Proving that if a set A is denumerable and a set B that is finite and a subset of A, then $Asetminus B$ is...

Have any astronauts/cosmonauts died in space?

Print a physical multiplication table

Isn't the word "experience" wrongly used in this context?

Why is "la Gestapo" feminine?

Do people actually use the word "kaputt" in conversation?

DisplayForm problem with pi in FractionBox

Gauss brackets with double vertical lines

Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?

Why is indicated airspeed rather than ground speed used during the takeoff roll?

Jem'Hadar, something strange about their life expectancy

Emojional cryptic crossword

Can other pieces capture a threatening piece and prevent a checkmate?

Weird lines in Microsoft Word

Is VPN a layer 3 concept?

Exit shell with shortcut (not typing exit) that closes session properly

Turning a hard to access nut?

If I cast the Enlarge/Reduce spell on an arrow, what weapon could it count as?

UK Tourist Visa- Enquiry

How to find the largest number(s) in a list of elements, possibly non-unique?

How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?

Exposing a company lying about themselves in a tightly knit industry: Is my career at risk on the long run?

When should a starting writer get his own webpage?

PTIJ: Which Dr. Seuss books should one obtain?

Fair way to split coins



Proving that if a set A is denumerable and a set B that is finite and a subset of A, then $Asetminus B$ is denumerable


Basic Set-Theoretic Properties from HalmosReal Analysis, Folland Proposition 1.7 elementary familyProving that every set has a finite subset of ``smallest elements''.Set $A$ partitionable into denumerable sets implies injection from $mathbb{N}$ to $A$Relax Egoroff's Theorem to pointwise convergence a.e. and bounded a.e. pointwise limitSuppose $X$ is infinite and $A$ is a finite subset of $X$. Then $X$ and $X setminus A$ are equinumerousLet $X$ be uncountable and $A$ be a countable subset of $X$. Then $X$ and $X setminus A$ are equinumerousThe cardinality of every maximal subset of the independent set $mathcal{I}$ is same. (Matroid Theory)If a set $A$ is finite then $Acap B$ is a finite set.Proving a function from $mathbb{N}to Acup {x }$ is a bijection.













0












$begingroup$


Background:
This comes from the book: INTRODUCTION TO
MATHEMATICAL
PROOFS
Charles E. Roberts, Jr.
Indiana State University
Terre Haute, USA
A Transition to Advanced
Mathematics
Second Edition



A set $A$ is denumerable if and only if $Asim mathbb{N}$.



$Asim B$ if and only if there is a one-to-one correspondence (bijection) from $A$ to $B$.



Theorem 7.15 - If $A$ is a denumerable set and $B$ is a finite set, the $Acup B$ is a denumerable set.



Question:




Prove that if $A$ is a denumerable set and $B$ is a finite subset of $A$, then $Asetminus B$ is denumerable.




Attempted proof - Note that



$$begin{align*}
Asetminus B &= Acap B^c\
&= (Acup B)cap B^c
end{align*}$$



Borrowing from the comments below. Since $Acup B$ is denumerable by theorem 7.15, and any subset of a denumerable set is denumerable this implies that $Asetminus B$ is denumerable.



We know from theorem 7.15 that $A cup B$ is denumerable. I am just not sure how to show that the complement of the finite set $B$ with $Acup B$ is also denumerable.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Can't you just use the fact that subsets of denumerable sets are denumerable?
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Mar 12 at 4:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that $A = (Asetminus B)cup B$. What happens if $Asetminus B$ is not denumerable?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Mar 12 at 4:06










  • $begingroup$
    Other approach is to use the Hilbert's Hotel Problem. I think that the idea works fine.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Mar 12 at 4:08
















0












$begingroup$


Background:
This comes from the book: INTRODUCTION TO
MATHEMATICAL
PROOFS
Charles E. Roberts, Jr.
Indiana State University
Terre Haute, USA
A Transition to Advanced
Mathematics
Second Edition



A set $A$ is denumerable if and only if $Asim mathbb{N}$.



$Asim B$ if and only if there is a one-to-one correspondence (bijection) from $A$ to $B$.



Theorem 7.15 - If $A$ is a denumerable set and $B$ is a finite set, the $Acup B$ is a denumerable set.



Question:




Prove that if $A$ is a denumerable set and $B$ is a finite subset of $A$, then $Asetminus B$ is denumerable.




Attempted proof - Note that



$$begin{align*}
Asetminus B &= Acap B^c\
&= (Acup B)cap B^c
end{align*}$$



Borrowing from the comments below. Since $Acup B$ is denumerable by theorem 7.15, and any subset of a denumerable set is denumerable this implies that $Asetminus B$ is denumerable.



We know from theorem 7.15 that $A cup B$ is denumerable. I am just not sure how to show that the complement of the finite set $B$ with $Acup B$ is also denumerable.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Can't you just use the fact that subsets of denumerable sets are denumerable?
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Mar 12 at 4:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that $A = (Asetminus B)cup B$. What happens if $Asetminus B$ is not denumerable?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Mar 12 at 4:06










  • $begingroup$
    Other approach is to use the Hilbert's Hotel Problem. I think that the idea works fine.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Mar 12 at 4:08














0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


Background:
This comes from the book: INTRODUCTION TO
MATHEMATICAL
PROOFS
Charles E. Roberts, Jr.
Indiana State University
Terre Haute, USA
A Transition to Advanced
Mathematics
Second Edition



A set $A$ is denumerable if and only if $Asim mathbb{N}$.



$Asim B$ if and only if there is a one-to-one correspondence (bijection) from $A$ to $B$.



Theorem 7.15 - If $A$ is a denumerable set and $B$ is a finite set, the $Acup B$ is a denumerable set.



Question:




Prove that if $A$ is a denumerable set and $B$ is a finite subset of $A$, then $Asetminus B$ is denumerable.




Attempted proof - Note that



$$begin{align*}
Asetminus B &= Acap B^c\
&= (Acup B)cap B^c
end{align*}$$



Borrowing from the comments below. Since $Acup B$ is denumerable by theorem 7.15, and any subset of a denumerable set is denumerable this implies that $Asetminus B$ is denumerable.



We know from theorem 7.15 that $A cup B$ is denumerable. I am just not sure how to show that the complement of the finite set $B$ with $Acup B$ is also denumerable.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Background:
This comes from the book: INTRODUCTION TO
MATHEMATICAL
PROOFS
Charles E. Roberts, Jr.
Indiana State University
Terre Haute, USA
A Transition to Advanced
Mathematics
Second Edition



A set $A$ is denumerable if and only if $Asim mathbb{N}$.



$Asim B$ if and only if there is a one-to-one correspondence (bijection) from $A$ to $B$.



Theorem 7.15 - If $A$ is a denumerable set and $B$ is a finite set, the $Acup B$ is a denumerable set.



Question:




Prove that if $A$ is a denumerable set and $B$ is a finite subset of $A$, then $Asetminus B$ is denumerable.




Attempted proof - Note that



$$begin{align*}
Asetminus B &= Acap B^c\
&= (Acup B)cap B^c
end{align*}$$



Borrowing from the comments below. Since $Acup B$ is denumerable by theorem 7.15, and any subset of a denumerable set is denumerable this implies that $Asetminus B$ is denumerable.



We know from theorem 7.15 that $A cup B$ is denumerable. I am just not sure how to show that the complement of the finite set $B$ with $Acup B$ is also denumerable.







real-analysis proof-verification






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 12 at 4:15







Snorrlaxxx

















asked Mar 12 at 3:56









SnorrlaxxxSnorrlaxxx

1415




1415








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Can't you just use the fact that subsets of denumerable sets are denumerable?
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Mar 12 at 4:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that $A = (Asetminus B)cup B$. What happens if $Asetminus B$ is not denumerable?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Mar 12 at 4:06










  • $begingroup$
    Other approach is to use the Hilbert's Hotel Problem. I think that the idea works fine.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Mar 12 at 4:08














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Can't you just use the fact that subsets of denumerable sets are denumerable?
    $endgroup$
    – Don Thousand
    Mar 12 at 4:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that $A = (Asetminus B)cup B$. What happens if $Asetminus B$ is not denumerable?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Mar 12 at 4:06










  • $begingroup$
    Other approach is to use the Hilbert's Hotel Problem. I think that the idea works fine.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucas Corrêa
    Mar 12 at 4:08








2




2




$begingroup$
Can't you just use the fact that subsets of denumerable sets are denumerable?
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Mar 12 at 4:03




$begingroup$
Can't you just use the fact that subsets of denumerable sets are denumerable?
$endgroup$
– Don Thousand
Mar 12 at 4:03




1




1




$begingroup$
Note that $A = (Asetminus B)cup B$. What happens if $Asetminus B$ is not denumerable?
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
Mar 12 at 4:06




$begingroup$
Note that $A = (Asetminus B)cup B$. What happens if $Asetminus B$ is not denumerable?
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
Mar 12 at 4:06












$begingroup$
Other approach is to use the Hilbert's Hotel Problem. I think that the idea works fine.
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
Mar 12 at 4:08




$begingroup$
Other approach is to use the Hilbert's Hotel Problem. I think that the idea works fine.
$endgroup$
– Lucas Corrêa
Mar 12 at 4:08










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Try this:



We have that there exists a bijection $f:A to mathbb{N}$



Then $g = f^{-1}:mathbb{N} to A$ is a bijection too



And $B = {b_{1},...,b_{k}} subset A$



So, we have that for every $n in mathbb{N}$, $g(n) = a_{n} in A$



And $g(n_{i}) = b_{i}$ for some $n_{i}$ with $ 1 leq i leq k$



And suppose that $n_{1}<n_{2}< dots <n_{k}$



We are going to create a bijection $h:mathbb{N} to$ $A$ $B$



Let $d in mathbb{N}cup{0}$, $d = n_{k} - k$



We have a subset with $d$ elements ${1,2,...,n_{k}}$ ${n_{1},...n_{k}} = {c_{1},...,c_{d}}$



Let $h(n) = g(c_{n})$ if $1 leq n leq d$, and $h(n) = g(n + k)$ if $n>d$



Then $h$ define a bijection between $mathbb{N}$ and $A$ $B$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    First, we observe that $A setminus B$ is not finite, otherwise $A = A setminus B cup B$ would be finite. Now, $A setminus B$ (being infinite) is either denumerable or non - denumerable. Since $A setminus B subseteq A$ and $A$ is denumerable, $A setminus B$ cannot be non - denumerable (A subset cannot contain "more" elements than its superset). Hence, the only possibility is that $A setminus B$ is denumerable.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      You mean $A$ $B$ cannot be non-denumerable?
      $endgroup$
      – J. W. Tanner
      Mar 12 at 4:11













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144625%2fproving-that-if-a-set-a-is-denumerable-and-a-set-b-that-is-finite-and-a-subset-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Try this:



    We have that there exists a bijection $f:A to mathbb{N}$



    Then $g = f^{-1}:mathbb{N} to A$ is a bijection too



    And $B = {b_{1},...,b_{k}} subset A$



    So, we have that for every $n in mathbb{N}$, $g(n) = a_{n} in A$



    And $g(n_{i}) = b_{i}$ for some $n_{i}$ with $ 1 leq i leq k$



    And suppose that $n_{1}<n_{2}< dots <n_{k}$



    We are going to create a bijection $h:mathbb{N} to$ $A$ $B$



    Let $d in mathbb{N}cup{0}$, $d = n_{k} - k$



    We have a subset with $d$ elements ${1,2,...,n_{k}}$ ${n_{1},...n_{k}} = {c_{1},...,c_{d}}$



    Let $h(n) = g(c_{n})$ if $1 leq n leq d$, and $h(n) = g(n + k)$ if $n>d$



    Then $h$ define a bijection between $mathbb{N}$ and $A$ $B$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Try this:



      We have that there exists a bijection $f:A to mathbb{N}$



      Then $g = f^{-1}:mathbb{N} to A$ is a bijection too



      And $B = {b_{1},...,b_{k}} subset A$



      So, we have that for every $n in mathbb{N}$, $g(n) = a_{n} in A$



      And $g(n_{i}) = b_{i}$ for some $n_{i}$ with $ 1 leq i leq k$



      And suppose that $n_{1}<n_{2}< dots <n_{k}$



      We are going to create a bijection $h:mathbb{N} to$ $A$ $B$



      Let $d in mathbb{N}cup{0}$, $d = n_{k} - k$



      We have a subset with $d$ elements ${1,2,...,n_{k}}$ ${n_{1},...n_{k}} = {c_{1},...,c_{d}}$



      Let $h(n) = g(c_{n})$ if $1 leq n leq d$, and $h(n) = g(n + k)$ if $n>d$



      Then $h$ define a bijection between $mathbb{N}$ and $A$ $B$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Try this:



        We have that there exists a bijection $f:A to mathbb{N}$



        Then $g = f^{-1}:mathbb{N} to A$ is a bijection too



        And $B = {b_{1},...,b_{k}} subset A$



        So, we have that for every $n in mathbb{N}$, $g(n) = a_{n} in A$



        And $g(n_{i}) = b_{i}$ for some $n_{i}$ with $ 1 leq i leq k$



        And suppose that $n_{1}<n_{2}< dots <n_{k}$



        We are going to create a bijection $h:mathbb{N} to$ $A$ $B$



        Let $d in mathbb{N}cup{0}$, $d = n_{k} - k$



        We have a subset with $d$ elements ${1,2,...,n_{k}}$ ${n_{1},...n_{k}} = {c_{1},...,c_{d}}$



        Let $h(n) = g(c_{n})$ if $1 leq n leq d$, and $h(n) = g(n + k)$ if $n>d$



        Then $h$ define a bijection between $mathbb{N}$ and $A$ $B$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Try this:



        We have that there exists a bijection $f:A to mathbb{N}$



        Then $g = f^{-1}:mathbb{N} to A$ is a bijection too



        And $B = {b_{1},...,b_{k}} subset A$



        So, we have that for every $n in mathbb{N}$, $g(n) = a_{n} in A$



        And $g(n_{i}) = b_{i}$ for some $n_{i}$ with $ 1 leq i leq k$



        And suppose that $n_{1}<n_{2}< dots <n_{k}$



        We are going to create a bijection $h:mathbb{N} to$ $A$ $B$



        Let $d in mathbb{N}cup{0}$, $d = n_{k} - k$



        We have a subset with $d$ elements ${1,2,...,n_{k}}$ ${n_{1},...n_{k}} = {c_{1},...,c_{d}}$



        Let $h(n) = g(c_{n})$ if $1 leq n leq d$, and $h(n) = g(n + k)$ if $n>d$



        Then $h$ define a bijection between $mathbb{N}$ and $A$ $B$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 12 at 4:32









        ZAFZAF

        4607




        4607























            2












            $begingroup$

            First, we observe that $A setminus B$ is not finite, otherwise $A = A setminus B cup B$ would be finite. Now, $A setminus B$ (being infinite) is either denumerable or non - denumerable. Since $A setminus B subseteq A$ and $A$ is denumerable, $A setminus B$ cannot be non - denumerable (A subset cannot contain "more" elements than its superset). Hence, the only possibility is that $A setminus B$ is denumerable.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              You mean $A$ $B$ cannot be non-denumerable?
              $endgroup$
              – J. W. Tanner
              Mar 12 at 4:11


















            2












            $begingroup$

            First, we observe that $A setminus B$ is not finite, otherwise $A = A setminus B cup B$ would be finite. Now, $A setminus B$ (being infinite) is either denumerable or non - denumerable. Since $A setminus B subseteq A$ and $A$ is denumerable, $A setminus B$ cannot be non - denumerable (A subset cannot contain "more" elements than its superset). Hence, the only possibility is that $A setminus B$ is denumerable.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              You mean $A$ $B$ cannot be non-denumerable?
              $endgroup$
              – J. W. Tanner
              Mar 12 at 4:11
















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            First, we observe that $A setminus B$ is not finite, otherwise $A = A setminus B cup B$ would be finite. Now, $A setminus B$ (being infinite) is either denumerable or non - denumerable. Since $A setminus B subseteq A$ and $A$ is denumerable, $A setminus B$ cannot be non - denumerable (A subset cannot contain "more" elements than its superset). Hence, the only possibility is that $A setminus B$ is denumerable.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            First, we observe that $A setminus B$ is not finite, otherwise $A = A setminus B cup B$ would be finite. Now, $A setminus B$ (being infinite) is either denumerable or non - denumerable. Since $A setminus B subseteq A$ and $A$ is denumerable, $A setminus B$ cannot be non - denumerable (A subset cannot contain "more" elements than its superset). Hence, the only possibility is that $A setminus B$ is denumerable.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Mar 12 at 4:35

























            answered Mar 12 at 4:04









            Aniruddha DeshmukhAniruddha Deshmukh

            1,161419




            1,161419












            • $begingroup$
              You mean $A$ $B$ cannot be non-denumerable?
              $endgroup$
              – J. W. Tanner
              Mar 12 at 4:11




















            • $begingroup$
              You mean $A$ $B$ cannot be non-denumerable?
              $endgroup$
              – J. W. Tanner
              Mar 12 at 4:11


















            $begingroup$
            You mean $A$ $B$ cannot be non-denumerable?
            $endgroup$
            – J. W. Tanner
            Mar 12 at 4:11






            $begingroup$
            You mean $A$ $B$ cannot be non-denumerable?
            $endgroup$
            – J. W. Tanner
            Mar 12 at 4:11




















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144625%2fproving-that-if-a-set-a-is-denumerable-and-a-set-b-that-is-finite-and-a-subset-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Nidaros erkebispedøme

            Birsay

            Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...