Solve the equation $R^{2}frac{arccos(frac{h}{R})+frac{h}{R}}{2} = pi r^{2}$ for $R$Solving an equation with...

Commonest[] function doesn't actually show commonest elements

What is the purpose of a disclaimer like "this is not legal advice"?

Does the in-code argument passing conventions used on PDP-11's have a name?

An Undercover Army

Are mobile cities justifiable in sci-fi settings?

“I had a flat in the centre of town, but I didn’t like living there, so …”

Why would the IRS ask for birth certificates or even audit a small tax return?

Does it cost more to counter Sphinx of New Prahv?

How do you write a macro that takes arguments containing paragraphs?

Under what conditions would I NOT add my Proficiency Bonus to a Spell Attack Roll (or Saving Throw DC)?

Is this nominative case or accusative case?

Professor forcing me to attend a conference

Faulty RAID1 disk now shows as foreign

What is the meaning of option 'by' in TikZ Intersections

What is the oldest European royal house?

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

Can you run a ground wire from stove directly to ground pole in the ground

Is every open circuit a capacitor?

Giving a talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

ESPP--any reason not to go all in?

Are small insurances worth it

Is "cogitate" an appropriate word for this?

Who is at the mall?

If nine coins are tossed, what is the probability that the number of heads is even?



Solve the equation $R^{2}frac{arccos(frac{h}{R})+frac{h}{R}}{2} = pi r^{2}$ for $R$


Solving an equation with $arccos(x)$ and $sin(arccos(x))$Express $arcsin(x)$ in terms of $arccos(x)$. Solve the equation 2 arctan x=arcsin x + arccos xSolve Sum of ArccosSolve algebraically and graphically: $arcsin(x) + arccosleft(frac{x}{2}right) = frac{5pi}{6}$Express $arccos x+ arccos left(frac{x}{2} +frac{sqrt{3}-3x^2}{2}right)$ in simplest formHow to solve $c arccos(x)=x$ for the $x$?Solve trigonometric equation with $arcsin$ and $arccos$Solving $arccos(frac{x}{r}) + arccos(frac{x cdot d}{r}) = frac{pi}{n}$What is the solution to equation $arccosleft(frac{x-a}{x}right) - frac{a}{sqrt{2xa - a^2}} = 0$?Inverse trigonometric equations $arcsin left(1-xright)+arccos left(frac{1}{3}right)=frac{pi }{2}$













0












$begingroup$


I have the following equation and I want to solve for $R$.



$$R^{2} left( frac{arccos left(frac{h}{R}right) + frac{h}{R}}{2} right) = pi r^{2}$$










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Mariksel Azemaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    While not foolproof, usually if WolframAlpha doesn't return an answer, it's an indication that it may well not be possible without something rather elegant or convoluted. It seems to be the case here; you might have to resort to numerical approximation methods. (Wolfram: goo.gl/kwehDo)
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    yesterday


















0












$begingroup$


I have the following equation and I want to solve for $R$.



$$R^{2} left( frac{arccos left(frac{h}{R}right) + frac{h}{R}}{2} right) = pi r^{2}$$










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Mariksel Azemaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    While not foolproof, usually if WolframAlpha doesn't return an answer, it's an indication that it may well not be possible without something rather elegant or convoluted. It seems to be the case here; you might have to resort to numerical approximation methods. (Wolfram: goo.gl/kwehDo)
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    yesterday
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


I have the following equation and I want to solve for $R$.



$$R^{2} left( frac{arccos left(frac{h}{R}right) + frac{h}{R}}{2} right) = pi r^{2}$$










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Mariksel Azemaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I have the following equation and I want to solve for $R$.



$$R^{2} left( frac{arccos left(frac{h}{R}right) + frac{h}{R}}{2} right) = pi r^{2}$$







trigonometry circle quadratics factoring






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Mariksel Azemaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Mariksel Azemaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Rodrigo de Azevedo

13.1k41960




13.1k41960






New contributor




Mariksel Azemaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Mariksel AzemajMariksel Azemaj

103




103




New contributor




Mariksel Azemaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Mariksel Azemaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Mariksel Azemaj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    While not foolproof, usually if WolframAlpha doesn't return an answer, it's an indication that it may well not be possible without something rather elegant or convoluted. It seems to be the case here; you might have to resort to numerical approximation methods. (Wolfram: goo.gl/kwehDo)
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    yesterday
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    While not foolproof, usually if WolframAlpha doesn't return an answer, it's an indication that it may well not be possible without something rather elegant or convoluted. It seems to be the case here; you might have to resort to numerical approximation methods. (Wolfram: goo.gl/kwehDo)
    $endgroup$
    – Eevee Trainer
    yesterday










1




1




$begingroup$
While not foolproof, usually if WolframAlpha doesn't return an answer, it's an indication that it may well not be possible without something rather elegant or convoluted. It seems to be the case here; you might have to resort to numerical approximation methods. (Wolfram: goo.gl/kwehDo)
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
yesterday






$begingroup$
While not foolproof, usually if WolframAlpha doesn't return an answer, it's an indication that it may well not be possible without something rather elegant or convoluted. It seems to be the case here; you might have to resort to numerical approximation methods. (Wolfram: goo.gl/kwehDo)
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
yesterday












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

As said in comments, this is a transcendental equation and you cannot expect analytical solutions and then some numerical method would be required.



We can make the equation looking nicer using $R=frac h x$ and $a=frac{pi r^2}{h^2} $which makes
$$a x^2-x-cos ^{-1}(x)=0$$ and the solution is the intersetion of $f(x)=xcos ^{-1}(x)$ with $g(x)=ax^2$. There is only one solution to the equation provided $a geq 1$ and, for sure, the solution is in $[0,1]$.



For sure, if $a$ is large (that is to say $x$ small), you could use Taylor expansion to get
$$a x^2-x-cos ^{-1}(x)=frac{pi }{2}-a x^2-frac{x^3}{6}+Oleft(x^5right)$$ and ignoring the higher order terms solve either the quadratic equation giving as approximation $x=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ or even the cubic equation (but this would not be very pleasant).



So, for $ageq 1$, use Newton method with $x_0=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ for finding the zero of
$$f(x)=a x^2-x-cos ^{-1}(x)$$
$$f'(x)=2 a x+frac{1}{sqrt{1-x^2}}-1$$
$$x_{n+1}=x_n-frac{f(x_n)}{f'(x_n)}$$



Trying for $a=2$, this would give the following iterates
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
n & x_n \
0 & 0.88622693 \
1 & 0.84308752 \
2 & 0.84055714 \
3 & 0.84055001
end{array}
right)$$



We could have a better approximation of the guess building the $[2,k]$ Padé approximant of the function and solve the resulting quadratic. Using $k=2$, this would give as an estimate
$$x_0=frac{3 a left( sqrt{3pi(96 a^3-pi)}-piright)}{72 a^3-pi}$$ For $a=2$, this would give $0.856358$.



Another thing which could be done is to use series reversion and get
$$x=t-frac{t^4}{6 pi }-frac{3 t^6}{40 pi }+frac{5 t^7}{72 pi ^2}-frac{5 t^8}{112
pi }+frac{7 t^9}{80 pi ^2}-frac{left(128+105 pi ^2right) t^{10}}{3456 pi
^3}+frac{2067 t^{11}}{22400 pi ^2}-frac{left(704+189 pi ^2right)
t^{12}}{8448 pi ^3}+frac{11 left(98+407 pi ^2right) t^{13}}{48384 pi
^4}+Oleft(t^{14}right)$$
where $t=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ Applied again for $a=2$, this would give $0.841464$. Using this, I am sure that Newton method would converge in very few iterations.



In order to check the quality of the approximation, let us give $x$ a value; from $x$, compute $a=frac{x+cos ^{-1}(x) } {x^2}$ then $t=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ and recompute $x$ according to the last expansion. Below are rproduced some values
$$left(
begin{array}{ccc}
x_{text{given}} & a & x_{text{calculated}} \
0.05 & 628.310 & 0.0500000000 \
0.10 & 157.063 & 0.1000000000 \
0.15 & 69.7879 & 0.1500000000 \
0.20 & 39.2360 & 0.2000000000 \
0.25 & 25.0899 & 0.2500000000 \
0.30 & 17.4012 & 0.3000000004 \
0.35 & 12.7610 & 0.3500000031 \
0.40 & 9.74550 & 0.4000000194 \
0.45 & 7.67423 & 0.4500000998 \
0.50 & 6.18879 & 0.5000004337 \
0.55 & 5.08573 & 0.5500016534 \
0.60 & 4.24249 & 0.6000056758 \
0.65 & 3.58157 & 0.6500179206 \
0.70 & 3.05183 & 0.7000529960 \
0.75 & 2.61819 & 0.7501492859 \
0.80 & 2.25547 & 0.8004077547 \
0.85 & 1.94438 & 0.8511043677 \
0.90 & 1.66793 & 0.9030757253 \
0.95 & 1.40450 & 0.9596060077
end{array}
right)$$



A problem remains when $a$ is close to $1$. For that case, we can perform the Taylor expansion around $x=1$ to get
$$a=1+sqrt{2} sqrt{1-x}+(1-x)+Oleft((x-1)^{3/2}right)implies x=1-a+sqrt{2 a-1}$$



Edit



Since I suppose that you would like accurate results, you will be using Newton method.



Using a quick and dirty non linear regression $(R^2=0.999997)$, you could use for the wole range
$$x_0=left(sqrt{frac pi {2a}} right)-frac{117}{1426}left(sqrt{frac pi {2a}} right)^5$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Mariksel Azemaj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3137326%2fsolve-the-equation-r2-frac-arccos-frachr-frachr2-pi-r2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    As said in comments, this is a transcendental equation and you cannot expect analytical solutions and then some numerical method would be required.



    We can make the equation looking nicer using $R=frac h x$ and $a=frac{pi r^2}{h^2} $which makes
    $$a x^2-x-cos ^{-1}(x)=0$$ and the solution is the intersetion of $f(x)=xcos ^{-1}(x)$ with $g(x)=ax^2$. There is only one solution to the equation provided $a geq 1$ and, for sure, the solution is in $[0,1]$.



    For sure, if $a$ is large (that is to say $x$ small), you could use Taylor expansion to get
    $$a x^2-x-cos ^{-1}(x)=frac{pi }{2}-a x^2-frac{x^3}{6}+Oleft(x^5right)$$ and ignoring the higher order terms solve either the quadratic equation giving as approximation $x=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ or even the cubic equation (but this would not be very pleasant).



    So, for $ageq 1$, use Newton method with $x_0=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ for finding the zero of
    $$f(x)=a x^2-x-cos ^{-1}(x)$$
    $$f'(x)=2 a x+frac{1}{sqrt{1-x^2}}-1$$
    $$x_{n+1}=x_n-frac{f(x_n)}{f'(x_n)}$$



    Trying for $a=2$, this would give the following iterates
    $$left(
    begin{array}{cc}
    n & x_n \
    0 & 0.88622693 \
    1 & 0.84308752 \
    2 & 0.84055714 \
    3 & 0.84055001
    end{array}
    right)$$



    We could have a better approximation of the guess building the $[2,k]$ Padé approximant of the function and solve the resulting quadratic. Using $k=2$, this would give as an estimate
    $$x_0=frac{3 a left( sqrt{3pi(96 a^3-pi)}-piright)}{72 a^3-pi}$$ For $a=2$, this would give $0.856358$.



    Another thing which could be done is to use series reversion and get
    $$x=t-frac{t^4}{6 pi }-frac{3 t^6}{40 pi }+frac{5 t^7}{72 pi ^2}-frac{5 t^8}{112
    pi }+frac{7 t^9}{80 pi ^2}-frac{left(128+105 pi ^2right) t^{10}}{3456 pi
    ^3}+frac{2067 t^{11}}{22400 pi ^2}-frac{left(704+189 pi ^2right)
    t^{12}}{8448 pi ^3}+frac{11 left(98+407 pi ^2right) t^{13}}{48384 pi
    ^4}+Oleft(t^{14}right)$$
    where $t=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ Applied again for $a=2$, this would give $0.841464$. Using this, I am sure that Newton method would converge in very few iterations.



    In order to check the quality of the approximation, let us give $x$ a value; from $x$, compute $a=frac{x+cos ^{-1}(x) } {x^2}$ then $t=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ and recompute $x$ according to the last expansion. Below are rproduced some values
    $$left(
    begin{array}{ccc}
    x_{text{given}} & a & x_{text{calculated}} \
    0.05 & 628.310 & 0.0500000000 \
    0.10 & 157.063 & 0.1000000000 \
    0.15 & 69.7879 & 0.1500000000 \
    0.20 & 39.2360 & 0.2000000000 \
    0.25 & 25.0899 & 0.2500000000 \
    0.30 & 17.4012 & 0.3000000004 \
    0.35 & 12.7610 & 0.3500000031 \
    0.40 & 9.74550 & 0.4000000194 \
    0.45 & 7.67423 & 0.4500000998 \
    0.50 & 6.18879 & 0.5000004337 \
    0.55 & 5.08573 & 0.5500016534 \
    0.60 & 4.24249 & 0.6000056758 \
    0.65 & 3.58157 & 0.6500179206 \
    0.70 & 3.05183 & 0.7000529960 \
    0.75 & 2.61819 & 0.7501492859 \
    0.80 & 2.25547 & 0.8004077547 \
    0.85 & 1.94438 & 0.8511043677 \
    0.90 & 1.66793 & 0.9030757253 \
    0.95 & 1.40450 & 0.9596060077
    end{array}
    right)$$



    A problem remains when $a$ is close to $1$. For that case, we can perform the Taylor expansion around $x=1$ to get
    $$a=1+sqrt{2} sqrt{1-x}+(1-x)+Oleft((x-1)^{3/2}right)implies x=1-a+sqrt{2 a-1}$$



    Edit



    Since I suppose that you would like accurate results, you will be using Newton method.



    Using a quick and dirty non linear regression $(R^2=0.999997)$, you could use for the wole range
    $$x_0=left(sqrt{frac pi {2a}} right)-frac{117}{1426}left(sqrt{frac pi {2a}} right)^5$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      As said in comments, this is a transcendental equation and you cannot expect analytical solutions and then some numerical method would be required.



      We can make the equation looking nicer using $R=frac h x$ and $a=frac{pi r^2}{h^2} $which makes
      $$a x^2-x-cos ^{-1}(x)=0$$ and the solution is the intersetion of $f(x)=xcos ^{-1}(x)$ with $g(x)=ax^2$. There is only one solution to the equation provided $a geq 1$ and, for sure, the solution is in $[0,1]$.



      For sure, if $a$ is large (that is to say $x$ small), you could use Taylor expansion to get
      $$a x^2-x-cos ^{-1}(x)=frac{pi }{2}-a x^2-frac{x^3}{6}+Oleft(x^5right)$$ and ignoring the higher order terms solve either the quadratic equation giving as approximation $x=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ or even the cubic equation (but this would not be very pleasant).



      So, for $ageq 1$, use Newton method with $x_0=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ for finding the zero of
      $$f(x)=a x^2-x-cos ^{-1}(x)$$
      $$f'(x)=2 a x+frac{1}{sqrt{1-x^2}}-1$$
      $$x_{n+1}=x_n-frac{f(x_n)}{f'(x_n)}$$



      Trying for $a=2$, this would give the following iterates
      $$left(
      begin{array}{cc}
      n & x_n \
      0 & 0.88622693 \
      1 & 0.84308752 \
      2 & 0.84055714 \
      3 & 0.84055001
      end{array}
      right)$$



      We could have a better approximation of the guess building the $[2,k]$ Padé approximant of the function and solve the resulting quadratic. Using $k=2$, this would give as an estimate
      $$x_0=frac{3 a left( sqrt{3pi(96 a^3-pi)}-piright)}{72 a^3-pi}$$ For $a=2$, this would give $0.856358$.



      Another thing which could be done is to use series reversion and get
      $$x=t-frac{t^4}{6 pi }-frac{3 t^6}{40 pi }+frac{5 t^7}{72 pi ^2}-frac{5 t^8}{112
      pi }+frac{7 t^9}{80 pi ^2}-frac{left(128+105 pi ^2right) t^{10}}{3456 pi
      ^3}+frac{2067 t^{11}}{22400 pi ^2}-frac{left(704+189 pi ^2right)
      t^{12}}{8448 pi ^3}+frac{11 left(98+407 pi ^2right) t^{13}}{48384 pi
      ^4}+Oleft(t^{14}right)$$
      where $t=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ Applied again for $a=2$, this would give $0.841464$. Using this, I am sure that Newton method would converge in very few iterations.



      In order to check the quality of the approximation, let us give $x$ a value; from $x$, compute $a=frac{x+cos ^{-1}(x) } {x^2}$ then $t=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ and recompute $x$ according to the last expansion. Below are rproduced some values
      $$left(
      begin{array}{ccc}
      x_{text{given}} & a & x_{text{calculated}} \
      0.05 & 628.310 & 0.0500000000 \
      0.10 & 157.063 & 0.1000000000 \
      0.15 & 69.7879 & 0.1500000000 \
      0.20 & 39.2360 & 0.2000000000 \
      0.25 & 25.0899 & 0.2500000000 \
      0.30 & 17.4012 & 0.3000000004 \
      0.35 & 12.7610 & 0.3500000031 \
      0.40 & 9.74550 & 0.4000000194 \
      0.45 & 7.67423 & 0.4500000998 \
      0.50 & 6.18879 & 0.5000004337 \
      0.55 & 5.08573 & 0.5500016534 \
      0.60 & 4.24249 & 0.6000056758 \
      0.65 & 3.58157 & 0.6500179206 \
      0.70 & 3.05183 & 0.7000529960 \
      0.75 & 2.61819 & 0.7501492859 \
      0.80 & 2.25547 & 0.8004077547 \
      0.85 & 1.94438 & 0.8511043677 \
      0.90 & 1.66793 & 0.9030757253 \
      0.95 & 1.40450 & 0.9596060077
      end{array}
      right)$$



      A problem remains when $a$ is close to $1$. For that case, we can perform the Taylor expansion around $x=1$ to get
      $$a=1+sqrt{2} sqrt{1-x}+(1-x)+Oleft((x-1)^{3/2}right)implies x=1-a+sqrt{2 a-1}$$



      Edit



      Since I suppose that you would like accurate results, you will be using Newton method.



      Using a quick and dirty non linear regression $(R^2=0.999997)$, you could use for the wole range
      $$x_0=left(sqrt{frac pi {2a}} right)-frac{117}{1426}left(sqrt{frac pi {2a}} right)^5$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        As said in comments, this is a transcendental equation and you cannot expect analytical solutions and then some numerical method would be required.



        We can make the equation looking nicer using $R=frac h x$ and $a=frac{pi r^2}{h^2} $which makes
        $$a x^2-x-cos ^{-1}(x)=0$$ and the solution is the intersetion of $f(x)=xcos ^{-1}(x)$ with $g(x)=ax^2$. There is only one solution to the equation provided $a geq 1$ and, for sure, the solution is in $[0,1]$.



        For sure, if $a$ is large (that is to say $x$ small), you could use Taylor expansion to get
        $$a x^2-x-cos ^{-1}(x)=frac{pi }{2}-a x^2-frac{x^3}{6}+Oleft(x^5right)$$ and ignoring the higher order terms solve either the quadratic equation giving as approximation $x=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ or even the cubic equation (but this would not be very pleasant).



        So, for $ageq 1$, use Newton method with $x_0=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ for finding the zero of
        $$f(x)=a x^2-x-cos ^{-1}(x)$$
        $$f'(x)=2 a x+frac{1}{sqrt{1-x^2}}-1$$
        $$x_{n+1}=x_n-frac{f(x_n)}{f'(x_n)}$$



        Trying for $a=2$, this would give the following iterates
        $$left(
        begin{array}{cc}
        n & x_n \
        0 & 0.88622693 \
        1 & 0.84308752 \
        2 & 0.84055714 \
        3 & 0.84055001
        end{array}
        right)$$



        We could have a better approximation of the guess building the $[2,k]$ Padé approximant of the function and solve the resulting quadratic. Using $k=2$, this would give as an estimate
        $$x_0=frac{3 a left( sqrt{3pi(96 a^3-pi)}-piright)}{72 a^3-pi}$$ For $a=2$, this would give $0.856358$.



        Another thing which could be done is to use series reversion and get
        $$x=t-frac{t^4}{6 pi }-frac{3 t^6}{40 pi }+frac{5 t^7}{72 pi ^2}-frac{5 t^8}{112
        pi }+frac{7 t^9}{80 pi ^2}-frac{left(128+105 pi ^2right) t^{10}}{3456 pi
        ^3}+frac{2067 t^{11}}{22400 pi ^2}-frac{left(704+189 pi ^2right)
        t^{12}}{8448 pi ^3}+frac{11 left(98+407 pi ^2right) t^{13}}{48384 pi
        ^4}+Oleft(t^{14}right)$$
        where $t=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ Applied again for $a=2$, this would give $0.841464$. Using this, I am sure that Newton method would converge in very few iterations.



        In order to check the quality of the approximation, let us give $x$ a value; from $x$, compute $a=frac{x+cos ^{-1}(x) } {x^2}$ then $t=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ and recompute $x$ according to the last expansion. Below are rproduced some values
        $$left(
        begin{array}{ccc}
        x_{text{given}} & a & x_{text{calculated}} \
        0.05 & 628.310 & 0.0500000000 \
        0.10 & 157.063 & 0.1000000000 \
        0.15 & 69.7879 & 0.1500000000 \
        0.20 & 39.2360 & 0.2000000000 \
        0.25 & 25.0899 & 0.2500000000 \
        0.30 & 17.4012 & 0.3000000004 \
        0.35 & 12.7610 & 0.3500000031 \
        0.40 & 9.74550 & 0.4000000194 \
        0.45 & 7.67423 & 0.4500000998 \
        0.50 & 6.18879 & 0.5000004337 \
        0.55 & 5.08573 & 0.5500016534 \
        0.60 & 4.24249 & 0.6000056758 \
        0.65 & 3.58157 & 0.6500179206 \
        0.70 & 3.05183 & 0.7000529960 \
        0.75 & 2.61819 & 0.7501492859 \
        0.80 & 2.25547 & 0.8004077547 \
        0.85 & 1.94438 & 0.8511043677 \
        0.90 & 1.66793 & 0.9030757253 \
        0.95 & 1.40450 & 0.9596060077
        end{array}
        right)$$



        A problem remains when $a$ is close to $1$. For that case, we can perform the Taylor expansion around $x=1$ to get
        $$a=1+sqrt{2} sqrt{1-x}+(1-x)+Oleft((x-1)^{3/2}right)implies x=1-a+sqrt{2 a-1}$$



        Edit



        Since I suppose that you would like accurate results, you will be using Newton method.



        Using a quick and dirty non linear regression $(R^2=0.999997)$, you could use for the wole range
        $$x_0=left(sqrt{frac pi {2a}} right)-frac{117}{1426}left(sqrt{frac pi {2a}} right)^5$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        As said in comments, this is a transcendental equation and you cannot expect analytical solutions and then some numerical method would be required.



        We can make the equation looking nicer using $R=frac h x$ and $a=frac{pi r^2}{h^2} $which makes
        $$a x^2-x-cos ^{-1}(x)=0$$ and the solution is the intersetion of $f(x)=xcos ^{-1}(x)$ with $g(x)=ax^2$. There is only one solution to the equation provided $a geq 1$ and, for sure, the solution is in $[0,1]$.



        For sure, if $a$ is large (that is to say $x$ small), you could use Taylor expansion to get
        $$a x^2-x-cos ^{-1}(x)=frac{pi }{2}-a x^2-frac{x^3}{6}+Oleft(x^5right)$$ and ignoring the higher order terms solve either the quadratic equation giving as approximation $x=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ or even the cubic equation (but this would not be very pleasant).



        So, for $ageq 1$, use Newton method with $x_0=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ for finding the zero of
        $$f(x)=a x^2-x-cos ^{-1}(x)$$
        $$f'(x)=2 a x+frac{1}{sqrt{1-x^2}}-1$$
        $$x_{n+1}=x_n-frac{f(x_n)}{f'(x_n)}$$



        Trying for $a=2$, this would give the following iterates
        $$left(
        begin{array}{cc}
        n & x_n \
        0 & 0.88622693 \
        1 & 0.84308752 \
        2 & 0.84055714 \
        3 & 0.84055001
        end{array}
        right)$$



        We could have a better approximation of the guess building the $[2,k]$ Padé approximant of the function and solve the resulting quadratic. Using $k=2$, this would give as an estimate
        $$x_0=frac{3 a left( sqrt{3pi(96 a^3-pi)}-piright)}{72 a^3-pi}$$ For $a=2$, this would give $0.856358$.



        Another thing which could be done is to use series reversion and get
        $$x=t-frac{t^4}{6 pi }-frac{3 t^6}{40 pi }+frac{5 t^7}{72 pi ^2}-frac{5 t^8}{112
        pi }+frac{7 t^9}{80 pi ^2}-frac{left(128+105 pi ^2right) t^{10}}{3456 pi
        ^3}+frac{2067 t^{11}}{22400 pi ^2}-frac{left(704+189 pi ^2right)
        t^{12}}{8448 pi ^3}+frac{11 left(98+407 pi ^2right) t^{13}}{48384 pi
        ^4}+Oleft(t^{14}right)$$
        where $t=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ Applied again for $a=2$, this would give $0.841464$. Using this, I am sure that Newton method would converge in very few iterations.



        In order to check the quality of the approximation, let us give $x$ a value; from $x$, compute $a=frac{x+cos ^{-1}(x) } {x^2}$ then $t=sqrt{frac pi {2a}}$ and recompute $x$ according to the last expansion. Below are rproduced some values
        $$left(
        begin{array}{ccc}
        x_{text{given}} & a & x_{text{calculated}} \
        0.05 & 628.310 & 0.0500000000 \
        0.10 & 157.063 & 0.1000000000 \
        0.15 & 69.7879 & 0.1500000000 \
        0.20 & 39.2360 & 0.2000000000 \
        0.25 & 25.0899 & 0.2500000000 \
        0.30 & 17.4012 & 0.3000000004 \
        0.35 & 12.7610 & 0.3500000031 \
        0.40 & 9.74550 & 0.4000000194 \
        0.45 & 7.67423 & 0.4500000998 \
        0.50 & 6.18879 & 0.5000004337 \
        0.55 & 5.08573 & 0.5500016534 \
        0.60 & 4.24249 & 0.6000056758 \
        0.65 & 3.58157 & 0.6500179206 \
        0.70 & 3.05183 & 0.7000529960 \
        0.75 & 2.61819 & 0.7501492859 \
        0.80 & 2.25547 & 0.8004077547 \
        0.85 & 1.94438 & 0.8511043677 \
        0.90 & 1.66793 & 0.9030757253 \
        0.95 & 1.40450 & 0.9596060077
        end{array}
        right)$$



        A problem remains when $a$ is close to $1$. For that case, we can perform the Taylor expansion around $x=1$ to get
        $$a=1+sqrt{2} sqrt{1-x}+(1-x)+Oleft((x-1)^{3/2}right)implies x=1-a+sqrt{2 a-1}$$



        Edit



        Since I suppose that you would like accurate results, you will be using Newton method.



        Using a quick and dirty non linear regression $(R^2=0.999997)$, you could use for the wole range
        $$x_0=left(sqrt{frac pi {2a}} right)-frac{117}{1426}left(sqrt{frac pi {2a}} right)^5$$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 10 hours ago

























        answered yesterday









        Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici

        123k1157135




        123k1157135






















            Mariksel Azemaj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Mariksel Azemaj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Mariksel Azemaj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Mariksel Azemaj is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3137326%2fsolve-the-equation-r2-frac-arccos-frachr-frachr2-pi-r2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Nidaros erkebispedøme

            Birsay

            Was Woodrow Wilson really a Liberal?Was World War I a war of liberals against authoritarians?Founding Fathers...