Is there any way to test a moment generating function_ [closed] Announcing the arrival of...

Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?

Why can't I install Tomboy in Ubuntu Mate 19.04?

Does "shooting for effect" have contradictory meanings in different areas?

Drawing spherical mirrors

Converted a Scalar function to a TVF function for parallel execution-Still running in Serial mode

Is multiple magic items in one inherently imbalanced?

Flash light on something

Has negative voting ever been officially implemented in elections, or seriously proposed, or even studied?

Draw 4 of the same figure in the same tikzpicture

What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?

Why are my pictures showing a dark band on one edge?

Would it be easier to apply for a UK visa if there is a host family to sponsor for you in going there?

Project Euler #1 in C++

What is the chair depicted in Cesare Maccari's 1889 painting "Cicerone denuncia Catilina"?

What's the point of the test set?

Misunderstanding of Sylow theory

How often does castling occur in grandmaster games?

Crossing US/Canada Border for less than 24 hours

One-one communication

How could we fake a moon landing now?

Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?

Dyck paths with extra diagonals from valleys (Laser construction)

What makes a man succeed?

How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?



Is there any way to test a moment generating function_ [closed]



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Help with Moment Generating Function and ProbabilityProbability of a single variable from a Moment Generating FunctionCompute conditional expectation from moment generating functionObtaining the probability density function from moment generating functionMoment generating function of sum of independent random variablesMoment generating function of the product of two i.i.d. uniform random variablesCreating a mixed moment generating function from a Bernoulli random variable and a Uniform random variableDerivative of moment generating functionmoment-generating function for uniform discrete distributionMoment Generating Function from Piecewise Constant CDF?












1












$begingroup$


Like isnt there way to put the function value inside and then I would get the same value as the uniform probability function?



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Lee David Chung Lin, zz20s, Eevee Trainer, Thomas Shelby, Leucippus Mar 26 at 5:02


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Lee David Chung Lin, zz20s, Eevee Trainer, Leucippus

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.





















    1












    $begingroup$


    Like isnt there way to put the function value inside and then I would get the same value as the uniform probability function?



    enter image description here










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$



    closed as off-topic by Lee David Chung Lin, zz20s, Eevee Trainer, Thomas Shelby, Leucippus Mar 26 at 5:02


    This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


    • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Lee David Chung Lin, zz20s, Eevee Trainer, Leucippus

    If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.



















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Like isnt there way to put the function value inside and then I would get the same value as the uniform probability function?



      enter image description here










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Like isnt there way to put the function value inside and then I would get the same value as the uniform probability function?



      enter image description here







      probability moment-generating-functions






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 25 at 16:45









      Jane DoeJane Doe

      411




      411




      closed as off-topic by Lee David Chung Lin, zz20s, Eevee Trainer, Thomas Shelby, Leucippus Mar 26 at 5:02


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Lee David Chung Lin, zz20s, Eevee Trainer, Leucippus

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







      closed as off-topic by Lee David Chung Lin, zz20s, Eevee Trainer, Thomas Shelby, Leucippus Mar 26 at 5:02


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Lee David Chung Lin, zz20s, Eevee Trainer, Leucippus

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The mgf is given by
          $$
          M_X(t) = mathbb{E}left[e^{tX}right] = int_mathbb{R} e^{tx} f(x) dx,
          $$

          so $M_X(0) = 1$ and $$M_X'(0) = mathbb{E}[X]$$ which is a quick shortcut you can use to check things. In your case, $mathbb{E}[X] = 1/2$ by symmetry.



          But if you want a formal calculation, your way is correct, namely that
          $$
          M_X(t) = int_mathbb{R} e^{tx} f(x) dx = int_0^1e^{tx} dx = frac{e^t-1}{t}
          $$

          The above spot-check is easy to make since
          $$
          M_X'(t) = e^t t^{-1} - left(e^t-1right)t^{-2} = frac{(t-1)e^t+1}{t^2}
          $$

          and it's easy to see by L'Hospital's Rule (twice) that $M_X'(t) to 1/2$ as $t to 0$...






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            The mgf is given by
            $$
            M_X(t) = mathbb{E}left[e^{tX}right] = int_mathbb{R} e^{tx} f(x) dx,
            $$

            so $M_X(0) = 1$ and $$M_X'(0) = mathbb{E}[X]$$ which is a quick shortcut you can use to check things. In your case, $mathbb{E}[X] = 1/2$ by symmetry.



            But if you want a formal calculation, your way is correct, namely that
            $$
            M_X(t) = int_mathbb{R} e^{tx} f(x) dx = int_0^1e^{tx} dx = frac{e^t-1}{t}
            $$

            The above spot-check is easy to make since
            $$
            M_X'(t) = e^t t^{-1} - left(e^t-1right)t^{-2} = frac{(t-1)e^t+1}{t^2}
            $$

            and it's easy to see by L'Hospital's Rule (twice) that $M_X'(t) to 1/2$ as $t to 0$...






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              The mgf is given by
              $$
              M_X(t) = mathbb{E}left[e^{tX}right] = int_mathbb{R} e^{tx} f(x) dx,
              $$

              so $M_X(0) = 1$ and $$M_X'(0) = mathbb{E}[X]$$ which is a quick shortcut you can use to check things. In your case, $mathbb{E}[X] = 1/2$ by symmetry.



              But if you want a formal calculation, your way is correct, namely that
              $$
              M_X(t) = int_mathbb{R} e^{tx} f(x) dx = int_0^1e^{tx} dx = frac{e^t-1}{t}
              $$

              The above spot-check is easy to make since
              $$
              M_X'(t) = e^t t^{-1} - left(e^t-1right)t^{-2} = frac{(t-1)e^t+1}{t^2}
              $$

              and it's easy to see by L'Hospital's Rule (twice) that $M_X'(t) to 1/2$ as $t to 0$...






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                The mgf is given by
                $$
                M_X(t) = mathbb{E}left[e^{tX}right] = int_mathbb{R} e^{tx} f(x) dx,
                $$

                so $M_X(0) = 1$ and $$M_X'(0) = mathbb{E}[X]$$ which is a quick shortcut you can use to check things. In your case, $mathbb{E}[X] = 1/2$ by symmetry.



                But if you want a formal calculation, your way is correct, namely that
                $$
                M_X(t) = int_mathbb{R} e^{tx} f(x) dx = int_0^1e^{tx} dx = frac{e^t-1}{t}
                $$

                The above spot-check is easy to make since
                $$
                M_X'(t) = e^t t^{-1} - left(e^t-1right)t^{-2} = frac{(t-1)e^t+1}{t^2}
                $$

                and it's easy to see by L'Hospital's Rule (twice) that $M_X'(t) to 1/2$ as $t to 0$...






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The mgf is given by
                $$
                M_X(t) = mathbb{E}left[e^{tX}right] = int_mathbb{R} e^{tx} f(x) dx,
                $$

                so $M_X(0) = 1$ and $$M_X'(0) = mathbb{E}[X]$$ which is a quick shortcut you can use to check things. In your case, $mathbb{E}[X] = 1/2$ by symmetry.



                But if you want a formal calculation, your way is correct, namely that
                $$
                M_X(t) = int_mathbb{R} e^{tx} f(x) dx = int_0^1e^{tx} dx = frac{e^t-1}{t}
                $$

                The above spot-check is easy to make since
                $$
                M_X'(t) = e^t t^{-1} - left(e^t-1right)t^{-2} = frac{(t-1)e^t+1}{t^2}
                $$

                and it's easy to see by L'Hospital's Rule (twice) that $M_X'(t) to 1/2$ as $t to 0$...







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 25 at 17:13









                gt6989bgt6989b

                36k22557




                36k22557















                    Popular posts from this blog

                    六本木駅

                    Integral that is continuous and looks like it converges to a geometric seriesTesting if a geometric series converges by taking limit to infinitySummation of arithmetic-geometric series of higher orderGeometric series with polynomial exponentHow to Recognize a Geometric SeriesShowing an integral equality with series over the integersDiscontinuity of a series of continuous functionsReasons why a Series ConvergesSum of infinite geometric series with two terms in summationUsing geometric series for computing IntegralsLimit of geometric series sum when $r = 1$

                    Joseph Lister