (as of the current errata accounting for spell scroll casting times).



This is why my answer doesn't address what would happen if one hit were to benefit twice from absorb elements: it's a hypothetical that falls outside the rules.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is a good point that missed: because it says the first hit "on your next turn" and not something like "before the end of your next turn", two castings can't possibly apply to the same attack.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 14:54














8












8








8





$begingroup$

The situation you described isn't possible.



You must use your reaction to cast absorb elements, and its effect benefits your first hit with a melee attack on your next turn, regardless of which turn your reaction occurs on (even your own).



You regain your reaction at the start of your turn, not the end of your turn (see the rules on Reactions):




When you take a reaction, you can't take another one until the start of your next turn.




If you cast absorb elements using your reaction in response to taking fire damage, then you could benefit from the added fire damage on the first hit on your next turn. Since your reaction is gone now, you will be unable to cast absorb elements again before your next turn starts. You regain your reaction at the start of your next turn, but even if you manage to use your reaction on that same turn to cast absorb elements again, the second casting would benefit your first hit on the next turn after that one, not on the current turn.



To put it briefly: the start of any given "next turn" can be preceded by at most one casting of absorb elements, since you have at most one reaction prior to that "next turn."



So, no, it's not possible for the added damage effect of two absorb elements castings to stack on a single hit because the two castings will be forced to benefit hits made on successive turns, not the same turn.





There aren't any edge cases to the above answer that I'm aware of.



You only have one reaction to use, barring special rules that would violate the game's design principles, according to the Dungeon Master's Guide section on Creating New Character Options (paraphrased for brevity):




Beware of adding anything to your game that allows a character to use more than one reaction per round. Rules and game elements that override the rules for reactions can seriously unbalance or overcomplicate your game.




There aren't any magic weapons, epic boons, or other special features I'm aware of that allow you to cast a reaction spell using something other than a reaction in the official rules (as of the current errata accounting for spell scroll casting times).



This is why my answer doesn't address what would happen if one hit were to benefit twice from absorb elements: it's a hypothetical that falls outside the rules.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The situation you described isn't possible.



You must use your reaction to cast absorb elements, and its effect benefits your first hit with a melee attack on your next turn, regardless of which turn your reaction occurs on (even your own).



You regain your reaction at the start of your turn, not the end of your turn (see the rules on Reactions):




When you take a reaction, you can't take another one until the start of your next turn.




If you cast absorb elements using your reaction in response to taking fire damage, then you could benefit from the added fire damage on the first hit on your next turn. Since your reaction is gone now, you will be unable to cast absorb elements again before your next turn starts. You regain your reaction at the start of your next turn, but even if you manage to use your reaction on that same turn to cast absorb elements again, the second casting would benefit your first hit on the next turn after that one, not on the current turn.



To put it briefly: the start of any given "next turn" can be preceded by at most one casting of absorb elements, since you have at most one reaction prior to that "next turn."



So, no, it's not possible for the added damage effect of two absorb elements castings to stack on a single hit because the two castings will be forced to benefit hits made on successive turns, not the same turn.





There aren't any edge cases to the above answer that I'm aware of.



You only have one reaction to use, barring special rules that would violate the game's design principles, according to the Dungeon Master's Guide section on Creating New Character Options (paraphrased for brevity):




Beware of adding anything to your game that allows a character to use more than one reaction per round. Rules and game elements that override the rules for reactions can seriously unbalance or overcomplicate your game.




There aren't any magic weapons, epic boons, or other special features I'm aware of that allow you to cast a reaction spell using something other than a reaction in the official rules (as of the current errata accounting for spell scroll casting times).



This is why my answer doesn't address what would happen if one hit were to benefit twice from absorb elements: it's a hypothetical that falls outside the rules.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 18 at 2:50









BloodcinderBloodcinder

23.5k385142




23.5k385142








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is a good point that missed: because it says the first hit "on your next turn" and not something like "before the end of your next turn", two castings can't possibly apply to the same attack.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 14:54














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This is a good point that missed: because it says the first hit "on your next turn" and not something like "before the end of your next turn", two castings can't possibly apply to the same attack.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Mar 18 at 14:54








1




1




$begingroup$
This is a good point that missed: because it says the first hit "on your next turn" and not something like "before the end of your next turn", two castings can't possibly apply to the same attack.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Mar 18 at 14:54




$begingroup$
This is a good point that missed: because it says the first hit "on your next turn" and not something like "before the end of your next turn", two castings can't possibly apply to the same attack.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Mar 18 at 14:54


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143360%2fis-it-possible-to-stack-the-damage-done-by-the-absorb-elements-spell%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Nidaros erkebispedøme

Birsay

Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...