“on average” in the Bombieri-Vinogradov theorem Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate...

A letter with no particular backstory

What does it mean that physics no longer uses mechanical models to describe phenomena?

Has negative voting ever been officially implemented in elections, or seriously proposed, or even studied?

Draw 4 of the same figure in the same tikzpicture

How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?

Is CEO the "profession" with the most psychopaths?

What does this say in Elvish?

What is the difference between a "ranged attack" and a "ranged weapon attack"?

What makes a man succeed?

How many morphisms from 1 to 1+1 can there be?

Intuitive explanation of the rank-nullity theorem

Converted a Scalar function to a TVF function for parallel execution-Still running in Serial mode

What is the chair depicted in Cesare Maccari's 1889 painting "Cicerone denuncia Catilina"?

Significance of Cersei's obsession with elephants?

Did Mueller's report provide an evidentiary basis for the claim of Russian govt election interference via social media?

Should a wizard buy fine inks every time he want to copy spells into his spellbook?

Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?

Random body shuffle every night—can we still function?

In musical terms, what properties are varied by the human voice to produce different words / syllables?

Lagrange four-squares theorem --- deterministic complexity

Is the IBM 5153 color display compatible with the Tandy 1000 16 color modes?

Electrolysis of water: Which equations to use? (IB Chem)

preposition before coffee

How many time has Arya actually used Needle?



“on average” in the Bombieri-Vinogradov theorem



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Farey fractions in arithmetic progressionProving that Bombieri's Theorem implies Linnik's theoremProving equivalences between prime counting functions.Asymptotic expression for $3$ term arithmetic progression in the primesEquidistribution estimates after ZhangAverage prime value in n factorial.How to relate the two versions of Bombieri-Vinogradov theorem to one another?More precise version of Mertens theoremHow correct an estimate for twin primes obtained from the Rosser-Iwaniec sieve and Prime number theorem for arithmetic progressions could be?Portion of prime congruent to $a$ mod $m$ in the factorial of $n$












0












$begingroup$


TLDR: I don't understand the bit in bold, i.e. where in the formula is the average q? Thanks.



The Bombieri-Vinogradov theorem states the following:



For any $A > 0$ there exists a $B = B(A)$ such that, for $Q= N^{frac{1}{2}}(log N)^{-B}$



$$sum_{q leq Q}max_{substack{a}\{(a,q)=1}}|psi(N;q,a) - frac{N}{varphi(q)}| ll_{A} frac{N}{(log N)^{A}} $$



where $$psi(N;q,a) = sum_{substack{n leq N}\ n equiv a mod q}log n$$



if $n$ is a prime, and $0$ otherwise.



From my understanding, verbally this is addressing the error term of primes in arithmetic progression, for $bf{q leq Q}$ on average










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The true statement is on wiki. It has an equivalent formulation in term of $psi(N,chi) = sum_{p^k le N} chi(p^k) log p$ and the result follows from the orthogonality of characters
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Mar 25 at 18:33










  • $begingroup$
    @reuns I've looked at the wiki link and am still a bit confused.What is $y$ in the wiki formula? Also how does one arrive at the inequality for $Q$ i.e. $x^{frac{1}{2}}log^{-A}x leq Q leq x^{frac{1}{2}}$ finally do you have a reference to the equivalent formulation you gave? Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – numbertheorylearner
    Mar 26 at 18:38










  • $begingroup$
    @reuns I looked into it more. I see we can write $$psi(x;q,a) = frac{1}{varphi(q)}sum_{chi in X_{q}}bar{chi}(a)psi(x, chi)$$ and we can approximate $psi(x, chi)$ by an integral. So we are averaging over q. The difference in Bomberi Vinogadov is essentially the error term right?
    $endgroup$
    – numbertheorylearner
    Mar 26 at 19:51
















0












$begingroup$


TLDR: I don't understand the bit in bold, i.e. where in the formula is the average q? Thanks.



The Bombieri-Vinogradov theorem states the following:



For any $A > 0$ there exists a $B = B(A)$ such that, for $Q= N^{frac{1}{2}}(log N)^{-B}$



$$sum_{q leq Q}max_{substack{a}\{(a,q)=1}}|psi(N;q,a) - frac{N}{varphi(q)}| ll_{A} frac{N}{(log N)^{A}} $$



where $$psi(N;q,a) = sum_{substack{n leq N}\ n equiv a mod q}log n$$



if $n$ is a prime, and $0$ otherwise.



From my understanding, verbally this is addressing the error term of primes in arithmetic progression, for $bf{q leq Q}$ on average










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The true statement is on wiki. It has an equivalent formulation in term of $psi(N,chi) = sum_{p^k le N} chi(p^k) log p$ and the result follows from the orthogonality of characters
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Mar 25 at 18:33










  • $begingroup$
    @reuns I've looked at the wiki link and am still a bit confused.What is $y$ in the wiki formula? Also how does one arrive at the inequality for $Q$ i.e. $x^{frac{1}{2}}log^{-A}x leq Q leq x^{frac{1}{2}}$ finally do you have a reference to the equivalent formulation you gave? Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – numbertheorylearner
    Mar 26 at 18:38










  • $begingroup$
    @reuns I looked into it more. I see we can write $$psi(x;q,a) = frac{1}{varphi(q)}sum_{chi in X_{q}}bar{chi}(a)psi(x, chi)$$ and we can approximate $psi(x, chi)$ by an integral. So we are averaging over q. The difference in Bomberi Vinogadov is essentially the error term right?
    $endgroup$
    – numbertheorylearner
    Mar 26 at 19:51














0












0








0





$begingroup$


TLDR: I don't understand the bit in bold, i.e. where in the formula is the average q? Thanks.



The Bombieri-Vinogradov theorem states the following:



For any $A > 0$ there exists a $B = B(A)$ such that, for $Q= N^{frac{1}{2}}(log N)^{-B}$



$$sum_{q leq Q}max_{substack{a}\{(a,q)=1}}|psi(N;q,a) - frac{N}{varphi(q)}| ll_{A} frac{N}{(log N)^{A}} $$



where $$psi(N;q,a) = sum_{substack{n leq N}\ n equiv a mod q}log n$$



if $n$ is a prime, and $0$ otherwise.



From my understanding, verbally this is addressing the error term of primes in arithmetic progression, for $bf{q leq Q}$ on average










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




TLDR: I don't understand the bit in bold, i.e. where in the formula is the average q? Thanks.



The Bombieri-Vinogradov theorem states the following:



For any $A > 0$ there exists a $B = B(A)$ such that, for $Q= N^{frac{1}{2}}(log N)^{-B}$



$$sum_{q leq Q}max_{substack{a}\{(a,q)=1}}|psi(N;q,a) - frac{N}{varphi(q)}| ll_{A} frac{N}{(log N)^{A}} $$



where $$psi(N;q,a) = sum_{substack{n leq N}\ n equiv a mod q}log n$$



if $n$ is a prime, and $0$ otherwise.



From my understanding, verbally this is addressing the error term of primes in arithmetic progression, for $bf{q leq Q}$ on average







prime-numbers analytic-number-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 25 at 16:44









numbertheorylearnernumbertheorylearner

11




11












  • $begingroup$
    The true statement is on wiki. It has an equivalent formulation in term of $psi(N,chi) = sum_{p^k le N} chi(p^k) log p$ and the result follows from the orthogonality of characters
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Mar 25 at 18:33










  • $begingroup$
    @reuns I've looked at the wiki link and am still a bit confused.What is $y$ in the wiki formula? Also how does one arrive at the inequality for $Q$ i.e. $x^{frac{1}{2}}log^{-A}x leq Q leq x^{frac{1}{2}}$ finally do you have a reference to the equivalent formulation you gave? Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – numbertheorylearner
    Mar 26 at 18:38










  • $begingroup$
    @reuns I looked into it more. I see we can write $$psi(x;q,a) = frac{1}{varphi(q)}sum_{chi in X_{q}}bar{chi}(a)psi(x, chi)$$ and we can approximate $psi(x, chi)$ by an integral. So we are averaging over q. The difference in Bomberi Vinogadov is essentially the error term right?
    $endgroup$
    – numbertheorylearner
    Mar 26 at 19:51


















  • $begingroup$
    The true statement is on wiki. It has an equivalent formulation in term of $psi(N,chi) = sum_{p^k le N} chi(p^k) log p$ and the result follows from the orthogonality of characters
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Mar 25 at 18:33










  • $begingroup$
    @reuns I've looked at the wiki link and am still a bit confused.What is $y$ in the wiki formula? Also how does one arrive at the inequality for $Q$ i.e. $x^{frac{1}{2}}log^{-A}x leq Q leq x^{frac{1}{2}}$ finally do you have a reference to the equivalent formulation you gave? Thanks.
    $endgroup$
    – numbertheorylearner
    Mar 26 at 18:38










  • $begingroup$
    @reuns I looked into it more. I see we can write $$psi(x;q,a) = frac{1}{varphi(q)}sum_{chi in X_{q}}bar{chi}(a)psi(x, chi)$$ and we can approximate $psi(x, chi)$ by an integral. So we are averaging over q. The difference in Bomberi Vinogadov is essentially the error term right?
    $endgroup$
    – numbertheorylearner
    Mar 26 at 19:51
















$begingroup$
The true statement is on wiki. It has an equivalent formulation in term of $psi(N,chi) = sum_{p^k le N} chi(p^k) log p$ and the result follows from the orthogonality of characters
$endgroup$
– reuns
Mar 25 at 18:33




$begingroup$
The true statement is on wiki. It has an equivalent formulation in term of $psi(N,chi) = sum_{p^k le N} chi(p^k) log p$ and the result follows from the orthogonality of characters
$endgroup$
– reuns
Mar 25 at 18:33












$begingroup$
@reuns I've looked at the wiki link and am still a bit confused.What is $y$ in the wiki formula? Also how does one arrive at the inequality for $Q$ i.e. $x^{frac{1}{2}}log^{-A}x leq Q leq x^{frac{1}{2}}$ finally do you have a reference to the equivalent formulation you gave? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– numbertheorylearner
Mar 26 at 18:38




$begingroup$
@reuns I've looked at the wiki link and am still a bit confused.What is $y$ in the wiki formula? Also how does one arrive at the inequality for $Q$ i.e. $x^{frac{1}{2}}log^{-A}x leq Q leq x^{frac{1}{2}}$ finally do you have a reference to the equivalent formulation you gave? Thanks.
$endgroup$
– numbertheorylearner
Mar 26 at 18:38












$begingroup$
@reuns I looked into it more. I see we can write $$psi(x;q,a) = frac{1}{varphi(q)}sum_{chi in X_{q}}bar{chi}(a)psi(x, chi)$$ and we can approximate $psi(x, chi)$ by an integral. So we are averaging over q. The difference in Bomberi Vinogadov is essentially the error term right?
$endgroup$
– numbertheorylearner
Mar 26 at 19:51




$begingroup$
@reuns I looked into it more. I see we can write $$psi(x;q,a) = frac{1}{varphi(q)}sum_{chi in X_{q}}bar{chi}(a)psi(x, chi)$$ and we can approximate $psi(x, chi)$ by an integral. So we are averaging over q. The difference in Bomberi Vinogadov is essentially the error term right?
$endgroup$
– numbertheorylearner
Mar 26 at 19:51










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3162039%2fon-average-in-the-bombieri-vinogradov-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3162039%2fon-average-in-the-bombieri-vinogradov-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

六本木駅

Integral that is continuous and looks like it converges to a geometric seriesTesting if a geometric series converges by taking limit to infinitySummation of arithmetic-geometric series of higher orderGeometric series with polynomial exponentHow to Recognize a Geometric SeriesShowing an integral equality with series over the integersDiscontinuity of a series of continuous functionsReasons why a Series ConvergesSum of infinite geometric series with two terms in summationUsing geometric series for computing IntegralsLimit of geometric series sum when $r = 1$

Joseph Lister